Contact factor proteases and the complexes formed with alpha 2-macroglobulin can interfere in protein C assays by cleaving amidolytic substrates

Thrombophilia Screening: Not So Straightforward

Although inherited thrombophilias are lifelong risk factors for a first thrombotic episode, progression to thrombosis is multifactorial and not all individuals with inherited thrombophilia develop thrombosis in their lifetimes. Consequently, indiscriminate screening in patients with idiopathic thrombosis is not recommended, since presence of a thrombophilia does not necessarily predict recurrence or influence management, and testing should be selective. It follows that a decision to undertake laboratory detection of thrombophilia should be aligned with a concerted effort to identify any significant abnormalities, because it will inform patient management. Deficiencies of antithrombin and protein C are rare and usually determined using phenotypic assays assessing biological activities, whereas protein S deficiency (also rare) is commonly detected with antigenic assays for the free form of protein S since available activity assays are considered to lack specificity. In each case, no single phenotypic assay is capable of detecting every deficiency, because the various mutations express different molecular characteristics, rendering thrombophilia screening repertoires employing one assay per potential deficiency, of limited effectiveness. Activated protein C resistance (APCR) is more common than discrete deficiencies of antithrombin, protein C, and protein S and also often detected initially with phenotypic assays; however, some centres perform only genetic analysis for factor V Leiden, as this is responsible for most cases of hereditary APCR, accepting that acquired APCR and rare F5 mutations conferring APCR will go undetected if only factor V Leiden is evaluated. All phenotypic assays have interferences and limitations, which must be factored into decisions about if, and when, to test, and be given consideration in the laboratory during assay performance and interpretation. This review looks in detail at performance and limitations of routine phenotypic thrombophilia assays.

Unexpected effects of donor gender on the storage of liquid plasma

BACKGROUND

Swedish regulations in effect since 2006 allow the storage of plasma for transfusion up to 14 days at 2-6 degrees C and for 3 years at < or = -30 degrees C. In this study, the quality of currently used plasma components was investigated.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Plasma components, prepared from whole blood or by apheresis, either leucocyte depleted or not leucocyte depleted, were stored at 2-6 degrees C as liquid plasma or as thawed fresh-frozen plasma; 31% were from female donors. Concentration, function and activation markers of the plasma coagulation systems were investigated during storage for up to 42 days.

RESULTS

Cold-induced contact activation was the dominant storage lesion, occurring earlier and at higher frequency in plasma from females. Increased kallikrein-like activity led to changes in activated partial thromboplastin time, prothrombin time, protein C and C1 inhibitor (C1INH). C1INH function dropped to 53% on Day 14 in cold-activated plasma components.

CONCLUSION

Contact activation may be triggered before Day 14, especially in plasma from females, and may progress as a result of the consumption of C1INH. The data suggest that lack of cold-induced contact activation may be an important quality criterion. To achieve this, plasma from male donors could be selected for transfusion and the storage time limited to 7 days.

Quality Assurance Issues and Interpretation of Assays

The consequences of an erroneous thrombophilia diagnosis may be serious if it is used to determine clinical management. Therefore careful selection, assessment, and control of laboratory tests for thrombophilia are essential. As for other coagulation tests, the pre-analytical phase must be carefully controlled with attention to the specific problems associated with each type of assay. The investigator must then recognize that for most laboratory tests of thrombophilia, there are a number of assay types available, often based on different principles of analysis. This creates the potential for different users to obtain varying results depending on the technique employed. Such problems can occur in assays of antithrombin activity, depending on whether the assay employs factor Xa, human thrombin, or bovine thrombin. In clot-based assays of protein C and protein S, there can be specificity problems related to interference by factor V Leiden (FVL), antiphospholipid antibodies, and other substances. Even genetic tests can give erroneous results and should not automatically be seen as absolute without supporting evidence and careful quality-control measures. Whatever technique is selected, it is mandatory to incorporate sufficient concurrent quality-control samples to validate the results of thrombophilia tests. These should include assessment of the parameter at normal and abnormal levels to give confidence in results across the measurement range that would normally be encountered in routine practice. This should be used in conjunction with regular participation in external quality assessment (EQA) (which has been linked to improved laboratory performance in thrombophilia testing). Larger EQA programs can provide information concerning the relative performance of analytical procedures, including the method principle, reagents, and instruments. Herein, we describe many of the methodologic effects in detail. We use specific examples to illustrate the general principle that, in performing laboratory testing for thrombophilia, one must always consider the performance characteristics and limitations of the assay in use.

Macromolecular Chromogenic Substrates for Measuring Proteinase Activity

Background: Proteinase activities are often measured using chromogenic substrates that are much smaller than physiological substrates.

Methods: The hydrodynamic size of macromolecular substrates (macrosubstrates) prepared by linking small chromogenic substrates to polyethylene glycol was determined by gel filtration. Efficiency of macrosubstrate cleavage by proteinases and α2-macroglobulin-proteinase complexes was monitored spectrophotometrically.

Results: Macrosubstrates had hydrodynamic radii of ∼20 Å, similar to proteins with a molecular weight of 18 000. Different macrosubstrates served as efficient substrates for chymotrypsin, trypsin, and thrombin. Linking small substrates to a polymer variably affected substrate efficiency, with the impact on activity ranging from a 60-fold decrease to a 30-fold increase. Proteinases complexed with α2-macroglobulin had ∼10-fold lower activity vs macrosubstrates than small substrates.

Conclusions: Macrosubstrates are efficient substrates that allow decreased measurement of sterically hindered proteinase molecules such as α2-macroglobulin-proteinase complexes. Thus, macrosubstrates may provide more accurate functional assays of proteinases such as coagulation factors.