Superior venocaval obstruction secondary to central venous catheter-related thromboses in two patients with metastatic colorectal carcinoma receiving weekly 5-flurouracil. Should adjusted-dose warfarin be used as thromboprophylaxis?

Alteplase use for malfunctioning central venous catheters correlates with catheter-associated bloodstream infections

OBJECTIVES

A catheter thrombosis and the presence of a catheter-associated bloodstream infection (CBSI) often occur simultaneously, but it is unclear if or to what degree the two complications relate. Several animal and adult studies indicate a relationship between fibrin sheaths and thrombi in the development of CBSIs. To date, there has been limited human investigation in the pediatric population to determine a clear link between the presence of a thrombus and bacteremia. The use of alteplase for malfunctioning central venous catheter may indicate the formation of intraluminal thrombus or fibrin sheath. A catheter that requires alteplase is at higher risk of a CBSI.

DESIGN

A retrospective chart review from July 2008 to December 2010.

SETTING

PICU.

PATIENTS

All patients with central catheters admitted to the PICU.

INTERVENTIONS

No interventions performed with the retrospective study.

MEASUREMENTS

Number of total central venous catheters, number of central venous catheters that received treatment with alteplase, and number of CBSIs.

MAIN RESULTS

Preliminary data during the study period identified 3,289 central venous catheters. Twelve percent of these catheters required at least one dose of alteplase. There were 40 CBSIs during this same time period of which 28% received alteplase during the 5 days preceding the positive blood culture. The odds ratio for getting a CBSI when alteplase is administered is 2.87 (confidence interval 1.42-5.80; p = 0.002). The average age of the central venous catheters at time of infection was not statistically different, 16.1 days in the alteplase catheters compared with 25.6 days for the catheters that did not receive alteplase (p = 0.6).

CONCLUSIONS

There is a positive correlation between the use of alteplase for malfunctioning central venous catheters and the development of a CASBI. This is likely associated with the presence of an intraluminal fibrin sheath or thrombus. This study adds evidence linking thrombus formation to CBSI.

Tissue plasminogen activator to prevent central venous access device infections: a systematic review of central venous access catheter thrombosis, infection and thromboprophylaxis

The recent unequivocal demonstration that prophylaxis, three to four weekly factor infusions, is effective in preventing joint disease in children with haemophilia, has provided impetus to initiate prophylaxis early in such children. Yet, nearly a quarter (22%) of the 83% who required central venous access devices for factor infusion developed central venous access catheter (CVAD)-related infection. This limitation of CVAD use prevents many families from initiating prophylaxis. The frequent occurrence of local thrombosis accompanying CVAD-related infection in surgical patients and autopsy cases, the thrombogenic plastic CVAD surfaces, and local clot formation at the insertion site, suggest the potential role of thrombolytic agents in preventing these infections. Yet, correlation between CVAD-related infection and local thrombosis in children with haemophilia are lacking, and thromboprophylaxis to prevent CVAD-related infection is controversial. Tissue plasminogen activator (t-PA), a recombinant serine protease glycoprotein that lyses plasmin-bound fibrin and is safe and effective in the treatment of occluded catheters, has not been evaluated in the prevention of these infections. We performed a literature review of CVAD-related infection, CVAD-related thrombosis, and thromboprophylaxis studies to evaluate the role of t-PA in the prevention of these infections in children with haemophilia. Metanalysis of published thromboprophylaxis trials demonstrate current prophylaxis regimens do not prevent CVAD infection, and further, that thrombosis and infection do not necessarily occur simultaneously. Pilot data demonstrate CVAD infection reduction in haemophilic children by monthly t-PA in 18 haemophilic children, suggesting the potential role of t-PA in CVAD infection prevention. Clinical trials to evaluate t-PA in CVAD infection prevention are justified.

Prevention of central venous catheter-associated thrombosis: a meta-analysis

PURPOSE

Anticoagulant prophylaxis in patients with central venous catheters is controversial. We performed a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials of anticoagulant prophylaxis in patients with central venous catheters.

METHODS

MEDLINE and EMBASE were searched up to May 2006, supplemented by manual searches of conference proceedings and bibliographies.

RESULTS

Fifteen trials were included. Unfractionated heparin infusion, oral fixed low-dose vitamin K antagonist, and subcutaneous low-molecular-weight heparin were evaluated. For all catheter-associated deep vein thrombosis (symptomatic and asymptomatic combined), the summary relative risks ranged from 0.31 to 0.73 (all achieved statistical significance). For symptomatic deep vein thrombosis, the summary relative risks ranged from 0.28 to 0.72, but did not achieve statistical significance for any individual regimen.

CONCLUSION

Anticoagulant prophylaxis is effective for preventing all catheter-associated deep vein thrombosis in patients with central venous catheters. The effectiveness for preventing symptomatic venous thromboembolism, including pulmonary embolism, remains uncertain.

An observational study examining the impact of capecitabine on warfarin antithrombotic activity and bleeding complications

OBJECTIVE

The objectives of this study are to quantify the frequency of concomitant use of capecitabine and warfarin, and to quantify the rate of bleeding events and elevated international normalized ratio (INR) among concomitant users of warfarin and capecitabine.

RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS

We conducted a retrospective population-based study within the Henry Ford Health System (Detroit, MI) and the Kaiser Permanente Medical Care Program of Northern California (Oakland, CA). The study population included patients prescribed concomitant capecitabine and warfarin from 1 April 1997 through 31 July 2002. Data from the medical records of concurrent users were extracted through 31 August 2002.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

Concomitant use of capecitabine and warfarin, bleeding events, and INR laboratory results, collected from computerized databases and medical record review.

RESULTS

Overall, 11% of capecitabine users also received warfarin (99 / 883). Among 17 patients who received warfarin for venous access device prophylaxis, one bleeding event occurred during concomitant capecitabine/warfarin use (rate = 35.7 bleeding events per 100 person-years, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.9-198.9), and no events occurred during use of warfarin alone (95% CI 0.0-136.2) (p = 0.50). Among patients prescribed warfarin for indications other than port prophylaxis, no bleeding events occurred during concomitant use of capecitabine and warfarin (95% CI 0.0-34.6), and one event occurred during warfarin use alone (rate = 9.2 bleeding events per 100 person-years, 95% CI 0.2-51.3) (p = 0.54). We found one INR elevation > 3.0 among concomitant capecitabine/warfarin users receiving warfarin for port prophylaxis (rate = 35.7 per 100 person-years) and no INR elevations > 3.0 during use of warfarin alone (p = 0.46). Among patients using warfarin for indications other than port prophylaxis, the rates of INR > 3.0 were 309.7 per 100 person-years (95% CI 213.2-434.9) during concomitant capecitabine/warfarin use and 193.5 events per 100 person-years (95% CI 119.8-295.8) during use of warfarin alone (p = 0.09).

CONCLUSIONS

The results of our study show a low prevalence of capecitabine and warfarin concomitant use. We did not find large differences in the rates of bleeding events and elevated INR in patients receiving concomitant capecitabine and warfarin when compared with use of warfarin alone. While these results do not imply a lack of biologic interaction, our findings indicate that patients appear to be appropriately managed in clinical practice.