Interactions of etifoxine with the chloride channel coupled to the GABA(A) receptor complex

GABAergic Effects of Etifoxine and Alprazolam Assessed by Double Pulse TMS

INTRODUCTION

There is a need for novel anxiolytics with improved side effect profiles compared to benzodiazepines. A promising candidate with alternative pharmacodynamics is the translocator protein ligand, etifoxine.

METHODS

To get further insight into its mechanisms of action and side effects compared to the benzodiazepine alprazolam, we performed a double-blind, placebo-controlled, repeated-measures study in 36 healthy male subjects. Participants were examined for trait anxiety and side effects and underwent repeated transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) assessments, including motor evoked potentials (MEP), short intracortical inhibition (SICI), intracortical facilitation (ICF), and cortical silent period (CSP).

RESULTS

We observed attenuation of MEPs by alprazolam but not by etifoxine. SICI was not significantly affected by alprazolam or etifoxine. However, the response pattern indicated a lowered SICI threshold after the administration of etifoxine and alprazolam compared to the placebo. ICF and CSP were influenced by neither medication. Alprazolam led to higher sedation and subjective impairment of concentration compared to etifoxine. Individual anxiety trait scores did not affect TMS parameters.

DISCUSSION

This study indicated a favorable side effect profile of etifoxine in healthy volunteers. Moreover, it revealed differential GABA-related effects on neuromuscular function by means of TMS. The side effects and TMS profile of etifoxine are compatible with the involvement of neurosteroidogenesis and a predominant α3 subunit modulation compared to alprazolam.

Pharmacological Potential of cis-jasmone in Adult Zebrafish (Danio rerio)

This study evaluates the pharmacological potential of cis-jasmone (CJ) in adult zebrafish (Danio rerio; aZF). Initially, aZF (n = 6/group) were pretreated (20 µL; p. o.) with CJ (0.1 or 0.3 or 1.0 mg/mL) or vehicle (0.5% Tween 80). The animals were submitted to acute toxicity and locomotion tests, pentylenetetrazole-induced seizure, carrageenan-induced abdominal edema, and cinnamaldehyde-, capsaicin-, menthol-, glutamate-, and acid saline-induced orofacial nociception. The possible mechanisms of anticonvulsant, anxiolytic, and antinociceptive action were evaluated. The involvement of central afferent fibers sensitive to cinnamaldehyde and capsaicin and the effect of CJ on the relative gene expression of TRPA1 and TRPV1 in the brain of aZF were also analyzed, in addition to the study of molecular docking between CJ and TRPA1, TRPV1 channels, and GABA_A receptors. CJ did not alter the locomotor behavior and showed pharmacological potential in all tested models with no toxicity. The anticonvulsant effect of CJ was prevented by flumazenil (GABAergic antagonist). The anxiolytic-like effect of CJ was prevented by flumazenil and serotonergic antagonists. The antinociceptive effect was prevented by TRPA1 and TRPV1 antagonists. Chemical ablation with capsaicin and cinnamaldehyde prevented the orofacial antinociceptive effect of CJ. Molecular docking studies indicate that CJ interacted with TRPA1, TRPV1, and GABA_A receptors. CJ inhibited the relative gene expression of TRPA1 and TRPV1. CJ has pharmacological potential for the treatment of seizures, anxiety, inflammation, and acute orofacial nociception. These effects are obtained by modulating the GABAergic and serotonergic systems, as well as the TRPs and ASIC channels.

Long-lasting analgesic and neuroprotective action of the non-benzodiazepine anxiolytic etifoxine in a mouse model of neuropathic pain

Neuropathic pain is frequently associated with anxiety and major depressive disorders, which considerably impact the overall patient experience. Favoring GABAergic inhibition through the pain matrix has emerged as a promising strategy to restore proper processing of nociceptive and affective information in neuropathic pain states. In this context, the non-benzodiazepine anxiolytic etifoxine (EFX), known to amplify GABAergic inhibition through positive modulation of GABA_A receptors and neurosteroidogenesis, presents several advantages. Therefore, we sought to investigate the preclinical therapeutic potential of EFX on the somatosensory and affective components of neuropathic pain. Here, we used a murine model in which neuropathic pain was induced by the implantation of a compressive cuff around the sciatic nerve (mononeuropathy). We showed that the intraperitoneal EFX treatment for five consecutive days (50 mg/kg) relieved mechanical allodynia in a sustained manner. Besides its effect on evoked mechanical hypersensitivity, EFX also alleviated aversiveness of ongoing pain as well as anxiodepressive-like consequences of neuropathic pain following cuff-induced mononeuropathy. This effect was also seen 12 weeks after induction of the neuropathy when allodynia was no longer present. Analgesic and neuroprotective actions of EFX were also seen by the absence of neuropathic pain symptoms if a second sciatic nerve constriction injury was applied to the contralateral hindpaw. Mass spectrometry analysis revealed a normalization of brainstem serotonin levels in EFX-treated animals and an increase in norepinephrine. This study suggests that EFX presents promising therapeutic potential for the relief of both somatosensory and affective consequences of neuropathic pain, a beneficial effect that is likely to involve monoamine descending controls.

An update on the anxiolytic and neuroprotective properties of etifoxine: from brain GABA modulation to a whole-body mode of action

Treating the signs and symptoms of anxiety is an everyday challenge in clinical practice. When choosing between treatment options, anxiety needs to be understood in the situational, psychiatric, and biological context in which it arises. Etifoxine, a non-benzodiazepine anxiolytic drug belonging to the benzoxazine class, is an effective treatment for anxiety in response to a stressful situation. In the present review, we focused on several aspects of the cerebral and somatic biological mechanisms involved in anxiety and investigated the extent to which etifoxine's mode of action can explain its anxiolytic activity. Its two mechanisms of action are the modulation of GABAergic neurotransmission and neurosteroid synthesis. Recent data suggest that the molecule possesses neuroprotective, neuroplastic, and anti-inflammatory properties. Etifoxine was first shown to be an effective anxiolytic in patients in clinical studies comparing it with clobazam, sulpiride, and placebo. Randomized controlled studies have demonstrated its anxiolytic efficacy in patients with adjustment disorders (ADs) with anxiety, showing it to be superior to buspirone and comparable to lorazepam and phenazepam, with a greater number of markedly improved responders and a better therapeutic index. Etifoxine's noninferiority to alprazolam has also been demonstrated in a comparative trial. Significantly less rebound anxiety was observed after abrupt cessation of etifoxine compared with lorazepam or alprazolam. Consistent with this finding, etifoxine appears to have a very low dependence potential. Unlike lorazepam, it has no effect on psychomotor performance, vigilance, or free recall. Severe adverse events are in general rare. Skin and subcutaneous disorders are the most frequently reported, but these generally resolve after drug cessation. Taken together, its dual mechanisms of action in anxiety and the positive data yielded by clinical trials support the use of etifoxine for treating the anxiety signs and symptoms of individuals with ADs.

Involvement of the GABAA receptor α subunit in the mode of action of etifoxine

Etifoxine (EFX) is a non-benzodiazepine psychoactive drug which exhibits anxiolytic effects through a dual mechanism, by directly binding to GABA_A receptors (GABA_ARs) and to the mitochondrial 18-kDa translocator protein, resulting in the potentiation of the GABAergic function. The β subunit subtype plays a key role in the EFX-GABA_AR interaction, however this does not explain the anxiolytic effects of this drug. Here, we combined behavioral and electrophysiological experiments to challenge the role of the GABA_AR α subunit in the EFX mode of action. After single administrations of anxiolytic doses (25-50 mg/kg, intraperitoneal), EFX did not induce any neurological nor locomotor impairments, unlike the benzodiazepine bromazepam (0.5-1 mg/kg, intraperitoneal). We established the EFX pharmacological profile on heteropentameric GABA_ARs constructed with α1 to α6 subunit expressed in Xenopus oocyte. Unlike what is known for benzodiazepines, neither the γ nor δ subunits influenced EFX-mediated potentiation of GABA-evoked currents. EFX acted first as a partial agonist on α2β3γ2S, α3β3γ2S, α6β3γ2S and α6β3δ GABA_ARs, but not on α1β3γ2S, α4β3γ2S, α4β3δ nor α5β3γ2S GABA_ARs. Moreover, EFX exhibited much higher positive allosteric modulation towards α2β3γ2S, α3β3γ2S and α6β3γ2S than for α1β3γ2S, α4β3γ2S and α5β3γ2S GABA_ARs. At 20 μM, corresponding to brain concentration at anxiolytic doses, EFX increased GABA potency to the highest extent for α3β3γ2S GABA_ARs. We built a docking model of EFX on α3β3γ2S GABA_ARs, which is consistent with a binding site located between α and β subunits in the extracellular domain. In conclusion, EFX preferentially potentiates α2β3γ2S and α3β3γ2S GABA_ARs, which might support its advantageous anxiolytic/sedative balance.

Anxiolytics targeting GABAA receptors: Insights on etifoxine

OBJECTIVES

Anxiety and adjustment disorders are among the most prevalent mental health conditions. This review focuses on γ-aminobutyric acid receptor type A (GABA_AR)-mediated anxiolysis, describing the action of both endogenous and exogenous modulators of GABA_AR. Future directions and innovative strategies to alleviate anxiety symptoms are discussed, with a particular emphasis on etifoxine.

METHODS

We used available data from the recent literature to update the mode of action of anxiolytics. We focussed our search on anxiolytics acting at GABA_ARs, as well as on the pharmacological properties of formerly and currently prescribed anxiolytics.

RESULTS

Considering the adverse effects of current treatments aimed at increasing inhibitory controls, optimisation of existing pharmacotherapies is of crucial importance. Among the alternative compounds targeting the GABAergic system, translocator protein (TSPO) ligands, such as etifoxine (EFX), which promote endogenous neurosteroidogenesis, are emerging as promising candidates for anxiety relief. In several papers comparing the efficacy of benzodiazepines and EFX, EFX showed interesting properties with limited side effects. Indeed, neurosteroids are potent GABA_AR modulators with highly underrated anxiolytic properties.

CONCLUSIONS

Novel therapeutic strategies have been emerging following the recognition of neurosteroids as potent anxiolytics. Featured at the top of the list for well-tolerated anxiety relief, TSPO ligands such as etifoxine appear promising.

Etifoxine impairs neither alertness nor cognitive functions of the elderly: A randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled crossover study

Etifoxine hydrochloride (Stresam^®), a treatment indicated for psychosomatic manifestations of anxiety, could be an alternative to benzodiazepines. While no impact on alertness and cognitive functions has been proven among youth, data on elderly are lacking. The primary objective of this study was to measure the impact of etifoxine, lorazepam or placebo on alertness in the elderly. The secondary objectives were to evaluate cognitive performances and adverse effects. In this randomized, placebo-controlled, double-blind, 3-way crossover design, 30 healthy volunteers aged 65 to 75 years underwent three one-day sessions. After treatment intake, standardized cognitive tests were conducted using the Cambridge Neuropsychological Test Automated Batteries and other psychological tests (Stroop, Rey Auditory Verbal Learning Test, Digit Span). The reaction time (RTI) as primary endpoint was analysed using a 3 × 3 latin square variance analysis. A 100-mg dose of etifoxine has no deleterious impact on alertness and causes no cognitive disorders as compared to placebo (RTI: 744 ± 146 ms versus 770 ± 153 ms; p = 1.00). As expected, a 2-mg dose of lorazepam impairs alertness (RTI: 957 ± 251 ms versus placebo; p < 0.0001) and cognitive functions. A similar frequency of adverse events was observed with etifoxine and placebo while their incidence was 3-fold higher with lorazepam, drowsiness being the most frequent adverse event. No serious adverse events were observed. This study demonstrates in the elderly that a single dose of etifoxine does neither impair alertness nor any of the cognitive parameters evaluated. Etifoxine may be a good option when anxiolytic treatment is required, especially in elderly people.

Current status and future perspectives: TSPO in steroid neuroendocrinology

The mitochondrial translocator protein (TSPO), previously known as the peripheral benzodiazepine receptor (PBR), has received significant attention both as a diagnostic biomarker and as a therapeutic target for different neuronal disease pathologies. Recently, its functional basis believed to be mediating mitochondrial cholesterol import for steroid hormone production has been refuted by studies examining both in vivo and in vitro genetic Tspo-deficient models. As a result, there now exists a fundamental gap in the understanding of TSPO function in the nervous system, and its putative pharmacology in neurosteroid production. In this review, we discuss several recent findings in steroidogenic cells that are in direct contradiction to previous studies, and necessitate a re-examination of the purported role for TSPO in de novo neurosteroid biosynthesis. We critically examine the pharmacological effects of different TSPO-binding drugs with particular focus on studies that measure neurosteroid levels. We highlight the basis of key misconceptions regarding TSPO that continue to pervade the literature, and the need for interpretation with caution to avoid negative impacts. We also summarize the emerging perspectives that point to new directions that need to be investigated for understanding the molecular function of TSPO, only after which the true potential of this therapeutic target in medicine may be realized.

Etifoxine improves sensorimotor deficits and reduces glial activation, neuronal degeneration, and neuroinflammation in a rat model of traumatic brain injury

Background

Traumatic brain injury (TBI) results in important neurological impairments which occur through a cascade of deleterious physiological events over time. There are currently no effective treatments to prevent these consequences. TBI is followed not only by an inflammatory response but also by a profound reorganization of the GABAergic system and a dysregulation of translocator protein 18 kDa (TSPO). Etifoxine is an anxiolytic compound that belongs to the benzoxazine family. It potentiates GABAergic neurotransmission, either through a positive allosteric effect or indirectly, involving the activation of TSPO that leads to an increase in neurosteroids synthesis. In several models of peripheral nerve injury, etifoxine has been demonstrated to display potent regenerative and anti-inflammatory properties and to promote functional recovery. Prior study also showed etifoxine efficacy in reducing brain edema in rats. In light of these positive results, we used a rat model of TBI to explore etifoxine treatment effects in a central nervous system injury, from functional outcomes to the underlying mechanisms.

Methods

Male Sprague-Dawley rats received contusion (n = 18) or sham (n = 19) injuries centered laterally to bregma over the left sensorimotor cortex. They were treated with etifoxine (50 mg/kg, i.p.) or its vehicle 30 min following injury and every day during 7 days. Rats underwent behavioral testing to assess sensorimotor function. In another experiment, injured rats (n = 10) or sham rats (n = 10) received etifoxine (EFX) (50 mg/kg, i.p.) or its vehicle 30 min post-surgery. Brains were then dissected for analysis of neuroinflammation markers, glial activation, and neuronal degeneration.

Results

Brain-injured rats exhibited significant sensorimotor function deficits compared to sham-injured rats in the bilateral tactile adhesive removal test, the beam walking test, and the limb-use asymmetry test. After 2 days of etifoxine treatment, behavioral impairments were significantly reduced. Etifoxine treatment reduced pro-inflammatory cytokines levels without affecting anti-inflammatory cytokines levels in injured rats, reduced macrophages and glial activation, and reduced neuronal degeneration.

Conclusions

Our results showed that post-injury treatment with etifoxine improved functional recovery and reduced neuroinflammation in a rat model of TBI. These findings suggest that etifoxine may have a therapeutic potential in the treatment of TBI.

The non-benzodiazepine anxiolytic drug etifoxine causes a rapid, receptor-independent stimulation of neurosteroid biosynthesis

Neurosteroids can modulate the activity of the GABAA receptors, and thus affect anxiety-like behaviors. The non-benzodiazepine anxiolytic compound etifoxine has been shown to increase neurosteroid concentrations in brain tissue but the mode of action of etifoxine on neurosteroid formation has not yet been elucidated. In the present study, we have thus investigated the effect and the mechanism of action of etifoxine on neurosteroid biosynthesis using the frog hypothalamus as an experimental model. Exposure of frog hypothalamic explants to graded concentrations of etifoxine produced a dose-dependent increase in the biosynthesis of 17-hydroxypregnenolone, dehydroepiandrosterone, progesterone and tetrahydroprogesterone, associated with a decrease in the production of dihydroprogesterone. Time-course experiments revealed that a 15-min incubation of hypothalamic explants with etifoxine was sufficient to induce a robust increase in neurosteroid synthesis, suggesting that etifoxine activates steroidogenic enzymes at a post-translational level. Etifoxine-evoked neurosteroid biosynthesis was not affected by the central-type benzodiazepine (CBR) receptor antagonist flumazenil, the translocator protein (TSPO) antagonist PK11195 or the GABAA receptor antagonist bicuculline. In addition, the stimulatory effects of etifoxine and the triakontatetraneuropeptide TTN, a TSPO agonist, were additive, indicating that these two compounds act through distinct mechanisms. Etifoxine also induced a rapid stimulation of neurosteroid biosynthesis from frog hypothalamus homogenates, a preparation in which membrane receptor signalling is disrupted. In conclusion, the present study demonstrates that etifoxine stimulates neurosteroid production through a membrane receptor-independent mechanism.

Etifoxine versus alprazolam for the treatment of adjustment disorder with anxiety: a randomized controlled trial

Background

Adjustment disorder with anxiety (ADWA) is a highly prevalent condition, particularly in primary care practice. There are relatively few systematic treatment trials in the area of ADWA, and there are few data on predictors of treatment response. Etifoxine is a promising agent insofar as it is not associated with dependence, but in primary care settings benzodiazepines continue to be frequently prescribed for psychiatric symptoms. A randomized controlled trial of etifoxine versus alprazolam for ADWA was undertaken, focusing on efficacy and safety measures, and including an investigation of predictors of clinical response.

Methods

This was a comparative, multicenter, double-blind, randomized trial in two parallel groups of outpatients with ADWA. One group was treated with 150 mg/day for etifoxine, and the other with 1.5 mg/day for alprazolam for 28 days. Patients were followed for 4 weeks of treatment, and for an additional week after treatment discontinuation. The primary outcome measure was the Hamilton Anxiety Rating Scale (HAM-A), while secondary outcome measures included the Sheehan Disability Scale (SDS), the Clinical Global Impressions-Change Scale (CGI-C), and the Self-Report for the Assessment of Adjustment Disorders. Non-inferiority analysis was used to assess the primary outcome measure, and a multivariate logistic regression was employed to investigate predictors of response.

Results

Two hundred and two adult outpatients with ADWA were enrolled at 17 primary care sites. One hundred and seventy seven patients completed the study (n = 87 in the etifoxine group; n = 90 in the alprazolam group). Etifoxine and alprazolam were accompanied by decreases in the HAM-A at day 28, with a difference between treatment groups in HAM-A score of 1.78 [90% CI; 0.23, 3.33] in favor of alprazolam. However, after medication discontinuation, HAM-A scores continued to improve in the etifoxine group, but increased in the alprazolam group; the difference between groups in mean change between day 28 and day 35 was significant (p = 0.019). Secondary outcome measures showed similar results for etifoxine and alprazolam at day 35. More treatment-related adverse events were reported in patients treated with alprazolam, particularly central nervous system-related AEs, and especially after medication discontinuation. No significant predictors of treatment response were found.

Conclusion

This randomized controlled trial provides support for the efficacy and safety of etifoxine in the management of adjustment disorder with anxiety, particularly when treatment discontinuation data are also assessed. Etifoxine has the important clinical advantage of having anxiolytic effects, which are not being associated with dependence. Pharmacotherapy was equally efficacious in patients with more severe anxiety symptoms at baseline. Additional work using longer-term follow-up and collecting data on cost-efficiency of management options would further advance the field of ADWA.

Funding

Sponsorship and article processing charges for this study were provided by Biocodex, Gentilly, France.

Electronic supplementary material

The online version of this article (doi:10.1007/s12325-015-0176-6) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.

Characterization of the fast GABAergic inhibitory action of etifoxine during spinal nociceptive processing in male rats

Etifoxine (EFX) is a non-benzodiazepine anxiolytic which potentiate GABAA receptor (GABAAR) function directly or indirectly via the production of 3α-reduced neurosteroids. The later effect is now recognized to account for the long-term reduction of pain symptoms in various neuropathic and inflammatory pain models. In the present study, we characterized the acute antinociceptive properties of EFX during spinal pain processing in naive and monoarthritic rats using in vivo electrophysiology. The topical application of EFX on lumbar spinal cord segment, at concentrations higher than 30 μM, reduced the excitability of wide dynamic range neurons receiving non-nociceptive and nociceptive inputs. Windup discharge resulting from the repetitive stimulation of the peripheral receptive field, and recognized as a short-term plastic process seen in central nociceptive sensitization, was significantly inhibited by EFX at these concentrations. In good agreement, mechanical nociceptive thresholds were also significantly increased following an acute intrathecal injection of EFX. The acute modulatory properties of EFX on spinal pain processing were never seen in the simultaneous presence of bicuculline. This result further confirmed EFX antinociception to result from the potentiation of spinal GABAA receptor function.

Analgesic strategies aimed at stimulating the endogenous production of allopregnanolone

A growing number of studies indicate that 3-alpha reduced neurosteroids are remarkable analgesics in various pain states. This is the case for allopregnanolone (AP), one of the most potent endogenous positive allosteric modulators of GABA_A receptor function. From the pioneering work of Hans Selye, who described the sedative properties of steroids, synthetic compounds resembling the progesterone metabolite AP have been developed. If some of them have been used as anesthetics, it seems difficult to propose them as a therapeutic option for pain since they display several adverse side effects such as sedation, amnesia and functional tolerance. An alternative strategy, chosen by few laboratories around the world, is aimed at stimulating the local production of 3-alpha reduced neurosteroids in order to limit these well-known side effects. This pharmacological approach has the advantage of targeting specific structures, fully equipped with the necessary biosynthetic enzymatic machinery, where neurosteroids already act as endogenous pain modulators. The various pharmacological trials which attempted to treat pain symptoms by stimulating the production of 3-alpha reduced neurosteroids are reviewed here, as well as novel neurotransmitter systems possibly regulating their endogenous production.

Axonal regeneration and neuroinflammation: roles for the translocator protein 18 kDa

After a traumatic injury of the nervous system or in the course of a neurodegenerative disease, the speed of axonal regeneration and the control of the inflammatory response are fundamental parameters of functional recovery. Spontaneous regeneration takes place in the peripheral nervous system, although the process is slow and often incomplete. There is currently no efficient treatment for enhancing axonal regeneration, including elongation speed and functional reinnervation. Ligands of the translocator protein 18 kDa (TSPO) are currently under investigation as therapeutic means for promoting neuroprotection, accelerating axonal regeneration and modulating inflammation. The mechanisms of action of TSPO ligands involve the regulation of mitochondrial activity and the stimulation of steroid biosynthesis. In the peripheral nervous system, TSPO expression is strongly up-regulated after injury, primarily in Schwann cells and macrophages, but also in neurones. Its levels return to low control values when nerve regeneration is completed, strongly supporting an important role in regenerative processes. We have demonstrated a role for the benzoxazine etifoxine in promoting axonal regeneration in the lesioned rat sciatic nerve, either after freeze-injury or complete transection. Etifoxine is already clinically approved for the treatment of anxiety disorders (Stresam(®) , Biocodex, Gentilly, France). Daily treatment with etifoxine resulted in a two-fold acceleration in axonal regeneration, as well as in a marked improvement of both the speed and quality of functional recovery. The neuroregenerative effects of etifoxine are likely to be mediated by TSPO, and they may involve an increased synthesis of pregnenolone and its metabolites, such as progesterone. After freeze-injury of the sciatic nerve, administration of etifoxine also strongly reduced the number of activated macrophages and decreased the production of the inflammatory cytokines tumour necrosis factor-α and interleukin-1β. Thus, this drug offers promise for the treatment of peripheral nerve injuries and axonal neuropathies. It may also be used as a lead compound in the development of new TSPO-based neuroprotective approaches.

Differential effects of etifoxine on anxiety-like behaviour and convulsions in BALB/cByJ and C57BL/6J mice: any relation to overexpression of central GABAA receptor beta2 subunits?

Dysfunction of GABAergic transmission related to abnormal expression of GABA(A) receptor subunits in specific brain regions underlies some pathological anxiety states. Besides involvement of the benzodiazepine recognition site of GABA(A) receptor in the expression of anxiety-like behaviour, the roles of the β(2)/β(3) subunits are not well characterized. To address this issue, the experimental design of this study utilized the GABAergic compound etifoxine (with a preferential effectiveness after binding to a specific site at β(2)/β(3) subunits) tested in two inbred mouse strains: BALB/cByJ and C57BL/6J mice using three behavioural paradigms (light/dark box, elevated plus maze and restraint stress-induced small intestinal transit inhibition) and the t-butylbicyclophosphorothionate-induced convulsions model. Etifoxine plasma and brain levels and β(2)/β(3) mRNAs and protein expression levels in various brain regions were compared between the two strains. The two mouse strains differed markedly in basal anxiety level. Etifoxine exhibited more pronounced anxiolytic and anticonvulsant effects in the BALB/cByJ mice compared to the C57BL/6J mice. The etifoxine brain/plasma ratios of the two strains were not different. Beta2 subunit mRNA and protein expression levels were around 25 and 10% higher respectively in the anterodorsal nucleus of the thalamus and the CA3 field of hippocampus of BALB/cByJ mice compared to C57BL/6J mice. Beta3 subunit mRNA and protein expression levels did not differ between the two strains. Based on these results, it is suggested that overexpression of GABA(A) receptor β(2) subunit in BALB/cByJ mice relative to C57BL/6j mice contributes to the dysfunction in GABA(A) transmission in regions of brain known to regulate responses to stress. The dysregulated GABA(A) function in BALB/cByJ mice may be corrected by the administration of etifoxine.

The anxiolytic etifoxine protects against convulsant and anxiogenic aspects of the alcohol withdrawal syndrome in mice

Change in the function of gamma-aminobutyric acid(A) (GABA(A)) receptors attributable to alterations in receptor subunit composition is one of main molecular mechanisms with those affecting the glutamatergic system which accompany prolonged alcohol (ethanol) intake. These changes explain in part the central nervous system hyperexcitability consequently to ethanol administration cessation. Hyperexcitability associated with ethanol withdrawal is expressed by physical signs, such as tremors, convulsions, and heightened anxiety in animal models as well as in humans. The present work investigated the effects of anxiolytic compound etifoxine on ethanol-withdrawal paradigms in a mouse model. The benzodiazepine diazepam was chosen as reference compound. Ethanol was given to NMRI mice by a liquid diet at 3% for 8 days, then at 4% for 7 days. Under these conditions, ethanol blood level ranged between 0.5 and 2 g/L for a daily ethanol intake varying from 24 to 30 g/kg. These parameters permitted the emergence of ethanol-withdrawal symptoms once ethanol administration was terminated. Etifoxine (12.5-25 mg/kg) and diazepam (1-4 mg/kg) injected intraperitoneally 3h 30 min after ethanol removal, decreased the severity in handling-induced tremors and convulsions in the period of 4-6h after withdrawal from chronic ethanol treatment. In addition when administered at 30 and 15 min, respectively, before the light and dark box test, etifoxine (50mg/kg) and diazepam (1mg/kg) inhibited enhanced aversive response 8h after ethanol withdrawal. Etifoxine at 25 and 50 mg/kg doses was without effects on spontaneous locomotor activity and did not exhibit ataxic effects on the rota rod in animals not treated with ethanol. These findings demonstrate that the GABAergic compound etifoxine selectively reduces the physical signs and anxiety-like behavior associated with ethanol withdrawal in a mouse model and may hold promise in the treatment of ethanol-withdrawal syndrome in humans.

Preventive and curative effects of etifoxine in a rat model of brain oedema

1. The aim of the present study was to test the hypothesis that increasing GABAergic neurotransmission is involved in the prevention or treatment of brain oedema. The study was conducted in the well-established rat triethyltin (TET) model of brain oedema and examined the effects of etifoxine, a compound that increases GABAergic neurotransmission through multiple mechanisms, including neurosteroid synthesis. 2. Daily oral administration of 3 mg/kg per day TET for 5 consecutive days strongly perturbed rat behaviour and induced reproducible cerebral oedema. Coadministration of etifoxine (2 x 25 or 2 x 50 mg/kg per day, p.o.) over the 5 days of TET treatment blocked the development of brain oedema and the increase in brain sodium content induced by TET, as well as reducing the increase in brain chloride content. Moreover, etifoxine inhibited the decrease in bodyweight, the neurological deficit and the altered locomotor activity induced by TET. At a lower dose (2 <--> 10 mg/kg per day, p.o.), etifoxine did not have any preventive effects. 3. To examine the curative effects of etifoxine, it was administered from the 4th day of TET treatment for 5 consecutive days, when brain oedema was already established. In these experiments, etifoxine (2 <--> 50 mg/kg per day, p.o.) significantly reduced cerebral oedema and the outcomes induced by TET treatment. Moreover, etifoxine reduced the mortality in response to TET treatment. 4. In conclusion, because etifoxine has a good safety profile as an anxiolytic, the results of the present study suggest that it is worth further clinical investigation as a neuroprotectant.

Investigation of the anticonvulsive effect of acute immobilization stress in anxious Balb/cByJ mice using GABA A-related mechanistic probes

RATIONALE

A disordered regulation of neuroactive steroids release in response to acute stress could induce GABAergic dysfunctions underlying anxiety disorders.

OBJECTIVES

First, we conducted studies indicating that a short immobilization stress in anxious Balb/cByJ mice produced an anticonvulsive effect. Second, the effects of different positive allosteric modulators (etifoxine, progesterone, clonazepam, and allopregnanolone) of GABA A receptors were compared in a mouse model mimicking the disruption of the acute stress-induced neuroactive steroids release with finasteride (types I and II 5alpha-reductase inhibitor).

RESULTS

The acute stress-induced anticonvulsive effect, expressed by the threshold dose of t-butylbicyclophosphorothionate-producing clonic seizures, was time-dependent. The extent of the enhancement of acute stress-induced anticonvulsive effect was lowered in the presence of finasteride. The same effect was observed with PK11195, which behaves as an antagonist of the peripheral benzodiazepine receptor in the dose range used in this study. Picrotoxin reduced the acute stress anticonvulsive effect, proving that this effect operates through the GABA A receptor. Contrary to progesterone (up to 30 mg/kg), etifoxine (50 mg/kg), allopregnanolone (10 mg/kg), and clonazepam (10 microg/kg) inhibited the finasteride effect in stressed animals. The effect of etifoxine was blocked in the presence of finasteride and picrotoxin combined in stressed animals.

CONCLUSIONS

These findings support the hypothesis suggesting an involvement of neuroactive steroids in the anticonvulsive effect of restraint stress. The dual and complementary mechanisms of action of etifoxine (directly on the GABA A receptor and indirectly via the neuroactive steroids) may represent a therapeutic benefit in the treatment of various anxiety disorders with abnormal production of neuroactive steroids.

Neurosteroid allopregnanolone mediates anxiolytic effect of etifoxine in rats

Etifoxine (6-chloro-2-ethylamino-4-methyl-4-phenyl-4H-3,1-benzoxazine hydrochloride), a nonbenzodiazepine anxiolytic drug, potentiates GABA(A) receptor function perhaps through stimulation of neurosteroid biosynthesis. However, the exact mechanism of etifoxine action is not fully understood. In this study, we have assessed the possible role of GABAergic neurosteroid like allopregnanolone (ALLO) in the anxiolytic-like effect of etifoxine in rats using elevated plus maze test. Selective GABA(A) receptor agonist, muscimol, ALLO or neurosteroidogenic agents like progesterone, metyrapone or mitochondrial diazepam binding inhibitor receptor (MDR) agonist, FGIN 1-27 significantly heightened the etifoxine-induced anxiolysis. On the other hand, GABA(A) receptor antagonist, bicuculline or neurosteroid biosynthesis inhibitors like finasteride, indomethacin, trilostane or PBR antagonist, PK11195 significantly blocked the effect of etifoxine. Bilateral adrenalectomy did not influence anti-anxiety effect of etifoxine thereby ruling out contribution of adrenal steroids. Thus, our results provide behavioral evidence for the role of neurosteroids like ALLO in the anti-anxiety effect of etifoxine.

Lack of interaction between etifoxine and CRF1 and CRF2 receptors in rodents

Hyperactivity of the corticotropin-releasing factor (CRF) system occurs in some patients with anxiety disorders and depression. Blockade of CRF1 and CRF2 receptors can underlie the anxiolytic effects of drugs. In the present investigation, in vivo and in vitro studies were designed to determine whether the anxiolytic drug etifoxine, known to enhance GABAergic synaptic transmission, behaves also as a CRF1 and CRF2 receptor antagonist. A drug exerting multiple actions may be of clinical interest in the treatment of various different forms of mood disorders. Using two animal models, it was found that etifoxine reversed the excess CRF-induced grooming but not the hypo-locomotion of the rat placed in an open field. Etifoxine attenuated the CRF-induced gastric emptying delay in the mouse. On the other hand, in vitro, binding of etifoxine to CRF1 and CRF2 receptors on rat brain membranes was negligible and functionally, etifoxine did not block the CRF1 and CRF2 activation-induced cAMP production in presence of CRF in human neuroblastoma SH-SY5Y cells. The selective anxiolytic properties of etifoxine appear unrelated to an antagonist activity at the CRF1 and CRF2 receptors. The decrease in CRF activity produced by etifoxine may be related to its GABAergic properties.

Efficacy of etifoxine compared to lorazepam monotherapy in the treatment of patients with adjustment disorders with anxiety: a double-blind controlled study in general practice

Adjustment Disorders With Anxiety (ADWA) account for almost 10% of psychologically motivated consultations in primary care. The aim of this double-blind randomised parallel group study was to compare (non-inferiority test) the efficacies of etifoxine, a non-benzodiazepine anxiolytic drug, and lorazepam, a benzodiazepine, for ADWA outpatients followed by general practitioners. 191 outpatients (mean age: 43, female: 66%) were assigned to receive etifoxine (50 mg tid) or lorazepam (0.5-0.5-1 mg /day) for 28 days. Efficacy was evaluated on days 7 and 28 of the treatment. The main efficacy assessment criterion was the Hamilton Rating Scale for Anxiety score (HAM-A) on Day 28 adjusted to Day 0. The anxiolytic effect of etifoxine was found not inferior to that of lorazepam (HAM-A score decrease: 54.6% vs 52.3%, respectively, p=0.0006). The two drugs were equivalent on Day 28. However, more etifoxine recipients responded to the treatment (HAM-A score decreased by >or=50%, p=0.03). Clinical improvement (based on Clinical Global Impression scale CGI, Social Adjustment Scale Self-Report SAS-SR, and Sheehan scores) was observed in both treatment arms, but more etifoxine patients improved markedly (p=0.03) and had a marked therapeutic effect without side effects as assessed by CGI, p=0.04. Moreover, 1 week after stopping treatment, fewer patients taking etifoxine experienced a rebound of anxiety, compared to lorazepam (1 and 8, respectively, p=0.034).

The modulatory effects of the anxiolytic etifoxine on GABA(A) receptors are mediated by the beta subunit

The anxiolytic compound etifoxine (2-ethylamino-6-chloro-4-methyl-4-phenyl-4H-3,1-benzoxazine hydrochloride) potentiates GABA(A) receptor function in cultured neurons (Neuropharmacology 39 (2000) 1523). However, the molecular mechanisms underlying these effects are not known. In this study, we have determined the influence of GABA(A) receptor subunit composition on the effects of etifoxine, using recombinant murine GABA(A) receptors expressed in Xenopus oocytes. Basal chloride currents mediated by homomeric beta receptors were reduced by micromolar concentrations of etifoxine, showing that beta subunits possess a binding site for this modulator. In oocytes expressing alpha(1)beta(x) GABA(A) receptors (x=1, 2 or 3), etifoxine evoked a chloride current in the absence of GABA and enhanced GABA (EC10)-activated currents, in a dose-dependent manner. Potentiating effects were also observed with alpha(2)beta(x), beta(x)gamma(2s) or alpha(1)beta(x)gamma(2s) combinations. The extent of potentiation was clearly beta-subunit-dependent, being more pronounced at receptors containing a beta(2) or a beta(3) subunit than at receptors incorporating a beta(1) subunit. The mutation of Asn 289 in the channel domain of beta(2) to a serine (the homologous residue in beta(1)) did not significantly depress the effects of etifoxine at alpha(1)beta(2) receptors. This specific pattern of inhibition/potentiation was compared with that of other known modulators of GABA(A) receptor function like benzodiazepines, neurosteroids, barbiturates or loreclezole.

Effects of etifoxine on ligand binding to GABA(A) receptors in rodents

The GABA(A) receptor/chloride ionophore is allosterically modulated by several classes of anxiolytic and anticonvulsant agents, including benzodiazepines, barbiturates and neurosteroids. Etifoxine, an anxiolytic and anticonvulsant compound competitively inhibited the binding of [(35)S]t-butylbicyclophosphoro-thionate (TBPS), a specific ligand of the GABA(A) receptor chloride channel site. To investigate the etifoxine modulatory effects on the different binding sites of the GABA(A) receptor complex, we have examined the effects of etifoxine on binding of the receptor agonist [(3)H]muscimol and the benzodiazepine modulator [(3)H]flunitrazepam in rat brain membrane preparations. The anticonvulsant properties of etifoxine combined with muscimol and flunitrazepam were performed in mice with picrotoxin-induced clonic seizures. Etifoxine modestly enhanced binding of [(3)H]muscimol and of [(3)H]flunitrazepam by increasing the number of binding sites without changing the binding affinity of [(3)H]flunitrazepam. In contrast, the compound decreased the affinity of muscimol for its binding site. In vivo, the combination of subactive doses of etifoxine with muscimol or flunitrazepam produced an anticonvulsant additive effect against the picrotoxin-induced clonic seizures in mice. These results suggest that the interaction of etifoxine on the GABA(A) receptor complex would allosterically modify different binding sites due to conformational changes. Functionally, the resulting facilitation of GABA transmission underlies the pharmacological properties of etifoxine.

A double blind parallel group placebo controlled comparison of sedative and mnesic effects of etifoxine and lorazepam in healthy subjects [corrected]

This paper describes the psychomotor and mnesic effects of single oral doses of etifoxine (50 and 100 mg) and lorazepam (2 mg) in healthy subjects. Forty-eight healthy subjects were included in this randomized double blind, placebo controlled parallel group study [corrected]. The effects of drugs were assessed by using a battery of subjective and objective tests that explored mood and vigilance (Visual Analog Scale), attention (Barrage test), psychomotor performance (Choice Reaction Time) and memory (digit span, immediate and delayed free recall of a word list). Whereas vigilance, psychomotor performance and free recall were significantly impaired by lorazepam, neither dosage of etifoxine (50 and 100 mg) produced such effects. These results suggest that 50 and 100 mg single dose of etifoxine do not induce amnesia and sedation as compared to lorazepam.

Functional modulation of gamma-aminobutyric acid(A) receptors by etifoxine and allopregnanolone in rodents

We looked for an interaction between etifoxine and the neurosteroid allopregnanolone at central gamma-aminobutyric acid (GABA(A)) receptors. Etifoxine (2 microM) did not affect the affinity of allopregnanolone (IC(50)=108 nM) for its site in preparations of Sprague-Dawley rat cerebral cortex membranes, as determined by the inhibition of [(35)S] t-butylbicyclophosphorothionate binding, a specific ligand of the GABA(A) receptor chloride channel site. Etifoxine and allopregnanolone were anticonvulsants, blocking the clonic convulsions induced by bicuculline (an antagonist of the GABA(A) receptor) in CD1 mice. A combination of subactive doses of the two compounds showed additive anticonvulsant effects. These results suggest that etifoxine and allopregnanolone bind to distinct putative recognition sites at or near the chloride channel site. Functionally, their binding may have an additive effect by enhancing GABA(A) inhibitory transmission.