Anti-neoplastic activity of topotecan versus cisplatin, etoposide and paclitaxel in four squamous cell cancer cell lines of the female genital tract using an ATP-Tumor Chemosensitivity Assay

An update on current pharmacotherapy for vulvar cancer

INTRODUCTION

Limited data on the role of pharmacotherapy for patients with locally advanced, recurrent, or metastatic vulvar cancer are available.

AREAS COVERED

This article aims to provide an overview of the current treatment options for patients with vulvar cancer. PubMed (MEDLINE), Embase, CENTRAL, Scopus, and Web of Science databases, as well as ClinicalTrials.gov were searched to review the current evidence as well as future perspectives on the role of pharmacotherapy in patients with vulvar carcinoma.

EXPERT OPINION

There has been no consensus on the pharmacotherapy for patients with locally advanced, recurrent, or metastatic vulvar cancer. Concurrent platinum-based chemoradiation is the most widely used treatment modality for primary treatment or for neoadjuvant settings. Chemotherapy in metastatic disease is considered a palliative treatment. Anti-EGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitors seem to show promising anti-tumor activity in patients harboring EGFR alteration. Similarly, growing evidence supports the adoption of immune checkpoint inhibitors in both neoadjuvant and metastatic settings. Molecular and genomic profiling is advocated to identify target mutations. The PI3K/AKT/mTOR and HER/ErbB pathways might represent two intriguing treatment options. Treatments directed against HPV are discussed as well. Further evidence is warranted to identify the best treatment modalities for patients with locally advanced, recurrent, and metastatic disease.

Identification of cisplatin sensitizers through high-throughput combinatorial screening

cis-Diamminedichloroplatinum/cisplatin (CDDP) is a major drug used in cancer chemotherapy; however, the toxic side-effects and development of drug resistance represent major challenges to the clinical use of CDDP. The aim of the present study was to identify effective drug combination regimens through high-throughput drug screening that can enhance the efficacy of CDDP, and to investigate the underlying mechanisms. A cell-based high-throughput screening methodology was implemented, using a library of 1,280 Food and Drug Administration (FDA)-approved drugs, to identify clinical compounds that act synergistically with CDDP. Our study identified two compounds, namely potassium antimony tartrate and topotecan, that significantly enhanced the sensitivity of colorectal and non-small cell lung cancer cells to CDDP. The synergistic action of both compounds with CDDP was confirmed by further quantitative analyses. Topotecan is a topoisomerase-1 inhibitor that has previously been shown to enhance the clinical response and overall patient survival when combined with CDDP by a yet unclear mechanism. We demonstrated that the combination of topotecan with CDDP significantly inhibited colony formation ability and increased the apoptosis of several cancer cell lines. Mechanistic analyses revealed that topotecan enhanced CDDP-induced DNA damage and inhibited the repair of DNA strand breaks, without affecting the cellular platinum content. Overall, the findings of this study demonstrated that the use of the FDA-approved drug panel in high-throughput screening is an effective method for identifying effective therapeutic regimens that are clinically relevant, and may have high feasibility for translation into clinical practice.

The combination of cisplatin and topotecan as a second-line treatment for patients with advanced/recurrent uterine cervix cancer

We retrospectively reviewed outcomes of treatments with cisplatin and topotecan in patients with previously-treated uterine cervix cancer.We analyzed the medical records of patients with advanced (stage IVB) or recurrent or persistent squamous or non-squamous cell carcinoma of the cervix, who were treated with cisplatin and topotecan as a second-line chemotherapy between January 2000 and December 2015. The patients were treated with a combination of cisplatin (50 mg/m for 1 day) and topotecan (0.75 mg/m for 3 days) once every 3 weeks. Treatment response, progression-free survival (PFS), and overall survival (OS) were analyzed in all patients and between responder and non-responder groups (responders showed at least a partial response to prior systemic chemotherapy).Thirty-nine patients with a median age of 47 years (range, 32-73 years) were treated with cisplatin and topotecan. The median PFS was 4.6 months (95% confidence interval [CI], 1.2-7.9 months) and the median OS was 14.1 months (95% CI, 10.0-18.2 months). The overall response rate (ORR) was 30.8%, and the disease control rate was 56.4%. The ORR was significantly better in the responder group compared with the non-responder group (50.0% vs 10.5%; P = .008). All patients reported some grade of hematological toxicity. The most frequently encountered toxicity was anemia, with a rate of 59.7% for any grade and 13.2% for grade 3 or 4.The combination of cisplatin and topotecan was effective as second-line chemotherapy in patients with advanced/recurrent uterine cervix cancer.

Purinergic signalling and cancer

Receptors for extracellular nucleotides are widely expressed by mammalian cells. They mediate a large array of responses ranging from growth stimulation to apoptosis, from chemotaxis to cell differentiation and from nociception to cytokine release, as well as neurotransmission. Pharma industry is involved in the development and clinical testing of drugs selectively targeting the different P1 nucleoside and P2 nucleotide receptor subtypes. As described in detail in the present review, P2 receptors are expressed by all tumours, in some cases to a very high level. Activation or inhibition of selected P2 receptor subtypes brings about cancer cell death or growth inhibition. The field has been largely neglected by current research in oncology, yet the evidence presented in this review, most of which is based on in vitro studies, although with a limited amount from in vivo experiments and human studies, warrants further efforts to explore the therapeutic potential of purinoceptor targeting in cancer.

Old and new perspectives in the management of high-risk, locally advanced or recurrent, and metastatic vulvar cancer

During the last decades there has been a continuing evolution in the surgical approach of squamous cell carcinoma of the vulva that has been traditionally treated with radical vulvectomy and bilateral inguinal-femoral lymphadenectomy. Patients with T1 tumour are usually treated with radical local excision, if the lesion is unifocal and the remainder of the vulva is normal. Patients with T1a disease have no risk of groin metastases and do not need lymphadenectomy, whereas those with T1b disease need ipsilateral inguinal-femoral lymphadenectomy if the lesion is lateral, and bilateral lymphadenectomy if the lesion is midline. Modifications of the surgical technique of deep femoral lymphadenectomy and the mapping of sentinel node can offer new interesting therapeutic perspectives. Postoperative adjuvant pelvic and groin irradiation is warranted for patients with two or more or macroscopically involved groin nodes. Locally advanced squamous cell carcinoma of the vulva has been long surgically treated with en-block radical vulvectomy and bilateral inguinal-femoral lymphadenectomy plus partial resection of urethra, vagina or anum, or by exenteration, with severe postsurgical complications, poor quality of life, and unsatisfactory survival rates. 5-Fluorouracil [5-FU] or 5-FU- and cisplatin-based chemotherapy concurrent with irradiation followed by tailored surgery represents an attractive therapeutic option for advanced disease, planned to avoid such ultra-radical surgical procedures and, hopefully, to improve patient outcome. Chemotherapy has also been used in neoadjuvant setting, with contrasting and generally unsatisfactory results, and in palliative treatment of patients with distant metastases. Surgery is the primary treatment also for vulvar malignancies other than squamous cell carcinoma, whereas the clinical usefulness of adjuvant irradiation or chemotherapy is still to be defined. Primary chemoradiation can be also used for advanced carcinoma of the Bartholin gland or for advanced adenocarcinoma associated with extramammary Paget's disease. The drugs used for chemotherapy of metastatic melanomas or sarcomas of the vulva are the same employed for the melanomas or sarcomas developed in other sites.

The efficacy of Paclitaxel on solid tumour analysed by ATP bioluminescence assay and VEGF expression: a translational research study

BACKGROUND

Paclitaxel (Taxol), is known to induce mitotic arrest and apoptosis by inhibiting the depolymerisation of microtubules. Tumour growth and metastasis are affected by the metabolic rate and angiogenesis. We investigated the effect of Paclitaxel on tumour metabolism and markers of angiogenesis, vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Tissue samples of 39 patients diagnosed with invasive carcinoma were obtained. The solid tumours were cultured with Paclitaxel at a concentration of 4.27 ug/ml for 24 h. The metabolic rate of the samples was measured by ATP Bioluminescence assay and the levels of VEGF in culture medium were measured by ELISA.

RESULT

The mean ATP concentration of control and test groups were 7.169 and 5.004 rlu/ml, respectively, suggesting that the metabolic rate was inhibited by Paclitaxel. The mean VEGF levels in the control and test groups were 5.335 and 4.567 pg/ml, respectively. All data analysed were statistically significant (P < 0.005). The finding of the study showed that Paclitaxel could inhibit metabolic rate in solid tumour. It could also downregulate VEGF.

CONCLUSION

Our result suggested that Paclitaxel is an effective cytotoxic possibly with anti-angiogenic effects.

Gynecologic oncology group trials of chemotherapy for metastatic and recurrent cervical cancer

Because only 16% of patients with metastatic cervical cancer are alive 5 years after diagnosis, the Gynecologic Oncology Group (GOG) has carefully designed and conducted many phase II studies to identify promising drugs. Cisplatin has emerged as the most active single agent with overall response rates of 19%. Recent phase III trials have documented response rates of 27% and 39% when cisplatin has been combined with either paclitaxel or topotecan, respectively. The comparison of cisplatin to cisplatin plus topotecan in GOG-179 has yielded the first study to show a statistically significant impact on the overall response rate, median progression-free survival, and median survival, with all outcome measures favoring the two-drug regimen. Despite these encouraging results, however, most of the responses are partial and of short duration. The need for novel combinations and the implementation of active biologic agents is implicit. The accumulated data in this disease setting, as evidenced by the experience of the GOG, are presented in this review.

The role of topotecan in the treatment of advanced cervical cancer

Improvements in the early detection of cervical cancer have markedly reduced associated mortality rates over the past few decades; however, in patients diagnosed with cervical cancer the rates have remained unchanged for 25 years. Hysterectomy, alone or with radiotherapy, is effective in early-stage disease, with a high cure rate, but the treatment of advanced and recurrent cervical cancer (usually with radiotherapy and cisplatin) is suboptimal, with 5-year survival rates of 50.9 and 16.5% for patients with regional involvement or distant disease, respectively. There is therefore an unmet need for more effective treatments for patients with advanced disease, and a number of new chemotherapy agents and treatment strategies have been investigated in this setting. Promising results have been reported in phase II trials of the topoisomerase inhibitor I, topotecan. Response rates of up to 19% have been reported in patients treated with topotecan as a single agent and response rates of up to 54% have been achieved when this agent is used in combination chemotherapy regimens. Toxicity levels are similar to those observed in patients with relapsed ovarian cancer and are not significantly different from levels with other chemotherapy agents. This paper reviews the current management of advanced cervical cancer and summarizes the available data on the use of topotecan in this setting.

Update on the treatment of cervical and uterine carcinoma: focus on topotecan

Carcinomas of the uterine cervix and corpus are significant causes of morbidity and mortality among women in the U.S. and are expected to contribute 10,700 deaths in 2002. Despite the widespread use of cytologic screening and improvements in early diagnosis, mortality rates have changed little over the past 25 years, and the management of cervical and uterine cancers remains a significant unmet medical need. Currently available modalities, including radiotherapy and cisplatin-based chemotherapy, provide suboptimal control of disease, and there are no effective treatments for recurrent disease. The antitumor activity and tolerability of a number of novel agents, including topoisomerase I inhibitors, vinca alkaloids, taxanes, and gemcitabine, have been of considerable interest in treatment of these cancers. This review discusses current trends in the treatment of cervical and endometrial carcinomas, focusing on the potential role of topotecan in the treatment of non-ovarian gynecologic malignancies.

Phase I study of topotecan and radiation therapy in advanced cervical cancer

OBJECTIVE

The goal of this study was to determine the maximal tolerated dose (MTD) of topotecan given with external-beam radiotherapy in advanced cervical cancer.

METHODS

A prospective Phase I trial of topotecan given with standard external-beam radiotherapy was performed in patients with advanced squamous cell carcinoma of the cervix. Patients were treated with a starting dose of 0.5 mg/m(2) and escalated by 0.25 mg/m(2). Nine patients were treated. Hematologic and nonhematologic toxicity were measured.

RESULTS

Patients were treated with 1.0 mg/m(2) daily for 5 days on Days 1-5 and 22-26 concomitantly with radiotherapy without significant toxicity. Grade III anemia in one case and Grade II leukopenia in two cases were seen in the three patients at this dose level. Dose-limiting toxicity was not reached.

CONCLUSION

Topotecan can be safely administered at a dose of 1.0 mg/m(2) during external-beam radiotherapy for advanced cervical cancer.