Simultaneous anterior-posterior thoracolumbar spine surgery

One-stage posterior approaches for treatment of thoracic spinal infection: Transforaminal and costotransversectomy, compared with anterior approach with posterior instrumentation

Treating thoracic infective spondylodiscitis with anterior surgical approaches carry a relatively high risk of perioperative and postoperative complications. Posterior approaches have been reported to result in lower complication rates than anterior procedures, but more evidence is needed to demonstrate the safety and efficacy of 1-stage posterior approaches for treating infectious thoracic spondylodiscitis.Preoperative and postoperative clinical data, of 18 patients who underwent 2 types of 1-stage posterior procedures, costotransversectomy and transforaminal thoracic interbody debridement and fusion and 7 patients who underwent anterior debridement and reconstruction with posterior instrumentation, were retrospectively assessed.The clinical outcomes of patients treated with 1-stage posterior approaches were generally good, with good infection control, back pain relief, kyphotic angle correction, and either partial or solid union for fusion status. Furthermore, they achieved shorter surgical time, fewer postoperative complications, and shorter hospital stay than the patients underwent anterior debridement with posterior instrumentation.The results suggested that treating thoracic spondylodiscitis with a single-stage posterior approach might prevent postoperative complications and avoid respiratory problems associated with anterior approaches. Single-stage posterior approaches would be recommended for thoracic spine infection, especially for patients with medical comorbidities.

Simultaneous posterior and anterior approaches with posterior vertebral wall preserved for rigid post-traumatic kyphosis in thoracolumbar spine

STUDY DESIGN

A retrospective study.

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the radiological and clinical results of simultaneous surgery with preservation of the posterior vertebral wall for rigid post-traumatic kyphosis in the thoracolumbar spine.

SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA

Management of rigid post-traumatic kyphosis has been a challenge for surgeons. Current widely used posterior osteotomy procedures have the disadvantages of significant invasiveness, spinal column shortening, and instrumentation-related complications.

METHODS

From 2004 to 2009, 21 patients with rigid post-traumatic kyphosis in the thoracolumbar spine (T11-L2) were managed in our hospital. Average kyphotic angle was 45.2° ± 11.2° (range, 31°-67°). The surgical technique used was posterior and anterior circumferential release and anterior corpectomy with posterior vertebral wall preservation and short segmental instrumentation. Preoperative and postoperative kyphotic angle was measured to assess the degree of kyphosis correction and maintenance. Changes in low back pain were assessed by Japanese Orthopaedic Association scores.

RESULTS

All patients were successfully managed with this procedure without major complications. Most patients (19 of 21) were instrumented with anterior-only fixation, while posterior interspinal wire was added in 2 patients with osteoporosis. The mean blood loss was 470 mL (range, 300-700 mL). Patients were followed for an average of 32 months (range, 6-70 mo) postoperatively. Back pain was relieved to some degree in all patients and the improvement in Japanese Orthopaedic Association scores was 76.9% ± 7.9. Average kyphotic angle was 6.0° ± 5.7° (range, -2 to 17) immediately after surgery and 7.2° ± 5.8° (range, -3 to 17) at final follow-up. Average of 1° of correction loss was documented and all patients obtained solid fusion uneventfully.

CONCLUSION

This technique is indicated for most patients with rigid post-traumatic kyphosis in the thoracolumbar spine and can yield satisfactory clinical results not only in terms of pain relief, kyphosis correction, vertebral height restoration, and spinal canal integrity preservation, but also in reducing the risk of excessive bleeding and spinal cord injury.

Refinements to the simultaneous anterior-posterior approach to the thoracolumbar spine

The treatment of complex thoracolumbar disorders occasionally requires combined anterior and posterior approaches. Traditionally, these are either sequentially staged to occur during the same anesthesia procedure or alternatively performed on separate days. A less common option is the simultaneous anterior-posterior approach. The authors discuss the rationale for this approach in selected cases and illustrate a number of modifications to previous descriptions of the procedure. By slightly altering the incision, the risk of wound breakdown and infection has been reduced. The use of newly available positioning devices has allowed easy incorporation of fluoroscopy to guide the placement of spinal instrumentation. The authors have also expanded the use of the approach beyond the original oncological indications to include trauma and infection.

Simultaneous versus sequential one-stage combined anterior and posterior spinal surgery for spinal infections (outcomes and complications)

To compare simultaneous with sequential one-stage (same anaesthesia) combined anterior and posterior spinal surgery in the treatment of spinal infections in terms of the operation time, blood loss and complication rate. Fifty-six patients who underwent one-stage (same anaesthesia) simultaneous or sequential anterior decompression and posterior stabilisation of the involved vertebrae for spinal infection from January 1994 to December 2002 were reviewed. In group I (n=29), sequential anterior and posterior surgery was performed. In group II (n=27), simultaneous anterior and posterior spinal surgery was performed. With regard to age and gender, there was no statistical difference between both groups (P=0.05). The analysed and compared data between the two groups included the age, gender, blood loss, operation time and postoperative complications. There was a statistically significant difference between the two groups in terms of the duration of surgery, amount of blood transfusion needed and occurrence of major postoperative complications (P<0.05). The mean correction of the kyphotic deformity was similar in both groups (P>0.05) without a subsequent loss of correction on follow-up radiographic films at a mean follow-up of 6.5 years (range, 3 to 11 years). Simultaneous anterior and posterior surgery is a good alternative procedure. It provides the ability to manipulate both anterior and posterior aspects of the spine at the same time and appears to result in less blood loss, a shorter operative time and fewer complications. However, gaining experience and the availability of two surgical teams are important factors in the success of the procedure.

Neurofibromatosis type I with severe dystrophic kyphoscoliosis and its operative management via a simultaneous anterior-posterior approach: a case report and review of the literature

BACKGROUND CONTEXT

Neurofibromatosis is an autosomal-dominant hereditary disorder with two subtypes: NF-1 (type I) and NF-2 (type II). NF-1 is a complex disorder with a constellation of manifestations that can also entail skeletal abnormalities, including spinal deformity of a noncongenital nature with early age onset. The short, sharp, angular curve usually present in the thoracic region, as exhibited in NF-1, presents a quandary in its surgical management. Various studies have reported on the efficacy of anterior correction as opposed to posterior alone, whereas others have advocated a sequential, combined approach to diminish the degree of deformity and achieve solid arthrodesis. However, despite solid arthrodesis, curve progression may still ensue. Nonetheless, a simultaneous anterior-posterior approach to treat such a condition of NF-1 with severe dystrophic kyphoscoliosis is a rare occurrence.

PURPOSE

To describe the presentation and operative management of a patient with NF-1 and severe dystrophic kyphoscoliosis.

STUDY DESIGN

A case report and review of the literature.

METHODS

A clinical and radiographic review of a 51-year-old male patient who presented with NF-1, a 165-degree thoracic kyphotic deformity, associated scoliosis, varied degree of vertebral destruction of T9-T11, and paraparesis below T10.

RESULTS

Operative intervention of the deformity consisted of a simultaneous anterior-posterior approach and entailed posterior cord exposure, anterior vertebrectomy of T9-T11, cord decompression, posterior osteotomy (posterior elements were auto-fused), anterior distraction and kyphosis correction, anterior strut grafting, anterior rod instrumentation, and posterior compression instrumentation and fusion from T6-L2. The deformity was reduced, sold fusion was noted, and the patient was asymptomatic.

CONCLUSIONS

A simultaneous anterior-posterior approach for the surgical treatment of severe dystrophic kyphoscoliosis in neurofibromatosis type I is an avenue to properly visualize the spinal cord, achieve solid arthrodesis, and to minimize as well as prevent the progression of deformity.

Single-Surgeon Simultaneous Versus Staged Anterior and Posterior Spinal Reconstruction

BACKGROUND

Complex three-column disease of the thoracic or thoracolumbar spine often requires anterior and posterior surgical approaches for complete decompression and reconstruction. Although this has traditionally been accomplished with staged procedures, recent reports describe treatment with simultaneous anterior-posterior procedures, typically utilizing two spinal surgical teams. This study compares the surgical treatment of 14 patients, all with three-column disease of the thoracic or thoracolumbar spine, treated at a single institution.

METHODS

Half were treated by the author with single-surgeon simultaneous anterior-posterior surgical reconstruction, whereas half were treated by another surgeon with staged anterior and posterior approaches. The indications, operative details, hospital course, neurologic outcome, complications, and degree of deformity correction were compared through prospective and retrospective analysis.

CONCLUSIONS

Single-surgeon simultaneous anterior-posterior reconstruction represents a safe and practical approach to the treatment of three-column complex pathology of the thoracic or thoracolumbar spine and may allow better correction of deformity than staged procedures.