In vivo anteroposterior femorotibial translation of total knee arthroplasty: a multicenter analysis

Can Asymmetry in Total Knee Arthroplasty Design Lead to More Normal-Like Postoperative Kinematics? A Multi-Implant Evaluation

BACKGROUND

Few studies have evaluated the effects of symmetrical versus asymmetrical implant designs, more specifically the femoral condyles, trochlear groove, joint line, and bearing surfaces. The objective of this study was to investigate multiple posterior cruciate-retaining (PCR) total knee arthroplasty (TKA) designs influencing factors related to TKA asymmetry, and to investigate whether asymmetry can improve postoperative knee kinematics.

METHODS

In vivo tibio-femoral kinematics for 99 subjects was evaluated in this retrospective study. Overall, 10 subjects had a nonimplanted, normal knee, and 89 subjects had 1 of 3 PCR TKAs with varying degrees of asymmetry within their femoral and tibial components (PCR #1 = 30, PCR #2 = 29, PCR #3 = 30). All TKAs were implanted by the same surgeon and were analyzed using fluoroscopy during a deep knee bend.

RESULTS

At full extension, all 3 PCR TKAs experienced a more posteriorized position of the femoral condyles compared to the normal knee, with the 2 asymmetrical PCR TKAs experiencing more anteriorization compared to the third, symmetrical PCR TKA. Both the normal knee and the PCR TKA with greatest amount of asymmetry experienced statistically more posterior femoral rollback of the lateral condyle than the other 2 PCR TKAs. The PCR TKA with greater asymmetry also experienced statistically greater range of motion than the other 2 PCR TKAs.

CONCLUSIONS

With increasing flexion, the design with the most asymmetry also experienced the most posterior femoral rollback, axial rotation, and greatest range of motion. The results in this study seem to suggest that the inclusion of asymmetry in a TKA could be beneficial for achieving more normal-like kinematics and greater weight-bearing knee flexion.

Total Knee Arthroplasty Kinematics Predict Patient-Reported Outcome Measures: Implications for Clinical Kinematic Examinations

BACKGROUND

A core tenet of total knee arthroplasty (TKA) is that achieving more natural kinematics will lead to superior patient outcomes. Yet this relationship has not been proven for large representative cohorts of TKA patients because accurately measuring 3-dimensional TKA kinematics is time-consuming and expensive. But advanced imaging systems and machine learning-enhanced analysis software will soon make it practical to measure knee kinematics preoperatively and postoperatively in the clinic using radiographic methods. The purpose of this study was to assess the reported relationships between TKA kinematics and outcomes and distill those findings into a proposal for a clinically practical protocol for a clinical kinematic exam.

METHODS

This study reviewed the recent literature relating TKA kinematics to patient outcomes. There were 10 studies that reported statistical associations between TKA kinematics and patient outcome scores utilizing a range of functional activities. We stratified these activities by the complexity of the radiographic examination to create a proposed examination protocol, and we generated a list of requirements and characteristics for a practical TKA clinical kinematic examination.

RESULTS

Given considerations for a clinically practical kinematic exam, including equipment, time and other resources, we propose 3 exam levels. With basic radiographs, we suggest studying single-leg stance in extension, lunge or squat, and kneeling. For fluoroscopic systems with X-ray pulses up to 20 ms, we propose chair-rise or stair ascent to provide additional dynamic information. For fluoroscopic systems with X-ray pulses of less than 10 ms, we propose rapid open-chain knee flexion-extension to simulate the highly dynamic swing phase of gait.

CONCLUSIONS

It is our hope that this proposed examination protocol spurs discussion and debate so that there can be a consensus approach to clinical examination of knee and TKA kinematics when the rapidly advancing hardware and software capabilities are in place to do so.

Intraoperative Kinematics in Posterior Cruciate Ligament Retaining Total Knee Arthroplasty Using Different Inserts

We analyzed the intraoperative kinematics of total knee arthroplasty (TKA) using a navigation system to investigate the influence of different inserts on kinematics. This was a retrospective observational study. The Vanguard individualized design (33 patients, 33 knees) XP and anterior-stabilized (AS) inserts were used in TKA for osteoarthritis. Kinematic data were intraoperatively recorded. The range of motion, tibiofemoral rotational angle, anteroposterior translation of the femur, and varus-valgus laxity were compared between the two inserts (XP vs. AS). There was no significant difference in the range of motion (extension: XP, 3.7° ± 3.3° vs. AS, 3.8° ± 3.3°, p = 0.84; flexion: XP, 138.1° ± 10.2° vs. AS, 139.0° ± 13.3°, p = 0.73). With the AS insert, the tibia was gradually internally rotated as the knee was flexed. At maximum extension, the internal rotation was smallest with AS (XP 6.5° ± 4.0° vs. AS 5.1° ± 3.4°, p = 0.022), which was also associated with smaller anterior femoral translation (maximum extension: XP, 14.1 ± 4.8 mm vs. AS, 11.3 ± 4.7 mm, p = 0.00036; 30°: XP, 23.7 ± 5.6 mm vs. AS, 20.7 ± 5.1 mm, p = 0.000033; 45°: XP, 24.4 ± 4.9 mm vs. AS, 23.2 ± 4.5 mm, p = 0.0038). The AS was associated with a lower varus-valgus laxity (30° XP 4.1° ± 3.4 vs. AS 3.3° ± 2.7°, p = 0.036; 60°: XP, 3.2° ± 3.0° vs. AS, 2.4° ± 3.3°, p = 0.0089). The AS insert facilitated sequential tibiofemoral rotation with varus-valgus stability in mid-flexion without restricting the range of motion.

The Medial Pivot Design in Total Knee Arthroplasty

Medial pivot total knee arthroplasty implants are designed to function in a similar manner to that of the native knee with a relatively fixed medial center of rotation and a less conforming lateral compartment that follows an arcuate path. Medial pivot implants in total knee arthroplasty have increased in popularity with many companies offering medial pivot or retrofitted medial congruent implants, and there are variations between the various medial pivot and medial congruent implants. Existing literature on medial pivot implants have demonstrated high survivorship and patient outcomes. More studies are needed to compare newer medial pivot implants with each other and with retrofitted medial congruent implants.

Posterior stabilised total knee arthroplasty is associated with improved post-operative knee specific function, health related quality of life and greater satisfaction when compared to cruciate retaining protheses

PURPOSE

To assess whether there were differences in knee specific function, health related quality of life (HRQoL), and satisfaction between patients with a cruciate retaining (CR) or a posterior stabilised (PS) total knee arthroplasty (TKA) at 1 and 2 years postoperatively.

METHODS

A retrospective review of TKA (CR and PS) patients from a prospectively collected arthroplasty database. Patient demographics, body mass index and ASA grade, Oxford knee score (OKS) and EuroQol 5-dimension (EQ-5D) 3-level, which was used to assess HRQoL, were collected preoperatively and 1 year and 2 years postoperatively. Regression was used to adjust for confounding factors.

RESULTS

The sample included 3122 TKA, of which 1009 (32.3%) were CR and 2112 (67.7%) were PS. The PS group were more likely to be female (odd ratio (OR) 1.26, p = 0.003) and undergo resurfacing of the patella (OR 6.63, p < 0.001). There was a significantly greater improvement in the 1 year OKS in the PS group (mean difference (MD) 0.9, p = 0.016). The PS TKA was independently associated with a greater 1 year (MD 1.1, 95% CI 0.4 to 1.9, p = 0.001) and 2 years (MD 0.8, p = 0.037) post-operative improvements in OKS. PS TKA was also independently associated with a greater 1 year (MD 0.021, p = 0.024) and 2 years (MD 0.022, p = 0.025) post-operative and change in EQ-5D utility compared to the CR group. The PS group was more likely to be satisfied with their outcome at 1 year (OR 1.75, p < 0.001) and at 2 years (OR 1.38, p = 0.001) when adjusting for confounders.

CONCLUSION

PS TKA was associated with a better knee specific function and HRQoL when compared to CR, but the clinical significance of this is not clear. However, the PS group was more likely to be satisfied with their outcome compared to the CR group.

Wider translations and rotations in posterior-stabilised mobile-bearing total knee arthroplasty compared to fixed-bearing both implanted with mechanical alignment: a dynamic RSA study

PURPOSE

The purpose of this study was to investigate the in vivo kinematics of the same femoral design mechanically aligned posterior-stabilised (PS) total knee arthroplasty (TKA) with either fixed-bearing (FB) or mobile-bearing (MB) inlay, implanted by the same surgeon, using model-based dynamic radiostereometric analysis (RSA). The hypothesis of the present study was that the MB design would show wider axial rotation than the FB design, without affecting the clinical outcomes.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A cohort of 21 non-randomised patients (21 DePuy Attune PS-FB) was evaluated by dynamic RSA analysis at a minimum 9-month follow-up, while performing differently demanding daily living activities such as sit to stand (STS) and deep knee lunge (DKL). Kinematic data were compared with those of a cohort of 22 patients implanted with the same prosthetic design but with MB inlay. Anterior-posterior (AP) translations, varus-valgus (VV) and internal-external (IE) rotations of the femoral component with respect to the tibial baseplate were investigated. Translation of medial and lateral compartment was analysed using the low point method according to Freeman et al. Questionnaires to calculate objective and subjective clinical scores were administered preoperatively and during follow-up visit by the same investigator.

RESULTS

The FB TKA design showed lower AP translation during STS (6.8 ± 3.3 mm in FB vs 9.9 ± 3.7 mm in MB, p = 0.006*), lower VV rotation (1.9 ± 0.8° in FB vs 5.3 ± 3.3° in MB, p = 0.005) and lower IE rotation (2.8 ± 1.1° in FB vs 9.5 ± 4.3° in MB, p = 0.001) during DKL than the mobile-bearing TKA design. Posterior-stabilised FB group showed significant lower translation of the low point of the medial compartment than the MB group (p = 0.008). The percentage of patients performing medial pivot in the FB group was higher compared to MB group in the examined motor tasks. No significant differences in post-operative range of motion (117° ± 16° for FB group and 124° ± 13° for MB group) and in clinical outcomes emerged between the two cohort.

CONCLUSIONS

The FB and MB designs differed in AP translations, VV rotations and IE rotations of the femoral component with respect to the tibial component in STS and DKL. Furthermore, FB cohort reported a significant higher percentage of medial pivot with respect to MB cohort. Despite this, no differences in clinical outcomes were detected between groups. Both designs showed stable kinematics and represent a viable option in primary TKA.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Prospective cohort study, II.

Progression of varus deformity in osteoarthritic knees induces anterior paradoxical motion of the femur during early knee flexion

PURPOSE

The purpose of this study was to investigate the position of the femur relative to the tibia throughout range of motion in the osteoarthritic knee to evaluate knee kinematics and assess its relationship with the degree of varus deformity.

METHODS

In this study, 116 preoperative knees with varus deformity were evaluated using a navigation system. The internal-external, anteroposterior, and mediolateral positions of the femur relative to the tibia were measured at maximum extension, 15°, 30°, 45°, 60°, 90°, 105°, and 120°, and maximum flexion angles. From these parameters, two-dimensional translation of the surgical epicondylar axis was projected onto the tibial axial plane, and the femoral movement was evaluated relative to the tibia. In addition, the knees were retrospectively classified into three groups according to their degrees of preoperative hip-knee-ankle angle: mild (< 10°), moderate (10°-20°), and severe (> 20°). Then, the differences in each parameter between these groups were investigated. The Steel-Dwass test was performed to identify the difference among three groups. Statistical significance was set at p values < 0.05.

RESULTS

There was a significant difference in the anteroposterior position of the femur relative to the tibia among the three groups, especially from extension to early flexion (p < 0.05). The anteroposterior position at knee extension deviated posteriorly according to the progression of varus deformity. Rotational and mediolateral translation were not significantly different among the groups. Normal knee kinematics were diminished in almost all cases in each group. In addition, anterior paradoxical motion of the femur during early knee flexion was observed in 45.6% (n = 26), 57.1% (n = 28), and 80.0% (n = 8) of cases in the mild, moderate, and severe groups, respectively. The anteroposterior position of the femur relative to the tibia at knee extension was significantly more posterior in patients with than in those without anterior paradoxical motion (p < 0.0001).

CONCLUSION

The anteroposterior position of the femur relative to the tibia changed according to the progression of varus deformity in osteoarthritic knees, especially from knee extension to early flexion. Posterior deviation of the femur at knee extension induced its anteroposterior movement relative to the tibia, resulting in anterior paradoxical motion.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

III.

Modern Total Knee Arthroplasty Bearing Designs and the Role of the Posterior Cruciate Ligament

The role of the posterior cruciate ligament (PCL) in total knee arthroplasty (TKA) surgery continues to be a source of debate among the adult reconstruction community. In native knee flexion, the PCL is comprised of an anterolateral and posteromedial bundle that work together to limit posterior tibial translation and allow adequate femoral rollback for deep flexion. In the arthritic knee, the PCL can often become dysfunctional and attenuated, which led to the development of posterior stabilized (PS) TKA bearing options. PS TKAs implement a cam-post construct to functionally replace a resected PCL. While PS designs may facilitate balancing knees with significant deformity, they are associated with complications such as postfracture, increased wear, and patellar clunk/crepitus. In recent years, newer designs have been popularized with greater degrees of congruency and incorporation of medial and lateral pivoting to better recreate native knee kinematics. The American Joint Registry has confirmed the recent predilection for ultra-congruent and cruciate-retaining TKA inserts over PS TKAs during the last decade. Studies have failed to identify an overall clinical superiority between the cruciate substituting and sacrificing designs. The literature has also failed to identify clinical consequences from PCL resection with modern, more conforming TKA designs. In this article, we review modern PCL sacrificing designs and discuss the impact of each on the kinematics after TKA. We also will delineate the role of the PCL in modern TKA in the hopes to better understand the recent surge in sacrificing but not substituting knee implants.

Medial congruent polyethylene design show different tibiofemoral kinematics and enhanced congruency compared to a standard symmetrical cruciate retaining design for total knee arthroplasty-an in vivo randomized controlled study of gait using dynamic radiostereometry

PURPOSE

New total knee arthroplasty implant designs attempt to normalize kinematics patterns that may improve functional performance and patient satisfaction. It was hypothesized that a more medial congruent (MC) anatomic bearing design (1) influences the tibiofemoral kinematics and (2) enhances articular congruency compared to a standard symmetrical cruciate retaining (CR) bearing design.

METHODS

In this double-blinded randomized study, 66 patients with knee osteoarthritis were randomly included in two groups: MC (n = 31) and CR (n = 33). Clinical characteristics such as knee ligament lesions and knee osteoarthritis scores were graded on preoperative magnetic resonance imaging and radiography. At the 1-year follow-up, dynamic radiostereometric analysis was used to assess tibiofemoral joint kinematics and articulation congruency. Patient-reported outcome measures, Oxford Knee Score, the Forgotten Joint Score, and the Knee Osteoarthritis Outcome Score, were assessed preoperatively and at the 1-year follow-up.

RESULTS

Compared to the CR bearing, the MC bearing displayed an offset with approximately 3 mm greater anterior tibial drawer (p < 0.001) during the entire motion, and up to approximately 3.5 degrees more tibial external rotation (p = 0.004) from mid-swing to the end of the gait cycle at the 1-year follow-up. Furthermore, the congruency area in the joint articulation was larger during approximately 80% of the gait cycle for the MC bearing compared to the CR. The patient-reported outcome measures improved (p < 0.001), but there were no differences between groups. In addition, there were no differences in clinical characteristics and there were no knee revisions or recognized deep infections during follow-up.

CONCLUSION

The study demonstrates that the MC-bearing design changes tibiofemoral kinematics and increases the area of congruency towards more native knee kinematics than the CR bearing. In perspective this may contribute to a more stabilized knee motion, restoring the patient's confidence in knee function during daily activities.

Mid-Flexion, Anteroposterior Stability of Total Knee Replacement Implanted with Kinematic Alignment: A Randomized, Quantitative Radiographic Laxity Study with Posterior-Stabilized and Medial-Stabilized Implants

UPDATE

This article was updated on January 4, 2023, because of a previous error, which was discovered after the preliminary version of the article was posted online. On page 16, in Figure 5, the x-axis that had read "P<0.0086" now reads "KSS Pain (p=0.02)," and the value for the MS group that had read "48.9" now reads "48.8."This article was updated on January 6, 2022, because of a previous error. On page 13, in the section entitled "Results," the sentence that had read "However, when only the subset of female subjects was considered, the MS group demonstrated significantly less anteroposterior laxity in 90° of flexion than the MS group (2.3 versus 5.4 mm; p = 0.008)." now reads "However, when only the subset of female subjects was considered, the MS group demonstrated significantly less anteroposterior laxity in 90° of flexion than the PS group (2.3 versus 5.4 mm; p = 0.008)."

BACKGROUND

Stability in mid-flexion is important for satisfactory clinical outcomes following total knee arthroplasty (TKA). The purpose of the present study was to compare the anteroposterior stability of knees that had been treated with a posterior-stabilized (PS) device or a medial-stabilized (MS) device. We hypothesized that mid-flexion laxity would be greater in the PS group and that clinical outcome scores would be better for the group with lower laxity.

METHODS

Sixty-three patients who had been randomly selected from a larger randomized, prospective, blinded clinical trial underwent primary TKA with either a PS implant (n = 30) or an MS implant (n = 33). Range of motion, the Knee Society Score (KSS), and the Forgotten Joint Score (FJS) were collected, and anteroposterior laxity with the knee in 45° and 90° of flexion was evaluated with stress radiographs.

RESULTS

In 45° of flexion, the MS group demonstrated significantly less total anteroposterior displacement than the PS group (mean, 3.6 versus 16.5 mm; p ≤ 0.0001). In 90° of flexion, the total anteroposterior displacement was not significantly different for the 2 groups when both male and female patients were included (mean, 3.9 versus 5.9; p = 0.07). However, when only the subset of female subjects was considered, the MS group demonstrated significantly less anteroposterior laxity in 90° of flexion than the PS group (2.3 versus 5.4 mm; p = 0.008). The groups did not differ significantly in terms of preoperative age, body mass index, sex distribution, FJS, KSS, or range of motion, and they also did not differ in terms of postoperative FJS or range of motion. However, all 33 patients in the MS group returned to sports as indicated in question 12 of the FJS, compared with 19 subjects in the PS group (p = 0.0001). The postoperative KSS Pain, Pain/Motion, and Function scores were all significantly higher in the MS group than the PS; specifically, the mean KSS Pain score was 48.8 in the MS group, compared with 44.8 in the PS group (p = 0.02); the mean KSS Pain/Motion score was 98.4 in the MS group, compared with 89.5 in the PS group (p < 0.0001); and the mean KSS Function score was 95.5 in the MS group, compared with 85.7 in the PS group (p = 0.003).

CONCLUSIONS

Mid-flexion laxity was greater in patients with PS implants than in those with MS implants, and laxity in 90° was greater in the subset of female patients in the PS group. The decreased laxity observed in the MS group correlated with higher KSS Pain, Pain/Motion, and Function scores as well as with a higher rate of return to sports activities.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Therapeutic Level I . See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

Posterior-stabilized total knee arthroplasty kinematics and joint laxity: A hybrid biomechanical study

BACKGROUND

Posterior-stabilized (PS)-total knee arthroplasty (TKA) arose as an alternative to cruciate-retaining (CR)-TKA in the 1970s. Since then, it has become a popularly utilized TKA design with outcomes comparable to CR-TKA. The post-cam mechanism is unique to PS-TKA as it substitutes the function of the posterior cruciate ligament (PCL). The study aimed to understand the kinematic and laxity changes in PS-TKA with under- and overstuffing of the tibiofemoral joint space with the polyethylene (PE) insert.

METHODS

This study employed a hybrid computational-experimental joint motion simulation on a VIVO 6 degrees of freedom (6-DoF) joint motion simulator (AMTI, Watertown, MA, USA). Physical prototypes of a virtually-performed TKA in mechanical alignment (MA) and kinematic alignment (KA) based on cadaveric CT scans and a virtual ligament model were utilized. The reference, understuffed (down 2 mm) and overstuffed (up 2 mm) joint spaces were simulated, neutral flexion and laxity testing loads and motions were performed for each configuration.

RESULTS

The PE insert thickness influenced post-cam engagement, which occurred after 60º in the overstuffed configurations, after 60º-75º in the reference configurations and after 75º in the understuffed configurations. The understuffed configurations, compared to the reference configurations, resulted in a mean 2.0º (28%) and 2.0º (31%) increase in the coronal laxity in MA and KA respectively. The overstuffed configurations, compared to the reference configuration, resulted in an increase in the mean joint compressive forces (JCFs) by 73 N (61%) and 77 N (62%) in MA and KA models, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

The under- and overstuffing in PS-TKA alter the kinematics with variable effects. Understuffing decreases the stability, JCFs and inverse with overstuffing. Subtle changes in the PE insert thickness alter the post-cam mechanics.

Polyethylene Components in Primary Total Knee Arthroplasty: A Comprehensive Overview of Fixed Bearing Design Options

The articular design of a polyethylene insert influences the kinematics and overall function of a total knee arthroplasty (TKA). Standard symmetric posterior-stabilized and cruciate-retaining polyethylene designs have a long track record of high patient satisfaction and longevity in TKA. However, the number and variety of polyethylene inserts and articulations have continued to evolve in an attempt to better replicate native knee kinematics or provide additional constraint. Ultracongruent polyethylene designs have been touted as increasing stability while maintaining the benefits of cruciate-retaining knees. Medial pivot and lateral/dual pivot polyethylene designs were introduced to mimic more normal knee kinematics with regard to femoral rollback. Further, with increasing recognition of knee instability as a cause for persistent symptoms and revision TKA, the utilization of midlevel constraint polyethylene inserts has been increasing, with multiple implant companies offering an insert design with increased constraint for use with a primary femoral component. In this rapidly evolving arena in with a myriad of options available, surgeons should be knowledgeable about the design concepts and their applicable uses for specific patient scenarios. Future research is needed to better understand whether a particular type or design of polyethylene insert and articulation leads to improved patient reported outcomes, improved replication of knee kinematics, and long-term durable implant survivorship.

In vivo kinematic comparison of medial pivot total knee arthroplasty in weight-bearing and non-weight-bearing deep knee bending

BACKGROUND

This study aimed to determine the kinematics of medial pivot total knee arthroplasty by comparing weight-bearing and non-weight-bearing deep knee bending and to evaluate the effect of the weight-bearing state on the kinematics.

METHODS

The kinematics of 19 knees were investigated under fluoroscopy during squatting (weight-bearing) and active-assisted knee bending (non-weight-bearing) using two- to three-dimensional registration technique. Accordingly, range of motion, anteroposterior translation for the medial and lateral low contact points, axial rotation of the femoral component relative to the tibial component and kinematic pathway were evaluated.

FINDINGS

There was no difference in range of motion between the two states. The medial anteroposterior translation showed no significant movement with no anterior translation in both the weight-bearing and non-weight-bearing from 0° to 90° of flexion. Regarding the lateral anteroposterior translation, a posterior translation was observed during weight-bearing, whereas a slight anterior translation from 0° to 30° of flexion and subsequent posterior translation were found in the non-weight-bearing. Femoral external rotation was observed in the weight-bearing, whereas femoral internal rotation was seen from 0° to 30° of flexion and subsequent femoral external rotation was observed in the non-weight-bearing. The kinematic pathway showed medial pivot motion and subsequent bicondylar rollback in the weight-bearing, whereas only medial pivot motion was observed in the non-weight-bearing.

INTERPRETATION

The medial anteroposterior translation of the femur during deep knee bending showed no anterior motion in the two states. The lateral anteroposterior translation and femoral rotation were different in the mid-flexion range between the two states.

Moderate External Rotation of Tibial Component Generates More Natural Kinematics Than Internal Rotation After Total Knee Arthroplasty

This study aimed to investigate the influence of tibial malrotation on knee kinematics after total knee arthroplasty (TKA). A symmetric fixed-bearing posterior-stabilized prosthesis was implanted in the validated knee model with different rotational alignments of the tibial component (neutral, 3° external rotation, 5° external rotation, 3° internal rotation, and 5° internal rotation). Computational kinematic simulations were used to evaluate the postoperative kinematics of the knee joint including anteroposterior translation femoral condyles and axial rotation of tibial component during 0°–135° knee flexion. The results revealed that the neutral position of the tibial component was not the closest kinematics to the intact knee, the model with 5° external rotation of the tibial component showed the closest lateral condyle translation and tibial axial rotation, and moderate external rotation could improve the kinematics after TKA.

Gait and Knee Flexion In Vivo Kinematics of Asymmetric Tibial Polyethylene Geometry Cruciate Retaining Total Knee Arthroplasty

The preservation of the posterior cruciate ligament in cruciate retaining (CR) total knee arthroplasty (TKA) designs has the potential to restore healthy knee biomechanics; however, concerns related to kinematic asymmetries during functional activities still exist in unilateral TKA patients. As there is a limited data available regarding the ability of the contemporary CR TKA design with concave medial and convex lateral tibial polyethylene bearing components to restore healthy knee biomechanics, this study aimed to investigate in vivo three-dimensional knee kinematics in CR TKA patients during strenuous knee flexion activities and gait. Using a combined computer tomography and dual fluoroscopic imaging system approach, in vivo kinematics of 15 unilateral CR TKA patients (comparison of replaced and contralateral nonreplaced knee) were evaluated during sit-to-stand, step-ups, single-leg deep lunge, and level walking. The patient cohort was followed-up at an average of 24.5 months ( ± 12.6, range 13-42) from surgical procedure. Significantly smaller internal knee rotation angles were observed for the contemporary CR TKA design during step-ups (2.6 ± 5.8 vs. 6.3 ± 6.6 degrees, p < 0.05) and gait (0.6 ± 4.6 vs. 6.3 ± 6.8 degrees, p < 0.05). Significantly larger proximal and anterior femoral translations were measured during sit-to-stand (34.7 ± 4.5 vs. 29.9 ± 3.1 mm, p < 0.05; -2.5 ± 2.9 vs. -8.1 ± 4.4 mm, p < 0.05) and step-ups (34.1 ± 4.5 vs. 30.8 ± 2.9 mm, p < 0.05; 2.2 ± 3.2 vs. -3.5 ± 4.5 mm, p < 0.05). Significantly smaller ranges of varus/valgus and internal/external rotation range of motion were observed for CR TKA, when compared with the nonoperated nee, during strenuous activities and gait. The preservation of the posterior cruciate ligament in the contemporary asymmetric bearing geometry CR TKA design with concave medial and convex lateral tibial polyethylene bearing components has the potential to restore healthy knee biomechanics; however, the study findings demonstrate that native knee kinematics were not fully restored in patients with unilateral asymmetric tibial polyethylene bearing geometry CR TKA during functional activities.

Kinematic comparison between asymmetrical and symmetrical polyethylene inserts during deep knee bend activity

BACKGROUND

The in vivo kinematic benefit of an asymmetrical polyethylene insert is still unknown in comparison with that of a symmetrical insert with the same femoral component design. The purpose of this study was to analyze the kinematic differences between symmetrical and asymmetrical polyethylene inserts and to detect the kinematic benefit in the asymmetrical polyethylene insert. The hypotheses are that greater axial rotation and more posterior rollback are observed in the asymmetrical polyethylene insert.

METHODS

The patients were randomly allocated to the following two groups: total knee arthroplasty with a symmetrical insert and with an asymmetrical insert. In vivo knee kinematics was analyzed in asymmetrical (17 knees) and symmetrical (16 knees) inserts using an image matching technique. The symmetrical polyethylene insert had the same geometry on both sides, whereas the asymmetrical polyethylene insert had a flat surface on the postero-lateral side. The anterior/posterior position and axial rotation were compared between the two polyethylene inserts.

RESULTS

The femoral component was significantly positioned posteriorly at 70° (p = 0.016) and 80° (p = 0.040) of knee flexion and externally rotated at 80° of knee flexion (p = 0.040) in the asymmetrical polyethylene insert as compared to the position of the symmetrical polyethylene insert. Femoral rollback and axial rotation from full extension to maximum flexion were greater in the asymmetrical polyethylene insert, although the difference was not significant.

CONCLUSIONS

In the asymmetrical polyethylene insert, slight kinematic benefit with greater axial rotation and more posterior rollback was observed in comparison with the symmetrical polyethylene insert. Further research should be required whether the kinematic benefit of an asymmetrical polyethylene insert will lead to better patient satisfaction and function.

Stress Radiograph Confirmation of Translational Instability After Cruciate-Retaining Total Knee Arthroplasty

INTRODUCTION

Late rupture of the posterior cruciate ligament (PCL) in cruciate-retaining total knee arthroplasty (TKA) can lead to increased AP instability. This results in increased stress on the medial hamstrings resulting in hamstring-based pain. We looked to identify patients with late PCL failure using a lateral stress radiograph.

METHODS

A prospective cohort analysis was completed at a single institution. Eligible patients were divided into two groups based on the amount of anterior knee pain. Pain was defined as a visual analog scale of greater than or equal to 3. Each group completed a visual analog scale, Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score Junior, Patient-Reported Outcome Measurement Information System score and underwent a lateral posterior stress/nonstress radiograph. Amount of posterior translation and posterior tibial slope was measured.

RESULTS

Patients who had painful TKAs at the follow-up had lower Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score Junior (45.86 ± 13.52 versus 78.00 ± 13.26 P < 0.001). Those patients were also found to have significantly higher posterior tibial translation with stress radiograph (6.89 ± 1.874 versus 3.91 ± 2.15 mm P < 0.001) and significantly increased tibial slope (6.51 ± 2.37° versus 3.98 ± 1.79°, P = 0.004). Seven of the 14 patients in the pain group underwent revision surgery, with 6 patients found to have incompetent PCLs.

DISCUSSION

Patients with increased AP translation and increased posterior tibial slope after cruciate-retaining TKA are likely to have worse pain and outcome measures.

Comparison of Biomechanical Gait Parameters and Patient-Reported Outcome in Patients After Total Knee Arthroplasty With the Use of Fixed-Bearing Medial Pivot and Multi-radius Design Implants—Retrospective Matched-Cohort Study

Background

Total knee arthroplasty (TKA) is considered to be highly successful in treatment of end-stage osteoarthritis. There are multiple implant designs available on the market, and it is difficult to point which one is the best. The aim of this study was to compare the clinical and functional outcomes and gait pattern after TKA with the use of fixed-bearing medial pivot (K-Mod) vs multi-radius design (NexGen) implants and to compare them to norms for healthy patients with no osteoarthritis or arthroplasty procedure in anamnesis.

Methods

A group of 30 patients who received the medial pivot (MP) TKA and 33 patients who received the posterior-stabilized (PS) TKA between May and August of 2018 were included. All surgeries were performed in the level III academic hospital by a single surgeon. Every patient was asked to fulfill the The Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Arthritis Index (WOMAC) questionnaire preoperatively and 2 years postoperatively. Standard X-ray, biomechanical gait analysis using a motion capture system, and statistical analysis were performed at 2 years postoperatively.

Results

A total of 28 patients from either MP cohort (93%) or PS (85%) matched-control cohort completed the whole assessment at the final follow-up. There were statistically significant differences in a few gait parameters such as shorter mean step length both in operated and healthy limb, lower mean gait velocity, and lower mean walking cadence than the norm in both MP and PS groups. As to the WOMAC score, there was statistically significant improvement in both groups comparing preoperative and postoperative outcomes. Nevertheless, in the MP group, there was a significantly higher score, indicating worse outcomes, in the stiffness part of the WOMAC score than in the PS group. No significant differences were found between groups during radiological evaluation.

Conclusions

There were satisfying and promising clinical, radiographic, and patient-reported outcomes in both MP and PS groups with very little difference in relation to norm values. However, both implants failed in fully restoring gait patterns similar to the healthy limb of the same patient.

Comparison of posterior cruciate retention and substitution in total knee arthroplasty during gait: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Background

To compare the gait patterns between posterior cruciate retention and substitution in total knee arthroplasty (TKA).

Methods

Electronic databases including the PubMed, Embase, CINAHL, Web of Science, and Cochrane databases were searched to identify clinical trials investigating posterior cruciate retention versus substitution in TKA. The outcome measurements were the kinematic gait parameters (flexion at heel strike, maximum flexion during loading response, flexion range during loading, minimal flexion at terminal stance, maximal flexion at the swing, and total flexion during the gait cycle), Knee Society Score (KSS), knee flexion, knee extension, and walking speed. Statistical software Review Manager 5.4 and Stata 14.0 were used for data analysis.

Results

There were finally 9 studies included in this meta-analysis. The results did not reveal differences between posterior cruciate retention (CR) and posterior cruciate substitution (PS) groups in TKA, in terms of kinematic gait parameters, knee extension, walking speed, and KSS. However, the PS group had a significantly larger knee flexion angle than that in the CR group [weighted mean difference = − 3.20, 95% CI − 6.13 to − 0.28, P = 0.03].

Conclusion

Both the posterior cruciate retention and posterior cruciate substitution lead to obvious improvements in patient function and have their advantages in getting a good cup position. The PS design is significantly better on the knee flexion, while there are no statistical differences in kinematic gait parameters and outcome scores between them. This might indicate that surgeons do not necessarily need a PS design to substitute the posterior cruciate ligament during TKA.

Bicompartmental, medial and patellofemoral knee replacement might be able to maintain unloaded knee kinematics

INTRODUCTION

Unicompartmental knee arthroplasty (UKA) and total knee arthroplasty (TKA) are standard procedures for treating knee joint arthritis. Neither UKA nor TKA seems to be optimally suited for patients with bicompartmental osteoarthritis that affects only the medial and patellofemoral compartments. A bicompartmental knee arthroplasty (BKA) was designed for this patient group. This study aimed to compare the effectiveness of a BKA and TKA in restoring the kinematics of the knee joint.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

In this in vitro study, three types of knee arthroplasties (BKA, posterior cruciate ligament-retaining, and posterior cruciate ligament-resecting TKA) were biomechanically tested in six freshly frozen human cadaveric specimens. Complete three-dimensional kinematics was analyzed for each knee arthroplasty during both passive and loaded conditions in a validated knee kinematics rig. Infrared motion capture cameras and retroreflective markers were used for recording data.

RESULTS

No significant differences could be found between the three types of arthroplasties. However, similar kinematic changes between BKA and a native knee joint were documented under passive conditions. However, in a weight-bearing mode, a significant decrease in femoral rotation during the range of motion was found in arthroplasties compared to the native knee, probably caused by contraction of the quadriceps femoris muscle, which leads to a decrease in the anterior translation of the tibia.

CONCLUSIONS

Kinematics similar to that of the natural knee can be achieved by BKA under passive conditions. However, no functional advantage of BKA over TKA was detected, which suggests that natural knee kinematics cannot be fully imitated by an arthroplasty yet. Further prospective studies are required to determine the anatomic and design factors that might affect the physiologic kinematics.

Survivorship Comparisons of Ultracongruent, Cruciate-Retaining and Posterior-Stabilized Tibial Inserts Using a Single Knee System Design: Results From the Australian Orthopedic Association National Joint Replacement Registry

BACKGROUND

Ultracongruent (UC) tibial inserts can increase knee replacement stability, but how survivorship compares to cruciate retaining (CR) or posterior stabilized (PS) inserts is unclear.

METHODS

Data from a large joint registry were used to calculate the cumulative percent revision of a single popular knee design used with different inserts. There were 67,523 procedures, of which 12,434 were UC, 21,635 CR, and 33,454 PS. Revision rates and reasons for revision were analyzed.

RESULTS

The cumulative percent revision at 18 years was 8.3% for UC, 9.2% for CR, and 8.9% for PS. There was no difference when UC was compared to CR, but PS had a higher risk of revision. Revision reasons were similar.

CONCLUSION

Compared to the CR, an UC insert did not increase revision rates and was actually lower than a PS insert. An UC insert does not compromise long-term total knee arthroplasty survivorship in the Genesis II prosthesis.

Effect of weight-bearing in bicruciate-retaining total knee arthroplasty during high-flexion activities

BACKGROUND

To evaluate the effect of weight-bearing on the kinematics of the bicruciate-retaining total knee arthroplasty design during high knee flexion activities.

METHODS

The kinematics of 21 bicruciate-retaining total knee arthroplasties were evaluated under fluoroscopy, with two- and three-dimensional image registrations, during squatting (weight-bearing) and active-assisted knee flexion (non-weight-bearing). The following variables were measured: knee range of motion, axis of femoral rotation and varus-valgus angle relative to the tibial component, anteroposterior translation of the medial and lateral contact points, and the kinematic pathway of the joint surfaces.

FINDINGS

From 20° to 100° of flexion, the femoral external rotation during weight-bearing was larger than that during non-weight-bearing. There were no differences in the varus-valgus angles between the two conditions. From 10° to 50° of flexion, the medial contact point during weight-bearing was located posterior to the point of contact during non-weight-bearing; this difference between the two weight-bearing conditions was significant. From 0° to 90° of flexion, the lateral contact point in weight-bearing was located posterior to the contact point in non-weight-bearing; this difference between the two weight-bearing conditions was also significant.

INTERPRETATION

The anteroposterior position of the medial and lateral contact points of the bicruciate-retaining total knee arthroplasty design was significantly more posterior in the mid-range of knee flexion in weight-bearing than in non-weight-bearing. However, no anterior translation of the bicruciate-retaining total knee arthroplasty design was observed. Therefore, bicruciate-retaining total knee arthroplasty appears to have good anteroposterior stability throughout the range of knee flexion, regardless of the weight-bearing condition.

Comparison of Cruciate-Sacrificing vs Posterior-Stabilized Total Knee Replacement Using a Contemporary Total Knee System

BACKGROUND

The use of highly conforming polyethylene tibial inserts in cruciate-retaining total knee arthroplasty (TKA) often requires posterior cruciate ligament (PCL) release/sacrifice for balancing (CS TKA). The CS TKA relies on the posterior capsule, collateral ligaments, and articular conformity without a cam or post to achieve stability. Using prospectively collected data we compared clinical outcomes of CS TKA to posterior-stabilized (PS) TKA utilizing a contemporary TKA system.

METHODS

Sixty-nine consecutive CS TKAs were compared to 45 consecutive PS TKAs at 2-year minimum follow-up. CS knees were balanced with the PCL released. Preoperative/postoperative range of motion (ROM), Knee Society Scores (KSS), stair function, and squatting ROM were analyzed.

RESULTS

At minimum 2-year follow up, CS and PS TKA demonstrated significant improvement in ROM (P < .001), KSS (Pain, P < .001; Function, P < .001), and KSS stair function (P < .001), with no revisions. There was no difference in preoperative to postoperative improvements for passive knee ROM (10° (0°-20°) vs 13° (5°-25°); P = .16), KSS Pain (34 (21-42) vs 38 (24-46); P = .22), KSS Function (35 (30-50) vs 35 (18-50); P = .34), and KSS stair function (10 (10-20) vs 10 (0-20); P = .37) for CS and PS TKA, respectively. CS TKA had higher squatting ROM (P = .02) at minimum 2-year follow-up compared to PS TKA.

CONCLUSION

Both PS and CS TKA provided significant improvement in clinical outcomes, with no differences in passive ROM, KSS, or stair function postoperatively. Our data support that with proper articular conformity and balancing, cruciate-retaining TKA in a PCL-deficient knee (CS TKA) is appropriate. This may be design specific and further prospective randomized studies are needed to corroborate these findings.

Custom total knee: understanding the indication and process

Patient-specific total knee arthroplasty (TKA) is a copy of the bony knee morphology based on a pre-op computer tomography (CT). The images are segmented in 3D and software is utilized through a proprietary process to generate individual total knee implants to recreate the articulating surfaces. The distal condylar valgus angle of the prosthesis is matched anatomically to the distal femur and reversely matched on the tibia with a thicker lateral insert. The implant, a set of patient-specific jigs (PSJ), which are 3D printed in nylon, and a detailed surgical plan are sent to the hospital in one box. The system is available with one solid or two separated medial and lateral PE inserts. There is a cruciate retaining (CR) and posterior stabilized (PS) version available, including various insert thicknesses. The system allows the addition of two different cemented stem extensions if needed at the time of surgery.

Anatomic vs Dome Patella: Is There a Difference Between Fixed- vs Mobile-Bearing Posterior-Stabilized Total Knee Arthroplasties?

BACKGROUND

It has been hypothesized that the patella, working in conjunction with both medial and lateral femoral condyles, can influence kinematic parameters such as posterior femoral rollback and axial rotation. The objective of this study is to determine the in vivo kinematics of subjects implanted with a fixed-bearing (FB) or mobile-bearing (MB) posterior-stabilized (PS) total knee arthroplasty (TKA), with a specific focus on evaluating the impact that Anatomic and Medialized Dome patellar components have on tibiofemoral kinematic patterns.

METHODS

Tibiofemoral kinematics were assessed for 40 subjects; 20 with an anatomic patella and 20 with a dome patella. Within these groups, 10 subjects received an FB PS TKA and 10 subjects received an MB PS TKA. All subjects were analyzed using fluoroscopy while performing a deep knee bend activity. Kinematics were collected during specific intervals to determine similarities and differences in regard to patella and bearing type.

RESULTS

The greatest variation in kinematics was detected between the 2 Anatomic patellar groups. Specifically, the MB-Anatomic subjects experienced greater translation of the lateral condyle, the highest magnitude of axial rotation, and the highest range of motion compared to the FB-Anatomic subjects. Subjects with a Dome Patella displayed much variability among the average kinematics, with all parameters between FB and MB cohorts being similar.

CONCLUSION

The findings in this study suggest that subjects with an Anatomic patellar component could have more normal kinematic patterns with an MB PS TKA as opposed to an FB PS TKA, while subjects with a Dome patella could achieve similar kinematics regardless of TKA type.

No difference in 13-year survival after medial pivot or central pivot mobile bearing total knee arthroplasty. A propensity matched comparative analysis

PURPOSE

The present study was designed to evaluate the long-term results (more than 10 years) of mobile bearing total knee arthroplasty (TKA) and to compare the survival of medial pivot axis (MPA) and central pivot axis (CPA) TKAs. The primary hypothesis was that the 10- to 15-year survival rate of MPA TKAs will be better than CPA TKAs.

METHODS

A national, multicenter, retrospective study was performed in France. In this case-control design, 1154 TKAs were paired into the CPA group (control group: 577 cases) and MPA group (study group: 577 cases) based on a logistic regression analysis of age, gender, body mass index and severity of the coronal deformity, defining the propensity score for each case. Final survival information follow-up was obtained for 946 cases (82%).

RESULTS

There was no significant difference between the control and study groups for any baseline data. Twenty-two prosthetic revisions (2%) were performed for mechanical reasons during the follow-up period. There was no significant difference between the 13-year survival rates of CPA (98%) and MPA (97%) TKAs. There was no significant difference between groups in their final Oxford and Knee Society scores.

CONCLUSION

Our findings do not support the assumption that medialization of the pivot axis of a mobile bearing TKA improves clinical results or survival.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level III.

Postoperative femoral anteroposterior position while standing correlates with the posterior tibial slope and posterior femoral condylar offset in medial pivot total knee arthroplasty

BACKGROUND

After total knee arthroplasty (TKA), the femur tends to be located posteriorly under weight-bearing (WB) conditions, and a paradoxical femoral anterior motion occurs, leading to joint instability.

OBJECTIVE

We aimed to clarify factors which affect the postoperative femoral anteroposterior position relative to the tibia under WB conditions (A-P position) in medial pivot (MP) TKA.

METHODS

Among 126 knees (81 women) with primary TKA using MP prosthesis for varus osteoarthritic knees, 70 knees had cruciate-retaining inserts (CR) with the reduced conformity and 56 knees had cruciate-substituting inserts (CS) with the full conformity. Using the three-dimensional (3D) assessment system, the associations between the A-P position and the factors including pre- and postoperative lower extremity alignment, component positions, and posterior femoral condylar offset (PCO), were assessed regarding the type of inserts.

RESULTS

Significant correlations were seen between the A-P position and posterior tibial slope (PTS), medial PCO, and lateral PCO. Regarding the difference between the two inserts, the PTS, medial PCO, and lateral PCO significantly correlated with the A-P position in the CR, but only the PTS correlated in the CS.

CONCLUSIONS

The increased PTS and decreased PCO were the dominant factors for the A-P position in MP TKA.

Assessment of paradoxical anterior translation in a CR total knee prosthesis coupling dynamic RSA and FE techniques

Purpose

The study aims were to assess the kinematic data, Internal-External (IE) rotation, and Antero-Posterior (AP) translation of the contact points between the femoral condyles and polyethylene insert and to develop a combined dynamic RSA-FE (Radiostereometric – Finite Element) model that gives results congruent with the literature.

Methods

A cohort of 15 patients who underwent cemented cruciate-retaining highly congruent mobile-bearing total knee arthroplasty were analyzed during a sit-to-stand motor task. The kinematical data from Dynamic RSA were used as input for a patient-specific FE model to calculate condylar contact points between the femoral component and polyethylene insert.

Results

The femoral component showed an overall range about 4 mm of AP translation during the whole motor task, and the majority of the movement was after 40° of flexion. Concerning the IE rotation, the femoral component started from an externally rotate position (− 6.7 ± 10°) at 80° of flexion and performed an internal rotation during the entire motor task. The overall range of the IE rotation was 8.2°.

Conclusions

During the sit to stand, a slight anterior translation from 40° to 0° of flexion of the femoral component with respect to polyethylene insert, which could represent a paradoxical anterior translation. Despite a paradoxical anterior femoral translation was detected, the implants were found to be stable. Dynamic RSA and FE combined technique could provide information about prosthetic component’s stress and strain distribution and the influence of the different designs during the movement.

Effects of Posterior Tibial Slope on a Posterior Cruciate Retaining Total Knee Arthroplasty Kinematics and Kinetics

BACKGROUND

It has been hypothesized that increasing posterior tibial slope can influence condylar rollback and play a role in increasing knee flexion. However, the effects of tibial slope on knee kinematics are not well studied. The objective of this study is to assess the effects of tibial slope on femorotibial kinematics and kinetics for a posterior cruciate retaining total knee arthroplasty design.

METHODS

A validated forward solution model of the knee was implemented to predict the femorotibial biomechanics of a posterior cruciate retaining total knee arthroplasty with varied posterior slopes of 0°-8° at 2° intervals. All analyses were conducted on a weight-bearing deep knee bend activity.

RESULTS

Increasing the tibial slope shifted the femoral component posteriorly at full extension but decreased the overall femoral rollback throughout flexion. With no tibial slope, the lateral condyle contacted the polyethylene 6 mm posterior of the midline, but as the slope increased to 8°, the femur shifted an extra 5 mm, to 11 mm posterior of the tibial midline. Similar shifts were observed for the medial condyle, ranging from 7 mm posterior to 13 mm posterior, respectively. Increasing posterior slope decreased the posterior cruciate ligament tension and femorotibial contact force.

CONCLUSION

The results of this study revealed that, although increasing the tibial slope shifted the femur posteriorly at full extension and maximum flexion, it reduced the amount of femoral rollback. Despite the lack of rollback, a more posterior location of condyles suggests lower chances of bearing impingement of the posterior femur and may explain why increasing slope may lead to higher knee flexion.

Weight-bearing status affects in vivo kinematics following mobile-bearing unicompartmental knee arthroplasty

PURPOSE

The effects of weight bearing (WB) on knee kinematics following mobile-bearing unicompartmental knee arthroplasty (UKA) remain unknown. The purpose of this study was to clarify the effects of WB on in vivo kinematics of mobile-bearing UKA during high knee flexion activities.

METHODS

The kinematics of UKA were evaluated under fluoroscopy during squatting (WB) and active-assisted knee flexion (non-weight bearing, NWB). Range of motion, femoral axis rotation relative to the tibia, anteroposterior (AP) translation of the medial and lateral sides, and kinematic pathway were measured.

RESULTS

There were no differences in knee flexion range and external rotation of the femur in each flexion angle between the WB conditions. The amount of femoral external rotation between minimum flexion and 60° of flexion during WB was significantly larger than that during NWB, and that between 60° and 130° of flexion during NWB was significantly larger than that during WB. There were no differences in medial AP translation of the femur in each flexion angle between the WB conditions. However, on the lateral side, posterior translation of 52.9 ± 12.7% was observed between minimum flexion and 130° of flexion during WB. During NWB, there was no significant translation between minimum flexion and 60° of flexion; beyond 60° of flexion, posterior translation was 41.6 ± 8.7%. Between 20° and 80° of flexion, the lateral side in WB was located more posteriorly than in NWB (p < 0.05).

CONCLUSION

Mobile-bearing UKA has good anterior stability throughout the range of knee flexion. WB status affects the in vivo kinematics following mobile-bearing UKA.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

III.

In vivo kinematics of a newly updated posterior-stabilised mobile-bearing total knee arthroplasty in weight-bearing and non-weight-bearing high-flexion activities

BACKGROUND

The purpose of this study was to clarify the in vivo kinematics of a newly updated posterior-stabilised (PS) mobile-bearing total knee arthroplasty during high-flexion activities in weight-bearing (WB) and non-weight-bearing (NWB) conditions. The hypothesis was that the kinematics would differ between the WB and NWB conditions, and the kinematics would be affected by the WB condition.

METHODS

The kinematics of 19 knees were investigated under fluoroscopy during squatting (WB) and active-assisted knee flexion (NWB) with two- and three-dimensional registration technique. Accordingly, the range of motion, anteroposterior (AP) translation of the medial and lateral contact points, axial rotation of the femoral component relative to the tibial component, and kinematic pathway were evaluated.

RESULTS

There was no difference in the knee's range of motion between the WB and NWB conditions. The medial AP translation of the femur did not differ in each flexion angle between WB and NWB conditions except for flexions of 70°. There was no difference in the lateral AP translation of the femur at all tested flexion angles between the WB and NWB conditions. The external femoral rotation and the medial pivot motion were observed throughout all flexion angles in WB conditions. The clinical relevance is that this implant could produce ideal medial AP stability and medial pivot motion.

CONCLUSION

The medial AP translation of the femur was stable for AP direction when it was in both WB and NWB conditions. In WB conditions, the medial pivot motion was observed throughout all flexion angles.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

III.

Midterm Outcomes and Survivorship of Anterior Stabilized Versus Cruciate Retaining Bearing in Primary Total Knee Arthroplasty

BACKGROUND

There has been increasing utilization of ultracongruent bearings with a cruciate retaining (CR) femoral component in primary total knee arthroplasty. The purpose of this study is to compare outcomes and survivorship between an ultracongruent anterior stabilized (AS) and CR bearing.

METHODS

A retrospective review was performed from 2010 through 2014 of all primary total knee arthroplasties with a single knee systems identical CR femur and AS or CR bearing with minimum 2-year follow-up yielding a study cohort of 3323 patients (4164 knees). Knee range of motion, Knee Society pain scores, Knee Society clinical scores, Knee Society functional scores, and University of California Los Angeles activity scores were evaluated. The need for manipulation under anesthesia (MUA), nonrevision surgery and revisions were assessed.

RESULTS

AS bearing was used in 1471 knees (35%) and CR bearing used in 2693 knees (65%). Mean follow-up was 5.4 years. The AS group had significantly higher improvements in knee range of motion, Knee Society clinical, Knee Society functional, and Knee Society pain scores. MUAs were performed on 120 knees (8.2%) in the AS group compared with 158 knees (5.9%) in the CR group (P = .005). The AS group had significantly less all-cause failure, aseptic failures, revisions for instability, and revisions for isolated polyethylene wear. The 10-year aseptic survival for AS was 98.3% and for 92.3% for the CR group (P = .002).

CONCLUSION

These mid-term results demonstrate the AS bearing had significantly higher improvements in clinical and functional outcomes as well as greater survivorship. Knees in which an AS bearing was used did have a higher incidence of MUA.

In Vivo Kinematics of Bicruciate-Retaining Total Knee Arthroplasty with Anatomical Articular Surface under High-Flexion Conditions

Bicruciate-retaining total knee arthroplasty (BCR-TKA) recreates normal knee movement by preserving the anterior cruciate and posterior cruciate ligaments. However, in vivo kinematics of BCR-TKA with the anatomical articular surface remains unknown. The objective of this study was to evaluate in vivo kinematics of BCR-TKA with the anatomical articular surface during high-flexion activities. For this purpose, 17 knees after BCR-TKA with an anatomical articular surface were examined. Under fluoroscopy, each patient performed squatting and cross-legged sitting motions. To estimate the spatial position and orientation of the knee, a two-dimensional or three-dimensional registration technique was used. Rotation, varus-valgus angle, and anteroposterior translation of medial and lateral contact points of the femoral component relative to the tibial component were evaluated in each flexion angle. The results showed that from 80 to 110° of flexion, the femoral external rotation during squatting was significantly larger than that during cross-legged sitting. At maximum flexion, the knees during sitting indicated significantly more varus alignment than during squatting. During squatting, a medial pivot pattern was observed from minimum flexion to 10° flexion, with no significant movement beyond 10° of flexion. Conversely, during cross-legged sitting, no significant movement was detected from minimum flexion to 60° of flexion, with a medial pivot beyond 60° of flexion. Therefore, the knees showed relatively normal kinematics after BCR-TKA with an anatomical articular surface; however, it varied during high-flexion activities depending on the activity.

Mid-flexion stability in the anteroposterior plane is achieved with a medial congruent insert in cruciate-retaining total knee arthroplasty for varus osteoarthritis

PURPOSE

This study aimed to compare the intraoperative kinematics, especially for mid-flexion femorotibial anteroposterior (AP) stability, between newly developed medial congruent (MC) inserts and cruciate-retaining (CR) inserts in navigated cruciate-retaining total knee arthroplasty (CR-TKA).

METHODS

Thirty consecutive patients with varus osteoarthritis undergoing CR-TKA using an image-free navigation system were enrolled. AP kinematics, the AP translation under manual maximum stress to the knee joint at 45° flexion, rotational kinematics, and varus-valgus laxity were evaluated using a navigation system and statistically compared between the MC and CR inserts.

RESULTS

AP kinematic analysis showed that the femoral position with the CR insert was significantly anterior at a maximum extension to 45° flexion compared with the MC insert (p < 0.05). The amount of AP translation at 45° flexion with the MC insert was significantly smaller than that with the CR insert (p < 0.05). Rotational kinematics found that the tibial position at maximum extension was significantly externally rotated with the MC inserts than with the CR inserts. Varus-valgus laxity was comparable between the MC and CR inserts.

CONCLUSION

The current results showed that greater mid-flexion AP stability was achieved with the MC inserts than with the CR inserts in CR-TKA. Intraoperative kinematics with the MC inserts more closely resembled those with preoperative conditions in CR-TKA.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

III, prospective comparative study.

Comparison of clinical and radiographic results between total knee arthroplasties using medial pivot and posterior-stabilized prosthesis: A meta-analysis

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the clinical and radiographic outcomes of total knee arthroplasties (TKA) between using medial-pivot (MP) and posterior-stabilized (PS) prosthesis. Does MP prosthesis and PS prosthesis influence the clinical results of a TKA?

METHODS

An electronic literature search of PubMed Medline and the Cochrane Library was performed from inception to October 1, 2019. A meta-analysis to compare postoperative outcomes of Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) score, Knee Society Score (KSS), range of motion (ROM), complications, and radiographic results between MP and PS prosthesis were conducted.

RESULTS

Seven eligible studies involving 934 adult patients (MP group, n = 461; PS group, n = 473) were identified for analysis. This study showed no significant difference between the 2 groups in the WOMAC scores, KSS, ROM, and complications (P > .05). The differences of the femorotibial angle, position of implant, and patellar tilt were also not significant between the 2 groups (P > .05).

CONCLUSION

The present meta-analysis has shown that patients with the MP prosthesis have similar clinical results as patients with PS prosthesis. Furthermore, the radiographic results, especially patella tilt angle, were also similar between the 2 groups. Therefore, surgeons should be aware that the types of prostheses are not a decisive factor to ensure successful operation.

Insufficient lateral joint laxity after bicruciate-retaining total knee arthroplasty potentially influences kinematics during flexion: A biomechanical cadaveric study

BACKGROUND

Soft tissue balancing in bicruciate-retaining (BCR) total knee arthroplasty (TKA) is a challenge that must be overcome to achieve excellent clinical outcomes. However, the optimal degree of joint laxity has yet to be clarified. This cadaveric study sought to examine joint laxity after BCR TKA using a navigation system.

METHODS

Knee joint laxity was quantified using an image-free navigation system in 8 intact fresh frozen cadavers under three conditions: the native knee, BCR TKA knee, and BCR TKA knee after anterior cruciate ligament resection. Rotational kinematics in the BCR TKA knee during flexion were compared according to whether joint laxity was increased or decreased.

RESULTS

Knee joint laxity after BCR TKA under varus-valgus movement, anterior translation, and internal-external rotation loadings was similar to that of the native knee. However, lateral joint laxity was decreased during flexion in some cases. BCR TKA-treated knees with decreased lateral joint laxity at 90° of flexion demonstrated more limited tibial internal rotation in deep flexion than the native knee (p < 0.05). The loss of internal rotation in deep flexion was partly recovered by using a lateral insert with a posterior slope of +3°.

CONCLUSIONS

Restoring optimal joint laxity was not always straightforward in BCR TKA if the 4 ligaments were preserved. Lateral joint laxity was potentially decreased in BCR TKA and may result in kinematic conflict during flexion. Surgeons should be aware of the need to achieve sufficient lateral joint laxity in this type of BCR TKA.

Videofluoroscopic Evaluation of the Influence of a Gradually Reducing Femoral Radius on Joint Kinematics During Daily Activities in Total Knee Arthroplasty

BACKGROUND

Paradoxical anterior translation in midflexion is reduced in total knee arthroplasties (TKAs) with a gradually reducing femoral radius, when compared to a 2-radii design. This reduction has been shown in finite element model simulations, in vitro tests, intraoperatively, and recently also in vivo during a lunge and unloaded flexion-extension. However, TKA kinematics are task dependent and this reduction has not been tested for gait activities.

METHODS

Thirty good outcome subjects (≥1 year postoperatively) with a unilateral cruciate-retaining TKA with a gradually reducing (n = 15) or dual (n = 15) femoral radius design were assessed during 5 complete cycles of level walking, stair descent (0.18-m steps), deep knee bend, and sitting down onto and standing up from a chair, using a moving fluoroscope (25 Hz, 1 ms shutter time). Kinematic data were extracted by 2D/3D image registration.

RESULTS

Tibiofemoral ranges of motion for flexion-extension, abduction-adduction, internal-external rotation, and anteroposterior (AP) translation were similar for both groups, whereas the pattern of AP translation-flexion-coupling differed. The subjects with the dual-radii design showed a sudden change in direction of AP translation around 30° of flexion, which was not present in the subjects with the gradually reducing femoral radius design.

CONCLUSION

Through the unique ability of moving fluoroscopy, the present study confirmed that the gradually reducing femoral radii eliminated the paradoxical sudden anterior translation at 30° present in the dual-radii design in vivo during daily activities, including gait and stair descent.

Kinematic and Kinetic Waveform Changes of the Knee Joint Following a Mobile Bearing Total Knee Arthroplasty-Gait Analysis and Single Step Ascent

The objective of this study is to analyze the kinetic and kinematic changes of the osteoarthritic knee after a mobile bearing total knee arthroplasty. Kinematic and kinetic gait analysis of level walking was performed in 15 patients (eight female and seven male) with knee ostoarthritis. All patients were free of any neurological diseases that could affect their normal gait. Mean age was 68.6 ± 5.2 years, mean height 159.8 ± 6.9 cm, and mean weight was 78.5 ± 10.1 kg. Full body gait analysis was performed using the BioKin three-dimensional (3D) motion analysis system preoperatively and 9 months after total knee arthroplasty. A single-step ascending kinetic analysis and a plantar pressure distribution analysis were also performed in all patients. An increased average cadence (mean 99.39 step/min preoperatively and 104.64 step/min postoperatively; p = 0.152), step length (0.44 m preoperatively and 0.52 m postoperatively; p < 0.001), stride length (0.89 m preoperatively and 1.0 m postoperatively; p < 0.007), and walking velocity (0.73 m/sec preoperatively and 0.90 m/sec postoperatively; p = 0.005) were noted postoperatively and postoperatively. A decrease in the stance duration percentage and the knee adduction moment was also reported postoperatively. All patients showed a significant improvement of knee kinetics and kinematics after a mobile bearing total knee arthroplasty. Statistically significant differences were found in the step length, stride length, and walk velocity postoperatively. The knee adduction moment was also significantly reduced. Further research is warranted to determine the clinical relevance of these findings. This study is a prospective comparative one and reflects level II evidence.

Contact kinematics of patient-specific instrumentation versus conventional instrumentation for total knee arthroplasty

BACKGROUND

The goal was to evaluate the joint contact kinematics of total knee arthroplasties implanted using patient-specific instrumentation (PSI) compared to conventional instrumentation (CI). We hypothesized that use of PSI would not significantly alter contact kinematics.

METHODS

The study was a prospective randomized controlled trial, with equal allocation of fifty patients to PSI and CI groups. At two years post-operation, patients underwent weight-bearing stereo X-ray examinations at 0°, 20°, 40°, 60°, 80°, and 100° of flexion. The shortest tibiofemoral distance on each condyle determined the contact location. Magnitude of the shortest distance was measured and condylar separation was analyzed using thresholds of 0.5 and 0.75 mm. Kinematic measurements derived from the shortest distance included anteroposterior (AP) translation, excursion, axial rotation, and paradoxical anterior motion. Pivot position and cam/post contact were also investigated.

RESULTS

There were no differences (p > 0.05) in medial and lateral AP contact locations, excursions, and magnitude of anterior motion, or in axial rotation, pivot patterns, frequency of cam/post engagement, frequency of medial anterior motion, and condylar separation at a 0.75 mm threshold. Significant differences were found in frequency of lateral anterior motion (p = 0.048) and condylar separation at a 0.5 mm threshold (p = 0.010). Both groups displayed typical kinematics for a fixed-bearing posterior-stabilized implant.

CONCLUSIONS

We found no major differences in knee kinematics between PSI and CI groups, which suggest that PSI does not provide a significant kinematic advantage over conventional instruments.

Small differences in tibial contact locations following kinematically aligned TKA from the native contralateral knee

PURPOSE

Kinematically aligned (KA) TKA strives to restore native limb and knee alignments without ligament release with the premise that knee function likewise will be closely restored to native to the extent enabled by the components used. This study determined differences in anterior-posterior (AP) tibial contact locations of a KA TKA performed with asymmetric, fixed bearing, posterior cruciate-retaining (PCR) components from those of the native contralateral knee and also determined the incidence of posterior rim contact of the tibial insert during a deep knee bend and a step-up.

METHODS

Both knees were imaged using single-plane fluoroscopy for 25 patients with a calipered KA TKA and a native knee in the contralateral limb. AP tibial contact locations in each compartment were determined following 3D model-to-2D image registration. Differences in mean AP tibial contact locations in each compartment between the KA TKA knees and the native contralateral knees were analysed. Contact locations either on or beyond the most posterior point of the tibial insert determined the occurrence of posterior rim contact.

RESULTS

Mean AP tibial contact locations for both native and KA TKA knees remained relatively centred in the medial compartment but moved posterior in the lateral compartment during flexion. In both the medial and lateral compartments, differences in mean AP tibial contact locations between the KA TKA knees and the native contralateral knees were more posterior and greatest at 0° flexion for both activities (4 mm, p = 0.0009 and 7 mm, p < 0.0001 for deep knee bend and 6 mm, p < 0.0001 and 8 mm, p < 0.0001 for step-up in the medial and lateral compartments, respectively). The incidence of posterior rim contact of the tibial insert was 16% (4 of 25 patients) but the lowest Oxford Knee Score was 43 for these patients. The median Oxford Knee Score for all patients was 46 (out of 48).

CONCLUSIONS

Calipered KA TKA with asymmetric, fixed bearing, PCR components resulted in mean AP tibial contact locations which were relatively centred in the compartments and differed at most from those of the native contralateral knee by approximately 15% of the AP dimension of a mid-sized tibial baseplate. Although posterior rim contact occurred in some patients, all such patients had high patient-reported outcome scores.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Therapeutic, Level III.

Intraoperative posterior movement of the tibia at 90° of flexion predicts worse postoperative flexion angles in cruciate-substituting total knee arthroplasty

PURPOSE

To investigate the correlation between intraoperative tibiofemoral anteroposterior changes at 90° of flexion and postoperative maximum flexion angles in navigated cruciate-substituting TKA. The hypothesis of this study was that intraoperative tibiofemoral anteroposterior changes at 90° of flexion indirectly reflect posterior cruciate ligament (PCL) function and associate with postoperative maximum flexion angles.

METHODS

Fifty-five consecutive patients with varus osteoarthritis treated with primary TKA were retrospectively analysed. All patients received the same type of implant, placed with an image-free navigation system. The PCL was retained, and cruciate-substituting inserts were used in all cases. The mean follow-up was 44 ± 8 months. The preoperative and postoperative kinematics were measured intraoperatively with a navigation system, and the preoperative and postoperative tibiofemoral anteroposterior positions at 90° of flexion were determined. The correlation between intraoperative anteroposterior position changes and postoperative maximum flexion angles was investigated. The correlation between the change of anteroposterior position and tibiofemoral rotational angles was also assessed.

RESULTS

The intraoperative anteroposterior position change was -1.7 ± 3.4 mm (a positive value indicates tibial posterior shift). Flexion angle improvement was negatively correlated with intraoperative change of tibiofemoral anteroposterior position (R² = 0.17, p < 0.005). Postoperative maximum flexion angles were also negatively correlated with intraoperative change of tibiofemoral anteroposterior position (R² = 0.09, p < 0.05). The postoperative amount of tibial internal rotation was positively correlated with the preoperative amount (R² = 0.60, p < 0.0001); however, the intraoperative anteroposterior position change was not correlated with the postoperative amount of tibial internal rotation (n.s.).

CONCLUSION

A navigation system may be able to indirectly evaluate PCL function and predict the postoperative flexion angles in cruciate-substituting TKA. Intraoperative posterior movement of the tibia at 90° of flexion predicts worse postoperative flexion angles in cruciate-substituting TKA.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level 3, retrospective comparative study.

Bicruciate-retaining total knee arthroplasty reproduces in vivo kinematics of normal knees to a lower extent than unicompartmental knee arthroplasty

PURPOSE

This study aimed to clarify the natural knee kinematics provided by bicruciate-retaining total knee arthroplasty (BCR-TKA) compared with those of unicompartmental knee arthroplasty (UKA) and normal knees.

METHODS

Volunteers and patients who had undergone UKA and BCR-TKA with anatomical articular surface performed squatting motion under fluoroscopy. To estimate the knee's spatial position and orientation, a two-dimensional/three-dimensional registration technique was used. The rotation angle and anteroposterior translation of the medial and lateral sides of the femur relative to the tibia in each flexion angle were directly evaluated using the same local coordinate system and their differences amongst the three groups were analysed using two-way analysis of variance and Bonferroni post hoc pairwise comparison.

RESULTS

From 0° to 10° of flexion, the femoral external rotation angle of BCR-TKA knees was significantly greater than that of normal and UKA knees and the medial side of BCR-TKA knees was significantly more anteriorly located than that of normal and UKA knees. From 40° to 50° of flexion, the medial side of UKA knees was significantly more posteriorly located than that of normal and BCR-TKA knees. From 30° to 120° of flexion, the lateral side of BCR-TKA knees was significantly more anteriorly located than that of normal and UKA knees.

CONCLUSION

The in vivo kinematics of BCR-TKA knees reproduces those of normal knees to a lower extent than those of UKA knees. Thus, BCR-TKA with anatomical articular surface reproduces in vivo kinematics of normal knees to a lower extent than UKA.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

III.

Biomechanical analysis on total knee replacement patients during gait: Medial pivot or posterior stabilized design?

BACKGROUND

Total Knee Replacement surgery restores joint function in patients with advanced osteoarthritis. There are several prostheses available based on different mechanisms, which guarantee knee stability during Activities of Daily Living. The aim of this study is to compare ball-in-socket (or Medial Pivot) and post-cam mechanisms to detect possible differences in terms of biomechanical parameters between these two prosthesis designs and to evaluate which design is closer to physiological biomechanics.

METHODS

A kinematics, kinetics and electromyography lower limb analyses were performed during gait on sixty subjects: twenty with Medial Pivot prosthesis, twenty with posterior stabilized prosthesis and twenty healthy subjects to obtain a physiologic reference.

FINDINGS

Total Knee Replacement gait pattern for both patient groups were characterized by reduced walking speed, reduced stride length and increased stance time respect to control group. Comparison between Medial Pivot and Posterior Stabilized groups showed a reduction of knee flexion and flexor moment in patients with ball-in-socket mechanism. A prolonged muscular activity of rectus femoris was observed in Medial Pivot patients compared to Posterior Stabilized and control groups.

INTERPRETATION

"Stiff knee pattern" mechanism was showed for both patient groups but more enhanced in Medial Pivot patients. Even though the Posterior Stabilized design introduces the non-physiological paradoxical motion and the Medial Pivot design seems to better reproduce the physiological condylar movement as gait analysis parameters, including kinematics, kinetics and electromyographic parameters were closer to control group and, in turn, to physiological gait for the Posterior Stabilized than Medial Pivot group parameters.

Decreased Survival of Medial Pivot Designs Compared with Cruciate-retaining Designs in TKA Without Patellar Resurfacing

BACKGROUND

The medial pivot TKA design was introduced in the 1990s. These are fixed-bearing, medial-conforming implants with virtually no translation in the medial part of the knee, in contrast to the flat lateral part of the insert allowing for translation similar to the native knee during flexion and extension. Most primary TKAs performed in Norway and Australia are cruciate-retaining. All of the medial pivot implants in our study are cruciate-sacrificing but without a post-cam mechanism. The medial pivot implant design was developed to more closely mimic native knee motion, in the hope of improving function, and not primarily as a more constrained knee for difficult cases. In the past 10 to 12 years, a second-generation medial-pivot design has emerged, but there are no larger registry studies on the survival of these implants. Both cruciate-retaining and medial pivot designs are reported in the Australian and Norwegian registries, allowing for large-scale, comparative survivorship studies.

QUESTIONS/PURPOSES

(1) Is there any difference in survival between the medial pivot design and the three most commonly used cruciate-retaining TKA designs? (2) Is there any difference in survival among the different medial pivot implant designs? (3) What are the main indications for revision of medial pivot TKAs?

METHODS

Registry data from the Australian Orthopaedic Association National Joint Replacement Registry and Norwegian Arthroplasty Register from 2005 until the end of 2017 were used to compare the five different brands of medial pivot TKA designs (total primary TKAs assessed: 6310). In Australia, the study group of medial pivot implants represented 9% (6012 of 72,477) of the total number of cemented/hybrid TKAs without patellar resurfacing; 345 had cementless femoral components. In Norway, the study group represented 1% (298 of 47,820) of the total number of TKAs with cemented tibias without patellar resurfacing; all had cemented femoral components. The control group consisted of the three most commonly used cruciate-retaining TKA designs (n = 70,870; Australia n = 54,554; Norway n = 16,316). All TKAs used a fixed-bearing, cemented tibial component and did not involve patella resurfacing. Kaplan-Meier survival analysis was assessed to estimate survivorship. We compared the groups by calculating the hazard ratios (HR) using Cox regression adjusted for age, gender and preoperative diagnosis with 95% CI. To answer our third question, we calculated the percentage of each revision indication from the total number of revisions in each group, and used a Cox regression analysis to compare revision causes and HRs. Analyses were performed separately by each registry. Accounting for competing risks (Fine and Gray) did not alter our findings [].

RESULTS

After controlling for potential confounding variables such as gender, age and preoperative diagnosis, we found an increased revision risk for the medial pivot compared with cruciate-retaining TKA designs in Australia (HR 1.4 [95% CI 1.2 to 1.7]; p < 0.001), but not in Norway (HR 1.5 [95% CI 0.9 to 2.4]; p = 0.1). Two brands of the medial pivot design reported to the AOANJRR showed an increased risk of revision compared with cruciate-retaining designs: the Advance® II MP (HR 1.7 [95% CI 1.2 to 2.6]; p = 0.004) and the GMK® Sphere (HR 2.0 [95% CI 1.5 to 2.6]; p < 0.001), whereas the MRK (HR 0.7 [95% CI 0.4 to 1.5]; p = 0.4), the Evolution® MP (HR 1.4 [95% CI 1.0 to 1.9]; p = 0.06) and the SAIPH® (HR 0.9 [95% CI 0.5 to 1.5]; p = 0.7) showed no difference. The most common reasons for revision of medial pivot implants in Australia were infection (27%), pain alone (19%), patellar erosion (13%), loosening/lysis (12%); in Norway the primary indications were loosening/lysis (28%), instability (28%), malalignment (11%) and pain alone (11%).

CONCLUSIONS

The medial pivot TKA design as a group had a higher revision rate than cruciate-retaining fixed-bearing controls in TKA performed without patellar component resurfacing. By brand, the Advance II MP and the GMK Sphere had inferior survivorship, whereas the MRK, the SAIPH and the Evolution MP had no differences in survivorship compared with cruciate-retaining controls. In Australia, TKAs with the medial pivot design without patella resurfacing had a higher rate of revisions for instability, malalignment, and patella erosion. In Norway, there was an increased risk of revision for lysis and loosening compared with the cruciate-retaining design. Several of these implants had short follow-up in this study. Further registry studies with longer follow up are therefore necessary.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level III, therapeutic study.

Patient-specific instrumentation improves functional kinematics of minimally-invasive total knee replacements as revealed by computerized 3D fluoroscopy

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES

Minimally-invasive total knee arthroplasty (MIS-TKA) has demonstrated very good short-term success, but its mid- to long-term results remain inconclusive. The success may be related to the tradeoff between a small incision and accurate positioning of the implant components. Patient-specific instrumentation (PSI) aims to improve the accuracy in restoring the knee axis and the clinical outcomes for MIS-TKA, but the results are yet to be confirmed by accurate assessment during functional activities. The purpose of the current study was to measure and compare the in vivo three-dimensional (3D) rigid-body and surface kinematics of MIS-TKA implanted with and without PSI during isolated knee active flexion/extension and sit-to-stand using state-of-the-art 3D model-based fluoroscopy technology.

METHODS

Ten patients treated for advanced medial knee osteoarthritis by MIS-TKA without PSI (non-PSI group) and nine with PSI (PSI group) participated in the current study. Each subject performed non-weight-bearing knee flexion/extension and sit-to-stand tasks while the motion of the prosthetic knee was under bi-plane fluoroscopy surveillance. The computer models of each of the knee prosthesis components were registered to the measured fluoroscopy images for each time frame via a novel validated 3D fluoroscopy method. Non-parametric 1-tailed Mann-Whitney tests were performed to detect the differences in the joint and surface kinematic variables every 10° of knee flexion between the non-PSI and PSI groups. The 1-tailed significance level was at α = 0.05.

RESULTS

The PSI group showed clear, coupled flexion/internal rotation during activities, while the non-PSI group remained roughly at an externally rotated position with slight internal rotations. The coupled rotation in the PSI group was accompanied by an anterior displacement of the medial contact and a posterior displacement of the lateral contact, which was different from the screw-home mechanism. Neither of the two groups showed the normal roll-back phenomenon, i.e., posterior translation of the femur relative to the tibia during knee flexion.

CONCLUSIONS

With the state-of-the-art 3D fluoroscopy method, differences in both the rigid-body and surface kinematics of the prosthetic knees between MIS-TKA with and without PSI were identified. Patients with PSI demonstrated significant positive effects on the reconstructed rigid-body kinematics of the knee, showing clearer coupled flexion/internal rotations - an important kinematic characteristic in healthy knees - than those without PSI during activities with or without weight-bearing. However, none of them showed normal contact patterns. The current findings will be helpful for surgical instrument design, as well as for surgical decision-making in MIS total knee arthroplasty.

Systematic Review of Modular Bicompartmental Knee Arthroplasty for Medio-Patellofemoral Osteoarthritis

BACKGROUND

We aimed to locate, appraise, and synthesize the available literature to assess the functional outcome of modular bicompartmental knee arthroplasty (BKA) compared to total knee arthroplasty (TKA) for medio-patellofemoral osteoarthritis.

METHODS

After an extensive literature search based on electronic databases such as MEDLINE, EMBASE, CINAHL, and PubMed, and grey literature, 9 articles satisfied our selection criteria which included 1 randomized controlled trial, 1 prospective cohort, 3 retrospective cohort, and 4 case series. Narrative synthesis was performed due to clinical, methodological, and statistical heterogeneity among the included studies.

RESULTS

There were 331 participants (341 knees) in this systematic review. BKA group included 229 patients (239 knees) and TKA group included 102 patients (102 knees). The quality of included studies ranged from moderate to very low as per GRADE (grading of recommendations, assessment, development, and evaluation working group) score with low to high risk of bias. Most of the studies showed comparable functional outcome in BKA compared to TKA such as Knee Society Score, Knee Osteoarthritis and Outcome Score, Short Form-36 score, and revision surgery in short-term to midterm follow-up. BKA patients achieved better range of movement and forgotten knee status than TKA patients. It resulted in longer operative time, but less intraoperative blood loss. Long-term series showed 95.1% survivorship of BKA at 5 years and 58% at 17 years.

CONCLUSION

Current evidence suggests that modular BKA provides comparable functional outcome to TKA at short-term to midterm follow-up, however, with poor long-term survivorship.

Comparison of Posterior Cruciate-Retaining and High-Flexion Cruciate-Retaining Total Knee Arthroplasty Design

BACKGROUND

High-flexion prostheses have been developed to achieve deep flexion after total knee arthroplasty. The purpose of this study is to compare standard NexGen (CR, cruciate-retaining) and high-flexion NexGen (CR-flex) total knee prostheses in terms of range of motion, clinical and radiologic outcomes, rates of complications, and survivorship in long-term follow-up.

METHODS

From January 2000 to December 2008, 423 consecutive knees underwent total knee arthroplasty using standard CR or CR-flex prostheses. Fifty-three patients were lost to follow-up or declined to participate and 54 died, leaving 290 knees. The minimum duration of follow-up was 8 years (mean 10.1 years). Physical examination and knee scoring of patients were assessed preoperatively, at 6 months and 1 year after surgery, and annually thereafter. Supine anteroposterior and lateral radiographs and standing anteroposterior hip-to-ankle radiographs were obtained preoperatively and at each follow-up.

RESULTS

Mean postoperative range of motions in the standard CR group and the CR-flex group were similar, showing no significant difference between the 2 groups (P = .853). At the time of the final follow-up, mean total Hospital for Special Surgery scores were similar between the 2 groups (P = .118). Mean Knee Society pain (P = .325) and function scores (P = .659) were also comparable between the 2 groups. Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index score showed no intergroup difference either (P = .586). The mean hip-knee-ankle angle at the final follow-up was approximately the same (P = .940). Mean coronal angles of femoral and tibial component at final follow-up were also similar (P = .211 and P = .764, respectively). The prevalence of the radiolucent line was 0.6% in the standard CR group and 0.9% in the CR-flex group. Estimated survival rate according to Kaplan-Meier survival analysis was 97.2% in the standard CR group and 95.6% in the CR-flex group at mean follow-up of 10.1 years.

CONCLUSION

This study suggests that excellent clinical and radiographic outcomes could be achieved with both standard and high-flexion CR total knee designs. High-flexion CR prosthesis did not show any advantages over the standard design.

Two different posterior-stabilized mobile-bearing TKA designs: navigator evaluation of intraoperative kinematic differences

PURPOSE

The purpose of this study was to compare two types of posterior-stabilized (PS) mobile-bearing (MB) total knee arthroplasties (TKAs). The hypothesis was that no major differences were going to be found among the two TKA designs.

METHODS

Two cohorts of patients who were divided according to implant design (Cohort A, new design gradually reducing radius PS MB TKA; Cohort B, traditional dual-radius PS MB TKA) were analyzed by means of intraoperative navigation. All operations were guided by a non-image-based navigation system that recorded relative femoral and tibial positions in native and implanted knees during the following kinematic tests: passive range of motion (PROM), varus-valgus stress test at 0° and 30° (VV0, VV30) and anterior/posterior drawer test at 90° of flexion (AP90).

RESULTS

There were no significative differences in kinematic tests between the two implants. Cohort A, however, showed a different post-implant trend for VV0 and VV30 that were lower than the pre-implant ones, as expected, while for Cohort B, the trend is opposite. However, the gradually reducing radius prosthesis (Cohort A) showed a trend of improving stability (29% compared to the preoperative status) in mid-flexion (VV30) which the traditional dual-radius design (Cohort B) would not. Moreover, we found no differences among postoperative results of the two TKA designs.

CONCLUSION

Despite design variations, no difference has been found among the prostheses in terms of PROM, rotations and translations. Both design kinematics did not show paradoxical external rotations, but an increase in femoral translation in mid-flexion without affecting the functioning of the prosthesis.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

II.

Biomechanical role of posterior cruciate ligament in total knee arthroplasty: A finite element analysis

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE

The knee joint is a complex structure which is vulnerable to injury due to various types of loadings as a consequence of walking, running, stair climbing, etc. Total knee arthroplasty (TKA) is a widely used and successful orthopedic procedure which during that the posterior cruciate ligament (PCL) can either be retained or substituted. Different surgical techniques suggest retention or sacrifice of the PCL in TKA for the treatment of osteoarthritis which may alter the post-op outcomes. The objective of this study was to evaluate the biomechanical role of PCL after TKA surgery using finite element (FE) modeling.

METHODS

A three-dimensional (3D) FE model of the prosthetic knee was developed and its validity was compared to available studies in literature. Further, the effect of the retention or removing of the PCL as well as its degradation (i.e. variation in mechanical properties) and angle on knee biomechanics were evaluated during a weight-bearing squatting movement.

RESULTS

The validity of the intact model were confirmed. The results revealed higher stresses in the PCL and tibial insert at higher femoral flexion angles. In addition, the effect of variations in the stiffness of the PCL was found to be negligible at lower while considerable at higher femoral flexion angles. The variations in the elevation angle of the PCL from 89° to 83° at the critical femoral angles of 60° and 120° showed the highest von Mises stresses in the tibial insert.

CONCLUSIONS

The results have implications not only for understanding the stresses in the prosthetic knee model under squat movement but also for providing comprehensive information about the effects of variations in the PCL stiffness and balancing on the induced stresses of the PCL and tibial insert.