Corneal temperature reversal after storage in Chen medium compared with Optisol GS

Comparative Analysis of Endothelial Cell Density and Central Thickness of Corneas Used for Endothelial Keratoplasty Procedures Using Various Storage Solutions

PURPOSE

The goal of this study was to evaluate the effect of various Food and Drug Administration-approved storage solutions on endothelial cell density (ECD) and central corneal thickness (CCT).

METHOD

We analyzed 6220 tissues used for endothelial keratoplasty procedures between January 2022 and June 2023 that were stored in either Life4°C, Optisol-GS, Kerasave, or Eusol-C under hypothermic conditions. We analyzed preprocessing CCT, success rate of meeting surgeon's Descemet stripping automated endothelial keratoplasty (DSAEK) thickness preferences, and preprocessing and postprocessing ECD. Results were analyzed using one-way analysis of variance, followed by multiple pairwise comparisons using the Tukey test.

RESULTS

Mean preprocessing CCT was significantly lower in the Life4°C group (532 μm) than in Optisol-GS (549 μm), Kerasave (582 μm), and Eusol-C (589 μm) groups (all P < 0.0001). Preprocessing CCT in the Optisol-GS group was significantly lower than in Kerasave and Eusol-C groups (F (3, 3273) = 153.1, all P < 0.0001). Success rate of meeting surgeon DSAEK preferences was statistically similar among all 4 groups. Preprocessing ECD of the Kerasave group (2821 cells/mm 2 ) was numerically higher than of the Eusol-C (2791 cells/mm 2 ), Life4°C (2759 cells/mm 2 ), and Optisol-GS (2768 cells/mm 2 ) groups ( P = 0.3232, 0.0004, and 0.0015, respectively).

CONCLUSIONS

Corneal tissues stored in Kerasave and Eusol-C are significantly thicker than those in Life4°C and Optisol-GS. However, the success rate of meeting surgeon DSAEK preferences is similar among all 4 storage solutions.

A Comprehensive Review of Donor Corneal Preservation Strategies

ABSTRACT

Successful corneal transplantation relies on the viability of the corneal endothelium. Although various preservation systems have been developed in the field of eye banking, long-term storage of the corneal endothelium poses challenges and is costly. Optisol-GS in the past has been the most commonly used solution for intermediate-term corneal storage in the United States. However, disruptions in the availability of Optisol-GS, caused by rising costs and supply shortages, have necessitated alternative methods of corneal preservation. Previously described preservation methods include hypothermia (2-8°C) for short-term storage (7-14 days), organ culture (28-37°C) for intermediate storage (4-7 weeks), and cryopreservation for longer-term storage. In this review, we examine standard practice and alternative methods for corneal storage.

Cold Storage Media versus Optisol-GS in the Preservation of Corneal Quality for Keratoplasty: A Systematic Review

Optisol-GS is the most widely used pharmaceutical composition to preserve corneas for transplantation. This systematic review investigated the effects of different cold corneal storage media (CCSM) compared with Optisol-GS on the quality of stored corneas. The literature was searched throughout May 2022 on six databases and grey literature. Studies including corneas (population) exposed to distinct cold storage media (exposure) and Optisol-GS (comparison) that reported qualitative and/or quantitative parameters of cornea quality (outcome) were included. Methodological quality was assessed using ToxRTool. From 4520 identified studies, fourteen were included according to the eligibility criteria, comprising 769 evaluated cornea samples comparing Optisol-GS with commercial and noncommercial media. All studies showed good methodological quality. Experimental times ranged from 1–28 days, mainly using 4 °C as the preservation temperature. Viable endothelial cell density (ECD) and endothelial cell morphology (EC) were the most assessed parameters. ECD results for Cornisol were higher than Optisol-GS in 10 days (p = 0.049) and favored Cornea ColdTM up to 4 weeks (p < 0.05), which also showed better qualitative results. While the standardization of test protocols could improve comparisons, evidence indicates that most CCSM present similar performances on cornea preservation for transplantation at seven days, while some formulations may increase preservation at extended times.

Overview of Short-Term and Intermediate-Term Corneal Storage Solution: Comparison of Clinical Outcomes and Need For Future Research

ABSTRACT

Corneal donor tissue preservation techniques have incrementally improved since the introduction of McCarey-Kaufman storage solution from short-term storage to intermediate duration of storage with the advent of organ culture and Optisol GS storage solutions. Improved understanding of the corneal endothelial cell physiology has helped in designing newer storage solutions, such as the Life 4C and Cornea Cold. The incorporation of antibiotics, ATP precursors, minerals, and vitamins has improved the viability of tissues. In addition, these modifications to the newer storage solutions have increased the endothelial longevity and metabolic activity. Despite these advances, the duration of tissue storage has largely been restricted to 2 weeks in Optisol GS and 4 weeks in organ culture. The role and cost-effectiveness of antifungal supplementation and the need for improved epithelial preservation are additional areas that need to be explored. This review intends to summarize the efficacy and viability of donor corneas in different tissue storage solution and compare clinical outcomes while providing an insight into the challenges in developing newer methods of corneal preservation.

Cold chain monitoring during cold transportation of human corneas for transplantation

BACKGROUND

As recommended by international standards the cornea should be maintained in a specific temperature range (2 degrees -8 degrees C) to guarantee its viability. However, there is no standard packaging method to maintain these conditions during transport. Our packaging system is similar to those used by the main eye banks in Spain and elsewhere in Europe. The objective is to monitor the cold chain in the current packaging method to validate the maintenance of temperature within the adequate range for a minimum 24-hour period.

METHODS

The effects of the following variables were studied: number and freezing temperature of the cold packs; air volume in the packaging system; position of the cornea in the packaging system; and the wall section of the container. Exterior temperature was maintained constant at 20 degrees to 24 degrees C. The cold chain was monitored using a device that measures temperature continuously and for which a histogram of temperature variation can be downloaded to a computer for further analysis.

RESULTS

When the cold packs were frozen to -40 degrees C or the number of cold packs increased to four, the temperature decreased quickly to 0 degrees C and the transport period was not prolonged. The main objective was to improve isolation by reducing inner air volume, and maintaining the position of the cornea in the container.

CONCLUSIONS

The currently used cold packaging systems (not frozen, 4 degrees C) do not maintain the temperature within the accepted range for the required distribution period. The improved system maintains the cornea at between 2 degrees C and 6 degrees C for a minimum of 24 hours.