Intraocular lens implantation after penetrating keratoplasty

Corneal Pathology and Cataract: Combined Surgery or Sequential Surgery?

Objectives

To compare our combined surgery (CS) and sequential surgery (SS) results.

Materials and Methods

The files of 44 patients who underwent CS (penetrating keratoplasty [PK], cataract extraction, and intraocular lens [IOL] implantation) and 126 patients who underwent SS (cataract extraction and IOL implantation in a second session after PK) between January 2009 and December 2018 were evaluated retrospectively. One eye of the patients who were followed up for at least 1 year was included in the study. The two groups were compared in terms of indications, corrected distance visual acuity (CDVA), refractive results, complications, and graft survival.

Results

In the CS and SS groups, the median age was 63 (30-79) and 43 (18-73) years (p<0.001) and the median follow-up time was 51 (13-152) and 64.5 (13-154) months (p=0.011), respectively. The most common PK indications were traumatic corneal scar (20.5%) and endothelial dystrophy (15.9%) in the CS group versus keratoconus (24.6%) and stroma dystrophy (17.5%) in the SS group. In the CS and SS groups, 50% vs 69% of patients had CDVA ≥0.4 (p=0.04); 45.5% vs 25.4% had CDVA (0.1-0.3) (p=0.04); and 54.5% vs 73% had spherical equivalent ≤±2.0 D (p=0.02). The most common postoperative complications were glaucoma (20.5% vs 15.9%, p=0.48) and allograft reaction (9.1% vs 23%, p=0.04). Graft survival rates were 95.2% vs 86.5% (p=0.10) at 1 year and 75.9% vs 68.9% (p=0.47) at 5 years, respectively.

Conclusion

Over long-term follow-up, the groups were similar in terms of graft survival. For this reason, each patient must be evaluated separately whether to perform a combined or sequential surgery. Given the lower refractive error and higher expectation of final visual acuity, SS can be more advantageous especially in young patients.

Survival of the fittest: phacoemulsification outcomes in four corneal transplants by Dr Ramon Castroviejo

AIM

To evaluate and report the outcomes following phacoemulsification on four eyes, 45 years or more after corneal transplantation.

METHODS

A retrospective case series of four eyes in three patients (P1, P2, P3), undergoing phacoemulsification at least 45 years after corneal transplantation by Dr Ramon Castroviejo. Corneal graft survival outcome measures included central corneal thickness (CCT), best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA), corneal clarity and endothelial cell count (ECC).

RESULTS

Phacoemulsification was successfully completed in all four cases with no instances of graft failure during the postoperative follow-up period, which ranged from 17 months to 76 months. At the conclusion of the follow-up period, all four grafts remained clear, and BCVA remained better than or similar to preoperative values. Long-term follow-up revealed no meaningful changes in CCT after phacoemulsification. All but one case experienced a decrease in ECC, with ECC values in the four cases ranging from 538 cells/mm² to 1436 cells/mm² at the conclusion of postoperative follow-up.

CONCLUSION

Limited data have been published on the long-term survival of corneal grafts after intraocular surgery, especially for extremely 'mature' corneal transplants. This case series demonstrates that with appropriate preoperative, intraoperative and postoperative measures, successful phacoemulsification can be performed in these cases with excellent long-term results.

Evaluation of Phacoemulsification Cataract Surgery Outcomes After Penetrating Keratoplasty

BACKGROUND:

Cataract is one of the reasons which causes impaired visual acuity (VA) of the eyes after penetrating keratoplasy (PK), which can be treated by cataract surgery after PK or triple procedure. Cataract surgery after PK has advantages that parameters of the eyes such as axial length, anterior chamber depth (ACD) as well as corneal curvature are stabilized after removing all sutures postoperatively, and intraocular lens (IOL) power can be calculated correctly. Therefore, postoperative VA will be improved significantly. In Vietnam, there have not been any study about cataract surgery after PK, therefore we conduct this research.

AIM:

To evaluate the outcomes of phacoemulsification cataract surgery following primary PK.

METHODS:

Non-randomized controlled intervention study. Ninteen eyes (19 patients) that underwent phacoemulsification plus IOL insertion after initial PK in Cornea department, Vietnam National Institute of Ophthalmology, from December 2013 to September 2014.

RESULTS:

All patients presented with reduced VA, including 17 eyes (89.9%) with VA ≤ 20/200, mean astigmatism was 7.9 ± 1.0 D. Clear corneal grafts in 16 eyes while corneal opacity was seen in 3 eyes. All eyes with cataract were diagnosed from grade 2. After cataract surgery, improved VA > 20/200 was achieved in 72.22% of cases. There was a markable reduce of postoperative astigmatism with 1.8 ± 0.8 D (p < 0.05). However, the immunologic graft reaction was presented in one eye, and two edematous corneas also reported after cataract surgery. After treatment, there was one cornea achieved its clarity.

CONCLUSION:

Phacoemulsification cataract surgery following initial PK showed good outcomes with improved postoperative VA, reduced astigmatism, and the ultimate graft survival rate was high.

Secondary Intraocular Lens Implantation After Simultaneous Penetrating Keratoplasty and Cataract Extraction for Coexisting Corneal and Lens Opacities

PURPOSE

To report the results of a new approach to the 2-stage surgical management of coexisting visually significant corneal opacities and cataract.

METHODS

A retrospective analysis of eyes with corneal opacities and cataract that were surgically treated with simultaneous penetrating keratoplasty and cataract surgery, followed by secondary intraocular lens (IOL) implantation after removal of corneal sutures, was conducted. The parameters used for assessment were the following: mean percentage of graft endothelial cell loss after IOL implantation, deviation of the postoperative mean spherical equivalent from the target refraction, and mean uncorrected distance visual acuity (UDVA).

RESULTS

Twenty-nine eyes were included in the study. The mean baseline UDVA was 1.94 ± 0.46, and the mean baseline best-corrected distance visual acuity was 1.56 ± 0.42. The mean interval between the 2 surgical interventions was 13.3 ± 2.2 months. Just before secondary IOL implantation, the mean endothelial cell density was 2198 ± 311 cells. The mean percentage of corneal endothelial cell loss was 7.3% at 6 months after IOL implantation (P = 0.16). Before IOL implantation, the mean spherical equivalent was +11.75 ± 3.38 D. After IOL implantation, the mean spherical equivalent improved to -0.19 ± 0.93 D (P = 0.003) at 6 months. The mean UDVA improved to 0.34 ± 0.18 (P = 0.017), whereas the mean corrected distance visual acuity improved to 0.18 ± 0.29 at 6 months (P = 0.016). All grafted corneas maintained their clarity until the final follow-up visit.

CONCLUSIONS

Postponing IOL implantation some months after simultaneous penetrating keratoplasty and cataract extraction has a negligible effect on the corneal graft endothelium and achieves near postoperative target refraction with significant improvement in UDVA.

Comparison of the Techniques of Secondary Intraocular Lens Implantation after Penetrating Keratoplasty

Aim

To conduct a retrospective analysis of secondary IOL implantation in patients who underwent PK with no simultaneous IOL implantation.

Materials and Methods

The retrospective study of the secondary implantation of IOLs was conducted in 46 eyes that underwent a primary operation with PK and cataract/lens extraction with no IOL implantation due to capsule rupture or combining corneal or intraocular complications. The minimum period from PK was 12 months. All secondary IOL implantations were performed from January 2011 to August 2017. Aphakic postkeratoplasty patients were treated using one of the surgical techniques for secondary IOL implantation. In-the-bag IOL implantation was possible if the posterior capsule was complete. If the lens capsule remnants were sufficient to provide secure IOL support, an in-the-sulcus IOL implantation was performed. Scleral fixation was offered in eyes with extensive capsular deficiency or the presence of the vitreous body in anterior chamber. BCVA and expected and achieved refraction were evaluated; we included using two biometry devices, and results were compared.

Results

The corrected distance visual acuity (CDVA) before surgery ranged from 0.1 to 0.8 (mean 0.54 ± 0.17). After secondary IOL implantation, CDVA ranged from 0.2 to 0.8 (mean 0.43 ± 0.14) at postoperative 1 month and from 0.3 to 0.9 (mean 0.55 ± 0.15) at postoperative 6 months (p < 0.05). Comparison of the final refraction using two methods of biometry showed no statistically significant difference in the group that underwent scleral fixation of the IOL, similar to the findings for the in-the-bag and in-the-sulcus IOL implantation groups. In the scleral-fixation group, p=0.55 for the USG biometry technique and p=0.22 for the OB technique. p values for the IOL-implantation group were p=0.49 and p=0.44, respectively.

Conclusion

Both implantation methods are safe for the patients. Final refraction is depending on the technique and indication to keratoplasty. Both biometry techniques deliver precise data for IOL choice.

Cataract surgery after deep anterior lamellar keratoplasty and penetrating keratoplasty in age- and disease-matched eyes

PURPOSE

To assess the efficacy and safety of cataract surgery after deep anterior lamellar keratoplasty (DALK) and penetrating keratoplasty (PKP).

SETTING

Tokyo Dental College Ichikawa General Hospital, Chiba, Japan.

DESIGN

Retrospective case series.

METHODS

Age-matched and disease-matched eyes that had phacoemulsification and intraocular lens insertion after DALK or PKP were studied. Graft clarity was assessed at the final follow-up. The difference in the endothelial cell density (ECD), corrected distance visual acuity (CDVA), spherical equivalence, and refractive error between the expected values and values 1, 3, 6, and 12 months after cataract surgery were compared between the 2 groups.

RESULTS

Indications for keratoplasty were corneal stromal scar (22 eyes), lattice dystrophy (2 eyes), keratoconus (2 eyes), and postherpetic keratitis (4 eyes). All 30 eyes in each group had successful cataract surgery after keratoplasty. Graft clarity rates were 90.0% and 80.0% in the DALK group and PKP group, respectively (P = .47). The decrease in ECD at 12 months was significantly greater in the PKP group than in the DALK group (8.7% [SD] ± 21.7% versus 26.3% ± 27.8%) (P = .043). The CDVA was significantly improved in both groups. At 1 month, the mean refractive error was -0.5 diopter (D) ± 2.4 (SD) in the DALK and -0.4 ± 1.9 D in the PKP groups and remained stable thereafter.

CONCLUSIONS

Cataract surgery was successfully performed in eyes that had DALK or PKP, providing excellent visual and refractive outcomes. In cases of combined cataract and corneal pathology, and in the absence of endothelial involvement, DALK followed by cataract surgery might cause less endothelial damage.

Effects of Cataract Surgery on Endothelium in Transplanted Corneal Grafts: Comparison of Extracapsular Cataract Extraction and Phacoemulsification for Complicated Cataract after Penetrating Keratoplasty

Background:

The endothelium should be carefully evaluated when choosing a surgical technique for cataract removal. Therefore, we aimed to study the effects of different cataract surgery techniques on endothelial cell loss in transplanted corneal grafts.

Methods:

A total of 54 patients who received complicated cataract surgery in post-penetrating keratoplasty (PKP) eyes at the Shandong Eye Institute between February 2001 and June 2014 were included, and clinical records were reviewed. Baseline demographic details, clinical characteristics, endothelial cell density (ECD), and best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) were recorded. Wilcoxon rank-sum test and Wilcoxon signed-rank test were used to test the equality of medians. A regression model was constructed to compare the reduced rate of ECD.

Results:

Of the 54 eyes included in this study, extracapsular cataract extraction (ECCE) was performed in 34 eyes of 33 patients (ECCE group) whereas phacoemulsification was performed in 20 eyes of 20 patients (phacoemulsification group). There was no significant difference in the median age (P = 0.081) or preoperative ECD (P = 0.585) between the two groups. At 6 months after cataract surgery, ECD in ECCE group was significantly higher than that in phacoemulsification group (P = 0.043). In addition, the endothelial cell loss rate in ECCE group was significantly lower than that in phacoemulsification group at 2 months (P = 0.018), 4 months (P < 0.001), and 6 months (P < 0.001) after cataract surgery. Endothelial cell loss rate after cataract surgery increased over the 6-month study duration in both ECCE group (P < 0.001) and phacoemulsification group (P < 0.001), but phacoemulsification resulted in a greater reduction in ECD than that of ECCE in transplanted corneal grafts (P < 0.001). There was no significant difference in postoperative BCVA between the two groups (P = 0.065).

Conclusion:

ECCE is more suitable than phacoemulsification in cataract surgery in complicated cataract after PKP.

Phacoemulsification and customized toric intraocular lens implantation in eyes with cataract and high astigmatism after penetrating keratoplasty

Phacoemulsification and implantation of a hydrophilic acrylic toric intraocular lens (IOL) (T-flex 623T) with customized cylindrical power was performed in 1 eye in 3 consecutive patients with cataract and high postkeratoplasty astigmatism (range 6.75 to 8.75 diopters [D]). Twelve months postoperatively, the uncorrected distance visual acuity improved from 20/200 to 20/30 in Case 1, from 20/400 to 20/40 in Case 2, and from 20/200 to 20/25 in Case 3 and the corrected distance visual acuity was 20/25 or better in all 3 eyes. The spheroequivalent was within ± 0.50 D of the intended value and the refractive astigmatism was less than 1.00 D. The corneal grafts were transparent, and the endothelial cell loss range was 6% to 12%. Rotation of the toric IOL was less than 5 degrees. The toric IOL with customized cylindrical power provided good postoperative rotational stability and very satisfactory postoperative visual recovery. This type of toric IOL is appropriate to correct high postkeratoplasty astigmatism in eyes operated on for cataract.

FINANCIAL DISCLOSURE

No author has a financial or proprietary interest in any material or method mentioned.

Timing of suture removal in sequential surgery: a pilot study

PURPOSE

To study the appropriate timing of corneal suture removal in sequential surgery (penetrating keratoplasty [PK]-phacoemulsification [PE]) procedures.

METHODS

In a pilot study, patients with a PK double running suture in place requiring cataract surgery were randomized to suture removal 1 month before PE or during PE (n = 14; 7 in each group). Visual acuity, refraction, manual keratometry, Pentacam analysis, biomicroscopy, biometry, endothelial cell count, and funduscopy were determined before suture removal/PE and after PE (except biometry). Outcome measures at 6 months were corneal refractive change (induced by PE plus suture removal) analyzed by conversion to corneal power vector, index of surface variance change, and postoperative spherical equivalent, corrected, and uncorrected visual acuity.

RESULTS

Average corneal refractive change induced was 1.63, -2.98 x 96 degrees in the preoperative suture removal group and 2.14, -2.84 x 90 degrees in the intraoperative suture removal group. Difference in parameters of the corneal power vector change were statistically significant but not clinically relevant (M, spherical component, 0.14 vs 0.72, P = 0.01, respectively; J, astigmatic component, 1.49 vs 1.42, P = 0.01, respectively). Postoperative spherical equivalent, index of surface variance change, and corrected and uncorrected visual acuity were not significantly different in the two groups.

CONCLUSIONS

Differences in refractive state and visual acuity of the eye are not observed between patients with PK continuous suture removal (1 month) before PE and during PE.

Chandelier retroillumination-assisted torsional oscillation for cataract surgery in patients with severe corneal opacity

We describe a technique that uses 25-gauge transconjunctival chandelier endoillumination in combination with a torsional oscillation system for cataract surgery in cases with severe bullous keratopathy. Because of the hands-free and self-retaining nature of the chandelier fiber, continuous curvilinear capsulorhexis and subsequent bimanual intraocular manipulation can be performed easily. Torsional oscillation efficiently emulsifies lens particles along with the fluidics, preventing posterior capsule rupture and endothelial cell damage. After the chandelier fiber is removed at the end of surgery, the 25-gauge incision self-seals. This technique is safe and provides excellent visualization during cataract surgery in patients with severe corneal opacities.

Outcomes of combined penetrating keratoplasty and cataract extraction compared with penetrating keratoplasty alone

PURPOSE

To compare the rejection rates, graft failure rates, mean visual, keratometric and refractive outcomes of combined penetrating keratoplasty and cataract extraction with penetrating keratoplasty alone.

METHODS

A retrospective study of all patients who had combined keratoplasty and cataract extraction/intraocular lens insertion (49 eyes; mean age 65.3 years; mean follow up 17 months) compared with all patients who had keratoplasty only (58 eyes; mean age 64.0 years; mean follow up 14 months).

RESULTS

One hundred and seven eyes in 99 patients had keratoplasty in the period and were included in the study. The most common indication for keratoplasty in patients who had triple procedures was Fuchs' endothelial dystrophy (24.5%). During the study seven (6.5%) grafts failed and four (3.7%) had allogenic rejection without failure during this period. There was no statistical difference between the graft survival rates of the two study groups. The mean postoperative logMAR visual acuity (VA) was 0.42 and postoperative VA of 6/12 or better was seen in 71% of patients. Mean postoperative corneal curvature was 44.6 dioptres (D), mean corneal astigmatism was -4.0 D and was >or=5 D in 38%. Mean double-angle Cartesian coordinates for corneal astigmatism were x-0.87 D and y-0.29 D. Mean best sphere of postoperative refractions was -0.61 D and mean absolute refractive error was 2.2 D. There was no statistically significant difference in VA, keratometric or refractive outcome measures between the two study groups.

CONCLUSION

Over a short follow up, keratoplasty combined with cataract extraction/intraocular lens insertion showed a similar risk of graft failure or allogenic graft rejection when compared with keratoplasty alone and we recommend the triple procedure for quicker visual recovery and less operative procedures.

Refractive error after triple and non-simultaneous procedures: is the application of a standard constant keratometry value in IOL power calculation advisable?

PURPOSE

The purpose of this investigation was to determine whether or not the use of a standard constant keratometry value in cases of preoperative abnormal keratometry values in biometry for triple procedures is advisable.

METHODS

Cataract surgery and penetrating keratoplasty were performed in 82 eyes; 53 eyes underwent triple procedures and 29 eyes underwent non-simultaneous procedures. A standard constant keratometry value of 42.50 D was applied in 18 triple-procedure eyes because the preoperative measured keratometry values were outwith the normal range (41-47 D). The spherical equivalent and expected values were compared after a mean follow-up of 20.5 months.

RESULTS

Cases in the triple-procedure group that achieved spherical equivalent within +/- 2.0 D of expected values included nine of 18 eyes (50%) in which a standard constant keratometry value of 42.50 D was applied, three of 17 eyes (18%) in which keratometry values outwith the normal range were applied (p = 0.044), and eight of 18 eyes (45%) in which keratometry values within the normal range were applied (p = 0.862). Cases in the non-simultaneous procedure group that achieved spherical equivalent within +/- 2.0 D of expected values included 22 of 24 eyes (92%) in which keratometry values within the normal range were applied (p = 0.0025), and five of five eyes (100%) in which a standard constant keratometry value was applied.

CONCLUSIONS

The application of a standard constant keratometry value of 42.50 D for intraocular lens power calculation in triple procedures can be recommended if abnormal keratometry values were measured previously. If possible, non-simultaneous procedures should take priority.

Implantation of Verisyse Phakic Intraocular Lens to Correct Myopic Refractive Error After Penetrating Keratoplasty in Pseudophakic Eyes

PURPOSE

We report 2 cases in which a Verisyse phakic intraocular lens (PIOL) was used to successfully treat high myopia after penetrating keratoplasty (PK) in pseudophakic patients.

METHODS

Case 1 involved a 69-year-old pseudophakic man with a manifest refraction (MR) of -6.50 + 1.75 x 048 and a best spectacle corrected visual acuity (BSCVA) of 20/40 approximately 16 months after PK in the right eye. Case 2 was a 78-year-old pseudophakic man who had an MR of -9.00 + 5.75 x 132 with a BSCVA of 20/100 approximately 24 months after PK in the left eye.

RESULTS

In case 1, 10 months after Verisyse PIOL implantation, the MR was pl +2.00 x 135 with a BSCVA of 20/30. Endothelial cell density (ECD) in this patient decreased from 1926.1 to 815.3 cells/mm over 17 months. In case 2, 24 months after Verisyse PIOL implantation, the MR was -3.25 + 3.50 x 105 with a BSCVA of 20/60. ECD in this patient decreased from 2108.4 to 753.8 cells/mm in 30 months.

CONCLUSION

The Verisyse PIOL may provide an alternative method to correct high myopia for anisometropia in pseudophakic patients after PK. In this report, PIOL implantation was associated with a decrease in ECD. Further studies are required to determine the long-term effects and ultimate safety of PIOL placement on the integrity of the cornea endothelium after corneal transplant in pseudophakic patients.

Refractive surgery after corneal transplantation

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Many patients who have undergone corneal transplantation are unable to achieve satisfactory visual acuity with spectacle and contact lens correction alone. For these patients, refractive surgery becomes a viable option to reduce the post-keratoplasty ametropia. With the many recent advances in refractive surgery for naturally occurring refractive error, new possibilities arise for application to this complicated set of patients. This review discusses key recent developments in refractive surgery after corneal transplantation.

RECENT FINDINGS

The biomechanical effects of incisional keratotomy on post-keratoplasty corneas continue to be studied, and these techniques remain a common and simple method of reducing astigmatism. Photorefractive keratectomy, previously problematic for regression and haze formation, is gaining new prominence as early experience with the adjunctive use of mitomycin C has demonstrated good results. Long-term studies with laser in-situ keratomileusis (LASIK) have continued to show good safety and efficacy. Modern developments in cataract surgery appear to have lower incidences of graft rejection and failure. Developments in lens implantation technology continue to offer expanding options for intraocular refractive surgery.

SUMMARY

Although visual rehabilitation after corneal transplantation remains a formidable challenge, developments in refractive surgery for naturally occurring ametropias directly translate into an improved ability to help these most challenging refractive cases. Continued research will bring about improved efficacy while maintaining a high level of safety.

Hinterkammerlinsenimplantation nach perforierender Keratoplastik

BACKGROUND

Posterior chamber lens implantation (PCL) after penetrating keratoplasty (pKp) might contribute to late endothelial graft failure due to intraoperative damage of graft endothelium or due to PCL-associated facilitation of chronic endothelial cell loss.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

A total of 55 eyes were retrospectively selected. By means of exponential regression analysis, individual annual relative endothelial cell loss was calculated. Six patients were pseudophakic prior to pKp (group A). Due to advanced cataracts in 18 patients (group B) a combined operation (triple-procedure) had been initially performed. Of the remaining 31 eyes. 17 underwent PCL implantation after a mean of 1.5+/-1.2 years post pKp during follow-up (group C). The remaining 14 eyes remained phakic during follow-up (group D).

RESULTS

A statistically significant difference between the groups was not observed for the follow-up period or duration of culture ( p=0.14; Kruskal-Wallis-Test). Graft failures during follow-up were also not observed.

CONCLUSION

From these preliminary results, cataract surgery does not seem to promote late endothelial failure after pKp.

Cataract Extraction Following Penetrating Keratoplasty

OBJECTIVE

To assess the safety of cataract extraction following penetrating keratoplasty for corneal graft survival and to evaluate visual and refractive outcomes in corneal graft patients undergoing cataract extraction.

METHODS

Retrospective chart review of 29 eyes of 24 patients with corneal grafts who underwent cataract extraction from January 1, 1993 to December 31, 2002, followed on the Cornea Service at Wills Eye Hospital.

RESULTS

The mean time from penetrating keratoplasty to cataract extraction was 8.4 years (range 2 months to 36 years). Following cataract extraction, the corneal grafts remained clear in all but 1 eye (3%), during an average follow-up time of 44.5 months (range 3-118 months). All of the remaining patients benefited from improved visual acuity, with 15 of 28 patients having a postoperative best-corrected visual acuity of 20/30 or better. Patients also benefited from decreased absolute spherical refractive error, with a preoperative mean value of 6.6 +/- 3.4 D compared with 2.4 +/- 1.6 D postoperatively, while cylindrical refractive error remained relatively stable at 3.2 +/- 2.9 D preoperatively and 2.8 +/- 2.4 postoperatively. The patient who developed graft failure had 3 episodes of preoperative endothelial rejection and a clear corneal graft at the time of cataract surgery.

CONCLUSIONS

Cataract surgery following penetrating keratoplasty is a safe and effective procedure, with a low but definite risk of corneal graft failure. In patients with clear grafts and visually significant cataracts, cataract extraction alone is preferred over repeat penetrating keratoplasty and cataract extraction.