Effect of an air-fluidized bed on insensible water loss

Microclimate: A critical review in the context of pressure ulcer prevention

Pressure ulcers are caused by sustained mechanical loading and deformation of the skin and subcutaneous layers between internal stiff anatomical structures and external surfaces or devices. In addition, the skin microclimate (temperature, humidity and airflow next to the skin surface) is an indirect pressure ulcer risk factor. Temperature and humidity affect the structure and function of the skin increasing or lowering possible damage thresholds for the skin and underlying soft tissues. From a pressure ulcer prevention research perspective, the effects of humidity and temperature next to the skin surface are inextricably linked to concurrent soft tissue deformation. Direct clinical evidence supporting the association between microclimate and pressure ulceration is sparse and of high risk of bias. Currently, it is recommended to keep the skin dry and cool and/or to allow recovery periods between phases of occlusion. The stratum corneum must be prevented from becoming overhydrated or from drying out but exact ranges of an acceptable microclimate are unknown. Therefore, vague terms like 'microclimate management' should be avoided but product and microclimate characteristics should be explicitly stated to allow an informed decision making. Pressure ulcer prevention interventions like repositioning, the use of special support surfaces, cushions, and prophylactic dressings are effective only if they reduce sustained deformations in soft tissues. This mode of action outweighs possible undesirable microclimate properties. As long as uncertainty exists efforts must be taken to use as less occlusive materials as possible. There seems to be individual intrinsic characteristics making patients more vulnerable to microclimate effects.

Nutrients and Wound Healing: Still Searching for the Magic Bullet

Clinicians in nearly all practice areas are confronted with the challenges associated with delayed and impaired wound healing. Although nutrition plays a critical role in the healing process, controversy exists regarding the optimal nutrition regimen. This article reviews literature related to nutrition interventions that facilitate wound healing. The limitations of the research that forms the scientific basis of many nutrition recommendations are also examined. The limited availability of rigorously performed clinical studies to develop evidence-based guidelines for nutrition support in wound care emphasizes the need for further research and underscores the importance of individualizing the nutrition care plan for each patient.

Long-Term Enteral Nutrition Support and the Risk of Dehydration

Dehydration is a serious risk for the long-term tube-fed patient who is not allowed oral intake, has an altered mental status, is unable to communicate, is elderly or fluid-restricted, or has thirst impairment. The intent of this review is to provide a case-based discussion regarding the evaluation, treatment, and prevention of dehydration in these types of patients. Identification of risk factors, along with evaluation of subjective, objective, and laboratory parameters, provides the basis for clinical evaluation. "Hidden" sources of fluid intake such as the water content of solid foods and water generated from nutrient oxidation and "hidden" sources of fluid output such as evaporative losses should be considered in waterbalance calculations. The method for treatment and prevention of dehydration depends on the presence or absence of hypovolemia, type of body fluid losses, and whether the patient demonstrates hypernatremia, normonatremia, or hyponatremia.