Inspiratory work of breathing on flow-by and demand-flow continuous positive airway pressure

Health economic modeling of the potential cost saving effects of Neurally Adjusted Ventilator Assist

OBJECTIVES

Asynchrony between patient and ventilator breaths is associated with increased duration of mechanical ventilation (MV). Neurally Adjusted Ventilatory Assist (NAVA) controls MV through an esophageal reading of diaphragm electrical activity via a nasogastric tube mounted with electrode rings. NAVA has been shown to decrease asynchrony in comparison to pressure support ventilation (PSV). The objective of this study was to conduct a health economic evaluation of NAVA compared with PSV.

METHODS

We developed a model based on an indirect link between improved synchrony with NAVA versus PSV and fewer days spent on MV in synchronous patients. Unit costs for MV were obtained from the Swedish intensive care unit register, and used in the model along with NAVA-specific costs. The importance of each parameter (proportion of asynchronous patients, costs, and average MV duration) for the overall results was evaluated through sensitivity analyses.

RESULTS

Base case results showed that 21% of patients ventilated with NAVA were asynchronous versus 52% of patients receiving PSV. This equals an absolute difference of 31% and an average of 1.7 days less on MV and a total cost saving of US$7886 (including NAVA catheter costs). A breakeven analysis suggested that NAVA was cost effective compared with PSV given an absolute difference in the proportion of asynchronous patients greater than 2.5% (49.5% versus 52% asynchronous patients with NAVA and PSV, respectively). The base case results were stable to changes in parameters, such as difference in asynchrony, duration of ventilation and daily intensive care unit costs.

CONCLUSION

This study showed economically favorable results for NAVA versus PSV. Our results show that only a minor decrease in the proportion of asynchronous patients with NAVA is needed for investments to pay off and generate savings. Future studies need to confirm this result by directly relating improved synchrony to the number of days on MV.

The impact of spontaneous ventilation on distribution of lung aeration in patients with acute respiratory distress syndrome: airway pressure release ventilation versus pressure support ventilation

BACKGROUND

In this study, we sought to determine which mode, airway pressure release ventilation (APRV) or pressure support ventilation (PSV), decreases atelectasis more in patients with acute lung injury/acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS).

METHODS

This was a retrospective study in the intensive care unit. Between 2006 and 2007, we identified 18 patients with acute lung injury/ARDS who received either APRV or PSV and had a helical computed tomography scan twice in 3 days.

RESULTS

Computed tomography data from the APRV and PSV groups (n = 9 each) were analyzed for 3-dimensional reconstruction and volumetry. Aerated lung regions (normally aerated, poorly aerated, nonaerated, and hyperinflated) were identified by their densities in Hounsfield units. The Pao(2)/Fio(2) ratio and alveolar-arteriolar oxygen gradient after ventilation were improved in both groups (P = 0.008); however, the improvements in the APRV group exceeded those in the PSV group when delivered with equal mean airway pressure (P = 0.018 and 0.015, respectively). Atelectasis decreased significantly from 41% (range, 17%-68%) to 19% (range, 6%-40%) (P = 0.008) and normally aerated volume increased significantly from 29% (range, 13%-41%) to 43% (range, 25%-56%) (P = 0.008) in the APRV group, whereas lung volume did not change in the PSV group.

CONCLUSIONS

Spontaneous ventilation during APRV improves lung aeration by decreasing atelectasis. PSV for gas exchange is effective but not sufficient to improve lung aeration. These results indicate that APRV is more efficient than PSV as a mode of primary ventilatory support to decrease atelectasis in patients with ARDS.

Mechanical ventilation

Over the past several years, there has been an introduction of numerous modes of mechanical ventilation, each with their own advantages and limitations. This article reviews the common modes of mechanical ventilation, new technologies, and specific ventilator strategies that have been shown to be beneficial. In addition, it reviews the steps that should be taken when troubleshooting a ventilator.

Work of breathing characteristics of seven portable ventilators

Portable ventilators (PVs) are used for patient transport with increasingly frequency. Due to design differences it would not be unexpected to find differences among these ventilators in the imposed work of breathing (WOBI) during spontaneous respiratory efforts. The purpose of this investigation was to compare the WOBI characteristics during spontaneous breathing of seven PVs; Bird Avian, Bio-Med Crossvent 4, Pulmonetics LTV 1000, Hamilton Max, Drägerwerk Oxylog 2000, Impact Uni-Vent 750, and Impact Uni-Vent 754 using a model of spontaneous breathing. Differences between the PVs in regards to the measured parameters increased with increases in simulated breathing demand. WOBI, peak inspiratory pressure, and pressure-time product were consistently less with the LTV 1000 over the range of simulated breathing conditions. During pressure support ventilation these parameters were significantly less with the LTV 1000 compared with the Crossvent 4. Only the WOBI produced by the LTV was consistently lower than the physiologic work of breathing across the simulated spontaneous breathing conditions. Based on these results it is predicted PVs with flow triggering and positive end-expiratory pressure compensation will consistently offer the least WOBI. Clinicians should be aware of these characteristics when using PVs with spontaneous breathing patients.

Mechanical ventilation in chronic obstructive lung disease

Exacerbations of COPD are a leading indication for MV in the intensive care unit. A thorough understanding of the pathophysiology of AVF in COPD is critical for physicians caring for these patients. In particular, physicians should understand DHI and use the ventilator and ancillary techniques to minimize its impact. Noninvasive positive-pressure ventilation should be considered strongly in relatively stable patients with an adequate mental status and manageable secretions. Once AVF resolves, patients should be removed from the ventilator as soon as is safe to do so to minimize the adverse effects of prolonged MV. An organized approach to weaning and identifying patients capable of independent breathing is crucial. Most patients with COPD and AVF benefit from MV and generally return to or approach their premorbid functional status. A significant subset, however, will not benefit from, or choose not to undergo, MV. Deciding upon appropriate therapeutic options for these patients relies heavily on effective communication between physician and patient. Comprehensive discussions before the development of AVF can assist decision-making after respiratory failure develops.

Comparison of work of breathing between two neonatal ventilators utilizing a neonatal pig model

OBJECTIVE

The purpose of this study was to determine whether variations in the delivery systems of continuous positive airway pressure between two ventilators would lead to differences in patient work of breathing (WOBp).

DESIGN

Comparison of two neonatal ventilators with a neonatal pig model.

SETTING

Animal laboratory.

SUBJECTS

Thirty healthy, intubated, sedated, spontaneously breathing neonatal piglets weighing 1.0-2.0 kg.

INTERVENTIONS

Patient work of breathing (WOBp) (gm cm/kg) was measured by using measurements based on an esophageal balloon and a flow transducer. Each breath was analyzed for ventilator response times (in msecs) and negative deflection of pressure. Each animal was studied with the Siemens SV300 and Drager Babylog 8000, on continuous positive airway pressure settings of 0, 3, and 5 cm H2O. Data were analyzed by using Wilcoxon's Signed Rank Test with significance of p <or=.05.

MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS

Comparing ventilators, WOBp was on average 29% higher in the Babylog. Analysis of individual breaths showed that disparity in WOBp was probably related to the automatic availability of 2 cm H2O pressure support ventilation in the SV300. This may also explain the differences in delay time during the start of the inspiratory phase before initiation of gas flow. The mean duration of inspiratory effort was 394 (+/- 157) msecs in the Babylog and 138 (+/- 35) msecs in the SV300, a 174% increase in time delay for the Babylog (p =.005). During inspiratory effort, there was >1 cm H2O negative pressure before flow was available with the Babylog.

CONCLUSIONS

In intubated patients, maximum energy expenditure occurs at the initiation of ventilator breaths. WOBp in neonatal pigs was significantly increased. The response time of the ventilators may explain the differences in initiation of flow times and patient work. These differences may have important implications for energy kinetics, weight gain, and duration of mechanical ventilation in preterm neonates.

Autotriggering caused by cardiogenic oscillation during flow-triggered mechanical ventilation

OBJECTIVES

We noticed that in some patients after cardiac surgery, when flow triggering was used, cardiogenic oscillation might be autotriggering the ventilatory support. In a prospective study, we evaluated the degree of cardiogenic oscillation and the frequency rate of autotriggering. We suspected that autotriggering caused by cardiogenic oscillation was more common than clinically appreciated.

DESIGN

Prospective, nonrandomized, clinical study.

SETTING

Surgical intensive care unit in a national heart institute.

PATIENTS

A total of 104 adult patients were enrolled after cardiac surgery.

INTERVENTIONS

During the study period, patients were paralyzed and ventilated with intermittent mandatory ventilation at a rate of 10 breaths/min, pressure support of 10 cm H2O, and flow triggering with a sensitivity of 1 L/min.

MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS

Because the patients would not be able to breathe spontaneously, we counted pressure-support (PS) breaths as instances of autotriggering. Then, we classified the patients into two groups according to the number of PS breaths: an "AT group" (PS breaths of >5/min) and a "non-AT group" (PS breaths of < or =5/min). If autotriggering occurred, we decreased the sensitivity so autotriggering disappeared (threshold triggering sensitivity). The intensity of cardiogenic oscillation was assessed as the flow and airway pressure at the airway opening. A total of 23 patients (22%) demonstrated more than five autotriggered breaths/min. During mechanical ventilation, the inspiratory flow fluctuation caused by cardiogenic oscillation was significantly greater in the AT group than in the non-AT group (4.67+/-1.26 L/min vs. 2.03+/-0.86 L/min; p<.01). The AT group also showed larger cardiac output, higher ventricular filling pressures, larger heart size, and lower respiratory system resistance than the non-AT group. As the inspiratory flow fluctuation caused by cardiogenic oscillation increased, the level of triggering sensitivity also was increased to avoid autotriggering. In the AT group with 1 L/min of sensitivity, the respiratory rate increased (19.9+/-2.7 vs. 10+/-0 breaths/min, p<.01), Paco2 decreased (30.8+/-4.0 torr [4.11+/-0.36 kPa] vs. 37.6+/-4.3 torr [5.01+/-0.57 kPa]; p < .01), and mean esophageal pressure increased (7.7+/-3.0 vs. 6.9+/-3.0 cm H2O; p<.01) compared with the threshold triggering sensitivity.

CONCLUSIONS

Autotriggering caused by cardiogenic oscillation is common in postcardiac surgery patients when flow triggering is used. Autotriggering occurred more often in patients with more dynamic circulation. Autotriggering caused respiratory alkalosis and hyperinflation of the lungs.

Flow triggering added to pressure support ventilation improves comfort and reduces work of breathing in mechanically ventilated patients

PURPOSE

The purpose of this study was to measure the effect of flow triggering (FT), added to pressure support ventilation (PSV), during spontaneous breathing in intubated patients.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A prospective observational study was conducted at a Comprehensive Cancer Center, University Hospital. Fourteen consecutive critically ill, mechanically ventilated patients on PSV with positive end-expiratory pressure were studied. Flow triggering was added to PSV in spontaneously breathing ventilated patients.

RESULTS

Respiratory rate (f), minute ventilation (Vepsilon), patient work of breathing (WOBp), respiratory drive (P0.1), rapid shallow breathing index (f/Vt), tidal volume (Vt) and a visual analog scale of breathing effort and comfort all improved. There was a large decrease in WOBp and P0.1 when flow triggering was added to PSV (P<.001). There was a moderate decrease in f/V1 during the same procedure (P<.01). Twelve patients felt subjectively better with the intervention.

CONCLUSIONS

Flow triggering offers an excellent complement to PSV because it improves patient comfort and reduces the magnitude of the inspiratory effort as well as the delay time between inspiratory muscle contraction and gas flow. It augments gas exchange at no metabolic cost to the patient while reducing the work of breathing.

Work of breathing, inspiratory flow response, and expiratory resistance during continuous positive airway pressure with the ventilators EVITA-2, EVITA-4 and SV 300

OBJECTIVE

To analyze work of breathing (WOB) imposed by the respirators EVITA-2, EVITA-4 (Drägerwerk, Lübeck, Germany) and SV 300 (Siemens-Elema, Sweden) as well as inspiratory flow response and expiratory flow resistance during continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP).

DESIGN

Five study conditions on a lung model (CPAP at 0, 5, and 10 mbar, CPAP 5 mbar plus pressure support 2 mbar with both EVITA models, and CPAP 5 mbar with decreasing levels of flow and pressure trigger sensitivity with the SV 300) and three randomized study conditions in nine patients recovering from open heart surgery (condition A: EVITA-2, CPAP 5 mbar; condition B: SV 300, CPAP 5 mbar, flow trigger; condition C: SV 300, pressure trigger-4 mbar).

SETTING

University hospital intensive care unit and laboratory of pulmonary physiology.

MEASUREMENTS AND RESULTS

At each study condition we measured WOB, pressure-time product (PTP), WOB and PTP imposed (WOBimposed and PTPimposed), tidal volume, minute ventilation, respiratory rate, inspiratory trigger time, trigger pressure, trigger PTP, duration of inspiration, mean and peak inspiratory flow, and the delay from the onset of inspiration to peak inspiratory flow. Since the SV 300 automatically generates an additional pressure support of 2 cm H2O PTP, WOB, WOBimposed, and PTPimposed were higher with the EVITA-2 and EVITA-4 regardless of the trigger sensitivity set on the SV 300. The difference was neutralized with both types of EVITA ventilator by adding 2 mbar of pressure support during CPAP in order to achieve comparable conditions. Inspiratory flow response was faster with both EVITA models, expiratory flow resistance was higher with the SV 300. Decrements of trigger sensitivity with the SV 300 accelerated the flow response.

CONCLUSIONS

Under similar conditions, no difference in WOBimposed was observed, although inspiratory flow response and expiratory flow resistance differed substantially between the three ventilators tested. Trigger sensitivity plays a minor role in determining PTP and WOB but has major influence on flow.

Effects of flow triggering on breathing effort during partial ventilatory support

The effects of flow triggering (FT) as compared with pressure triggering (PT) on breathing effort have been the focus of several studies, and discrepant results have been reported. In the initial part of our study, a lung model was used to quantify triggering effort (airway pressure-time product, PTPaw) for a range of sensitivity settings in nine new-generation ventilators. A ventilator providing both FT and PT was then used to compare these systems during pressure-support (PSV) and volume-targeted assist-control ventilation (ACV) in eight ventilator-dependent patients, using sensitivity settings (2 L/min for FT and -2 cm H2O for PT) that had proven significantly different in the initial bench study. Indexes of effort included the esophageal and transdiaphragmatic pressure-time products and inspiratory work of breathing per minute (PTPes/min, PTPdi/min, and Wi/min, respectively). The experimental study revealed significant differences between ventilators in PTPaw at commonly used settings. In two of three ventilators featuring both systems, PTPaw was significantly lower with FT than PT (p < 0.001). In the clinical study, FT as compared with PT, was associated with reductions in all indexes of breathing effort during PSV: 16 +/- 6% (p < 0.001), 13 +/- 10% (p < 0.01), and 14 +/- 12% (p < 0.05) for PTPdi/min, PTPes/min, and Wi/min, respectively. By contrast, no differences were found when FT was used during ACV. Although FT reduced triggering effort in both modes (p < 0.001), the effects observed during the post-trigger phase differed, and explained the discrepant results between the two modes. We conclude that FT more effectively reduces breathing effort when used in conjunction with a pressure-targeted mode than with a volume-targeted mode, especially when flow delivery is close to or below demand.

Ventilator-CPAP with the Siemens Servo 900C compared with continuous flow-CPAP in intubated patients: effect on work of breathing

The effects of continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) provided by the Siemens Servo 900C ventilator were compared with a continuous flow system (CF-CPAP) in patients weaning from the ventilator. Thirteen patients were studied using both systems at a CPAP level of 0.5 kPa. Additional work of breathing (Wapp) and derived variables were determined in relation to the minute volumes of the patients. The Wapp imposed by the ventilator exceeded the Wapp of CF-CPAP in all patients. The difference in Wapp between ventilator- and CF-CPAP was greater at higher ventilatory needs. The increments in Wapp imposed by the ventilator were positively correlated with the actual end-expiratory pressures (EEP). The EEP increasingly exceeded the preset CPAP level of the ventilator at higher minute volumes. An inspiratory threshold due to a gradient between EEP and preset CPAP greatly increased the Wapp imposed by the ventilator. As this threshold was attributed to the resistance of the PEEP device of the ventilator, it indicates that the additional work related to the expiratory value should be taken into account when the Siemens Servo 900C ventilator is used for weaning purposes.

Pressure vs flow triggering during pressure support ventilation

BACKGROUND

Adult mechanical ventilators have traditionally been pressure- or time-triggered. More recently, flow triggering has become available and some adult ventilators allow the choice between pressure or flow triggering. Prior studies have supported the superiority of flow triggering during continuous positive airway pressure, but few have compared pressure and flow triggering during pressure support ventilation (PSV). The purpose of this study was to compare pressure and flow triggering during PSV in adult mechanically ventilated patients.

METHODS

The study population consisted of 10 adult patients ventilated with a mechanical ventilator (Nellcor-Puritan-Bennett 7200ae) in the PSV mode. In random order, we compared pressure triggering of -0.5 H2O, pressure triggering -1 cm H2O, flow triggering of 5/2 L/min, and flow triggering 10/3 L/min. Pressure was measured for 5 min at the proximal endotracheal tube using a data acquisition rate of 100 Hz. From the airway pressure signal, trigger pressure (deltaP) was defined as the difference between positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP) and the maximum negative deflection prior to onset of the triggered breath. Pressure-time product (PTP) was defined as the area produced by the pressure waveform below PEEP during onset of the triggered breath. Trigger time (deltaT) was defined as the time interval below PEEP during onset of the triggered breath.

RESULTS

A pressure trigger of -0.5 cm H2O was significantly more sensitive than the other trigger methods for deltaP, PTP, and deltaT (p<0.001). There was also a significant difference between patients for deltaP, deltaT, and PTP for each trigger method (p<0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

For this group of patients, flow triggering was not superior to pressure triggering at -0.5 cm H2O during PSV.

Comparison of pressure- and flow-triggered pressure-support ventilation on weaning parameters in patients recovering from acute respiratory failure

OBJECTIVE

To compare the effects of pressure- and flow-triggered pressure-support ventilation on weaning parameters during recovery from acute respiratory failure.

DESIGN

Prospective, randomized, clinical trial.

SETTING

Intensive care unit in a university hospital.

PATIENTS

Sixteen orotracheally intubated adult patients recovering from acute respiratory failure of various etiologies, without chronic obstructive pulmonary disease.

INTERVENTIONS

Randomized application of pressure- and flow-triggered pressure-support ventilation at 100% and 75% ventilatory support levels in each triggering system. A total of four conditions were applied for 30 mins each in all patients.

MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS

Ventilatory, respiratory, and hemodynamic data were measured. For the measurement of weaning parameters, pressure and volume signals were directed to a computerized respiratory monitor by means of an esophageal probe and a flow sensor between the "Y" piece of the ventilatory circuit and the endotracheal tube. During both pressure-triggered (trigger sensitivity of -1 cm H2O) and flow-triggered (trigger sensitivity of 0.7 to 2.0 L/min) pressure-support ventilation with a ventilator, peak airway pressures were applied so as to decrease the work of breathing performed by the patient to zero (full ventilatory support). Partial ventilatory support was applied at 75% of the peak airway pressures achieved during full ventilatory support with each triggering system. A total of four experimental conditions were evaluated at identical FiO2 and positive and-expiratory pressure levels during pressure-support ventilation in each patient. Total ventilation volumes, arterial blood gas data, and hemodynamics did not differ among the four experimental conditions. During partial ventilatory support, the work of breathing, rapid shallow breathing index, and esophageal pressure increased significantly with both triggering systems when compared with data obtained at full ventilatory support. The mean data for the weaning parameters during the condition of partial ventilatory support were comparable between pressure- and flow-triggered pressure-support ventilation (i.e., 0.38 +/- 0.24 vs. 0.42 +/- 0.26 joule/L for work of breathing, 2.6 +/- 1.6 vs. 3.3 +/- 1.7 cm H2O for tracheal occlusion pressure, and 40.2 +/- 12.9 vs. 50.4 +/- 18.3 breaths/min/L for rapid shallow breathing index, respectively).

CONCLUSIONS

The application of either a pressure- or flow-triggered system during pressure-support ventilation with the ventilator did not significantly affect short-term changes in gas exchange, respiratory mechanics, and inspiratory workload in patients recovering from acute respiratory failure of various etiologies without chronic obstructive pulmonary disease.

Physiological effects of flow and pressure triggering during non-invasive mechanical ventilation in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease

BACKGROUND

The effect of the type of trigger system on inspiratory effort has been studied in intubated patients, but no data are available in non-invasive mechanical ventilation where the "trigger variable" may be even more important since assisted modes of ventilation are often employed from the beginning of mechanical ventilation.

METHODS

The effect of flow triggering (1 and 5 1/min) and pressure triggering (-1 cm H2O) on inspiratory effort during pressure support ventilation (PSV) and assisted controlled mode (A/C) delivered non-invasively with a full face mask were compared in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) recovering from an acute exacerbation. The patients were studied during randomised 15 minute runs at zero positive end expiratory pressure (ZEEP). The oesophageal pressure time product (PTPoes), dynamic intrinsic PEEP (PEEPi,dyn), fall in maximal airway pressure (delta Paw) during inspiration, and ventilatory variables were measured.

RESULTS

Minute ventilation, respiratory pattern, dynamic lung compliance and resistances, and changes in end expiratory lung volume (delta EELV) were the same with the two triggering systems. The total PTPoes and its pre-triggering phase (PTP due to PEEPi and PTP due to valve opening) were significantly higher during both PSV and A/C with pressure triggering than with flow triggering at both levels of sensitivity. delta Paw was larger during pressure triggering, and PEEPi,dyn was significantly reduced during flow triggering in the A/C mode only.

CONCLUSIONS

In patients with COPD flow triggering reduces the inspiratory effort during both PSV and A/C modes compared with pressure triggering. These findings are likely to be due to a reduction in PEEPi,dyn and in the time of valve opening with a flow trigger.

Comparison of total resistive work of breathing in two generations of ventilators in an animal model

Spontaneous breathing through an endotracheal tube and ventilator circuit is associated with an increased work of breathing (WOB). Recently, pediatric ventilators have introduced improved features to optimize patient-ventilator interactions. We performed an experiment utilizing an animal model to compare total resistive WOB of two widely used ventilators, the Siemens Servo Ventilator 300 (SV300) with patient-optimized features, such as flow-triggering and rapid response time, and the Siemens 900C (S900C) without those features. A total of 120 experiments of 10 minutes duration each were performed in 6 anesthetized, intubated lambs. In each experiment, the animal was randomized to either pressure support ventilation (PSV) of 5 cm H2O, or continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) with 0 cmH2O end expiratory pressure (ZEEP) while supported by the SV300 or the S900C. Each animal was used as its own control. WOB was measured with a Bicore monitoring device as WOB of the animal (WOBp), WOB of the ventilator (WOBv), and the pressure time product (PTP) for each breath during the experiment. Oxygen consumption (Vo2) of the animal was measured using breath-by-breath gas analysis with a customized metabolic monitoring system. A Wilcoxon signed rank sum test was used for analysis. All comparisons between the ventilators for both CPAP and PSV showed a statistically significant difference (p < 0.001). WOBp was reduced by 47% during pressure support ventilation (PSV) and by 47% during CPAP when the SV300 was used compared to the S900C. We conclude that WOB is significantly lower in animals ventilated with the SV300 than with the S900C ventilator, and we speculate that ventilators with the features of the SV300 may offer advantages in ventilating pediatric patients.

Effects of different triggering systems and external PEEP on trigger capability of the ventilator

OBJECTIVE

The triggering capability of both the pressure and flow triggering systems of the Servo 300 ventilator (Siemens-Elema, Sweden) was compared at various levels of positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP), airway resistance (R(aw)), inspiratory effort and air leak, using a mechanical lung model.

DESIGN

The ventilator was connected to a two bellows-in-series-type lung model with various mechanical properties. Lung compliance and chest wall compliance were 0.03 and 0.121/cmH2O, respectively. R(aw) was 5, 20 and 50 cmH2O/l/s. Respiratory rate was 15 breaths/min. To compare the triggering capability of both systems, the sensitivity of pressure and flow triggered pressure support ventilation (PSV) was adjusted to be equal by observing the triggering time at 0 cmH2O PEEP and 16 cmH2O of pressure support (PS) with no air leak. No auto-PEEP was developed. In the measurement of trigger delay, the PS level ranged from 16 to 22 cmH2O to attain a set tidal volume (V(T)) of 470 ml at a R(aw) of 5, 20 and 50 cmH2O/l/s. The PEEP level was then changed from 0, 5 and 10 cmH2O at a PS level of 17 cmH2O and R(aw) of 5 and 20 cmH2O/l/s, and the trigger delay was determined. The effect of various levels of air leak and inspiratory effort on triggering capability was also evaluated. Inspiratory effort during triggering delay was estimated by measurements of pressure differentials of airway pressure (Paw) and driving pressure in the diaphragm bellows (Pdriv) in both systems.

MEASUREMENTS AND RESULTS

There were no significant differences in trigger delay between the two triggering systems at the various PEEP and R(aw) levels. At the matched sensitivity level, air leak decreased trigger delay in both systems, and additional PEEP caused auto-cycling. A low inspiratory drive increased trigger delay in the pressure sensing system, while trigger delay was not affected in the flow sensing system. The Paw and Pdriv differentials were lower in flow triggering than in pressure triggering.

CONCLUSIONS

With respect to triggering delay, the triggering capabilities of the pressure and flow sensing systems were comparable with and without PEEP and/or high airway resistance at the same sensitivity level, unless low inspiratory drive and air leak were present. In terms of pressure differentials, the flow triggering system may require less inspiratory effort to trigger the ventilator than that of the pressure triggering system with a comparable triggering time. However, this difference may be extremely small.

Inspiratory effort and measurement of dynamic intrinsic PEEP in COPD patients: effects of ventilator triggering systems

OBJECTIVE

To investigate effects of ventilator triggering systems (pressure and flow triggering: PT and FT) on measurement of dynamic intrinsic PEEP (PEEPidyn) and patient-ventilator interaction in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease during weaning from mechanical ventilation.

DESIGN

Prospective study.

SETTING

Medical/surgical intensive care unit of an academic hospital.

PATIENTS AND PARTICIPANTS

6 COPD patients with acute respiratory failure ready to wean.

MEASUREMENTS

We measured flow, airway opening, esophageal and gastric pressures. Minute ventilation, breathing pattern and pressure time product (PTP) of the respiratory muscles and of the diaphragm were obtained during spontaneous ventilation through a mechanical ventilator (Puritan-Bennett 7200ae). Two triggering systems, namely PT and FT, were evaluated.

RESULTS

The inspiratory muscles effort necessary to overcome the triggering system overestimated PEEPidyn measurement of an amount equal to 49 +/- 2 and 58 +/- 3% during respectively pressure and flow triggering. FT increased tidal volume and minute ventilation and decrease PTP/b and PTP/min of the respiratory muscles and diaphragm.

CONCLUSIONS

To correctly measure PEEPidyn, the inspiratory effort produced to overcome PEEPi and to trigger the ventilator must be discriminated. Application of flow triggering requires less effort to initiate inspiration and provide a positive end-expiratory pressure level that is able to unload the respiratory muscles by reducing PEEPi. With flow triggering higher minute ventilation are obtained in COPD patients during the weaning phase.

Effect of low-level PEEP on inspiratory work of breathing in intubated patients, both with healthy lungs and with COPD

OBJECTIVE

Evaluation of low-level PEEP (5 cm H2O) and the two different CPAP trigger modes in the Bennett 7200a ventilator (demand-valve and flow-by trigger modes) on inspiratory work of breathing (Wi) during the weaning phase.

DESIGN

Prospective controlled study.

SETTING

The intensive care unit of a university hospital.

PATIENTS

Six intubated patients with normal lung function (NL), ventilated because of non-pulmonary trauma or post-operative stay in the ICU, and six patients recovering from acute respiratory failure due to exacerbation of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), breathing either FB-CPAP or DV-CPAP with the Bennett 7200a ventilator.

INTERVENTIONS

The patients studied were breathing with zero end-expiratory pressure (ZEEP), as well as CPAP of 5 cm H2O (PEEP), with the following respiratory modes: the demand-valve trigger mode, pressure support of 5 cm H2O, and the flow-by trigger mode (base flow of 20 l/min and flow trigger of 2 l/min). Furthermore, Wi during T-piece breathing was evaluated.

MEASUREMENTS AND RESULTS

Wi was determined using a modified Campbell's diagram. Total inspiratory work (Wi), work against flow-resistive resistance (W(ires)), work against elastic resistance (Wiel), work imposed by the ventilator system (W(imp)), dynamic intrinsic positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEPidyn), airway pressure decrease during beginning inspiration (P(aw)) and spirometric parameters were measured. In the NL group, only minor, clinically irrelevant changes in the measured variables were detected. In the COPD group, in contrast, PEEP reduced Wi and its components W(ires) and Wiel significantly compared to the corresponding ZEEP settings. This was due mainly to a significant decrease in PEEPidyn when external PEEP was applied. Flow-by imposed less Wi on the COPD patients during PEEP than did demand-valve CPAP. Differences in W(imp) between the flow-by and demand-valve trigger models were significant for both groups. However, in relation to Wi these differences were small.

CONCLUSION

We conclude that the application of low-level external PEEP benefits COPD patients because it reduces inspiratory work, mainly by lowering the inspiratory threshold represented by PEEPidyn. Differences between the trigger modes of the ventilator used in this study were small and can be compensated for by the application of a small amount of pressure support.

Breathing frequency and pattern are poor predictors of work of breathing in patients receiving pressure support ventilation

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the relationships between directly measured work of breathing (WOB) and variables of the breathing pattern commonly used at the bedside to infer WOB for intubated, spontaneously breathing patients treated with pressure support ventilation (PSV).

DESIGN

In vivo measurements of the WOB were obtained on a consecutive series of adults. Breathing frequency (f), tidal volume (VT), the index of rapid, shallow breathing (f/V T), the duration of respiratory muscle contraction expressed as the ratio of inspiratory time over total respiratory cycle time (TI/TTOT), and a breathing pattern score (applied to approximately 50% of the patients) which ranks f, VT, sternocleidomastoid muscle activity, substernal retraction, and abdominal paradox on a scale were variables of the breathing pattern were also measured. The greater the breathing pattern score, the lower the WOB and vice versa.

SETTING

Surgical ICUs in two university teaching hospitals.

PATIENTS

Sixty-seven adults (42 men and 25 women, aged 20 to 78 years) who had acute respiratory failure from various etiologies were studied. All patients were breathing spontaneously receiving continuous positive airway pressure and PSV.

INTERVENTIONS

Intraesophageal pressure (indirect measurement of intrapleural pressure) was measured with an esophageal balloon integrated into a nasogastric tube. VT was obtained by positioning a flow sensor between the "Y" piece of breathing circuit and the endotracheal tube. Data from these measurements were directed to a bedside respiratory monitor (Bicore; Allied Healthcare Products; Riverside, Calif) that calculates WOB using the Campbell diagram. Patients received PSV at levels deemed reasonable to unload the respiratory muscles. All measurements were obtained after 15 to 20 min at each level of PSV, averaged over 1 min, and then variables of the breathing pattern were regressed with directly measured values for WOB.

RESULTS

All breathing pattern variables poorly predicted WOB as evidenced by the low values for the coefficients of determination (r2). Breathing frequency correlated positively with WOB (r = 0.47, p < 0.001) and predicted or explained only 22% (r2 = .22) of the variance in WOB. VT correlated negatively and f/VT and TI/TTOT each correlated positively with WOB. However, these variables predicted only 20 to 27% of the variance in WOB. The breathing pattern score correlated negatively with WOB and predicted only 43% of the variance in WOB. A prediction model taking all variables into consideration using multiple regression analysis predicted only 50% of the variance in WOB; thus, it too was a poor to moderate predictor of WOB.

CONCLUSION

Our data reveal that WOB should be measured directly because variables of the breathing pattern commonly used at the bedside appear to be inaccurate and misleading inferences of the WOB. The clinical implication of these findings involves the traditional and empirical practice of titrating PSV based on the breathing pattern. We do not imply that the patient's breathing pattern should be ignored, nor undermine its importance, for it provides useful diagnostic information. It appears, however, that relying primarily on the breathing pattern alone does not provide enough information to accurately assess the respiratory muscle workload. Using the breathing pattern as the primary guideline for selecting a level of PSV may result in inappropriate respiratory muscle workloads. A more comprehensive strategy is to employ WOB measurements and the breathing pattern in a complementary manner when titrating PSV in critically ill patients.

Flow-triggering reduces inspiratory effort during weaning from mechanical ventilation

OBJECTIVE

To investigate whether a new flow-triggered (FT) system can reduce the patient's inspiratory effort compared to a traditional pressure-triggered (PT) system during weaning from mechanical ventilation.

DESIGN

Prospective study.

SETTING

Intensive care unit of a General Hospital.

PATIENTS AND PARTICIPANTS

10 mechanically ventilated patients, without chronic airway disease, ready to wean.

MEASUREMENTS

Minute ventilation, breathing pattern, lung mechanics, inspiratory work of breathing (WI) and pressure time product (PTP) of Ppl were obtained in two conditions: 1) unsupported spontaneous breathing through the ventilator circuit (SB); 2) spontaneous breathing with continuous positive airway pressure set at 5 cmH2O (CPAP). Two triggering systems, namely PT and FT, were used in each condition.

RESULTS

Though there was no change in breathing pattern, minute ventilation, and lung mechanics, the magnitude of the inspiratory effort decreased significantly with FT compared to PT in both instances. The added resistance (total flow resistance minus pulmonary resistance) decreased by 37% on average when FT replaced PT. PTP decreased, on average, 27% and 15% during SB and CPAP, respectively, with FT compared to PT (p < 0.05). A similar significant decrease was observed in WI.

CONCLUSION

The new FT system, i.e. flow-by system, reduces the unintentional ventilatory workload upon the patients' inspiratory muscles compared to traditional PT system during weaning from mechanical ventilation.

A comparative evaluation of pressure-triggering and flow-triggering in pressure support ventilation (PSV) for neonates using an animal model

The triggering system in pressure support ventilation needs to respond rapidly, especially in neonates. The aim of this study was to compare the effects of flow-triggered and pressure-triggered pressure support ventilation on neonatal mechanical ventilation using an animal model. Respiratory flow, airway pressure, oesophageal pressure, and diaphragmatic electromyogram were measured during pressure support ventilation in five anaesthetized rabbits. The animals were connected to a VIPBIRD (Bird, U.S.A.) (CPAP mode, pressure support ventilation, 5 cm H2O and PEEP 0 cm H2O). Flow-triggering sensitivity was set at 0.2l/min, 0.5l/min, 1.01l/min, or 1.5l/min. Pressure-triggering sensitivity was set at -1.0 cm H2O. Shorter trigger delay and longer pressure support time were observed in flow-triggering. There was also less diaphragmatic activity in flow-triggering as evidenced by the amplitude of integrated diaphragmatic electromyogram and negative deflection of oesophageal pressure. The findings suggest that flow-triggering will prove superior to pressure-triggering in pressure support ventilation for neonates.

Characteristics of the ventilator pressure- and flow-trigger variables

Pressure- and flow-triggering are available in the Puritan Bennett 7200ae and Siemens SV 300. Using a mechanical lung model, we described the characteristics of the pressure- and flow-triggered continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) of both ventilators. In the Puritan Bennett 7200ae, the pressure-triggered CPAP is characterized by the relatively insufficient flow delivery after the triggering, resulting in a greater lung pressure-time product (total PTP) than the flow-triggered CPAP. Pressure support of 5 cmH2O results in total PTP less than that with flow-triggered CPAP. In the Siemens SV 300, total PTP with pressure- or flow-triggered CPAP is comparable. Total PTP is less with pressure- or flow-triggered CPAP of the Siemens SV 300 than that of the Puritan Bennett 7200ae, respectively. The application of small pressure- or flow-triggered pressure support in the Puritan Bennett 7200ae eliminates the difference. The impact of these differences on patient inspiratory muscle work remains to be determined.

Comparison of pressure and flow triggering systems during continuous positive airway pressure

STUDY OBJECTIVE

Compare the inspiratory work of breathing (WOBI) during pressure triggering (PT), and flow triggering (FT) using two microprocessor ventilators.

DESIGN

A randomized, crossover comparison of triggering strategies and ventilators used.

SETTING

Surgical intensive care unit.

PATIENTS

Ten patients recovering from acute respiratory failure (eight men, two women; mean age, 48 +/- 12 years) breathing on continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) of 5 cm H2O were studied.

INTERVENTIONS

Patients were randomly assigned to either receive 5 cm H2O CPAP via one of two units (Hamilton Veolar or Puritan Bennett 7200ae) using either PT or FT. Each patient had 30-min trials using the following: (1) Veolar FT; (2) Veolar PT; (3) 7200ae FT; and (4) 7200ae FT.

MEASUREMENTS AND RESULTS

During each trial period, work of breathing (WOB) and pressure time product (PTP) were measured using a respiratory monitor (Bi-core CP-100). All patients were placed in semi-Fowler position and esophageal balloons were inserted and their position confirmed using the occlusion technique. Continuous measurements of peak negative pressure during inspiration, tidal volume (VT), minute ventilation (VE), respiratory frequency (f) were accomplished with a flow transducer at the proximal airway. FT with the 7200ae was superior to PT as measured by both the WOB (0.58 +/- 0.3 vs 0.84 +/- 0.2 J/L, p < 0.01) and PTP (148 +/- 50 vs 206 +/- 41 cm H2O/s/min, p, 0.05). FT with the Veolar was also superior to PT with respect to the WOB (0.53 +/- 0.2 vs 0.93 +/- 0.2 J/L, p < 0.01) and PTP (140 +/- 39 vs 229 +/- 46 cm H2O/s/min, p < 0.05).

CONCLUSION

FT reduces the WOB compared with PT, regardless of the ventilator used. The reduction in WOB during FT is related to improved responsiveness and changes in the posttrigger phase.

Estimation of triggering work of breathing. The dependence on lung mechanics and bias flow during pressure support ventilation

Work of breathing necessary to trigger a ventilator (WOBtr) was calculated during pressure support ventilation (PSV), and the effect of bias flow on WOBtr was evaluated. A spring-loaded bellows type lung model with two bellows placed in series was used to simulate spontaneous breathing. A Venturi mechanism of jet flow generated subatmospheric pressure inside the diaphragm bellows simulated inspiratory effort. The lung compliance (CL) was set at 0.3 L/cm H2O or 0.05 L/cm H2O. The airway resistance (Raw) was set at 5, 20, or 50 cm H2O/L/s. Pressure support levels were increased from 0 to 45 cm H2O. Sensitivity was set at 2 cm H2O. No bias flow was used at first. The WOBtr was calculated using a pressure-volume (P-V) loop derived from the diaphragm bellows movement during the triggering period. We determined WOBtr and its dependence on the various pressure support (PS) levels, CL and Raw. To evaluate the effects of bias flow on WOBtr and triggering delay, a ventilator was put in the PSV mode, with various bias flow rates (from 0 to 20 L/min) at a sensitivity of 2 cm H2O. We found that when no bias flow was used, WOBtr increased with an increase in both Raw and end-expiratory lung bellows pressure which was considered as auto-PEEP. With bias flow, both triggering delay and WOBtr increased. An increase in bias flow at a given PS level resulted in both decreased pressure support time and tidal volume (VT). It is concluded that the bias flow system is not desirable for use during PSV.

Pressure support ventilation via face mask in acute respiratory failure in hypercapnic COPD patients

OBJECTIVE

To test whether non-invasive ventilation via facial mask could reduce the need for tracheal intubation when mechanical ventilation must be initiated in COPD patients.

DESIGN

Open prospective interventional study.

SETTING

General Intensive Care Service of a County Hospital.

PATIENTS

We have studied 12 COPD patients during 14 episodes of acute exacerbation of chronic respiratory failure who failed to improve with intensive medical therapy and showed impairments in severe respiratory acidosis and/or hypercapnic encephalopathy leading their attending physicians to order mechanical ventilation.

INTERVENTIONS

In these circumstances, a trial of pressure-support (PS) ventilation (Servo Ventilator 900C) via facial mask Vital Signs Inc.) was performed. The level of pressure support was adjusted to obtain a tidal volume > 400 ml. If the patient deteriorated, tracheal intubation and standard mechanical ventilation were performed.

MEASUREMENTS AND RESULTS

Measurements are presented as means +/- SEM. A pressure-support level of 14 +/- 3 cmH2O was used during a period of 8 +/- 4 h. Low levels of external PEEP were used in 4 patients, while it generated excessive leaks in the others. Significant differences (p < 0.05 ANOVA for repeated measures) in data obtained on admission, when patients deteriorated and after pressure support was administered were only observed in PaCO2 (68 +/- 3 versus 92 +/- 3 versus 67 +/- 3 mmHg), arterial pH (7.27 +/- 0.03 versus 7.19 +/- 0.02 versus 7.31 +/- 0.01). SaO2 (60 +/- 4 versus 86 +/- 3 versus 92 +/- 1%) and respiratory rate (35 +/- 2 versus 32 +/- 2 versus 23 +/- 1 breaths.min-1). Three patients needed intubation and one of them died in the ICU.

CONCLUSION

Non-invasive ventilation (pressure-support) via face mask may reduce the need for tracheal intubation in the severe hypercapnic failure of COPD patients.

Inspiratory muscle work of breathing during flow-by, demand-flow, and continuous-flow systems in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease

The effect of flow-by continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) in comparison with continuous-flow (CF) CPAP on inspiratory muscle work of breathing (WI) in intubated patients is not known. We hypothesized that WI during flow-by CPAP would be comparable with that during CF CPAP. In nine intubated male patients recovering from acute respiratory failure related to chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, we compared the effects of flow-by, demand-flow, and CF CPAP on WI. We also evaluated the extent to which the addition of 5 cm H2O of pressure support to demand-flow CPAP (DF-PS5) decreases WI. At CPAP levels of zero and 8 cm H2O, flow-by, demand-flow, DF-PS5 were applied in random order followed by CF CPAP for 15 min each. WI (expressed as Joules per liter and Joules per minute), maximal airway pressure drop during inspiration (delta Paw), total lung resistance (RL), lung compliance (CL), and ventilatory variables were measured. At CPAP of zero cm H2O, WI with flow-by was comparable with CF CPAP, and significantly less than with demand-flow CPAP. At both CPAP of zero and 8 cm H2O, the addition of 5 cm H2O PS to demand-flow CPAP reduced WI significantly to a level comparable with that of flow-by CPAP. At both CPAP levels, delta Paw was the largest, with demand-flow CPAP. RL and CL were not significantly different between the different CPAP systems. We conclude that WI with flow-by CPAP is comparable with that with CF CPAP, and significantly less than with demand-flow CPAP.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Inspiratory work imposed by continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) machines: the effect of CPAP level and endotracheal tube size

Inspiratory work imposed by Continuous Positive Airway Pressure (CPAP) machines has been a matter of concern. The imposed inspiratory work of CPAP machine circuits (Wcir) and the effect of the total breathing apparatus with endotracheal tube (ETT) and connector included in the circuit (Wapp), were measured in three continuous flow (CF) and various configurations of three demand flow (DF) CPAP machines. The performance was assessed at 0, 5, 10 and 15 cmH2O CPAP using a Michigan Instruments Test Lung Model 1600, internal compliance set at 50 ml/cmH2O, driven at square wave inspiratory flows (VI) of 20, 40 and 60 l/min at a tidal volume of 500 ml. Work, expressed in mJ/l, was calculated from the area of pressure-volume loops. Inspiratory work, Wcir and Wapp, was dependent upon the particular CPAP machine, VI and ETT size, but not upon CPAP level, being maximum at VI 601/min and with ETT 7.0 mm i.d. Work values (Wcir) varied from 50 to 325 mJ/l with both CF and DF machines and up to 1100 mJ/l with ETT and connector (Wapp). No consistent advantage of CF over DF machines was demonstrated. There was little advantage of high gas flows (greater than 5 l/min) in various DF circuits. Within an individual machine maximum negative pressures generated during inspiration correlated with both Wcir and Wapp.

Pressure-time product during continuous positive airway pressure, pressure support ventilation, and T-piece during weaning from mechanical ventilation

The objective of this study was to compare the effects of continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP), pressure support ventilation (PS), and T-piece on the pressure-time product (PTP) during weaning from mechanical ventilation. The PTP is an estimate of the metabolic work or oxygen consumption of the respiratory muscles. We studied 10 intubated patients recovering from acute respiratory failure of various etiologies. A modified continuous flow (flow-by) CPAP of 0 and 5 cm H2O (CPAP-0 and CPAP-5, respectively), PS of 5 cm H2O (PS-5), and T-piece were applied in random order for 30 min each. In the last 5 min of the 30-min periods, we measured the esophageal pressure and transdiaphragmatic pressure-time products--PTP(es) and PTP(di), cm H2O.s/min, respectively-multiplied by respiratory frequency. Breathing pattern, total lung resistance (RL), quasi-static lung compliance (CL), intrinsic positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEPi), end-expiratory transpulmonary pressure (Ptpexp), arterial blood gases, blood pressure, and heart rate were also measured. In comparison to T-piece, CPAP-5 decreased PTP(es) 40% (p less than 0.01) and PTP(di) 43% (p less than 0.02), whereas PS-5 decreased PTP(es) 34% (p less than 0.01) and PTP(di) 38% (p less than 0.05). The decrease in PTP(es) with CPAP-5 was associated with a significant reduction in RL, and to a less extent in PEEPi relative to airway pressure. The contribution of the decrease in PEEPi to the reduction in PTP(es) amounted to 36%. With PS-5, respiratory system mechanics and PEEPi were not significantly different compared with T-piece. With CPAP-0, PTP tended to be lower than with T-piece.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)