Isotonic nasogastric tube feedings: do they cause diarrhea?

Antidiarrheal Efficacy of Probiotic Bacteria in Castor Oil Induced Diarrheal Mice

Probiotics may offer a safe intervention for diarrheal diseases. The aim of the present study was the assessment of the antidiarrheal property of probiotic bacteria. For their antidiarrheal efficacy assessment, yogurt was prepared using the isolated bacteria from selective regional yogurt of Bangladesh, and mice model trails were conducted using castor oil induced diarrheal mice. The probiotic treatment was applied on three mice groups, each having 6 mice and their respective doses were 50 mL/kg body weight in treatment group (TG) 1, 100 mL/kg body weight in TG2, and 150 mL/kg body weight in TG3. A four week treatment of probiotic significantly (P<0.001) reduced the percentage (67.37%) of diarrhea in TG3 (150 mL yogurt/kg body weight). All the treatment groups showed a significant (P<0.001) increase in the latent periods, reduced the total fecal output, and frequency and fecal water content compared to the negative control group. Serum electrolytes (Na⁺ and K⁺) and total protein levels were higher in the TG3 compared to the negative control group. Further research regarding molecular characterization and identification of specific genes and proteins of interest may help to develop the next generation bacteriocins and antidiarrheal drugs.

Role of Enteral Nutrition in Advanced Cancer Patients: Indications and Contraindications of the Different Techniques Employed

Over the last 20 years there has been great progress regarding total parenteral nutrition and enteral nutrition for patients who cannot take food by mouth or cannot swallow, or so that controlled feeding can be established in anorexic and malnourished patients. The use and the role of artificial nutrition is still controversial in advanced cancer patients. Such controversies often are due to the fact that these patients have a survival expectancy that varies from one to several months. The present review describes the most frequent techniques used for enteral nutrition (nasoenteral tubes, gastrostomy and jejunostomy), their indications, contraindications and complications, and gives an indication regarding which patients may really benefit from enteral nutrition taking into consideration not only the potential advantages but also the discomfort and distress related to enteral nutrition and the different techniques that are employed.

Formula delivery in patients receiving enteral tube feeding on general hospital wards: the impact of nasogastric extubation and diarrhea

OBJECTIVE

In contrast to the intensive care unit, little is known of the percentage of formula delivered to patients receiving enteral tube feeding (ETF) on general wards or of the complications that affect its delivery. This study prospectively investigated the incidence of nasogastric extubation and diarrhea in patients starting ETF on general wards and examined their effect on formula delivery.

METHODS

In a prospective observational study, the volume of formula delivered to patients receiving ETF on general wards was compared with the volume prescribed. The incidence of nasogastric extubation and diarrhea was measured and its effect on formula delivery calculated.

RESULTS

Twenty-eight patients were monitored for a total of 319 patient days. The mean +/- SD volume of formula prescribed was 1460 +/- 213 mL/d, whereas the mean volume delivered was only 1280 +/- 418 mL/d (P < 0.001), representing a mean percentage delivery of 88 +/- 25% of prescribed formula. Nasogastric extubation occurred in 17 of 28 patients (60%), affecting 53 of the 319 patient days (17%). The percentage of formula delivered on days when the nasogastric tube remained in situ was 96 +/- 12% and on days when nasogastric extubation occurred it was only 45 +/- 31% (P < 0.001). Diarrhea affected 39 of 319 patient days (12%) but there was no difference in formula delivery on days when diarrhea did or did not occur (78% versus 89%, P = 0.295). There was a significant, albeit small, negative correlation between the daily stool score and formula delivery (correlation coefficient -0.216, P < 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

Formula delivery is marginally suboptimal in patients receiving ETF on general wards. Nasogastric extubation is common and results in an inherent cessation of ETF until the nasogastric tube is replaced and is therefore a major factor impeding formula delivery. Diarrhea is also common but does not result in significant reductions in formula delivery.

Enteral feeding: the effect on faecal output, the faecal microflora and SCFA concentrations

Enteral tube feeding is common in both the hospital and community environment; however, patients can suffer alterations in faecal output that can have serious clinical sequelae. Problems associated with accurate characterisation of faecal output and definition of diarrhoea impede the comparison of research studies and prevent standardised assessment of therapeutic interventions in clinical practice. The colonic microflora may protect the patient against diarrhoea by preventing enteropathogenic infection and by producing SCFA that stimulate colonic water absorption. However, studies in healthy volunteers suggest that the composition of the enteral formula may have a negative impact on the microflora and SCFA concentrations. The addition of fructo-oligosaccharides to the enteral formula may partially prevent negative alterations to the microflora, although conclusive data from studies in patients are not yet available. Modification of the microflora with probiotics and prebiotics may hold potential in prophylaxis against diarrhoea during enteral tube feeding.

Intravenous albumin and nutrition support: going for the quick fix

BACKGROUND

IV albumin has been advocated as adjunctive therapy for hypoalbuminemic patients who are receiving nutrition support. This discussion will critically consider the rationale for this recommendation as well as the evidence available in the medical literature.

METHODS

The medical literature was reviewed.

RESULTS

Randomized controlled trials have shown that IV albumin improves serum albumin levels. However such therapy does not improve clinical outcome in patients receiving parenteral nutrition. Although no trials exist that test the hypothesis in hypoalbuminemic patients receiving enteral nutrition, the purported "supportive evidence" in the medical literature is actually weak and contradictory. IV albumin does have some associated toxicity, and it is expensive.

CONCLUSIONS

There is reason to believe that IV albumin is not effective in improving the clinical outcome of hypoalbuminemic patients who are receiving nutrition support. Until more compelling data become available, it is not reasonable to adopt a policy of routinely correcting the hypoalbuminemia in this way. In fact, hypoalbuminemia may be a manifestation of a serious disease state rather than a marker of deficient protein stores.

Experience with enteral nutrition in a hospital population of acutely ill patients

Enteral feeding has unique metabolic and immune advantages. This article describes the successful use of enteral nutrition, alone or in combination with parenteral feeding, in a tertiary-care hospital. Study participants were 89 patients who received enteral feeding during a 6-month period. These critically ill patients (ranging in age from 55 to 71 years) had severity of illness levels of 7 to 25 according to the Acute Physiologic and Chronic Health Evaluation (APACHE II) system and lengths of hospital stay from 27 to 73 days. Mortality was as high as 50% in patients with liver disease (nonmalignant), 35% in patients with cardiothoracic and vascular diseases, and 17% in patients with cancer and other diseases. Despite the severity of illness, patients met their energy and protein intake goals through enteral or combined feeding with total parenteral nutrition. Serial weights (ie, obtained weekly) and serum albumin concentrations did not improve during hospitalization. Complications related to enteral feeding were minimal (< 17% incidence). Differences were noted between survivors and nonsurvivors: nonsurvivors had lower serum albumin concentrations at the time of admission, had longer hospitalizations, and required total parenteral nutrition for more days than the survivors. Nonetheless, even with extremely sick patients, provision of enteral nutrition can be successful using the administration techniques we describe. Enteral nutrition could best be provided by beginning at a slow rate (10 c3/hour), inserting the feeding tube past the pylorus, and feeding according to sensible energy goals (25 kcal/kg of body weight), and using elemental then polymeric formulas.

Is there a role for albumin administration in nutrition support?

OBJECTIVE

To review the administration of exogenous albumin in patients receiving nutritional support and determine if the use of albumin is supported by controlled trials.

DATA SOURCES

MEDLINE search of English-language literature using the key terms albumin, parenteral nutrition, and enteral nutrition. The references of articles identified were also searched.

STUDY SELECTION

Studies examining the administration of exogenous albumin to hypoalbuminemic patients receiving nutrition support.

DATA EXTRACTION

Results from prospective randomized trials are presented in detail. Data from noncontrolled and animal studies are presented in areas where human controlled trials are limited.

DATA SYNTHESIS

Albumin is a marker of malnutrition and numerous studies have demonstrated that a low serum albumin concentration is associated with increased morbidity and mortality. Investigators have attempted to improve outcome through the administration of exogenous albumin. The results of controlled trials examining exogenous albumin administration have been equivocal. One study demonstrated a significant decrease in overall complications, pneumonia, and sepsis. In two other controlled trials, albumin administration failed to decrease complications. None of the studies demonstrated a significant decrease in mortality or length of stay. A low serum albumin concentration has also been linked to intolerance to enteral feedings. Although case reports and one study support the administration of albumin, two prospective controlled trials have failed to demonstrate improved tolerance to enteral feeding in hypoalbuminemic patients receiving exogenous albumin.

CONCLUSIONS

Evidence to date is insufficient to support the routine administration of exogenous albumin to hypoalbuminemic patients receiving nutrition support.

Enteral feeding, gastric colonisation and diarrhoea in the critically ill patient: is there a relationship?

In this prospective study we aimed to determine whether there is any relationship between enteral feeding, gastric colonisation and diarrhoea in the critically ill patient. Sixty-two critically ill patients from an intensive care unit of a major teaching hospital, who satisfied the usual criteria for enteral feeding, were randomised to receive enteral feeding or not for three days followed by a second randomisation to enterally feed or not for three days. Diarrhoea was recorded and cultures taken of both gastric aspirates and stool. There was no significant difference in the incidence of diarrhoea between the groups. Gastric colonisation was unrelated to feeding practice and to the development of diarrhoea. We conclude that in the critically ill patient, enteral feeding does not cause or promote diarrhoea.