Vasoactive drugs and splanchnic perfusion in septic shock

Update on Vasopressors and Inotropes in Septic Shock

Vasopressors and inotropes are used in septic shock in patients who remain hypotensive despite adequate fluid resuscitation. The goal is to increase blood pressure to optimize perfusion to organs. Generally, goal-directed therapy to supra-normal oxygen transport variables cannot be recommended due to lack of benefit. Traditionally, vasopressors and inotropes in septic shock have been started in a step-wise fashion starting with dopamine. Recent data suggest that there may be true differences among vasopressors and inotropes on local tissue perfusion as measured by regional hemodynamic and oxygen transport. When started early in septic shock, norepinephrine decreases mortality, optimizes hemodynamic variables, and improves systemic and regional (eg, renal, gastric mucosal, splanchnic) perfusion. Epinephrine causes a greater increase in cardiac index (CI) and oxygen delivery (DO2 ) and increases gastric mucosal flow, but increases lactic acid and may not adequately preserve splanchnic circulation owing to its predominant vasoconstrictive alpha (α ) effects. Epinephrine may be particularly useful when used earlier in the course of septic shock in young patients and those who do not have any known cardiac abnormalities. Unlike epinephrine, dopamine does not preferentially increase the proportion of CI that preferentially goes to the splanchnic circulation. Dopamine is further limited because it cannot increase CI by more than 35% and is accompanied by tachycardia or tachydysrhythmias. Dopamine, as opposed to norepinephrine, may worsen splanchnic oxygen consumption (VO2 ) and oxygen extraction ratio (O2 ER). Low-dose dopamine has not been shown to consistently increase the glomerular filtration rate or prevent renal failure, and, indeed, worsens splanchnic tissue oxygen use. Routine use of concurrently administered dopamine with vasopressors is not recommended. Phenylephrine should be used when a pure vasoconstrictor is desired in patients who may not require or do not tolerate the beta (β ) effects of dopamine or norepinephrine with or without dobutamine. Patients with high filling pressure and hypotension may benefit from the combination of phenylephrine and dobutamine. Investigational approaches to vasopressor-refractory hypotension in septic shock include the use of vasopressin and corticosteroids.

The role of vasoactive agents in the resuscitation of microvascular perfusion and tissue oxygenation in critically ill patients

Purpose

The clinical use of vasoactive drugs is not only intended to improve systemic hemodynamic variables, but ultimately to attenuate derangements in organ perfusion and oxygenation during shock. This review aims (1) to discuss basic physiology with respect to manipulating vascular tone and its effect on the microcirculation, and (2) to provide an overview of available clinical data on the relation between vasoactive drugs and organ perfusion, with specific attention paid to recent developments that have enabled direct in vivo observation of the microcirculation and concepts that have originated from it.

Methods

A MedLine search was conducted for clinical articles in the English language over the last 15 years pertainig to shock, sepsis, organ failure, or critically ill patients in combination with vasoactive drugs and specific variables of organ perfusion/oxygenation (e.g., tonometry, indocyanine clearance, laser Doppler, and sidestream dark field imaging).

Results

Eighty original papers evaluating the specific relationship between organ perfusion/oxygenation and the use of vasoactive drugs were identified and are discussed in light of physiological theory of vasomotor tone.

Conclusions

Solid clinical data in support of the idea that increasing blood pressure in shock improves microcirculatory perfusion/oxygenation seem to be lacking, and such a concept might not be in line with physiological theory of microcirculation as a low-pressure vascular compartment. In septic shock no beneficial effect on microcirculatory perfusion above a mean arterial pressure of 65 mmHg has been reported, but a wide range in inter-individual effect seems to exist. Whether improvement of microcirculatory perfusion is associated with better patient outcome remains to be elucidated.