The Beltone 5b artificial mastoid: theoretical characteristics and performance measurements

Feasibility of direct promontory stimulation by bone conduction: A preliminary study of frequency-response characteristics in cats

BACKGROUND

As an alternative pathway to air conduction, bone conduction is a multipathway process that transmits sound energy to the inner ear through the skull in general. Based on this mechanism, bone conduction devices (BCDs) have been used widely in the rehabilitation of hearing loss. Although great efforts have been devoted to improving BCDs, drawbacks still exist in most categories of BCDs due to the complicated process of bone conduction. We hypothesized that if a bone conduction transducer was placed on the cochlea to stimulate it directly, the attenuation would be minimized, and the frequency dependency would be different from that of the vibratory response induced by traditional BCDs. This study aimed to explore the feasibility of direct promontory stimulation and to investigate its frequency-response characteristics.

METHODS

Measurements were conducted in twelve cat ears. To stimulate the promontory directly, the floating mass transducer (FMT) of the Vibrant Soundbridge^© (VSB) implant was glued to the promontory coupled with an oval window (OW) coupler. Auditory brainstem response (ABR) and laser Doppler vibrometry (LDV) measurements were used to evaluate the auditory response induced by the FMT. In both measurements, the FMT was driven by direct voltage stimuli.

RESULTS

ABR waves could be induced under direct promontory stimulation by the FMT. In the frequency range of 1-12 kHz, the variation in the voltage threshold level were limited to 16 dB SPL with a maximum of 0.2 V at 1 kHz and a minimum of 0.04 V at 10 kHz. In the LDV measurements and the relative motion of the round window membrane (RWM) and the promontory were used to evaluate the cochlear response. The LDV results indicated a weak frequency dependency from 1 to 12 kHz.

CONCLUSION

Different from traditional stimulation via transcranial bone conduction, direct promontory stimulation is a new method in which a small bone conduction transducer stimulates the cochlear shell directly. The current experimental data demonstrate that it is feasible to generate sensations through bone conduction by stimulating the cochlea directly. Furthermore, the cochlear response induced by this type of stimulus in cats was weakly frequency dependent at frequencies ranging from 1 to 12 kHz. This study may provide a basis for the design of new transducers that can perform well over a wide range of frequencies.

High frequency bone conduction auditory evoked potentials in the guinea pig: Assessing cochlear injury after ossicular chain manipulation

Permanent high frequency (>4 kHz) sensorineural hearing loss following middle ear surgery occurs in up to 25% of patients. The aetiology of this loss is poorly understood and may involve transmission of supra-physiological forces down the ossicular chain to the cochlea. Investigating the mechanisms of this injury using animal models is challenging, as evaluating cochlear function with evoked potentials is confounded when ossicular manipulation disrupts the normal air conduction (AC) pathway. Bone conduction (BC) using clinical bone vibrators in small animals is limited by poor transducer output at high frequencies sensitive to trauma. The objectives of the present study were firstly to evaluate a novel high frequency bone conduction transducer with evoked auditory potentials in a guinea pig model, and secondly to use this model to investigate the impact of middle ear surgical manipulation on cochlear function. We modified a magnetostrictive device as a high frequency BC transducer and evaluated its performance by comparison with a calibrated AC transducer at frequencies up to 32 kHz using the auditory brainstem response (ABR), compound action potential (CAP) and summating potential (SP). To mimic a middle ear traumatising stimulus, a rotating bur was brought in to contact with the incudomalleal complex and the effect on evoked cochlear potentials was observed. BC-evoked potentials followed the same input-output function pattern as AC potentials for all ABR frequencies. Deterioration in CAP and SP thresholds was observed after ossicular manipulation. It is possible to use high frequency BC to evoke responses from the injury sensitive basal region of the cochlea and so not rely on AC with the potential confounder of conductive hearing loss. Ongoing research explores how these findings evolve over time, and ways in which injury may be reduced and the cochlea protected during middle ear surgery.

Systematic review of animal models of middle ear surgery

Animal models of middle ear surgery help us to explore disease processes and intervention outcomes in a manner not possible in patients. This review begins with an overview of animal models of middle ear surgery which outlines the advantages and limitations of such models. Procedures of interest include myringoplasty/tympanoplasty, mastoidectomy, ossiculoplasty, stapedectomy, and active middle ear implants. The most important issue is how well the model reflects the human response to surgery. Primates are most similar to humans with respect to anatomy; however, such studies are uncommon now due to expense and ethical issues. Conversely, small animals are easily obtained and housed, but experimental findings may not accurately represent what happens in humans. We then present a systematic review of animal models of middle ear surgery. Particular attention is paid to any distinctive anatomical features of the middle ear, the method of accessing the middle ear and the chosen outcomes. These outcomes are classified as either physiological in live animals, (e.g., behavioural or electrophysiological responses), or anatomical in cadaveric animals, (e.g., light or electron microscopy). Evoked physiological measures are limited by the disruption of the evoking air-conducted sound across the manipulated middle ear. The eleven identified species suitable as animal models are mouse, rat, gerbil, chinchilla, guinea pig, rabbit, cat, dog, sheep, pig and primate. Advantages and disadvantages of each species as a middle ear surgical model are outlined, and a suggested framework to aid in choosing a particular model is presented.