Forehead versus mastoid threshold differences with a circular tipped vibrator

Analysis of cross-talk cancellation of bilateral bone conduction stimulation

When presenting a stereo sound through bilateral stimulation by two bone conduction transducers (BTs), part of the sound at the left side leaks to the right side, and vice versa. The sound transmitted to the contralateral cochlea becomes cross-talk, which can affect space perception. The negative effects of the cross-talk can be mitigated by a cross-talk cancellation system (CCS). Here, a CCS is designed from individual bone conduction (BC) transfer functions using a fast deconvolution algorithm. The BC response functions (BCRFs) from the stimulation positions to the cochleae were obtained by measurements of BC evoked otoacoustic emissions (OAEs) of 10 participants. The BCRFs of the 10 participants showed that the interaural isolation was low. In 5 of the participants, a cross-talk cancellation experiment was carried out based on the individualized BCRFs. Simulations showed that the CCS gave a channel separation (CS) of more than 50 dB in the 1-3 kHz range with appropriately chosen parameter values. Moreover, a localization test showed that the BC localization accuracy improved using the CCS where a 2-4.5 kHz narrowband noise gave better localization performance than a broadband 0.4-10 kHz noise. The results indicate that using a CCS with bilateral BC stimulation can improve interaural separation and thereby improve spatial hearing by bilateral BC.

Boothless audiometry: Ambient noise considerations

Ambient noise in the test environment will impact signal detection during hearing threshold measurements due to psychoacoustic masking effects. Technical standards specify the maximum permissible ambient noise levels (MPANLs) for use during audiometric testing. MPANLs are dependent on several factors, including transducer characteristics (supra-aural, circumaural, type of ear cushions or earphone enclosures, and insert earphones), the nature of the hearing test being performed (air conduction vs bone conduction and threshold test vs screen at a suprathreshold level), and measurement instrumentation. The nature of the ambient noise (spectrum and constant vs variable) at the test site must be determined and continually accounted for during the boothless hearing test procedure. Ambient noise monitoring procedures are reviewed and examples of ambient noise characteristics in real-world settings, where hearing testing might be performed outside of a sound-treated environment, are provided. Practical considerations are presented, including examples of available tools for ambient noise monitoring, selection of test locations, and transducer attenuation. These are discussed in the context of calculating MPANLs and how best to ensure that ambient noise levels are not negatively impacting the validity of hearing thresholds.

Bone conduction reception: head sensitivity mapping

This study sought to identify skull locations that are highly sensitive to bone conduction (BC) auditory signal reception and could be used in the design of military radio communication headsets. In Experiment 1, pure tone signals were transmitted via BC to 11 skull locations of 14 volunteers seated in a quiet environment. In Experiment 2, the same signals were transmitted via BC to nine skull locations of 12 volunteers seated in an environment with 60 decibels of white background noise. Hearing threshold levels for each signal per location were measured. In the quiet condition, the condyle had the lowest mean threshold for all signals followed by the jaw angle, mastoid and vertex. In the white noise condition, the condyle also had the lowest mean threshold followed by the mastoid, vertex and temple. Overall results of both experiments were very similar and implicated the condyle as the most effective location.