Usefulness of routine pre-operative chest radiography for anaesthetic management: a prospective multicentre pilot study:

Total Joint Arthroplasty in the Patient with Inflammatory Arthritis: A Review

Inflammatory arthritis is a family of conditions including rheumatoid arthritis, juvenile inflammatory arthritis, and spondyloarthropathies affecting both the large and small joints. Total joint arthroplasty is commonly used for surgical management of end-stage disease. Preoperative and postoperative considerations as well as perioperative medical management and intraoperative treatment of patients with inflammatory arthritis undergoing total joint arthroplasty are reviewed. Although individualized, multidisciplinary approaches to treatment are necessary due to the complex nature of the disease and the varying levels of severity, patients generally have favorable outcomes with respect to pain scores and functional outcomes.

Factors influencing preoperative chest radiography request for elective endoscopic procedures among medical personnel

Background

Chest radiography is not routinely recommended before elective endoscopies. A high incidence of perioperative chest radiography requests was observed at our institution. This study aims to investigate factors influencing preoperative chest radiography request for patients undergoing elective gastrointestinal (GI) endoscopies.

Methods

This cross-sectional clinical study recruited 264 participants from different medical specialties who were responsible for preoperative endoscopic chest x-ray (CXR) ordering including anesthesiologists, surgeons and gastroenterologists. They completed questionnaires exploring their general knowledge and attitudes about preoperative chest radiography. Demographic characteristic of the participants affecting the knowledge on preoperative chest radiography was determined. A Structural Equation Model (SEM) was constructed from validated conceptual framework to find causal relationships between hypothesized factors and intention for preoperative endoscopic chest radiography request. Statistical analyses were performed using the SPSS software version 18.0 and Analysis of Moment Structures (AMOS) version 18.0.

Results

The questionnaire response rate was 53.79%. Baseline general knowledge on preoperative chest radiography of the participants was comparable. The SEM results showed unsupported relationship between hypothesized factors and the intention for preprocedural GI endoscopic CXR request (p < 0.1).

Conclusions

General knowledge of medical personnel on tuberculosis needs improvement. To rectify the unnecessary chest radiography request before elective GI endoscopic procedures, awareness of the patients’ health conditions, adherence to the hospital’s policy and realizing of possible patient-related mishaps are not the determinants for preprocedural endoscopic chest radiography request. Future works are required to explore other alternative factors involved for reducing chest radiography requests which are not indicated.

The Effectiveness of Full-body EOS Compared With Conventional Chest X-ray in Preoperative Evaluation of the Chest for Patients Undergoing Spine Operations: A Preliminary Study

STUDY DESIGN

A prospective radiographic comparative study.

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this study was to compare full-body EOS with conventional chest X-ray (CXR) for use in the preoperative evaluation of the chest in patients undergoing spine operations.

SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA

The full-body EOS reproduces an image of the chest similar to a routine CXR. The potential for the former replacing the latter is plausible. This is especially applicable in spine patients who would routinely have a preoperative full-body EOS performed.

METHODS

A radiographic comparative study of 266 patients was conducted at a single tertiary center from January 2013 to July 2016. Each patient had EOS and CXR done in random order <2 weeks apart. Two radiologists reported the image findings using a checklist. A third radiologist was consulted in cases of discrepancy. Interobserver agreement was calculated using Gwet AC1 and a comparison between EOS and CXR findings was analyzed using paired Chi-squared test. Multivariate analysis was performed to identify predictors for abnormal radiological findings. The institutional ethics committee approved this prospective study and waiver of informed consent was obtained.

RESULTS

There were 84 males (31.6%) and 182 females (68.4%). The mean age was 38.9 years (SD = 25.0 years). High interobserver agreement was found for EOS and CXR (Gwet AC1 0.993 and 0.988, respectively). There were no significant differences between both imaging modalities. Rare diagnoses precluded comparison of certain conditions. Age >18 years [odds ratio (OR) 7.69; P = 0.009] and American Society of Anesthesiologists physical status 3 (OR 6.64; P = 0.018) were independent predictors of abnormal radiological findings.

CONCLUSION

EOS is not inferior to, and may be used to replace CXR in preoperative radiological screening of thoracic conditions especially in low-risk patients ≤18 years old and patients with ASA <3. Preoperative assessment should never rely on a single modality. High-risk patients should be sent for a thorough work-up before spine surgery.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

4.

Frequency of abnormal findings on routine chest radiography before cardiac surgery

OBJECTIVE

Preoperative chest radiograph screening is widely used before cardiac surgery. The objective of this study was to investigate the frequency of abnormal findings on a routine chest radiograph before cardiac surgery.

METHODS

In this retrospective cohort study, 1136 patients were included. Patients were scheduled for cardiac surgery and underwent a preoperative chest radiograph. The primary outcome was the frequency of abnormalities on the chest radiograph. Secondary outcome was the effect of those abnormalities on surgery.

RESULTS

One half of the patients (570/1136; 50%) had 1 or more abnormalities on the chest radiograph. Most frequent abnormalities were cardiomegaly, aortic elongation, signs of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, vertebral fractures or height loss, possible pulmonary or mediastinal mass, pleural effusion, and atelectasis. In 2 patients (2/1136; 0.2%), the chest radiograph led to postponement of surgery, whereas in none of the patients the surgery was cancelled. In 1 patient (1/1136; 0.1%) the surgical approach was altered and in 15 patients (15/1136; 1.3%) further analysis was performed without having an impact on the planned surgical approach.

CONCLUSIONS

Although abnormalities are frequently found on preoperative chest radiographs before cardiac surgery, change in clinical management with regard to planned surgery or surgical approach occurs infrequently.

Prevalence and predictors of myocardial ischemia by preoperative myocardial perfusion single photon emission computed tomography in patients undergoing noncardiac surgery

BACKGROUND

The prevalence and predictors of myocardial ischemia before noncardiac surgery are unknown. In addition the predictive value of myocardial perfusion single-photon emission computed tomography (SPECT) before noncardiac in individual patients is uncertain.

OBJECTIVE

Evaluate the prevalence and predictors of myocardial ischemia before noncardiac surgery, and determine the postoperative cardiac outcome based on results of myocardial perfusion SPECT.

DESIGN

Retrospective.

SETTING

Single tertiary care center.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

We reviewed the records of adult patients diagnosed with myocardial ischemia by myocardial perfusion SPECT who were undergoing noncardiac surgery. Myocardial perfusion SPECT had been performed within 4 weeks prior to noncardiac surgery requiring general anesthesia.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

Prevalence of abnormal myocardial perfusion SPECT results on preoperative evaluation; abnormal myocardial perfusion SPECT results as a predictor for postoperative cardiac events such as cardiac death, nonfatal myocardial infarction, and unstable angina.

RESULTS

Of 131 patients who underwent noncardiac surgery from February 2015 to April 2016, 84 (64%) patients were female and the mean (SD) age was 64.1 (13.6) years. The prevalence of abnormal myocardial perfusion SPECT was 18% (24 of 131). Normal myocardial perfusion SPECT was highly predictive (up to 100%), but a positive myocardial perfusion SPECT had low positive predictive value (4%). Variables associated with an abnormal myocardial perfusion SPECT included ischemic heart disease, congestive heart failure, ASA score of 3 or more, limited exercise capacity (less than 4 METs), male sex, hypercholesterolemia, hypertension, smoking, and abnormal ECG. In a multivariable analysis, history of ischemic heart disease and history of smoking were significant predictors of abnormal myocardial perfusion SPECT (P=.001, and .029, respectively).

CONCLUSIONS

Because of the low positive predictive value of myocardial perfusion SPECT, utilization of the technique in the workup of cardiac patients undergoing noncardiac surgery has been inappropriate. Myocardial perfusion SPECT should be restricted to only clearly defined appropriate use criteria.

LIMITATIONS

Relatively small number of patients and retrospective design.

Cost Savings Opportunities in Perioperative Management of the Patients With Orthopaedic Trauma

Considerable opportunities for cost savings exist surrounding the perioperative management of patients with orthopaedic fracture and trauma. Scientific evidence is available to support each potential cost savings measure. Much of these data had been documented for years but has never been adhered to, resulting in millions of dollars in unnecessary testing and treatment. Careful attention to preoperative laboratory testing can save huge amounts of money and expedite medical clearance for injured patients. The use of a dedicated orthopaedic trauma operating room has been shown to improve resource utilization, decrease costs, and surgical complications. A variety of anesthetic techniques and agents can reduce operative time, recovery room time, and hospital lengths of stay. Strict adherence to blood utilization protocols, appropriate deep venous thrombosis prophylaxis, and multimodal postoperative pain control with oversight from dedicated hip fracture hospitalists is critical to cost containment. Careful attention to postoperative disposition to acute care and management of postoperative testing and radiographs can also be another area of cost containment. Institutional protocols must be created and followed by a team of orthopaedic surgeons, hospitalists, and anesthesiologists to significantly impact the costs associated with care of patient with orthopaedic trauma and fracture.

Perioperative management of patients with rheumatic diseases

This paper aims to explore the assessment of patients with rheumatologic diseases, especially rheumatoid arthritis (RA), before undergoing orthopedic surgery. Perioperative assessment ensures an early diagnosis of the patient's medical condition, overall health, medical co-morbidities, and the assessment of the risk factors associated with the proposed procedures. Perioperative assessment allows for proper postoperative management of complications and of the management of drugs such as disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drugs (DMARD) and anti-platelets, and corticosteroids. The assessment also supports follow up plans, and patient education. Perioperative assessment enables the discussion of the proposed treatment plans and the factors associated with them in each case among the different specialists involved to facilitate an appropriate early decision-making about the assessment and treatment of patients with rheumatologic diseases. It also enables the discussion of both condition and procedure with the patient to ensure a good postoperative care. The article identifies the components of perioperative medical evaluation, discusses perioperative management of co-morbidities and the management of specific clinical problems related to RA, systemic lupus erythematosus, the management of DMARDs, like methotrexate (MTX) and biologic therapies, prophylactic antibiotics, and postoperative follow up, including patient education and rehabilitation.