General anesthesia versus regional anesthesia

Protease-Activated Receptors (PARs): Biology and Therapeutic Potential in Perioperative Stroke

Perioperative stroke is a devastating complication that occurs during surgery or within 30 days following the surgical procedure. Its prevalence ranges from 0.08 to 10% although it is most likely an underestimation, as sedatives and narcotics can substantially mask symptomatology and clinical presentation. Understanding the underlying pathophysiology and identifying potential therapeutic targets are of paramount importance. Protease-activated receptors (PARs), a unique family of G-protein-coupled receptors, are widely expressed throughout the human body and play essential roles in various physiological and pathological processes. This review elucidates the biology and significance of PARs, outlining their diverse functions in health and disease, and their intricate involvement in cerebrovascular (patho)physiology and neuroprotection. PARs exhibit a dual role in cerebral ischemia, which underscores their potential as therapeutic targets to mitigate the devastating effects of stroke in surgical patients.

The Efficacy and Safety of Diazepam for Intraoperative Blood Pressure Stabilization in Hypertensive Patients Undergoing Vitrectomy Under Nerve Block Anesthesia: A Prospective, Single-Center, Double-Blind, Randomized, Controlled Trial

Purpose

To evaluate the effectiveness and safety of diazepam in maintaining stable intraoperative blood pressure (BP) in hypertensive patients undergoing vitrectomy under nerve block anesthesia.

Methods

A total of 180 hypertensive patients undergoing vitrectomy with nerve block anesthesia were randomized into two groups. The intervention group was given oral diazepam 60 min before operation, while the control group was given oral placebo 60 min before operation. The primary outcome is the effective rate of intraoperative BP control, defined as systolic blood pressure (SBP) during the operation maintained < 160 mmHg at all timepoints. The logistic regression model will be performed to analyze the compare risk factors for ineffective BP control.

Results

The effective rate of intraoperative SBP control in the diazepam group was significant higher than that in the placebo group from 15 min to 70 min of the surgery (P < 0.05). The proportion of patients with SBP ≥180 mmHg at any timepoint from operation to 1 h postoperation was higher in the placebo group (12.22%) than in the diazepam group (2.22%) (P = 0.0096). We observed that the change in SBP from baseline consistently remained higher in the placebo group than in the diazepam group. In the logistic regression analysis, age, years of diagnosed hypertension and SBP 1h before surgery were significant risk factors for ineffective BP control.

Conclusion

This study provides robust evidence supporting the effectiveness of oral diazepam as a pre-surgery intervention in maintaining stable blood pressure during vitrectomy in hypertensive patients.

Trial Registration

Chinese Clinical Trial Registry (ChiCTR), ChiCTR2100041772.

Spinal versus general anesthesia in retrograde intrarenal surgery

AIM

The indications for retrograde intrarenal surgery (RIRS) have greatly increased, however, there is still no consensus on the use of spinal anesthesia (SA) during this procedure. The aim of this study was to evaluate the comparability of surgical outcomes of RIRS performed under SA versus general GA for renal stones.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

This was a retrospective, observational study in patients scheduled for RIRS in a single teaching hospital in Turkey. Inclusion criteria were age > 18 years and the presence of single or multiple renal stones. We recorded information concerning the site of lithiasis, the number of calculi, total stone burden, and the presence of concomitant ureteral stones or hydronephrosis. Results were evaluated in terms of surgical outcome, intraoperative and postoperative complications. Patients were followed-up until day 90 from discharge.

RESULTS

The data of 502 patients, 252 in GA group and 250 in SA group, were evaluated. The stone-free rate was 81% in the GA group and 85% in the SA group (p = 0.12). No cases of conversion from SA to GA were recorded. Complication rates were similar in the 2 groups (19% vs 14.5%, p = 0.15).

CONCLUSIONS

In our cohort, RIRS performed under SA and GA was equivalent in terms of surgical results and complications.

Bilateral brachial plexus block as alternative to general anaesthesia in high-risk patient; a case report and literature review

Introduction

Bilateral brachial plexus blocks can be an alternative to general anaesthesia in the surgery of arm, forearm, wrist, or hand. This study aims to report a case in which a risky patient underwent amputation surgery under regional anaesthesia.

Case presentation

A 64-year-old male was admitted to the hospital for an amputation operation. Ultrasonography revealed normal findings regarding internal organs, aside from grade II increased echogenicity of both kidneys and a small bladder cyst. Echocardiography revealed mildly left ventricular dilation, moderate systolic left ventricular dysfunction, ejection fraction 38%, left ventricular wall hypokinesia with left ventricular dilation. The amputation was performed under a bilateral supraclavicular brachial plexus block with the guidance of ultrasound.

Discussion

Theoretically, there are some advantages to regional anaesthesia in comparison to general anaesthesia, such as decreasing the ordinary body response to stress in the presence of low levels of cortisol and catecholamines, increasing blood flow and peripheral vasodilatation, decreasing hypercoagulability, lower risk of arterial and venous thrombosis and it aids to prevent endotracheal intubation and mechanical ventilation.

Conclusion

Bilateral brachial plexus blocks, as a type of regional anaesthesia under ultrasound guidance, can be depended upon as a reliable substitute for general anaesthesia in perilous conditions.

•

Bilateral brachial plexus blocks (BBPB) are a kind of regional anaesthesia that can be used instead of general anaesthesia.

•

Several complications may be encountered during the process of BBPB, including diaphragmatic paralysis.

•

In this study, BBPB has been discussed with literature review.

Flexible Ureterorenoscopy under Spinal Anesthesia: Focus on Technique, Results, Complications, and Patients' Satisfaction from a Large Series

INTRODUCTION

Although spinal anesthesia (SA) may reduce postoperative morbidity, most urologists perform flexible ureterorenoscopy (fURS) under general anesthesia (GA). The objective of our study is to provide technical details, results, complications, and patients' satisfaction with fURS performed under exclusive SA.

METHODS

We analyzed all consecutive fURS performed under SA to treat renal stones from March 2011 to February 2017. Details of technique, operative time, outcomes, need for further treatments, complications, and patients' satisfaction were evaluated.

RESULTS

Two hundred thirty-four fURS under SA were considered. SA was performed through L2-L3 vertebral interspace in 64.1%. Patients were discharged the same day of surgery. Mean stone burden was 13.5 ± 6.6 mm and mean operative time 76.9 ± 34.6 min. Single-procedure SFR was 69.7%. Further treatments were performed in 22.8%. 96.6% had no anesthesia-related complications. No Clavien-Dindo grade ≥ IIIb complications were noticed. 99.6% of patients were satisfied with SA. No cases of conversion from SA to GA occurred.

CONCLUSION

fURS can be performed safely and efficiently under SA, taking into account a few details of the technique. Patients' satisfaction with SA is very high, and complications are rare. Although SA is usually adopted in unfit patients for GA, it may be considered as a viable alternative in fit patients.

Spinal versus general anesthesia during retrograde intra-renal surgery: A propensity score matching analysis

Background:

The indications for retrograde intra-renal surgery (RIRS) have greatly increased, however, there is still no consensus on the use of spinal anesthesia (SA) during this procedure. The aim of this study was to evaluate the comparability of surgical conditions and outcomes with RIRS performed under SA versus general anesthesia (GA) for renal stones.

Materials and methods:

This was a prospective, observational study in patients scheduled for RIRS in a single teaching hospital in Italy. Inclusion criteria were age >18 years and the presence of single or multiple renal stones. We recorded information concerning the site of lithiasis, the number of calculi, total stone burden, and the presence of concomitant ureteral stones or hydronephrosis. A propensity score-matched analysis was performed to evaluate the results in terms of surgical outcome, intraoperative and postoperative complications, and analgesia demand balanced for confounding factors. Patients were followed-up until day 90 from discharge.

Results:

We included 120 patients, the propensity score-matched cohort included 40 patients in the SA and 40 in the GA groups. The stone-free rate was 67.5% in the GA group and 70.0% in the SA group (p = 0.81). The use of auxiliary procedures within 90 days did not differ between groups (25.0% vs. 22.5%, p = 0.79). No cases of conversion from SA to GA were recorded. We did not find any differences in intraoperative bleedings, perforations, and abortions. Complication rates were similar in the 2 groups (10.0% in GA vs. 5.0% in SA, p = 0.64).

Conclusions:

In our cohort, RIRS performed under SA and GA was equivalent in terms of surgical results and complications.

Comparative efficacy of Neuraxial and general anesthesia for hip fracture surgery: a meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials

Background

The choice of anesthesia technique remains debatable in patients undergoing surgical repair of hip fracture. This meta-analysis was performed to compare the effect of neuraxial (epidural/spinal) versus general anesthesia on perioperative outcomes in patients undergoing hip fracture surgery.

Methods

Medline, Cochrane Library, Science-Direct, and EMBASE databases were searched to identify eligible studies focused on the comparison between neuraxial and general anesthesia in hip fracture patients between January 2000 and May 2019. Perioperative outcomes were extracted for systemic analysis. Sensitivity analyses were conducted using a Bonferroni correction and the leave-one-out method. The evidence quality for each outcome was evaluated by the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) system.

Results

Nine randomized controlled trials (RCTs) including 1084 patients fulfilled our selection criteria. The outcomes for the meta-analysis showed that there were no significant differences in the 30-day mortality (OR = 1.34, 95% CI 0.56, 3.21; P = 0.51), length of stay (MD = − 0.65, 95% CI -0.32, 0.02; P = 0.06), and the prevalence of delirium (OR = 1.05, 95% CI 0.27, 4.00; P = 0.95), acute myocardial infarction (OR = 0.88, 95% CI 0.17, 4.65; P = 0.88), deep venous thrombosis (OR = 0.48, 95% CI 0.09, 2.72; P = 0.41), and pneumonia (OR = 1.04, 95% CI 0.23, 4.61; P = 0.96) for neuraxial anesthesia compared to general anesthesia, and there was a significant difference in blood loss between the two groups (MD = − 137.8, 95% CI -241.49, − 34.12; p = 0.009). However, after applying the Bonferroni correction for multiple testing, all the adjusted p-values were above the significant threshold of 0.05. The evidence quality for each outcome evaluated by the GRADE system was low.

Conclusions

In summary, our present study demonstrated that there might be a difference in blood loss between patients receiving neuraxial and general anaesthesia, however, this analysis was not robust to adjustment for multiple testing and therefore at high risk for a type I error. Due to small sample size and enormous inconsistency in the choice of outcome measures, more high-quality studies with large sample size are needed to clarify this issue.

Anesthetic agent etiomidate induces apoptosis in N2a brain tumor cell line

The present study identified the cytotoxic effects of etomidate on the N2a neuroblastoma cell line. Etomidate induced apoptosis in N2a cells in a concentration-dependent manner, which was confirmed by western blotting and flow cytometry. Phase contrast microscopy was used to analyze the effect of etomidate on morphological characteristics. The number of the apoptotic cells was increased and confirmed by DAPI and PI staining, which served as a characteristic hallmark of apoptosis. Additionally, etomidate led to loss of mitochondrial membrane potential and resulted in the generation of reactive oxygen species in N2a cells. The western blot analysis revealed that N2a cells treated with etomidate had a significant modulation of pro-apoptotic proteins, includingpoly ADP-ribose polymerase (PARP), cleaved PARP, caspase-9 and procaspase-3. In conclusion, the present study determined that etomidate induced cytotoxic and apoptotic effects in N2a brain tumor cells in vitro.

Impact of Anesthesia on Hospital Mortality and Morbidities in Geriatric Patients Following Emergency Hip Fracture Surgery

OBJECTIVES

To determine the impact of anesthesia type on in-hospital mortality and morbidity for geriatric fragility hip fracture surgery.

DESIGN

Retrospective cohort study.

SETTING

Integrates health care delivery system across 38 facilities in the United States.

PATIENTS/PARTICIPANTS

We identified 16,695 patients 65 years of age and older who underwent emergent hip fracture repairs between 2009 and 2014 through the Kaiser Permanente hip fracture registry and excluded pathologic or bilateral fractures.

INTERVENTION

Hip fracture surgery with general or regional anesthesia.

MAIN OUTCOMES MEASURES

Data on in-hospital mortality, time to death, discharge disposition, and length of stay (LOS) were analyzed among the following anesthesia types: general anesthesia (GA), regional anesthesia (RA), and intraoperative conversions from regional to general (Cv).

RESULTS

Compared with RA, the hazard ratio for GA for in-hospital mortality was 1.38 and 2.23 for the Cv group; the time ratio for GA-associated time to death was 0.97 and 0.89 for the Cv group. The GA-associated time ratio for LOS before discharge was 1.01, and the hazard ratio for home discharge was 0.86, but no significance was found with the Cv group.

CONCLUSIONS

RA may offer advantages over GA for fragility hip fracture surgeries when possible. In-hospital mortality, time to death, increased LOS, and discharge to an institute rather than home were all adversely influenced by GA. Furthermore, the previously understudied Cv group demonstrated adverse outcomes for in-hospital mortality and time to death.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Therapeutic Level III. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

Nerve detection with optical spectroscopy for regional anesthesia procedures

Background

Regional anesthesia has several advantages over general anesthesia but requires accurate needle placement to be effective. To achieve accurate placement, a needle equipped with optical fibers that allows tissue discrimination at the needle tip based on optical spectroscopy is proposed. This study investigates the sensitivity and specificity with which this optical needle can discriminate nerves from the surrounding tissues making use of different classification methods.

Methods

Diffuse reflectance spectra were acquired from 1563 different locations from 19 human cadavers in the wavelength range of 400–1710 nm; measured tissue types included fascicular tissue of the nerve, muscle, sliding fat and subcutaneous fat. Physiological parameters of the tissues were derived from the measured spectra and part of the data was directly compared to histology. Various classification methods were then applied to the derived parameter dataset to determine the accuracy with which fascicular tissue of the nerve can be discriminated from the surrounding tissues.

Results

From the parameters determined from the measured spectra of the various tissues surrounding the nerve, fat content, blood content, beta-carotene content and scattering were most distinctive when comparing fascicular and non-fascicular tissue. Support Vector Machine classification with a combination of feature selections performed best in discriminating fascicular nerve tissue from the surrounding tissues with a sensitivity and specificity around 90 %.

Conclusions

This study showed that spectral tissue sensing, based on diffuse reflectance spectroscopy at the needle tip, is a promising technique to discriminate fascicular tissue of the nerve from the surrounding tissues. The technique may therefore improve accurate needle placement near the nerve which is necessary for effective nerve blocks in regional anesthesia.

Neuroaxial versus general anaesthesia in geriatric patients for hip fracture surgery: does it matter?

The influence of the mode of anaesthesia on outcome of geriatric patients with hip fractures is a controversial issue in the medical literature. In the light of an ageing society, a conclusive answer to this question is of growing importance. The purpose of this review was to assess the effect of neuroaxial and general anaesthesia on mortality and morbidity in geriatric patients sustaining a hip fracture. Following a current literature search within the Pubmed and Cochrane database (1967-2010), 34 randomised controlled trials, 14 observational studies and eight reviews/meta-analysis publications were included. Potentially outcome-influencing factors such as mortality, deep vein thrombosis, pulmonary embolism, postoperative confusion and other anaesthesia-related outcomes were evaluated. After analysing the current literature with 56 references, covering 18,715 patients with hip fracture, it can be concluded that spinal anaesthesia is associated with significantly reduced early mortality, fewer incidents of deep vein thrombosis, less acute postoperative confusion, a tendency to fewer myocardial infarctions, fewer cases of pneumonia, fatal pulmonary embolism and postoperative hypoxia. General anaesthesia has the advantages of having a lower incidence of hypotension and a tendency towards fewer cerebrovascular accidents compared to neuroaxial anaesthesia. Otherwise, general anaesthesia and respiratory diseases were significant predictors of morbidity in hip fracture patients. These data suggest that regional anaesthesia is the preferred technique, but the limited evidence available does not permit a definitive conclusion to be drawn for mortality or other outcomes. For hip fracture surgery, the choice of anaesthesia (general or neuroaxial) is made by the anaesthesiologist and is based on the patient's preference, comorbidities, potential general postoperative complications and the clinical experience of the anaesthesiologist. The overall therapeutic approach in hip fracture care should be determined jointly by the orthopaedic surgeon, the geriatrician and the anaesthesiologist (multidisciplinary approach).

Perioperative stroke after total joint arthroplasty: prevalence, predictors, and outcome

BACKGROUND

The risk of perioperative stroke following cardiac and carotid artery surgery is well documented. There is an apparent lack of recognition and appreciation of this complication after total joint arthroplasty. The present study was designed to determine the prevalence of, and outcome after, perioperative stroke following total joint arthroplasty. In addition, risk factors for the development of this complication were evaluated in an attempt to identify a strategy that could minimize the prevalence of this complication.

METHODS

We performed an observational study of 18,745 consecutive patients undergoing primary or revision total hip or total knee arthroplasty from 2000 to 2007 at our institution. The institutional perioperative stroke rate was 0.2% (thirty-six of 18,745). The thirty-six patients who had a stroke included seventeen men and nineteen women with a mean age of 68.2 years (range, forty-five to eighty-seven years). The average duration of follow-up for all patients and controls in the present study was sixty-two months (range, zero to 124.9 months). In a predictive model, different patient-related and surgery-related factors that could predispose patients to this complication and/or affect outcome were evaluated.

RESULTS

The first-year mortality among stroke patients was 25% (nine of thirty-six), and four of these nine patients died in the hospital following total joint arthroplasty. Of three patients who received emergency intra-arterial thrombolysis, two had complete neurologic recovery and one died in the hospital. The final regression model showed that a history of noncoronary heart disease, urgent (versus elective) surgery, general (versus regional) anesthesia, and an intraoperative arrhythmia or other alterations in the heart rate during surgery are significant predictors of perioperative stroke.

CONCLUSIONS

Perioperative stroke is a rare but potentially devastating complication of total joint arthroplasty, with a high rate of morbidity and mortality. Vigilant attention to prevent, detect, and treat this complication in a timely manner may alter the course of the disease.

Spinal anesthesia mediates improved early function and pain relief following surgical repair of ankle fractures

BACKGROUND

To our knowledge, no study to date has compared the use of spinal and general anesthesia in patients undergoing operative fixation of an unstable ankle fracture. The purpose of this study was to assess the effects of anesthesia type on postoperative pain and function in a large cohort of patients.

METHODS

Between October 2000 and November 2006, 501 patients who underwent surgical fixation of an unstable ankle fracture were followed prospectively. Patients receiving spinal anesthesia were compared with a cohort who received general anesthesia. All patients were evaluated at three, six, and twelve months postoperatively with use of standardized, validated general and limb-specific outcome instruments. Standard and multivariable analyses comparing outcomes at these intervals were performed.

RESULTS

Four hundred and sixty-six patients (93%) who had been followed for a minimum of one year met the inclusion criteria. Compared with the general anesthesia group, the spinal anesthesia group had a greater mean age (p = 0.005), higher classification on the American Society of Anesthesiologists system (p = 0.03), and a greater number of patients with diabetes (p = 0.02). There was no difference in sex distribution between the groups. At three months, patients who received spinal anesthesia had significantly better pain scores (p = 0.03) and total scores on the American Orthopaedic Foot and Ankle Society outcome instrument (p = 0.02). At six months, patients in the spinal anesthesia group continued to have better pain scores (p = 0.04), but there was no longer a difference in total scores (p = 0.06). At twelve months, no difference was detected between the groups in terms of functional or pain scores. There was no difference in complication rates between the groups.

CONCLUSIONS

Patients who undergo fixation of an ankle fracture under spinal anesthesia seem to experience less pain and have better function in the early postoperative period. We recommend that, unless there is a specific contraindication, patients should be offered spinal anesthesia when undergoing operative fixation of an ankle fracture.

Ischemic heart disease

Because of changing demographics, increasing numbers of patients with IHD are presenting for noncardiac surgery, and the risks of perioperative morbidity and mortality are significant. The Lee Cardiac Risk Index is applicable in defining perioperative cardiac risk: however, ACC/AHA guidelines may not be applicable comprehensively. The role of biomarkers in risk stratification still needs to be defined. Structured management protocols that help assess, diagnose, and treat patients with IHD preoperatively are likely to help decrease postoperative morbidity and mortality, but clearly are not applicable to all patients. Augmented hemodynamic control with beta-blockers or alpha-2 agonists and modulating inflammation by statins can play an important role in improving outcomes in many patients with IHD; preoperative coronary revascularization may be of limited value. Intraoperative anesthetic management that minimizes hemodynamic perturbations is important; however, the choice of a particular technique typically is not critical. Of critical importance is the postoperative management of the patient. Postoperative myocardial injury should be identified, evaluated, and managed aggressively. Secondary stresses such as sepsis, extubation, and anemia, which can increase demand on the heart, should be treated or minimized. Clearly, optimal care of the patient with IHD entails closely coordinated assessment and management throughout the preoperative, intraoperative, and postoperative phases, if one is to optimize short- and long-term outcomes.

Regional anesthesia in trauma patients

Medical and surgical treatment of the trauma patient has evolved in the last decade. Treatment of pain from multiple fractures or injured organs and surgical anesthesia with regional anesthesia techniques have been used to reduce post-traumatic stress disorder and reduce the adverse effects of general anesthesia. Neuraxial blocks and peripheral nerve block techniques should be practiced by trained emergency and operatory room staff. This article reviews recent publications related to the role of regional anesthesia in trauma patients in the prehospital, emergency, and operatory room settings. It also describes indications, limitations, and practical aspects of regional anesthesia.

Central venous pressure monitoring during living right donor hepatectomy

Low central venous pressure (CVP) has been advocated during liver resection to reduce blood loss and transfusion requirements. As a consequence, CVP catheter placement has been considered essential for hepatic surgery, including living donor hepatectomies. We retrospectively analyzed whether intraoperative management without CVP monitoring influenced fluid administration, blood loss, and patient outcome. Medical charts and hospital data system of 50 adult to adult living liver donors were retrospectively reviewed. Data collection included patient demographics, intraoperative variables such as fluid management, blood loss, urine output, and operating room time. Postoperative variables were collected during the postanesthesia care unit stay and for the first 24 hours after surgery. Patients were then grouped on the basis of the presence or absence of a CVP catheter. Data were reanalyzed and groups compared. Patient groups did not differ in terms of demographics at baseline. When divided into groups with CVP and without CVP, the presence of CVP did not result in decreased intraoperative fluid administration. All patients were hemodynamically stable, and renal function was not different between groups throughout hospitalization. Length of postanesthesia care unit and hospital stay was the same. There was no difference in the frequency of complications during the hospital stay and at 3 months' follow-up. CVP monitoring did not appear to reduce blood loss when compared with patients without CVP monitoring. In centers with extensive experience, CVP monitoring may not be necessary in this highly selective patient population.

The effects of the type of anesthesia on outcomes of lower extremity infrainguinal bypass

OBJECTIVE

Three main types of anesthesia are used for infrainguinal bypass: general endotracheal anesthesia (GETA), spinal anesthesia (SA), and epidural anesthesia (EA). We analyzed a large clinical database to determine whether the type of anesthesia had any effect on clinical outcomes in lower extremity bypass.

METHODS

This study is an analysis of a prospectively collected database by the National Surgical Quality Improvement Program (NSQIP) of the Veterans Affairs Medical Centers. All patients from 1995 to 2003 in the NSQIP database who underwent infrainguinal arterial bypass were identified via Current Procedural Terminology codes. The 30-day morbidity and mortality outcomes for various types of anesthesia were compared by using univariate analysis and multivariate logistic regression to control for confounders.

RESULTS

The NSQIP database identified 14,788 patients (GETA, 9757 patients; SA, 2848 patients; EA, 2183 patients) who underwent a lower extremity infrainguinal arterial bypass during the study period. Almost all patients (99%) were men, and the mean age was 65.8 years. The type of anesthesia significantly affected graft failure at 30 days. Compared with SA, the odds of graft failure were higher for GETA (odds ratio, 1.43; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.16-1.77; P = .001). There was no statistically significant difference in 30-day graft failure between EA and SA. Regarding cardiac events, defined as postoperative myocardial infarction or cardiac arrest, patients with normal functional status (activities of daily living independence) and no history of congestive heart failure or stroke did worse with GETA than with SA (odds ratio, 1.8; 95% CI, 1.32-2.48; P < .0001). There was no statistically significant difference between EA and SA in the incidence of cardiac events. GETA, when compared with SA and EA, was associated with more cases of postoperative pneumonia (odds ratio: 2.2 [95% CI, 1.1-4.4; P = .034]. There was no significant difference between EA and SA with regard to postoperative pneumonia. Compared with SA, GETA was associated with an increased odds of returning to the operating room (odds ratio, 1.40; 95% CI, 1.20-1.64; P < .001), as was EA (odds ratio, 1.17; 95% CI, 1.05-1.31; P = .005). GETA was associated with a longer surgical length of stay on univariate analysis, but not after controlling for confounders. There was no significant difference in 30-day mortality among the three groups with univariate or multivariate analyses.

CONCLUSIONS

Although GETA is the most common type of anesthesia used in infrainguinal bypasses, our results suggest that it is not the best strategy, because it is associated with significantly worse morbidity than regional techniques.

Staged anesthesia for combined carotid and coronary artery revascularization: a different approach

OBJECTIVE

Combined coronary artery bypass graft (CABG) surgery and carotid endarterectomy (CEA) are performed in an attempt to reduce the risk of postoperative stroke after CABG surgery in patients with significant or symptomatic carotid artery stenosis. The choice between regional and general anesthesia for CEA is still under debate. Regional anesthesia offers an excellent monitoring technique of the neurologic status of the awake patient during carotid clamping. In an attempt to improve monitoring of the neurologic status and avoid the use of temporary shunting in patients undergoing the combined procedure, a different approach is described combining regional anesthesia for CEA followed immediately by general anesthesia for CABG surgery.

DESIGN

Prospective nonrandomized case series.

SETTING

University hospital.

PARTICIPANTS

Twenty patients scheduled for combined CEA and CABG surgery underwent a "staged" anesthetic approach from January to December 2004.

INTERVENTIONS

Pulmonary, femoral artery, and urinary catheters were inserted under local anesthesia. A deep cervical plexus block was then performed and supplemented by a superficial cervical plexus block. The patient was draped for standard combined CEA and CABG surgery. CEA was then performed using standard techniques. Without altering the surgical field, general anesthesia was given and endotracheal intubation performed following the successful CEA. Coronary revascularization was then completed.

MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS

CEA and CABG surgery were completed successfully in all patients. There was no need for conversion from local to general anesthesia. Endotracheal intubation was easily performed in all patients. There was no hospital mortality in this series. No neurologic events were observed during the CEA. A reversible ischemic stroke, ipsilateral to the CEA, occurred postoperatively on awakening from CABG surgery in 1 patient.

CONCLUSIONS

This staged anesthetic approach for combined CABG and CEA surgery is an alternative in this complex subset of patients.

Division of pedicles by stapling during cytoreductive surgery for ovarian cancer

OBJECTIVE

To determine the potential of dividing vascular pedicles by stapling to reduce operative time, blood loss, and morbidity associated with cytoreductive operations for advanced ovarian cancer.

METHODS

A case-control study was undertaken to compare operative outcomes for patients undergoing primary cytoreductive operations for ovarian cancer using two different operative strategies. Between 2002 and 2004, both stapling and conventional techniques were used to divide vascular pedicles for 50 consecutive patients requiring modified posterior exenterations (en-bloc resection of internal reproductive organs, pelvic peritoneum, and recto-sigmoid colon) and upper abdominal procedures in the context of primary cytoreduction for stage IIIC and IV ovarian cancer. The operative time, blood loss, transfusion rate, hospitalization, and incidence of complications were compared to outcomes of 50 consecutive patients operated on between 1994 and 1997 for whom stapling was not used to divide pedicles (chi-square test for binomial data, and t-test analysis for continuous data).

RESULTS

Both groups were equivalent with respect to disease severity, extent of upper abdominal surgery, and cytoreductive outcomes. The group for whom stapling devises were used to divide pedicles had a significantly reduced total operative time 179 min vs. 284 min, P < 0.001), estimated blood loss (1170 ml vs. 1782 ml, P = 0.004), and transfusion rate (3.6 units packed red cells vs. 5.0 units packed red blood cells, P = 0.03).

CONCLUSION

Stapling of vascular pedicles significantly reduces the operative time and blood loss for patients undergoing extensive primary cytoreductive operations for advanced ovarian cancer.

Choice of anesthetics

The choice of anesthetics for vascular surgical patients is not only determined by the kind and extent of the surgical procedure but also by patient comorbidities. Frequently, patients have a history of hypertension, peripheral vascular and coronary artery disease,cerebrovascular disease, and renal impairment. The goal of the chosen anesthetic technique is to protect organ function, mainly of the brain and the heart. In some instances regional anesthesia might be preferred, but no difference in outcome between the two techniques has been shown conclusively. Vascular emergencies are particularly challenging for the anesthesiologist, but in recent years the development of stent graft insertion has improved the short-term outcome in many of these procedures.

Assessment and management of patients with ischemic heart disease

OBJECTIVE

Review the perioperative management of patients who are scheduled for noncardiac surgery.

DATA SOURCE

Review of literature (PubMed, MEDLINE).

CONCLUSIONS

Patients with ischemic heart disease who undergo noncardiac surgery are at significant risk of perioperative cardiac morbidity and mortality. Recent joint guidelines from the American College of Cardiology and American Heart Association have significantly streamlined the preoperative evaluation processes. Augmented hemodynamic control with intensive perioperative pharmacologic therapy with beta-blockers and possibly alpha-2 agonist has been shown to improve perioperative cardiovascular outcomes. However, translating this information to clinical practice continues to be a challenge and requires a multi- disciplinary approach. A particular intraoperative anesthetic technique is unlikely to influence perioperative cardiac morbidity and mortality. Postoperative management with goals of decreasing hemodynamic stress is important in patients with ischemic heart disease. Diagnosis and management of perioperative myocardial infarction continues to be a challenge. However, use of cardiac specific biomarkers should improve the diagnostic process.

Regional Anaesthesia in the Elderly

The number of elderly patients presenting for anaesthesia and surgery has increased exponentially in recent years. Regional anaesthesia is frequently used in elderly patients undergoing surgery. Although the type of anaesthesia (general versus regional anaesthesia) has no substantial effect on perioperative morbidity and mortality in any age group; it intuitively makes sense that elderly patients would benefit from regional anaesthesia because they remain minimally sedated throughout the procedures and awaken with excellent postoperative pain control. However, a multitude of factors influence the outcome, such as the type, duration and invasiveness of the operation, co-existing medical and mental status of the patient and the skill and expertise of the anaesthesiologist and surgeon. These factors make it difficult to decide if and when one technique is equivocally better than another. Thus, it is more important to optimise the overall management of the patient during the perioperative period and, in most cases, it is the quality of the anaesthetic administered rather than the type of anaesthetic which is most important. Sedatives used for regional anaesthesia in the elderly should be short acting, easy to administer, have a low adverse effect profile and high safety margin. Midazolam, lorazepam, ketamine, propofol and low-dose opioids have been successfully used for sedation in the elderly. Aging affects the pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of local anaesthetics, composition and characteristics of tissues and organs within the body, and physiological functions of the body. Changes in the systematic absorption, distribution and clearance of local anaesthetics lead to an increased sensitivity, decreased dose requirement and a change in the onset and duration of action in the elderly. Decreases in neural population, neural conduction velocity and inter-Schwann cell distance can lead to an increased sensitivity to local anaesthetics in the elderly. The addition of an opioid and epinephrine (adrenaline) has been shown to be useful in central neuraxial blockade. Epinephrine also can prolong the duration of peripheral nerve blocks. However, caution must be exercised as epinephrine has the potential for causing ischaemic neurotoxicity in peripheral nerves. Regional anaesthesia appears to be safe and beneficial in elderly patients; however, every anaesthetic administered must be assessed on a case-by-case basis and particular consideration should be given to the health status of the patient, the operation being performed and the expertise of the anaesthesiologist.

Irrigational therapy of a dentigerous cyst in a geriatric patient: a case report

Dentigerous cysts are recognized as one of the most common lesions of the jaws. Although surgical enucleation is usually the preferred treatment method, it is not always the best choice for elderly patients who have other medical complications. With cyst irrigational therapy, repeated irrigation allows bone regeneration around the cyst to progress more rapidly than that around a cyst treated operatively with marsupialization. We used irrigational therapy to treat a dentigerous cyst in a 72-year-old man who did not agree to surgery because he had no symptoms associated with the cyst, and he had other medical complications. After one year, remarkable bone regeneration was observed. We conclude that irrigational therapy appears to be an effective, less-invasive alternative to surgery for geriatric patients.