Comparative evaluation of digital radiography versus conventional radiography of fractured skulls

Strict X-ray beam collimation for facial bones examination can increase lens exposure

OBJECTIVES

It is well accepted that collimation is a cost-effective dose-reducing tool for X-ray examinations. This phantom-based study investigated the impact of X-ray beam collimation on radiation dose to the lenses of the eyes and thyroid along with the effect on image quality in facial bone radiography.

METHODS

A three-view series (occipitomental, occipitomental 30 and lateral) was investigated, and radiation doses to the lenses and thyroid were measured using an Unfors dosemeter. Images were assessed by six experienced observers using a visual grading analysis and a total of 5400 observations were made.

RESULTS

Strict collimation significantly (p<0.0001) reduced the radiation dose to the lenses of the eyes and thyroid when using a fixed projection-specific exposure. With a variable exposure technique (fixed exit dose, to simulate the behaviour of an automatic exposure control), while strict collimation was again shown to reduce thyroid dose, higher lens doses were demonstrated when compared with larger fields of exposure. Image quality was found to significantly improve using strict collimation, with observer preference being demonstrated using visual grading characteristic curves.

CONCLUSION

The complexities of optimising radiographic techniques have been shown and the data presented emphasise the importance of examining dose-reducing strategies in a comprehensive way.

Imaging of maxillofacial trauma: Evolutions and emerging revolutions

The aim of diagnostic imaging for maxillofacial trauma is to provide additional information that can positively influence medical or surgical patient management. Current advances in diagnostic imaging have come from the confluence of 3 driving forces: (1) the demand from clinicians to enhance and expand their diagnostic abilities; (2) the development of new theoretical concepts by basic scientists; and (3) the application of concepts by engineers and manufacturers to provide increasingly sophisticated imaging capabilities. The role of imaging within the health care environment is, however, also buffeted by the complex, sometimes competing, interactions of external social, political, economic, and technological pressures at the national, regional, and local levels. The purposes of this review are to provide a perspective on current imaging modalities used for maxillofacial trauma and to provide an insight into the influences, both technologic and external, on future developments and applications.

Quality of film-based and digital panoramic radiography

OBJECTIVES

To compare the image quality of panoramic radiographs obtained with storage phosphor plate and screen-film systems.

METHODS

Panoramic radiographs were taken in 60 patients both with film and with a storage phosphor plate system (30 with DenOptix (Dentsply/Gendex) and 30 with Digora PCT). The images were obtained with either the Cranex Tome or the Scanora multimodal X-ray unit. The screen-film combination was Lanex medium/Curix Ortho HT-G. The digital images were displayed as 8-bit images with a 300 dpi resolution on a 19" monitor and the film images were placed on a light box adjacent to the screen. Ten observers evaluated diagnostic image quality by means of visual grading analysis of different anatomical structures. The structures were scored as being visualized much better (5), better (4), equal (3), worse (2) or much worse (1) in the digital images than in the film images. The mean number of patients receiving the different scores was calculated. Statistical methods used were Wilcoxon sign rank test and Mann-Whitney test.

RESULTS

On average, visualization was equal in 19 of the 30 patients imaged using Digora PCT; in 10 it was worse. The corresponding values for DenOptix were 20 and 9. The difference between the film-based and the digital images was small but statistically significant (P<0.0001). The difference between the two image plate systems was not statistically significant (P>/=0.17).

CONCLUSIONS

It was concluded that digital panoramic radiographs are equivalent to film-based images for most purposes.

Digital radiographs in the assessment of distal radius fracture parameters

The purpose of the current study was to assess the reliability of measurement of distal radius fracture parameters using digital radiographs. Digital radiographs and corresponding plain radiographs of the wrists of 20 patients with intraarticular distal radius fractures were used to measure radial inclination, palmar tilt, radial height, and articular step-off. The plain radiographs and digital images were evaluated independently by three examiners in two sessions. The plain radiographs were assessed using a standard goniometer (manual measurements) whereas the digitized radiographs were evaluated using imaging software to do the computer-assisted measurements. The interobserver and intraobserver reliability were measured using repeated measures analysis of variance and weighted kappa statistics. Measurement of the digital images improved the interobserver reliability of measurement of palmar tilt from substantial to excellent, radial height from moderate to substantial, and articular step-off from fair to moderate. Similarly, intraobserver reliability increased from moderate to substantial when measuring radial height. In no instance (between or within observers) did the level of reliability decrease when using digital images for fracture evaluation. The current data suggest that the reliability of measurements of angular and linear fracture parameters of distal radius fractures is similar between plain and digital radiographs.

Digital radiology in skeletal trauma: assessment of casualty officers' performance

Radiographic images can now be produced without the requirement of film processing and development, and can be displayed rapidly on a computer monitor. We assessed junior doctors' performance in interpreting images from 25 patients being investigated for possible fracture and also compared the diagnostic abilities of casualty officers with those of radiology specialist registrars. For interpretation of images viewed at a workstation or as filmed laser images, respectively, sensitivities were 75% and 78%, and specificities were 65% and 76%. These differences were not significant. There was a tendency for radiology specialist registrars to be less specific when reviewing images at a workstation. The demonstration that there is no loss in diagnostic quality when casualty officers interpret fracture images in a purely digitally acquired and viewed format forms a robust basis for economic evaluation of the technology.

Picture archiving and communications systems (PACS)

Although there has been a recent increase in interest in picture archiving and communications systems (PACS) topics, little has been published to assist the non-technical person in understanding the complexities of the technologies required for a PACS implementation. This issue of Current Problems in Radiology defines each PACS component and explains why each is important in a system design. PACS installations at the University of Florida are used as examples to tie the concepts together. The infrastructure required for PACS consists of the information system interfaces, networks, and databases. Information system interfaces guarantee consistent patient data across all platforms and reduce labor requirements by eliminating duplicate data entry. Data networks move information from the originating location to users around the hospital, clinic, campus, city, or world. In the PACS environment, the data consist of patient and study information as well as images and information about these images. Databases organize the data from multiple sources into a coherent package that can be queried for many different purposes, such as retrieving images, reviewing patient and study information, studying practice statistics, and performing outcomes analysis. PACS components consist of acquisition nodes, archives, and output devices. Acquisition nodes may include "digital modalities" such as CT, MRI, nuclear medicine, and computed radiography (CR), along with devices to convert from analog to digital, such as digitizers and frame grabbers. Options for archives are discussed along with configuration schemes. Output devices include both hard copy (film and paper prints) and soft copy (workstations for display and diagnosis). Finally, a description of the PACS installations at the University of Florida is presented, with comments on some of the difficulties and complexities encountered. A discussion of the cost and benefits of PACS is included, along with a forecast of the future of PACS.