Parents' ratings of everyday cognitive abilities in very low birth weight children

Measurement Invariance of the ADHD Rating Scale-IV Home and School Versions Across Age, Gender, Clinical Status, and Informant

The present study aimed to investigate the measurement invariance across age, gender, clinical status, and informant of the Attention-Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder Rating Scale-IV (ADHD-RS-IV) Home and School versions. The participants were 1,106 Romanian children and adolescents (mean age = 12.74 years, standard deviation = 2.84, age range 6-18 years). Both parents and teachers assessed ADHD symptoms. The factorial structure of the scale was assessed using confirmatory factor analysis, and measurement invariance was assessed using multigroup confirmatory factor analysis. The results supported the reliability of the ADHD-RS-IV, with high internal consistency coefficients for both versions. Confirmatory factor analysis validated a two-factor model. Multigroup confirmatory factor analysis confirmed the measurement invariance of ADHD-RS-IV across age, gender, clinical status, and informant. ADHD-RS-IV had good psychometric properties in a sample of Romanian children and adolescents. It is a reliable instrument given its strong invariance. Implications for evidence-based assessment of ADHD are discussed.

Parents’ Observations of the Academic and Nonacademic Performance of Children with Strabismus

In this study, children with strabismus, as a group, had significantly more academic and nonacademic difficulties than did children without strabismus. However, since not all the children with strabismus had academic difficulties, other factors that are associated with strabismus, such as headache, eyestrain, perceptual difficulties, and frustration, may affect learning in some children with strabismus.

Language functions in preterm-born children: a systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE

Preterm-born children (<37 weeks' gestation) have higher rates of language function problems compared with term-born children. It is unknown whether these problems decrease, deteriorate, or remain stable over time. The goal of this research was to determine the developmental course of language functions in preterm-born children from 3 to 12 years of age.

METHODS

Computerized databases Embase, PubMed, Web of Knowledge, and PsycInfo were searched for studies published between January 1995 and March 2011 reporting language functions in preterm-born children. Outcome measures were simple language function assessed by using the Peabody Picture Vocabulary Test and complex language function assessed by using the Clinical Evaluation of Language Fundamentals. Pooled effect sizes (in terms of Cohen's d) and 95% confidence intervals (CI) for simple and complex language functions were calculated by using random-effects models. Meta-regression was conducted with mean difference of effect size as the outcome variable and assessment age as the explanatory variable.

RESULTS

Preterm-born children scored significantly lower compared with term-born children on simple (d = -0.45 [95% CI: -0.59 to -0.30]; P < .001) and on complex (d = -0.62 [95% CI: -0.82 to -0.43]; P < .001) language function tests, even in the absence of major disabilities and independent of social economic status. For complex language function (but not for simple language function), group differences between preterm- and term-born children increased significantly from 3 to 12 years of age (slope = -0.05; P = .03).

CONCLUSIONS

While growing up, preterm-born children have increasing difficulties with complex language function.

Effects of coexisting disorders on cognition and behavior in children with ADHD

OBJECTIVE

To determine whether the presence of coexisting disorders affects memory, visual-motor skills, and daily functioning in children with ADHD.

METHOD

Eighty-four boys and 18 girls (8 to 16 years old) participate in this study. Twenty children meet criteria for ADHD alone, 42 children for ADHD plus one other disorder, and 40 children for ADHD plus at least two other disorders (reading disability, developmental coordination disorder, oppositional defiant disorder, conduct disorder, anxiety, and depression). Children are assessed on memory and visual-motor skills. Parents complete measures of daily functioning.

RESULTS

No significant group differences emerge for age, socioeconomic status, or IQ. Poorer performance on tests of memory and visual-motor skills, more prevalent behavioral problems, and more impairment in everyday functioning are associated with a higher number of coexisting disorders in children with ADHD.

CONCLUSION

The presence of coexisting disorders has a significant influence on cognition and behavior of children with ADHD.

Kognitive Probleme bei Kindern und Jugendlichen

BACKGROUND

Patients with psychiatric or neurologic disease often suffer from neuropsychologic problems. The purpose of this study was to present a parental questionnaire (KOPKIJ) that assesses neuropsychologic problems in children and adolescents between 6 and 16 years of age.

METHODS

We tested theoretical analysis, standardization, and validation of the questionnaire in 352 healthy controls and 116 pediatric patients with epilepsy.

RESULTS

The objectivity of this standardized questionnaire can be considered high, and the reliability of the subscales is satisfying. Epileptic patients had higher scores than healthy controls, and the validation displayed reasonable connections with clinical factors and the results of neuropsychological evaluation.

CONCLUSION

The KOPKIJ allows an orientating appraisal clear picture of cognitive problems of children and adolescents at home and at school, simplifies anamnesis, and eases the planning of therapy strategies.

Identifying school performance problems in the pediatric office

The AAP has underscored the role and responsibility of pediatricians in screening their patients for developmental and learning problems and working with parents, schools, and other professionals to ensure that students with these problems receive appropriate educational and therapeutic interventions. We have proposed a model that is time-efficient and can be tailored to the level of interest and experience of the pediatrician. At a minimum, the primary care physician should elicit any parental concerns about school performance, affirm these, and direct the student and parents to appropriate resources in the community for further evaluation and intervention as necessary. Pediatricians who wish to understand more fully the nature and underpinnings of their patients' learning difficulties can formulate a preliminary diagnosis and develop a plan for treatment using a structured system of information gathering that can be combined with information about the child's medical status and supplemented by brief direct testing in the office setting. By following these approaches, primary care pediatricians can provide comprehensive care for their patients and their families in their medical home and also can derive considerable professional satisfaction.

Clinical importance of parent ratings of everyday cognitive abilities in children with learning and attention problems

This study addressed two issues: first, whether parental reports contribute information over and above a standardized psychometric assessment, and second, whether parental reports of everyday cognitive functioning might be useful in distinguishing between children with reading disabilities (RD), attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD), and combined ADHD + RD. Parent-reported information on 159 children with learning or attention problems was obtained using a questionnaire called the Parent Ratings of Everyday Cognitive and Academic Abilities (PRECAA). Psychometric information used for comparison included the Woodcock-Johnson Psychoeducational Battery-Revised, the Bruininks-Oseretsky Test of Motor Proficiency-Short Form, the Vocabulary and Block Design subtests of the Wechsler Intelligence Scale for Children, 3rd edition, and the Developmental Test of Visual-Motor Integration. The PRECAA was found to be sensitive to group differences between children with RD and children with ADHD and combined ADHD + RD. Its inclusion resulted in a significant increase in the number of children correctly classified compared to the use of psychometric measures alone. The PRECAA correctly classified more children (66%) than did the standard psychometric measures (50%). In fact, a very high percentage of children with ADHD (81%) were correctly classified using the PRECAA. These findings suggest that the PRECAA may be a useful aid to clinicians in the identification of children with learning and attention problems.