Effects of carbamazepine on plasma haloperidol levels

Drug-drug interactions between antiseizure medications and antipsychotic medications: a narrative review and expert opinion

INTRODUCTION

Antiseizure medications (ASMs) and antipsychotic drugs are frequently coadministered with the potential for drug-drug interactions. Interactions may either be pharmacokinetic or pharmacodynamic, resulting in a decrease or increase in efficacy and/or an increase or decrease in adverse effects.

AREAS COVERED

The clinical evidence for pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic interactions between ASMs and antipsychotics is reviewed based on the results of a literature search in MEDLINE conducted in April 2023.

EXPERT OPINION

There is now extensive published evidence for the clinical importance of interactions between ASMs and antipsychotics. Enzyme-inducing ASMs can decrease blood concentrations of many of the antipsychotics. There is also evidence that enzyme-inhibiting ASMs can increase antipsychotic blood concentrations. Similarly, there is limited evidence showing that antipsychotic drugs may affect the blood concentrations of ASMs through pharmacokinetic interactions. There is less available evidence for pharmacodynamic interactions, but these can also be important, as can displacement from protein binding. The lack of published evidence for an interaction should not be interpreted as meaning that the given interaction does not occur; the evidence is building continually. There is no substitute for careful patient monitoring and sound clinical judgment.

Pharmacokinetic Interactions Between Antiseizure and Psychiatric Medications

Antiseizure medications and drugs for psychiatric diseases are frequently used in combination. In this context, pharmacokinetic interactions between these drugs may occur. The vast majority of these interactions are primarily observed at a metabolic level and result from changes in the activity of the cytochrome P450 (CYP). Carbamazepine, phenytoin, and barbiturates induce the oxidative biotransformation and can consequently reduce the plasma concentrations of tricyclic antidepressants, many typical and atypical antipsychotics and some benzodiazepines. Newer antiseizure medications show a lower potential for clinically relevant interactions with drugs for psychiatric disease. The pharmacokinetics of many antiseizure medications is not influenced by antipsychotics and anxiolytics, while some newer antidepressants, namely fluoxetine, fluvoxamine and viloxazine, may inhibit CYP enzymes leading to increased serum concentrations of some antiseizure medications, including phenytoin and carbamazepine. Clinically relevant pharmacokinetic interactions may be anticipated by knowledge of CYP enzymes involved in the biotransformation of individual medications and of the influence of the specific comedication on the activity of these CYP enzymes. As a general rule, these interactions can be managed by careful evaluation of clinical response and, when indicated, individualized dosage adjustments guided by measurement of drugs serum concentrations, especially if pharmacokinetic interactions may cause any change in seizure control or signs of toxicity. Further studies are required to improve predictions of pharmacokinetic interactions between antiseizure medications and drugs for psychiatric diseases providing practical helps for clinicians in the clinical setting.

Pharmacokinetic drug interactions with oral haloperidol in adults: dose correction factors from a combined weighted analysis

INTRODUCTION

Pharmacokinetic (PK) drug-drug interactions (DDIs) of oral haloperidol, a first-generation antipsychotic, are systematically reviewed.

AREAS COVERED

After exclusions, the search for DDIs with oral haloperidol provided 47 articles as victim and 7 as perpetrator. Changes in mean haloperidol concentration-to-dose (C/D) ratios after weighting each study's size were used to calculate the effects of other drugs (inhibitors/inducers) on haloperidol. These changes of haloperidol C/D ratio were used to estimate dose-correction factors (<1 for inhibitors and >1 for inducers).

EXPERT OPINION

A box summarizes our recommendations for clinicians regarding our current knowledge of haloperidol PK DDIs, which will need to be updated as new information becomes available. Moderate to strong inducers (carbamazepine, phenobarbital, phenytoin, or rifampin) should be avoided since they required dose-correction factors of 2-5. Smoking appeared to be a weak inducer (dose-correction factor 1.2). Fluvoxamine, promethazine, and combinations of CYP3A4 and CYP2D6 inhibitors should be avoided. There are no long-term studies on fluoxetine to provide a dose correction factor. Limited information suggests that valproate may be an inhibitor (dose-correction factor 0.6). In most patients, haloperidol may not have clinically relevant effects as a perpetrator, but in vitro and clinical studies suggest it is a weak CYP2D6 inhibitor.

Carbamazepine for schizophrenia

BACKGROUND

Many people with schizophrenia do not achieve a satisfactory treatment response with just antipsychotic drug treatment and various adjunct medications are used to promote additional response. The antiepileptic carbamazepine is one such drug.

OBJECTIVES

To examine whether carbamazepine or oxcarbazepine alone is an effective treatment for schizophrenia and schizoaffective psychoses and whether carbamazepine or oxcarbazepine augmentation of neuroleptic medication is an effective treatment for the same illnesses.

SEARCH METHODS

For the original version we searched The Cochrane Schizophrenia Group's Register of Trials (December 2001), The Cochrane Library (Issue 3, 2001), MEDLINE (1966-2001), EMBASE (1980-2001), Biological Abstracts (1980-2001), PsycLIT (1886-2001) and PSYNDEX (1974-2001). For the most recent update we searched the Cochrane Schizophrenia Group's Register of Trials in July 2012. We also inspected references of all identified studies for further trials and contacted relevant pharmaceutical companies and authors for additional data.

SELECTION CRITERIA

We included all randomised controlled trials (RCTs) comparing carbamazepine or compounds of the carbamazepine family with placebo or no intervention, whether as sole treatment or as an adjunct to antipsychotic medication for the treatment of schizophrenia and/or schizoaffective psychoses.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

We extracted data independently. For homogenous dichotomous data we calculated fixed-effect, risk ratio (RR), with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) on an intention-to-treat basis. For continuous data, we calculated mean differences (MD). We assessed the risk of bias for included studies and created a 'Summary of findings' table using GRADE.

MAIN RESULTS

The updated search did not reveal any further studies that met our inclusion criteria. The number of included studies therefore remains at 10 with the number of participants randomised still 283.One study comparing carbamazepine with placebo as the sole treatment for schizophrenia was abandoned early due to high relapse rate with 26 out of 31 participants relapsing by three months. No effect of carbamazepine was evident with no difference in relapse between the two groups (1 RCT n = 31, RR 1.07 CI 0.78 to 1.45). Another study compared carbamazepine with antipsychotics as the sole treatment for schizophrenia. No differences in terms of mental state were found when comparing 50% reduction in Brief Psychiatric Rating Scale (BPRS) scores (1 RCT n = 38, RR 1.23 CI 0.78 to 1.92). A favourable effect for carbamazepine was found when more people who received the antipsychotic (perphenazine) had parkinsonism (1 RCT n = 38, RR 0.03 CI 0.00 to 0.043). Eight studies compared adjunctive carbamazepine versus adjunctive placebo, we were able use GRADE for quality of evidence for these results. Adding carbamazepine to antipsychotic treatment was as acceptable as adding placebo with no difference between the numbers leaving the study early from each group (8 RCTs n = 182, RR 0.47 CI 0.16 to 1.35, very low quality evidence). Carbamazepine augmentation was superior compared with antipsychotics alone in terms of overall global improvement, but participant numbers were low (2 RCTs n = 38, RR 0.57 CI 0.37 to 0.88). There were no differences for the mental state outcome of 50% reduction in BPRS scores (6 RCTs n = 147, RR 0.86 CI 0.67 to 1.12, low quality evidence). Less people in the carbamazepine augmentation group had movement disorders than those taking haloperidol alone (1 RCT n = 20, RR 0.38 CI 0.14 to 1.02). No data were available for the effects of carbamazepine on subgroups of people with schizophrenia and aggressive behaviour, negative symptoms or EEG abnormalities or with schizoaffective disorder.

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

Based on currently available randomised trial-derived evidence, carbamazepine cannot be recommended for routine clinical use for treatment or augmentation of antipsychotic treatment of schizophrenia. At present large, simple well-designed and reported trials are justified - especially if focusing on people with violent episodes and people with schizoaffective disorders or those with both schizophrenia and EEG abnormalities.

Effect of carbamazepine on agitation and emotional lability associated with severe dementia

In an open prospective study, the stabilizing effects of carbamazepine on agitation, impulsivity and affective lability were investigated in 15 severely demented patients, who had failed to respond to prior neuroleptic medication. Because of leukopenia and allergic reactions in two subjects, carbamazepine treatment was discontinued. In nine patients a clinically relevant improvement was observed.

Human UDP-glucuronosyltransferase isoforms involved in haloperidol glucuronidation and quantitative estimation of their contribution

A major metabolic pathway of haloperidol is glucuronidation catalyzed by UDP-glucuronosyltransferase (UGT). In this study, we found that two glucuronides were formed by the incubation of haloperidol with human liver microsomes (HLM) and presumed that the major and minor metabolites (>10-fold difference) were O- and N-glucuronide, respectively. The haloperidol N-glucuronidation was catalyzed solely by UGT1A4, whereas the haloperidol O-glucuronidation was catalyzed by UGT1A4, UGT1A9, and UGT2B7. The kinetics of the haloperidol O-glucuronidation in HLM was monophasic with K(m) and V(max) values of 85 μM and 3.2 nmol · min⁻¹ · mg⁻¹, respectively. From the kinetic parameters of the recombinant UGT1A4 (K(m) = 64 μM, V(max) = 0.6 nmol · min⁻¹ · mg⁻¹), UGT1A9 (K(m) = 174 μM, V(max) = 2.3 nmol · min⁻¹ · mg⁻¹), and UGT2B7 (K(m) = 45 μM, V(max) = 1.0 nmol · min⁻¹ · mg⁻¹), we could not estimate which isoform largely contributes to the reaction. Because the haloperidol O-glucuronidation in a panel of 17 HLM was significantly correlated (r = 0.732, p < 0.01) with zidovudine O-glucuronidation, a probe activity of UGT2B7, and the activity in the pooled HLM was prominently inhibited (58% of control) by gemfibrozil, an inhibitor of UGT2B7, we surmised that the reaction would mainly be catalyzed by UGT2B7. We could successfully estimate, using the concept of the relative activity factor, that the contributions of UGT1A4, UGT1A9, and UGT2B7 in HLM were approximately 10, 20, and 70%, respectively. The present study provides new insight into haloperidol glucuronidation, concerning the causes of interindividual differences in the efficacy and adverse reactions or drug-drug interactions.

Role of Haloperidol in Palliative Medicine

Haloperidol is a butyrophenone neuroleptic agent characterized as a high-affinity dopamine antagonist, originally used for the treatment of schizophrenia. Awareness of the role dopamine plays in many symptoms in palliative care, such as nausea, vomiting, and delirium, has led to the use of dopamine antagonists such as haloperidol for the treatment of these symptoms in the palliative care setting. Listed as 1 of the 25 important drugs in palliative care, haloperidol can be administered by multiple routes and can be given without dose alteration in the setting of both renal and hepatic insufficiency. Haloperidol is extensively metabolized in the liver, with CYP3A4 the chief cytochrome oxidase responsible for metabolism. This article will review the pharmacology, pharmacokinetics, and current uses of haloperidol in palliative medicine. There will be an examination of the evidence base for the use of haloperidol in palliative medicine.

The pharmacological importance of cytochrome CYP3A4 in the palliation of symptoms: review and recommendations for avoiding adverse drug interactions

BACKGROUND

Adverse drug interactions are major causes of morbidity, hospitalizations, and mortality. The greatest risk of drug interactions occurs through in the cytochrome system. CYP3A4, the most prevalent cytochrome, accounts for 30-50% of drugs metabolized through type I enzymes.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Palliative patients received medications for symptoms and co-morbidities, many of which are substrate, inhibitors, or promoters of CYP3A4 activity and expression. A literature review on CYP3A4 was performed pertinent to palliative medicine.

DISCUSSION

In this state of the art review, we discuss the CYP3A4 genetics, and kinetics and common medications, which are substrates or inhibitor/promoters of CYP3A4.

CONCLUSION

We made some recommendations for drug choices to avoid clinically important drug interaction.

Interactions between Antiepileptic and Antipsychotic Drugs

Antiepileptic and antipsychotic drugs are often prescribed together. Interactions between the drugs may affect both efficacy and toxicity. This is a review of human clinical data on the interactions between the antiepileptic drugs carbamazepine, valproic acid (sodium valproate), vigabatrin, lamotrigine, gabapentin, topiramate, tiagabine, oxcarbazepine, levetiracetam, pregabalin, felbamate, zonisamide, phenobarbital and phenytoin with the antipsychotic drugs risperidone, olanzapine, quetiapine, clozapine, amisulpride, sulpiride, ziprasidone, aripiprazole, haloperidol and chlorpromazine; the limited information on interactions between antiepileptic drugs and zuclopenthixol, periciazine, fluphenazine, flupenthixol and pimozide is also presented. Many of the interactions depend on the induction or inhibition of the cytochrome P450 isoenzymes, but other important mechanisms involve the uridine diphosphate glucuronosyltransferase isoenzymes and protein binding. There is some evidence for the following effects. Carbamazepine decreases the plasma concentrations of both risperidone and its active metabolite. It also decreases concentrations of olanzapine, clozapine, ziprasidone, haloperidol, zuclopenthixol, flupenthixol and probably chlorpromazine and fluphenazine. Quetiapine increases the ratio of carbamazepine epoxide to carbamazepine and this may lead to toxicity. The data on valproic acid are conflicting; it may either increase or decrease clozapine concentrations, and it appears to decrease aripiprazole concentrations. Chlorpromazine possibly increases valproic acid concentrations. Lamotrigine possibly increases clozapine concentrations. Phenobarbital decreases clozapine, haloperidol and chlorpromazine concentrations. Phenytoin decreases quetiapine, clozapine, haloperidol and possibly chlorpromazine concentrations. There are major gaps in the data. In many cases there are no published clinical data on interactions that would be predicted on theoretical grounds.

Clonazepam and lorazepam in acute mania: a Bayesian meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Clonazepam and lorazepam are used in the treatment of acute mania but trial results are conflicting.

METHODS

Studies were identified by searching MEDLINE and EMBASE for lorazepam or clonazepam in acute mania between 1966 and 2000. Seven randomized controlled trials were found comparing clonazepam or lorazepam to placebo, haloperidol or lithium in acute mania. Data on 206 patients were analyzed.

RESULTS

The heterogeneity of trial designs and the use of different comparators necessitated a Bayesian hierarchical meta-analysis with three models: (a) random trial effect and fixed treatment effects, (b) random trial and treatment effects, (c) random trial and treatment effects with trial variance unknown. With all models, clonazepam decreased psychopathology scores statistically significantly with the following standardized responses: model (a): 1.26 (95% predictive interval (PI) 0.33 to 2.28), model (b): 1.21 (95% PI 0.08 to 2.53), model (c): 1.41 (95% PI 0.12 to 2.67). Lorazepam did not yield statistically significant standardized responses for any of the three models: model (a): 0.79 (95% PI -0.29 to 1.89), model (b): 0.77 (95% PI -0.57 to 2.24) and model (c): 0.74 (-0.82 to 2.20). Haloperidol yielded statistically significant standardized responses in the three models but lithium effect was statistically significant only in model (a). Safety data were in line with the usual safety profile of benzodiazepines.

LIMITATIONS

Trial designs were heterogenous and patient number was limited.

CONCLUSIONS

This meta-analysis suggests that clonazepam is efficient and safe in the treatment of acute mania, but the results remain inconclusive for lorazepam.

Les traitements adjuvants au cours de l’épisode maniaque

When treating patients with manic states, the physician has to deal with at least two main Issues. First, the therapeutic decision has to be rapid because of the unpredictability of its immediate course. This concerns often results in polypharmacy with adjunct treatments. However, the therapeutic choice has to be cautious since part of the treatment will be maintained for prophylaxis. According to recent guidelines, the use of monotherapy with mood stabilisers during acute manic states concerns only few patients with mostly hypomania to moderate mania. Up to date, antipsychotics and benzodiazepines are considered as adjunct treatment in mania with psychotic symptoms or hostility. However, survey studies show that antipsychotics are widely used as adjunct treatments to mood stabilisers, indeed beyond the indications held by the guidelines. Our objective was to describe the clinical situations justifying the addition of an adjunct treatment during acute mania and to clear up from published data, the advantages and the inconveniences of combining antipsychotics and/or benzodiazepines with a mood stabilisers in order to define differentiated indications. Mania associated with either agitation, sleep disturbances or psychotic symptoms requires most of the time to combine mood stabiliser and respectively, sedative and/or anxiolytic, hypnotic or anti-psychotic treatments. Patients suffering from mania associated with other disorders need specific treatment adjustment and combination related to their medical condition. Adjunctive conventional antipsychotic remains widely used in first intention treatment. The conventional antipsychotic is often prescribed alone in the first weeks prior to the association with a mood stabiliser. Nevertheless there are controversies in the literature about their efficiency and their delay of action with regard to other treatments. When the conventional antipsychotic is a part of their initial treatment, manic patients remain taking them when discharged from hospital and are still taking them after 6 Months in a great percentage of the cases. The adverse events with conventional antipsychotic are numerous and severe enough in bipolar patients to restrict their use in first intention mainly to psychotic mania. Moreover, there are evidences for higher sensitivity to adverse effects of the conventional antipsychotics in manic patients. When agitation in acute mania requires an adjunct to mood stabiliser, the conventional antipsychotic treatment could be use for over-excitation without catatonic features and with particular care with the risk of akathisia. Long term effects of conventional antipsychotics, especially on depressive recurrences, should argue to stop them as soon as possible. Since the safety of adjunctive new antipsychotics with mood stabilisers seems until now acceptable, its indication should be limited to acute psychotic manias. Adjunctive benzodiazepine, should be evaluated in the various types of mania with specific concerns with comorbidity frequently met in consultation-liaison psychiatry. Benzodiazepines plus mood stabilisers may be the treatment of choice for the manias in which anxious state, catatonic symptoms or sleeplessness.

Pharmacokinetic Factors in the Adverse Cardiovascular Effects of Antipsychotic Drugs

Antipsychotics may cause serious adverse cardiovascular effects, including prolonged QT interval and sudden death. This review considers antipsychotic-induced cardiovascular events from three perspectives: high-risk drugs, high-risk individuals and high-risk drug interactions. Pharmacokinetic drug interactions involving the cytochrome P450 (CYP) enzymatic pathway and pharmacodynamic interactions leading to direct cardiotoxic effects are discussed. Original reports on antipsychotic-induced drug interactions are reviewed, with consideration of management guidelines. The literature was reviewed from 1 January 1966 to 1 February 2002. The literature search revealed only 12 original articles published on antipsychotic drug interactions leading to cardiovascular adverse events. Only 4 of the 12 reports were prospective studies; the remainder were either retrospective or anecdotal.Although poor study designs preclude a definitive statement, it appears that pharmacokinetic interactions primarily involved the CYP2D6 and CYP3A4 enzymatic pathways. Those involving the CYP2D6 isozyme included interactions with tricyclic antidepressants, selective serotonergic reuptake inhibitors and beta-blockers. Among these drug interactions, tricyclic antidepressants were most likely to reach clinical significance because of their limited therapeutic index. Drug interactions related to the CYP3A4 pathway were generally less severe, and involved high-potency antipsychotics coadministered with inhibitors such as clarithromycin. Strategies are discussed for the management of adverse cardiovascular events related to antipsychotic drug interactions, including the use of an algorithm. Large, randomised, placebo-controlled studies with strict inclusion criteria are needed to determine the role that antipsychotics play in QT prolongation and sudden death.

Significant dose effect of carbamazepine on reduction of steady-state plasma concentration of haloperidol in schizophrenic patients

A reduction in haloperidol concentration induced by carbamazepine coadministration has been consistently reported. However, the degree of this reduction is very different among individuals treated with various doses of carbamazepine. Thus, we investigated dose effect of carbamazepine on the steady-state plasma concentration of haloperidol. Eleven excited schizophrenic inpatients, despite receiving haloperidol 12 mg/d, were treated with incremental doses of carbamazepine for 6 weeks (100, 300, 600 mg/d for 2 weeks each). Plasma drug concentrations were monitored together with clinical assessments before and after each phase of the 3 carbamazepine doses. Mean haloperidol concentrations during coadministration of carbamazepine 100, 300, and 600 mg/d were 75%, 39%, and 15%, respectively, of corresponding variables before carbamazepine coadministration. Negative linear correlations were observed between dose or plasma concentration of carbamazepine and the degree of reduction in haloperidol concentration. Mean carbamazepine dose and plasma carbamazepine concentrations at 50% reduction of haloperidol concentration were 240 mg/d and 3.5 microg/mL, respectively. Scores in total and excitement symptoms were significantly reduced after carbamazepine coadministration, whereas no changes were observed in other clinical symptoms or any of the subgroup side effects. Therefore, this study indicates that carbamazepine decreases plasma haloperidol concentration in a dose-dependent or concentration-dependent manner, and that reduction in haloperidol concentration is apparent even at subtherapeutic dose of carbamazepine.

Toxicological interactions involving psychiatric drugs and alcohol: an update

This review focuses on the toxicological interactions between alcohol (ethanol) and psychiatric drugs (antidepressants and antipsychotics), including those leading to fatal poisoning. Acute or chronic ingestion of alcohol when combined with psychiatric drugs may lead to several clinically significant toxicological interactions. The metabolism of these drugs is generally but not always delayed by acute alcohol ingestion. Drugs undergoing metabolism may also show increased metabolic clearance with chronic alcohol ingestion. Therefore, the net effect may be influenced by internal (e.g. disease, age, gender), external (e.g. environment, diet) and pharmacokinetic (e.g. dose, timing of ingestion, gastrointestinal absorption, distribution and elimination) factors. Cases of fatal poisoning involving coadministration of psychiatric drugs, alcohol and other drugs prompted this review.

Interindividual variation of serum haloperidol concentrations in Japanese patients--clinical considerations on steady-state serum level-dose ratios

OBJECTIVE

Marked interpatient variability in haloperidol (HAL) level-dose (L/D) ratios makes it difficult to use the administered dose for predicting serum concentrations.

OBJECTIVE

To investigate the effect of dose, age, total body weight and co-medication on steady-state HAL L/D ratios.

METHOD

Retrospective analysis of dose and HAL blood level data from 168 patients.

RESULTS

The HAL L/D ratio decreased curvilinearly with increasing daily dose of HAL. The patients treated with concomitant antiparkinsonian drugs showed a mean HAL L/D ratio that was 24.9% higher than those without antiparkinsonian drugs. The patients treated with concomitant antiepileptic drugs showed a mean HAL L/D ratio that was 27.2% lower than those without antiepileptic drugs. The mean HAL L/D ratio of patients treated with concomitant CYP2D6 substrates was not significantly different from those without CYP2D6 substrates.

CONCLUSION

There is a wide interindividual variability in blood levels of HAL in patients given the same dose. Routine monitoring of HAL serum level is useful, especially in patients who require associated antiepileptic and/or antiparkinsonian medication.

Population pharmacokinetics of haloperidol using routine clinical pharmacokinetic data in Japanese patients

OBJECTIVE

To clarify the observed variability of haloperidol disposition in patients with psychiatric disorders.

DESIGN

Retrospective population pharmacokinetic study.

PARTICIPANTS

218 Japanese patients aged 16 to 82 years who provided 391 serum haloperidol concentrations.

METHODS

Routine clinical pharmacokinetic data gathered from patients receiving haloperidol were analysed to estimate population pharmacokinetic parameters with the nonlinear mixed effects model (NONMEM) computer program.

RESULTS

The final pharmacokinetic model was CL = 42.4 * (TBW/60)(0.655) * 0.814(AGE> or = 55) * (DOSE/200)(0.236) * 1.32(ANTIEP) and Vd = 34.4 * TBW * 0.336( AGE> or = 65), where CL is total body clearance (L/h), Vd is apparent volume of distribution (L), TBW is total bodyweight (kg), DOSE is daily dosage (microg/kg/day), ANTIEP = 1 for concomitant administration of antiepileptic drugs (phenobarbital, phenytoin or carbamazepine) and 0 otherwise, AGE > or = 55 = 1 for patient aged 55 years or over and 0 otherwise, and AGE > or = 65 = 1 for patient aged 65 years or over and 0 otherwise. Concomitant administration of haloperidol and antiepileptic drugs resulted in a 32% increase in haloperidol clearance. Patients aged 55 years or over showed an 18.6% reduction in clearance, and elderly patients aged 65 years or over showed a 66.4% reduction in apparent volume of distribution. Inclusion of terms for the concomitant administration of haloperidol and antiparkinsonian drugs (amantadine, bromocriptine, biperiden, trihexyphenidyl or mazaticol) or cytochrome P450 (CYP) 2D6 substrates (levomepromazine, perphenazine, thioridazine, amitriptyline or clomipramine) did not significantly improve the estimate of haloperidol clearance.

CONCLUSION

Application of the findings in this study to patient care may permit selection of an appropriate initial maintenance dosage to achieve target haloperidol serum concentrations, thus enabling the clinician to achieve the desired therapeutic effect.

Clinical significance of pharmacokinetic interactions between antiepileptic and psychotropic drugs

As antiepileptic drugs (AEDs) and psychotropic agents are increasingly used in combination, the possibility of pharmacokinetic interactions between these compounds is relatively common. Most pharmacokinetic interactions between AEDs and psychoactive drugs occur at a metabolic level, and usually involve changes in the activity of the cytochrome P450 mixed-function oxidases (CYP) involved in their biotransformation. As a consequence of CYP inhibition or induction, plasma concentrations of a given drug may reach toxic or subtherapeutic levels, and dosage adjustments may be required to avoid adverse effects or clinical failure. Enzyme-inducing AEDs, such as carbamazepine (CBZ), phenytoin (PHT), and barbiturates, stimulate the oxidative biotransformation of many concurrently prescribed psychotropics. In particular, these AEDs may decrease the plasma concentrations of tricyclic antidepressants, many antipsychotics, including traditional compounds, i.e., haloperidol and chlorpromazine, and newer agents, i.e., clozapine, risperidone, olanzapine, quetiapine, and ziprasidone, and some benzodiazepines. Conversely, new AEDs appear to have a lower potential for interactions with all psychotropic drugs. While antipsychotics and anxiolytics do not significantly influence the pharmacokinetics of most AEDs, some newer antidepressants, such as viloxazine, fluoxetine, and fluvoxamine, may lead to higher serum levels of some AEDs, namely CBZ and PHT, through inhibition of CYP enzymes. No significant pharmacokinetic interactions have been documented between AEDs and lithium. Information about CYP enzymes responsible for the biotransformation of individual agents and about the effects of these compounds on the activity of specific CYP enzymes may help in predicting and avoiding clinically significant interactions. Apart from careful clinical observation, serum level monitoring of AEDs and psychotropic drugs can be useful in determining the need for dosage adjustments, especially if there is any change in seizure control, or possible toxicity.

Treatment of interictal psychiatric disorder in epilepsy. II. Chronic psychosis

BACKGROUND

Interictal psychosis is a serious comorbid condition in epilepsy patients that would benefit from treatment with psychotropic medication.

OBJECTIVE

This paper gives an overview of the pathophysiology, symptomatology and treatment of the schizophrenia-like psychosis of epilepsy. Use of the term 'interictal chronic psychosis' is suggested, to conform to current DSM-IV classification of schizophrenia.

METHODS

Literature review supplemented by clinical experience. There is a lack of randomized control trials (RCTs) concerning effectiveness and side-effects of neuroleptics in epilepsy patients.

RESULTS

Hypotheses concerning the pathophysiology of the interictal chronic psychosis are discussed. The concept of forced normalization and alternative psychosis is based on case descriptions, and was not substantiated by systematic research. The kindling hypothesis seems promising, but was never confirmed in humans. A third theory, supported by some studies, suggests that inhibitory cerebral mechanisms enhance psychotic symptoms in epilepsy patients. Treatment strategies are based on case studies and open studies by lack of RCTs. Treatment should consider the optimalization of the dosage of antiepileptics in combination with one or two antidepressants, mood stabilizers and/or atypical neuroleptics. Surgery plays no significant role in the treatment of treatment-refractive epilepsy with interictal chronic psychotic symptoms.

CONCLUSION

There is a prominent role of antidepressant or double antidepressant treatment strategies in patients with epilepsy and interictal chronic psychosis compared with treatment guidelines of chronic psychotic patients in general psychiatry.

The comorbidity of bipolar and anxiety disorders: prevalence, psychobiology, and treatment issues

BACKGROUND

Although symptoms of anxiety as well as anxiety disorders commonly occur in patients with bipolar disorder, the pathophysiologic, theoretical, and clinical significance of their co-occurrence has not been well studied.

METHODS

The epidemiological and clinical studies that have assessed the overlap of bipolar and anxiety disorders are reviewed, with focus on panic disorder and obsessive-compulsive disorder (OCD), and to a lesser extent, social phobia and post-traumatic stress disorder. Potential neural mechanism and treatment response data are also reviewed.

RESULTS

A growing number of epidemiological studies have found that bipolar disorder significantly co-occurs with anxiety disorders at rates that are higher than those in the general population. Clinical studies have also demonstrated high comorbidity between bipolar disorder and panic disorder, OCD, social phobia, and post-traumatic stress disorder. Psychobiological mechanisms that may account for these high comorbidity rates likely involve a complicated interplay among various neurotransmitter systems, particularly norepinephrine, dopamine, gamma-aminobutyric acid (GABA), and serotonin. The second-messenger system constituent, inositol, may also be involved. Little controlled data are available regarding the treatment of bipolar disorder complicated by an anxiety disorder. However, adequate mood stabilization should be achieved before antidepressants are used to treat residual anxiety symptoms so as to minimize antidepressant-induced mania or cycling. Moreover, preliminary data suggesting that certain antimanic agents may have anxiolytic properties (e.g. valproate and possibly antipsychotics), and that some anxiolytics may not induce mania (e.g. gabapentin and benzodiazepines other than alprazolam) indicate that these agents may be particularly useful for anxious bipolar patients.

CONCLUSIONS

Comorbid anxiety symptoms and disorders must be considered when diagnosing and treating patients with bipolar disorder. Conversely, patients presenting with anxiety disorders must be assessed for comorbid mood disorders, including bipolar disorder. Pathophysiological, theoretical, and clinical implications of the overlap of bipolar and anxiety disorders are discussed.

Therapeutic drug monitoring databases for postmarketing surveillance of drug-drug interactions

Drug-drug interactions can be associated with patient morbidity due to either increased toxicity or a potentially ineffective concentration. Because interactions cannot always be anticipated during drug development and actual patients receiving a drug for therapeutic use often differ from those included in clinical trials, postmarketing surveillance is essential. Therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM) databases offer a unique opportunity in this respect. Prerequisites for TDM databases to provide valid information in a pharmacoepidemiological perspective include the following: precise description of exposure to the potentially interacting drugs; measurement of parent compound and active metabolites through accurate and precise analytical techniques; documentation of relevant patient characteristics that may act as confounding factors (e.g. gender, age, smoking habits); repeated assessments over time if possible; and sound pharmacokinetic framework for data selection, analysis and interpretation. The contribution of TDM to the documentation of drug-drug interactions takes advantage of different possible study designs, discussed on the basis of recently published studies. The single case report plays an important role as an alert signal. It is illustrated for a patient on long-term treatment, who displayed an unexpectedly high clozapine concentration after the introduction of ciprofloxacin comedication. The prospective on and off comedication panel study shows advantages in terms of carefully selected inclusion criteria and control of treatment modalities. A study of the thioridazine-fluvoxamine interaction is presented, with patients followed on thioridazine monotherapy, after introduction of fluvoxamine and after its discontinuation. The main advantage of the retrospective large-scale TDM database screen is representativeness of patients actually treated, whereas drawbacks are related to quality of data and suitability for valid interpretation. Such an approach is illustrated by a review of data collected over 10 years of routine TDM that allowed documenting induction of nortriptyline metabolism by carbamazepine and inhibition by several phenothiazines. Finally, population pharmacokinetics is well suited to observational data collected for TDM purpose, provided quality is ascertained. Focus is placed on interindividual variability and relationship between pharmacokinetic parameters and patient characteristics, including comedication. The population approach is discussed with respect to a study that documented a 32% increase of haloperidol clearance associated with anticonvulsant comedication, in addition to effects of age and bodyweight. Among factors to consider for improved effectiveness in the use of TDM databases for postmarketing surveillance of drug-drug interactions, integration of efficacy and safety data in future studies and communication of expert recommendations to prescribing physicians are essential.

The violent patient

Encounters with violent behavior are an inevitable part of working in emergency departments. By adoption of a cohesive, multidisciplinary approach to behavioral decompensation, as is done in preparation for airway compromise, the risk for injury to patients and staff is minimized. As with airway compromise, anticipation of and preparation for deterioration can avoid the necessity of the most invasive measures and can ensure a calm, positive outcome. With the appropriate knowledge, teamwork, and skills, even patients requiring the most intensive intervention can be treated safely and professionally.

Interactions between anticonvulsant and psychoactive drugs

This review considers the relevance of pharmacokinetic interactions between antiepileptic drugs (AEDs) and psychoactive drugs in the treatment of mood disorders in patients with epilepsy. The determination of plasma levels of some of these drugs (mainly the AEDs) has enabled clinicians to evaluate the kinetic modifications during the course of such combined therapies and to adjusting the dosages in cases of subtherapeutic or toxic levels. In general, phenobarbital, phenytoin, and carbamazepine stimulate the catabolic degradation of tricyclic antidepressants (TCAs), and TCAs have an inhibitory effect on the elimination of AEDs. The newer antidepressants that selectively inhibit the reuptake of serotonin (SSRIs), although in different fashions for the different substances (fluoxetine, fluvoxamine, paroxetine) may cause an increase of plasma AED levels through inhibition of the isoenzyme P450 2D6. Similarly, antipsychotics (APs) are more rapidly metabolized when AEDs are co-administered, whereas AED metabolism is scarcely influenced by AP. Finally, plasma levels of tranquilizers are lowered by AED co-therapy. As the concomitant administration of AED and psychoactive drugs becomes increasingly used for treatment of mood disorders in patients with or without epilepsy, therapeutic drug monitoring may be useful in designing correct and rational therapy.

Pharmacokinetics of haloperidol: an update

Haloperidol is commonly used in the therapy of patients with acute and chronic schizophrenia. The enzymes involved in the biotransformation of haloperidol include cytochrome P450 (CYP), carbonyl reductase and uridine diphosphoglucose glucuronosyltransferase. The greatest proportion of the intrinsic hepatic clearance of haloperidol is by glucuronidation, followed by the reduction of haloperidol to reduced haloperidol and by CYP-mediated oxidation. In studies of CYP-mediated disposition in vitro, CYP3A4 appears to be the major isoform responsible for the metabolism of haloperidol in humans. The intrinsic clearances of the back-oxidation of reduced haloperidol to the parent compound, oxidative N-dealkylation and pyridinium formation are of the same order of magnitude, suggesting that the same enzyme system is responsible for the 3 reactions. Large variation in the catalytic activity was observed in the CYP-mediated reactions, whereas there appeared to be only small variations in the glucuronidation and carbonyl reduction pathways. Haloperidol is a substrate of CYP3A4 and an inhibitor, as well as a stimulator, of CYP2D6. Reduced haloperidol is also a substrate of CYP3A4 and inhibitor of CYP2D6. Pharmacokinetic interactions occur between haloperidol and various drugs given concomitantly, for example, carbamazepine, phenytoin, phenobarbital, fluoxetine, fluvoxamine, nefazodone, venlafaxine, buspirone, alprazolam, rifampicin (rifampin), quinidine and carteolol. Overall, drug interaction studies have suggested that CYP3A4 is involved in the biotransformation of haloperidol in humans. Interactions of haloperidol with most drugs lead to only small changes in plasma haloperidol concentrations, suggesting that the interactions have little clinical significance. On the other hand, the coadministration of carbamazepine, phenytoin, phenobarbital, rifampicin or quinidine affects the pharmacokinetics of haloperidol to an extent that alterations in clinical consequences would be expected. In vivo pharmacogenetic studies have indicated that the metabolism and disposition of haloperidol may be regulated by genetically determined polymorphic CYP2D6 activity. However, these findings appear to contradict those from studies in vitro with human liver microsomes and from studies of drug interactions in vivo. Interethnic and pharmacogenetic differences in haloperidol metabolism may explain these observations.

Metabolism, pharmacogenetics, and metabolic drug-drug interactions of antipsychotic drugs

1. Antipsychotic drugs are extensively metabolised by cytochrome P450 (CYP) enzymes. 2. Dispositions of a number of antipsychotic drugs have been shown to cosegregate with polymorphism of CYP2D6. 3. Metabolic drug-drug interactions have frequently been observed when antipsychotics are coadministered with other drugs. 4. Many antipsychotic drugs are converted to active metabolites which can contribute to the therapeutic or side effects of the parent drug. 5. Information concerning the individual CYP isoenzymes involved in the metabolism of antipsychotic drugs is important for the safe clinical use of this group of drugs.

Atypical antipsychotics in the treatment of the persistently aggressive psychotic patient: methodological concerns

Aggressive behavior of psychotic patients impacts all aspects of their clinical care. Better treatments to address this problem are needed, and atypical antipsychotics, such as clozapine, risperidone, and perhaps quetiapine, have shown promise. However, studying the psychopharmacology of aggression is difficult because of the many methodological problems that arise in the design of appropriate clinical trials. These include imprecise definitions of aggression, the difficulty of measuring outcome because of the relative rarity of aggressive events, bias in the selection of patients for study, inadequate and inappropriate control groups, and inattention to comorbidities and concomitant medications in analyzing results. Since the usual outcome measure is the aggressive event rate, a large sample size and lengthy baseline and trial periods are required when this rate is low. Furthermore, formidable practical and ethical obstacles interfere with the many sound techniques (e.g. randomization) used in typical designs of psychopharmacological clinical trials. Current research methods should be modified and new ones developed in order to progress in assessing the antiaggressive effects of treatments.

Interindividual variation of plasma haloperidol concentrations and the impact of concomitant medications: the analysis of therapeutic drug monitoring data

We analyzed therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM) data from 231 schizophrenic inpatients (137 men, 94 women) and investigated interindividual differences of plasma haloperidol (HAL) concentrations and drug/drug interactions between HAL and various concomitant drugs. Plasma HAL concentrations were determined by an enzyme immunoassay (EIA) method. Plasma HAL concentrations per daily dose of HAL per body weight (HAL C/D ratio) demonstrated an approximately 11-fold interindividual variation. The patient subjects who received carbamazepine (CBZ) concomitantly had a mean HAL C/D ratio that was 37% lower than that of the patient subjects without CBZ. The patient subjects treated with concomitant phenobarbital (PB) also showed a mean HAL C/D ratio that was 22% lower than those without PB. We concluded that careful evaluation of HAL TDM data and consideration of the impact of concomitant medication such as CBZ or PB that might influence the metabolism of HAL is necessary in daily clinical settings to avoid insufficient clinical response because of lowered concentrations of HAL or adverse effects because of high concentrations of HAL.

The relationship between serum concentration and therapeutic effect of haloperidol in patients with acute schizophrenia

Haloperidol is the most commonly used antipsychotic drug in the therapy of acute schizophrenia. Clinicians have been using therapeutic drug monitoring in an attempt to improve clinical application of this drug. The scale of interest in this area is emphasised by the large number of studies (about 50) concerning the serum concentration-therapeutic effect relationship (SCTER) of haloperidol, including 35 studies on patients with acute schizophrenia. However, conflicting results concerning the existence and position of a therapeutic window have emerged. This article aims to provide a comprehensive review of the study design of studies in patients with acute schizophrenia before the study data are used for decision-making. For this purpose, a reproducible system for the evaluation of studies in this special area, a so-called total study score (TSS), was developed on an empirical basis. Thus, insufficient study design was found to be a reason for negative results. On the other hand, in spite of a great variability, the majority of studies with good design provided evidence for a significant SCTER: a bisigmoidal dependence of clinical effect on haloperidol serum concentration. The therapeutic effects of haloperidol increase at low concentrations, and the concentration has a maximum effect at about 10 micrograms/L and again decreasing at higher concentrations. The data of 552 patients also fit to this model in a single scatter plot (pseudo-r2 = 0.076, p < 0.001). The position of the therapeutic window was determined at about 5.6 to 16.9 micrograms/L. Patients treated with serum concentrations within this optimal range had a significantly better response compared with outside this range (p < 0.001, Student t-test). Therefore, a quantitative synthesis of all available data by means of effect-size analysis provides a mean effect-size (g) = 0.499 +/- 0.182 (standard deviation) for the comparison of haloperidol-treatment with serum concentrations within versus outside the therapeutic window. Thus, because of this moderate positive effect, serum concentration assay of haloperidol is recommended for patients with acute schizophrenia in a therapeutic drug monitoring programme. The modalities of haloperidol therapeutic drug monitoring in clinical practice are discussed, e.g. patient selection, method and time for serum concentration measurement, influence of premedication and comedication, interpretation of results and dose adjustment. Clinical investigations into this subject should focus on covariates which are responsible for the variability of the SCTER. Serum concentration assay is advised for investigations of nonresponse to exclude patients with pseudo-drug resistance.

Ethnicity and antipsychotic response

OBJECTIVE

To review the data generated by studies examining interethnic/racial differences in response to antipsychotics.

DATA SOURCES

A MEDLINE search (1966-1996) identified all articles examining differences in antipsychotic response among Caucasians, Asians, Hispanics, and African-Americans, as well as articles evaluating postulated mechanisms for these differences.

STUDY SELECTION

All abstracts, studies, and review articles were evaluated.

DATA SYNTHESIS

Ethnic/racial differences in response to antipsychotic medications have been reported and may be due to genetics, kinetic variations, dietary or environmental factors, or variations in the prescribing practices of clinicians. Studies suggest that Asians may respond to lower doses of antipsychotics due to pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic differences. Research relevant to African-Americans is limited, but some studies suggest that differences in this group may be due to clinician biases and prescribing practices, rather than to pharmacokinetic or pharmacodynamic variability.

CONCLUSIONS

Future research directed at validating the hypotheses that different ethnic/racial groups show variations in response to antipsychotics should focus on homogeneous ethnic groups, use recent advances in pharmacogenetic testing, and control for such variables as observer bias, gender, disease chronicity, dietary and environmental factors, and exposure to enzyme-inducing and -inhibiting agents. Clinicians should be aware that potential interethnic/racial differences in pharmacodynamics and pharmacokinetics may exist that can alter response to antipsychotics.

Haloperidol, lorazepam, or both for psychotic agitation? A multicenter, prospective, double-blind, emergency department study

Rapid tranquilization is a routinely practiced method of calming agitated psychotic patients by use of neuroleptics, benzodiazepines, or both in combination. Although several studies have examined the efficacy of the three approaches, none have compared these treatments in a prospective, randomized, double-blind, multicenter trial. Ninety-eight psychotic, agitated, and aggressive patients (73 men and 25 women) were prospectively enrolled during an 18-month period in emergency departments in five university or general hospitals. Patients were randomly assigned to receive intramuscular injections of lorazepam (2 mg), haloperidol (5 mg), or both in combination. Patients in each treatment group received 1 to 6 injections of the same study drug within 12 hours, based on clinical need. They were evaluated hourly after the first injection until at least 12 hours after the last. Efficacy was assessed on the Agitated Behavior Scale (ABS), a modified Brief Psychiatric Rating Scale (MBPRS), Clinical Global impressions (CGI) scale, and an Alertness Scale. Effective symptom reduction was achieved in each treatment group with significant (P < .01) mean decreases from baseline at every hourly ABS evaluation. Significant (P < .05) mean differences on the ABS (hour 1) and MBPRS (hours 2 and 3) suggest that tranquilization was most rapid in patients receiving the combination treatment. Study event incidence (side effects) did not differ significantly between treatment groups, although patients receiving haloperidol alone tended to have more extrapyramidal system symptoms. The superior results produced by the combination treatment support the use of lorazepam plus haloperidol as the treatment of choice for acute psychotic agitation.

Clinically significant interactions of psychotropic agents with antipsychotic drugs

Various psychotropic drugs are commonly combined with antipsychotic agents. Such combinations can induce pharmacodynamically based, presumably additive, beneficial (e.g. sedative or mood-altering) effects or adverse autonomic, cardiac depressant and CNS intoxicating effects. Clinically significant interactions also arise through competition with or induction of hepatic microsomal cytochrome P450 (CYP) enzymes, particularly the CYP1A2 and CYP2D6 isozymes by which most antipsychotics are oxidised. Such pharmacokinetic interactions can elevate circulating concentrations of antipsychotics (both typical agents and the atypical antipsychotic clozapine) to potentially toxic ranges, which may lead to increased risks of adverse effects. Such interactions occur particularly with serotonin (5-hydroxytryptamine; 5-HT) reuptake inhibitor antidepressants. Metabolic interactions that lead to lesser increases in antipsychotic concentrations may arise in combining these drugs with other antidepressants, benzodiazepines or propranolol. In contrast, most anticonvulsants, except valproic acid (sodium valproate), induce the oxidative metabolism of antipsychotics and can lower their plasma concentrations to potentially subtherapeutic levels, with unpredictable increases after their discontinuation. Since simultaneous use of multiple psychotropic agents is increasingly common, special caution is required to avoid untoward consequences of interactive adverse effects due to drug interactions, which can sometimes be severe or life-threatening.

Emergency treatment of psychotic symptoms. Pharmacokinetic considerations for antipsychotic drugs

Psychotic symptoms related to mental and medical disorders can pose a medical emergency. Selecting an appropriate antipsychotic medication to treat this emergency is based on the clinical situation, preferred route of administration, pharmacokinetic profile of the antipsychotic and the medications currently being taken by the patient. Intramuscular preparations are usually preferred over oral medication when the patients are not co-operative and require drugs with a faster onset of action and good bioavailability. High potency antipsychotics such as haloperidol and fluphenazine are effective in stabilising patients with psychotic symptoms quickly. Loxapine is an alternative when sedation is necessary and molindone is useful if a short-acting antipsychotic is required. Rapid neuroleptisation with intramuscular preparations of antipsychotic achieves therapeutic drug concentrations more rapidly, and also provides optimal control of psychotic symptoms. If the patient is cooperative, liquid oral preparations can be used; they are as effective as intramuscular formulations. If long term treatment with an antipsychotic in necessary and patients are stabilised, they can be switched from intramuscular to oral preparations. The oral dose is usually 1.5 to 5 times the total intramuscular dose per day, based on the bioavailability of the antipsychotic medication. If the patient is currently taking antipsychotic medication when the emergency situation occurs, it is usually adequate to increase the dose of antipsychotic drug. Appropriate dose adjustment or antipsychotic selection is necessary when drug interactions are expected. An in-depth knowledge of the pharmacokinetic profile and drug interaction profile of antipsychotic in necessary for the selection of the appropriate antipsychotic for any given emergency situation.

Treatment of bipolar disorder in children and adolescents

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the current status of research in the treatment of bipolar disorder in children and adolescents.

METHOD

A Medline search was conducted for articles on pharmacological or psychosocial treatment of bipolar disorder in children and adolescents.

RESULTS

There are no controlled studies with adequate sample size of the efficacy of lithium (or any other treatments) in bipolar children and adolescents. Two large open studies suggest that, overall, lithium is beneficial, but there also are reports of lithium resistance in bipolar children and adolescents. Small open studies suggest that mood-congruent delusions and hallucinations may be treated successfully with lithium alone. Data on adjuncts or alternatives to lithium in bipolar children and adolescents are sparse. Several controlled studies have been published on psychosocial treatment of child and adolescent depression, but none on mania.

CONCLUSIONS

Pharmacological and psychosocial treatments of bipolar disorder in children and adolescents are understudied. There is a need for well-designed, controlled studies of lithium and alternative medications as well as adjunctive psychosocial treatments.

The effect of carbamazepine on the 2-hydroxylation of desipramine

The effect of carbamazepine (CBZ, 200 mg twice daily for 28 days) on the kinetics of a single oral dose of desipramine (DMI, 100 mg) was investigated in six healthy volunteers. Compared with a control session, treatment with CBZ caused a marked increase in DMI apparent oral clearance (from 1.05 +/- 0.40 to 1.38 +/- 0.52 1 h per kg, means +/- SD, P < 0.01) and a significant shortening in DMI half-life (from 22.1 +/- 3.5 to 17.8 +/- 3.5 h, P < 0.01). The amount of 2-hydroxydesipramine (2-OH-DMI) excreted in urine over a 24-h period was significantly increased during CBZ intake (from 75 +/- 15 to 92 +/- 16 mumol, P < 0.01). These findings suggest that CBZ induces the 2-hydroxylation of DMI, a reaction primarily catalyzed by the polymorphic CYP2D6 isozyme. This interaction may have considerable practical significance.

The National Depressive and Manic-depressive Association (DMDA) survey of bipolar members

Members of the National Depressive and Manic-Depressive Association who have bipolar disorder were surveyed. 59% of respondents had their first symptoms during childhood or adolescence. Long delays between symptom onset, treatment-seeking, and receipt of a bipolar diagnosis were common. 45% of respondents currently experience frequent recurrences. Child/adolescent onset was associated with a positive family history, depressive or mixed initial symptoms, and frequent recurrence, with predominantly depressive symptoms. Frequent recurrences were associated with depressive or mixed initial symptoms and depressive episodes, but not with medication non-compliance. Both child/adolescent onset and frequent recurrence were associated with increased social morbidity, which was diminished by effective treatment. Respondents with frequent recurrences were less likely to be treated with mood-stabilizers, more likely to be treated with anti-depressants, or anxiolytics, and more likely to report past anxiety symptoms and diagnoses. 13% of respondents had no medical insurance, and 15% had failed to take medicine for financial reasons. The treatment of bipolar illness could be enhanced by (a) public health efforts to promote early diagnosis and treatment; (b) ensuring adequate trials of mood-stabilizers for patients with frequent recurrences; (c) further research on bipolar disorder with prominent anxiety symptoms; and (c) improved access to mental health care.

Antiepileptic drugs. A review of clinically significant drug interactions

Approximately 20 to 30% of patients with active intractable epilepsy are commonly treated with polytherapy antiepileptic drug regimens, and these patients may experience complicated drug interactions. Furthermore, because of the long term nature of treatment, the possibility of drug interactions with drugs used for the treatment of concomitant disease is high. Classically, clinically significant drug interactions, both pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic, have been considered to be detrimental to the patient, necessitating dosage adjustment. However, this need not always be the case. With the introduction of new drugs (e.g. vigabatrin and lamotrigine) with known mechanisms of action, the possibility exists that these can be used synergistically. The most commonly observed clinically significant pharmacokinetic interactions can be attributed to interactions at the metabolic and serum protein binding levels. The best known examples relate to induction (e.g. phenobarbital, phenytoin, carbamazepine and primidone) or inhibition [e.g. valproic acid (sodium valproate)] of hepatic monoxygenase enzymes. The extent and direction of interactions between the different antiepileptic drugs are varied and unpredictable. Interactions in which the metabolism of phenobarbital, phenytoin or carbamazepine is inhibited are particularly important since these are commonly associated with toxicity. Some inhibitory drugs include macrolide antibiotics, chloramphenicol, cimetidine, isoniazid and numerous sulphonamides. A reduction in efficacy of antibiotic, cardiovascular, corticosteroid, oral anticoagulant and oral contraceptive drugs occurs during combination therapy with enzyme-inducing antiepileptic drugs. Discontinuation of the enzyme inducer or inhibitor will influence the concentrations of the remaining drug(s) and may necessitate dosage readjustment.

Pharmacokinetics of antipsychotic drugs in man

Variability in the outcome of treatment with antipsychotic drugs may be due to differences in compliance and to variations in pharmacokinetics and concentration-response relationships at the receptor level. Among the various chemical classes of neuroleptics, the butyrophenones, the phenothiazines, and the thioxanthenes have similar pharmacokinetics, and show larger inter-individual variations in plasma drug levels after oral than after intramuscular doses. Compared to the "classical" neuroleptics, the more water-soluble benzamide derivatives have significantly shorter elimination half-lives, and show smaller inter-patient variations in plasma level: dose ratios at steady state.

Clinical issues in the use of carbamazepine in psychiatry: a review

Evidence is presented here in support of the efficacy of carbamazepine (CBZ) in a variety of different psychiatric conditions. While there is now considerable evidence to support the use of CBZ in the acute treatment of mania and in the prophylaxis of bipolar affective disorder, particularly as a second-line drug, its usefulness in other conditions is less well documented. Overactivity, aggression and poor impulse control appear to improve in a variety of different diagnostic categories, and it may possibly be more appropriately prescribed to control or prevent these symptoms than as a treatment for a particular disease entity. The use of CBZ as an anti-depressant is not well proven. Most of the adverse effects reported are due to rapid initial escalation of dosage, which can be avoided, or are reversible such as drug rashes. Severe adverse effects have been reported but are rare. Frequent monitoring of drug plasma concentration is not required. Some reports of synergism with lithium have appeared and combination therapy may be a useful strategy. Drug interactions, the need for clinical monitoring, and the possible pharmacological mode of action of CBZ are also discussed.

Rapid tranquilization of the violent patient

Agitated, psychotic patients with the potential for violence pose significant management problems for emergency department staff. With the advent of rapid tranquilization (RT), clinicians were offered a safe, effective method for controlling such patients, eliminating the need for restraints or seclusion rooms. While RT is regarded as a major treatment innovation in psychiatry, nonpsychiatrists are reluctant or unaware of the uses of antipsychotic medication as it pertains to RT. This article provides a brief overview of the pharmacokinetics of antipsychotic medication and reviews the following aspects of RT: route of administration, dosing, time intervals between doses, side effects, and alternative medications for RT. The authors also offer practical guidelines for RT use in the emergency department.

Doubleblind evaluation of the antimanic properties of carbamazepine as a comedication to haloperidol

1. Today carbamazepine is the most important alternative to neuroleptic drugs for the treatment of manic psychoses. Often carbamazepine is administered as a comedication to a neuroleptic. 2. A doubleblind study with 20 patients suffering from manic or schizomanic psychoses was performed to determine whether carbamazepine and haloperidol in comedication are more effective than haloperidol alone. 3. Under the tested conditions (24 mg haloperidol p.d.) only the smaller amount of additional medication with levomepromazine in the experimental group gave evidence for the antimanic effect of carbamazepine in combination with haloperidol. 4. Especially the patients with pure manic psychoses seem to benefit from carbamazepine as an adjunct to haloperidol.

Carbamazepine in psychiatry: a review

Carbamazepine is a tricyclic compound structurally related to imipramine that has been used since the 1960's for the treatment of trigeminal neuralgias and then approved as an anticonvulsant in the U.S. in 1974. In the last decade the use of carbamazepine has been expanded to include the treatment of certain disorders of mood and behaviour. In this paper possible clinical applications of carbamazepine in psychiatry are reviewed along with its pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic profile. Also discussed are adverse reactions and drug interactions which are relevant to its use.

Hospitalization effect in acute mania

We studied 31 patients meeting DSM-III criteria for bipolar affective disorder, manic type. All were treated in hospital, 18 on an open ward and 13 on a psychiatric intensive-care unit. Despite the use of only moderate doses of medication, dramatic clinical improvement was observed over the first 48 hours of treatment using the Brief Psychiatric Rating Scale and Beigel Mania Rating Scale as objective rating measures. Significantly greater improvement occurred in the psychiatric intensive-care unit in comparison to the open ward. We suggest that hospitalization effect is of prime importance in the early management of the acutely manic patient.

Neuroleptic drugs in the treatment of acute psychosis: how much do we really know?

The efficacy of neuroleptic antipsychotic drugs has been well demonstrated and neuroleptics are the standard treatment of acute psychosis. However, important aspects of neuroleptic treatment, including course of response, optimal doses, and mechanism of action, remain poorly studied or controversial. Placebo-controlled studies of the onset of the response of acute psychosis to neuroleptics are few and yield conflicting results. Studies of the relationship of doses and blood levels to the therapeutic effects of neuroleptics suggest that the optimal range of doses and levels is narrow and that commonly used doses are too high. Finally, studies of the mechanism of action of neuroleptics suggest that the dopamine hypothesis is based on unsupported assumptions concerning drug effects, drug distribution, and effective doses of drug. Alternative hypotheses, that the antipsychotic effects of the neuroleptics are mediated, at least in part, through alpha 1-adrenergic or serotonin 5-HT2 receptor antagonism, are reviewed. The evidence regarding these issues and controversies is discussed, and specific approaches to increase our understanding and enhance our use of the neuroleptics are suggested.