Gadolinium-enhanced multidetector CT angiography of the thoracoabdominal aorta

Feasibility of gadolinium-diethylene triamine pentaacetic acid enhanced multidetector computed tomography for the evaluation of coronary artery disease

BACKGROUND

Multidetector computed tomography (MDCT) has been proposed as a noninvasive method for the diagnosis of obstructive coronary artery disease (CAD). In patients with high risk of iodinated contrast adverse effects such as acute allergic-type reactions, the use of gadolinium could be an alternative.

OBJECTIVE

We sought to evaluate the feasibility of gadolinium-enhanced MDCT for the diagnosis of obstructive CAD.

METHODS

Twenty patients (mean age, 61 years; range, 50-73 years) referred for X-ray coronary angiography were studied by both gadolinium and iodine-enhanced 16-row MDCT coronary angiography. The degree of enhancement and the accuracy for detection of obstructive CAD (>50% diameter reduction) were evaluated with X-ray coronary angiography as the standard. Renal nephrotoxicity was strictly monitored.

RESULTS

Gadolinium- and iodine-enhanced MDCT showed adequate visualization of the coronary arteries in 310 of the 312 coronary artery segments that were available by X-ray angiography, respectively. The average density of the coronary arteries in both iodine and gadolinium CT scans was 253.65 Hounsfield unit (HU) and 135.20 HU, respectively. In a per-coronary segment analysis, gadolinium- and iodine-enhanced MDCT showed sensitivities of 89% vs 84%, specificities of 96% vs 95%, and negative predictive values of 97% vs 96%, respectively. In a per-patient analysis, both gadolinium- and iodine-enhanced MDCT showed sensitivities of 92.85% vs specificities of 83.33%. Intermethod agreement between gadolinium- and iodine-enhanced MDCT (kappa) was 0.95 (P < 0.0001).

CONCLUSION

Our preliminary results indicate lower attenuation with gadolinium but similar diagnostic accuracy for the detection of obstructive CAD when compared with iodine-enhanced MDCT. Therefore, gadolinium is a feasible alternative contrast agent for patients with iodine contrast allergy referred for MDCT coronary angiography.

One-molar gadolinium chelate (gadobutrol) as a contrast agent for CT angiography of the thoracic and abdominal aorta

The aim of our study was to evaluate the use of a 1-molar gadolinium chelate (gadobutrol) as an alternative contrast medium for computed tomography angiography (CTA) exams of the aorta. CTA exams of the thoracic and/or abdominal aorta were performed on 15 patients with contraindications for the use of iodine who were not suitable for magnetic resonance examinations. The exams were performed with a 16-detector row scanner, injecting a mean dose of 0.37 mmol Gd/kg of body weight at a flow rate of 4 ml/s. Creatinine levels were obtained prior to the exam in patients with impaired renal function, and 24 and 48 h afterwards. The mean attenuation values obtained in the middle ascending and middle descending thoracic aorta were 202.3 and 216.8, respectively. The mean HU values of the abdominal aorta were 210.4 at the level of the renal arteries and 186.8 in the aortic bifurcation. All the exams were considered diagnostically adequate. No significant increase in serum creatinine was observed 24 and 48 h after the exam. We believe that gadobutrol could be an alternative contrast medium for CTA exams with 16-detector row scanners in patients with contraindications for iodinated contrast medium.

CT angiography with gadolinium-based contrast media

RATIONALE AND OBJECTIVES

To evaluate the potential use of gadolinium (Gd)-based contrast media, especially that of Gadovist, a 1-molar Gd medium, in computed tomography (CT) and compare our findings with standard iodinated contrast media.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

Using a live rabbit and an acrylic CT body phantom for comparative CT imaging of Gd- and I-based media. The images were acquired at 80, 100, and 120 kVp, using fixed standard beam filtration. The phantom study used serial dilutions of the Magnevist and Ultravist 300 (2.4-molar I), whereas the animal study used different volumes of Gadovist, Magnevist (0.5 molar Gd), and Ultravist administered intravenously.

RESULTS

At 80 kVp for the same injection volumes of Gadovist and Ultravist, the image contrast enhancement of the aorta with Gadovist was 40% lower than that of Ultravist. In the phantom studies, however, for the same kVp settings the CT image contrast was up to fourfold higher for Gd compared with iodine when comparing the same molar concentrations of the two elements in the solutions.

CONCLUSION

These results indicate a potential of Gd-based media for clinical CT angiography and provide incentive for further investigation of this subject.

Gadolinium-Enhanced Computed Tomographic Angiography: Current Status

This article reviews the research to date, as well as our clinical experience from two institutions, on gadolinium-enhanced computed tomographic angiography (gCTA) for imaging the body. gCTA may be an appropriate examination for the small percentage of patients who would benefit from noninvasive vascular imaging, but who have contraindications to both iodinated contrast and magnetic resonance imaging. gCTA is more expensive than CTA with iodinated contrast, due to the dose of gadolinium administered, and gCTA has limitations compared with CTA with iodinated contrast, in that parenchymal organs are not optimally enhanced at doses of 0.5 mmol/kg or lower. However, in our experience, gCTA has been a very useful problem-solving examination in carefully selected patients. With the advent of 16-64 detector CT, in combination with bolus tracking, we believe that the overall dose of gadolinium needed for diagnostic CTA examinations, while relatively high, can be safely administered.

Gadolinium-enhanced MDCT angiography of the abdomen: feasibility and limitations

OBJECTIVE

The purpose of this study was to evaluate a protocol for gadolinium-enhanced MDCT angiography of the abdomen and to identify technical parameters that optimize image quality.

CONCLUSION

The degree of enhancement and image quality achieved using this gadolinium-enhanced MDCT angiography appear adequate for angiographic evaluation of the abdominal aorta and its major branches.

Four- and eight-channel aortoiliac CT angiography: a comparative study

PURPOSE

To compare performance parameters, contrast material load and radiation dose in a patient cohort having aortoiliac CT angiography using 4- and 8-channel multidetector CT (MDCT) systems.

METHODS

Eighteen patients with abdominal aortic aneurysms underwent initial 4-channel and follow-up 8-channel MDCT angiography. Both the 4- and 8-channel MDCT systems utilized a matrix detector of 16 x 1.25 mm rows. Scan coverage included the abdominal aorta and iliac arteries to the level of the proximal femoral arteries. For 4-channel MDCT, nominal slice thickness and beam pitch were 1.25 mm and 1.5, respectively, and for 8-channel MDCT they were 1.25 mm and 1.35 or 1.65 respectively. Scan duration, iodinated contrast material load and mean aortoiliac attenuation were compared retrospectively. Comparative radiation dose measurements for 4- and 8-channel MDCT were obtained using a multiple scan average dose technique on an abdominal phantom.

RESULTS

Compared with 4-channel MDCT, 8-channel MDCT aortoiliac angiography was performed with equivalent collimation, decreased contrast load (mean 45% decrease: 144 ml versus 83 ml of 300 mg iodine/ml contrast material) and decreased acquisition time (mean 51% shorter: 34.4 sec versus 16.9 sec) without a significant change in mean aortic enhancement (299 HU versus 300 HU, p > 0.05). Radiation dose was 2 rad for the 4-channel system and 2/1.5 rad for the 8-channel system at 1.35/1.65 pitch respectively.

CONCLUSION

Compared with 4-channel MDCT, aortoiliac CT angiography with 8-channel MDCT produces equivalent z-axis resolution with decreased contrast load and acquisition time without increased radiation exposure.

Safety and Effectiveness of Gadolinium-enhanced Multi–Detector Row Spiral CT Angiography of the Chest: Preliminary Results in 37 Patients with Contraindications to Iodinated Contrast Agents

PURPOSE

To prospectively evaluate the safety and effectiveness of gadolinium-enhanced multi-detector row spiral computed tomographic (CT) angiography of the pulmonary circulation by using two gadolinium doses in patients with contraindications to iodinated contrast agents.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Study was approved by the Ethics Committee, and written informed consent was obtained. Thirty-seven patients (20 men, 17 women) with contraindications to iodinated contrast agents (allergic reactions, n = 27; impaired renal function, n = 10) underwent CT angiography of the pulmonary circulation in search of acute pulmonary embolism (n = 28) or for management of tumoral disease (n = 9). CT angiography was performed (a) with four-detector row (n = 19) or 16-detector row (n = 18) scanners; (b) at randomly assigned gadolinium doses of either 0.3 mmol per kilogram of body weight (n = 19) or 0.4 mmol/kg (n = 18); and (c) with a systematic evaluation of clinical and biologic tolerance of gadolinium. Comparison of percentages between group 1 and group 2 scans was performed with the chi2 or the Fisher exact test. An unpaired Wilcoxon rank sum test was used for numeric variables. P < .05 was considered to indicate a significant difference.

RESULTS

The mean (+/- standard deviation) volume of gadopentetate dimeglumine administered in the overall study group was 48 mL +/- 9.6 (range, 29-65 mL). The level of maximal enhancement in the pulmonary arteries was significantly higher in group 2 than in group 1 (215.8 HU +/- 95 vs 141.3 HU +/- 44) (P = .02) and was maintained throughout the entire region of interest in a greater number of examinations in group 2 than in group 1 (n = 16 [89%] vs n = 2 [10.5%]) (P < .0001). The number of diagnostic CT angiograms was significantly higher in group 2 than in group 1 (n = 17 [94%] vs n = 13 [68%]) (P = .007). Significant but transient reduction of creatinine clearance was observed in one patient with preexisting moderate chronic renal failure (0.3 mmol/kg gadolinium dose).

CONCLUSION

High-quality gadolinium-enhanced CT angiograms require the use of 16-detector row CT technology; the doses administered did not alter the renal function except transiently in one patient.

Aortoiliac Gadolinium-enhanced CT Angiography: Improved Results with a 16–Detector Row Scanner Compared with a Four–Detector Row Scanner

PURPOSE

To assess the level of vascular enhancement of gadolinium-enhanced aortoiliac computed tomographic (CT) angiography with a 16-detector row CT scanner and to compare it with the results of previous similar studies that used four-detector row CT units.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Eleven gadolinium-enhanced CT angiograms were obtained in 10 consecutive patients with contraindication to iodinated contrast medium with use of a 16-detector row CT scanner. In the region of interest, attenuation measurements (in HU) were obtained from the proximal abdominal aorta to the common femoral arteries during unenhanced, gadolinium-enhanced, and delayed acquisitions. The results were compared to those in the 15 consecutive patients who most recently had similar examinations performed on a four-detector row CT unit. Phantom studies with diluted gadolinium were conducted to compare attenuation between CT units.

RESULTS

On four-detector row CT, throughout the scan length, mean enhancement values were 53.8 HU +/- 5.3 and 15.0 HU +/- 2.6 for gadolinium-enhanced and delayed series, respectively. For the 16-detector row CT unit, they were 76.1 HU +/- 3.4 and 21.3 HU +/- 1.3, respectively. As a result of a shorter scan time and a more optimal start time, the 16-detector row CT unit provided significantly greater and more consistent enhancement throughout the scan length compared with the four-detector row CT unit (P =.0106). Similar structures had significantly greater enhancement when 120 kV was applied instead of 140 kV (P =.0495)

CONCLUSION

The 16-detector row CT scanner improved gadolinium-enhanced CT angiography results compared with the four-detector row CT unit.

CT of acute abdominal aortic disorders

Aortic aneurysm rupture, aortic dissection, PAU, acute aortic occlusion, traumatic aortic injury, and aortic fistula represent acute abdominal aortic conditions. Because of its speed and proximity to the emergency department, helical CT is the imaging test of choice for these conditions. MR imaging also plays an important role in the imaging of aortic dissection and PAU, particularly when the patient is unable to receive intravenous contrast material. In this era of MDCT, conventional angiography is used as a secondary diagnostic tool to clarify equivocal findings on cross-sectional imaging. Ultrasound is helpful when CT is not readily available and the patient is unable or too unstable to undergo MR imaging.