Transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt for the management of hepatic hydrothorax in the absence of ascites

Outcomes of transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunts for ascites

Refractory ascites represents a devastating complication of portal hypertension. Transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt (TIPS) is an efficacious option for patients for whom transplant is not an immediate option. Techniques to optimize the hepatic venous pressure gradient and the use of covered stents have reduced rates of hepatic encephalopathy and stent occlusion, respectively. Patients with a Model for End-Stage Liver Disease score less than 15, serum creatinine less than 2 mg/dL, and serum bilirubin less than 2 mg/dL are particularly suited for TIPS placement. TIPS is also effective for hepatic hydrothorax and for massive ascites in the posttransplant setting, although future investigations are necessary to elucidate risk factors and establish the effect on transplant-free survival.

Chemical pleurodesis for the management of refractory hepatic hydrothorax in patients with decompensated liver cirrhosis

Background/Aims

Hepatic hydrothorax in patients with decompensated liver cirrhosis is a challenging problem. Treatment with diuretics and intermittent thoracentesis can be effective in selected patients. However, there are few effective therapeutic options in patients who are intolerant of these therapies. This study investigated the clinical usefulness of chemical pleurodesis with or without video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery (VATS) for patients with refractory hepatic hydrothorax.

Methods

Eleven consecutive patients with refractory hepatic hydrothorax who underwent chemical pleurodesis with or without VATS between July 2007 and February 2011 were enrolled in this study. The medical records and radiologic imagings of these patients were thoroughly reviewed.

Results

The median number of chemical pleurodesis sessions performed was 3 (range: 2-10). Successful pleurodesis was achieved in 8 of the 11 patients (72.7%), 5 (62.5%) of whom remained asymptomatic and hydrothorax free for a median follow-up of 16 weeks (range: 2-52 weeks). Complications were low-grade fever/leukocytosis (n=11, 100%), pneumonia (n=1, 9.1%), pneumothorax (n=4, 36.4%), azotemia/acute renal failure (n=6, 54.6%), and hepatic encephalopathy (n=4, 36.4%). Five patients were suspected as having procedure-related mortality (45.5%) due to the occurrence of acute renal failure with hepatic failure. The overall survival was significantly longer in the success group than in the non-success group.

Conclusions

Although chemical pleurodesis may improve the clinical symptoms and the radiologic findings in as many as 72.7% of patients with refractory hepatic hydrothorax, a significantly high prevalence of procedure-related morbidity and mortality hinders the routine application of this procedure for such patients.

Impact of therapeutic interventions on survival of patients with hepatic hydrothorax

BACKGROUND/PURPOSE

Hepatic hydrothorax is an uncommon but important complication of liver cirrhosis. The optimal management of this condition remains unclear. This retrospective study evaluated the impact of therapeutic interventions on the outcome of patients with hepatic hydrothorax.

METHODS

From August 1996 to March 2004, the medical charts of 52 patients with hepatic hydrothorax in the National Taiwan University Hospital were reviewed. Treatment methods, outcome of interventions, and survival time were described and analyzed.

RESULTS

At the time of diagnosis, four patients were Child-Pugh class A, 20 were class B, and 28 were class C. Twenty-eight (53.8%) patients received supportive care with thoracentesis for symptom relief. Among the other 24 patients, 16 (30.8%) were treated by chemical pleurodesis, 14 (26.9%) underwent surgical interventions, and six (11.5%) received both interventions. Intervention success, defined as resolution of hydrothorax for at least 3 months after the procedure, was achieved in 37.5% and 42.9% of patients who underwent chemical pleurodesis and surgery, respectively, with an overall success rate of 50%. The median survival of all patients was 8.6 months (range, 0.2-77.6 months). The median survival of patients with intervention success (22.5 months) was significantly longer than those with intervention failure (5.4 months) and supportive care (6.3 months). Multivariate analysis showed that only intervention success (p = 0.010, hazard ratio = 0.25) was an independent predictor of survival.

CONCLUSION

For patients with hepatic hydrothorax, aggressive medical or surgical intervention might improve survival over supportive management, especially when resolution of hydrothorax can be maintained for at least 3 months.

Outcomes of patients with chest tube insertion for hepatic hydrothorax

PURPOSE

Case reports and small case series have reported a high rate of complications associated with chest tube placement for hepatic hydrothorax. We describe the in-hospital and 3-month outcomes of patients who have had this procedure.

METHODS

A retrospective medical record review was performed of all patients admitted to a tertiary care center over a 10-year period with a chest tube placed for hepatic hydrothorax. Demographic data and outcomes were collected and analyzed.

RESULTS

Seventeen patients were identified; 12 were taking diuretics and 8 were taking multiple diuretics at the time of admission. MELD score was 14 (range = 7-34). During hospitalization, 16 had at least 1 and 12 had more than 1 complications. The most common complications were acute kidney injury (n = 11), pneumothorax (n = 7), and empyema (n = 5). Two patients died during the index admission and four others within 3 months of that admission. Six of seven patients who received TIPS survived.

CONCLUSIONS

Chest tube insertion for hepatic hydrothorax carries significant morbidity and mortality, with questionable benefit.

Mechanical pleurodesis aided by peritoneal drainage: procedure for hepatic hydrothorax

BACKGROUND

Hepatic hydrothorax in the setting of decompensated cirrhosis is a challenging and common clinical problem. Traditional therapies such as diuretics and transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunts can be effective therapies in selected patients but in patients ineligible for, or intolerant of, these traditional therapies, few effective therapeutic options remain for the management of hepatic hydrothorax.

METHODS

We present a series of 5 consecutive patients with refractory hepatic hydrothorax who underwent combined thorascopically guided mechanical and chemical pleurodesis aided by an intraperitoneal drain that prevented reaccumulation of the ascites while pleural inflammation and adhesion were progressing. We speculate that the prolonged contact between the parietal and visceral pleura allowed by prevention of reaccumulation of intraabdominal ascites and subsequent flux through the pleural space enhanced the efficacy of this procedure in comparison with those presented in the literature.

RESULTS

Despite the fact that all of our patients presented with decompensated cirrhosis, the surgical procedure and subsequent hospitalization were tolerated well by our entire cohort. Colonization of the pleural and peritoneal drainage fluid was a common complication of this procedure but was not associated with prolonged morbidity or mortality.

CONCLUSIONS

We present a therapy for the difficult clinical problem of refractory hepatic hydrothorax that may allow selected patients an opportunity for prolonged symptomatic control.

Miscellaneous indications for transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic stent-shunt

This review will discuss the use of transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic stent-shunt in a number of relatively uncommon clinical situations. In particular, we will focus our paper on the use of transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic stent-shunt for hepatic hydrothorax, hepatopulmonary syndrome, veno-occlusive disease, portal hypertensive gastropathy and gastric antral vascular ectasia, before surgery and after liver transplantation.

Transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt

The transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt (TIPS) is an interventional treatment resulting in decompression of the portal system by creation of a side-to-side portosystemic anastomosis. Since its introduction 16 years ago, more than 1,000 publications have appeared demonstrating broad acceptance and increasing clinical use. This review summarizes our present knowledge about technical aspects and complications, follow-up of patients and indications. A technical success rate near 100% and a low occurrence of complications clearly depend on the skills of the operator. The follow-up of the TIPS patient has to assess shunt patency, liver function, hepatic encephalopathy and the possible development of hepatocellular carcinoma. Shunt patency can best be monitored by duplex sonography and can avoid routine radiological revision. Short-term patency may be improved by anticoagulation, while such a treatment does not influence long-term patency. Stent grafts covered with expanded polytetrafluoroethylene show promising long-term patency comparable with that of surgical shunts. With respect to the indications of TIPS, much is known about treatment of variceal bleeding and refractory ascites. The thirteen randomized studies that are available to date show that survival is comparable in patients receiving TIPS or endoscopic treatment for acute or recurrent variceal bleeding. Another group comprises patients with refractory ascites and related complications, such as hepatorenal syndrome and hepatic hydrothorax. It has been demonstrated that TIPS improves these complications. Five randomized studies comparing TIPS with paracentesis and one study comparing TIPS with the peritoneo-venous shunt showed good response of ascites but controversial results on survival. In addition, TIPS has been successfully applied to patients with Budd-Chiari syndrome, portal vein thrombosis, before liver transplantation, and for the treatment of ectopic variceal bleeding.

Hepatic hydrothorax in the absence of ascites diagnosed by intraperitoneal spraying of indocyanine green

Hepatic hydrothorax in the absence of ascites is a rare complication of liver cirrhosis. A 56-year-old woman was referred to our hospital because of a massive pleural effusion on the right side, requiring continuous drainage. Although the patient was known to have chronic hepatitis C, she had no signs of hepatic failure including ascites. A laparoscopic examination revealed a nodular liver and a small volume of ascites in the peritoneal cavity. Indocyanine green sprayed into the intraperitoneal cavity was excreted from the pleural drain just after the spraying, indicating an intraperitoneal origin of the pleural fluid. Discontinuation of pleural drainage and an introduction of standard treatment for ascites due to liver cirrhosis (including restriction of salt intake and diuretic administration) resulted in a marked decrease of pleural effusion.

Hepatic hydrothorax: pathophysiology, diagnosis, and management

Hepatic hydrothorax occurs in approximately 5 to 12% of patients with cirrhosis and portal hypertension. Various therapeutic modalities ranging from dietary and pharmacologic interventions to surgical approaches are available for the management of this condition. Treatment must be individualized based on the patient's response to conservative management as well as the severity of the underlying liver disease. Hepatic hydrothorax may be complicated by spontaneous bacterial empyema, which portends a poor prognosis with a mortality rate of up to 20%. All patients with hepatic hydrothorax should be evaluated for possible liver transplantation.

Hepatic hydrothorax

A hepatic hydrothorax is a pleural effusion that develops in a patient with cirrhosis and portal hypertension in the absence of cardiopulmonary disease. The pleural effusion is derived from ascitic fluid that enters the chest because of the negative pressure within the pleural space via defects in the diaphragm. The peritoneal-to-pleural flow of fluid can be demonstrated by nuclear scanning, even when the ascites is not clinically apparent. The pleural fluid usually has the characteristics of a transudate. However, an occasional patient with hepatic hydrothorax will develop spontaneous bacterial pleuritis manifest by increased pleural fluid neutrophils or a positive bacterial culture and will require antibiotic therapy. Treatment of the hydrothorax is directed at the underlying liver disease but a dyspneic patient can obtain relief from a thoracentesis or paracentesis. When medical therapy fails, liver transplantation is the treatment of choice. Both transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunting and thoracoscopic repair of diaphragmatic defects with pleural sclerosis can provide symptomatic relief, but the morbidity and mortality of these procedures are high because of the fragile nature of the patients.

Treatment of hepatic hydrothorax and reduction of chest tube output with octreotide

Hepatic hydrothorax is a dreaded complication in patients with liver cirrhosis. Placement of chest tubes can alleviate respiratory distress, but patients often succumb due to excessive fluid and protein loss via the open drain. Our case illustrates that high-dose octreotide can strongly reduce hepatic hydrothorax drainage volume. This allows removal of the chest tube, which would otherwise not have been possible.

Treatment of refractory hepatic hydrothorax with transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt: long-term results in 40 patients

BACKGROUND/AIMS

Hepatic hydrothorax is a complication of portal hypertension secondary to ascites. In this study, we investigated retrospectively the effects of the transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt (TIPS) on hepatic hydrothorax refractory to diuretic treatment.

METHODS

Forty patients (Child-Pugh class B, 24 patients; Child-Pugh class C, 16 patients) with hydrothorax refractory to diuretic treatment, pleurocenteses or pleurodesis were included. The TIPS implantation was successful in all patients, who were then followed for 16 +/- 14 months (range 1 day-54 months).

RESULTS

TIPS reduced the portosystemic pressure gradient from 26 +/- 6 to 10 +/- 5 mmHg. In the 17 patients whom we followed for 12 months or longer, improvements were found for the Child--Pugh score (8.6 +/- 1.8 v. 6.7 +/- 1.5), serum albumin concentration (3.1 +/- 0.5 v. 3.6 +/- 0.5 g/l), and urinary sodium excretion (22 +/- 29 v. 89 +/- 43 mmol/24 h) (P< 0.05). Two patients developed severe hepatic encephalopathy requiring shunt occlusion. Hydrothorax improved in 82% of patients and resolved in 71% of patients. Fifty per cent of patients developed shunt insufficiency within 7 +/- 9 months, contributing to a probability of relapse-free 1-year survival of 35%. In these patients, shunt revision resulted in a secondary response rate of 82.3%. The 1-year survival was 64%. Both hydrothorax response and survival showed a significant inverse correlation with age over 60 years (P< 0.01 and P< 0.003, respectively) but not with other biomedical variables.

CONCLUSION

TIPS is effective for hydrothorax refractory to diuretic treatment and other standard interventions to bridge the time to transplantation. Patients older than 60 years have a poor response and short survival.

Hepatic hydrothorax: a retrospective case study

PURPOSE

To present the pathophysiology, differential diagnoses, assessment techniques, and treatment options for hepatic hydrothorax.

DATA SOURCES

A case study is presented with supporting material from current medical literature.

CONCLUSIONS

Hepatic hydrothorax is a pleural effusion caused by the flow of ascitic fluid into the pleural space through an actual defect in the diaphragm. Successful outcomes depend on early detection and timely referral of often-subtle lung involvement.

IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE

Although incidence is reported to be as high as 12% in cirrhotic patients, standard medical references attach little importance to pulmonary risks in this population. Hepatic hydrothorax should always be considered in the cirrhotic patient with a pleural effusion.

Management of ascites

The evaluation of ascites includes a directed history, focused physical examination, and diagnostic paracentesis with ascitic fluid analysis. Dietary sodium restriction and oral diuretics are the mainstay of therapy for the majority of patients with cirrhotic ascites. Transjugular intrahepatic portocaval shunt has emerged as the treatment of choice for selected patients with refractory ascites, although serial large-volume paracenteses should be attempted first. Early diagnosis, broad-spectrum antibiotics, and albumin infusion contribute to the successful management of spontaneous bacterial peritonitis (SBP). Referral for liver transplant evaluation should be considered at the first sign of decompensation and should not be delayed until development of ominous clinical features, such as refractory ascites and SBP.

The use and misuse of transjugular intrahepatic portasystemic shunts

Transjugular intrahepatic portasystemic shunts, or TIPS, are used to create a low-resistance channel between the hepatic vein and the intrahepatic portion of the portal vein by deployment of an expandable metal stent. TIPS function like side-to-side surgical portacaval shunts, but their placement does not require anesthesia and major surgery. This article reviews the uses and misuses of TIPS in current practice. The uses include variceal hemorrhage and ascites as well as miscellaneous indications such as Budd-Chiari syndrome, veno-occlusive disease, bleeding ectopic and rectal varices, hepatic hydrothorax, and portal hypertensive gastropathy. TIPS is not indicated for primary prophylaxis of variceal hemorrhage, prehepatic portal hypertension, correction of hypersplenism and thrombocytopenia, pulmonary hypertension and hepatopulmonary syndrome, and portal hypertension associated with polycystic liver disease or Caroli's disease. Also reviewed herein is the management of patients after TIPS placement.

Primary placement of Palmaz long medium stents in transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunts

PURPOSE

To describe our results with primary placement of the long-medium Palmaz stent for transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunts (TIPS).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Between December 1997 and December 1998 primary placement of long-medium Palmaz stents was performed for TIPS procedures in 17 patients. Patency was determined with ultrasound, angiography, or pathologic examination in the event of transplant.

RESULTS

Primary patency was achieved in 13 of 17 patients (76.5%) (follow up, 1-399 days; mean, 99 days). Secondary patency was achieved in 17 of 17 patients (100%) (follow-up, 1-399 days; mean, 110 days). Among the four patients who required revision, the mean time to revision from initial shunt creation was 81 days (range, 13-125 days). Two of these four patients had symptoms of worsening ascites as well as abnormal ultrasound findings prior to their revision; the other two patients were asymptomatic and had abnormal ultrasound findings only. Revisions were performed for intimal hyperplasia within the stent in three of the patients and acute thrombus within the stent in the remaining patient. Kaplan-Meier survival analysis for primary patency yielded mean survival time of 265 days (standard error, 52 days).

CONCLUSION

The long-medium Palmaz stent is a viable stent for creation of TIPS shunts.

Transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunts (TIPS): a decade later

Since the introduction of transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt (TIPS) 10 years ago, it has been used increasingly in the management of portal hypertension and its complications. TIPS is now considered the procedure of choice for management of refractory variceal bleeding. Its role in the management of refractory ascites, hepatic hydrothorax, hepatorenal syndrome, and hepatopulmonary syndrome still awaits further prospective studies. The two main complications of TIPS are hepatic encephalopathy and shunt malfunction. Generally, TIPS stenosis or occlusion is a major drawback requiring routine surveillance of TIPS with doppler ultrasound. Venography with balloon dilation of the stent or placement of serial or parallel stents may be required in some cases. Promising modalities of preventing TIPS malfunction (e.g., brachy-therapy, covered stents, or anti-platelet derived growth factor) are currently being investigated.

A successful surgical repair of the hepatic hydrothorax using pneumoperitoneum: report of a case

A successful surgical repair of a right hepatic hydrothorax in the absence of ascites is reported. A technetium-99m scintigram that was injected intraperitoneally provided evidence of a one-way flow of fluid from the peritoneal to pleural cavity. To identify any possible minute defects in the diaphragm, carbon dioxide was insufflated into the peritoneal cavity during the operation. We performed a direct suture of the defect observed on the diaphragm. The pleural effusion subsequently vanished after the operation.

Hepatic hydrothorax: pathogenesis, diagnosis, and management

Hepatic hydrothorax is defined as a pleural effusion in a patient with cirrhosis of the liver and no cardiopulmonary disease. The estimated prevalence of this often debilitating complication in patients with liver cirrhosis is 4% to 10%. Its pathophysiology involves movement of ascitic fluid from the peritoneal cavity into the pleural space through diaphragmatic defects. As a result patients are at increased risk of respiratory infection. Initial management consists of sodium restriction, diuretics, and thoracentesis. A transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt may be required. Because most patients with hepatic hydrothorax have end-stage liver disease, a liver transplant should be considered if these options fail.

Current status of transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunts

The use of the transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt (TIPS) has emerged as an important nonoperative modality for variceal bleeding, intractable ascites, and for selected cases of hepatic venous obstruction. We believe that TIPS should be viewed as a 'bridge' to liver transplantation and should be carried out only in experienced centres. The adverse haemodynamic changes on the cardiopulmonary system after TIPS should be borne in mind. Prospective trials to evaluate the role of TIPS versus sclerotherapy in variceal bleeding will be watched with interest. There is, however, an urgent need to improve long-term results of TIPS as stent thrombosis and stenosis occur frequently. We advocate routine surveillance to detect these problems at an early stage.

The first decade of the transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt (TIPS): state of the art

The transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt (TIPS) is an interventional treatment resulting in decompression of the portal system by creation of a side-to-side portosystemic anastomosis. Since its introduction 10 years ago, more than 500 publications have appeared demonstrating rapid acceptance and increasing clinical use. This review summarizes the present knowledge of technical aspects and complications, follow-up of patients, and indications. With respect to the technique, the TIPS procedure is probably one of the most difficult interventions and, therefore, technical success and complications clearly depend on the skills of the operator. Thus, the number and kind of complications reported in this review do not necessarily relate to the procedural complications of an experienced center. The follow-up of the TIPS patient has to assess shunt patency, liver function and hepatic encephalopathy. Shunt patency can best be monitored by duplex-sonography. Routine radiological revision seems not to be helpful and does not improve results, i.e., rebleeding and survival. Short term patency may be improved by anticoagulation, while such a treatment does not influence long-term patency. With respect to the indications of TIPS, much is known about treatment of variceal bleeding. The nine randomized studies that are available to date show that survival is comparable between patients receiving TIPS or endoscopic treatment. The second group of patients is the group with refractory ascites and related complications, such as hepatorenal syndrome and hepatic hydrothorax. It has been demonstrated that TIPS improves these complications, but randomized studies are still lacking. In addition, TIPS has been applied successfully to patients with Budd-Chiari syndrome, portal vein thrombosis, before liver transplantation, and for the treatment of ectopic portal hypertensive bleeding.