Current concepts in the management of paraesophageal hiatal hernia

The effect of frailty and age on outcomes in elective paraesophageal hernia repair

INTRODUCTION

Paraesophageal hernia repair (PEHR) is a safe and effective operation. Previous studies have described risk factors for poor peri-operative outcomes such as emergent operations or advanced patient age, and pre-operative frailty is a known risk factor in other major surgery. The goal of this retrospective cohort study was to determine if markers of frailty were predictive of poor peri-operative outcomes in elective paraesophageal hernia repair.

METHODS

Patients who underwent elective PEHR between 1/2011 and 6/2022 at a single university-based institution were identified. Patient demographics, modified frailty index (mFI), and post-operative outcomes were recorded. A composite peri-operative morbidity outcome indicating the incidence of any of the following: prolonged length of stay (≥ 3 days), increased discharge level of care, and 30-day complications or readmissions was utilized for statistical analysis. Descriptive statistics and logistic regression were used to analyze the data.

RESULTS

Of 547 patients who underwent elective PEHR, the mean age was 66.0 ± 12.3, and 77.1% (n = 422) were female. Median length of stay was 1 [IQR 1, 2]. ASA was 3-4 in 65.8% (n = 360) of patients. The composite outcome occurred in 32.4% (n = 177) of patients. On multivariate analysis, increasing age (OR 1.021, p = 0.02), high frailty (OR 2.02, p < 0.01), ASA 3-4 (OR 1.544, p = 0.05), and redo-PEHR (OR 1.72, p = 0.02) were each independently associated with the incidence of the composite outcome. On a regression of age for the composite outcome, a cutoff point of increased risk is identified at age 72 years old (OR 2.25, p < 0.01).

CONCLUSION

High frailty and age over 72 years old each independently confer double the odds of a composite morbidity outcome that includes prolonged post-operative stay, peri-operative complications, the need for a higher level of care after elective paraesophageal hernia repair, and 30-day readmission. This provides additional information to counsel patients pre-operatively, as well as a potential opportunity for targeted pre-habilitation.

Laparoscopic repair of paraesophageal hernias

Background and Objectives:

Laparoscopy has quickly become the standard surgical approach to repair paraesophageal hernias. Although many centers routinely perform this procedure, relatively high recurrence rates have led many surgeons to question this approach. We sought to evaluate outcomes in our cohort of patients with an emphasis on recurrence rates and symptom improvement and their correlation with true radiologic recurrence seen on contrast imaging.

Methods:

We retrospectively identified 126 consecutive patients who underwent laparoscopic repair of a large paraesophageal hernia between 2000 and 2010. Clinical outcomes were reviewed, and data were collected regarding operative details, perioperative and postoperative complications, symptoms, and follow-up imaging. Radiologic evidence of any size hiatal hernia was considered to indicate a recurrence.

Results:

There were 95 female and 31 male patients with a mean age (± standard deviation) of 71 ± 14 years. Laparoscopic repair was completed successfully in 120 of 126 patients, with 6 operations converted to open procedures. Crural reinforcement with mesh was performed in 79% of patients, and 11% underwent a Collis gastroplasty. Fundoplications were performed in 90% of patients: Nissen (112), Dor (1), and Toupet (1). Radiographic surveillance, obtained at a mean time interval of 23 months postoperatively, was available in 89 of 126 patients (71%). Radiographic evidence of a recurrence was present in 19 patients (21%). Reoperation was necessary in 6 patients (5%): 5 for symptomatic recurrence (4%) and 1 for dysphagia (1%). The median length of stay was 4 days.

Conclusion:

Laparoscopic paraesophageal hernia repair results in an excellent outcome with a short length of stay when performed at an experienced center. Radiologic recurrence is observed relatively frequently with routine surveillance; however, many of these recurrences are small, and few patients require correction of the recurrence. Furthermore, these small recurrent hernias are often asymptomatic and do not seem to be associated with the same risk of severe complications developing as the initial paraesophageal hernia.

Contemporary management of paraesophaegeal hernias: establishing a European expert consensus

BACKGROUND

The surgical treatment of paraesophageal hernias remains a challenge due to the lack of consensus regarding principles of operative treatment. The objectives of this study were to achieve consensus on key topics through expert opinion using a Delphi methodology.

METHODS

A Delphi survey combined with a face-to-face meeting was conducted. A panel of European experts in foregut surgery from high-volume centres generated items in the first survey round. In subsequent rounds, the panel rated agreement with statements on a 5-point Likert-type scale. Internal consistency (consensus) was predefined as Cronbach's α > .80. Items that >70 % of the panel either rated as irrelevant/unimportant, or relevant/important were selected as consensus items, while topics that did not reach this cut-off were termed "undecided/controversial".

RESULTS

Three survey rounds were completed: 19 experts from 10 countries completed round one, 18 continued through rounds two and three. Internal consistency was high in rounds two and three (α > .90). Fifty-eight additional/revised items derived from comments and free-text entries were included in round three. In total, 118 items were rated; consensus agreement was achieved for 70 of these. Examples of consensus topics are the relevance of the disease profile for assessing surgical urgency and complexity, the role of clinical history as the mainstay of patient follow-up, indications for revision surgery, and training and credentialing recommendations. Topics with the most "undecided/controversial" items were follow-up, postoperative care and surgical technique.

CONCLUSIONS

This Delphi study achieved expert consensus on key topics in the operative management of paraesophageal hernias, providing an overview of the current opinion among European foregut surgeons. Moreover, areas with substantial variability in opinions were identified reflecting the current lack of empirical evidence and opportunities for future research.

Hiatal hernia in pediatric patients: laparoscopic versus open approaches

PURPOSE

The aim of this study was to evaluate the surgical outcomes of laparoscopic approach for hiatal hernia (HH) in pediatric patients.

METHODS

This was a retrospective study of 33 patients younger than 18 years who underwent an operation for HH between January 1999 and December 2012.

RESULTS

The HH symptoms were various and included regurgitation, vomiting, weight loss, cough, hoarseness, and cyanosis. Among the 33 patients, there were 25 sliding types, 1 paraesophageal type, and 7 mixed types. Open surgery (OS) and laparoscopic surgery (LS) were used in 16 and 17 patients, respectively. There were no statistically significant differences in sex, age, or body weight between the groups. The median operating time was longer in the LS group (150 minutes; range, 90-250 minutes vs. 125 minutes; range, 66-194 minutes; P = 0.028). Time to oral intake was shorter in the LS group than in the OS group (1 day; range, 1-3 days vs. 2 days; range, 1-7 days; P = 0.001) and time to full feeding was shorter in the LS group than in the OS group (6 days; range, 3-16 days vs. 10 days; range, 3-33 days; P = 0.048). There were no differences in length of hospital stay and complications between the two groups. There was no perioperative mortality or recurrence of HH.

CONCLUSION

A good surgical outcome for laparoscopic correction of HH was seen in pediatric patients.

Utilization and Outcomes of Laparoscopic Versus Open Paraesophageal Hernia Repair

The optimal operative approach for repair of diaphragmatic hernia remains debated. The aim of this study was to examine the utilization of laparoscopy and compare the outcomes of laparoscopic versus open paraesophageal hernia repair performed at academic centers. Data was obtained from the University HealthSystem Consortium database on 2726 patients who underwent a laparoscopic (n = 2069) or open (n = 657) paraesophageal hernia repair between 2007 and 2010. The data were reviewed for demographics, length of stay, 30-day readmission, morbidity, in-hospital mortality, and costs. For elective procedures, utilization of laparoscopic repair was 81 per cent and was associated with a shorter hospital stay (3.7 vs 8.3 days, P < 0.01), less requirement for intensive care unit care (13% vs 35%, P < 0.01), and lower overall complications (2.7% vs 8.4%, P < 0.01), 30-day readmissions (1.4% vs 3.4%, P < 0.01) and costs ($15,227 vs $24,263, P < 0.01). The in-hospital mortality was 0.4 per cent for laparoscopic repair versus 0.0 per cent for open repair. In patients presenting with obstruction or gangrene, utilization of laparoscopic repair was 57 per cent and was similarly associated with improved outcomes compared with open repair. Within the context of academic centers, the current practice of paraesophageal hernia repair is mostly laparoscopy. Compared with open repair, laparoscopic repair was associated with superior perioperative outcomes even in cases presenting with obstruction or gangrene.

Paraoesophageal herniation: a review

BACKGROUND

Paraoesophageal hiatus herniae repair can represent a formidable challenge. Afflicted patients tend to be elderly with multiple infirmities often with cardio-pulmonary dysfunction. They may present acutely with protracted vomiting and concurrent biochemical imbalances and it is a technically demanding procedure. There are several debated issues regarding operative technique. This paper will attempt to explain the nature of paraoesophageal hiatus herniae and reviews the recommended pre-operative investigations and operative strategies available.

METHODS

A literature search was performed from Pubmed and suitable clinical papers were selected for review. When attempting to address whether meshes should be included routinely, electronic searches were performed in PubMed, Embase and the Cochrane library. A systematic search was done with the following medical subject heading (MeSH) terms: 'paraoesophageal hernia repair' AND 'mesh'. In PubMed and Embase the search was carried out with the limits 'humans', 'English language', 'all adult: 19+ years' and 'published between 1990 and 2010'. A manual cross-reference search of the bibliographies of included papers was carried out to identify additional potentially relevant studies.

RESULTS

Firm conclusions are difficult to draw due to the diverse nature of both the disorder and the presentation however principals of management can be suggested. Similarly, there is no conclusive proof of the most effective operative technique and therefore the options are described.

CONCLUSION

Due to the relative lack of cases encountered at smaller institutions, there is a good argument for centralisation of these cases into regional centres to allow research and facilitate improvements in care.

Collagen type I:III ratio of the gastroesophageal junction in patients with paraesophageal hernias

BACKGROUND

The purpose of this study was to examine the biological environment of the esophageal hiatus through analysis of the collagen content within the gastrohepatic ligament (GHL), gastrophrenic ligament (GPL), and phrenoesophageal ligament (PEL) in patients with type I hiatal hernias (HH) and type III paraesophageal hernias (PEH).

METHODS

A control group (N=10) and patients with type I HH (N=10) and type III PEH (N=10) were included in the analysis. Specimens of the GHL, PEL, and GPL were collected intraoperatively. Slides stained with sirius red/fast green were created and ten photos at 400×magnification were taken of each specimen. Axiovision 4.7 (Zeiss) photo analysis software was employed for quantification of collagen I (red) and III (green) by calculating color area (μm2). Statistical significance (p<0.05) was determined using a one-way ANOVA and Fisher's LSD post-test.

RESULTS

Cross-polarization microscopy revealed that the collagen I content was similar in the three study groups for the GHL, greater in the type III PEH group and in the control group compared to the type I HH group for the PEL, and greater in the type III PEH group compared to control group for the GPL. Collagen III quantity was greater in the control group than in the type I HH group for each ligament, and greater in the GHL and PEL when compared to the type III PEH group. Type III PEH patients had greater collagen III quantity than did type I HH patients for each ligament. Collagen type I:III ratio of the GHL was greater in both hernia groups compared to the control group. Type III PEH patients contained a higher I:III ratio than both the control and type I HH groups with respect to the PEL. There was no difference in the ratio with evaluation of the GPL for the three groups.

CONCLUSION

Evaluation of the esophageal hiatus revealed that patients with PEH have a different biological environment with regard to collagen content compared to control patients. The collagen I:III ratio of the study groups was equal to or greater than the control group. Collagen deficiency in the GE junction supporting ligaments does not appear to be an etiology of PEH formation.

Long-term symptomatic outcome and radiologic assessment of laparoscopic hiatal hernia repair

BACKGROUND

The long-term durability of laparoscopic repair of paraesophageal hiatal herniation is uncertain. This study focuses on the long-term symptomatic and radiologic outcome of laparoscopic paraesophageal herniation repair.

METHODS

Between 2000 and 2007, 70 patients (49 females, mean age +/- standard deviation 60.6 +/- 10.9 years) undergoing laparoscopic repair of paraesophageal herniation were studied prospectively. After a mean follow-up of 45.6 +/- 23.8 months, symptomatic (65 patients, 93%) and radiologic follow-up (60 patients, 86%) was performed by standardized questionnaires and esophagograms.

RESULTS

The symptomatic outcome was successful in 58 patients (89%), and gastroesophageal anatomy was intact in 42 patients (70%). The addition of a fundoplication was the only significant predictor of an unfavorable radiologic outcome in the univariate analysis (odds ratio .413; 95% confidence interval, .130 to 1.308; P = .125).

CONCLUSIONS

The long-term symptomatic outcome of laparoscopic repair of paraesophageal hiatal herniation was favorable in 89% of patients, and 70% had successful anatomic repair. The addition of a fundoplication did not prevent anatomic herniation.

A surgical emergency due to an incarcerated paraesophageal hernia

Paraesophageal hernias (PEHs) are hernias in which the gastroesophageal junction stays where it belongs (attached at the level of the diaphragm), but part of the stomach passes or bulges into the chest beside the esophagus. It represents a small proportion of all hiatal hernias. It can lead to severe complications like incarceration, volvulus, or strangulation, which are true emergencies in the emergent department (ED). Paraesophageal hernia rarely features on a list of differential diagnoses of acute chest or epigastric pain. It could be treated as myocardial insult, and the outcome could be life-threatening. Thus, it is easily missed when ED physicians did not maintain a high index of suspicion. Multislice thoracoabdominal computed tomography scan is a very useful and reliable tool for diagnosis and detecting complications. Surgical repair of PEH provide excellent outcomes and have low complication rate compared with laparoscopic approach in the literature. Correct diagnosis and treatment can prevent life-threatening complications. We reported a case of PEH with incarceration of stomach and colon with initial presentations of nonspecific epigastralgia and anterior chest pain. It highlights the challenge that noncardiac chest pain presents to the ED physician.

Technical considerations in laparoscopic fundoplication. How I do it

Gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) is a common disease and can be successfully treated by laparoscopic fundoplication. This article describes the technique of laparoscopic surgery for GERD with a focus on operative pitfalls.

Laparoscopic paraesophageal hernia repair

Paraesophageal hernias are difficult surgical problems that often need repair. Meticulous work-up and surgical technique are required for optimal results. A laparoscopic approach is associated with reduced morbidity and, if combined with the use of biologic mesh, provides relief of symptoms and a durable repair.

Laparoscopic repair of paraesophageal hernia

Laparoscopic repair of paraesophageal hernias is rapidly replacing the traditional open approach. Regardless of the approach, certain aspects of repairing paraesophageal hernias have proven to be beneficial and others remain controversial. This article addresses the effectiveness of the laparoscopic approach, the accepted and controversial technical aspects of repair, and which patients should undergo surgical correction of the hernia.

Short esophagus: literature incidence

There are controversies regarding existence and incidence of short esophagus. The authors reviewed the literature incidence of short esophagus among operated patients due to gastroesophageal reflux disease in the last 3 years. The overall incidence of short esophagus was 1.53%. The proposed risk factors (paraesophageal hernia, Barrett's esophagus, reoperation, esophageal strictures and access route) do have a higher incidence of short esophagus, with the exception of the Barrett's esophagus. Although several biases can be associated with the review, the authors identified the short esophagus incidence in the literature.

Laparoscopic paraesophageal hernia repair, a challenging operation: medium-term outcome of 116 patients

Laparoscopic paraesophageal hernia repairs performed in 116 patients between 1992 and 2001 were prospectively analyzed. Perioperative outcomes were assessed and follow-up was performed under protocol. There were 85 female and 31 male patients who had a mean (+/- SD) age of 65 +/- 13 years and an American Society of Anesthesiology score of 2.3 +/- 0.6. All but two patients underwent an antireflux procedure. Gastropexy was performed in 48 patients, an esophageal lengthening procedure in six patients, and prosthetic closure of the hiatus in six patients. Major complications occurred in five patients (4.3%) with two postoperative deaths (1.7%). Mean follow-up was 30 +/- 25 months; 96 patients (83%) have been followed for more than 6 months. Among these patients, 73 (76%) are asymptomatic, 11 (11%) have mild symptoms, and 12 (13%) take antacid medications. Protocol barium esophagograms were obtained in 69% of patients at 6 to 12 months' follow-up. Recurrence of hiatal hernia was documented in 21 patients (22% overall and in 32% of those undergoing contrast studies). Reoperation has been performed in three patients (3%). When only the patients with recurrent hiatal hernias are considered, 13 (62%) are symptomatic but only six (28%) require medication for symptoms. Laparoscopic paraesophageal hernia repair is generally safe, even in this high-risk group. This study confirms a relatively high incidence of recurrent hiatal abnormalities after paraesophageal hernia repair; however, most recurrent hiatal hernias are small and only 3% have required reoperation. Protocol esophagograms detect recurrences that are minimally symptomatic. Improved techniques must be devised to improve the long-term outcomes of laparoscopic paraesophageal hernia repair.

Paraesophageal hernias: operation or observation?

OBJECTIVE

To examine the hypothesis that elective laparoscopic repair should be routinely performed on patients with asymptomatic or minimally symptomatic paraesophageal hernias.

SUMMARY BACKGROUND DATA

The management of asymptomatic paraesophageal hernias is a controversial issue. Most surgeons believe that all paraesophageal hernias should be corrected electively on diagnosis, irrespective of symptoms, to prevent the development of complications and avoid the risk of emergency surgery.

METHODS

A Markov Monte Carlo decision analytic model was developed to track a hypothetical cohort of patients with asymptomatic or minimally symptomatic paraesophageal hernia and reflect the possible clinical outcomes associated with two treatment strategies: elective laparoscopic paraesophageal hernia repair (ELHR) or watchful waiting (WW). The input variables for ELHR were estimated from a pooled analysis of 20 published studies, while those for WW and emergency surgery were derived from the 1997 HCUP-NIS database and surgical literature published from 1964 to 2000. Outcomes for the two strategies were expressed in quality-adjusted life-years (QALYs).

RESULTS

Analysis of the HCUP-NIS database showed that published studies overestimate the mortality of emergency surgery (17% vs. 5.4%). The mortality rate of ELHR was 1.4%. The annual probability of developing acute symptoms requiring emergency surgery with the WW strategy was 1.1%. For patients 65 years of age, ELHR resulted in reduction of 0.13 QALYs (10.78 vs. 10.65) compared with WW. The model predicted that WW was the optimal treatment strategy in 83% of patients and ELHR in the remaining 17%. The model was sensitive only to alterations of the mortality rates of ELHR and emergency surgery.

CONCLUSIONS

If ELHR is routinely recommended, it would be more beneficial than WW in fewer than one of five patients. WW is a reasonable alternative for the initial management of patients with asymptomatic or minimally symptomatic paraesophageal hernias, and even if an emergency operation is required, the burden of the procedure is not as severe as was thought in the past.

Paraesophageal hernias: operation or observation?

OBJECTIVE

To examine the hypothesis that elective laparoscopic repair should be routinely performed on patients with asymptomatic or minimally symptomatic paraesophageal hernias.

SUMMARY BACKGROUND DATA

The management of asymptomatic paraesophageal hernias is a controversial issue. Most surgeons believe that all paraesophageal hernias should be corrected electively on diagnosis, irrespective of symptoms, to prevent the development of complications and avoid the risk of emergency surgery.

METHODS

A Markov Monte Carlo decision analytic model was developed to track a hypothetical cohort of patients with asymptomatic or minimally symptomatic paraesophageal hernia and reflect the possible clinical outcomes associated with two treatment strategies: elective laparoscopic paraesophageal hernia repair (ELHR) or watchful waiting (WW). The input variables for ELHR were estimated from a pooled analysis of 20 published studies, while those for WW and emergency surgery were derived from the 1997 HCUP-NIS database and surgical literature published from 1964 to 2000. Outcomes for the two strategies were expressed in quality-adjusted life-years (QALYs).

RESULTS

Analysis of the HCUP-NIS database showed that published studies overestimate the mortality of emergency surgery (17% vs. 5.4%). The mortality rate of ELHR was 1.4%. The annual probability of developing acute symptoms requiring emergency surgery with the WW strategy was 1.1%. For patients 65 years of age, ELHR resulted in reduction of 0.13 QALYs (10.78 vs. 10.65) compared with WW. The model predicted that WW was the optimal treatment strategy in 83% of patients and ELHR in the remaining 17%. The model was sensitive only to alterations of the mortality rates of ELHR and emergency surgery.

CONCLUSIONS

If ELHR is routinely recommended, it would be more beneficial than WW in fewer than one of five patients. WW is a reasonable alternative for the initial management of patients with asymptomatic or minimally symptomatic paraesophageal hernias, and even if an emergency operation is required, the burden of the procedure is not as severe as was thought in the past.

Mesh Crural Repair of Large Paraesophageal Hiatal Hernias

Surgical repair is indicated in patients with paraesophageal hernias but is associated with a high recurrence rate. Our objective was to assess the safety and efficacy of mesh reinforcement of the crural closure in laparoscopic paraesophageal hernia repair. We conducted a 7-year retrospective review of all patients undergoing laparoscopic paraesophageal hernia repair with or without use of mesh. The main outcome measures were use of mesh, reason for use, age, sex, preoperative symptoms, length of operation, length of hospital stay, postoperative complications, and long-term follow-up conducted by physician interview. Twelve patients were repaired with mesh (Group A) and 12 without (Group B). Age, sex, operating time, length of hospital stay, and postoperative complications were similar in both groups. In Group A two patients required an interposition graft and ten required mesh reinforcement of the crural closure. One Group A patient developed an early recurrence requiring a reoperation, and one Group B patient developed a gastric leak where the fundus was sutured to the crura. The remainder of the patients experienced resolution of their symptoms at 2 weeks follow-up. Long-term follow-up (average 37 months) showed one Group B patient with a recurrence of reflux symptoms, but an upper gastrointestinal study showed no recurrence of hernia. All others remained asymptomatic. We conclude that the use of mesh in laparoscopic repair of large paraesophageal hernias appears safe and may reduce recurrence.

Minimally invasive management of paraesophageal herniation in the high-risk surgical patient

BACKGROUND

Traditional management of symptomatic paraesophageal herniation involves hernia reduction, hiatal closure, and an antireflux procedure or gastropexy. Patients with significant comorbidities may not tolerate operative repair. A new technique, laparoscopic-assisted endoscopic reduction and fixation of the stomach, may provide a minimally invasive treatment alternative.

METHODS

Eleven elderly patients with symptomatic paraesophageal herniation were managed with flexible endoscopy and double percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy (PEG) tube insertion with or without laparoscopic assistance.

RESULTS

All patients presented with a symptomatic paraesophageal hernia. Mean age was 78.3 years (range 72 to 84). Each was deemed at high risk for definitive repair due to preexisting coronary artery disease as well as at least two other serious comorbidities. Hernia reduction and intra-abdominal fixation of the stomach was achieved in each case using flexible endoscopy and double PEG insertion. Laparoscopic assistance for reduction and gastropexy was utilized in 9 cases. Mean operative time was 61 minutes (range 28 to 104). Average length of stay was 2.8 days (range 0 to 12). One minor and three major postoperative complications occurred. Over a mean follow-up of 4.1 months (range 2 to 7), all patients have resumed oral intake and achieved weight gain.

CONCLUSIONS

Patients with symptomatic paraesophageal herniation require intervention to alleviate symptoms and avoid the complications of gastric incarceration. For the high-risk patient, endoscopic reduction and PEG with laparoscopic assistance appears to provide effective treatment.

Laparoscopic esophageal surgery

In its 9-year history, laparoscopic esophageal surgery has become second only to gallbladder surgery in the frequency of minimally invasive procedures performed in routine surgical practice. Laparoscopic fundoplication has assumed a central role in the surgical treatment of gastroesophageal reflux. Laparoscopic myotomy has emerged as the optimal form of therapy for achalasia, and staging laparoscopy has been identified as an important adjunct to the preoperative evaluation of esophageal and gastroesophageal junction carcinoma. Laparoscopic paraesophageal hernia repair and remedial laparoscopic antireflux surgery currently are gaining acceptance. Laparoscopic gastroplasty, esophagectomy, and diverticulectomy are undergoing clinical trials, and their roles remain to be defined.