Side effects, dropouts from treatment and cost consequences

Gastrointestinal side effects associated with antidepressant treatments in patients with major depressive disorder: A systematic review and meta-analysis

Gastrointestinal side effects (SEs) are frequently observed in patients with major depressive disorder (MDD) while taking antidepressants and may lead to treatment discontinuation. The aim of this meta-analysis is to provide quantitative measures on short-term rates of gastrointestinal SEs in MDD patients treated with second-generation antidepressants. An electronic search of the literature was conducted by using MEDLINE, ISI Web of Science - Web of Science Core Collection, and Cochrane Library databases. Eligible studies had to focus on the use of at least one of 15 antidepressants commonly used in MDD (i.e., agomelatine, bupropion, citalopram, desvenlafaxine, duloxetine, escitalopram, fluoxetine, fluvoxamine, levomilnacipran, mirtazapine, paroxetine, reboxetine, sertraline, venlafaxine, and vortioxetine) and report data on treatment-emergent gastrointestinal SEs (i.e. nausea/vomiting, diarrhoea, constipation, abdominal pain, dyspepsia, anorexia, increased appetite and dry mouth) within 12 weeks of treatment. Overall, 304 studies were included in the meta-analyses. All the considered antidepressants showed higher rates of gastrointestinal SEs than placebo. Escitalopram and sertraline were shown to be the least tolerated antidepressants on the gastrointestinal tract, being associated with all the considered SEs with the exception of constipation and increased appetite, while mirtazapine was shown to be the antidepressant with fewer side effects on the gut, being only associated with increased appetite. In conclusion, commonly used antidepressants showed different profiles of gastrointestinal SEs, possibly related to their mechanisms of action. The specific tolerability profile of each compound should be considered by clinicians when prescribing antidepressants in order to improve adherence to treatment and increase positive outcomes in patients with MDD.

The effectiveness and safety of acupuncture for depression: An overview of meta-analyses

PURPOSE

To provide an overview of existing meta-analysis (MAs) on the efficacy and safety of acupuncture for depression, and assess the methodological quality and the strength of evidence of the included MAs.

METHODS

We searched MAs of randomized trials that have evaluated the effects of acupuncture on depression in three international and three Chinese databases from their inception until August 2019. The methodological quality of included MAs was evaluated with the Assessing the Methodological Quality of Systematic Reviews 2 (AMSTAR-2), and the strength of evidence with the Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE). We used the intra-class correlation coefficient (ICC) to assess reviewer agreement in the pre-experiment.

RESULTS

We included 31 MAs and 59 RCTs. The results of included MAs were conflicting, our meta-analyses found that acupuncture may confer small benefit in reducing the severity of depression by end of treatment than no treatment/wait list/treatment as usual(SMD -0.74, 95% CI -1.06 to -0.41, eight trials, 624 participants), control acupuncture (invasive, non-invasive sham controls) (SMD 0.27, 95% CI -0.51 to -0.04, 20 trials, 1055 participants), antidepressants(Selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SSRI)/ Tetracyclic antidepressants(TCAs)) (SMD -0.28, 95% CI -0.46 to -0.10, 30 trials, 3068 participants), acupuncture plus antidepressants versus antidepressants(SSRI/TCAs) (SMD -0.99, 95% CI -1.37 to -0.61, 17 trials, 1110 participants). Subgroup analyses showed that there was no difference between electro-acupuncture and invasive control (P = 0.37), electro-acupuncture and non-invasive control (P = 0.90), manual acupuncture and Tetracyclic antidepressants (P = 0.57), electro-acupuncture and Tetracyclic antidepressants (P = 0.07). Six MAs concluded that acupuncture reduced the incidence of adverse events compared with antidepressants. The evaluation with AMSTAR-2 showed that the quality of included MAs was low or critically low. The results of the GRADE evaluation showed that the strength of evidence was low to very low for most outcomes.

CONCLUSIONS

Although acupuncture appears to be more effective and safer than no treatment, control acupuncture and antidepressants, the quality of the available evidence was very low. Further methodologically rigorous and adequately powered primary studies are needed to confirm the effectiveness of acupuncture for depression.

The Effectiveness of Acupuncture for Depression – a Systematic Review of Randomised Controlled Trials

Objective

To summarise the existing evidence on acupuncture as a therapy for depression.

Methods

RCTs were included, in which either manual acupuncture or electroacupuncture was compared with any control procedure in subjects with depression. Data were extracted independently by two authors. The methodological quality was assessed. Pre and post means and SDs for depression specific measures were extracted, when available, for meta-analysis.

Results

Seven randomised comparative trials involving 509 patients were included. The evidence is inconsistent on whether manual acupuncture is superior to sham, and suggests that acupuncture was not superior to waiting list. Evidence suggests that the effect of electroacupuncture may not be significantly different from antidepressant medication, weighted mean difference −0.43(95% CI −5.61 to 4.76). There is inconclusive evidence on whether acupuncture has an additive effect when given as an adjunct to antidepressant drugs.

Conclusion

The evidence from controlled trials is insufficient to conclude whether acupuncture is an effective treatment for depression, but justifies further trials of electroacupuncture.

Worsening Anxiety, Irritability, Insomnia, or Panic Predicts Poorer Antidepressant Treatment Outcomes: Clinical Utility and Validation of the Concise Associated Symptom Tracking (CAST) Scale

BACKGROUND

We report on the psychometric properties of the 16-item Concise Associated Symptom Tracking Scale self-report scale and its clinical utility.

METHODS

The 5-domain (irritability, anxiety, mania, insomnia, and panic) structure of Concise Associated Symptom Tracking Scale was validated with confirmatory factor analysis in Combining Medications to Enhance Depression Outcomes trial participants at baseline (n=664). Correlations with other clinical measures were used for convergent and divergent validity. In participants with at least one postbaseline visit (n=630), worsening in each Concise Associated Symptom Tracking Scale domain was defined as ≥1.28 SD increase from baseline for each visit (weeks 1, 2, 4, and 6) only. Worsening in any domain (except mania) was defined as overall worsening. Association of domain-specific and overall worsening with remission was tested with logistic regression analyses.

RESULTS

The 5-domain structure had adequate model fit on confirmatory factor analysis (GFI=0.93, CFI=0.89, and RMSEA=0.07). Scores on anxiety, panic, insomnia, and mania significantly correlated with Hamilton Rating Scale for Depression anxiety subscale (rs=0.27), Psychiatric Diagnostic Screening Questionnaire-panic scale (rs=0.35), sum of 3 Quick Inventory of Depressive Symptomatology Self-Report insomnia items (rs=0.55), and Altman Self-Rating Mania scale (rs=0.41), respectively. From baseline to week 6, 5.2%, 7.5%, 47.6%, 15.6%, 6.2%, and 27.6% participants (n=630) experienced irritability, anxiety, mania, insomnia, panic, and overall worsening, respectively. Participants with overall worsening were less likely to remit (31.6%) than those without any worsening (43.9%; odds ratio=0.53, 95% CI=0.36, 0.78).

CONCLUSION

The 16-item Concise Associated Symptom Tracking Scale self-report has acceptable psychometric properties. Clinically significant worsening of irritability, anxiety, insomnia, or panic with antidepressant treatment is associated with poorer outcomes.

Psychosocial Assessments and Outcomes in Organ Transplantation

A qualitative review was conducted to define the term psychosocial as applied to transplant patients and to summarize evidence regarding the role and impact of psychosocial assessments and outcomes across the transplant process. English-language case series and empirical studies from January 1970 through April 1990 that were abstracted in Medline and Psychological Abstracts or listed in publications' bibliographies were used as data sources. A qualitative analysis was performed to determine the depth of the case reports and whether the empirical reports obtained statistically reliable, clinically significant findings. The authors conclude that psychosocial assessments differ in content and application to candidate selection depending on the transplant program. Psychosocial status before transplant does not consistently affect medical outcomes after transplant. Psychosocial status generally improves with transplant, although difficulties are prevalent in psychological adjustment and in compliance with medical regimens. Psychiatric history can predict psychological outcomes after transplant but does not consistently predict compliance. Social supports and coping strategies strengthen psychosocial outcomes. Posttransplant psychosocial outcomes may predict physical morbidity and mortality.

A cohort study of adherence to antidepressants in primary care: the influence of antidepressant concerns and treatment preferences

OBJECTIVE

Clinical guidelines recommend that antidepressant treatment should be continued for a minimum of 6 months following response in depression and anxiety disorders. However, adherence to antidepressants is low. This prospective cohort study investigated the influence of patients' antidepressant concerns, treatment preferences, and illness perceptions on adherence to antidepressants over a 6-month period.

METHOD

A cohort of 178 patients aged 18 to 74 years and newly issued with a prescription for antidepressants to treat any condition was followed up prospectively at 5 primary care practices in Southeast England. Adherence was measured through self-report and prescription refill data. Patient perceptions were quantified using validated outcome measures, the Beliefs about Medicine Questionnaire and the Illness Perception Questionnaire, at 4 timepoints. Patient treatment preferences were recorded using a specially designed questionnaire. Data collection took place between September 2000 and May 2002.

RESULTS

Of 147 participants (83%) who completed the study, 19% persisted with antidepressants in accordance with guideline recommendations throughout the 6-month period. Specific concern about antidepressant side effects (OR = 3.30, 95% CI = 2.20 to 4.97) and general worry about taking antidepressants (OR = 1.65, 95% CI = 1.13 to 2.40) were independent predictors of antidepressant nonuse. Preference for different treatment/uncertainty about preferred treatment was also a strong predictor (OR = 3.82, 95% CI = 1.35 to 10.77). However, illness perceptions were not associated with adherence.

CONCLUSIONS

Concerns about antidepressants and a mismatch between patients' preferred and prescribed treatment act as significant barriers to sustained adherence. This study highlights the central role of the patient-physician partnership in exploring antidepressant concerns, working with treatment preferences, and providing supportive continued management. The findings may inform the development of interventions within primary care programs to enhance commitment to treatment for common mental disorders.

Acupuncture for depression and myalgia in patients with hepatitis: an observational study

BACKGROUND

Depressive symptoms and myalgia are commonly seen in patients with chronic hepatitis B and chronic hepatitis C.

OBJECTIVE

To investigate the efficacy of acupuncture treatment on depressive symptoms and myalgia in patients with hepatitis.

METHODS

Of 44 patients with hepatitis screened for depression and myalgia, 28 were enrolled and included in the study. The main outcome measure for depressive symptoms was Beck's Depression Inventory (BDI). For pain/myalgia, patients rated their pain on a scale from 0 to 10. Patients with a score greater than the cut-off point in either score were allocated to acupuncture treatment. The Chinese method of acupuncture was used. Treatment continued for 6 weeks.

RESULTS

At baseline, 17/44 patients (39%) had a BDI score ≥17 and 24 (55%) had a pain score ≥5. A total of 28 patients were allocated to acupuncture treatment, forming three groups: group 1, 13 patients with high BDI and high myalgia scores; group 2, 11 patients with low BDI score but high myalgia score; group 3, 4 patients with high BDI score but low myalgia score. Adherence to treatment was good; all patients completed the sessions and there were no drop-outs. Significant improvements in end-treatment BDI and in myalgia scores compared with baseline levels was found.

CONCLUSION

Acupuncture seems to be a promising treatment for patients with hepatitis. Further studies are warranted in large populations to establish the therapeutic role of acupuncture.

Predictors of adherence to an antidepressant medication regimen among patients diagnosed with depression in Taiwan

This study explored the predictors of medication adherence among Taiwanese people with major depression and dysthymic disorder. Previous research indicates that depressed patients vary in compliance with their medication regimen. Poor compliance reduces the therapeutic effect of medication. Self-report questionnaires were used for this cross-sectional study conducted with 181 outpatients diagnosed with major depression or dysthymic disorder. About 50% of depressed patients reported good medication adherence. The predictors of adherence were patient income, treatment efficacy, and understanding the importance of continuing medication. Professionals should use collaborative communication and cultural values clarification with depressed patients and their families to improve the awareness of illness and to increase the likelihood of medication compliance.

Adherence to the medical regimen during the first two years after lung transplantation

BACKGROUND

Despite the importance of adherence to the medical regimen for maximizing health after lung transplantation, no prospective studies report on rates or risk factors for nonadherence in this patient population. Whether adherence levels differ in lung versus other types of transplant recipients is unknown.

METHODS

A total of 178 lung recipients and a comparison group of 126 heart recipients were enrolled. Adherence in nine areas was assessed in separate patient and family caregiver interviews 2, 7, 12, 18, and 24 months posttransplant. Potential risk factors for nonadherence were obtained at the initial assessment.

RESULTS

Cumulative incidence rates of persistent nonadherence (i.e., nonadherence at > or =2 consecutive assessments) were significantly lower (P<0.05) in lung recipients than heart recipients for taking immunosuppressants (13% nonadherent vs. 21%, respectively), diet (34% vs. 56%), and smoking (1% vs. 8%). Lung recipients had significantly higher persistent nonadherence to completing blood work (28% vs. 17%) and monitoring blood pressure (70% vs. 59%). They had a high rate of spirometry nonadherence (62%; not measured in heart recipients). The groups did not differ in nonadherence to attending clinic appointments (27%), exercise (44%), or alcohol limitations (7%). In both groups, poor caregiver support and having only public insurance (e.g., Medicaid) increased nonadherence risk in all areas.

CONCLUSIONS

Lung recipients were neither uniformly better nor worse than heart recipients in adhering to their regimen. Lung recipients have particular difficulty with some home monitoring activities. Strategies to maximize adherence in both groups should build on caregiver support and on strengthening financial resources for patient healthcare requirements.

Polymorphisms in the CYP 2D6 gene: association with plasma concentrations of fluoxetine and paroxetine

Most antidepressants are metabolized by cytochrome P450 (CYP) 2D6, and it is well known that there may be significant interindividual variation in the capacity to metabolize xenobiotics. About 7 to 10% of whites are poor metabolisers (PM), and, on the contrary, about 5% are ultrarapid metabolizers (UM), inducing very different rates in the transformation of antidepressants extensively metabolized by CYP 2D6. CYP 2D6 polymorphism can be a potential risk factor for the development of side effects or a reason for the poor efficacy of the treatment. Various probe drugs may be used for phenotyping CYP 2D6, but genotyping is now available using leukocyte DNA and is independent of concomitant drug use. In this study, we used PCR-based methods for the identification of CYP 2D6 genotypes in 49 patients receiving standard doses of fluoxetine or paroxetine and found that plasma concentration of the antidepressant drugs was significantly correlated with genetic status. In one patient who displayed CYP 2D6 gene duplication (UM), paroxetine plasma concentration was extremely low. In PM fluoxetine-treated patients, drug plasma concentration was significantly higher than that seen in extensive metabolizers.

Considerations in the management of the patient with comorbid depression and anxiety

PURPOSE

To provide clinicians with guidelines for the assessment, evaluation, diagnosis, and management of comorbid depression and anxiety in the primary care setting.

DATA SOURCES

Research-based articles in the medical and psychiatric literature, literature reviews by experts in the field, and DSM-IV-TR.

CONCLUSIONS

Comorbid anxiety and depression occurs at a high rate in primary care, and is costly to both the individual and to society. These patients most often present in primary care settings, have more severe symptoms, and require more health care resources. The presentation of depression and anxiety together pose complicated diagnostic and treatment challenges, leading to inadequate diagnosis and treatment resulting in unnecessary patient distress and increased utilization of health care services.

IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE

This article is a review of comorbid depression and anxiety with a focus upon societal and patient significance and impact, under recognition and under treatment, diagnostic challenges, medical comorbidity, treatment considerations, and educational strategies. Effective assessment, evaluation, diagnosis and treatment can lead to better treatment outcomes and improved quality of life in primary care patients.

Early drop-outs, late drop-outs and completers: differences in the continuation phase of a clinical trial

OBJECTIVE

The purpose of this study was to assess the differences between early (EDs), late drop-outs (LDs) and completers in the continuation phase of a clinical trial.

METHODS

The authors studied 119 outpatients who were treatment responders in an 8-week open trial with fluoxetine 20 mg/day, and who were then enrolled in a 26-week clinical trial comparing the efficacy of fluoxetine versus fluoxetine and cognitive behavior therapy (CBT). Patients were assessed using the Structured Clinical Interview for DSM-III-R-Axis I (SCID-Patient Edition), Hamilton Depression Rating Scale (HAMD-17) and the following self-rated scales: Beck Depression Inventory (BDI), Beck Hopelessness Scale (BHS), Anxiety Sensitivity Index (ASI) and the Symptom Questionnaire (SQ) prior to starting the 26-week continuation phase. We defined 'EDs' as patients who dropped out either at or prior to Visit 2 (which was at 2 months into the 6-month continuation phase); those dropping out at Visit 3 or later were defined as 'LDs' (ED < or = 2 months and LD > 2 months). The Kruskal-Wallis and the Mann-Whitney U tests were used for data analysis.

RESULTS

Of the 119 outpatients, 83 were completers (mean age: 42.1 +/- 9.0 years, 46 [55%] women, age of onset of major depressive disorder [MDD] = 24.3 +/- 12.5 years), 11 were EDs (mean age: 38.1 +/- 13.0 years, 4 [36%] women, age of onset of MDD = 22.0 +/- 11.1 years) and 25 were LDs (mean age: 35.2 +/- 10.4 years, 12 [48%] women, age of onset of MDD = 24.6 +/- 11.6 years). LDs were significantly younger than completers (P<.01). There was no significant difference in age between EDs and LDs, nor between EDs and completers. EDs and completers were depressed for a longer period of time compared to LDs (P<.05). EDs also had significantly greater overall impairment in social adjustment compared to completers (P<.05).

CONCLUSIONS

Our data suggest that LDs are significantly younger than completers, although age is not a predictor between EDs and LDs. Further, EDs and completers are depressed for a longer duration than LDs, and EDs have significantly greater social impairment compared to completers. Our study identified some patient characteristics significantly associated with dropping out of a long-term clinical trial.

Early drop-outs, late drop-outs and completers: differences in the continuation phase of a clinical trial

OBJECTIVE

The purpose of this study was to assess the differences between early and late drop-outs and completers in the continuation phase of a clinical trial.

METHODS

The authors studied 119 outpatients who were treatment responders in an 8-week open trial with fluoxetine 20 mg/day, and who were then enrolled in a 26-week clinical trial comparing the efficacy of fluoxetine versus fluoxetine and cognitive behavior therapy (CBT). Patients were assessed using the Structured Clinical Interview for DSM-III-R--Axis I (SCID-Patient Edition), Hamilton Depression Rating Scale (HAMD-17) and the following self-rated scales: Beck Depression Inventory (BDI), Beck Hopelessness Scale (BHS), Anxiety Sensitivity Index (ASI) and the Symptom Questionnaire (SQ) prior to starting the 26-week continuation phase. We defined "early drop-outs" (EDs) as patients who dropped out either at or prior to Visit 2 (which was at 2 months into the 6-month continuation phase); those dropping out at Visit 3 or later were defined as "late drop-outs" (LDs) (ED < or = 2 months; LD >2 months). The Kruskal-Wallis and the Mann-Whitney U tests were used for data analysis.

RESULTS

Of the 119 patients, 83 were completers (mean age: 42.1+/-9.0 years; 46 [55%] women; age of onset of major depressive disorder [MDD] = 24.3+/-12.5 years), II were EDs (mean age: 38.1 + 13.0 years: 4 [36%] women; age of onset of MDD = 22.0+/-11.1 years) and 25 were LDs (mean age: 35.2+/-10.4 years; 12 [48%] women; age of onset of MDD = 24.6+/-11.6 years). LDs were significantly younger than completers (P<.01). There was no significant difference in age between EDs and LDs, nor between EDs and completers. EDs were more likely to have been depressed for a longer period of time compared to LDs (P< .05). EDs completers were depressed for a longer period of time compared to LDs (P< .05).

CONCLUSIONS

Our data suggest that late drop-outs are significantly younger than completers, although age is not a predictor between early drop-outs and late drop-outs. Further, early drop-outs are depressed for a longer duration compared to late drop-outs completers are depressed for a longer duration than late dropouts, and Early drop-outs have significantly more social impairment compared to completers. Our study identified some patient characteristics significantly associated with dropping out of a long-term clinical trial.

Depression and education as predicting factors for completion of a behavioral medicine intervention in a mind/body medicine clinic

The authors compared characteristics of 1,012 outpatients completing a 10-week behavioral medicine intervention with 300 outpatients who dropped out. They administered the Symptom Checklist-90 Revised (SCL-90R) before and after the program. Patients who completed the treatment, compared with dropouts, tended to be more highly educated, married, and gainfully employed. Their pretreatment scores on the SCL-90R were significantly lower than those of the dropouts on somatization, depression, and obsessive-compulsive scales and on the global severity index. Multiple logistic regression analysis indicated that lower depression and higher education marked the group who completed the intervention in contrast to the dropouts. After the intervention, all of the SCL-90R scores were significantly lower among patients who completed the treatment. Pre- to postintervention score changes were not significantly associated with the number of sessions attended. The findings suggest that the intervention had salutary effects in patients with mind/body distress and that its effectiveness was not diminished by a few absences. Depressed or less educated patients might benefit from preparatory interventions or from a modified approach to their treatment.

Antidepressant use in clinical practice: efficacy v. effectiveness

BACKGROUND

Although the efficacy of antidepressants has been demonstrated in randomised, controlled clinical trials, it is how an antidepressant is used in clinical practice that determines its clinical effectiveness, or real-world efficacy.

AIMS

To explore the frequency with which antidepressants are used at adequate dose and duration to obtain remission of symptoms and prevent relapse in clinical practice and discuss potential implications for clinical outcomes.

METHOD

Studies of antidepressant prescribing were reviewed and comparisons made between antidepressant classes and individual compounds within those classes.

RESULTS

Naturalistic studies show that patients who begin therapy on tricyclic antidepressants often receive sub-therapeutic doses for inadequate duration; conversely, patients who begin therapy on selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors more often receive an adequate dose of therapy for a longer duration. CONCLUSIONS; How antidepressants are used in clinical practice can determine the clinical outcomes that are achieved. Antidepressants that are more forgiving of sub-optimal prescribing and use patterns by providers and patients, respectively, may help to improve real-world efficacy.

Paroxetine versus nortriptyline in the continuation and maintenance treatment of depression in the elderly

Elderly depressed patients are vulnerable to recurrence of depression and benefit from long-term antidepressant therapy. Physicians increasingly use selective serotonin re-uptake inhibitors (SSRIs) as maintenance therapy, although in the absence of data showing that SSRIs are as efficacious as tricyclic antidepressants (TCAs) in the prevention of depression relapse and recurrence. Our objective was to evaluate, in an open trial, the efficacy of paroxetine versus nortriptyline for preventing recurrence of depression in the elderly. Elderly patients with major depression were randomly assigned in a double-blinded fashion to receive either paroxetine or nortriptyline for the acute treatment of depression. Patients who did not respond or tolerate their assigned medications were crossed over openly to the comparator agent. Patients whose depression remitted continued antidepressant medication (paroxetine n = 38; nortriptyline n = 21) during an open 18-month follow-up study. We examined the rates of and times to relapse and to termination of treatment for any reason. Paroxetine (PX) and nortriptyline (NT) patients had similar rates of relapse (16% vs. 10%, respectively) and time to relapse (60.3 weeks vs. 58.8 weeks, respectively) over 18 months. A lower burden of residual depressive symptoms and side effects during continuation and maintenance treatment was evident in nortriptyline-treated patients. Paroxetine and nortriptyline demonstrated similar efficacy in relapse and recurrence prevention in elderly depressed patients over an 18-month period.

Relationship between clinical effects, serum drug concentration, and concurrent drug interactions in depressed patients treated with citalopram, fluoxetine, clomipramine, paroxetine or venlafaxine

The relationship between clinical effects and plasma concentrations of citalopram, fluoxetine, clomipramine, paroxetine and venlafaxine was studied in 119 cases of major depression. Clinical effects were evaluated using the Clinical Global Impression (CGI) improvement scale. Antidepressants were quantified by a separative chromatographic methodology. Plasma concentrations in responder patients were compared with the plasma concentrations proposed in literature as effective values. We found that the usual therapeutic window is convenient for citalopram and clomipramine, but could be reduced for fluoxetine and increased for venlafaxine and paroxetine. Concurrent drug interactions were also evaluated and clomipramine or citalopram plasma levels were found to be influenced by the presence of associated drugs. A larger study is needed, taking into account not only plasma concentrations and clinical effects, but also some pharmacokinetic data, especially the metabolic activity characterising the patient, and the presence or not of associated drugs. Copyright 2000 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

Human factors issues in ventricular assist device recipients and their family caregivers

Ultimately, for ventricular assist devices (VADs) to be acceptable as permanent alternatives to heart transplantation, patients' and their families' satisfaction with specific features and risks of VADs must be addressed. Of 42 eligible patients who received VADs between February of 1996 and December of 1998, we interviewed 37 patients (17 Novacor, 18 Thoratec, 2 with both devices) and 20 of their primary family caregivers about device related concerns and reactions. Demographic and health related correlates of respondents' concerns were examined. Eleven patients discharged from the hospital with the VAD in place were then reinterviewed 1 month after discharge. At baseline, patients' general perceptions of the VAD were positive, although 22-52% reported specific concerns, including most often worry about infection (52%), difficulty sleeping due to the position of the driveline (52%), pain at the driveline exit site (46%), worry about device malfunction (40%), and being bothered during the day by device noise (32%). The prevalence of most concerns rose with duration of VAD support. Caregivers' perceptions did not differ significantly from patients' perceptions. Outpatients were somewhat more concerned than inpatients about device noise and risk of stroke, but were markedly less concerned about infection. Across all patients, higher levels of device related concerns were correlated with more physical functional limitations and more psychological distress, and reduced quality of life. Demographic characteristics and device type were not uniformly related to device concerns.