Psychotropic drug use in Italy, 1984-99: the impact of a change in reimbursement status

Antidepressants use in Italy: an ecological study of national and regional trends and associated factors

The present study aimed to (1) provide an update on trends in AD consumption both at the national and regional unit of analysis for the period 2000-2020 in Italy and (2) analyze sociodemographic and healthcare system-related factors associated with AD prescribing at the regional-population level between 2000 and 2019. Data were extracted from reports of the Italian Medicines Agency and databases of the Italian National Institute of Statistics. Linear regression and mixed models were applied to analyze trends in AD use (DDD/1000/day) and ecological factors associated with AD prescribing. Between 2000 and 2010 AD prescription rates constantly increased. Thereafter they stabilized until 2017 when a positive trend began again. There was a positive ecological association between AD prescribing and rates of hospital discharge due to affective disorders, antibiotics prescribing, public non-drug healthcare spending per capita, and Northern regions compared to Southern regions. AD consumption increased massively during the 2000s, flattened during the 2010s but thereafter increased again until 2020. The ecological correlation between healthcare provision/spending and AD consumption suggests that health-economic factors may play an important role.

General practitioners' concepts on issuing out-of-pocket prescriptions for hypnotics and sedatives in Germany

BACKGROUND

In Germany, almost 50% of prescriptions for benzodiazepines and drugs as Zolpidem and Zopiclone are as out-of-pocket (OOP) prescriptions-requiring patients to buy the drug at their own expense-although almost 90% of the population has statutory health insurance covering medication costs.

OBJECTIVE

To understand why general practitioners (GPs) choose this prescribing method since needed medications are insurance covered, and unnecessary drugs should not be prescribed at all.

METHODS

In this qualitative study, 17 semi-structured interviews with GPs were conducted, audio recorded and transcribed verbatim. Transcripts were analysed with grounded theory to extract a model explaining the described behaviour.

RESULTS

Knowing the significant medical risks and insecurity about regulations makes GPs wish to avoid hypnotics and sedatives. They achieve this by 'Creating a barrier' (central phenomenon) and employing the strategy 'Using an out-of-pocket prescription', which not only generates costs for the patient but also reduces the physicians´ legal and financial accountability. The perceived patient type, expected problem duration and diagnosis influence the decision about the prescription form: patients with an alcohol or drug addiction or those with 'uncomplicated' insomnia are more likely to receive an OOP prescription. Patients with any psychiatric diagnosis will likely receive a statutory health insurance prescription.

DISCUSSION

Current regulations do not provide guidance to GPs regarding hypnotics and sedatives. A clear regulatory framework and guidelines could possibly reduce physicians' defensive attitudes about these drugs and their use of OOP prescriptions. The approach to use OOP prescriptions as a barrier to reduce patients' medication use lacks evidence regarding effectiveness.

Effect of reimbursement restriction policy on the use of benzodiazepines in the Netherlands: an interrupted time series analysis

OBJECTIVES

Use of benzodiazepines has health risks. Reimbursement was restricted in the Netherlands from January 2009 onwards with the goal to reduce chronic use and healthcare expenditures. The aim of this study is to assess the initial and long-term effects of this policy on benzodiazepine use.

DESIGN

Interrupted time series analysis, segmented regression models, Kaplan-Meier survival analysis and Cox proportional hazards analysis.

SETTING

A 10% random sample of benzodiazepine dispensings by outpatient pharmacies between January 2002 and August 2015 were obtained from the PHARMO database. This database covered a catchment area representing about 3.6 million residents in 2015.

PARTICIPANTS

2 500 800 benzodiazepine prescriptions from 128 603 patients were included.

INTERVENTION

Reimbursement restriction policy from January 2009 onwards.

OUTCOME MEASURES

Changes in: the volume of dispensed prescriptions and doses, the incidence, prevalence of incidental, regular and chronic use and discontinuation rates of benzodiazepines.

RESULTS

The volume of dispensed prescriptions and doses decreased by 12.5% (95% CI 9.0% to 15.9%) and 15.1% (95% CI 11.4% to 17.3%) respectively in January 2009 compared with December 2008. A clear initial effect on the overall incidence (-14.7%; 95% CI -19.8% to 9.6%) and the prevalence of incidental (-17.8%; 95% CI -23.9% to 11.7%), regular (-20.0%; 95% CI -26.1% to 13.9%) and chronic (-16.0%; 95% CI -23.1% to 8.9%) use was observed. A statistically significant reduction in the monthly trend per 1000 medication users was observed for the overall incidence (-0.017; 95% CI -0.031 to 0.003) and the prevalence of incidental (-3.624; 95% CI -4.996 to 2.252) but not for regular (-0.304; 95% CI -1.204 to 0.596) and chronic (0.136; 95% CI -0.858 to 1.130) use. Patients who started treatment before policy had a slightly higher probability of discontinuation (HR=1.013; 95% CI 1.004 to 1.022).

CONCLUSIONS

The reimbursement policy had a significant initial effect on the volume, incidence and prevalence of benzodiazepine use. In addition, there is a statistically significant reduction in the monthly trend of overall incidence and of the prevalence of incidental use. No statistically significant reduction in the monthly trend of chronic use, the main purpose of the reimbursement restriction, could be demonstrated.

Impact of a Restriction in Reimbursement on Proton Pump Inhibitors in Patients with an Increased Risk of Gastric Complications

Governments have several options to reduce the increasing costs of health care, including restrictions for the reimbursement of medicines. Next to the intended effect of reduced costs for medicines, reimbursement restriction can have unintended effects such as patients refraining from their treatment which may lead to health problems and increased use of health care. An example of a reimbursement restriction is the one for proton pump inhibitors (PPIs) that became effective in the Netherlands in January 2012. A major unintended effect of this measure could be that high-risk patients who start with non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) or low-dose aspirin (aspirin) and who have an increased risk of gastric complications for which they are prescribed PPIs refrain from this PPI treatment. The aim of this study was to evaluate the effect of the reimbursement restriction among high-risk users of NSAIDs or aspirin. Do these patients refrain from their PPI treatment and if so do they have an increased risk of gastric complications? Part of the patients starting with NSAIDs or aspirin have an increased risk of gastric complications due to their age, comorbidities, or co-medication. The incidence of PPI use during the 2 years before the reimbursement restriction (2010 and 2011) and 2 years after the introduction of the reimbursement restriction was compared for patients on NSAIDs or aspirin with an increased risk of developing gastric complications. Impact of age, sex, and social economic status (SES) was taken into account. Hospital admissions due to gastric complications were studied over the same period (2010–2013). Data were obtained from a large population-based primary care database and a hospital database. The use of PPIs in patients with an increased risk of gastric complications who started NSAID/aspirin increased from 40% in 2010 to 55% in 2013. No impact was found of age, sex, or SES. There was no increase in hospital admissions due to gastric complications after the reimbursement restriction. The reimbursement restriction on PPIs was not associated with any detectable unintended effects for patients with an increased risk of gastric complications.

Use of psychotropic drugs in Lombardy in time of economic crisis (2007-2011): a population-based study of adult employees

Over years, there has been an increase in the prescription of psychotropic drugs (PDs), particularly antidepressants (ADs). The aim of the study was to evaluate the consumption of PDs in adult employees in a productive area of Italy and the possible changes induced by the "economic crisis". The study is a retrospective survey in all adult employees in Lombardy, Northern Italy, aged >18 years in the period 2007-2011, classified by gender, age class, nationality, education and province. During the 5-year period, there were 3,554,860 employed adults in Lombardy, of whom 277,865 (7.8%) used PDs. The use of PDs (particularly ADs) was associated with being an Italian woman aged >55 years with a basic education, a blue collar job, and an unstable working position. In 39% of cases, the use of PDs was limited to one trimester. The increase in the number of prescriptions of PDs after the economic crisis was the same as before it. The increase in PD use can be attributed more to ADs and anti-epileptic drugs with anxiolytic properties. Although continuously increasing, the use of AD fluctuated and was greater during the fall and winter. The increase involved all the provinces in Lombardy in a similar manner.

Impact of pharmaceutical policy interventions on utilization of antipsychotic medicines in Finland and Portugal in times of economic recession: interrupted time series analyses

Objectives

To analyze the impacts of pharmaceutical sector policies implemented to contain country spending during the economic recession – a reference price system in Finland and a mix of policies including changes in reimbursement rates, a generic promotion campaign and discounts granted to the public payer in Portugal – on utilization of, as a proxy for access to, antipsychotic medicines.

Methodology

We obtained monthly IMS Health sales data in standard units of antipsychotic medicines in Portugal and Finland for the period January 2007 to December 2011. We used an interrupted time series design to estimate changes in overall use and generic market shares by comparing pre-policy and post-policy levels and trends.

Results

Both countries’ policy approaches were associated with slight, likely unintended, decreases in overall use of antipsychotic medicines and with increases in generic market shares of major antipsychotic products. In Finland, quetiapine and risperidone generic market shares increased substantially (estimates one year post-policy compared to before, quetiapine: 6.80% [3.92%, 9.68%]; risperidone: 11.13% [6.79%, 15.48%]. The policy interventions in Portugal resulted in a substantially increased generic market share for amisulpride (estimate one year post-policy compared to before: 22.95% [21.01%, 24.90%]; generic risperidone already dominated the market prior to the policy interventions.

Conclusions

Different policy approaches to contain pharmaceutical expenditures in times of the economic recession in Finland and Portugal had intended – increased use of generics – and likely unintended – slightly decreased overall sales, possibly consistent with decreased access to needed medicines – impacts. These findings highlight the importance of monitoring and evaluating the effects of pharmaceutical policy interventions on use of medicines and health outcomes.

Cost-effectiveness comparisons between antidepressant treatments in depression: evidence from database analyses and prospective studies

BACKGROUND

Knowledge regarding the relative cost-effectiveness of different antidepressants is crucial for the planning of depression treatment. However, there have been only a small number of reviews of such evidence and synthesizing economic evidence across studies is methodologically challenging. In particular, there have been few reviews of the methods employed in database analyses (studies that use data from real-world practice).

METHODS

Published economic evaluations based on database analyses were systematically reviewed to compare antidepressant treatments in depression. Prospective studies of cost-effectiveness were also reviewed to highlight unanswered questions through comparisons between these two different study designs.

RESULTS

Forty papers met the criteria and were included. A relatively large number of industry-sponsored evaluations of escitalopram were identified and these found escitalopram to be potentially cost-effective in depression treatment. Evidence of cost-effectiveness differences between other individual SSRIs was not unequivocally established. Inconsistent findings further emerged concerning the cost-effectiveness of SSRIs versus TCAs between retrospective database analyses and prospective studies.

LIMITATIONS

Different outcome measures and cost perspectives make it difficult to make comparisons across studies.

CONCLUSIONS

Evidence regarding the cost-effectiveness of different antidepressants in depression continues to accumulate. Beyond the efficacy or tolerability data found for newer antidepressants in controlled trials, further research from real-world settings is needed to examine the relative cost-effectiveness of different antidepressant agents.

Reimbursement restriction and moderate decrease in benzodiazepine use in general practice

PURPOSE

To limit misuse and save costs, on January 1, 2009, benzodiazepines were excluded from the Dutch reimbursement list when used as anxiolytic, hypnotic, or sedative. This study aims to assess the impact of this reimbursement restriction on benzodiazepine use in patients with newly diagnosed anxiety or sleeping disorder in general practice.

METHODS

Was conducted a retrospective observational database study deriving data on diagnoses and prescriptions from the electronic health records-based Netherlands Information Network of General Practice (LINH). We looked for patients aged 18 years and older with an incident diagnosis of sleeping disturbance (International Classification of Primary Care code: P06) or anxiety (P74, P01) between January 2008 and December 2009. Incidence of these diagnoses, benzodiazepine use, and initiation of selective serotonin reuptake inhibitor (SSRI) treatment was compared between 2008 and 2009.

RESULTS

In total, we identified 13,596 patients with an incident diagnosis of anxiety (3,769 in 2008 and 3,710 in 2009) or sleeping disorder (3,254 in 2008 and 2,863 in 2009). The proportion of patients being prescribed a benzodiazepine after a diagnosis was lower in 2009 than in 2008 for both anxiety (30.1% vs. 33.7% P < .05) and sleeping disorder (59.1% vs. 67.0%, P < .05), as was the proportion of patients with more than 1 benzodiazepine prescription for both anxiety (36.4% vs. 42.6%, P < .05) and sleeping disorder (35.0% vs. 42.6%, P < .05). We found no increase in the use of alternative treatment for anxiety with SSRIs.

CONCLUSIONS

The reimbursement restriction has led to a moderate decrease in the number of incident diagnoses and initiation of benzodiazepine use in patients with newly diagnosed anxiety or sleeping disorder. This finding indicates that in settings where no such reimbursement opportunities exist, physicians have room to reduce benzodiazepine prescribing.

Prevalence, incidence and persistence of antipsychotic drug prescribing in the Italian general population: retrospective database analysis, 1999-2002

PURPOSE

To investigate the prevalence, incidence and persistence with antipsychotic drug therapy in a large and geographically defined catchment area of Italian general population.

METHODS

All antipsychotic drug prescriptions dispensed during 1999, 2000, 2001 and 2002 were extracted from an administrative prescription database covering a population of 2 640 379 individuals. Antipsychotic drug users were defined as patients who had at least one recorded prescription in the current year. New users were defined as patients receiving a first prescription without any recorded antipsychotic drug treatment in the previous 12 months. Prevalence data were calculated by dividing users by the total number of male and female residents in each age group. Incidence data were calculated as the number of new users divided by the person-time free from antipsychotic drugs in the current year. The cumulative persistence of each medication was calculated by dividing the total prescribed amount of antipsychotic drug by the recommended daily dose, according to each agent's defined daily dose (DDD).

RESULTS

A progressive rise in prevalence and incidence rates was observed during the 4-year period. In each census year, the prevalence and incidence of prescribing was higher in females than males, and progressively rose with age, with the highest rates in old and very old subjects. The analysis of persistence with therapy revealed that 3176 individuals (78.5%) were occasional antipsychotic drug users, and that occasional use was more frequent among individuals receiving conventional antipsychotic drugs than among individuals receiving novel antipsychotic drugs. This difference was not explained by differences in the occurrence of neurologic adverse reactions, as shown by the concurrent prescribing of anticholinergic drugs, which was fairly similar between the two groups of new drug users. Additionally, we found that conventioal antipsychotic drugs were more often used in older individuals, where occasional use is very frequent, while novel antipsychotic drugs were more often prescribed in young and adult individuals, where regular use is more frequent.

CONCLUSIONS

An epidemiologically relevant proportion of everyday individuals is annually exposed to antipsychotic drugs. The distribution of prevalence and incidence rates by age highlighted an emerging public health issue related to the adverse and beneficial consequences of antipsychotic drug exposure in the elderly. The finding that persistence with therapy was longer in new users of novel antipsychotic drugs compared with new users of conventional agents might be explained by the different demographic and clinical characteristics of individuals receiving these two drug classes and not by the different tolerability profile of these two drug classes.

Antipsychotic use in the elderly: shifting trends and increasing costs

OBJECTIVE

The purpose of this study was to assess trends in utilization and costs of antipsychotic drugs among a population of older adults over time, with respect to the prevalence of users, shifts in prescribing patterns, and related financial implications.

DESIGN

Cross-sectional time series of quarterly and annual antipsychotic utilization and cost were obtained from administrative databases for calendar years 1993 through 2002.

SETTING AND PARTICIPANTS

A population-based study of more than 1.4 million residents of the province of Ontario aged 65 years or older.

MEASUREMENTS

Data sources used included the Ontario Drug Benefits (ODB) database and Statistics Canada census data.

RESULTS

The prevalence of antipsychotic users increased by 34.8% over the study period from 2.2% at the beginning of 1993 to 3.0% of the elderly at the end of 2002 (p < 0.01). This was associated with a 749% increase in total cost (from $3.7 million in 1993 to $31.4 million in 2002; p < 0.01). The atypical antipsychotics, which were not available in 1993, made up 82.5% of the antipsychotics dispensed and 95.2% of costs in 2002.

CONCLUSIONS

The modest increase in antipsychotic prevalence in the elderly over the last ten years has been associated with a substantial increase in cost, with a significant shift towards use of the atypical antipsychotics. As the atypical antipsychotics are increasingly used for patients with dementia, which is becoming more prevalent in the aging population, an understanding of the benefits of these medications must be balanced with a detailed understanding of the material and financial implications.

Drug treatment modalities in psychiatric inpatient practice: a 20-year comparison

OBJECTIVES

The present study investigated whether the increased number of psychotropic agents available in Italy in the last 20 years increased the proportion of inpatients being treated with individual medication classes and the proportion receiving combined treatments with agents of the same class or of different classes.

METHODS

This study was conducted in South-Verona, Italy. From the local Psychiatric Case Register (PCR) all patients consecutively admitted to the inpatient unit during the years 1981/1982, 1991/92 and 2001/02 were extracted. Drug use at discharge was derived from clinical records, while service use data were extracted from the PCR.

RESULTS

During the six years surveyed 160 patients were admitted in 1981/82, 139 in 1991/92 and 228 in 2001/02. An increasing proportion of subjects receiving antipsychotic, antidepressant and benzodiazepine treatment at discharge was observed. In addition, we found an increasing proportion of patients receiving two or more psychotropic drugs at discharge, which accounted for almost 80% of cases in 2001/02. The number of psychotropic agents prescribed at hospital discharge was positively correlated with the total consumption of psychotropic drugs. A relevant proportion of patients were also dispensed agents for medical conditions, yielding an average number of 3.2 prescriptions in 2001/02. The Lavik score, a summary index of service use, indicated that subjects admitted in 1981/82 were moderate users of psychiatric services, while those admitted in 1991/92 and in 2001/02 were high users of psychiatric services.

CONCLUSION

This study documented emerging trends toward polypharmacotherapy and higher total doses. Additional pharmacoepidemiological research is needed to clarify both the beneficial and, potentially, adverse effects associated with these trends in psychiatric pharmacotherapy.

Antidepressant drug prescribing among elderly subjects: a population-based study

BACKGROUND

The patterns of antidepressant drug prescribing have rarely been studied in large and geographically defined populations of elderly subjects. In the present study we examined the prevalence and distribution of antidepressant prescribing in Lombardy, a northern Italy region with more than one and a half million elderly inhabitants.

METHODS

We used the Regional Administrative Database of Lombardy. This database includes all prescriptions reimbursed by the National Health System in the population living in this region. All antidepressant prescriptions dispensed to subjects aged 65 years or above during 2001 were extracted and prevalence data calculated by dividing antidepressant users by the total number of male and female residents in each age group.

RESULTS

During the 12 months surveyed 153,706 subjects were dispensed one or more prescriptions of antidepressants, yielding a prevalence of use of 9.49 subjects per 100 inhabitants (95% confidence interval 9.44, 9.53). Although the proportion of chronic users slightly decreased with age, more than 35% of those older that 85 years were moderate or chronic antidepressant users. General practitioners issued the majority of antidepressant prescriptions, and most antidepressant users were also dispensed agents for medical disorders.

CONCLUSIONS

The very high rates of antidepressant drug prescribing detected in late life suggest the need of characterising these subjects in terms of medical and psychiatric characteristics, needs and quality of life. It also suggests the need for pragmatic clinical trials, carried out in the general practice, with the aim of assessing whether antidepressants are effective in these conditions.

Prescription of psychotropic drugs to patients with schizophrenia: an Italian national survey

OBJECTIVES

This study aims to: (a) describe the type and doses of psychotropic drugs received by outpatients with schizophrenia in Italy; (b) explore the relationship between prescription and patients' clinical conditions, disability and socio-demographic characteristics; and (c) estimate the percentage of patients receiving polypharmacy and antipsychotics within the official recommended ranges.

METHODS

A total of 682 patients with schizophrenia were consecutively recruited in 30 Italian mental health departments, randomly selected taking into account the geographic location and population density of their catchment areas.

RESULTS

Of the sample, 98% were in treatment with neuroleptics, 47% received benzodiazepines, 25% were on anticholinergics, 10% were prescribed antidepressants and 8% were on mood stabilisers. Polypharmacy was found in 29% of the sample. Patients treated with one neuroleptic received this within therapeutic doses in 77% of cases. In patients who received two neuroleptics (24%), the former was prescribed within the official range in 71% of cases and the latter in 46%. Polytherapy was more frequently prescribed in patients treated with typicals (60% versus 34%) and in those who also received benzodiazepines (61% versus 41%) and anticholinergics (44% versus 16%). Patients in treatment with atypicals (45%) were mainly younger and lived in highly populated areas. Depot medications (25%) were more frequently prescribed to patients living in areas of low population density, who were older and who had a lower educational level, a longer duration of illness and milder anxiety/depression symptoms.

CONCLUSIONS

The consistent percentage of patients receiving polypharmacy and neuroleptics outside the therapeutic doses highlights the need to promote interventions aimed at increasing a rational use of psychotropic drugs among mental health professionals.

Impact of regulatory changes on first- and second-generation antipsychotic drug consumption and expenditure in Italy

BACKGROUND

In 1994 a change in drug reimbursement status was implemented in Italy according to cost-effectiveness criteria. The aim of this study was to examine the impact of these changes on the use of antipsychotic (AP) drugs.

METHODS

Data concerning actual quantities of antipsychotic agents dispensed in Italy from 1995 to June 2003 were obtained from the Italian Ministry of Health. For each antipsychotic agent, the number of defined daily doses (DDDs) per 1,000 inhabitants per day was calculated, as well as the annual expenditure in Euros.

RESULTS

From 1995 to June 2003 prescriptions for first-generation antipsychotic agents (FGAs) progressively decreased from 2.54 to 2.0 DDD/1,000/day; in contrast, prescriptions for second-generation antipsychotic agents (SGAs) progressively rose up to 1.75 DDD/1,000/day in 2003. Overall, from 1995 to 2003 antipsychotic prescriptions rose from 2.54 to 3.75 DDD/1,000/day. In 2003 the antipsychotic drug most frequently used was haloperidol, followed by olanzapine and risperidone. In 2003 the use of SGAs accounted for nearly 50% of overall DDD/1,000/day of AP agents. The cost of these new drugs, however, accounted for more than 80% of the total AP expenditure.

CONCLUSIONS

In Italy, the progressive increase in the utilisation of SGAs has been accompanied by a moderate decrease in the utilisation of phenothiazines and by an almost constant use of butyrophenones. The policy of reimbursing the use of SGAs only in subjects who could not tolerate FGAs eventually failed to significantly affect the pattern of antipsychotic consumption and expenditure; moreover, when this policy was eliminated at the beginning of 2001, the pattern of consumption and expenditure did not change.

Antipsychotic drug prescribing in the elderly is cause for concern

Despite most studies of antipsychotic efficacy and safety having been conducted in young patients with schizophrenia, antipsychotic agents are often prescribed in elderly subjects with psychotic symptoms. The aim of this study was to document and describe the level of antipsychotic exposure among elderly subjects. We used the Regional Administrative Database of Lombardy, a region of northern Italy with more than 1.6 million elderly inhabitants, to extract all antipsychotic prescriptions dispensed during 2001 to subjects aged 65 years or above. Prevalence data were calculated by dividing antipsychotic users by the total number of male and female residents in each age group. During the 12 months surveyed 35 363 subjects received at least one antipsychotic prescription, yielding a prevalence of use of 2.18 subjects per 100 inhabitants (95% confidence interval 2.16-2.20). Almost two-thirds were prescribed first-generation agents only, and thioridazine, a first-generation agent associated with prolonged QTC interval, and which is restricted in most European countries, was the most prescribed agent. However, risperidone and olanzapine accounted for 30% of antipsychotic use for all subjects. The majority of patients were also prescribed agents for medical disorders. Because the population of Lombardy is approximately one-sixth of the entire Italian population, it can be assumed that there are over 200 000 elderly subjects annually exposed to these agents in Italy. This generates particular concern because elderly patients are vulnerable to the adverse effects of antipsychotics, and recent warnings have indicated that there are cerebrovascular risks associated with risperidone and olanzapine therapy.

Economic evaluation of antidepressive agents: a systematic critique of experimental and observational studies

The purpose of this study was to examine whether experimental and observational pharmacoeconomic analyses of antidepressant drugs support the choice of one of the selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors or newer antidepressants as first-line treatment for patients with major depression. We systematically reviewed economic evaluations of two or more antidepressants completed in clinical practice. A systematic electronic search yielded 38 studies meeting the inclusion criteria, of which 23 were administrative database analyses, 12 were observational studies, and 3 were randomized clinical trials. Experimental data indicated that tricyclic antidepressants are equivalent to selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors in terms of total expenditure. While the database analyses are susceptible to bias and confounding variables, they provided an added dimension based on observations from everyday clinical practice. The majority of these studies failed to show any significant difference. Taken together, available pharmacoeconomic studies indicate that tricyclic drugs and selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors have similar cost effectiveness in the health care systems where these comparisons have been made.

Cross-sectional database analysis of antidepressant prescribing in Italy

Antidepressant drug trials have been criticised because they study atypical populations of depressive patients. The present cross-sectional database analysis was designed to define what constitutes a typical population of patients receiving antidepressants. From a database covering a population of 1,057,053 residents in Piedmont, Italy, and including all community (i.e. outside hospitals) prescriptions reimbursed by the National Health System, all prescriptions of antidepressant drugs dispensed during the first six months of 2000 were extracted. Using the general practice patient code all records were attributed to a sample of patients receiving antidepressants. During the study period 22,135 patients were dispensed one or more prescriptions, yielding a prevalence of use of 27.6 (CI 27.1, 28.0) per 1,000 females and 13.7 (CI 13.4, 14.0) per 1,000 males (female/male ratio 2.01). The prevalence of use progressively increased with age, with the highest rates in subjects over 75 years. The distribution of patients by number of antidepressant prescriptions showed that nearly 50% received only one or two prescriptions over the six months surveyed. Moreover, 18,676 subjects (84%) were prescribed antidepressants together with other medications. These data suggest shifting the focus of antidepressant drug trials from selected to non-selected populations of patients, including the elderly and patients with medical comorbidity, enrolled using entry criteria as close as possible to those adopted in everyday clinical practice. The high proportion of occasional antidepressant users suggests that clinical trials should follow all patients, without excluding those who fail to continue the study medication.