A randomized comparison of the effect of four antihypertensive monotherapies on the subjective quality of life in previously untreated asymptomatic patients: field trial in general practice. The OCAPI Study Group. Optimiser le Choix d'un Anti-hypertenseur de Première Intention

Blockade of the angiotensin system improves mental health domain of quality of life: A meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials

OBJECTIVE

It is unclear whether blockade of the angiotensin system has effects on mental health. Our objective was to determine the impact of angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitors and angiotensin II type 1 receptor (AT1R) blockers on mental health domain of quality of life.

STUDY DESIGN

Meta-analysis of published literature.

DATA SOURCES

PubMed and clinicaltrials.gov databases. The last search was conducted in January 2017.

STUDY SELECTION

Randomized controlled trials comparing any angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitor or AT1R blocker versus placebo or non-angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitor or non-AT1R blocker were selected. Study participants were adults without any major physical symptoms. We adhered to meta-analysis reporting methods as per PRISMA and the Cochrane Collaboration.

DATA SYNTHESIS

Eleven studies were included in the analysis. When compared with placebo or other antihypertensive medications, AT1R blockers and angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitors were associated with improved overall quality of life (standard mean difference = 0.11, 95% confidence interval = [0.08, 0.14], p < 0.0001), positive wellbeing (standard mean difference = 0.11, 95% confidence interval = [0.05, 0.17], p < 0.0001), mental (standard mean difference = 0.15, 95% confidence interval = [0.06, 0.25], p < 0.0001), and anxiety (standard mean difference = 0.08, 95% confidence interval = [0.01, 0.16], p < 0.0001) domains of QoL. No significant difference was found for the depression domain (standard mean difference = 0.05, 95% confidence interval = [0.02, 0.12], p = 0.15).

CONCLUSIONS

Use of angiotensin blockers and inhibitors for the treatment of hypertension in otherwise healthy adults is associated with improved mental health domains of quality of life. Mental health quality of life was a secondary outcome in the included studies. Research specifically designed to analyse the usefulness of drugs that block the angiotensin system is necessary to properly evaluate this novel psychiatric target.

Comparative study of control selection in a national population-based case-control study: Estimating risk of smoking on cancer deaths in Chinese men

PURPOSE

To assess the validation of a novel control selection design by comparing the consistency between the new design and a routine design in a large case-control study that was incorporated into a nationwide mortality survey in China.

METHODS

A nationwide mortality study was conducted during 1989-1991. Surviving spouses or other relatives of all adults who died during 1986-1988 provided detailed information about their own as well as the deceased person's smoking history. In this study, 130,079 males who died of various smoking-related cancers at age 35 or over were taken as cases, while 103,248 male surviving spouses (same age range with cases) of women who died during the same period and 49,331 males who died from causes other than those related to smoking were used as control group 1 and control group 2, respectively. Consistency in the results when comparing cases with each of the control groups was assessed.

RESULTS

Consistency in the results was observed in the analyses using different control groups although cancer deaths varied with region and age. Equivalence could be ascertained using a 15% criterion in most cancer deaths which had high death rates in urban areas, but they were uncertain for most cancers in rural areas irrespective of whether the hypothesis testing showed significant differences or not.

CONCLUSIONS

Sex-matched living spouse control design as an alternative control selection for a case-control study is valid and feasible, and the basic principles of the equivalence study are also supported by epidemiological survey data.

Is there an association between physical exercise and the quality of life of hypertensive patients?

CONTEXT

Quality of life of hypertensive patients (QOLHP) is associated with factors that are not always taken into account in the recommendations made by doctors.

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the association between QOLHP and physical exercise in an effectiveness approach, i.e. under the actual conditions of application of these treatments.

METHODOLOGY

In a sample of 361 hypertensive patients registered in a primary care center in Tenerife, Spain, the QOLHP is measured using the PECVEC questionnaire. The main factor considered is physical exercise. In addition, we compiled a set of control variables: pharmacological and dietetic treatments, pathological, clinical, functional, psychological, social, lifestyle and demographic characteristic of the patients. We explored the association between all these factors and the QOLHP by adjusting multiple linear regression models.

RESULTS

The PECVEC results were between 2.0 and 3.5, with an overall Cronbach's alpha reliability statistic of 0.88. From the sample, 58% of the patients engage in physical exercise, 75% maintain a anti-hypertension diet and 89% take hypertension medication. From all the treatments evaluated, only physical exercise is associated directly with all PECVEC scales, especially for women and patients over 65.

CONCLUSIONS

Recommending the practice of physical exercise may be a useful tool for doctors to improve the QOLHP.

Quality of Life Measured in a Practice-Based Hypertension Trial of an Angiotensin Receptor Blocker

Effectiveness of antihypertensive treatment depends not only on drugs that avoid or minimize symptomatic side effects but also on therapy that has a positive effect on quality of life. This study assessed the effect on quality of life of a contemporary agent (an angiotensin receptor blocker) and evaluated the validity and practicality of using a quality-of-life instrument in the practice-based setting. A total of 2716 hypertensive patients, either untreated or on single-agent therapy, were started on or switched to 40 mg telmisartan for 6 weeks; in patients whose blood pressures remained above 130/85 mm Hg after 2 weeks, the dose was increased to 80 mg for the remaining 4 weeks of treatment. Quality of life was measured by patient self-administration of the Psychological General Well-Being Index (GWBI) at baseline and at the end of the study. Sixty-eight percent (n=1858) of patients treated with telmisartan fully completed both GWBI tests; the test score increased by 5.2+/-0.3 (p<0.0001) from 77.7+/-0.4. This improvement was observed across all six emotional and health subscales of the GWBI. White and black patients, those aged <65 or >/=65 years, and men and women had similar increases, though the baseline value in women was sharply lower (p<0.001) than in men. The GWBI rose more in patients whose blood pressure was controlled by treatment (<140/90 mm Hg) than in noncontrolled patients (6.1 vs. 4.1, p<0.0001); for all patients the decreases in systolic and diastolic blood pressures produced by telmisartan correlated significantly (p<0.001 for each) with the increases in the GWBI scores. Controlling blood pressure appears to be an important element in improving subjective health perceptions of hypertensive patients.

[Relationship between clinical and therapeutic variables and health-related quality of life in patients with hypertension. MINICHAL Study]

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE

Our objective was to evaluate, through the health related quality of life (HRQoL) questionnaire MINICHAL, the influence of socio-demographic, clinical and therapeutic variables on health related quality of life of hypertensive patients.

PATIENTS AND METHOD

An observational, prospective and multi-center study was carried out in hypertensive patients who were either starting or undergoing a modification of antihypertensive treatment. A total of three visits was done: a baseline visit and two follow-up visits at one and six months. At all three visits, several socio-demographic, clinical and therapeutic variables were recorded and HRQoL was measured using the MINICHAL questionnaire, the Spanish version of the Psychological General Well-Being Index, and a single question about the change in general health status. The objective was to evaluate the impact of these variables on HRQoL.

RESULTS

736 patients with hypertension were evaluated. In the multivariate analysis, gender, number of concomitant diseases, degree of hypertension, organ damage and educational level were all variables displaying a relation with HRQoL. After 6 months of treatment intensification, an improvement of HRQoL was observed. Moreover, a positive correlation was observed between the degree of reduction of blood pressure (BP) and heart rate and HRQoL improvement, especially in the State of mind dimension.

CONCLUSIONS

In hypertension, a better BP control has a positive influence on HRQoL. As several clinical variables are negatively correlated with HRQoL, specific interventions are needed to correct modifiable factors.

Factors influencing the systolic blood pressure response to drug therapy

In the early stage of hypertension, diastolic blood pressure has greater prognostic importance, but in the elderly, systolic blood pressure is the most important marker of cardiovascular complications. Therefore, the need for more strict control of this component of blood pressure must be reconsidered. The benefit obtained in different studies in the elderly suggests that the treatment of isolated systolic hypertension is associated with a reduction in overall cardiovascular mortality of 22%, in coronary heart disease mortality of 26%, and in stroke mortality of 33%. However, a higher percentage of patients (73%) attain the diastolic goal of <90 mm Hg, while only 34% have systolic pressure reduced to <140 mm Hg. In a review of randomized trials comparing at least four different antihypertensive drugs, significant differences in systolic blood pressure reduction have not been demonstrated, except in black populations, in whom calcium channel blockers and diuretics seem to be more effective. In patients with isolated systolic hypertension, data are inconclusive, but calcium channel blockers and diuretics appear to lower blood pressure to a greater degree than do other antihypertensive drugs. Two main predictors of difficulty in controlling systolic blood pressure are the baseline blood pressure and the presence of diabetes. Other predictors are the duration of arterial hypertension, older age, the presence of target organ damage and associated clinical conditions (myocardial infarction, stroke, chronic renal failure), and an elevated serum uric acid level. It appears that the profile of patients with a poorer therapeutic response includes a greater severity of hypertension and/or the presence of cardiovascular disease.

Health-related quality of life in patients treated for hypertension: a review of the literature from 1990 to 2000

BACKGROUND

The goals of antihypertensive therapy are to achieve and maintain blood pressure control by the least intrusive means possible to prevent future cardiovascular and renal events. To achieve these goals, pharmacologic agents must be chosen so as to minimize drug-related adverse events, increase patient adherence to treatment regimens, and minimize the negative impact on health-related quality of life (HRQL). Although the effects of antihypertensive therapy on HRQL have been extensively investigated, there is little synthesis of the research findings.

OBJECTIVE

This review was undertaken to provide a synthesis of the available data on the impact of antihypertensive therapy on HRQL and to provide recommendations for future research.

METHODS

A MEDLINE literature search was conducted to identify English-language articles published from 1990 to 2000 that included random assignment to antihypertensive treatment and HRQL as an outcome. In addition, reference lists of published reviews and other trials were reviewed to identify other studies of HRQL and antihypertensive therapy.

RESULTS

A total of 48 articles were included in the review. Results among studies were frequently inconsistent, which is likely due to the wide variety of dimensions studied and instruments used as well as a number of methodological weaknesses, including small sample sizes, short-term assessments, and failure to account for missing data.

CONCLUSION

A standardized approach to the assessment of HRQL in hypertensive patients is needed so that research in this area can be of value to clinical practice and to hypertensive patients and their families.

Relation between clinical and therapeutic variables and quality of life in hypertension

OBJECTIVE

Study the relation between quality of life (QoL) and various clinical, therapeutic and sociodemographic variables in treated hypertensive patients.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

A prospective study was carried out in 92 primary care centres in Spain. A total of 269 hypertensive patients were selected and 106 healthy normotensive individuals were included as controls. At the time of inclusion a wide range of clinical variables was documented. QoL was assessed at baseline and 1 month after the intensification of antihypertensive therapy, using a self-administered, specific hypertension, 56-item questionnaire in addition to the generic EuroQoL-5D.

RESULTS

QoL was poorer among the hypertensive subjects than among the normotensive individuals, even adjusting for the differences observed between the groups (age, sex, education and working status). The same was found with the EuroQol-5D. In the hypertensive subjects, after applying a multiple regression equation, only four variables significantly retained their negative impact on QoL: sex (female), greater organ damage and higher heart rate and weight. After the intensification of antihypertensive therapy with irbesartan, QoL improved significantly. Neither the presence of side-effects during the month of follow-up, nor the degree of BP reduction showed a significant impact on QoL, although the latter came close to statistical significance.

CONCLUSIONS

Hypertensive patients have significantly poorer QoL than normotensive subjects, even with adjustment for differences. In hypertensives, QoL is affected by some clinical variables that might help us to identify those with worse QoL. Intensification of antihypertensive therapy produced a positive impact on QoL.

Canadian valsartan study in patients with mild-to-moderate hypertension

OBJECTIVE

This study was designed mainly to establish the rates of response to valsartan 80mg once daily (qd) and to valsartan 160mg qd given to non-responders to 80mg qd, as well as to determine the safety of valsartan and the blood pressure control achieved using valsartan over a period of 24 h or more, using ambulatory blood pressure monitoring (ABPM) devices.

METHODS

This was a single-blind, single-arm, multicenter study involving 256 out-patients with mild-to-moderate essential hypertension. After previous antihypertensive treatments had been 'washed out', the patients were entered into a 2-week placebo run-in period to confirm the diagnosis of mild-to-moderate hypertension. Patients who, at the end of the placebo run-in period, had a mean sitting diastolic blood pressure of between 95 and 115mmHg inclusive received valsartan 80mg qd for 4 weeks. Non-responders (those not demonstrating a diastolic blood pressure of less than 90mmHg or a decrease in diastolic blood pressure of 10mmHg or more compared with baseline) received valsartan 160mg qd for another 4 weeks. In selected centers, patients who agreed also had their blood pressure monitored for 24 h, provided their blood pressure was shown to be controlled. Of these patients, half skipped one dose of valsartan and were monitored for an additional 24h period.

RESULTS

The rate of response to valsartan 80mg was 45.4%, and of those not responding to this dose, 36.3% responded to valsartan 160mg. The response rate to one or other dose was 63.2%. The ambulatory blood pressure data support a consistent reduction of blood pressure with valsartan over a 24h period and for up to 32 h after dosing in those who missed a dose. The overall incidence of adverse experiences per person-year, treatment related or otherwise, was 6.3 and 10.6 for the valsartan and placebo study periods respectively.

CONCLUSION

Antihypertensive treatment with valsartan for 8 weeks produced a significant decrease in diastolic blood pressure in hypertensive patients. In addition, the drug may be safely administered, and the results of 24 h/48 h ambulatory monitoring demonstrate that valsartan is a true once-a-day antihypertensive.

Health-related quality-of-life measurement in hypertension. A review of randomised controlled drug trials

In hypertension, tolerability of drug treatment is important because individuals may see the use of antihypertensive medications as more troubling than their seemingly symptomless disease. This may result in noncompliance and ineffectual long term treatment. In the past 15 years, new antihypertensive medications have been marketed on the basis of the advantages they offer with regard to adverse effects and the unavoidable impact of such adverse effects on a person's quality of life. When related to health, quality of life refers to the physical, psychological and social dimensions of health that are influenced by a person's experiences, beliefs, expectations and perceptions. To measure this concept, many instruments, either generic or specific, may be used. The purpose of this study is to describe, by way of a critical review of the literature, the instruments that are most often used in the measurement of health-related quality of life (HR-QOL) in people using antihypertensive drug treatments. We carried out a search of the literature published in English in the period January 1966 to July 2000, looking for randomised controlled trials of antihypertensive drugs. Using the Medline database, we included 77 papers in our review. Our main finding suggests that HR-QOL changes associated with antihypertensive treatment are measured with many different instruments. In almost all studies, at least 1 instrument specific to a health dimension was used, whereas not many used a generic instrument only. The most commonly measured HR-QOL dimensions were cognitive function, symptomatic well-being, sexual function, psychological well-being, sleep dysfunction, social participation and general health perception. Since the choice of dimensions to measure depends not only on the disease but also on the drug, this review adds further evidence that a generic instrument as well as a preference measurement should be added to a specific instrument.

Claims of equivalence in medical research: are they supported by the evidence?

BACKGROUND

Most clinical studies are done to show comparative superiority, but many reports now claim equivalence between the investigated entities. These assertions may not always be supported by the methods used and the results obtained.

PURPOSE

To assess the justification and support for claims of clinical or therapeutic equivalence in medical journals.

DATA SOURCES

A search of MEDLINE for articles published from 1992 through 1996.

STUDY SELECTION

From 1209 citations that contained the word equivalence in the title or abstract or contained the Medical Subject Heading therapeutic equivalency, we excluded 1121 studies reporting nonoriginal research, purely laboratory or other nonhuman research, and studies in which equivalence was not the main claim. The remaining 88 eligible papers were evaluated for five methodologic attributes.

DATA SYNTHESIS

Only 45 (51%) of the 88 reports were specifically aimed at studying equivalence; the others either tried to show superiority or did not state a research aim. The quantitative distinctions regarded as "equivalent" ranged from 0% to 21% for direct increments and from 0% to 76% for proportionate differences. An equivalence boundary was set and confirmed with an appropriate statistical test in only 23% of reports. In 67% of reports, equivalence was declared after a failed test for comparative superiority, and in 10%, the claim of equivalence was not statistically evaluated. The sample size needed to confirm results had been calculated in advance for only 33% of reports. Sample size was 20 patients per group or fewer in 25% of reports.

CONCLUSIONS

Many studies of clinical equivalence do not set boundaries for equivalence. Claims of "difference" or "similarity" are often made not by thoughtful examination of the data but by tests of statistical significance that are often misapplied or accompanied by inadequate sample sizes. These methodologic flaws can lead to false claims, inconsistencies, and harm to patients.

A computerized intervention to decrease the use of calcium channel blockers in hypertension

OBJECTIVE

To determine whether a computer-assisted reminder would alter prescribing habits for the treatment of hypertension in accordance with current clinical guidelines in a general internal medicine clinic.

DESIGN

A randomized trial.

SETTING

The General Internal Medicine Clinic of the Veterans Affairs Puget Sound Health Care System, Seattle Division.

PATIENTS/PARTICIPANTS

Clinic providers were randomized to a control group (n = 35) or intervention group (n = 36). We targeted the providers of patients being treated for hypertension with calcium channel blockers, a class of drug not recommended for initial therapy.

INTERVENTION

An automated computer query identified eligible patients and their providers. A guideline reminder was placed in the charts of patients of intervention providers; the charts of patients of control providers received no reminder.

MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS

During the 5-month study period, 346 patients were seen by the 36 primary care providers (staff physicians, nurse practitioners, residents, and fellows) in the intervention group, and 373 patients were seen by the 35 providers in the control group. Intervention providers changed 39 patients (11.3%) to other medications during the study period, compared with 1 patient (<1.0%) of control providers (p < .0001). For patients whose therapy was unchanged, providers noted angina in 23.1%, indications other than those for hypertension in 9.5%, intolerable adverse effects with first-line therapy in 13.9%, and inadequate control with first-line therapy in 13.9%. Of those patients without provider-indicated contraindications, 23.6% were switched from calcium channel blockers to first-line agents during the intervention period.

CONCLUSIONS

The use of a computerized, clinic-based intervention increased compliance with guidelines in the treatment of primary hypertension in general, and decreased the use of calcium channel blockers for the treatment of hypertension in particular.

Valsartan, a new angiotensin II receptor antagonist: a double-blind study comparing the incidence of cough with lisinopril and hydrochlorothiazide

The present study compares the occurrence of a dry, persistent cough with doses of 80 mg of valsartan, 10 mg of lisinopril, or 25 mg of hydrochlorothiazide in patients with a history of angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor-induced cough. This was a randomized, double-blind, active-controlled, parallel group, multicenter trial involving 129 adult outpatients with essential hypertension. After confirmation of angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor-induced cough during a 2 to 4 week challenge with lisinopril (followed by a washout period of 2 weeks), patients were randomized to receive 6 weeks of double-blind treatment once daily with 80 mg valsartan, 10 mg lisinopril, or 25 mg hydrochlorothiazide. Assessments were made at baseline and after 3 and 6 weeks of treatment. Comparability of response to treatment was assessed by mean sitting diastolic and systolic blood pressure at the end of treatment. The occurrence of a dry, persistent cough was significantly less (P < 0.001) at 3 and 6 weeks with valsartan (19.5%) than with lisinopril (68.9%), with no significant difference between valsartan and hydrochlorothiazide (19.0%). There were no statistically significant differences in reduction of blood pressure among the three treatment groups. The overall incidence of adverse experiences, whether or not treatment-related, was highest for lisinopril (86.7%) compared with valsartan (57.1%), and hydrochlorothiazide (61.9%). A dry cough in the lisinopril group accounted for this difference. There were no clinically significant changes in physical signs or in results of clinical laboratory evaluations during double-blind treatment, except for from metabolic changes in 3 patients receiving hydrochlorothiazide. In hypertensive patients with a history of angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor-induced cough, a single daily dose of 80 mg of valsartan produced therapeutic efficacy comparable to lisinopril but with significantly less cough.

The efficacy and safety of valsartan compared with placebo in the treatment of patients with essential hypertension

A multicenter, randomized, placebo-controlled, double-masked, parallel-group study was performed to compare the efficacy and safety of valsartan 20, 80, 160, and 320 mg with placebo in the treatment of patients with essential hypertension. A total of 736 adults with uncomplicated essential hypertension stages 1 to 3 were randomized to receive placebo or valsartan 20, 80, 160, or 320 mg daily for 8 weeks. Assessments were made at baseline, after 4 and 8 weeks of treatment, and 2 to 3 days after stopping treatment. The primary efficacy variable was change from baseline in mean sitting diastolic blood pressure (MSDBP). Other variables included change from baseline in mean sitting systolic blood pressure (MSSBP) and responder rates (ie, MSDBP < 90 mm Hg or decrease of > or = 10 mm Hg from baseline). All doses of valsartan produced statistically significant reductions in both MSDBP and MSSBP at end point compared with placebo. A dose-response effect was seen, although the incremental reduction in blood pressure with doses of valsartan > 80 mg was relatively small. Statistically significant differences in responder rates at end point were seen for doses of valsartan of 80 mg and above compared with placebo, whereas the responder rates for valsartan 20 mg was not significantly different from that for placebo. Safety and tolerability variables included data on adverse experiences, rebound hypertension, and clinical laboratory evaluations. Tolerability was good, with headache being the most common complaint and occurring most frequently in placebo patients. The incidence of dizziness was similar among the placebo (5.4%) and valsartan 20-mg to 160-mg groups (2.1% to 3.4%); there was an increase in the incidence of dizziness in the 320-mg group (9.3%). No cases of symptomatic orthostatic hypotension occurred. Analysis of rebound showed that 11.6% of patients receiving placebo and 16.6% receiving valsartan had an increase in MSDBP to baseline levels or above 2 to 3 days after stopping treatment. No clinically significant adverse experiences were noted after stopping treatment. There were no clinically or statistically significant changes in laboratory values during treatment. Thus valsartan proved to be both effective and safe in reducing blood pressure in adults with essential hypertension. The optimal dose range is 80 to 160 mg, given once daily.