The use of sonography for evaluation of the integrity and healing process of the tibiofibular interosseous membrane in ankle fractures

Diagnosis and treatment of ankle syndesmosis injuries with associated interosseous membrane injury: a current concept review

BACKGROUND

Tibiofibular syndesmosis injury leads to ankle pain and dysfunction when ankle injuries are not treated properly. Despite several studies having been performed, many questions about diagnosis and treatment remain unanswered, especially in ankle syndesmosis injury with interosseous membrane injury. Therefore, the purpose of this study was to help guide best practice recommendations.

METHODS

This review explores the mechanism of injury, clinical features, diagnosis methods, and the treatment strategy for ankle syndesmosis injury with interosseous membrane injury to highlight the current evidence in terms of the controversies surrounding the management of these injuries.

RESULTS

Radiological and CT examination are an important basis for diagnosing ankle syndesmosis injury. Physical examination combined with MRI to determine the damage to the interosseous membrane is significant in guiding the treatment of ankle syndesmosis injury with interosseous membrane injury. In the past, inserting syndesmosis screws was the gold standard for treating ankle syndesmosis injury. However, there were increasingly more controversies regarding loss of reduction and broken nails, so elastic fixation has become more popular in recent years.

CONCLUSIONS

Anatomical reduction and effective fixation are the main aspects to be considered in the treatment of ankle syndesmosis injury with interosseous membrane injury and are the key to reducing postsurgery complications.

Diagnostic Accuracy of Radiologic Methods for Ankle Syndesmosis Injury: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

: Misdiagnosis and inadequate treatment of syndesmosis could result in significant long-term morbidity including pain, instability, and degenerative changes of the ankle joint. The objective of this systematic review and meta-analysis was to determine whether radiologic tests accurately and reliably diagnose ankle syndesmosis injury. Medline, Embase, and Cochrane were searched. The database search resulted in 258 full text articles that we assessed for eligibility, we used eight studies that met all the inclusion criteria. In subgroup meta-analysis, the sensitivity analysis showed significant differences only in the MRI (Magnetic Resonance Imaging), and specificity was not statistically significant. In diagnostic meta-analysis, the pooled sensitivity and specificity were 0.528 and 0.984 for X-rays, 0.669 and 0.87 for CT (Computed Tomography), and 0.929 and 0.865 for MRI, all respectively. For sensitivity, MRI showed significantly sensitivity as higher than the other methods, and we detected no significance for specificity. Syndesmosis injuries differed significantly in the accuracy of radiological methods according to the presence of accompanied ankle fractures. In patients with fractures, simple radiography has good specificity, and CT and MRI have high sensitivity and specificity irrespective of fracture; in particular, MRI has similar accuracy to gold standard arthroscopic findings.

ACR Appropriateness Criteria® Chronic Ankle Pain

Chronic ankle pain is a common clinical problem whose cause is often elucidated by imaging. The ACR Appropriateness Criteria for chronic ankle pain define best practices of image ordering. Clinical scenarios are followed by the imaging choices and their appropriateness. The information is in ordered tables with an accompanying narrative explanation to guide physicians to order the right test. The American College of Radiology Appropriateness Criteria are evidence-based guidelines for specific clinical conditions that are reviewed annually by a multidisciplinary expert panel. The guideline development and revision include an extensive analysis of current medical literature from peer reviewed journals and the application of well-established methodologies (RAND/UCLA Appropriateness Method and Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation or GRADE) to rate the appropriateness of imaging and treatment procedures for specific clinical scenarios. In those instances where evidence is lacking or equivocal, expert opinion may supplement the available evidence to recommend imaging or treatment.

The use of ultrasound in evaluating orthopaedic trauma patients

Musculoskeletal ultrasound is a low-cost, noninvasive method of evaluating orthopaedic trauma patients. It is particularly useful for patients with metallic hardware, which may degrade computed tomography or magnetic resonance images. Ultrasound has been used to evaluate fracture union and nonunion, infection, ligamentous injury, nerve compression, and mechanical impingement caused by hardware. Real-time dynamic examination allows identification of pathology and provides direct correlation between symptoms and the observed pathology.

Forearm interosseous membrane imaging and anatomy

OBJECTIVE

To determine the regional thickness variation of the interosseous membrane (IOM) along the forearm and validate magnetic resonance imaging of the IOM with laser micrometry.

DESIGN AND PATIENTS

Axial thickness measurements of 12 cadaver forearms were obtained using magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) at radial, central, and ulnar locations. The specimens were dissected, and IOM thickness measured using a laser micrometer. MRI and laser measurements of the main and oblique IOM bundles were compared. An axial thickness profile was plotted versus forearm length, and radial, central, and ulnar positions were compared.

RESULTS

The main bundle thickness was 2.18+/-0.20 mm using laser micrometry, which was not significantly different from MRI measurements (1.86+/-0.25 mm, p=0.11, power = 0.84). The dorsal oblique bundle thickness was not significantly different between measurement methods (2.93+/-0.77 mm and 3.30+/-1.64 mm using laser micrometry and MRI respectively, p=0.75, power = 0.04). Both methods demonstrated a progressive increase in thickness proximally within the forearm. MRI measurements demonstrated a significantly greater thickness increase in the radial location compared to the central location (slope = 2.26 and 1.05, r(2)=0.31 and 0.12 respectively, p<0.05). The ulnar slope was not significantly different from zero ( r(2)=0.02, p>0.05).

CONCLUSION

Our findings describe the varying IOM anatomy using MRI, and determined the location of the clinically important IOM fiber bundles. This study confirms the accuracy of MR imaging of the IOM by comparison with a laser micrometer, and demonstrates the thickness variation along the forearm. This information may be used to identify changes in IOM anatomy with both acute IOM injury and chronic fiber attenuation.

Sonographic evaluation of lower extremity interosseous membrane injuries: retrospective review in 3 patients

OBJECTIVE

To describe the sonographic findings of lower extremity interosseous membrane disruption with computed tomographic and surgical correlation.

METHODS

Three patients with sonographic evaluation of the lower extremity interosseous membrane were identified through the clinical experience of 1 author over a 5-year period. Sonographic images of the symptomatic and unaffected lower extremities were retrospectively characterized and correlated with computed tomographic and surgical findings by 2 fellowship-trained musculoskeletal radiologists.

RESULTS

The normal interosseous membrane was identified in the asymptomatic lower extremities in all 3 patients, which appeared as a thin, hyperechoic (nearly equal to bone cortex) line, continuous from the tibia to the fibula. The abnormal interosseous membrane in all 3 cases appeared abnormally hypoechoic, poorly defined, and discontinuous at the tibia. A proximal fibular fracture was shown on sonography in 1 of 3 symptomatic lower extremities with radiographic evidence of a fracture. The sonographic findings correlated with the computed tomographic images. Distal tibiofibular syndesmosis injuries were confirmed and treated at surgery in 2 patients.

CONCLUSIONS

Sonography can show both normal and injured interosseous membranes of the lower extremity, as well as associated proximal fibular fractures.

Ultrasonography for the evaluation of forearm interosseous membrane disruption in a cadaver model

Recognition of interosseous membrane disruption associated with radial head injury and Essex-Lopresti injury is important, especially if radial head excision is contemplated. Because a widely accepted method to diagnose interosseous membrane disruption does not exist, we evaluated the accuracy of ultrasonography to diagnose this injury in a cadaver model. Nine pairs of cadaver forearms were randomized into 2 groups. The central third of the interosseous membrane of forearms of group 1 was cut, whereas it was visualized but not cut in group 2. A dynamic ultrasound examination was performed to determine interosseous membrane integrity, and static images were made. The static images were evaluated by 2 other radiologists and interpretations were recorded. One radiologist incorrectly interpreted 1 pair of forearms; the other 2 radiologists were 100% accurate. The accuracy of ultrasonography in detecting interosseous injuries was 96% with our methods.

Ultrasound of fracture and bone healing

This article reviews the ultrasound appearance of common fractures that may mimic other pathologies. Recent works suggest a role for ultrasound in the assessment of callus formation in delayed union of fractures and following the Ilizarov reconstructive procedures.