Safe extracapsular placement of proximal tibia transfixation pins

Current concepts review. Management of proximal tibial fractures

The management of proximal tibial fractures has evolved significantly in recent years. While the main goals of treatment - stability, restoration of the mechanical axis, and smooth articular surfaces - remain the same, methods have advanced substantially. In diagnostics, technical progress in CT and MR imaging has led to a better three-dimensional understanding of the injury. Newly developed classification systems such as the three-column concept of Luo et al. and the 10-segment concept of Krause et al. take this into account. Accordingly, there is a trend towards tailored approaches for particular fracture localizations. Parallel to this development, there is increasing evidence of the advantages of arthroscopically assisted surgical procedures. This Current Concepts article reviews classifications, diagnostics, treatment options as well as complications in fractures of the proximal tibia.

Avoiding iatrogenic vascular injury in tibial external fixation with half pins. An in-vivo study based on CT angiography

BACKGROUND

External fixation is an important tool in the management of variety of tibial fractures. Appropriate half pin insertion is important, to provide stable fixation without compromising the surgical field for definitive surgical procedures, and avoiding further damage to the important structures of the traumatized limb. There is paucity of literature about the optimal trajectories and safe corridors for half pins insertion based on in vivo studies. The available studies are based on anatomic atlases, cadaveric studies or half pin related complications.The aim of the current study is to present the findings of CT angiograms, in patients with external fixation of tibia, to enhance our understanding of optimal trajectories in safe corridors for half pins insertion.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

We performed a retrospective study of patients with external fixators on the tibia, who had undergone CT angiogram as part of pre-operative planning for orthoplastic reconstructive procedures. The relationship between the tips of the fixator half pins and named vessels of the leg were analyzed, pins within 5 mm of a named vessel were considered to be a risk of causing iatrogenic injury.

RESULTS

A total 51 patients, with in situ temporizing external fixators, with 134 half pins in different segments of the tibia were analyzed. More than 5 mm of penetration beyond the far cortex was noted in 47%, while in another 16% of pins penetration was more than 10 mm beyond the cortex. A tip to vessel distance (TVD) of 5 mm or less was noted in 28/134 (21%) of the pins, which highlights potential risk to the neurovascular bundles of the leg.

CONCLUSION

Risk of iatrogenic injury to neurovascular structures from half pin insertion can be reduced by meticulous use of fluoroscopy, by avoiding penetration beyond the far cortex, and avoiding exiting with half pins on the lateral surface in the distal 1/3rd of segment II of tibia. Moreover observing optimal trajectories and safe corridors for pin insertion, and selection of appropriate type of half pin can mitigate the risk to these structures.

Knee Capsule Anatomy: An MR Imaging and Cadaveric Study

This research focuses on the anatomical insertion of the synovial capsule around the knee. The attachments of the capsule were measured in 50 knee MR imaging studies with large intraarticular effusion. Corresponding measurements were performed in 20 fresh frozen cadaveric specimens, for validation. Femoral and tibial capsular reflections were defined as the distances between the attachment sites of the capsule and the femoral or tibial joint line and they were recorded in three coronal planes (anterior/middle/posterior). On MR imaging, the lateral/medial femoral capsular reflection mean values were 6.5/4.57 cm, 2.74/1.74 cm and 1.52/1.99 cm in the anterior, middle and posterior plane, respectively. MR imaging-based measurements did not differ significantly compared to corresponding cadaveric measurements. The mean values of the lateral/medial tibial capsular reflection on MR imaging were 0.09/0.11 cm, 0.34/0.26 cm and 0.62/0.34 cm in the anterior, middle and posterior plane, respectively. On cadaveric dissection, the maximum mean value was 1.45 cm, measured on the lateral side of the anterior plane. Apart from the lateral aspect of the posterior plane, MR imaging measurements were significantly lower, compared to the corresponding cadaveric measurements. The greatest femoral and tibial capsular reflections were found on the anterior and lateral side of the anterior plane. MR imaging appears to underestimate the distal extent of the knee capsule. Anatomical details of the knee capsule should be considered for safe insertion of external fixator pins.

Proximal Tibia Skeletal Traction: Technique and Indications

Skeletal traction is a fundamental tool for the orthopaedic surgeon caring for patients with traumatic pelvic and lower-extremity orthopaedic injuries. Skeletal traction has proven to be an effective initial means of stabilization in patients with these injuries. Traction may be used for both temporary and definitive treatment in a variety of orthopaedic injuries. With the appropriate knowledge of regional anatomy, skeletal traction pins can be placed safely and with a low rate of complications. Several methods for placing skeletal traction have been described, and it is critical for orthopaedic surgeons to be proficient not only in their application but also understanding of the appropriate indications for use. Here we present a case example of a patient with a right femur fracture and discuss the technique and indications for placement of proximal tibia skeletal traction.

"Nailable" External Fixation of the Tibia: A Novel Technique to Accommodate Delayed Intramedullary Nailing of the Tibia

External fixation is often used for temporary stabilization of the tibia in several clinical scenarios. Conventional placement of external fixation pins may impede instrumentation with intramedullary nailing, thus requiring pin removal, loss of reduction, and increased operative time during definite fixation. In this article, we describe a strategic pin placement routinely used at our institution in which we create a medially based inverted triangular construct that allows for pins to remain in place during definitive fixation.

Advantages of external hybrid fixators for treating Schatzker V-VI tibial plateau fractures: A retrospective study of 40 cases

INTRODUCTION

Proximal tibia fractures make up 1% of all fractures in adults. The fractures classified as Schatzker V and VI fractures can compromise knee structure and function. They are challenging to treat and often have complications. While plate fixation is the gold standard, the resulting infection rate has led us to favor external hybrid fixation. The aims of this study were to assess the radiographic and functional outcomes along with the complication rate when using this method and to compare them to historical plate fixation data.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

This was a retrospective study of 40 patients. The complications, quality of reduction, IKS, Lysholm and Rasmussen functional scores at the latest follow-up and factors affecting the functional outcome were evaluated. These parameters were compared to published results from plate fixation studies.

RESULTS

The deep infection rate was 2.5%. The union rate was 80%. Satisfactory reduction was obtained in 70% of cases; however, 52% of patients had malunion. The mean IKS score was 73.74, the mean Rasmussen score was 22.85 and the mean Lysholm score was 75.53. Age, reduction at latest follow-up, mechanical axis and anteroposterior laxity had a significant effect on the functional outcome.

DISCUSSION

Despite the malunion rate being higher than other studies, the functional outcomes were nearly identical based on the variables measured. There are several advantages associated with using a hybrid external fixator: shorter operative time, less bleeding, shorter hospital stays and lower infection rate.

CONCLUSION

Hybrid external fixation is a reliable fracture fixation method that leads to satisfactory functional outcomes, while reducing the infection rate and allowing arthroplasty to be performed in the future if needed.

Indications and anatomic landmarks for the application of lower extremity traction: a review

PURPOSE

Fractures of the lower extremity, particularly of the femur and acetabulum, may be difficult to immobilize with splinting alone. These injuries may be best stabilized with the application of various types of skeletal traction. Often, traction is applied percutaneously in an emergent setting, making the knowledge of both superficial and deep anatomy crucial to successful placement.

METHODS

Review was performed via PubMed search as well as referencing the Orthopaedic literature. Relevant articles to the anatomy of the knee, ankle and calcaneus as they pertain to traction placement were referenced in compiling the optimal recommendations for traction placement.

CONCLUSION

By palpating and marking superficial landmarks and observing specific anatomic relationships, safe application of traction pins can be performed while minimizing iatrogenic injury to vital anatomic structures, and avoiding intra-articular placement which could potentially lead to joint infection.

Retrospective review of tibial plateau fractures treated by two methods without staging

INTRODUCTION

Management of complex tibial plateau fractures can be challenging for orthopaedic surgeons. Wide disagreement still remains about the best surgical technique to use in these fractures. The purpose of this study was to compare the results of complex tibial plateau fractures treated by an open reduction and internal fixation (ORIF) versus hybrid external fixation (EF) in term of clinical and functional outcomes.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We retrospectively examined a series of 79 patients affected by tibial plateau fractures admitted at our Department between January 2006 and November 2011. Forty-one patients were treated using a hybrid EF; in 38 cases, ORIF technique was used. Clinical evaluation was performed using the method of Rasmussen; functional assessment was made using the Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Arthritis Index (WOMAC) questionnaire. Residual pain was detected using a Numeric Rating Scale (NRS).

RESULTS

The average time to union in the plate group was 17.2 weeks (9.1-45 weeks), while in the EF one 15.9 (7.5-32). The mean overall hospital stay was 14.2 days for the ORIF group and 7.8 for the EF group. At the last follow-up, the mean Rasmussen score was 24.9 (good) in the patients treated with ORIF and 25 (good) in those who received EF. The WOMAC index disclosed a relatively higher score in the EF group (80.5 ORIF-84.2 EF). Pain evaluation revealed no differences between the groups. In terms of complications, deep infection occurred in four (10.5%) patients belonging to the ORIF group and 2 (4.9%) to EF one. Signs of osteoarthritis (OA) were observed in 4 (10.5%) knees that had open reduction and in 11 (26.9%) that had a hybrid external fixator.

CONCLUSIONS

Either ORIF or hybrid EF represents a valid treatment option in complex tibial plateau fractures. However, hybrid external fixation has shown relative better functional outcome results, relative lower rate of infection and decreased hospital stays. These aspects make of EF our best choice in case of high-energy complex tibial fractures.

Low Complication Rates Associated With the Application of Lower Extremity Traction Pins

OBJECTIVE

To quantify the infection risks of temporary lower extremity traction pins and compare these rates to nationwide and institution-specific surgical site infection rates. Additionally, to qualitatively describe pin site infections and to analyze the impact of traction pins on infection risks at associated open reduction internal fixation (ORIF) surgical sites.

DESIGN

A retrospective case-control study.

SETTING

Level I Urban University Trauma Center.

PATIENTS

One hundred sixty-nine cases of traction pin application occurring in 157 unique patients extracted from a trauma patient database.

INTERVENTION

Bedside application of a traction pin in the femur or tibia.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS

Rates of 90-day and 1-year minor and major infections at pin insertion locations and at ORIF wounds associated with traction pins.

RESULTS

A single infection, a septic knee, was reported. There were no superficial infections or osteomyelitis cases observed. The 90-day and 1-year rates of infection were identical with a per pin infection rate of 0.6% [95% confidence interval (CI), 0.1%-3.4%], a minor infection rate of 0.0% (95% CI, 0.0%-2.3%), and a major infection rate of 0.6% (95% CI, 0.1%-3.4%). Observed rates were lower than, but statistically similar to, nationwide infection rates for open reduction procedures and similar to institution-specific infection rates for arthroplasty procedures. Infection rates at associated ORIF wounds were not increased in comparison with nationwide controls. Pin placement played a definitive role in the infection observed.

CONCLUSIONS

Temporary lower extremity traction pins have low infection rates and can be safely placed at the bedside. Careful pin placement and review of postinsertion radiographs is necessary to avoid iatrogenic infection.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Prognostic Level IV. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

Are distal femoral traction pins intra-articular? A cadaveric study

OBJECTIVES

To examine the frequency of intra-articular placement of distal femoral traction pins and their proximity to the superficial femoral artery (SFA).

METHODS

Wires were placed in the distal femurs of 28 cadaveric knees at the adductor tubercle (ADT), the superior pole of the patella (SPP), and 2 cm proximal to SPP (SPP+2). A lateral fluoroscopic image was obtained after injection of radiopaque contrast to assess for joint penetration. Dissection was performed to confirm or refute fluoroscopic findings. The distance from each wire to the SFA was measured.

RESULTS

The percentage of intra-articular placement was higher (29%) at the ADT than the SPP+2 (0%) level. The mean (SD) distances from the ADT, SPP, and SPP+2 to the SFA were 7.4 (±1.8) cm, 5.7 (±1.7) cm, and 3.8 (±1.7) cm, respectively (P < 0.0001). None of the wires penetrated the femoral artery. The proportion of wires judged to be intra-articular was not statistically different whether judged by fluoroscopy or anatomic dissection (exact P = 1.0).

CONCLUSIONS

Wires placed at the level of the ADT are at risk for capsular penetration. Risk of major vascular injury with transmedullary placement at all levels seems to be minimal. The optimum position for distal femoral pins remains unknown, but aiming >0.7 cm proximal to the ADT may lower the risk of intra-articular placement. No difference was detected between fluoroscopic arthrography and gross dissection.

Open reduction and internal fixation compared with circular fixator application for bicondylar tibial plateau fractures. Results of a multicenter, prospective, randomized clinical trial

BACKGROUND

Standard open reduction and internal fixation techniques have been successful in restoring osseous alignment for bicondylar tibial plateau fractures; however, surgical morbidity, especially soft-tissue infection and wound necrosis, has been reported frequently. For this reason, several investigators have proposed minimally invasive methods of fracture reduction followed by circular external fixation as an alternative approach. To our knowledge, there has been no direct comparison of the two operative approaches.

METHODS

We performed a multicenter, prospective, randomized clinical trial in which standard open reduction and internal fixation with medial and lateral plates was compared with percutaneous and/or limited open fixation and application of a circular fixator for displaced bicondylar tibial plateau fractures (Schatzker types V and VI and Orthopaedic Trauma Association types C1, C2, and C3). Eighty-three fractures in eighty-two patients were randomized to operative treatment (forty-three fractures were randomized to circular external fixation and forty to open reduction and internal fixation). Follow-up consisted of obtaining a history, physical examination, and radiographs; completion of the Hospital for Special Surgery (HSS) knee score, the Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC), and the Short Form-36 (SF-36) General Health Survey; and recording of complication and reoperation rates.

RESULTS

There were no significant differences between the groups in terms of demographic variables, mechanism of injury, or fracture severity and/or displacement. However, patients in the circular fixator group had less intraoperative blood loss than those in the open reduction and internal fixation group (213 mL and 544 mL, respectively; p=0.006) and spent less time in the hospital (9.9 days and 23.4 days, respectively; p=0.024). The quality of osseous reduction was similar in the groups. There was a trend for patients in the circular fixator group to have superior early outcome in terms of HSS scores at six months (p=0.064) and the ability to return to preinjury activities at six months (p=0.031) and twelve months (p=0.024). These outcomes were not significantly different at two years. There was no difference in total arc of knee motion, and the WOMAC scores at two years after the injury were not significantly different between the groups with regard to the pain (p=0.923), stiffness (p=0.604), or function (p=0.827) categories. The SF-36 scores at two years after the injury were significantly decreased compared with the controls for both groups (p=0.001 for the circular fixator group and p=0.014 for the open reduction and internal fixation group), although there was less impairment in the circular fixator group in the bodily pain category (a score of 46) compared with the open reduction and internal fixation group (a score of 35) (p=0.041). Seven (18%) of the forty patients in the open reduction and internal fixation group had a deep infection. The number of unplanned repeat surgical interventions, and their severity, was greater in the open reduction and internal fixation group (thirty-seven procedures) compared with the circular fixator group (sixteen procedures) (p=0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

Both techniques provide a satisfactory quality of fracture reduction. Because percutaneous reduction and application of a circular fixator results in a shorter hospital stay, a marginally faster return of function, and similar clinical outcomes and because the number and severity of complications is much higher with open reduction and internal fixation, we believe that circular external fixation is an attractive option for these difficult-to-treat fractures. Regardless of treatment method, patients with this injury have substantial residual limb-specific and general health deficits at two years of follow-up.

High-energy tibial plateau fractures

The severity of a tibial plateau fracture and the complexity of its treatment depend on the energy imparted to the limb. Low-energy injuries typically cause unilateral depression-type fractures, whereas high-energy injuries can lead to comminuted fractures with significant osseous, soft-tissue, and neurovascular injury. Evaluation includes appropriate radiographs and careful clinical assessment of the soft-tissue envelope. Treatment is directed at safeguarding tissue vascularity and emphasizes restoration of joint congruity and the mechanical axis of the limb. Temporary joint-spanning external fixation facilitates soft-tissue recovery, whereas minimally invasive techniques and anatomically contoured plates can limit damage to the soft tissues and provide stable fixation. Alternatively, the use of limited internal fixation and definitive external fixation can minimize soft-tissue disruption, avoid complications, and allow fracture union. Complications, including infection, loss of fixation, and malalignment, are best avoided by following these biologically respectful treatment principles.

The proximal extent of the ankle capsule and safety for the insertion of percutaneous fine wires

We have assessed the proximal capsular extension of the ankle joint in 18 patients who had a contrast-enhanced MRI ankle arthrogram in order to delineate the capsular attachments. We noted consistent proximal capsular extensions anterior to the distal tibia and in the tibiofibular recess. The mean capsular extension anterior to the distal tibia was 9.6 mm (4.9 to 27.0) proximal to the anteroinferior tibial margin and 3.8 mm (-2.1 to 9.3) proximal to the dome of the tibial plafond. In the tibiofibular recess, the mean capsular extension was 19.2 mm (12.7 to 38.0) proximal to the anteroinferior tibial margin and 13.4 mm (5.8 to 20.5) proximal to the dome of the tibial plafond. These areas of proximal capsular extensions run the risk of being traversed during the insertion of finewires for the treatment of fractures of the distal tibia. Surgeons using these techniques should be aware of this anatomy in order to minimise the risk of septic arthritis.

Minimal internal fixation augmented by small wire transfixion frames for high-energy tibial plateau fractures

PURPOSE

To evaluate the outcome of bicondylar tibial plateau fractures treated with minimal internal fixation augmented by small wire external fixation frames and to assess the necessity of bridging the knee joint by extending the external fixation to the distal femur.

METHODS

This is a retrospective study of 48 tibial plateau fractures. There were 40 (83.5%) Schatzker type VI fractures, 8 Schatzker type V fractures, and 18 (37.5%) fractures were open. A complex injury according to the Tscherne-Lobenhoffer classification was recorded in 30 (62.5%) patients. All fractures were treated with combined minimally invasive internal and external fixation. Closed reduction was achieved in 32 (66.6%) of the fractures. Extension of the external fixation to the distal femur was done in 30 (62.5%) fractures. Results were assessed according to the criteria of Honkonen-Jarvinen.

RESULTS

Follow-up ranged from 28 to 60 months with an average of 38 months. All fractures but 1 united at an average of 13.5 weeks (range 11-18 weeks). One patient developed an infected nonunion of the diaphyseal segment of his fracture. Thirty-nine (81%) patients achieved an excellent or good radiologic result. An excellent or good final clinical result was recorded in 36 patients (76%). Bridging the knee joint did not affect significantly the result (P < 0.418). No significant correlation was found between the type of fracture and the final score (P < 0.458).

CONCLUSIONS

Hybrid internal and external fixation combined with tibiofemoral extension of the fixation is an attractive treatment option for complex tibial plateau fractures.

Septic arthritis of the major joints of the lower limb after periarticular external fixation application: are conventional safe corridors enough to prevent it?

Septic arthritis as a result of pin track infection, following application of external fixators in periarticular fractures of the lower limb, is a rare, but serious complication. Several studies, combining cadaver dissection and MRI scans or conventional X-ray measurements, have tried to define the exact anatomy of the capsular reflection in the major joints of the lower limb (hip, knee and ankle), in order to provide specific safe corridors for extra-capsular wire and pin placement. These studies are reviewed, their methods and results are presented, and their conclusions are evaluated as suggested guidelines for safe extra-capsular wire and pin insertion.

Extracapsular placement of distal tibial transfixation wires

BACKGROUND

Treatment of tibial plafond fractures with external fixation may involve use of transfixation wires within the periarticular region. Pin track infections that develop along wires placed intracapsularly may lead to joint infection. To our knowledge, there have been no previous investigations assessing the circumferential reflection of the ankle capsule or the potential for communication between the distal tibiofibular joint and the tibiotalar joint. The purpose of this study was to define these anatomic entities to provide guidelines for safe extracapsular placement of distal tibial wires.

METHODS

Twelve fresh-frozen cadaveric ankles and three ankles of living human volunteers were utilized for this study. High-resolution magnetic resonance imaging was performed on each ankle after pressurized distention of the joint capsule with gadolinium solution. The perpendicular distance from the subchondral bone at the joint line to the capsular synovial reflection was measured with use of a verified technique. The cadaveric ankles were sectioned, the capsular synovial reflections were measured by investigators who were blinded to the imaging results, and the corresponding measurements were compared.

RESULTS

The anterolateral capsular synovial region displayed the most proximal reflection in all specimens (mean, 9.3 mm; maximum, 12.2 mm). The anteromedial region displayed less reflection (mean, 3.3 mm; maximum, 5.5 mm). All posteromedial and posterolateral synovial reflections were <or=2 mm. Capsular synovial reflections proximal to the medial and lateral malleoli were negligible. In all ankles, the distal tibiofibular joint communicated with the tibiotalar joint and had a maximum proximal extension of 20.6 mm.

CONCLUSIONS

Placement of distal tibial transfixation wires >12.2 mm from the subchondral surface of the plafond avoids penetration of the capsule. The distal tibiofibular joint communicates with the tibiotalar joint and thus should not be penetrated, to ensure extracapsular placement of the wires.

Hybrid external fixation of the proximal tibia: strategies to improve frame stability

OBJECTIVE

To determine the specific frame construction strategies that can increase the stability of hybrid (ring with tensioned wires proximally connected by bars to half-pins distally) external fixation of proximal tibia fractures. DESIGN Repeated measures biomechanical testing.

SETTING

Laboratory.

SPECIMENS

Composite fiberglass tibias.

METHODS

Using the Heidelberg and Ilizarov systems, external fixators were tested on composite fiberglass tibias with a 1-cm proximal osteotomy (OTA fracture classification 41-A3.3) in seven frame configurations: unilateral frames with 5-mm diameter half-pins and 6-mm diameter half-pins; hybrid (as described above), with and without a 6-mm anterior proximal half-pin; a "box" hybrid (additional ring group distal to the fracture connected by symmetrically spaced bars to the proximal rings) with and without an anterior, proximal half-pin; and a full, four-ring configuration. Each configuration was loaded in four positions (central, medial, posterior, and posteromedial).

MAIN OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS

Displacement at point of loading of proximal fragment.

RESULTS

The "box" hybrid was stiffer than the standard hybrid for all loading positions. The addition of an anterior half-pin stiffened the standard hybrid and the "box" hybrid.

CONCLUSIONS

The most dramatic improvements in the stability of hybrid frames used for proximal tibial fractures result from addition of an anterior, proximal half-pin.

High-energy fractures of the tibial plateau. Knee function after longer follow-up

BACKGROUND

Studies of the long-term outcomes of treatment of fractures of the tibial plateau have included wide mixtures of fracture types and mostly low-energy split and split-depression fractures. The long-term results of treatment of high-energy intra-articular proximal tibial fractures are unknown. The purpose of this study was to assess the function of the knee and the development of arthrosis at a minimum of five years after injury in a consecutive series of patients in whom a high-energy fracture of the tibial plateau had been treated with a uniform technique of external fixation.

METHODS

Between July 1988 and December 1994, thirty patients with a total of thirty-one fractures of the tibial plateau were treated with a monolateral external fixator and limited internal fixation of the articular surface. Follow-up data on twenty-four knees in twenty-three patients were obtained at a mean of ninety-eight months. Twenty patients (twenty knees) returned specifically for the study, at which time they completed an Iowa Knee Score questionnaire and a Short Form-36 (SF-36) general health survey, a physical examination was performed, and weight-bearing radiographs were made. The results of the SF-36 evaluations for fourteen patients and the Knee Scores for twelve were compared with those obtained five years previously, at two to four years after the injury.

RESULTS

After healing, no patient required a secondary reconstructive procedure. The range of motion of the knee averaged 3 degrees of extension to 120 degrees flexion, which was an average of 87% of the total arc of the contralateral knee. The average Iowa Knee Score was 90 points (range, 72 to 100 points). For twelve patients, the Iowa Knee Score previously recorded at two to four years averaged 92 points, as did the score at the time of the latest follow-up. Thirteen patients rated their outcome as excellent; six, as good; and three, as fair. Fifteen patients were working, and ten of them were performing strenuous labor. Radiographs showed no evidence of arthrosis in fourteen knees, grade-1 arthrosis in three, grade-2 in three, and grade-3 in two. Compared with the radiographic appearance two to four years after injury, there was no evidence of progression of arthrosis in eighteen knees and one grade of progression in four. The SF-36 subscale scores were similar to those of age-matched controls. The fourteen patients who had previous SF-36 scores had no deterioration of these scores.

CONCLUSIONS

Patients with a high-energy fracture of the tibial plateau treated with external fixation have a good prognosis for satisfactory knee function in the second five years after injury. The knee joint cartilage appears to be tolerant of both the injury and mild-to-moderate residual articular displacement, which was associated with a low rate of severe arthrosis.

The centered lateral fluoroscopic image of the knee: the key to safe tensioned wire placement in periarticular fractures of the proximal tibia

The importance of using the centered lateral view of the knee for placement of tensioned wires during the treatment of periarticular fractures of the proximal tibia is illustrated. The technique of using a horizontal reference wire as a landmark for subsequent wire placement is described for circular fixators and hybrid fixators.

Distraction osteogenesis for nonunion after high tibial osteotomy

The purpose of this study was to determine whether distraction osteogenesis can be used to treat hypertrophic nonunion associated with angular deformity and shortening after Coventry style high tibial osteotomy. Five consecutive patients were retrospectively reviewed. In all patients the alignment had collapsed into excessive varus or valgus and leg length discrepancy was present. The leg length discrepancy, malalignment, and nonunion were treated simultaneously with distraction. Union was achieved by the time of fixator removal, which averaged 4.4 months. The Hospital for Special Surgery knee score significantly improved from 42 to 89. The mechanical axis deviation significantly improved by 5 cm. The coronal plane deformity significantly improved by 13 degrees, and leg length discrepancy improved significantly from 2.3 to 0.5 cm. Metaphyseal bone stock increased by 43%, and the Insall-Salvati ratio increased from 1.1 to 1.2 and remained within normal limits. All patients were satisfied with the procedure, and none have had or need a total knee replacement at an average followup of 4 years. Distraction osteogenesis of nonunion after high tibial osteotomy is a minimally invasive and successful procedure. It leads to bony union with correction of deformity and leg length discrepancy and prevents the need for total knee replacement at intermediate-term followup. The increase in metaphyseal bone stock may make total knee replacement technically easier.

Open reduction and internal fixation of high-energy tibial plateau fractures

Proximal tibial articular fractures are caused by a variety of mechanisms and are characterized by numerous distinct fracture patterns. Surgical treatment for other than minimally displaced or nondisplaced fractures is recommended to restore joint congruity and limb alignment, and to allow early, stable, knee motion.

Nonarticular proximal tibia fractures: treatment options and decision making

Nonarticular proximal-third fractures account for 5% to 11% of tibial shaft injuries and occur as a result of a variety of mechanisms. Treatment is more challenging than for more distal fractures, and the rates of compartment syndrome and arterial injury are higher, especially for displaced fractures. Closed management often leads to varus malunion, especially when the fibula is intact. Closed treatment should therefore be reserved for nondisplaced or minimally displaced fractures with little soft-tissue injury. Plating of the proximal tibia has become a less popular alternative because of the high incidence of infection and fixation failure. However, judicious use of lateral plates as an adjunct to medial external fixation in comminuted fractures can be effective. External fixation remains the most versatile method. It is indicated for fractures with short proximal fragments and in cases of extensive soft-tissue injury that would preclude use of other surgical techniques. Temporary joint-spanning external fixation has a role in the initial management of certain fracture patterns, particularly when accompanied by severe soft-tissue injury. Although intramedullary nailing can lead to valgus malunion in a sizable percentage of patients with this injury, it can be useful for stabilizing fractures with proximal fragments longer than 5 to 6 cm. Placing the entry portal more proximal and lateral, locking in extension, and using specific techniques, such as blocking screws, can improve alignment after nailing. Use of an algorithm that takes into account the severity of soft-tissue injury, the length of the fracture fragment, and the degree of fracture stability allows effective decision making among current treatment techniques.

Safe placement of proximal tibial transfixation wires with respect to intracapsular penetration

OBJECTIVES

To determine the safe zone for transfixation wires in the proximal tibia to avoid intracapsular penetration.

METHODS

The material consisted of five fresh cadaver knees (two paired) and seven knees of volunteer subjects (three paired). High-resolution magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) was performed on each knee after distension with a gadolinium solution. The distance d from the subchondral bone to the insertion of the reflected joint capsule was measured. Selected cadaver knees were then anatomically sectioned to correlate the MRI findings with anatomic measurements.

RESULTS

On the anteromedial side of the knee, the distance from the reflected joint capsule to the subchondral bone was less than eleven millimeters in all specimens except one. Posteromedially, d was smaller and ranged from two to four millimeters. On the lateral side of the knee anterior to the proximal tibiofibular joint, this distance ranged from six to nine millimeters. In all knees but two, d was greatest at the posterior aspect of the proximal tibiofibular joint, ranging from eight to thirteen millimeters. In one volunteer knee, the septum that separates the knee joint from the proximal tibiofibular joint was either torn or attenuated, resulting in complete communication between these two synovial cavities.

CONCLUSIONS

Proximal tibial transfixation wires away from the tibiofibular joint are likely to be extraarticular if kept greater than fourteen millimeters from the subchondral bone. In the region of the proximal tibiofibular joint, a safe distance is unclear because it is difficult to know preoperatively which knee has a torn septum.