Open reduction internal fixation of a pelvic malunion through an anterior approach

Treatment of unstable pelvic fractures with double INFIX

BACKGROUND

This study investigated the clinical efficacy of Double INFIX for the treatment of unstable pelvic fractures.

METHODS

We performed a retrospective analysis of 23 patients with unstable pelvic fractures treated using the Double INFIX minimally invasive technique. The cohort included five cases of Tile B1 type, eight cases of B2 type, six cases of B3 type, three cases of C1 type and one case of type C2. Pre- and postoperative evaluations included standardised pelvic serial films and three-dimensional CT scans. Key observational indicators were fracture reduction quality (assessed using Matta's criteria), fracture healing, functional recovery (evaluated with the Majeed function assessment criteria), and incidence of complications.

RESULTS

The mean follow-up duration was 24.48 ± 1.78 months. The average fracture healing time was 4.00 ± 1.41 months, and the average time for removal of fixation was 7.43 ± 1.75 months. Repeat imaging at 12 months postoperatively using Matta's criteria showed eight cases with excellent results (52.17%), 13 cases with good results (34.78%), three cases with fair results (13.04%), and no cases with poor results. The combined excellent and good rate was 86.96%, whereas the fair rate was 13.04%. The average Majeed hip joint function score at the final follow-up was 95.04 ± 1.72. Postoperative complications included meralgia paresthetica in two cases (8.7%) and sacrococcygeal discomfort in three patients when lying flat.

CONCLUSION

Double INFIX is a minimally invasive treatment technique with adequate clinical efficacy for managing unstable pelvic fractures.

Pelvic Malunion: A Systematic Review, Dichotomy of Definitions and Treatment

Background and Objectives: Pelvic nonunion and malunion have been documented as rare complications in pelvic fractures and literature describing these topics is severely limited. Articles dedicated solely to pelvic malunion are nearly nonexistent. We conducted a literature search with the goal of providing a summary of the definition, causes, treatment strategies, and outcomes of pelvic malunion correction. Materials and Methods: An initial review of the literature was performed using the PubMed, ScienceDirect, and Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews databases. Search terms used were “malunion” AND “pelvic” OR “pelvis”. Duplicate articles, non-English language articles without translations available and non-human subject studies were excluded. Results: Eleven original publications were found describing experiences with pelvic malunion. Seven of the articles were exclusively dedicated to the topic of pelvic fracture malunion, and only two reported on a series of patients treated for malunion with variably staged procedures. Most reports define pelvic pain as the main indication for surgical correction, along with gait disturbance, standing or sitting imbalance, and urinary or sexual dysfunction. Radiographically, vertical displacement of one to two centimeters and rotation of the hemipelvis of fifteen degrees or more have been described in defining malunion. No treatment algorithms exist, and each patient is treated with a unique work-up and operative plan due to the complexity of the problem. Only one series reported a patient satisfaction rate of 75% following malunion treatment. Conclusions: Pelvic malunion is a rare complication of pelvic ring injury and is seldom discussed in the literature. We found two small case series reporting exclusively on malunion treatment and complications. While some of the combination studies made the distinction in the diagnosis of malunion and nonunion, they rarely differentiated the treatment outcomes between the two categories. This paper describes pelvic malunion and highlights the need for more research into surgical outcomes of treatment specifically regarding functionality, patient satisfaction, and recurrence of preoperative symptoms.

A novel radiological projection of the pelvis to evaluate the sitting imbalance in pelvis nonunions and malunions

INTRODUCTION

Inadequate initial management of unstable pelvic injuries is usually associated with a fracture non-union and/or mal-union. Complete clinical and imaging evaluation is mandatory for a correct preoperative planning. Among other symptoms, sitting discomfort may arise from asymmetry of the ischial tuberosities or pressure from a prominent bony projection. Conventional radiographs are usually taken with the individual in a supine position and not in position where the symptoms are referred. We attempted to define a new radiological projection different than the regular pelvis views to study the position of pelvis of a normal person in sitting position. The second objective was to demonstrate its utility in the evaluation of a pelvic deformity.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

Fifteen healthy individuals were evaluated with a radiological projection in a sitting position. One patient with a vertically migrated pelvis nonunion was also evaluated with the same radiological protocol.

RESULTS

In each volunteer's radiological study, a parallel line could be drawn between the sitting table and both distal aspects of the ischial tuberosities, sacral alas and superior aspect of the iliac wings. A plumb line perpendicular to the above mentioned ones could be drawn uniting the vertebras' spinous processes. A 90⁰ line intersection confirms the absence of deformity. In the pathological case, a pseudo scoliosis of the thoracolumbar spine is detected trying to compensate the pelvis obliquity and maintain equilibrium.

CONCLUSIONS

We determined normal and pathological radiological features in the sitting imbalance of the pelvic in the anteroposterior plane of the pelvis. The study helps to understand the biomechanics and compensation of the pelvis to define surgical indications and predict post correction anatomy.

Pelvic post-traumatic asymmetry: Assessment and sequenced treatment

The most common cause of post-traumatic pelvic asymmetry is, by far, initial nonoperative treatment.

Open reduction and internal fixation of unstable pelvic fractures are recommended to avoid pelvic nonunion or subsequent structural deformities.

The most common symptom is pelvic pain. Pelvic instability is another symptom, as well as persistent urogenital problems and neurological sequelae.

Preoperative evaluation of these patients requires careful clinical and functional assessment, in addition to a complete radiological study.

Surgical treatment of pelvic fracture nonunions is technically demanding and has potentially serious complications.

We have developed a new classification that modifies and completes Mears and Velyvis’s classification in which we highlight two types of post-traumatic sequelae with different clinical conditions and whose basic differentiating element is whether pelvic deformity is present or not. Based on this classification, we have established our strategy of surgical treatment.

Cite this article: EFORT Open Rev 2018;3 DOI: 10.1302/2058-5241.3.170069.

Treatment and outcomes of pelvic malunions and nonunions: a systematic review

Although acute management of pelvic fractures and their long-term functional outcome have been widely documented, important information regarding malunion and nonunion of these fractures is sparse. Despite their relative rarity, malunions and nonunions cause disabling symptoms and have major socioeconomic implications. We analyzed the factors predisposing a pelvic injury to develop malunion/nonunion, the clinical presentation of these complications, and the efficacy of the reported operative protocols in 437 malunions/nonunions of 25 clinical studies. Treatment of these demanding complications appeared effective in the majority of the cases: overall union rates averaged 86.1%, pain relief as much as 93%, patient satisfaction 79%, and return to a preinjury level of activities 50%. Nevertheless, the patient should be informed about the incidence of perioperative complications, including neurologic injury (5.3%), symptomatic vein thrombosis (5.0%), pulmonary embolism (1.9%), and deep wound infection (1.6%). For a successful outcome, a thorough preoperative plan and methodical operative intervention are essential. In establishing effective evidence-based future clinical practice, the introduction of multicenter networks of pelvic trauma management appears a necessity.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level IV, therapeutic study. See Guidelines for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

Skeletal deformity after anterior external fixation of the pelvis

OBJECTIVE

To study the deformity of acutely injured unstable pelves before and after emergent application of an anterior external fixator.

DESIGN

Retrospective.

SETTING

Large pelvic fracture referral practice.

PATIENTS

Eleven of 151 patients referred to our institution after emergent application of an external fixator by the referring orthopaedist before transfer who were hemodynamically unstable and had a mechanically unstable pelvic injury with pre-external fixator radiographs and post-external fixator radiographs adequate to determine pelvic deformity.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS

We reviewed all available radiographs both before and after placement of the external fixator (the anterior-posterior, inlet, outlet, and computed tomography), determining whether the external fixator improved or worsened the deformity.

RESULTS

Although many deformities existed, we found that application of an anterior frame consistently worsened this deformity. Seven of the 11 patients (64%) had worsening of the posterior cephalad translation or posterior diastasis despite apparent improvement anteriorly on the anterior-posterior radiograph. "External fixator deformity," defined as increased flexion and/or internal rotation of the hemipelvis, also occurred in 8 of 11 patients (73%). After placement of the external fixator, all patients displayed greater than 1 cm of either posterior cephalad translation or posterior diastasis (average 3.4 cm, range 1.3-4.6 cm).

CONCLUSIONS

Due to the forces placed on the pelvis during application of an anterior external fixator by the surgeon, an external fixator deformity may occur (flexed and internally rotated hemipelvis). Furthermore, most patients had an increase in posterior cephalad translation or posterior diastasis with placement of an external fixator. The surgeon should be aware of the potential of increasing the pelvic deformity when applying an emergent anterior external fixator.

Two-stage surgical procedure for treating pelvic malunions

When surgically treated, pelvic-ring deformities due to post-traumatic malunions in adults usually require invasive three-stage (prone/supine/prone or supine/prone/supine) procedures. A standardised two-stage prone/supine procedure was developed by the authors. Technical points and first clinical results are presented. Malunuions related to Tile B and C types of fracture were successfully corrected.