Rate-dependent effects of the class III antiarrhythmic drug almokalant on refractoriness in the pig

Novel pharmacological targets for the rhythm control management of atrial fibrillation

Atrial fibrillation (AF) is a growing clinical problem associated with increased morbidity and mortality. Development of safe and effective pharmacological treatments for AF is one of the greatest unmet medical needs facing our society. In spite of significant progress in non-pharmacological AF treatments (largely due to the use of catheter ablation techniques), anti-arrhythmic agents (AADs) remain first line therapy for rhythm control management of AF for most AF patients. When considering efficacy, safety and tolerability, currently available AADs for rhythm control of AF are less than optimal. Ion channel inhibition remains the principal strategy for termination of AF and prevention of its recurrence. Practical clinical experience indicates that multi-ion channel blockers are generally more optimal for rhythm control of AF compared to ion channel-selective blockers. Recent studies suggest that atrial-selective sodium channel block can lead to safe and effective suppression of AF and that concurrent inhibition of potassium ion channels may potentiate this effect. An important limitation of the ion channel block approach for AF treatment is that non-electrical factors (largely structural remodeling) may importantly determine the generation of AF, so that "upstream therapy", aimed at preventing or reversing structural remodeling, may be required for effective rhythm control management. This review focuses on novel pharmacological targets for the rhythm control management of AF.

Atrial-selective sodium channel block strategy to suppress atrial fibrillation: ranolazine versus propafenone

Ranolazine has been shown to produce atrial-selective depression of sodium channel-dependent parameters and suppress atrial fibrillation (AF) in a variety of experimental models. The present study contrasts the effects of ranolazine and those of a clinically used anti-AF class IC agent, propafenone. Electrophysiological and anti-AF effects of propafenone and ranolazine were compared at clinically relevant concentrations (i.e., 0.3-1.5 and 1-10 μM, respectively) in canine isolated coronary-perfused atrial and ventricular preparations. Transmembrane action potential and pseudo-ECG were recorded. Both ranolazine and propafenone produced atrial-selective prolongation of action potential duration. Propafenone depressed sodium channel-mediated parameters [maximum rate of rise of the action potential upstroke (V(max)), conduction time, and diastolic threshold of excitation] and induced postrepolarization refractoriness to a greater degree than ranolazine, and these effects, unlike those induced by ranolazine, were not or only mildly atrial-selective at normal rates (cycle length 500 ms). At fast pacing rates, however, the effects of propafenone on V(max) and conduction time became atrial-selective, because of the elimination of diastolic interval in atria, but not in ventricles. Propafenone (1.5 μM) and ranolazine (10.0 μM) were effective in preventing the initiation of persistent acetylcholine-mediated AF (6/7 and 9/11 atria, respectively), its termination (8/10 and 8/12 atria, respectively), and subsequent reinduction (8/8 and 7/8 atria, respectively). Thus, propafenone and ranolazine both suppress AF, but ranolazine, unlike propafenone, does it with minimal effects on ventricular myocardium, suggesting a reduced potential for promoting ventricular arrhythmias.

AZD1305 exerts atrial predominant electrophysiological actions and is effective in suppressing atrial fibrillation and preventing its reinduction in the dog

Recent development of drugs for the treatment of atrial fibrillation (AF) has focused on atrial selective agents. We examined the atrioventricular differences in sodium channel block of the antiarrhythmic agent AZD1305 in atria and ventricles of anesthetized dogs in vivo, canine isolated arterially perfused preparations in vitro, and isolated myocytes using whole-cell patch-clamp techniques. AZD1305 did not change heart rate or blood pressure in vivo but prolonged action potential duration and increased effective refractory period, diastolic threshold of excitation, and conduction time preferentially in atria both in vitro and in vivo. AZD1305 reduced the maximum rate of rise of the action potential upstroke (V(max)) predominantly in atria (-51% +/- 10% in atria vs. -31% +/- 23% in ventricles; 3 microM; cycle length = 500 milliseconds). Fast sodium current (I(Na)) was blocked by AZD1305 to a greater degree in atrial versus ventricular myocytes (particularly tonic inhibition). In coronary-perfused right atria, AZD1305 very effectively prevented induction of persistent acetylcholine-mediated AF and, in a different set of atria, terminated persistent AF (in 5 of 5 and 7 of 8 atria, respectively). In conclusion, AZD1305 exerts atrial predominant sodium channel-blocking effects in vitro and in vivo and effectively suppresses AF.

New developments in atrial antiarrhythmic drug therapy

Atrial fibrillation (AF) is a growing clinical problem associated with increased morbidity and mortality. Currently available antiarrhythmic drugs (AADs), although highly effective in acute cardioversion of paroxysmal AF, are generally only moderately successful in long-term maintenance of sinus rhythm. The use of AADs is often associated with an increased risk of ventricular proarrhythmia, extracardiac toxicity, and exacerbation of concomitant diseases such as heart failure. AF is commonly associated with intracardiac and extracardiac disease, which can modulate the efficacy and safety of AAD therapy. In light of the multifactorial intracardiac and extracardiac causes of AF generation, current development of anti-AF agents is focused on modulation of ion channel activity as well as on upstream therapies that reduce structural substrates. The available data indicate that multiple ion channel blockers exhibiting potent inhibition of peak I(Na) with relatively rapid unbinding kinetics, as well as inhibition of late I(Na) and I(Kr), may be preferable for the management of AF when considering both safety and efficacy.

New pharmacological strategies for the treatment of atrial fibrillation

Atrial fibrillation (AF) is a growing clinical problem, increasing in prevalence as the population of the United States and countries around the world ages. Intensive research aimed at improving prevention, diagnosis, and treatment of AF is ongoing. Although the use and efficacy of catheter ablation-based approaches in AF treatment have increased significantly in the last decade, pharmacological agents remain the first-line therapy for rhythm management of AF. Currently available anti-AF agents are generally only moderately effective and associated with extracardiac toxicity and/or a risk for development of life-threatening ventricular arrhythmias. Included among current investigational strategies for improving the effectiveness and safety of anti-AF drugs is the development of (1) Agents that produce atrial-specific or predominant inhibition of I(Kur), I(K-ACh), or I(Na); (2) "Upstream therapies" that effect nonion channel targets that reduce atrial structural remodeling, hypertrophy, dilatation, inflammation, oxidative injury, etc; (3) Derivatives of "old" anti-AF drugs with an improved safety pharmacological profile; and (4) Gap junction therapy aimed at improving conduction without affecting sodium channels. This review focuses on new pharmacological approaches under investigation for the treatment of AF.

Atrial-selective sodium channel block for the treatment of atrial fibrillation

The pharmacological approach to therapy of atrial fibrillation (AF) is often associated with adverse effects resulting in the development of ventricular arrhythmias. As a consequence, much of the focus in recent years has been on development of atrial-selective agents. Atrial-selective sodium channel blockers have recently been shown to exist and be useful in the management of AF. This review summarizes the available data relative to current therapies, focusing on our understanding of the actions of atrial selective sodium channel blockers in suppressing and preventing the induction of AF and electrophysiological properties that confer atrial-selectivity to these antifibrillatory drugs.

Atrial-selective sodium channel block as a strategy for suppression of atrial fibrillation

Antiarrhythmic drug therapy remains the principal approach for suppression of atrial fibrillation (AF) and flutter (AFl) and prevention of their recurrence. Among the current strategies for suppression of AF/AFl is the development of antiarrhythmic agents that preferentially affect atrial, rather than ventricular electrical parameters. Inhibition of the ultrarapid delayed rectifier potassium current (IKur), present in the atria, but not in the ventricles, is an example of an atrial-selective approach. Our recent study examined the hypothesis that sodium channel characteristics differ between atrial and ventricular cells and that atrial-selective sodium channel block is another effective strategy for the management of AF. We have demonstrated very significant differences in the inactivation characteristics of atrial versus ventricular sodium channels and a striking atrial selectivity for the action of ranolazine, an inactivated-state sodium channel blocker, to produce use-dependent block of the sodium channels, leading to depression of excitability, development of post-repolarization refractoriness (PRR), and suppression of AF. Lidocaine and chronic amiodarone, both predominantly inactivated-state sodium channel blockers, also produced a preferential depression of sodium channel-dependent parameters (VMax conduction velocity, diastolic threshold of excitation, and PRR) in the atria. Propafenone, a predominantly open-state sodium channel blocker, produced similar changes of electrophysiological parameters, which were was not atrial-selective. The ability of ranolazine, chronic amiodarone, and propafenone to prolong the atrial action potential potentiated their ability to suppress AF in coronary-perfused canine atrial preparations.

IN CONCLUSION

Our data demonstrate important differences in the inactivation characteristics of atrial versus ventricular sodium channels and a striking atrial selectivity for the action of agents like ranolazine to produce use-dependent block of sodium channels leading to suppression of AF. Our findings suggest that atrial-selective sodium channel block may be a valuable strategy to combat AF.

How Do Atrial-Selective Drugs Differ From Antiarrhythmic Drugs Currently Used in the Treatment of Atrial Fibrillation?

Current pharmacologic strategies for the management of Atrial fibrillation (AF) include use of 1) sodium channel blockers, which are contraindicated in patients with coronary artery or structural heart disease because of their potent effect to slow conduction in the ventricles, 2) potassium channel blockers, which predispose to acquired long QT and Torsade de Pointes arrhythmias because of their potent effect to prolong ventricular repolarization, and 3) mixed ion channel blockers such as amiodarone, which are associated with multi-organ toxicity. Accordingly, recent studies have focused on agents that selectively affect the atria but not the ventricles. Several Atrial-selective approaches have been proposed for the management of AF, including inhibition of the Atrial-specific ultra rapid delayed rectified potassium current (IKur), acetylcholine-regulated inward rectifying potassium current (IK-ACh), or connexin-40 (Cx40). All three are largely exclusive to atria. Recent studies have proposed that an Atrial-selective depression of sodium channel-dependent parameters with agents such as ranolazine may be an alternative approach capable of effectively suppressing AF without increasing susceptibility to ventricular arrhythmias. Clinical evidence for Cx40 modulation or IK-ACh inhibition are lacking at this time. The available data suggest that Atrial-selective approaches involving a combination of INa, IKur, IKr, and, perhaps, Ito block may be more effective in the management of AF than pure IKur or INa block. The anti-AF efficacy of the Atrial-selective/predominant agents appears to be similar to that of conventionally used anti-AF agents, with the major apparent difference being that the latter are associated with ventricular arrhythmogenesis and extra cardiac toxicity.

Low-frequency oscillations of atrial fibrillation cycle length in goats: characterization and potentiation by class III antiarrhythmic almokalant

BACKGROUND

In chronically fibrillating goats, low-frequency oscillations (LFOs) of atrial fibrillation cycle length (AFCL) with a deceleration-acceleration sequence have been observed. The present investigation characterized such oscillations in control conditions and during the infusion of class III antiarrhythmic almokalant, trying to understand their mechanism and possible relevance.

METHODS AND RESULTS

The study was performed on fibrillating goats instrumented with multiple electrodes. LFOs were characterized in 64-s recording samples (1 electrode/atrium) before and during almokalant infusion. Filtering was applied to the raw sequence of AFCL. LFOs were completely random, non-flutterlike and potentiated by almokalant, as evinced by increases in oscillation frequency, duration and amplitude. As compared with nonoscillation periods, the upper part of LFOs displayed an increase in single (84.0 +/- 11.4% vs 72.5 +/- 12.9%) and a reduction in double spikes (12.1 +/- 8.3% vs 20.2 +/- 8.6%), suggesting an improvement of propagation. This was supported by the features of activation maps during LFOs: fast conduction, few wave fronts and many linking beats.

CONCLUSIONS

Chronically fibrillating goats exhibit random LFOs, which are enhanced by almokalant. The improvement of propagation during oscillations suggests an increase in the excitable period/excitable gap. These findings raise the question of LFOs involvement in atrial fibrillation termination.

Effects of acute systemic endothelin receptor blockade on cardiac electrophysiology in vivo

BQ-123, a selective endothelin-A receptor antagonist, has been demonstrated to suppress arrhythmias. However, the role of physiologic levels of endogenous endothelin-1 (ET-1) with respect to electrophysiologic properties of the heart is unknown. BQ-123 (0.45, 0.9, 1.8, 3.6, 7.2, and 14.4 microg/kg/min; n = 10) or saline (control, n = 5) was administered IV for 15 minutes of continuous-rate infusion at incremental doses to anesthetized normal pigs. BQ-123 had no effect on PR and QT interval, QRS duration, intraatrial and AV nodal conduction time as well as the atrial, AV nodal, and ventricular effective refractory periods. As compared with baseline, BQ-123 at 7.2 and 14.4 microg/kg/min caused an increase in heart rate (99 +/- 17 versus 110 +/- 14 and 118 +/- 14 bpm, respectively; P < 0.05), shortened sinus node recovery time (818 +/- 165 versus 641 +/- 69 and 609 +/- 74 milliseconds, respectively; P < 0.05) and decreased mean arterial pressure at 14.4 microg/kg/min (95 +/- 18 versus 80 +/- 11 mm Hg; P < 0.05). We conclude that in the normal pig, physiologic levels of ET-1 have no effect on conduction properties of atrial, AV nodal, or Purkinje fibers. However, antagonism of ET-1 by BQ-123 unmasks the effect of ET-1 on maintenance of vasomotor tone, which in turn may affect heart rate and sinus node automaticity in the intact pig.

Differential recovery of action potential duration and HERG currents from the effects of two methanesulfonamide class III antiarrhythmic agents, KCB-328 and dofetilide

A novel pure class III antiarrhythmic agent, 1-(2-amino-4-methanesulfonamidophenoxy)-2-[N-(3,4-dimethoxyphen-ethyl)-N-methylamino]ethane hydrochloride (KCB-328) prolongs action potential duration (APD) by blocking the rapid component delayed rectifier K+ current (IKr). However, KCB-328 manifests little of the reverse frequency dependence (RFD) that is a general characteristic of class III antiarrhythmic agents. We have studied the onset and recovery kinetics of KCB-328 and dofetilide on APD in guinea-pig papillary muscle and on human ether-a-go-go-related gene (HERG) channel, which encodes IKr, expressed in Xenopus oocytes. KCB-328 (1 microM) and dofetilide (0.1 microM) progressively increased the duration of post-rest AP at 1-Hz stimulation, with onset time constants of 6.4 +/- 0.6 seconds and 20.7 +/- 1.8 seconds, respectively. With a 100-second resting period, the effect of KCB-328 recovered by 70% with a time constant of 13.2 +/- 4.2 seconds, whereas that of dofetilide recovered only by 25%. Both drugs blocked activated HERG channels in a biexponential decay fashion, with faster time constants for KCB-328 (3 microM) than for dofetilide (0.3 microM). After a 300-second resting period, HERG current inhibited by KCB-328 was recovered more at depolarized membrane potentials than at hyperpolarized ones, with a time constant of 179.9 seconds during the rest at -60 mV. In contrast, recovery after dofetilide was negligible at all voltages tested. These results suggest that KCB-328 binds to IKr at a preferentially open state in a use-dependent manner, but that KCB-328 unbinds from the resting state more readily than dofetilide. The less striking RFD of KCB-328 than of dofetilide might be related to the faster recovery from its effect on IKr.

Impact directly over the cardiac silhouette is necessary to produce ventricular fibrillation in an experimental model of commotio cordis

OBJECTIVES

In an experimental model of sudden death from chest wall impact (commotio cordis), we sought to define the chest wall areas important in the initiation of ventricular fibrillation (VF).

BACKGROUND

Sudden death can result from an innocent chest blow by a baseball or other projectile. Observations in humans suggest that these lethal blows occur over the precordium. However, the precise location of impact relative to the risk of sudden death is unknown.

METHODS

Fifteen swine received 178 chest impacts with a regulation baseball delivered at 30 mph at three sites over the cardiac silhouette (i.e., directly over the center, base or apex of the left ventricle [LV]) and four noncardiac sites on the left and right chest wall. Chest blows were gated to the vulnerable portion of the cardiac cycle for the induction of VF.

RESULTS

Only chest impacts directly over the heart triggered VF (12 of 78: 15% vs. 0 of 100 for noncardiac sites: p < 0.0001). Blows over the center of the heart (7 of 23; 30%) were more likely to initiate VF than impacts at other precordial sites (5 of 55; 9%, p = 0.02). Peak LV pressures generated instantaneously by the chest impact were directly related to the risk of VF (p < 0.0006).

CONCLUSIONS

For nonpenetrating, low-energy chest blows to cause sudden death, impact must occur directly over the heart. Initiation of VF may be mediated by an abrupt and substantial increase in intracardiac pressure. Prevention of sudden death from chest blows during sports requires that protective equipment be designed to cover all portions of the chest wall that overlie the heart, even during body movements and positional changes that may occur with athletic activities.

D-Sotalol: death by the SWORD or deserving of further consideration for clinical use?

D-Sotalol is the dextro-rotatory isomer of sotalol and a class III anti-arrhythmic. D-Sotalol prolongs cardiac repolarisation by inhibiting the fast component of the delayed outward rectifying potassium channel. In animal studies, D-sotalol has been shown to be more effective in prolonging atrial, rather than ventricular, action potentials, suggesting that D-sotalol may be more effective against supra-ventricular than ventricular arrhythmias. Furthermore, in animal studies, D-sotalol induces after-depolarisations, which are predictors of pro-arrhythmic activity. D-Sotalol shows little or no reverse use dependence in animal and humans and has slow offset kinetics. This suggests that, in addition to being a preventative treatment for arrhythmias, D-sotalol may be effective at the start or during arrhythmia. As D-sotalol does not block the slow component of the delayed outward rectifying potassium channel, which is activated by the sympathetic nervous system, D-sotalol will not protect against sympathetic hyperactivity. D-Sotalol also has no effect on the K(ATP) channel, which is activated in ischaemia to shorten the action potential. Thus D-sotalol is less effective in ischaemia. Anti-arrhythmic activity with D-sotalol has been demonstrated in dog models of ventricular tachycardia and sudden death. Arrhythmias with D-sotalol have been demonstrated in an ischaemic guinea-pig ventricle model in the absence of action potentials. D-Sotalol is a weak beta-adrenoceptor antagonist and may also be a positive inotrope. In humans, D-sotalol has 100% systemic oral bioavailability, a terminal half-life of 7.2 h and is mainly excreted unchanged in the urine. Preliminary, mainly hospital-based, clinical trials showed that D-sotalol was effective in a variety of supraventricular and ventricular arrhythmias. However, a large clinical trial of D-sotalol as a preventative treatment for arrhythmias and sudden death after myocardial infarction, the SWORD trial, was terminated early because of increased mortality with D-sotalol. The group at greatest risk was those with a remote myocardial infarction and relatively good left ventricular function, the group that showed the lowest mortality when untreated. It is assumed that excessive prolongation of the action potential leading to pro-arrhythmia with D-sotalol, underlies the increased risk of death. However, there is little objective evidence in the SWORD trial to support this. Obviously D-sotalol should not be used in humans with a remote myocardial infarction and relatively good left ventricular function. D-Sotalol could still be considered for short-term hospital use in resistant arrhythmias and for longer-term use to prevent atrial fibrillation in those with remote myocardial infarction and poor left ventricular function.