Metabolic effects of temocapril in hypertensive patients with diabetes mellitus type 2

Potential Protective Role of Blood Pressure-Lowering Drugs on the Balance between Hemostasis and Fibrinolysis in Hypertensive Patients at Rest and During Exercise

In patients with hypertension, the triad represented by endothelial dysfunction, platelet hyperactivity, and altered fibrinolytic function disturbs the equilibrium between hemostasis and fibrinolysis and translates into a hypercoagulable state, which underlies the risk of thrombotic complications. This article reviews the scientific evidence regarding some biological effects of antihypertensive drugs, which can protect patients from the adverse consequences of hypertensive disease, improving endothelial function, enhancing antioxidant activity, and restoring equilibrium between hemostatic and fibrinolytic factors. These protective effects appear not to be mediated through blood pressure reduction and are not shared by all molecules of the same pharmacological class.

Blood pressure lowering efficacy of angiotensin converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitors for primary hypertension

BACKGROUND

ACE inhibitors are widely prescribed for hypertension so it is essential to determine and compare their effects on blood pressure (BP), heart rate and withdrawals due to adverse effects (WDAE).

OBJECTIVES

To quantify the dose-related systolic and/or diastolic BP lowering efficacy of ACE inhibitors versus placebo in the treatment of primary hypertension.

SEARCH STRATEGY

We searched CENTRAL (The Cochrane Library 2007, Issue 1), MEDLINE (1966 to February 2007), EMBASE (1988 to February 2007) and reference lists of articles.

SELECTION CRITERIA

Double-blind, randomized, controlled trials evaluating the BP lowering efficacy of fixed-dose monotherapy with an ACE inhibitor compared with placebo for a duration of 3 to 12 weeks in patients with primary hypertension.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Two authors independently assessed the risk of bias and extracted data. Study authors were contacted for additional information. WDAE information was collected from the trials.

MAIN RESULTS

Ninety two trials evaluated the dose-related trough BP lowering efficacy of 14 different ACE inhibitors in 12 954 participants with a baseline BP of 157/101 mm Hg. The data do not suggest that any one ACE inhibitor is better or worse at lowering BP. A dose of 1/8 or 1/4 of the manufacturer's maximum recommended daily dose (Max) achieved a BP lowering effect that was 60 to 70% of the BP lowering effect of Max. A dose of 1/2 Max achieved a BP lowering effect that was 90% of Max. ACE inhibitor doses above Max did not significantly lower BP more than Max. Combining the effects of 1/2 Max and higher doses gives an estimate of the average trough BP lowering efficacy for ACE inhibitors as a class of drugs of -8 mm Hg for SBP and -5 mm Hg for DBP. ACE inhibitors reduced BP measured 1 to 12 hours after the dose by about 11/6 mm Hg.

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

There are no clinically meaningful BP lowering differences between different ACE inhibitors. The BP lowering effect of ACE inhibitors is modest; the magnitude of trough BP lowering at one-half the manufacturers' maximum recommended dose and above is -8/-5 mm Hg. Furthermore, 60 to 70% of this trough BP lowering effect occurs with recommended starting doses. The review did not provide a good estimate of the incidence of harms associated with ACE inhibitors because of the short duration of the trials and the lack of reporting of adverse effects in many of the trials.

Changes in Plasma Lipids During Renin-Angiotensin System Blockade by Combination Therapy (Enalapril Plus Valsartan) in Patients With Diabetes and Hypertension

There is experimental evidence of an interaction between the angiotensin system and lipid metabolism. The aim of this study was to evaluate whether a block of the angiotensin system achieved both by ACE inhibition and angiotensin II-AT1 receptor blockade could affect the plasma lipid profile and, if so, what relationship exists between these possible changes and glucose metabolism and blood pressure. In 50 patients with type 2 diabetes and hypertension, treated with diabetes drugs and enalapril, we evaluated the glycemic and lipid profile together with the HOMA insulin-resistance index, blood pressure and microalbuminuria at baseline and 3 months after the addition of valsartan. At the second evaluation, blood pressure was reduced as expected, whereas the glycemic profile, the HOMA index, and the body mass index were unchanged. Total cholesterol, LDL-c, and apoprotein B were reduced during combination therapy (P = 0.003, P = 0.001, and P = 0.004, respectively), plasma HDL-c was slightly though significantly increased (P = 0.024), whereas apoprotein A and triglyceride levels did not change. After adjustment for the insulin resistance index and for blood pressure, the reduction of LDL-c and apoprotein B and the increase in HDL-c remained significant. The variation in lipid profile was not related to the changes in blood pressure. Moreover, the addition of valsartan to enalapril was associated with a reduction in microalbuminuria, which remained significant after adjustment for LDL-c or blood pressure changes. Thus, the greater degree of renin-angiotensin system blockade or specific pharmacodynamic effects of valsartan could account for the changes in plasma lipid profile observed in this study.

Losartan and perindopril effects on plasma plasminogen activator inhibitor-1 and fibrinogen in hypertensive type 2 diabetic patients

BACKGROUND

This study compared the effects of losartan and perindopril on plasma plasminogen activator inhibitor-1 (PAI-1) and fibrinogen in hypertensive type 2 diabetic patients.

METHODS

We studied 85 nonsmoking outpatients, aged 46 to 64 years, with mild to moderate essential hypertension (diastolic blood pressure [BP] > 90 and < 110 mm Hg) and well controlled type 2 diabetes mellitus. After a 4-week washout placebo period, patients were randomized to received perindopril 4 mg once daily (n = 42) or losartan 50 mg once daily (n = 43) for 12 weeks according to a double-blind, parallel-group design. At the end of the placebo and active treatment periods, BP was measured and plasma PAI-1 and fibrinogen were evaluated.

RESULTS

Both perindopril and losartan reduced systolic and diastolic BP values (-16/15 mm Hg and -15/14, respectively; P < .001 v placebo), with no difference between the two treatments. Plasma PAI-1 was reduced by perindopril (-10 ng/dL, P = .028 v placebo) but not by losartan (+4 ng/dL, NS), the difference between the two treatments being statistically significant (P < .01). Plasma fibrinogen showed no significant change with both drugs, although a decreasing trend was noted with perindopril.

CONCLUSIONS

These findings indicate that perindopril but not losartan decreases PAI-1 in hypertensive type 2 diabetic patients, which suggests that the PAI-1 lowering effect is unrelated with AT, receptor blockade and could rather be due to the fact that the endothelial receptors that mediate PAI-1 expression in response to angiotensin II are not type 1 receptor subtypes. Different effects of the two drugs on the bradykinin system might also be implicated.

Impact of an ACE inhibitor and calcium antagonist on microalbuminuria and lipid subfractions in type 2 diabetes: a randomised, multi-centre pilot study

BACKGROUND

Microalbuminuria (MA) is associated with increased cardiovascular risk and lipid abnormalities in people with type 2 diabetes. ACE inhibitors and calcium channel blockers (CCBs) reduce MA and are neutral on total cholesterol and triglycerides. The effect of ACE inhibitors and CCBs on lipid subfractions such as Lp(a), apolipoprotein (apo) A1, apo B, and others, however, is unclear. The current study tests the hypothesis that a fixed-dose combination of an ACE inhibitor, benazepril (B) with the dihydropyridine CCB, amlodipine (A), will further reduce arterial pressure and reduce atherogenic lipid fractions compared to either agent alone.

DESIGN

A multicentre, randomised, open-label, parallel group design was used to study 27 participants with type 2 diabetes. Measurements for total cholesterol, high- and low-density lipoprotein (HDL and LDL), triglycerides, apo A1, apo B, Lp(a), MA, arterial pressure and creatinine clearance were obtained at baseline and at 12-week intervals during the 36 week study.

RESULTS

Arterial pressure was significantly reduced at 36 weeks in all three groups (P = 0.0078 for A, P = 0.0039 for B, and P = 0.0313 for A+B). MA was lowered in all groups with relatively greater reductions in the B (P < 0.05) and A+B groups (P < 0.03) vs A. An increase in mean HDL-cholesterol from baseline was noted in the B and A+B groups; P < 0.05), but not in the A group. A trend was also observed between the rise in HDL-cholesterol and the reduction in MA in the B and A+B groups. Additionally, only the B group exhibited a decrease in the median value of Lp(a) (P < 0.05).

CONCLUSION

These data support the concept that ACE inhibition with B reduces the atherogenic profile by decreasing Lp(a) and increasing HDL-cholesterol, the latter being correlated with reductions in MA. While A+B exhibited similar trends in lipid subfractions and MA as B, this group had the greatest reduction in systolic blood pressure of the three groups. Thus, use of A+B offers the benefits of a decreased atherogenic profile with a higher probably of achieving goal blood pressure as recommended by national guidelines.

Effect of antihypertensive therapy using enalapril or losartan on haemostatic markers in essential hypertension: a pilot prospective randomised double-blind parallel group trial

To test the hypothesis that the hypercoagulable state in hypertension is significantly altered by anti-hypertensive therapy, we conducted a pilot prospective randomised double-blind trial of 40 untreated hypertensive patients (30 males, mean age 59 years) who were treated with either enalapril (10-20 mg per day) or losartan (50-100 mg per day) for 8 weeks. Thrombogenicity was assessed by measurement of plasma fibrinogen, soluble P-selectin (an index of platelet activation), plasminogen activator inhibitor 1 (PAI-1, an index of fibrinolysis) and von Willebrand factor (an index of endothelial dysfunction). Baseline von Willebrand factor alone was significantly higher in untreated hypertensive patients compared to controls (P<0.001). Following 8 weeks treatment with enalapril (mean dose 17 mg/day) or losartan (mean dose 77 mg/day), there was a significant reduction in mean blood pressure from 169+/-11/94+/-8 mmHg (baseline) to 147+/-14/84+/-7 mmHg (post-treatment) (P<0.001). However, there were no statistically significant changes in the levels of haemostatic markers (von Willebrand factor, fibrinogen, s-Psel and PAI-1). Our pilot study confirms previous observations of endothelial dysfunction in hypertensives. However, plasma fibrinogen and indices of platelet activation, fibrinolysis or endothelial dysfunction were not significantly affected by antihypertensive treatment with enalapril or losartan, despite satisfactory blood pressure control.

Therapeutic potential of ACE inhibitors for the treatment of hypertension in Type 2 diabetes

Type 2 diabetes mellitus is associated with hypertension. If untreated, hypertension has a major impact on the clinical course of Type 2 diabetes and its vascular complications. In this review, we discuss rationale for the use of ACE inhibitors (ACEI) in hypertensive Type 2 diabetic patients and compare those theoretical assumptions with results of recent major clinical trials. Furthermore, possible directions for future clinical and experimental research are outlined. The RAS and its effector angiotensin II are important players in a number of cardiovascular and renal disorders. Recent evidence suggests that RAS and factors functionally linked to RAS are activated in Type 2 diabetes. Therefore, there is a theoretical basis for the use of ACEI in the treatment of hypertension in diabetic patients. Some recent studies reported superior outcome in patients treated with ACEI-based antihypertensive regimens compared with non-ACEI based treatments in reducing the risk of macrovascular disease (CAPPP, FACET, ABCD) or both micro- and macrovascular complications in Type 2 diabetes (HOPE). However, at least two of the large prospective studies discussed in this review (UKPDS 38, HOT), supported by results from previously published SHEP study, have recently suggested that the degree of reduction of blood pressure, rather than the choice of a particular class of antihypertensive agent, is associated with decreased risk of cardiovascular events. Studies focusing on renal end-points suggest that ACEI have a superior antiproteinuric effect than the other agents. However, whether ACEI are more nephroprotective, as assessed by the rate of decline in renal function, still remains to be elucidated. Despite promising results from recent trials, large numbers of patients progress despite ACEI treatment. Incomplete inhibition of the RAS may underlie this phenomenon. Treatment strategies that could enhance the degree of RAS inhibition represent one possible direction for clinical research in the near future. However, it is unlikely that the course of such a complex syndrome as Type 2 diabetes could be dramatically changed by just one class of antihypertensive agents. This goal is more likely to be achieved by multifactorial intervention, reflecting the complexity of metabolic syndrome. ACEI should be viewed as an important, but not the only, part of this complex approach.