Liver packing for uncontrolled hemorrhage: a reappraisal

Pelvic packing - status 2024

Patients with unstable hemodynamics and unstable pelvic ring injuries are still demanding patients regarding initial treatment and survival. Several concepts were reported during the last 30 years. Mechanical stabilization of the pelvis together with hemorrhage control offer the best treatment option in these patients. While pelvic ring stabilization using pelvic binders, external fixators and the pelvic C-clamp are the basis for mechanical stability of the pelvic ring, the optimal modality for pelvic bleeding control is still under discussion. Beside angioembolization (AE) and Resuscitative Endovascular Balloon Occlusion of the Aorta (REBOA), pelvic packing PP (predominantly extraperitoneal) with direct access to the pelvic bleeding sources, are potential options. The present overview represents the present status, results and the value of pelvic packing in treating these patients. Interpretation of these results must consider the difference between the initial European concept of pelvic ring stabilization followed by PP in contrast to the North American concept with a reduced rate of pelvic ring stabilizations.

CT imaging of clinically significant abdominopelvic injuries in the damage control surgery patient

PURPOSE

Damage Control Surgery (DCS) refers to a staged laparotomy performed in patients who have suffered severe blunt or penetrating abdominopelvic trauma with the goal of managing critical injuries while avoiding life threatening metabolic derangements. Within 24 h of the initial laparotomy, computed tomography (CT) is used to assess the full extent of injuries. The purpose of this study was to assess the incidence of clinically significant unknown abdominopelvic injuries which required further dedicated surgical or interventional radiology management and failed surgical repairs identified on CT following initial laparotomy.

METHODS

CT findings were correlated with surgical findings from the initial and subsequent staged laparotomy to determine known and unknown injuries. Frequency and percentage analyses was performed.

RESULTS

Out of 63 patients who underwent DCS with an open abdomen following initial laparotomy and subsequent CT within 24 h, a total of 13 clinically significant abdominopelvic injuries were identified in 12 patients. Seven clinically significant injuries were identified in seven patients (11.1% of patients) in surgically explored areas. Six clinically significant injuries were identified in six patients (9.5%) in surgically unexplored areas. Four instances of failed initial surgical repair were identified in four patients (6.3%) involving the liver and gastrointestinal tract. Overall, 23.8% of the DCS patient population had an actionable finding on the post laparotomy CT.

CONCLUSION

CT demonstrated value for identifying the extent of clinically significant abdominopelvic injuries and evidence of failed initial surgical repair, which informed surgical planning for subsequent laparotomy. The authors advocate for performing CT in post-DCS patients with an open abdomen as soon as possible following correction of metabolic and hemodynamic derangements.

Pack the chest: Damage control strategy for management in thoracic trauma

BACKGROUND

Damage control surgery aims to control hemorrhage and contamination in the operating room (OR) with definitive management of injuries delayed until normal physiology is restored in the intensive care unit (ICU). There are limited studies evaluating the use of damage control thoracotomy (DCT) in trauma, and the best method of temporary closure is unclear.

METHODS

A retrospective review of trauma patients at two level I trauma centers who underwent a thoracotomy operation was performed. Subjects who underwent a thoracotomy after 24 h, age less than 16, expired in the trauma bay, or in the OR prior to ICU admission were excluded. One-way ANOVA and Kruskal-Wallis test were used to compare continuous and categorical variables between DCT and definitive thoracotomy (DT) patients.

RESULTS

207 trauma patients underwent thoracotomy, 76 met our inclusion criteria. DCT was performed in 30 patients (39%), 46 (61 %) underwent DT operation. Techniques for temporizing the chest varied from skin closure with suture (8), adhesive dressing (5), towel clamps (2), or negative pressure devices (12). Compared to definitive closure, DCT had more derangements in HR, pH, (110 vs. 95, p = 0.04; 7.05 vs 7.24, p < 0.001), and injury severity score (41 vs 25, p < 0.001), and required more blood transfusions (40 vs 6, p < 0.001). Eleven (36.7 %) DCT patients survived to discharge compared to 38 patients (95.0 %) in the DT group. DCT showed significantly higher differences in cardiac arrest and unplanned returns to the OR rates. No differences were observed in ventilator days, or ICU length of stay.

CONCLUSIONS

DCT is a viable option for management of patients in extremis following thoracic trauma. DCT was associated with higher mortality rates, likely due to differences in injury and physiologic derangement. Despite this, DCT was associated with similar rates of complications, ICU stay, and ventilator days.

Damage control surgery: a constant evolution

The story of trauma resuscitation is similar to that of many other advances in medicine: described, forgotten, reinvented, ridiculed, and finally accepted. Even after acceptance, the concepts go through periods of neglect and indifference before they are tried and enhanced, till the next advance. Damage control, a strategy for management of critically injured or ill patients, is a prime example of this phenomenon. It reminds us of the famous words of Oliver Goldsmith in 1761: “for he who fights and runs away, will live to fight another day, but he who is in battle slain, will never rise and fight again”. Damage control was based on the recognition of the lethal triad of hypothermia, acidosis, and a coagulopathy resulting from massive blood loss, large-volume resuscitation and ischemia-reperfusion. It was an approach that J. Hogarth Pringle from Glasgow, Scotland, suggested in 1908 with his principles of compression and hepatic packing for control of venous hemorrhage from the injured liver: temporary, expeditious and effective. Packing, however, was rarely utilized during World War II and the Vietnam War because of the presumed risk of rebleeding with removal of the packs. The ever-difficult challenge of “non-surgical bleeding” from a coagulopathy due to massive hepatic injuries did, eventually, lead to a resurrection of the concept of perihepatic packing in the 1980s in civilian centers and became one of the initial steps in damage control for patients with severe and/or multiple intra-abdominal injuries.

Stereological Comparison of Imbibed Fibrinogen Gauze versus Simple Gauze in External Packing of Grade IV Liver Injury in Rats

Objective

To evaluate the effect of imbibed fibrinogen gauze on survival, bleeding and healing in liver trauma.

Methods

This animal experimental study was conducted on 20 adult male Sprague-Dawley rats; with a mean weight of 300±50 gram; divided into two groups. Grade IV injury was induced to the subjects' liver. Then, the bleeding site was packed with simple gauze in the control group, and imbibed fibrinogen gauze in the experimental group. All animals were re-evaluated for liver hemostasis 48 hours after the initial injury. Bleeding in the intra peritoneal cavity was measured using Tuberculosis Syringe in the first and second operations. Subjects were followed-up for 14 days. Eventually, the rats were sacrificed and their livers were sent to a lab for stereological assessment. Statistical comparisons were performed via Mann-Whitney U-test using SPSS. P-Values less than 0.05 were considered to be statistically significant.

Results

Half of the rats in the control group died, while all the rats in the imbibed fibrinogen gauze group survived after two weeks (p= 0.032). Bleeding in the imbibed fibrinogen gauze was significantly less than control group, 48 hours' post-surgery (p<0.001). According to the stereological results, granulation tissue in the imbibed fibrinogen gauze group were more than the control group (P= 0.032). Also, fibrosis in the imbibed fibrinogen gauze group were more than the control group (P= 0.014).

Conclusion

Our study indicated that imbibed fibrinogen gauze can potentially control liver bleeding and improve survival through increasing granulation tissue and fibrosis in injured liver.

Damage control surgery: current state and future directions

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Damage control surgery (DCS) represents a staged surgical approach to the treatment of critically injured trauma patients. Originally described in the context of hepatic trauma and postinjury-induced coagulopathy, the indications for DCS have expanded to the management of extra abdominal trauma and to the management of nontraumatic acute abdominal emergencies. Despite being an accepted treatment algorithm, DCS is based on a limited evidence with current concerns of the variability in practice indications, rates and adverse outcomes in poorly selected patient cohorts.

RECENT FINDINGS

Recent efforts have attempted to synthesize evidence-based indication to guide clinical practice. Significant progress in trauma-based resuscitation techniques has led to improved outcomes in injured patients and a reduction in the requirement of DCS techniques.

SUMMARY

DCS remains an important treatment strategy in the management of specific patient cohorts. Continued developments in early trauma care will likely result in a further decline in the required use of DCS in severely injured patients.

Damage control surgery: use of diagnostic CT after life-saving laparotomy

Damage control surgery (DCS) is a limited exploratory laparotomy that is performed in unstable trauma patients who, without immediate intervention, would acutely decompensate. Patients usually present with shock physiology and metabolic derangements including acidosis, hypothermia, and coagulopathy. Delayed medical correction of these metabolic derangements leads to an irreversible state of coagulopathic hemorrhagic shock and inevitable patient demise. Therefore, once a patient meets DCS criteria, a limited exploratory laparotomy is performed to stabilize life-threatening injury and expedite initiation of medical resuscitation in the intensive care unit (ICU). The surgeon plans to return to the operating room for definitive surgical treatment once the patient is hemodynamically stabilized and the metabolic derangements have been corrected. DCS patients are frequently sent to the ICU with an open abdomen and purposefully retained surgical equipment. The lack of response to resuscitation efforts, persistent hypotension, tachycardia, and/or the development of sepsis are common indications for this patient population to undergo CT imaging. The indications and findings of multi-detector CT (MDCT) in patients post-DCS have not been thoroughly evaluated in the radiology literature. A radiologist's knowledge of the DCS protocol and pre-imaging surgical interventions helps optimize the MDCT protocol. This enhances the radiologist's ability to evaluate for failure of surgical interventions performed prior to imaging and to search for injuries in areas that were not explored or that were missed during the initial surgical exploration.

Indications for use of damage control surgery and damage control interventions in civilian trauma patients: A scoping review

BACKGROUND

Variation in the use of damage control (DC) surgery across trauma centers may partially be driven by uncertainty as to when the procedure is indicated. We sought to scope the literature on DC surgery and DC interventions, identify their reported indications, and examine the content and evidence upon which they are based.

METHODS

We searched MEDLINE, EMBASE, PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, and the Cochrane Library (1950-February 14, 2014) and the grey literature for original and nonoriginal citations reporting indications for DC surgery or DC interventions in civilian trauma patients.

RESULTS

Among 27,732 citations identified, we included 270 peer-reviewed articles in the scoping review. Of these, 156 (57.8%) represented original research, primarily (75.0%) cohort studies. The articles reported 1,099 indications for DC surgery and 418 indications for 15 different DC interventions. The majority of indications for DC interventions were for abdominal (56.5%) procedures, including therapeutic perihepatic packing (56.5%), temporary abdominal closure/open abdominal management (40.7%), and staged pancreaticoduodenectomy (2.8%). Most DC surgery indications were based on intraoperative findings (71.7%) and represented characteristics of the injured patient (94.5%), including their physiology (57.6%), injuries (38.9%), and/or the amount or type of resuscitation provided (14.3%). Others were dependent on characteristics of the treating surgeon (12.1%), the patient's physiologic response to trauma care (9.6%), and/or the trauma care environment (1.5%). Approximately half (49.5%) included a decision threshold (e.g., pH < X) and, while most (74.7%) were based on a single clinical finding/injury, 25.3% required the presence of multiple findings concurrently. Only 87 indications were evaluated in original research studies and only 9 by more than one study.

CONCLUSION

The vast number, varying underlying content, and lack of original research relating to indications for DC suggests that substantial uncertainty exists around when the procedure is indicated and highlights the need to establish evidence-informed consensus indications.

Primary skin closure after damage control laparotomy

Background

Damage control laparotomy (DCL) is used widely in the management of patients with traumatic injuries but carries significant morbidity. Surgical-site infection (SSI) also carries potential morbidity, increased costs and prolonged hospital stay. The aim of this study was to determine whether primary skin closure after DCL increases the risk of SSI.

Methods

This was a retrospective institutional review of injured patients undergoing DCL between 2004 and 2012. Outcomes of patients who had primary skin closure at the time of fascial closure were compared with those of patients whose skin wound was left open to heal by secondary intention. The association between skin closure and SSI was evaluated using propensity score-adjusted multivariable logistic regression.

Results

Of 510 patients who underwent DCL, primary fascial closure was achieved in 301. Among these, 111 (36·9 per cent) underwent primary skin closure and in 190 (63·1 per cent) the skin wound was left open. Fascial closure at the initial take-back surgery was associated with having skin closure (P &lt; 0·001), and colonic injury was associated with leaving the skin open (P = 0·002). On multivariable analysis, primary skin closure was associated with an increased risk of abdominal SSI (P = 0·020), but not fascial dehiscence (P = 0·446). Of patients receiving skin closure, 85·6 per cent did not develop abdominal SSI and were spared the morbidity of managing an open wound at discharge.

Conclusion

Primary skin closure after DCL is appropriate but may be associated with an increased risk of SSI.

Medical aspects of terrorist bombings - a focus on DCS and DCR

Although terrorist bombings have tormented the world for a long time, currently they have reached unprecedented levels and become a continuous threat without borders, race or age. Almost all of them are caused by improvised explosive devices. The unpredictability of the terrorist bombings, leading to simultaneous generation of a large number of casualties and severe "multidimensional" blast trauma require a constant vigilance and preparedness of every hospital worldwide. Approximately 1-2.6% of all trauma patients and 7% of the combat casualties require a massive blood transfusion. Coagulopathy is presented in 65% of them with mortality exceeding 50%. Damage control resuscitation is a novel approach, developed in the military practice for treatment of this subgroup of trauma patients. The comparison with the conventional approach revealed mortality reduction with 40-74%, lower frequency of abdominal compartment syndrome (8% vs. 16%), sepsis (9% vs. 20%), multiorgan failure (16% vs. 37%) and a significant reduction of resuscitation volumes, both crystalloids and blood products. DCS and DCR are promising new approaches, contributing for the mortality reduction among the most severely wounded patients. Despite the lack of consensus about the optimal ratio of the blood products and the possible influence of the survival bias, we think that DCR carries survival benefit and recommend it in trauma patients with exsanguinating bleeding.

Damage control surgery for abdominal emergencies

BACKGROUND

Damage control surgery is a management sequence initiated to reduce the risk of death in severely injured patients presenting with physiological derangement. Damage control principles have emerged as an approach in non-trauma abdominal emergencies in order to reduce mortality compared with primary definitive surgery.

METHODS

A PubMed/MEDLINE literature review was conducted of data available over the past decade (up to August 2013) to gain information on current understanding of damage control surgery for abdominal surgical emergencies. Future directions for research are discussed.

RESULTS

Damage control surgery facilitates a strategy for life-saving intervention for critically ill patients by abbreviated laparotomy with subsequent reoperation for delayed definitive repair after physiological resuscitation. The six-phase strategy (including damage control resuscitation in phase 0) is similar to that for severely injured patients, although non-trauma indications include shock from uncontrolled haemorrhage or sepsis. Minimal evidence exists to validate the benefit of damage control surgery in general surgical abdominal emergencies. The collective published experience over the past decade is limited to 16 studies including a total of 455 (range 3-99) patients, of which the majority are retrospective case series. However, the concept has widespread acceptance by emergency surgeons, and appears a logical extension from pathophysiological principles in trauma to haemorrhage and sepsis. The benefits of this strategy depend on careful patient selection. Damage control surgery has been performed for a wide range of indications, but most frequently for uncontrolled bleeding during elective surgery, haemorrhage from complicated gastroduodenal ulcer disease, generalized peritonitis, acute mesenteric ischaemia and other sources of intra-abdominal sepsis.

CONCLUSION

Damage control surgery is employed in a wide range of abdominal emergencies and is an increasingly recognized life-saving tactic in emergency surgery performed on physiologically deranged patients.

Gauze packing as damage control for uncontrollable haemorrhage in severe thoracic trauma

Introduction

The usefulness of thoracic damage control (DC) for trauma requiring a thoracotomy is not established. The aim of this study was to clarify the usefulness of thoracic packing as DC surgery.

Methods

This was a retrospective case series study of 12 patients with thoracic trauma suffering uncontrollable intrathoracic haemorrhage and shock who underwent intrathoracic packing. Our thoracic DC technique consisted of ligation and packing over the bleeding point or filling gauze in the bleeding spaces as well as packing for the thoracotomy wound. The success rates of intrathoracic haemostasis, changes in the circulation and the volume of discharge from the thoracic tubes were evaluated.

Results

Packing was undertaken for the thoracic wall in five patients, for the lung in four patients, for the vertebrae in two patients and for the descending thoracic aorta in one patient. Haemostasis was achieved successfully in seven cases. Of these, the volume of discharge from the thoracic tube exceeded 400ml/hr within three hours after packing in three patients, decreased to less than 200ml/hr within seven hours in six patients and decreased to 100ml/hr within eight hours in six patients. Systolic pressure could be maintained over 70mmHg by seven hours after packing.

Conclusions

Intrathoracic packing is useful for some patients, particularly in the space around the vertebrae, at the lung apex, and between the diaphragm and the thoracic wall. After packing, it is advisable to wait for three hours to see whether vital signs can be maintained and then to wait further to see if the discharge from the thoracic tube decreases to less than 200ml/hr within five hours.

Gauze packing as damage control for uncontrollable haemorrhage in severe thoracic trauma

Introduction

The usefulness of thoracic damage control (DC) for trauma requiring a thoracotomy is not established. The aim of this study was to clarify the usefulness of thoracic packing as DC surgery.

Methods

This was a retrospective case series study of 12 patients with thoracic trauma suffering uncontrollable intrathoracic haemorrhage and shock who underwent intrathoracic packing. Our thoracic DC technique consisted of ligation and packing over the bleeding point or filling gauze in the bleeding spaces as well as packing for the thoracotomy wound. The success rates of intrathoracic haemostasis, changes in the circulation and the volume of discharge from the thoracic tubes were evaluated.

Results

Packing was undertaken for the thoracic wall in five patients, for the lung in four patients, for the vertebrae in two patients and for the descending thoracic aorta in one patient. Haemostasis was achieved successfully in seven cases. Of these, the volume of discharge from the thoracic tube exceeded 400ml/hr within three hours after packing in three patients, decreased to less than 200ml/hr within seven hours in six patients and decreased to 100ml/hr within eight hours in six patients. Systolic pressure could be maintained over 70mmHg by seven hours after packing.

Conclusions

Intrathoracic packing is useful for some patients, particularly in the space around the vertebrae, at the lung apex, and between the diaphragm and the thoracic wall. After packing, it is advisable to wait for three hours to see whether vital signs can be maintained and then to wait further to see if the discharge from the thoracic tube decreases to less than 200ml/hr within five hours.

Internal vacuum-assisted closure device in the swine model of severe liver injury

OBJECTIVES

The authors present a novel approach to nonresectional therapy in major hepatic trauma utilizing intraabdominal perihepatic vacuum assisted closure (VAC) therapy in the porcine model of Grade V liver injury.

METHODS

A Grade V injury was created in the right lobe of the liver in a healthy pig. A Pringle maneuver was applied (4.5 minutes total clamp time) and a vacuum assisted closure device was placed over the injured lobe and connected to suction. The device consisted of a perforated plastic bag placed over the liver, followed by a 15 cm by 15cm VAC sponge covered with a nonperforated plastic bag. The abdomen was closed temporarily. Blood loss, cardiopulmonary parameters and bladder pressures were measured over a one-hour period. The device was then removed and the animal was euthanized.

RESULTS

Feasibility of device placement was demonstrated by maintenance of adequate vacuum suction pressures and seal. VAC placement presented no major technical challenges. Successful control of ongoing liver hemorrhage was achieved with the VAC. Total blood loss was 625 ml (20ml/kg). This corresponds to class II hemorrhagic shock in humans and compares favorably to previously reported estimated blood losses with similar grade liver injuries in the swine model. No post-injury cardiopulmonary compromise or elevated abdominal compartment pressures were encountered, while hepatic parenchymal perfusion was maintained.

CONCLUSION

These data demonstrate the feasibility and utility of a perihepatic negative pressure device for the treatment of hemorrhage from severe liver injury in the porcine model.

Refinement in the technique of perihepatic packing: a safe and effective surgical hemostasis and multidisciplinary approach can improve the outcome in severe liver trauma

BACKGROUND

since 2005, we refined the technique of perihepatic packing including complete mobilization of the right lobe and packing around the posterior paracaval surface, lateral right side, and anterior and posteroinferior surfaces.

METHODS

two groups of patients with grade IV/V liver trauma underwent perihepatic packing before and after 2005. The study group included 12 patients treated with the new technique. The control group included 23 patients treated with the old technique.

RESULTS

all 13 patients except one who died within 24 hours were treated with the old technique. The overall survival rate was 75% in the patients treated with the new technique (vs 30.4%, P < .02); the liver-related mortality was 8.3% versus 34.8% (P = not significant). The mean survival time in the intensive care unit was longer in the latest group (39.4 vs 22.3 days, P = not significant). The incidence of rebleeding requiring repacking was 16.7% in the patients who underwent new packing versus 45.5% in the patient who were treated with the old technique (P = not significant). The overall (81.8% vs 100%, P = not significant) and liver-related morbidity rate (18.2% vs 41.7%, P = not significant) and the incidence of abdominal sepsis (9.1% vs 41.7%, P = not significant) decreased.

CONCLUSIONS

our refined technique of perihepatic packing seems to be safe and effective.

Management of liver trauma

BACKGROUND

Blunt and penetrating liver trauma is common and often presents major diagnostic and management problems.

METHODS

A literature review was undertaken to determine the current consensus on investigation and management strategies.

RESULTS

The liver is the most frequently injured organ following abdominal trauma. Immediate assessment with ultrasound has replaced diagnostic peritoneal lavage in the resuscitation room, but computerised tomography remains the gold standard investigation. Nonoperative management is preferred in stable patients but laparotomy is indicated in unstable patients. Damage control techniques such as perihepatic packing, hepatotomy plus direct suture, and resectional debridement are recommended. Major complex surgical procedures such as anatomical resection or atriocaval shunting are now thought to be redundant in the emergency setting. Packing is also recommended for the inexperienced surgeon to allow control and stabilisation prior to transfer to a tertiary centre. Interventional radiological techniques are becoming more widely used, particularly in patients who are being managed nonoperatively or have been stabilised by perihepatic packing.

CONCLUSIONS

Management of liver injuries has evolved significantly throughout the last two decades. In the absence of other abdominal injuries, operative management can usually be avoided. Patients with more complex injuries or subsequent complications should be transferred to a specialist centre to optimise final outcome.

Management of liver trauma

BACKGROUND

Blunt and penetrating liver trauma is common and often presents major diagnostic and management problems.

METHODS

A literature review was undertaken to determine the current consensus on investigation and management strategies.

RESULTS

The liver is the most frequently injured organ following abdominal trauma. Immediate assessment with ultrasound has replaced diagnostic peritoneal lavage in the resuscitation room, but computerised tomography remains the gold standard investigation. Nonoperative management is preferred in stable patients but laparotomy is indicated in unstable patients. Damage control techniques such as perihepatic packing, hepatotomy plus direct suture, and resectional debridement are recommended. Major complex surgical procedures such as anatomical resection or atriocaval shunting are now thought to be redundant in the emergency setting. Packing is also recommended for the inexperienced surgeon to allow control and stabilisation prior to transfer to a tertiary centre. Interventional radiological techniques are becoming more widely used, particularly in patients who are being managed nonoperatively or have been stabilised by perihepatic packing.

CONCLUSIONS

Management of liver injuries has evolved significantly throughout the last two decades. In the absence of other abdominal injuries, operative management can usually be avoided. Patients with more complex injuries or subsequent complications should be transferred to a specialist centre to optimise final outcome.

Hepatic trauma management and outcome; Our experience

BACKGROUND

Injuries to the liver have been reported in 35-45% of patients with significant blunt abdominal trauma. Since the introduction of ultrasonography and computerized tomography in the evaluation of these patients, there has been an increase in number of hepatic injuries diagnosed that previously would not have been apparent.

AIMS AND OBJECTIVES

The purpose of this study was to determine the epidemiology and pattern of isolated liver injury, significant factors related to management and outcome.

MATERIAL AND METHOD

A retrospective study of 50 cases of isolated Hepatic trauma admitted and managed over span of last three years (June 2006-June 2009) at MGM Medical College, Navi Mumbai.

OBSERVATION

Out of 50 Patients of isolated liver injury, 36 (72%) were managed conservatively. 14(28%) Patients with refractory hypotension and hemoperitoneum were operated in emergency. The mortality of 3 (6%) cases was related to massive bleeding from liver parenchyma.

CONCLUSION

The line of management of isolated liver trauma is primarily guided by the haemodynamic status of the patient at the time of presentation in emergency department and findings on ultrasonography [FAST] and computerized tomography. There is significant association of line of management with volume of hemoperitoneum and number of blood transfusion.

Evaluation of a New Hemostatic Agent in a Porcine Grade V Liver Injury Model

Our objective was to evaluate the hemostatic efficacy of a newly modified chitosan in a porcine grade V liver injury model. Fifteen Yorkshire pigs underwent standardized grade V liver injuries with a specially designed liver clamp and were randomized to either modified chitosan (MC) patch treatment or standard gauze packing. Free bleeding was allowed for 30 seconds. Fluid resuscitation was infused as necessary to reestablish a mean arterial pressure (MAP) within at least 80 per cent of the preinjury MAP. Animals were observed for 90 minutes or until death. Endpoints were survival, total blood loss, time to hemostasis, and resuscitation MAP, and resuscitation volume. Total mean blood loss was less in the MC patch group (464 ± 267 mL vs 1234 ± 78 mL, P < 0.001). Time to hemostasis was significantly less (4.8 ± 2.5 minutes in the MC patch group vs 9.6 ± 2.5 minutes, P < 0.01). Fluid resuscitation was less (1098 ± 459 mL in the MC patch group vs 1770 ± 172 mL, P < 0.01). Survival was 100 per cent in the MC patch group and 80 per cent in the gauze packing group. MC patches demonstrate the continued hemostatic agent evolution for improved control of lethal solid organ bleeding.

[Surgical treatment of liver trauma: resection--when and how?]

Liver resection as an emergency procedure in patients with liver injury due to abdominal trauma has become a rare procedure. In most cases liver trauma can be managed conservatively. Currently surgery is only indicated in hemodynamically instable patients and in cases of progredient haematoma where the main aim is control of bleeding. Anatomical liver resection should be avoided and may only be performed in cases of total vascular avulsion. Debridement of devascularized tissue can also be carried out in terms of an atypical liver resection. This article elucidates the current indications for liver resection after traumatic liver injury.

A prospective look at the current state of open abdomens

The present study examines the current management, closure rate, and complications of open abdomens in trauma patients admitted to an Academic Level I trauma center between May 2004 and April 2007. Variables examined include mechanism, injuries, use of antibiotics and paralytics, type of abdominal closure, days to closure, complications, ICU and hospital length of stay, and mortality. Stepwise logistic regression was performed to identify independent predictors of failed abdominal closure. Of 900 laparotomies, 93 (10%) were left open. Eighty-five (91%) patients survived for closure opportunity. Definitive fascial closure was achieved in 72 (85%) at 3.9 +/- 3.7 days (range 1-21 days). Of the remaining 13 patients, seven were closed with biologic material, five by skin grafting, and one had skin-only closure. Entero-atmospheric fistulas occurred in 14 (15%) patients. Two independent risk factors associated with failed abdominal closure were the presence of deep surgical site infection [odds ratio (OR) 17.4; 95% confidence interval (CI) 2.6-115.8, P = 0.003] and intra-abdominal abscess (OR 7.4; 95% CI 1.1-51.0, P = 0.04). In conclusion, open abdomens are commonly necessary after trauma laparotomies. Definitive fascial closure can be achieved in 85 per cent of cases. In conjunction with biologics, closure can be achieved in 93 per cent of cases. Failure to primarily close the abdomen is associated with a significantly higher risk for entero-atmospheric fistula occurrence.

Multidisciplinary approach for the management of complex hepatic injuries AAST-OIS grades IV-V: a prospective study

BACKGROUND

Complex hepatic injuries grades IV-V are highly lethal. The objective of this study is to assess the multidisciplinary approach for their management and to evaluate if survival could be improved with this approach.

STUDY DESIGN

Prospective 54-month study of all patients sustaining hepatic injuries grades IV-V managed operatively at a Level I Trauma Center.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE

survival.

STATISTICAL ANALYSIS

univariate and stepwise logistic regression.

RESULTS

Seventy-five patients sustained penetrating (47/63%) and blunt (28/37%) injuries. Seven (9%) patients underwent emergency department thoracotomy with a mortality of 100%. Out of the 75 patients, 52 (69%) sustained grade IV, and 23 (31%) grade V. The estimated blood loss was 3,539+/-3,040 ml. The overall survival was 69%, adjusted survival excluding patients requiring emergency department thoracotomy was 76%. Survival stratified to injury grade: grade IV 42/52-81%, grade V 10/23-43%. Mortality grade IV versus V injuries (p < 0.002; RR 2.94; 95% CI 1.52-5.70). Risk factors for mortality: packed red blood cells transfused in operating room (p=0.024), estimated blood loss (p < 0.001), dysryhthmia (p < 0.0001), acidosis (p = 0.051), hypothermia (p = 0.04). The benefit of angiography and angioembolization indicated: 12% mortality (2/17) among those that received it versus a 36% mortality (21/58) among those that did not (p = 0.074; RR 0.32; 95% CI 0.08-1.25). Stepwise logistic regression identified as significant independent predictors of outcome: estimated blood loss (p= 0.0017; RR 1.24; 95% CI 1.08-1.41) and number of packed red blood cells transfused in the operating room (p = 0.0358; RR 1.16; 95% CI 1.01-1.34).

CONCLUSIONS

The multidisciplinary approach to the management of these severe grades of injuries appears to improve survival in these highly lethal injuries. A prospective multi-institutional study is needed to validate this approach.

Major hepatic trauma: warm ischemic tolerance of the liver after hemorrhagic shock

BACKGROUND

The management of severe hepatic trauma frequently involves exposing the liver to varying periods of warm ischemia. The ischemic tolerance of the liver, in the setting of hemorrhagic shock (HS) and trauma, is presently unknown. We tested the hypothesis that warm ischemic tolerance of the porcine liver will be decreased following resuscitation from HS.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Twenty-three Yorkshire pigs were divided into three groups: 1) hepatic ischemia alone (HI, n = 9); 2) hemorrhagic shock alone (HS, n = 3); and 3) hemorrhagic shock plus hepatic ischemia combined (HSHI, n = 11). Following reperfusion, a liver biopsy was obtained and serial blood chemistries were sampled.

RESULTS

Post-operative day 7 mortality was increased in the HSHI group (7/11) compared to the HI (0/9) group, P = 0.038. Notably, deaths did not result from acute liver failure, but rather from intra-operative hemodynamic collapse shortly following hepatic reperfusion. In addition, the HSHI group experienced significantly elevated lactic acid, serum creatinine and liver enzyme levels. Analysis of the liver biopsy samples is consistent with a more severe liver injury in the HSHI group.

CONCLUSIONS

The warm ischemic tolerance of the liver following resuscitation from HS is significantly decreased in this porcine model compared to HS or HI alone. Mortality was associated with acute intra-operative hemodynamic collapse occurring shortly after hepatic reperfusion.

Classification of liver and pancreatic trauma

The liver is the most frequently injured intra-abdominal organ and associated injury to other organs increases the risk of complications and death. This has highlighted the critical need for an accurate classification system as a basis for the clinical decision-making process. Several classification systems have been proposed in an attempt to incorporate the aetiology, anatomy and extent of injury and correlate it with subsequent clinical management and outcome. The widely accepted Organ Injury Scale is based on anatomical criteria that quantify the disruption of the liver parenchyma and defines six groups which may influence management strategies and relate to outcome. The less common pancreatic injury remains a major source of morbidity and mortality due to the likelihood of associated solid or hollow-organ injuries. The implication of a delay in diagnosis and management emphasizes the need for an accurate classification system. The Organ Injury Scale is widely used for pancreas trauma and recognizes the importance of progressive parenchymal injury and in particular ductal injury. Advances in imaging techniques have led to the development of newer radiological classification systems; however, validation of their accuracy remains to be proven. An accurate classification of liver and pancreatic trauma is fundamental for the development of treatment protocols in which clinical decisions are based on the severity of injury.

Use of a Refined Operative Strategy in Combination with the Multidisciplinary Approach to Manage Blunt Juxtahepatic Venous Injuries

BACKGROUND

Despite continuous advances in traumatology, juxtahepatic venous injuries are still the most difficult and deadly form of liver trauma. Most deaths result from exsanguination, and reported mortality ranges from 50% to 80%. This is an evaluation on our experience with the management of this high mortality injury following a refined operative strategy.

METHODS

This is a retrospective study of consecutive patients sustaining blunt juxtahepatic venous injuries. The management for these patients was mainly a refined operative strategy combined with a multidisciplinary approach. Preoperative conditions and the patient demographics were gathered. In addition, the number and type of interventional procedures, overall complications, and operative procedures were collected and analyzed.

RESULTS

From January, 1996 to March, 2004, 19 patients (M:F = 13:6) with juxtahepatic venous injuries were included and all were managed operatively. The operative procedures included hepatectomy by finger fracture technique for direct repair (8), perihepatic packing (1), packing and hepatic artery embolization (1), packing and hepatic artery ligation (1), hepatorrhaphy and packing (5), packing followed by hepatectomy (2) and atriocaval shunt for direct repair (1). The survival rate for the packing group was higher than that of the direct repair group (75% versus 45%), but was not statistically significant (p = 0.352). Injury to the retrohepatic vena cava influenced the patient's survival significantly (p = 0.041). The overall survival was 58% (11/19).

CONCLUSION

A well-defined operative strategy helps surgeons deal with the problem of blunt juxtahepatic venous injury, and its combination with multidisciplinary management will improve patient outcomes.

[Surgical management, prognostic factors, and outcome in hepatic trauma]

Hepatic trauma is a rare surgical emergency with significant morbidity and mortality. Extensive experience in liver surgery is a prerequisite for the management of these injuries. The medical records of 68 consecutive patients with hepatic trauma were retrospectively reviewed for the severity of liver injury, management, morbidity, mortality, and risk factors. Of the patients, 14 were treated conservatively and 52 surgically (24 suture/fibrin glue, 16 perihepatic packing, 11 resections, 1 liver transplantation). Two patients died just before emergency surgery could be performed. Overall mortality was 21% (14/68), and 13, 14, 6, 27, and 50% for types I, II, III, IV, and V injuries, respectively. Only nine deaths (all type IV and V) were liver related, while four were caused by extrahepatic injuries and one by concomitant liver cirrhosis. With respect to treatment, conservative management, suture, and resection had a low mortality of 0, 4, and 9%, respectively. In contrast, mortality was 47% in patients in whom only packing was performed (in severe injuries). Stepwise multivariate regression analysis proved prothrombin values <40%, ISS scores >30, and transfusion requirements of more than 10 red packed cells to be significant risk factors for post-traumatic death. Type I-III hepatic injuries can safely be treated by conservative or simple surgical means. However, complex hepatic injuries (types IV and V) carry a significant mortality and may require hepatic surgery, including liver resection or even transplantation. Therefore, patients with severe hepatic injuries should be treated in a specialized institution.

War liver injuries

AIM

To provide a retrospective analysis of our results and experience in primary surgical treatment of subjects with war liver injuries.

METHODS

From July 1991 to December 1999, 204 subjects with war liver injuries were treated. A total of 82.8% of the injured were with the liver injuries combined with the injuries of other organs. In 93.7%, the injuries were caused by fragments of explosive devices or bullets of various calibers. In 140 (68.6%) of the injured there were minor lesions (grade I to II), treated with simple repair or drainage. There were complex injuries of the liver (grade III-V) in 64 (31.4%) of the injured Those injuries required complex repair (hepatorrhaphy, hepatotomy, resection debridement, resection, packing alone). The technique ofperihepatic packing and planned reoperation had a crucial and life-saving role when severe bleeding was present. Routine peritoneal drainage was applied in all of the injured. Primary management of 74.0% of the injured was performed in war hospitals.

RESULTS

After primary treatment, 72 (35.3%) of the injured were with postoperative complications. Reoperation was done in 66 injured. Total mortality rate in 204 injured was 18.1%. All the deceased had significant combined injuries. Mortality rates due to the liver injury of the grade III, IV and V were 16.6%, 70.0% and 83.3%, respectively.

CONCLUSION

Complex liver injuries caused very high mortality rate and the management of the injured was delicate under war circumstances (if the injured reached the hospital alive). Our experience under war circumstances and with war surgeons of limited knowledge of the liver surgery and war surgery, confirmed that it was necessary to apply compressive abdominal packing alone or in combination with other techniques for hemostasis in the treatment of liver injuries grade III-V, resuscitation and rapid transportation to specialized hospitals.

Damage control in the abdomen and beyond

Background

Damage control is not a modern concept, but the application of this approach represents a new paradigm in surgery, borne out of a need to care for patients sustaining multiple high-energy injuries.

Methods

A Medline search was performed to locate English language articles relating to damage control procedures in trauma patients. The retrieved articles were manually cross-referenced, and additional academic and historical articles were identified.

Results and conclusion

Damage control surgery, sometimes known as ‘damage limitation surgery’ or ‘abbreviated laparotomy’, is best defined as creating a stable anatomical environment to prevent the patient from progressing to an unsalvageable metabolic state. Patients are more likely to die from metabolic failure than from failure to complete organ repairs. It is with this awareness that damage control surgery is performed, enabling the patient to maintain a sustainable physiological envelope.

Operative management and outcomes in 103 AAST-OIS grades IV and V complex hepatic injuries: trauma surgeons still need to operate, but angioembolization helps

BACKGROUND

American Association for the Surgery of Trauma (AAST) Organ Injury Scale (OIS) grades IV and V complex hepatic injuries are highly lethal. Our objectives were to review experience and identify predictors of outcome and to evaluate the role of angioembolization in decreasing mortality.

METHODS

This was a retrospective 8-year study of all patients sustaining AAST-OIS grades IV and V hepatic injuries managed operatively. Statistical analysis was performed using univariate and multivariate logistic regression. The main outcome measure was survival.

RESULTS

The study included 103 patients, with a mean Revised Trauma Score of 5.61 +/- 2.55 and a mean Injury Severity Score of 33 +/- 9.5. Mechanism of injury was penetrating in 80 (79%) and blunt in 23 (21%). Emergency department thoracotomy was performed in 21 (25%). AAST grade IV injuries occurred in 51 (47%) and grade V injuries occurred in 52 (53%). Mean estimated blood loss was 9,414 mL. Overall survival was 43%. Adjusted overall survival rate after emergency department thoracotomy patients were excluded was 58%. Results stratified to AAST-OIS injury grade were as follows: grade IV, 32 of 51 (63%); grade V, 12 of 52 (23%); grade IV versus grade V (p < 0.001) odds ratio, 2.06; 95% confidence interval, 2.72 (1.40-3.04). Logistic regression analysis identified as independent predictors of outcome Revised Trauma Score (adjusted p < 0.0002), angioembolization (adjusted p < 0.0177), direct approach to hepatic veins (adjusted p < 0.0096), and packing (adjusted p < 0.0013).

CONCLUSION

Improvements in mortality can be achieved with an appropriate operative approach. Angioembolization as an adjunct procedure decreases mortality in AAST-OIS grades IV and V hepatic injuries.

[Damage control: a tactical alternative for the management of exanguinating trauma patients]

BACKGROUND

Despite the advances in the treatment of exanguinating patients, hemorrhage remains as the leading cause of early deaths. A great deal of attention has been given to "damage control" as a therapeutic alternative in this scenario.

AIM

To appraise the definition, indications, operative techniques and results of damage control for the treatment of exanguinating trauma patients.

METHOD

Bibliographic review.

RESULTS

Damage control introduces the concept of breaking the vicious cycle of metabolic acidosis, hypothermia and coagulopathy which results from hemorrhagic shock. Thus, the operation has to be interrupted before this irreversible stage, even if the injured organs were not given the definitive treatment at this moment. So, damage control involves three steps: an abbreviated operation, a recovering period in the intensive care unit, and the reoperation for the definitive treatment. At the abbreviated operation, operative techniques as stapling intestinal injuries or packing liver wounds are applied, allowing rapid control of the bleeding and spillage. In the intensive care unit, the patient is warmed, oxygen delivery and consumption are restored and coagulation factors administered. As soon as the hemodynamic stability, ideal body temperature and coagulation status are reached, the definitive operation is carried out. Damage control is a helpful option if correctly used. However, there are also severe complications that can occur. Therefore, it should be employed only in centers that could provide optimum resources.

CONCLUSION

Damage control is an important tactical alternative for the treatment of exanguinating trauma patients.

A multidisciplinary approach in the management of hepatic injuries

We reviewed 87 patients with hepatic injuries who were admitted to King Chulalongkorn Memorial Hospital, Bangkok, Thailand, from January 1995 to December 1999; 76% of them had sustained blunt trauma and 24% penetrating trauma. Their injury severity scores (ISS) ranged from 4 to 57 (mean 20.94+/-12.8); 50% of them were in shock on arrival; 8.1, 28.7, 25.3, 19.5, and 18.4% suffered from hepatic injuries graded I, II, III, IV, and V, respectively. Seventeen patients (19.5%) were successfully managed non-operatively; three of them underwent hepatic angiography, which in two revealed leakage of contrast medium from the right hepatic artery; both were successfully treated by embolization. One patient had bile leakage and collection, which was successfully treated by ultrasound-guided percutaneous drainage. Seventy patients (80.5%) underwent exploratory laparotomy; nine of them died in the operating room. Of the remaining 61 who left the operating room alive, 21 had perihepatic packing, which was frequently used in those with injuries to segments V, VI, VII, and VIII (Couinaud's nomenclature). Eight patients who had packing and one who had not died in the postoperative period. Two patients who had packing underwent subsequent hepatic angiography with embolization before successful pack removal. The overall mortality was 20.7%. The mortality in complex hepatic injuries (grades IV and V) was 13 out of 33 (39.4%). We believe that non-operative management should be considered in haemodynamically stable patients. Angiography with embolization is invaluable in improving outcome in both non-operative and operative patients. Perihepatic packing is life-saving in complex hepatic injuries that cannot be effectively treated by simple surgical procedures. Finally, ultrasound- or CT-guided percutaneous drainage of bile leakage or collections spared a number of patients from open and complicated surgery.

Anatomic resection for severe blunt liver trauma in 100 patients: significant differences between young and elderly

The liver is the organ most commonly injured during blunt abdominal trauma. As our society ages, emergency surgery for active elderly patients increases, but data on aggressive emergency hepatic resection remain scarce in the literature. The purpose of this study was to determine whether the elderly (70 years of age or older) can tolerate major liver injury and subsequent hepatic resection. We investigated 100 patients who were treated by an anatomic resection for severe blunt liver trauma (29 elderly patients who were 70 years of age or older and 71 young patients who were younger than 70 years of age) in a retrospective study. The elderly patients were more severely injured as demonstrated by a higher Injury Severity Score, a lower Glascow Coma Scale, and lower survival (80.3% vs. 65.5%; p < 0.05). The total number of associated injuries was greater in elderly patients. Motor vehicle accidents were responsible for 71.8% of the injuries in the young group, and the predominant mechanism in the elderly patients was also motor vehicle accidents (51.7%). The 71 anatomic hepatic resections performed on the young patients included right hemihepatectomy (n = 45), left lateral segment resection (n = 14), bisegmentectomy (n = 5), and others. The 29 anatomic hepatic resections performed for the elderly patients were right hemihepatectomy (n = 15), left lateral segment resection (n = 5), left hemihepatectomy (n = 4), and others. Pneumonia, subphrenic abscess, and urosepsis occurred at a significantly higher frequency in elderly patients than in young patients. Our data clearly indicated that (1) the mechanism of injury, grade of associated intraabdominal injuries, distribution of surgical procedures, and complications differ significantly between young and elderly patients; and (2) the survival rate (65.5%) in elderly patients may be sufficient to consider anatomic hepatic resection to be a useful, safe procedure.

Sutureless liver repair and hemorrhage control using laser-mediated fusion of human albumin as a solder

BACKGROUND

Major liver trauma has a high mortality because of immediate exsanguination and a delayed morbidity from septicemia, peritonitis, biliary fistulae, and delayed secondary hemorrhage. We evaluated laser soldering using liquid albumin for welding liver injuries.

METHODS

Fourteen lacerations (6 x 2 cm) and 13 nonanatomic resection injuries (raw surface, 8 x 2 cm) were repaired. An 805-nm laser was used to weld 53% liquid albumin-indocyanine green solder to the liver surface, reinforcing it by welding a free autologous omental scaffold. The animals were heparinized and hepatic inflow occlusion was used for vascular control. For both laceration and resection injuries, 16 soldering repairs were evaluated acutely at 3 hours. Eleven animals were evaluated chronically, two at 2 weeks and nine at 4 weeks.

RESULTS

All 27 laser mediated-liver repairs had minimal blood loss compared with the suture controls. No dehiscence, hemorrhage, or bile leakage was seen in any of the laser repairs after 3 hours. All 11 chronic repairs healed without complication.

CONCLUSION

This modality effectively seals the liver surface, joins lacerations with minimal thermal injury, and works independently of the patient's coagulation status.

Liver repair and hemorrhage control by using laser soldering of liquid albumin in a porcine model

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE

We evaluated laser soldering by using liquid albumin for welding liver injuries. Major liver trauma has a high mortality because of immediate exsanguination and a delayed morbidity from septicemia, peritonitis, biliary fistulae, and delayed secondary hemorrhage.

STUDY DESIGN/MATERIALS AND METHODS

Eight laceration (6 x 2 cm) and eight nonanatomic resection injuries (raw surface, 6 x 2 cm) were repaired. An 805-nm laser was used to weld 50% liquid albumin-indocyanine green solder to the liver surface, reinforcing it with a free autologous omental scaffold. The animals were heparinized and hepatic inflow occlusion was used for vascular control. All 16 soldering repairs were evaluated at 3 hours.

RESULTS

All 16 laser mediated liver repairs had minimal blood loss as compared with the suture controls. No dehiscence, hemorrhage, or bile leakage was seen in any of the laser repairs after 3 hours.

CONCLUSION

Laser fusion repair of the liver is a reliable technique to gain hemostasis on the raw surface as well as weld lacerations.