Ligation: an alternative for control of exsanguination in major vascular injuries

Damage control in the injured patient

The damage control concept is an essential component in the management of severely injured patients. The principles in sequence are as follows: (1) abbreviated surgical procedures limited to haemorrhage and contamination control; (2) correction of physiological derangements; (3) definitive surgical procedures. Although originally described in the management of major abdominal injuries, the concept has been extended to include thoracic, vascular, orthopedic, and neurosurgical procedures, as well as anesthesia and resuscitative strategies.

Damage control surgery in the abdomen: An approach for the management of severe injured patients

Damage control is well established as a potentially life-saving procedure in a few selected critically injured patients. In these patients the 'lethal triad' of hypothermia, acidosis, and coagulopathy is presented as a vicious cycle that often can not be interrupted and which marks the limit of the patient's ability to cope with the physiological consequences of injury. The principles of damage control have led to improved survival and to stopped bleeding until the physiologic derangement has been restored and the patient could undergo a prolong operation for definitive repair. Although morbidity is remaining high, it is acceptable if it comes in exchange for improved survival. There are five critical decision-making stages of damage control: I, patient selection and decision to perform damage control; II, operation and intraoperative reassessment of laparotomy; III, resuscitation in the intensive care unit; IV, definitive procedures after returning to the operating room; and V, abdominal wall reconstruction. The purpose of this article is to review the physiology of the components of the 'lethal triad', the indication and principles of abdominal damage control of trauma patients, the reoperation time, and the pathophysiology of abdominal compartment syndrome.

Small intestinal submucosa for vascular reconstruction in the presence of gastrointestinal contamination

INTRODUCTION

Surgical options for vascular reconstruction in a contaminated field are limited and include prosthetic reconstruction or ligation with extra-anatomic bypass. With prosthetic insertion, rates of graft infection and failures (pseudoaneurysms and thrombosis) are high. In the emergent situations, extra-anatomic bypass is time-consuming and complex, and it produces marginal long-term results. Small intestinal submucosa (SIS) is a cell-free collagen matrix derived from porcine small intestine. Preliminary studies have demonstrated its ability to be remodeled into host tissue. In this study, we compared SIS to polytetrafluoroethylene (PTFE) as a vascular patch for arterial repair in the presence of massive gastrointestinal contamination to evaluate graft patency, incorporation, infection, and aneurysm formation.

METHODS

Adult mongrel pigs underwent general anesthesia with Isoflurane and were then randomized to 1 of 3 groups: control, contamination (colon puncture with stool contamination of the pelvis), or shock + contamination (40% blood volume for 1 hour, then resuscitation with shed blood and crystalloid, plus contamination). All groups then underwent a left common iliac arteriotomy and further randomized to a 1 x 3-cm patch angioplasty with either SIS or PTFE. All received cefotetan for 24 hours. All animals were sacrificed between 2 and 4 weeks, and necropsy was performed. Grafts were cultured, and microscopic analysis with hematoxylin and eosin and trichrome was performed. Outcomes included pulse quality (normal or diminished) compared with opposite side, graft infection, and pseudoaneurysm; all were determined by a blinded investigator.

RESULTS

Forty animals were randomized, and 1 died of abdominal sepsis. All control animals had normal distal pulses, no pseudoaneurysms, and no patch infections. The pseudoaneurysm rate for the contaminated PTFE patches was 25% compared with 0% in the SIS group (P = 0.09). Patch infection occurred in 73% of all PTFE patches compared with 8% of SIS patches (P < 0.03). Organisms present in the infected grafts included Escherichia coli, Bacteroides species, and other Gram-negative enterics. Histopathology demonstrated the presence of neointima in both SIS and PTFE. Only SIS was completely incorporated, with infiltration of collagen fibrils and lymphocytes.

CONCLUSIONS

SIS was associated with improved graft patency, less infection, complete incorporation, and no false aneurysm formation when compared with PTFE. This may be due to its ability to provide a durable scaffold for cellularization and tissue remodeling. This material may offer a superior alternative to more complex vascular reconstruction techniques in contaminated fields.

Emergency treatment of symptomatic or ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysms: the role of endovascular repair

PURPOSE

To report the initial experience with endovascular aortic repair (EVAR) in patients with ruptured or symptomatic abdominal aortic aneurysms (AAA) and to compare the results with conventional open surgery.

METHODS

Between May 1999 and December 2001, 24 patients (21 men; mean age 75 years, range 56-89) with ruptured or symptomatic AAA underwent EVAR using a specially designed aortomonoiliac endograft. Six patients were selected based on device and operator availability; the subsequent 18 patients were treated under a modified management protocol that offered stent-graft repair to all symptomatic AAA patients. The results of this new treatment protocol were analyzed on an intention-to-treat basis for the last 8 months of the study. The 30-day outcomes in all patients treated with emergency EVAR were compared with 40 consecutive, contemporaneous patients undergoing open surgery for symptomatic or ruptured AAA.

RESULTS

No early conversions to open surgery were performed. Significantly decreased operative blood loss and intensive care stay (p<0.05 for both) were observed in EVAR patients. The mortality rate for EVAR patients was 17% compared to 32% in conventionally treated patients (NS). Among patients with ruptured AAA, the 30-day mortality rates were 24% (4/17) and 41% (12/29) for EVAR and open surgery, respectively (NS). Of 26 unselected patients who were treated prospectively under the modified protocol, the majority (81%, 21/26) had anatomy suitable for endovascular repair; however, only 18 (69%) underwent EVAR owing to a short infrarenal neck (n=2) or device/operator unavailability (n=6).

CONCLUSIONS

EVAR is a feasible treatment in the majority of patients with ruptured or symptomatic AAA. The 30-day mortality appears to be similar between conventionally treated patients and those undergoing endovascular repair.

Evolution in damage control for exsanguinating penetrating abdominal injury

OBJECTIVE

Damage control (DC) has proven valuable in exsanguinated patients. The purpose of this study was to quantify and qualify the impact of current damage control principles applied in a penetrating abdominal injury (PAI) population.

METHODS

Over a 3-year period (June 1997-May 2000), of 271 laparotomies for PAI, 24 patients underwent DC (8.9%). Demographics, injury grade, resuscitative and operative parameters, acid-base status, coagulation profiles, fluid/transfusion requirements, definitive repairs, abdominal closure, complications, and outcomes were reviewed. Data were compared with our DC experience a decade earlier. Fisher's exact test was used for comparisons.

RESULTS

Overall survival improved for equivalent Injury Severity Score, Revised Trauma Score, TRISS, admission systolic blood pressure, operating room systolic blood pressure, and Penetrating Abdominal Trauma Index score. Solids (1.2 vs. 1.3), hollow organ (1.5 vs. 1.7), and major vascular injuries (0.5 vs. 0.8) per patient remain unchanged. Currently, there was less hypothermia with equivalent operating room times. In intensive care unit survivors, acid-base status was similar but coagulopathy and hypothermia were less severe. Definitive colon management has shifted from ostomies to anastomoses. Eventual fascial closure occurred in 14 of 19 (74%) compared with 12 of 14 (86%) in the historical group. There were three gastrointestinal fistulae (one pancreatic), one anastomotic leak, and three intra-abdominal abscesses.

CONCLUSION

Continued application of DC principles has led to improved survival with PAI. Better control of temperature, experience with the open abdomen, and intensive care unit care may be causative.

Damage control in trauma surgery

The technique or approach of damage control surgery in trauma is not new; packing liver injuries has been an accepted treatment strategy for some time. What is new is the realization that an abbreviated laparotomy, or completion of only the essential portions of the operation, is often the best treatment for the patient as a whole. Recent developments include strategies in the operating room and the intensive care unit to manage patients undergoing trauma laparatomy, including prevention of hypothermia, methods to accurately assess resuscitation status with right ventricular catheters and measurements of end-organ perfusion, and recognition of abdominal compartment syndrome, with emphasis on prevention.

Alternatives in the management of penetrating injuries to the iliac vessels

BACKGROUND

The high mortality and morbidity rates after iliac vessel injuries remain a challenging problem for trauma surgeons. Several controversial issues surround the management of iliac vessel injuries, including the value of abbreviated laparotomy, the role of extra-anatomic bypass reconstruction (EABR), the use of vascular prostheses in the presence of contamination, and the need and timing for fasciotomy.

METHODS

Retrospective review of the records of patients who sustained an injury to the iliac vessel between 1987 and 1996.

RESULTS

A total of 64 patients were treated, including 23 with isolated iliac vein injuries, 17 with arterial injuries, and 24 with combined arteriovenous injuries. Vascular prostheses were placed in 17 patients with arterial injuries, including 12 with associated intestinal wounds. Graft infection did not occur. Of the 24 patients with combined injuries, 11 underwent abbreviated laparotomy and 1 died. Five deaths, however, occurred in 13 patients in whom no attempts were made for damage control laparotomy. Significant differences between survivors and nonsurvivors included final arterial pH, final prothrombin time, length of hypotension, and number of transfusions. Arterial ligation with EABR was performed in five patients and failed in two. Deep venous thrombosis and pulmonary embolism occurred in four patients, in three of them after venous injuries were ligated. The overall mortality rate was 23%.

CONCLUSION

Our findings show that (1) abbreviated laparotomy reduces mortality in iliac injuries; (2) EABR should be performed early after stabilization to prevent limb ischemia; (3) the use of vascular prostheses with associated intestinal injuries did not appear to increase the incidence of graft infection; and (4) after vein ligation, early fasciotomy and prophylaxis against extremity swelling, deep venous thrombosis, and pulmonary embolism should be considered.