Predicting the need for thoracoscopic evacuation of residual traumatic hemothorax: chest radiograph is insufficient

[Occult and Retained Haemothorax - Recommendations of the Interdisciplinary Thoracic Trauma Task Group of the German Trauma Society (DGU - Section NIS) and the German Society for Thoracic Surgery (DGT)]

The management of occult and retained haemothorax is challenging for all involved in the care of polytrauma patients in terms of diagnosis and treatment. The focus of decision making is preventing sequelae such as pleural empyema and avoiding a trapped lung. An interdisciplinary task force of the German Society for Thoracic Surgery (DGT) and the German Trauma Society (DGU) on thoracic trauma offers recommendations for post-trauma care of patients with occult and/or retained haemothorax, as based on a comprehensive literature review.

Management of complex pleural disease in the critically ill patient

Disorders of the pleural space are quite common in the critically ill patient. They are generally associated with the underlying illness. It is sometimes difficult to assess for pleural space disorders in the ICU given the instability of some patients. Although the portable chest X-ray remains the primary modality of diagnosis for pleural disorders in the ICU. It can be nonspecific and may miss subtle findings. Ultrasound has become a useful tool to the bedside clinician to aid in diagnosis and management of pleural disease. The majority of pleural space disorders resolve as the patient’s illness improves. There remain a few pleural processes that need specific therapies. While uncomplicated parapneumonic effusions do not have their own treatments. Those that progress to become a complex infected pleural space can have its individual complexity in therapy. Chest tube drainage remains the cornerstone in therapy. The use of intrapleural fibrinolytics has decreased the need for surgical referral. A large hemothorax or pneumothorax in patients admitted to the ICU represent medical emergencies and require emergent action. In this review we focus on the management of commonly encountered complex pleural space disorders in critically ill patients such as complicated pleural space infections, hemothoraces and pneumothoraces.

Timing to perform VATS for traumatic-retained hemothorax (a systematic review and meta-analysis)

PURPOSE

In this systematic review, we analyzed the optimal time range to evacuate traumatic-retained hemothorax using video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery (VATS).

METHODS

We searched PubMed, EMBASE, the Cochrane Register of Controlled Trials, Google Scholar, and the U.S. National Library of Medicine clinical trials database up to February 2019. Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and observational studies with relevant data were included. Data were extracted from studies that reported the success, mortality, or length of hospital stay (LOS) after using VATS during at least two out of three of our time-ranges of interest: days 1-3 (group A), days 4-6 (group B), and day 7 or later (group C).

RESULTS

Six cohort studies with 476 total participants were included in the meta-analysis. The patients in group A had a significantly higher success rate than those in group C (RR = 0.42; 95% CI = 0.21-0.84, p = 0.01). The total LOS for patients whose retained hemothorax was evacuated in group A was 4.7 days shorter than that for those in group B (95% CI =  - 5.6 to  - 3.8, p = 0.006). Likewise, group B patients were discharged 18.1 days earlier than group C patients (95% CI =  - 22.3 to  - 14, p < 0.001). Short-term mortality was not decreased by early VATS.

CONCLUSIONS

Our results indicate that VATS should be considered within the first three days of admission if this intervention is the clinician's choice to evacuate a traumatic-retained hemothorax. Protocol registration number in PROSPERO: CRD42017046856.

Use of an evidence-based algorithm for patients with traumatic hemothorax reduces need for additional interventions

BACKGROUND

Concerted management of the traumatic hemothorax is ill-defined. Surgical management of specific hemothoraces may be beneficial. A comprehensive strategy to delineate appropriate patients for additional procedures does not exist. We developed an evidence-based algorithm for hemothorax management. We hypothesize that the use of this algorithm will decrease additional interventions.

METHODS

A pre-/post-study was performed on all patients admitted to our trauma service with traumatic hemothorax from August 2010 to September 2013. An evidence-based management algorithm was initiated for the management of retained hemothoraces. Patients with length of stay (LOS) less than 24 hours or admitted during an implementation phase were excluded. Study data included age, Injury Severity Score, Abbreviated Injury Scale chest, mechanism of injury, ventilator days, intensive care unit (ICU) LOS, total hospital LOS, and interventions required. Our primary outcome was number of patients requiring more than 1 intervention. Secondary outcomes were empyema rate, number of patients requiring specific additional interventions, 28-day ventilator-free days, 28-day ICU-free days, hospital LOS, all-cause 6-month readmission rate. Standard statistical analysis was performed for all data.

RESULTS

Six hundred forty-two patients (326 pre and 316 post) met the study criteria. There were no demographic differences in either group. The number of patients requiring more than 1 intervention was significantly reduced (49 pre vs. 28 post, p = 0.02). Number of patients requiring VATS decreased (27 pre vs. 10 post, p < 0.01). Number of catheters placed by interventional radiology increased (2 pre vs. 10 post, p = 0.02). Intrapleural thrombolytic use, open thoracotomy, empyema, and 6-month readmission rates were unchanged. The "post" group more ventilator-free days (median, 23.9 vs. 22.5, p = 0.04), but ICU and hospital LOS were unchanged.

CONCLUSION

Using an evidence-based hemothorax algorithm reduced the number of patients requiring additional interventions without increasing complication rates. Defined criteria for surgical intervention allows for more appropriate utilization of resources.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Therapeutic study, level IV.

Suction evacuation of hemothorax: A prospective study

BACKGROUND

Although tube thoracostomy is a common procedure after thoracic trauma, incomplete evacuation of fluid places the patient at risk for retained hemothorax. As little as 300 to 500 cm of blood may result in the need for an additional thoracostomy tube or, in more severe cases, lung entrapment and empyema. We hypothesized that suction evacuation of the thoracic cavity before tube placement would decrease the incidence of late complications.

METHODS

Patients requiring tube thoracostomy within 96 hours of admission were prospectively identified and underwent suction evacuation of the pleural space (SEPS) before tube placement. These patients were compared to historical controls without suction evacuation. Demographics, admission vital signs, laboratory values, details of chest tube placement, and outcomes were collected on all patients. Multivariable logistic regression was used to compare outcomes between groups.

RESULTS

A total of 199 patients were identified, consisting of 100 retrospective controls and 99 SEPS patients. There were no differences in age, sex, admission injury severity score or chest abbreviated injury score, admission laboratory values or vital signs, or hospital length of stay. Mean (SD) volume of hemothorax in SEPS patients was 220 (297) cm; with only 48% having a volume greater than 100 cm at the time of tube placement. Three patients developed empyema, and 19 demonstrated retained blood; there was no difference between SEPS and control patients. Suction evacuation of the pleural space was significantly protective against recurrent pneumothorax after chest tube removal (odds ratio, 0.332; 95% confidence interval, 0.148-0.745).

CONCLUSION

Preemptive suction evacuation of the thoracic cavity did not have a significant impact on subsequent development of retained hemothorax or empyema. Suction evacuation of the pleural space significantly decreased incidence of recurrent pneumothorax after thoracostomy removal. Although the mechanism is unclear, such a benefit may make this simple procedure worthwhile. A larger sample size is required for validation and to determine if preemptive thoracic evacuation has a clinical benefit.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Therapeutic/care management study, level IV.

Trends in nonoperative management of traumatic injuries - A synopsis

Nonoperative management of both blunt and penetrating injuries can be challenging. During the past three decades, there has been a major shift from operative to increasingly nonoperative management of traumatic injuries. Greater reliance on nonoperative, or "conservative" management of abdominal solid organ injuries is facilitated by the various sophisticated and highly accurate noninvasive imaging modalities at the trauma surgeon's disposal. This review discusses selected topics in nonoperative management of both blunt and penetrating trauma. Potential complications and pitfalls of nonoperative management are discussed. Adjunctive interventional therapies used in treatment of nonoperative management-related complications are also discussed.

REPUBLISHED WITH PERMISSION FROM

Stawicki SPA. Trends in nonoperative management of traumatic injuries - A synopsis. OPUS 12 Scientist 2007;1(1):19-35.

VATS versus intrapleural streptokinase: A prospective, randomized, controlled clinical trial for optimum treatment of post-traumatic Residual Hemothorax

BACKGROUND

Post-traumatic residual haemothorax (RH) is common and carries significant morbidity. However, its optimal treatment is not clear.

AIM

The aim of this study was to find the extent of this problem and the choice of treatment between VATS and intra-pleural streptokinase instillation (IPSI).

MATERIAL AND METHODS

This RCT, conducted over 18 months period, included all patients of chest trauma between 18 and 70 years of age, admitted with haemothorax or haemopneumothorax requiring inter-costal drain (ICD) insertion. 154 events of haemothorax/haemopneumothorax requiring ICD insertion were enrolled. RH was seen in 48 (31%) patients: 13 patients were excluded from RCT after refusal for treatment. Seventeen (49%) patients of remaining 35 RH cases were randomized to IPSI group and 18 (51%) patients were randomized to VATS group. The outcome parameters were resolution of RH and treatment related complications.

RESULTS

RH resolved equally well in VATS and IPSI group [13 patients (72%) versus 12 patients (71%), respectively; continuity-adjusted p=1]. Morbidity wise no difference (p-value 0.529) was seen in the two groups.

CONCLUSION

Post-traumatic RH is seen in 1/3rd patients and is equally well treated by VATS and IPSI.

Video-assisted thoracoscopy as an important tool for trauma surgeons: a systematic review

PURPOSE

Trauma patients frequently have serious chest injuries. Retained hemothoraces and persistent pneumothoraces are among the most frequent complications of chest injuries which may lead to major, long-term morbidity and mortality if these complications are not recognized and treated appropriately. Video-assisted thoracoscopy (VATS) is a well-established technique in surgical practice. The usefulness of VATS for treatment of complications after chest trauma has been demonstrated by several authors. However, there is an ongoing debate about the optimal timing of VATS.

METHODS

A computerized search was conducted which yielded 450 studies reporting on the use of VATS for thoracic trauma. Eighteen of these studies were deemed relevant for this review. The quality of these studies was assessed using a check-list and the PRISMA guidelines. Outcome parameters were successful evacuation of the retained hemothorax or treatment of other complications as well as reduction of empyema rate, length of hospital stay, and hospital costs.

RESULTS

There was only one randomized trial and two prospective studies. Most studies report case series of institutional experiences. VATS was found to be very successful in evacuation of retained hemothoraces and seems to reduce the empyema rate subsequently. Furthermore, the length of hospital stay and costs can be drastically reduced with the early use of VATS.

CONCLUSION

Early VATS is an effective treatment for retained hemothoraces or other complications of chest trauma. We propose a clinical pathway, in which VATS is used as an early intervention in order to prevent serious complications such as empyemas or trapped lung.

Management of post-traumatic retained hemothorax: a prospective, observational, multicenter AAST study

BACKGROUND

The natural history and optimal management of retained hemothorax (RH) after chest tube placement is unknown. The intent of our study was to determine practice patterns used and identify independent predictors of the need for thoracotomy.

METHODS

An American Association for the Surgery of Trauma multicenter prospective observational trial was conducted, enrolling patients with placement of chest tube within 24 hours of trauma admission and RH on subsequent computed tomography of the chest. Demographics, interventions, and outcomes were analyzed. Logistic regression analysis was used to identify the independent predictors of successful intervention for each of the management choices chosen and complications.

RESULTS

RH was identified in 328 patients from 20 centers. Video-assisted thoracoscopy (VATS) was the most commonly used initial procedure in 33.5%, but 26.5% required two and 5.4% required three procedures to clear RH or subsequent empyema. Thoracotomy was ultimately required in 20.4%. The strongest independent predictor of successful observation was estimated volume of RH ≤300 cc (odds ratio [OR], 3.7 [2.0-7.0]; p < 0.001). Independent predictors of successful VATS as definitive treatment were absence of an associated diaphragm injury (OR, 4.7 [1.6-13.7]; p = 0.005), use of periprocedural antibiotics for thoracostomy placement (OR, 3.3 [1.2-9.0]; p = 0.023), and volume of RH ≤900 cc (OR, 3.9 [1.4-13.2]; p = 0.03). No relationship between timing of VATS and success rate was identified. Independent predictors of the need for thoracotomy included diaphragm injury (OR, 4.9 [2.4-9.9]; p < 0.001), RH >900 cc (OR, 3.2 [1.4-7.5]; p = 0.007), and failure to give periprocedural antibiotics for initial chest tube placement (OR 2.3 [1.2-4.6]; p = 0.015). The overall empyema and pneumonia rates for RH patients were 26.8% and 19.5%, respectively.

CONCLUSION

RH in trauma is associated with high rates of empyema and pneumonia. VATS can be performed with high success rates, although optimal timing is unknown. Approximately, 25% of patients require at least two procedures to effectively clear RH or subsequent pleural space infections and 20.4% require thoracotomy.

Role of Early Thoracoscopy for Management of Penetrating Wounds of the Chest

Most nonlife-threatening penetrating wounds of the chest (PWC) are treated with a chest tube alone. This may be inadequate because missed injuries, retained hemothorax, or foreign material may be difficult to address later. Early thoracoscopy should improve outcome. We conducted a retrospective review of 88 stable patients with PWC initially treated with a chest tube and had retained a hemothorax beyond 48 hours. Twenty-seven underwent an early video-assisted thoracoscopy (VATS). Fifty-five were observed, chest tubes were manipulated, or an additional one placed. The outcome was compared with the National Trauma Data Bank and controlled for Injury Severity Score. Early VATS reduced length of stay (4.3 vs 9.4 days), days in the intensive care unit (1.3 vs 3.2), and open thoracotomy (0 vs 7). A chest tube undertreats a nonlife-threatening PWC correctable by timely VATs.

Chest tube selection in cardiac and thoracic surgery: a survey of chest tube-related complications and their management

BACKGROUND

Blood accumulating inside chest cavities can lead to serious complications if it is not drained properly. Because life-threatening conditions can result from chest tube occlusion after thoracic surgery, large-bore tubes are generally employed to optimize patency.

AIMS

The aim of this study was to better define problems with current paradigms for chest drainage.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A survey was conducted of North American cardiothoracic surgeons and specialty cardiac surgery nurses. A total of 108 surgeons and 108 nurses responded.

RESULTS

The survey revealed that clogging leading to chest-tube dysfunction is a major concern when choosing tube size. Of surgeons responding, 106 of 106 (100%) had observed chest tube clogging, and 93 of 106 (87%) reported adverse patient outcomes from a clogged tube. Despite techniques such as tube stripping, tapping, and squeezing, up to 51% of surveyed surgeons stated they are not satisfied with currently available tubes and procedures to avoid tube occlusion and some even forbid the stripping maneuver for fear of causing more bleeding by the negative pressures generated. In addition, respondents noted that patients experience increasing discomfort with increasing drain size.

DISCUSSION

The major reason surgeons choose large-diameter chest tubes is linked to concern about the suboptimal available methods to avoid and treat chest-tube clogging. Even though larger tubes are thought to be associated with more pain, physicians generally err on the side of caution to avoid clogging and insert tubes with larger diameters.

CONCLUSION

Results of this survey highlight the frequent problems with clogging with current postsurgical chest drainage systems and suggest the need for innovative solutions to avoid clogging complications and overcome clinician concern and patient pain.

The Active Tube Clearance System a Novel Bedside Chest-Tube Clearance Device

Objective

Chest-tube clogging can lead to complications after heart and lung surgery. Surgeons often choose large-diameter chest tubes or place more than one chest tube when concerned about the potential for clogging. The purpose of this report is to describe the design and function of a proprietary active tube clearance system, a novel device that clears clots and debris from chest tubes.

Device Description

The active tube clearance system is a novel chest tube clearance apparatus developed to maintain chest tube patency. Chest tube clearance is achieved by advancing the specially designed clearance member back and forth within the chest tube under sterile conditions, breaking down and pulling clots back toward the drainage receptacle, thereby leaving the inner portion of the chest tube clear of any obstructing material.

Conclusions

By maintaining chest tube patency, chest tube drainage can be performed more safely, and this apparatus may possibly lead to the use of smaller chest tubes and less invasive insertion techniques.

The Epidemiology of Traumatic Hemothorax in a Level I Trauma Center: Case for Early Video-assisted Thoracoscopic Surgery

OBJECTIVE

Hemothorax is a common sequela of chest trauma. Complications after chest trauma include retained hemothorax and empyema requiring multiple interventions. We studied the epidemiology of hemothorax and its complications at a level I trauma center.

METHODS

The trauma registry was reviewed from Jan 1995 toMay 2005.Allpatients ≥16 years of agewhowere admitted with hemothorax, an AIS chest score of ≥ 3, and did not receive an immediate thoracotomy were entered in the study cohort. The patient demographics, details of the injury event, treatments, hospital length of stay (LOS), complications and outcome were analyzed.

RESULTS

The study cohort of 522 patients with a hemothorax were treated with 685 chest thoracostomy tubes. Overall, the median ISS was 18 and 62% were penetrating injuries. 109 patients (21%) had a retained hemothorax and required placement of ≥ 2 chest tubes with a median LOS of 15 days longer than patients with no retained hemothorax (p < 0.0001). The overall complication rate was 5% (26/522). Of these, 20 patients had empyema (3.8%), 8 patients required decortication, and 6 patients received streptokinase treatment.

CONCLUSION

More than 1 out of every 5 patients undergoing intervention for trauma-induced hemothorax develops a complication. The development of retained hemothorax is associated with empyema in 15.6% of cases and a 2-week median increase in length of stay. Future research into interventions such as Video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery (VATS) on the day of admission to completely evacuate hemothorax is warranted to reduce complication rates, length of stay and cost.

Use of a trauma service clinical pathway to improve patient outcomes for retained traumatic hemothorax

INTRODUCTION

Early evacuation of retained hemothorax (RHTX) has been shown to improve clinical outcomes. In 2006, our trauma surgery service instituted a clinical pathway for management of RHTX that was designed to decrease time to operation and improve patient outcomes. We report our experience with early evacuation of posttraumatic RHTX after instituting a service-wide clinical pathway.

METHODS

From 2006 to 2007, 29 operations were performed by the trauma surgery service for RHTX. Using the clinical pathway, if patients had a persistent effusion on hospital day 2, the patient underwent thoracoscopic (VATS) evacuation of the hemothorax. A case control cohort (24 patients) was generated from 2003 to 2005 of operations for retained hemothorax before implementation of this pathway.

RESULTS

The mean age was 33.2 years. There was no difference in ISS between groups (p = 0.14). The study group had significantly decreased time to operating room (3.0 +/- 0.33 days vs. 9.9 +/- 2.0 days, P = 0.002) and shorter hospital stays (10.8 +/- 0.8 days vs. 30.5 +/- 5.8 days, P = 0.003). All 29 study patients had their hemothorax evacuated by VATS, whereas 14 of 29 control patients had evacuation attempted by VATS (P = 0.0003). There were no differences in complications or reoperation between groups. Total hospital charges for the study group were $46,471 in the study group compared with $126,221 in the control group (P = 0.03).

CONCLUSIONS

Implementation of a clinical pathway for early evacuation of retained hemothorax can significantly improve patient outcomes and decrease hospital costs. Furthermore, trauma surgeons are capable of safely performing thoracic surgery for evacuation of retained hemothorax.

Non-operative management of right side thoracoabdominal penetrating injuries--the value of testing chest tube effluent for bile

INTRODUCTION

While mandatory surgery for all thoracoabdominal penetrating injuries is advocated by some, the high rate of unnecessary operations challenges this approach. However, the consequences of intrathoracic bile remains poorly investigated. We sought to evaluate the outcome of patients who underwent non-operative management of right side thoracoabdominal (RST) penetrating trauma, and the levels of bilirubin obtained from those patients' chest tube effluent.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

We managed non-operatively all stable patients with a single RST penetrating injury. Chest tube effluent samples were obtained six times within (4-8 h; 12-16 h; 20-24 h; 28-32 h; 36-40 h; 48 h and 72 h) of admission for bilirubin measurement and blood for complete blood count, bilirubin, alanine (ALT) and aspartate aminotransferases (AST) assays. For comparison we studied patients with single left thoracic penetrating injury.

RESULTS

Forty-two patients with RST injuries were included. All had liver and lung injuries confirmed by CT scans. Only one patient failed non-operative management. Chest tube bilirubin peaked at 48 h post-trauma (mean 3.3+/-4.1 mg/dL) and was always higher than both serum bilirubin (p<0.05) and chest tube effluent from control group (27 patients with left side thoracic trauma). Serum ALT and AST were higher in RST injury patients (p<0.05). One RST injury patient died of line sepsis.

CONCLUSION

Non-operative management of RST penetrating trauma appears to be safe. Bile originating from the liver injury reaches the right thoracic cavity but does not reflect the severity of that injury. The highest concentration was found in the patient failing non-operative management. The presence of intrathoracic bile in selected patients who sustain RST penetrating trauma, with liver injury, does not preclude non-operative management. Our study suggests that monitoring chest tube effluent bilirubin may provide helpful information when managing a patient non-operatively.

Residual hemothorax after chest tube placement correlates with increased risk of empyema following traumatic injury

BACKGROUND

Empyema complicates tube thoracostomy following trauma in up to 10% of cases. Studies of potential risk factors of empyema have included use of antibiotics, site of injury and technique of chest tube placement. Residual fluid has also been cited as a risk factor for empyema, although the imaging technique to identify this varies.

OBJECTIVE

To determine whether residual hemothorax detected by chest x-ray (CXR) after one or more initial chest tubes predicts an increased risk of empyema.

METHODS

A study of patients admitted to two level I trauma centres between January 7, 2004, and December 31, 2004, was conducted. All patients who received a chest tube in the emergency department, did not undergo thoracotomy within 24 h, and survived more than two days were followed. Empyema was defined as a pleural effusion with positive cultures, and a ratio of pleural fluid lactate dehydrogenase to serum lactate dehydrogenase greater than 0.6 in the setting of elevated leukocyte count and fever. Factors analyzed included the presence of retained hemothorax on CXR after the most recent tube placement in the emergency room, age, mechanism of injury and injury severity score.

RESULTS

A total of 102 patients met the criteria. Nine patients (9%) developed empyema: seven of 21 patients (33%) with residual hemothorax developed empyema versus two of 81 patients (2%) without residual hemothorax developed empyema (P=0.001). Injury severity score was significantly higher in those who developed empyema (31.4+/-26) versus those who did not (22.6+/-13; P=0.03).

CONCLUSIONS

The presence of residual hemothorax detected by CXR after tube thoracostomy should prompt further efforts, including thoracoscopy, to drain it. With increasing injury severity, there may be increased benefit in terms of reducing empyema with this approach.

The role of chest computed tomography in trauma

Chest computed tomography (CCT) evaluation for trauma encompasses two main objectives: (1) The evaluation of the acutely injured in the search for diagnoses and (2) follow up assessment or diagnosis of pulmonary complications in the hospitalised patient. In the acute phase of evaluation, CCT has become particularly helpful for the diagnosis of blunt thoracic aortic injury (BAI), great vessel injury, extent of lung contusion, occult hemothorax, occult pneumothorax, spinal fractures and spinal cord injuries and to determine the tract of transmediastinal gun shot wounds. In the subacute phase, CCT has gained popularity for diagnosing pulmonary embolism and evaluation of retained hemothorax. Technological advances have lead to better diagnostic capabilities that can be obtained quickly but, particularly in the trauma patient, there is little consistent data supporting an outcome improvement in the majority of patients despite changes in clinical management. Further data is needed to support use of CCT in select trauma patient populations to increase useful diagnostic yield and cost effectiveness.

Common complications following thoracic trauma: their prevention and treatment

Although there are a wide range of complications following thoracic trauma, respiratory failure, pneumonia, and pleural sepsis are the most common potentially preventable problems. Respiratory failure and pneumonia are directly related to the severity of the injury and the age and condition of the patient. A program aimed at aggressive pain control, mobilization, and pulmonary care can reduce the risk of respiratory failure, pneumonia, and death in these patients. Pleural sepsis develops in the face of a retained hemothorax, which becomes contaminated with bacteria. The most common source for this contamination is not pneumonia, but external contamination from the wound itself or at the time of placement of the tube thoracostomy. Measures that reduce the volume of retained pleural blood and reduce or eliminate any bacterial contamination are likely to reduce the incidence of pleural sepsis. The authors review these complications and describe a plan to reduce these complications.

Best timing for thoracoscopic evacuation of retained post-traumatic hemothorax

OBJECTIVE

To determine the best timing for thoracoscopic drainage of clotted hemothorax in order to ensure safe and effective results and to identify risk factors associated with drainage failure.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Cohort retrospective study of 139 consecutive patients who underwent thoracoscopic retained hemothorax drainage between April 1997 and May 2005.

RESULTS

The procedure was successful in 102 patients (73.4%), in whom complete evacuation was achieved, with no accumulation of fluid in the pleural cavity requiring reintervention. Conversion to thoracotomy was required in 22 patients (15.8%) because of the inability to attain adequate drainage of clots and collections and lung re-expansion. Fifteen patients (10.8%) required reintervention as a result of fluid accumulation in the pleural cavity and lung collapse, and thoracotomy was performed in all those cases. The best results were obtained when thoracoscopic drainage was performed before the fifth day. There were 33 major post-operative complications including 20 cases of empyema of which 10 required thoracotomy, and 13 bronchopleural leaks, four of which required open surgery. There were no fatal outcomes in the study group.

CONCLUSIONS

Videothoracoscopy must be considered the procedure of choice for the treatment of retained post-traumatic hemothorax. It is a safe and effective procedure allowing the successful treatment of up to 73.4% of patients. Best results are obtained when drainage is performed within the first five days after trauma.

Intrapleural Thrombolysis for the Management of Undrained Traumatic Hemothorax: A Prospective Observational Study

BACKGROUND

Tube thoracostomy is usually sufficient treatment for traumatic hemothorax. Occasionally, significant residual collections remain undrained. Open thoracotomy and video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery (VATS) have been used to manage undrained traumatic hemothoraces (UTHs). Both techniques are invasive and harbor risks. More recently, intrapleural administration of thrombolytic agents (streptokinase and urokinase) has been reported as an effective nonoperative treatment of residual collections caused by a variety of diseases. The role of intrapleural thrombolysis (IT) for the treatment of an UTH is inadequately explored.

METHODS

Patients with an UTH, defined as more than 300 mL of intrathoracic blood estimated by computed tomographic scan on the third day after chest tube insertion, were followed prospectively for 16 months. IT was instituted according to a standardized protocol using streptokinase or urokinase. IT effectiveness, defined by the incidence of successful resolution of the UTH, and IT safety, defined by the incidence of uncomplicated therapy, was calculated.

RESULTS

Of 203 patients with a traumatic hemothorax, managed by tube thoracostomy, 25 (12.3%) developed an UTH. Successful resolution of the UTH was achieved in 23 (92%) patients within 3.4+/-1.4 days. No bleeding or other significant complications related to IT were recorded.

CONCLUSIONS

IT should be the initial treatment of choice for the management of an UTH.

Role of thoracoscopy in acute management of chest injury

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

To review the literature on the use of video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery for the diagnosis and treatment of intrathoracic injuries.

RECENT FINDINGS

Video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery is a relatively recent innovation. It was originally promoted for the treatment of retained hemothorax and the diagnosis of diaphragm injury. It is highly effective for the management of those problems. Recent studies have focused on video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery for treatment of chest wall bleeding, diagnosis of transmediastinal injuries, pericardial window and persistent pneumothorax. In properly selected patients, video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery is extremely efficacious in managing these problems.

SUMMARY

The role of video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery in the management of acute chest injury is expanding. It is an invaluable tool for the trauma surgeon.

Imaging of penetrating chest trauma

This article discusses the role of imaging in evaluating patients who are admitted with penetrating injuries to the chest. Emphasis is placed on the role of multidetector row CT, which has been introduced in the past 5 years into the arena of care for trauma victims. It is important to take full advantage of this new CT technology with its capability to produce high-resolution multiplanar and volumetric images to diagnose penetrating chest injuries. This article emphasizes detection of active bleeding and assessment of the mediastinum for penetrating injury.

Delayed pericardial tamponade after penetrating chest trauma

Delayed pericardial tamponade (PT) after penetrating heart trauma is now a rare condition as a result of advances in medical and surgical management. We report the case of a 32-year-old man with delayed PT after a stab wound from a knife. The initial evaluation was consistent with a traumatic apical myocardial infarction. After an uneventful initial course, the patient developed acute PT, which required emergency surgery. A thrombus was discovered over a laceration in the mid-segment of the left anterior descending artery and a simple suture was performed.

Video-assisted thoracic surgery: state of the art in trauma care

The majority of chest-injured patients are managed with resuscitation and placement of chest tubes. Further interventions are required for complications or missed injuries. Video-assisted thoracic surgery (VATS) has become standard in elective surgery. Our purpose was to review the use of VATS in trauma. The literature and our experience support the use of VATS for specific indications. These indications are: (1) management of retained haemothorax; (2) management of persistent pneumothorax; (3) evaluation of the diaphragm in penetrating thoraco-abdominal injuries and management; (4) management of infected pleural space collections; and (5) diagnosis and management of on-going bleeding in haemodynamically stable patients. VATS for specific indications in trauma is associated with improved outcomes and decreased length of stay. VATS provides diagnostic and therapeutic benefit and should be included in the trauma surgeon's clinical armamentarium.

The Ultrasound Screen for Penetrating Truncal Trauma

A prospective blinded pilot study was performed at an urban level 1 trauma center to evaluate the efficacy of ultrasound in ruling out penetrating visceral truncal injury. For 8 months, 49 nonconsecutive patients who presented with truncal gunshot and stab wounds were evaluated by a 10-MHz ultrasound tranducer probe. The deepest muscle bundle and the fascia enveloping it was examined by ultrasound. These images were compared to the equivalent contralateral unaffected side of the patient. All the patients then underwent standard testing to evaluate for potential intracavitary injury. Forty-nine patients with a mean age of 28 years (SD, 8.8) were evaluated by ultrasound. A total of 58 injuries were evaluated of which 37 were stab wounds and 21 were gunshot wounds. Thoracoabdominal and back and flank injuries were the most commonly evaluated injuries. There were 20 true positives, 20 false positives, and 18 true negatives, each with approximately twice as many stab as gunshot wounds. There were no false negatives. The sensitivity and negative predictive value of ultrasound in determining clinically significant truncal visceral injury in penetrating truncal trauma is 100 per cent. The specificity and positive predictive value are both approximately 50 per cent. Ultrasonic examination of the injured abdominal wall layers in truncal penetrating trauma is an excellent screening tool. Simple comparative assessment with the unaffected contralateral side allows a highly sensitive method of decreasing the number of potentially morbid, time consuming, and expensive tests that are currently employed to rule out visceral injury.

Technology-driven triage of abdominal trauma: the emerging era of nonoperative management

Selective nonoperative management of blunt or penetrating abdominal trauma is safe, has eliminated the complications associated with nontherapeutic laparotomies, and is cost-effective. Appropriately selected investigations, such as focused abdominal sonography for trauma, diagnostic peritoneal lavage, spiral computed tomography (CT) scan, diagnostic laparoscopy, or thoracoscopy and angiography, play a critical role in the triage of patients. Future technological advances, such as improvement of the ultrasonic hardware and software that provide automated interpretation and the availability of portable CT scan machines in the emergency room, may improve the speed and accuracy of the initial evaluation. Improvement of the optical system of minilaparoscopes may allow reliable bedside laparoscopy for suspected diaphragmatic injuries.

[Videothoracospy in thoracic trauma and penetrating injuries]

Videothoracoscopy represents a valid and useful approach in some patients with blunt chest trauma or penetrating thoracic injury. This technique has been validated for the treatment of clotted hemothorax or posttraumatic empyema, traumatic chylothorax, traumatic pneumothorax, in patients with hemodynamic stability. Moreover, it is probably the most reliable technique for the diagnosis of diaphragmatic injury. It is also useful for the extraction of intrathoracic projectiles and foreign bodies. This technique might be useful in hemodynamically stable patients with continued bleeding or for the exploration of patients with penetrating injury in the cardiac area, although straightforward data are lacking to confirm those indications. Thoracotomy or median sternotomy remain indicated in patients with hemodynamic instability or those that cannot tolerate lateral decubitus position or one-lung ventilation. Performing video-surgery in the trauma setting require expertise in both video-assisted thoracic surgery and chest trauma management. The contra-indications to videothoracoscopy and indications for converting the procedure to an open thoracotomy should be perfectly known by surgeons performing video-assisted thoracic surgery in the trauma setting. Conversion to thoracotomy or median sternotomy should be performed without delay whenever needed to avoid blood loss and achieve an adequate procedure.

Penetrating injuries of the chest: indications for operation

Penetrating injuries to the chest present a frequent and challenging problem. The majority of these injuries can be managed non-operatively. The selection of patients for operation or observation can be made by clinical examination and appropriate investigations. The trauma ultrasound has become a valuable first-line tool to rule out pericardial tamponade. Spiral computed tomography of the chest is increasingly used to evaluate transmediastinal gunshot wounds and direct, if needed, further organ-specific tests, such as esophagography, aortography, or bronchoscopy. Minimally invasive techniques have found sound application in the thoracoscopic evacuation of undrained hemothorax and the laparoscopic evaluation of diaphragmatic trauma. In the operative arena, lung-sparing techniques with the use of staplers, like wedge resection and tractotomy, have allowed easier, faster, and effective control of bleeding without sacrificing unnecessarily normal pulmonary parenchyma. Knowledge of the new advancements in the field of thoracic trauma will allow surgeons to provide expert care and improved outcomes.

Timing, Safety, and Efficacy of Thoracoscopic Evacuation of Undrained Post-Traumatic Hemothorax

Residual post-traumatic hemothorax (RPTH) occurs in 3 to 8 per cent of patients with tube thoracostomy and may cause serious infectious complications. Surgical evacuation is recommended, and thoracoscopic evacuation (THEVA) tends to replace open thoracotomy for this purpose. The objective of this study is to evaluate the optimal timing, safety, and efficacy of THEVA. Over 5 years patients with tube thoracostomy for trauma who had unresolved opacities on plain chest radiograph were evaluated by CT. If the residual fluid volume was estimated to be more than 500 mL3 on CT the patients were offered THEVA. Unstable patients were excluded. A score ranging from one (easy) to three (difficult) was used to grade the difficulty of the operation according to the attending surgeon's perception. Of 1728 chest trauma patients 143 (8%) were evaluated by CT for persistent opacity on plain film, 31 (1.8%) were found to have RPTH, and 24 (1.4%) were eventually taken for THEVA at 3.5 ± 2 days after admission. Low oxygen saturation (less than 94%) was found in 58 per cent of patients before THEVA but in only 25 per cent after THEVA ( P = 0.02). The majority of chest tubes (75%) were removed within 4 days of the operation. Two patients required conversion to thoracotomy. THEVA done within 3 days of admission was associated with a lower operative difficulty score, shorter hospital stay, and a trend toward shorter intraoperative time compared with THEVA done after 3 days of admission. All patients had effective resolution of their radiographic opacities after THEVA. Three patients developed a complication (urinary tract infection, pneumonia, and persistent air leak). We conclude that patients with significant RPTH and without major physiologic compromise are appropriate candidates for THEVA. The procedure is safe, evacuates PRTH effectively, and improves the respiratory function of affected patients. Ideally it should be performed within 3 days of admission.

Around-the-dock Attending Radiology Coverage is Essential to Avoid Mistakes in the Care of Trauma Patients

Financial constraints due to increasing operating cost and decreased reimbursement do not allow many hospitals to maintain coverage by attending radiologists around the clock (CARAC). Preliminary film readings by radiology trainees may be inaccurate. In trauma, decisions are made fast and are often based on these preliminary readings. To examine whether there are significant discrepancies between preliminary readings (PRs) and final readings (FRs) of CT scans of trauma patients we prospectively recorded PRs (done immediately by radiology residents) and FRs (done the following working day by radiology attendings) over a period of 6 months for trauma CT scans done between 5 pm and 7 am on weekdays or weekends. A discrepancy was classified as significant if a change in management was instituted after FR. In 42 of 383 (11%) trauma patients there was a discrepancy between PR and FR. Patients with discrepancies had a higher Injury Severity Score, higher incidence of penetrating trauma, longer hospital stay, higher hospital charges, and higher mortality than patients without any discrepancy. Most of the discrepancies were found on abdominal CT scans. The lower the level of radiology resident doing the PR the higher the likelihood of a discrepancy. In 20 patients (5%) a significant discrepancy was found. We conclude that the absence of CARAC results in inaccurate FRs risking optimal trauma patient care. The institutional savings realized by avoiding CARAC may be offset by the cost of additional care provided to patients who have delayed diagnosis and treatment due to the lack of it.

Blunt thoraco-abdominal injury

Recent advances in blunt thoraco-abdominal trauma management include improvements in imaging, particularly in trauma bay ultrasound. Indications for non-operative management have expanded for solid organ and aortic injury. The physiology of abdominal compartment syndrome continues to be defined, with resulting improvements in care.

Penetrating wounds of the torso

Penetrating trauma is on the increase as a result of interpersonal violence throughout the world. It is essential that military surgeons are familiar with such injuries and trained not only in the principles of their management, but also have first-hand operative experience before deployment in the field of conflict. More often than not, this experience is to be gained in the civilian urban setting in countries such as South Africa and the USA. The article addresses the first requirement--the principles of management--and outlines basic measures to enable those unfamiliar with penetrating wounds of the torso to make a reasonable and directed approach to dealing with these patients. It does not attempt to give definitive advice on specific injuries. It is organised according to anatomical regions, but emphasises that this is only in order to put shape to the article; penetrating injuries frequently having no respect for anatomical boundaries. Particular attention is drawn to difficult areas such as mediastinal injuries, and to modern concepts of 'damage control' surgery and the 'abdominal compartment syndrome'. The emphasis throughout is on how to get out of trouble and where particular danger spots may be anticipated. Reference will be made to the differences that may be expected within the military environment as opposed to the civilian setting, where rapid and (usually) safe evacuation to a well-equipped secure facility may not be possible. The article aims to raise the awareness of those involved in the care of patients with penetrating wounds of the torso that a methodical approach with a practised team of experienced individuals can salvage injuries which at first sight may seem terrifying or hopeless.

Imaging in thoracic trauma: the trauma surgeon's perspective

Thoracic trauma is a common cause of significant disability and mortality. Most thoracic injury in developed countries results from motor vehicle crashes (MVC). Imaging of patients with thoracic trauma must be accurate and timely to avoid preventable death. Trauma surgeons prioritize imaging options based on the patient's hemodynamic status, associated injuries, and age. The screening test for the detection of life-threatening thoracic injury is the supine anteroposterior (AP) chest radiograph. Rib fractures are a marker for serious associated injuries, including abdominal injuries. Rib fractures are especially ominous in children and the elderly. Thoracic aortic injury is associated with high-speed mechanisms of injury and can occur in the absence of radiographic signs. Chest computed tomography (CT) can be used as a screening and diagnostic tool for suspected aortic injury. Aortography is reserved for patients with high suspicion of aortic injury or for confirmation of CT scan diagnosis.

Empyema and Restrictive Pleural Processes after Blunt Trauma: An Under-Recognized Cause of Respiratory Failure

Respiratory failure is a common complication among patients sustaining major blunt trauma. This is usually due to the underlying pulmonary injury, pneumonia, or adult respiratory distress syndrome. However, we have frequently found these patients to actually have a pleural process as the cause of their respiratory failure. Our objective was to assess the frequency of empyema and restrictive pleural processes after blunt trauma and their contribution to respiratory failure. We retrospectively reviewed all blunt trauma patients over a 5-year period who required a thoracotomy and decortication for empyema. Twenty-eight patients with blunt trauma required a thoracotomy and decortication for empyema. The most common finding was infected, loculated hemothorax/effusion in 23 patients, whereas 5 had an associated pneumonia. Chest radiographs were nondiscriminating, whereas CT scans in 25 patients showed previously unrecognized fluid collections, air-fluid levels, or gas bubbles. Neither thoracentesis nor placement of additional chest tubes was helpful. Positive cultures were uncommon. Ventilator dependence was present preoperatively in 13 patients who were on the ventilator an average of 13 days preoperatively and only 5.8 days postoperatively. Several patients believed to have adult respiratory distress syndrome were weaned within 72 hours of operation. All patients were ultimately cured. Empyema is an under-recognized complication of blunt trauma and may contribute to respiratory failure and ventilator dependence. Although difficult to diagnose, empyema should be considered in blunt trauma patients with respiratory failure and an abnormal chest radiograph. CT aids in the diagnosis, and the results of surgical treatment are excellent.