Lymphoproliferative disease presenting as obstructive uropathy after renal transplantation

Ultrasound for monitoring different stages of post-transplant lymphoproliferative disorder in a transplanted kidney: A case report and review of the literature

RATIONALE

Post-transplant lymphoproliferative disorder (PTLD) is a well-recognized, but uncommon complication in patients with kidney transplantation, which poses challenges in diagnosis and poor prognosis due to its low incidence and nonspecific clinical manifestations. As a routine follow-up examination method for kidney transplant patients, ultrasound (US) plays a significant role in the diagnosis of PTLD. Therefore, it is critical to evaluate the ultrasonic characteristics of PTLD in transplanted kidney patients for early detection and diagnosis.

PATIENT CONCERNS

A 59-year-old female patient was unexpectedly found with a mass in the hilum of the transplanted kidney 12th month after transplantation, which gradually grew up in the following 4 months. The latest US examination found hydronephrosis. Contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) demonstrated a hypo-enhancement pattern in arterial and parenchymal phases and showed a new irregular area lacking perceivable intensification within the mass, which was considered necrosis. Meanwhile, the patient developed an acute increase in serum creatinine from 122 to 195 μmol/L.

DIAGNOSIS

A US-guided biopsy was conducted with the final pathological diagnosis of PTLD (polymorphic).

INTERVENTIONS

After receiving 3 times of rituximab and symptomatic treatment, blood creatinine returned to normal but the mass was still progressing in the patient. Therefore, the treatment approach was modified to immune-chemotherapy.

OUTCOMES

The patient was in a stable condition to date.

LESSONS

PTLD is a rare complication in a transplanted kidney. US and CEUS are the preferred imaging methods in renal transplant patients due to their good repeatability and no nephrotoxicity. This case demonstrates that continuous dynamic monitoring by using US and CEUS has significant value in the detection and diagnosis of PTLD in a transplanted kidney, suggesting early clinical intervention to avoid further progression.

Post-transplant lymphoproliferative disorder presenting as a tumor adjacent to the renal allograft: A case report and review of the literature

Post-transplant lymphoproliferative disorder (PTLD) is a potentially fatal complication of solid organ transplantation. The current report presents the case of a 42-year-old male who developed PTLD within the first year following renal transplantation. The disorder manifested as a tumor adjacent to the lower pole of the renal allograft and resulted in urinary obstruction. Durable complete remission was achieved as a result of surgical resection followed by a reduction in immunosuppression and low-dose rituximab-based chemotherapy, indicating that this therapeutic strategy may be safe and effective for the treatment of specific cases of localized and resectable PTLD.

Posttransplant lymphoproliferative disorder in the wall of a lymphocele: a case report

Posttransplant lymphoproliferative disorder (PTLD) is a well-known complication of renal transplantation with increased incidence after introduction of more powerful immunosuppressive drugs. Presenting symptoms are nonspecific; some patients may be entirely asymptomatic. Herein we have reported a case of PTLD arising in the lymphocele wall presenting with B-symptoms and deterioration of graft function. A 62-year-old-female with end-stage renal disease secondary to Balkan endemic nephropathy and positive Epstein-Barr virus (EBV) serology before transplantation received a renal transplant from a deceased donor. Six months after transplantation she was admitted to the hospital with a 1-week history of malaise, weight loss, anorexia, night sweats, and febrile episodes. Multisliced computed tomography demonstrated a cystic structure at the renal hilus. Graft function deteriorated, so the patient underwent puncture of the lymphocele. Urgent graftectomy was necessary to stop the bleeding. Pathohistology demonstrated EBV-positive, CD20-positive PTLD. The patient received 6 cycles of chemotherapy and continued on hemodialysis. We concluded that a high index of suspicion for PTLD should be maintained when evaluating lymphoceles arising in the later posttransplantation period. Irrespective of their imaging features, biopsy should be performed to exclude PTLD.

Posttransplantation lymphoproliferative disorders in renal transplant recipients: report of over 20 years of experience

INTRODUCTION

Despite the benefits of immunosuppressive medications to improve graft function, they have several adverse effects, such as development of neoplasms in renal transplant recipients. Posttransplantation lymphoproliferative disorders (PTLDs) are not uncommon complications, so we conducted a study to evaluate the characteristics of affected patients.

METHODS

We enrolled 2117 kidney recipients from June 1984 to March 2004 in order to find pathological and clinical evidence of neoplasms. We collected and analyzed all data on PTLD patients.

RESULTS

Overall there were 46 recipients with different types of neoplasms, among which the most common types were diseases of the skin (24 cases, 52.2%), Kaposi's sarcoma (15 cases, 32.6%), and PTLD (14 cases, 30.4%). The mean (+/- SD) age of PTLD patients at the time of transplantation was 37.86 +/- 9.67 years and 42.8% were women. Median and mean (+/- SD) time interval to PTLD diagnosis were 38.5 and 50.35 +/- 41.7 months, respectively (range 1 to 146 months). Types of PTLD in these patients were kidney lymphoma (14.3%); gastrointestinal (14.3%); brain lymphoma; tonsils; palatine; Hodgkin's lymphoma, large cell lymphoma, and acute lymphoblastic lymphoma (each 7.1%), with 28.6% unspecified types. The 1-, 5-, and 10-year patient survival rates after transplantation were 71.4%, 51.4%, and 44.3%, respectively. Despite discontinuing immunosuppressive therapy in PTLD patients, five of six surviving had graft function up to a mean time of 105.4 +/- 57.6 months after transplantation.

CONCLUSION

Our findings showed that the prevalence of PTLD was 0.66%, which was less than reports from Western countries. The fact that there were surviving grafts for a considerable time despite discontinuing immunosuppressive therapy is of great importance.

Development of Malignancy Following Living Donor Kidney Transplantation

BACKGROUND

Malignancy following renal transplantation is an important medical problem during the long-term follow-up. We studied some features of the cancers that developed in our patients.

METHODS

We retrospectively reviewed all patients who underwent renal transplantation and developed malignancy from July 1984 to July 2004.

RESULTS

The 2117 patients who underwent living donor kidney transplantation during the 19-year period had a mean follow-up of 81.1 +/- 61 months. During the follow-up, 38 patients (1.8%) developed cancer: 14 Kaposi's sarcomas, 11 lymphoproliferative diseases, four squamous cell carcinomas of the skin, two basal cell carcinomas, one breast, one ovary, one melanoma, one seminoma, one lung, and one ovary. Mean age at transplantation in the malignancy cases was higher than the other recipients (43.5 +/- 12.1 vs 32 +/- 13.9 years) (P = .000). A Kaposi's sarcoma occurred earlier compared with the other cancers (23 +/- 22 vs 62 +/- 44 months P < .05); most of these patients were over 40 years at transplantation (P < .05). We also observed that patients treated with mycophenolate mofetil developed cancer earlier than the others (19 vs 52 months; P = .001). None of the cases with lymphoma had a history of antilymphocytic agent therapy. The 10-year patient survival was 73%.

CONCLUSION

The prevalence of cancer (1.8%) was among the lowest compared with other studies possibly due to implementing a living donor kidney transplantation program that required a low frequency of induction therapy.

Recommendations for the outpatient surveillance of renal transplant recipients. American Society of Transplantation

Many complications after renal transplantation can be prevented if they are detected early. Guidelines have been developed for the prevention of diseases in the general population, but there are no comprehensive guidelines for the prevention of diseases and complications after renal transplantation. Therefore, the Clinical Practice Guidelines Committee of the American Society of Transplantation developed these guidelines to help physicians and other health care workers provide optimal care for renal transplant recipients. The guidelines are also intended to indirectly help patients receive the access to care that they need to ensure long-term allograft survival, by attempting to systematically define what that care encompasses. The guidelines are applicable to all adult and pediatric renal transplant recipients, and they cover the outpatient screening for and prevention of diseases and complications that commonly occur after renal transplantation. They do not cover the diagnosis and treatment of diseases and complications after they become manifest, and they do not cover the pretransplant evaluation of renal transplant candidates. The guidelines are comprehensive, but they do not pretend to cover every aspect of care. As much as possible, the guidelines are evidence-based, and each recommendation has been given a subjective grade to indicate the strength of evidence that supports the recommendation. It is hoped that these guidelines will provide a framework for additional discussion and research that will improve the care of renal transplant recipients.

Focal posttransplantation lymphoproliferative disorder at the renal allograft hilum

OBJECTIVE

This report describes the imaging characteristics of focal posttransplantation lymphoproliferative disorder.

CONCLUSION

Posttransplantation lymphoproliferative disorder may be limited to the allograft. A focal complex mass in the renal allograft hilum surrounding the main renal blood vessels is a common finding and can be visualized with sonography. MR imaging can help increase diagnostic confidence.

Postransplant lymphoproliferative disorder localized near the allograft in renal transplantation

BACKGROUND

Posttransplant lymphoproliferative disorder (PTLD), a complication of immunosuppression, develops in approximately 1% of renal allograft recipients. Typically, PTLD is a proliferation of B-cells associated with Epstein-Barr virus (EBV) infection; it is said to be most often a systemic disease. Involvement occasionally is localized near the allograft.

METHODS

This is a retrospective analysis of all cases of PTLD in recipients of 1474 renal transplants performed at University of Alabama at Birmingham between 1993 and 1997.

RESULTS

Of 14 patients developing PTLD, 10 had disease localized near the allograft. The mean interval from transplantation to diagnosis was 221 +/- 70 days. All patients presented with renal dysfunction; an ultrasound examination revealed a hilar mass, with hydronephrosis in five and stenosis of renal vessels in eight. No patient had lymphadenopathy, according to computerized tomographic or magnetic resonance imaging findings. After reduction of immunosuppressive therapy, seven required a nephrectomy because of rejection, progressive dysfunction, or mass enlargement. Tissue recovered in four patients was consistent with PTLD; the tumors in the remaining three patients were unresectable and regressed. One patient died 1 month after a nephrectomy, and another died 4 years after surgery; neither had evidence of PTLD when they died. Three patients retain functional grafts without clinical or radiographical evidence of progression. All patients with disseminated disease died.

CONCLUSIONS

In a large cohort of renal allograft recipients, PTLD affected 1%. Disease localized near the allograft was the most common variant. For most patients with localized disease, the outcome was graft loss, and the mortality was low. Localized PTLD should be considered in the differential diagnosis of allograft dysfunction in the 1st posttransplant year.

A combination study design to examine mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) and PTLD in renal transplant patients

Renal transplant recipients who are chronically immunosuppressed by drugs are at a higher risk of developing malignancies. Commonly observed malignancies are several forms of posttransplant lymphoproliferative disorders (PTLD), skin, lip and gynaecological cancers. The risk is associated with many risk factors including the extent of immunosuppression. Mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) is an immunosuppressant, indicated for the prophylaxis of organ rejection in patients receiving allogenic renal and heart transplants. During the European approval of MMF for renal transplantation, the question was raised as to whether the use of MMF was associated with an increased risk of PTLD in comparison with alternate immunosuppressive regimens. In response, F. Hoffman-La Roche Ltd set up a prospective observational cohort study with a companion case-control study. This paper describes the objectives and the methods of these studies along with the rationale of the methodology.

Posttransplantation lymphoproliferative disorder in a renal allograft recipient

As a complication of immunosuppressive therapy, solid organ and bone marrow transplant recipients have an increased risk of developing post transplant lymphoproliferative disorder (PTLD). Epstein-Barr virus (EBV) infection and the degree of immunosuppression have been identified as risk factors for the development of this complication. The clinical presentation includes a spectrum of disorders ranging from a benign infectious mononucleosis-like syndrome with fever and cervical adenopathy to multiorgan failure leading to death. Although, T-cell lesions have been described, PTLD is usually associated with a polyclonal or monoclonal B-cell proliferation. In this report, we present a renal transplant recipient with a perirenal mass diagnosed as PTLD.

Neo-adjuvant hormonal therapy of prostate cancer

At present, only locally confined carcinoma of the prostate can be cured if all of the tumor tissue can be removed by surgery [36]. Early detection strategies using serum prostate-specific antigen (PSA), digital rectal examination (DRE) and transrectal ultrasound (TRUS) have been increasingly used. However, exact clinical determination of the local tumor extension is only possible to a limited extent [4, 13, 28, 34]. Up to 60% of clinical locally confined tumors are understaged after histopathological examination of the radical prostatectomy specimen. Furthermore a high incidence of positive margins of up to 60% has been reported [7, 21]. Although a clear surgical margin does not exclude local or distant disease recurrence, it is regarded as a good prognostic factor [3, 25]. Androgen withdrawal prior to radical prostatectomy is an attractive theoretical option to decrease the risk of disease recurrence, since tumor regression can be induced by any procedure that reduces the intracellular concentration of dihydrotesterone by more than 80%. The benefit of preoperative medical androgen deprivation is controversial [6-8, 13, 15-17, 20, 23, 35, 37]. A priori a benefit would not be expected in any case if androgen withdrawal had no effect on the tumor. We therefore investigated the effects of a neo-adjuvant androgen-ablative therapy (NAT) in a large population of 375 patients who underwent radical retropubic prostatectomy (RRP) after NAT. We report in particular the effects of NAT on prostate volume measured by TRUS, PSA, clinical stage and tumor morphology including positive surgical margins. Furthermore the recently reported first results of prospective randomized trials comparing RRP alone versus NAT plus RRP are discussed to analyze the possible impact of NAT.