SYSTEMATIC SEXTANT BIOPSIES IMPROVE PREOPERATIVE PREDICTION OF PELVIC LYMPH NODE METASTASES IN PATIENTS WITH CLINICALLY LOCALIZED PROSTATIC CARCINOMA:

Disease progression and survival in patients with prostate carcinoma and positive lymph nodes after radical retropubic prostatectomy

OBJECTIVE

To determine disease progression and survival in patients with lymph node-positive prostate carcinoma after ascending radical retropubic prostatectomy (RP) and pelvic lymphadenectomy with different forms of postoperative adjuvant treatment.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

We analysed 82 patients with lymph node metastases at the time of surgery and who had a RP between 1993 and 2002. Data from clinical records and follow-up questionnaires were used. Overall survival, time to clinical disease progression and time to biochemical progression were used as endpoints to assess the outcome. Clinical progression was defined as documented local recurrence or distant metastases, and biochemical as an increase in prostate-specific antigen (PSA) of > or = 0.4 ng/mL. Variables analysed included PSA level, Gleason score before and after RP, clinical and pathological stage, number of positive lymph nodes and hormone therapy after RP. The statistical assessment included univariate regression analysis, and to analyse the distribution of clinical findings in different groups, Mantel-Haenszel statistics were used to test for differences in the numbers of patients. Survival and progression-free interval were assessed by Kaplan-Meier estimates and differences between groups calculated by log-rank statistics and Cox regression models.

RESULTS

The median (range) follow-up was 55 (10-125) months. Adjuvant hormonal treatment was used in 77 patients, five of whom had immediate adjuvant radiotherapy, and nine delayed radiotherapy because of local progression or symptomatic bone metastases; five had no additional treatment. The rates for 5- and 10-year overall survival, clinical progression-free survival and biochemical progression-free survival were 84% and 79%, 83% and 77%, and 70% and 60%, respectively. Ten patients died (12%), eight (10%) of them from the cancer; bone metastases were detected in nine (11%). Local recurrences developed in three (4%) patients, 10 (12%) had a PSA increase of > or = 0.4 ng/mL alone and 58 (71%) had no signs of progression, but two died from other causes.

CONCLUSIONS

Most patients with prostate cancer who had RP and pelvic lymphadenectomy followed by adjuvant hormone therapy, and who had lymph node metastases at the time of surgery, had excellent overall and progression-free survival in the long term.

The percentage of positive biopsy cores as a predictor of disease recurrence in patients with prostate cancer treated with radical prostatectomy

OBJECTIVE

To analyse the prognostic value of the percentage of positive biopsy cores (PPBC) in determining the pathological features and biochemical outcome of patients with prostate cancer treated by radical prostatectomy, as published data evaluating the prognostic value of PPBC in such patients have limitations.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

A group of 534 patients with clinically localized prostate cancer was selected. The PPBC was defined as the number of positive biopsy cores/total number of biopsy cores x 100, and grouped into categories of <25%, 25.1-50%, 50.1-75% and 75.1-100%. Patients were divided in low-, intermediate- and high-risk groups according to the usual variables.

RESULTS

The mean follow-up was 60.5 months. PPBC was associated with the preoperative serum prostate-specific antigen (PSA) level, biopsy Gleason score and clinical stage. On multivariate analysis, PPBC was a significant predictor of extraprostatic disease and seminal vesicle involvement. Of patients in the four PPBC categories, 16%, 27%, 33% and 60%, respectively, had biochemical recurrence (P < 0.001), and on Cox regression analysis, PPBC was an independent predictor of disease recurrence. After segregating patients into risk groups the PPBC further stratified patients using thresholds of 75% (P = 0.006), 25% (P = 0.026) and 50% (P = 0.011) for low-, intermediate- and high-risk groups, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

We confirmed, with a longer follow-up, the clinical utility of the PPBC in determining the pathological features and biochemical outcome of patients with prostate cancer treated with radical prostatectomy, and established thresholds for use in patients in the three risk groups.

Carcinoma extent in prostate needle biopsy tissue in the prediction of whole gland tumor volume in a screening population

Increasing prostate tumor volume has been shown to correlate with numerous adverse prognostic indicators for patients with prostate carcinoma The ability to predict tumor volume from pretreatment parameters is potentially critical in the stratification of patients for different management strategies. We assessed the capacity of preoperative variables to predict tumor volume in 100 men diagnosed with prostate cancer in a prostate-specific antigen (PSA)-based screening program. Preoperative information included total serum PSA concentration and needle biopsy tissue variables, including Gleason score, number of positive cores, linear extent of carcinoma in millimeters, greatest percentage of carcinoma (in a single core), total percentage of carcinoma (all cores), presence of perineural invasion, and percentage of high-grade carcinoma. The postoperative end point was total tumor volume in radical prostatectomy tissue, calculated by image analysis. We determined independently significant factors and generated a predictive modelfor whole gland tumor volume. Total tumor volume was related significantly in multivariate analysis to 3 preoperative variables: linear extent of carcinoma, exponential number of positive cores, and serum PSA. A predictive model generated based on these 3 variables accounted for only 65% of the natural deviance of the data owing to data-point scatter for individual patients, suggesting that additional variables are needed to more accurately predict tumor volume. Findings highlight the importance of reporting quantitative measures of tumor amount in prostate needle biopsy specimens; several measures of tumor extent (vs 1 measure) provide maximal information on prostate cancer size.