1
|
Hurwitz MD, Halabi S, Archer L, McGinnis LS, Kuettel MR, DiBiase SJ, Small EJ. Combination external beam radiation and brachytherapy boost with androgen deprivation for treatment of intermediate-risk prostate cancer: long-term results of CALGB 99809. Cancer 2011; 117:5579-88. [PMID: 22535500 PMCID: PMC3338200 DOI: 10.1002/cncr.26203] [Citation(s) in RCA: 25] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/19/2011] [Revised: 03/21/2011] [Accepted: 03/24/2011] [Indexed: 11/06/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Combined transperineal prostate brachytherapy and external beam radiation therapy (EBRT) is widely used for treatment of prostate cancer. Long-term efficacy and toxicity results of a multicenter phase 2 trial assessing combination of EBRT and transperineal prostate brachytherapy boost with androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) for intermediate-risk prostate cancer are presented. METHODS Intermediate-risk patients per Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center/National Comprehensive Cancer Network criteria received 6 months of ADT, and 45 grays (Gy) EBRT to the prostate and seminal vesicles, followed by transperineal prostate brachytherapy with I125 (100 Gy) or Pd103 (90 Gy). Toxicity was graded using the National Cancer Institute Common Toxicity Criteria version 2 and Radiation Therapy Oncology Group late radiation morbidity scoring systems. Disease-free survival (DFS) was defined as time from enrollment to progression (biochemical, local, distant, or prostate cancer death). In addition to the protocol definition of biochemical failure (3 consecutive prostate-specific antigen rises>1.0 ng/mL after 18 months from treatment start), the 1997 American Society for Therapeutic Radiology and Oncology (ASTRO) consensus and Phoenix definitions were also assessed in defining DFS. The Kaplan-Meier method was used to estimate DFS and overall survival. RESULTS Sixty-one of 63 enrolled patients were eligible. Median follow-up was 73 months. Late grade 2 and 3 toxicity, excluding sexual dysfunction, occurred in 20% and 3% of patients. Six-year DFS applying the protocol definition, 1997 ASTRO consensus, and Phoenix definitions was 87.1%, 75.1%, and 84.9%. Six deaths occurred; only 1 was attributed to prostate cancer. Six-year overall survival was 96.1%. CONCLUSIONS In a cooperative setting, combination of EBRT and transperineal prostate brachytherapy boost plus ADT resulted in excellent DFS with acceptable late toxicity for patients with intermediate-risk prostate cancer.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mark D Hurwitz
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Dana-Farber/Brigham and Women's Cancer Center, Brigham and Women's Hospital, and Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts 02115, USA.
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
2
|
Biagioli MC, Hoffe SE. Emerging Technologies in Prostate Cancer Radiation Therapy: Improving the Therapeutic Window. Cancer Control 2010; 17:223-32. [DOI: 10.1177/107327481001700403] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/15/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Radiation therapy is a standard of care in the treatment of prostate cancer. Relatively recent advances in technologies in the delivery of radiation therapy are altering our current approach to treatment of prostate cancer. Methods This review discusses the results of retrospective, prospective, and randomized clinical trials that have evaluated clinical outcomes in prostate cancer treated with newer radiation therapy technologies. Results Randomized trials have demonstrated that higher doses of radiation therapy improve clinical outcomes but with increased toxicity to normal tissue. The introduction of more conformal radiation therapy techniques such as intensity-modulated radiation therapy, proton therapy, stereotactic body radiotherapy, and brachytherapy have allowed for further dose escalation with simultaneous reduction in toxicity. However, use of more conformal treatments requires a better understanding of prostate motion and the ability to track prostate movements in real time. Conclusions Technological advancements have improved radiation dose delivery to the prostate and have reduced normal tissue toxicity. Randomized trials are warranted to ultimately evaluate clinical benefit and outcomes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Matthew C. Biagioli
- Radiation Oncology Program at the H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center & Research Institute, Tampa, Florida
| | - Sarah E. Hoffe
- Radiation Oncology Program at the H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center & Research Institute, Tampa, Florida
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Song Y, Chan MF, Burman C, Cann D. Comparison of two treatment approaches for prostate cancer: intensity-modulated radiation therapy combined with 125I seed-implant brachytherapy or 125I seed-implant brachytherapy alone. J Appl Clin Med Phys 2008; 9:1-14. [PMID: 18714275 PMCID: PMC5721712 DOI: 10.1120/jacmp.v9i2.2283] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/10/2006] [Revised: 01/15/2007] [Accepted: 01/03/2008] [Indexed: 11/23/2022] Open
Abstract
The purpose of the present study was to assess the results of two different treatment approaches for clinically localized prostate cancer: intensity‐modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) followed by I125 seed‐implant brachytherapy and I125 seed‐implant brachytherapy alone. We studied our 30 most recent consecutive patients. The sample population consisted of 15 cases treated with IMRT (50.4 Gy) followed by I125 seed‐implant boost (95 Gy), and 15 cases treated with I125 seed implant only (144 Gy). We analyzed established dosimetric indices and various clinical parameters. In addition, we also evaluated and compared the acute urinary morbidities of the two treatment approaches, as assessed by the international prostate symptom score (IPSS). In our series, acute urinary morbidity was slightly increased with IMRT followed by I125 seed‐implant brachytherapy as compared with I125 seed‐implant brachytherapy alone. In addition, we observed no statistically significant correlation between the IPSS and the maximum or mean urethral dose. The combination of IMRT and seed‐implant brachytherapy presents an alternative opportunity to treat clinically localized prostate cancer. The full potential of the procedure needs to be further investigated. PACS number: 87.53.Tf
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yulin Song
- Department of Medical Physics, Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, Dover, New Jersey, U.S.A
| | - Maria F Chan
- Department of Medical Physics, Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, Dover, New Jersey, U.S.A
| | - Chandra Burman
- Department of Medical Physics, Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, Dover, New Jersey, U.S.A
| | - Donald Cann
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, Dover, New Jersey, U.S.A
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Singh AK, Guion P, Susil RC, Citrin DE, Ning H, Miller RW, Ullman K, Smith S, Crouse NS, Godette DJ, Stall BR, Coleman CN, Camphausen K, Ménard C. Early observed transient prostate-specific antigen elevations on a pilot study of external beam radiation therapy and fractionated MRI guided high dose rate brachytherapy boost. Radiat Oncol 2006; 1:28. [PMID: 16914054 PMCID: PMC1564026 DOI: 10.1186/1748-717x-1-28] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/17/2006] [Accepted: 08/16/2006] [Indexed: 01/29/2023] Open
Abstract
Purpose To report early observation of transient PSA elevations on this pilot study of external beam radiation therapy and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) guided high dose rate (HDR) brachytherapy boost. Materials and methods Eleven patients with intermediate-risk and high-risk localized prostate cancer received MRI guided HDR brachytherapy (10.5 Gy each fraction) before and after a course of external beam radiotherapy (46 Gy). Two patients continued on hormones during follow-up and were censored for this analysis. Four patients discontinued hormone therapy after RT. Five patients did not receive hormones. PSA bounce is defined as a rise in PSA values with a subsequent fall below the nadir value or to below 20% of the maximum PSA level. Six previously published definitions of biochemical failure to distinguish true failure from were tested: definition 1, rise >0.2 ng/mL; definition 2, rise >0.4 ng/mL; definition 3, rise >35% of previous value; definition 4, ASTRO defined guidelines, definition 5 nadir + 2 ng/ml, and definition 6, nadir + 3 ng/ml. Results Median follow-up was 24 months (range 18–36 mo). During follow-up, the incidence of transient PSA elevation was: 55% for definition 1, 44% for definition 2, 55% for definition 3, 33% for definition 4, 11% for definition 5, and 11% for definition 6. Conclusion We observed a substantial incidence of transient elevations in PSA following combined external beam radiation and HDR brachytherapy for prostate cancer. Such elevations seem to be self-limited and should not trigger initiation of salvage therapies. No definition of failure was completely predictive.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Anurag K Singh
- Radiation Oncology Branch, National Cancer Institute, NIH-DHHS, Bldg 10, CRC Rm B2-3561, 9000 Rockville Pike, Bethesda, MD, 20892, USA
| | - Peter Guion
- Radiation Oncology Branch, National Cancer Institute, NIH-DHHS, Bldg 10, CRC Rm B2-3561, 9000 Rockville Pike, Bethesda, MD, 20892, USA
| | - Robert C Susil
- Radiation Oncology Branch, National Cancer Institute, NIH-DHHS, Bldg 10, CRC Rm B2-3561, 9000 Rockville Pike, Bethesda, MD, 20892, USA
| | - Deborah E Citrin
- Radiation Oncology Branch, National Cancer Institute, NIH-DHHS, Bldg 10, CRC Rm B2-3561, 9000 Rockville Pike, Bethesda, MD, 20892, USA
| | - Holly Ning
- Radiation Oncology Branch, National Cancer Institute, NIH-DHHS, Bldg 10, CRC Rm B2-3561, 9000 Rockville Pike, Bethesda, MD, 20892, USA
| | - Robert W Miller
- Radiation Oncology Branch, National Cancer Institute, NIH-DHHS, Bldg 10, CRC Rm B2-3561, 9000 Rockville Pike, Bethesda, MD, 20892, USA
| | - Karen Ullman
- Radiation Oncology Branch, National Cancer Institute, NIH-DHHS, Bldg 10, CRC Rm B2-3561, 9000 Rockville Pike, Bethesda, MD, 20892, USA
| | - Sharon Smith
- Radiation Oncology Branch, National Cancer Institute, NIH-DHHS, Bldg 10, CRC Rm B2-3561, 9000 Rockville Pike, Bethesda, MD, 20892, USA
| | - Nancy Sears Crouse
- Radiation Oncology Branch, National Cancer Institute, NIH-DHHS, Bldg 10, CRC Rm B2-3561, 9000 Rockville Pike, Bethesda, MD, 20892, USA
| | - Denise J Godette
- Radiation Oncology Branch, National Cancer Institute, NIH-DHHS, Bldg 10, CRC Rm B2-3561, 9000 Rockville Pike, Bethesda, MD, 20892, USA
| | - Bronwyn R Stall
- Radiation Oncology Branch, National Cancer Institute, NIH-DHHS, Bldg 10, CRC Rm B2-3561, 9000 Rockville Pike, Bethesda, MD, 20892, USA
| | - C Norman Coleman
- Radiation Oncology Branch, National Cancer Institute, NIH-DHHS, Bldg 10, CRC Rm B2-3561, 9000 Rockville Pike, Bethesda, MD, 20892, USA
| | - Kevin Camphausen
- Radiation Oncology Branch, National Cancer Institute, NIH-DHHS, Bldg 10, CRC Rm B2-3561, 9000 Rockville Pike, Bethesda, MD, 20892, USA
| | - Cynthia Ménard
- Radiation Medicine Program, Princess Margaret Hospital, University Health Network, University of Toronto, 5th Floor, 610 University Avenue Toronto, Ontario, M5G 2M9, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Syed AM, Puthawala A, Sharma A, Gamie S, Londrc A, Cherlow JM, Damore SJ, Nazmy N, Sheikh KM, Ko SJ. High-dose-rate brachytherapy in the treatment of carcinoma of the prostate. Cancer Control 2001; 8:511-21. [PMID: 11807421 DOI: 10.1177/107327480100800606] [Citation(s) in RCA: 31] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/16/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Although radical prostatectomy for localized disease is considered as a standard of care, external-beam radiotherapy and brachytherapy are equally effective. We report on the technique and preliminary results of high-dose-rate (HDR) brachytherapy using a temporary iridium-192 implant technique. METHODS The authors reviewed the literature on the techniques, treatment protocols, and results of HDR brachytherapy in the treatment of carcinoma of the prostate, and they report their own protocols, technique, and results. RESULTS The combination of HDR brachytherapy and external irradiation has been well tolerated by all 200 patients in our series, with less than 3% grade 3 late complications and with 95% PSA relapse-free survival with a median follow-up of 24 months. CONCLUSIONS HDR brachytherapy may be the most conformal type of irradiation in the treatment of carcinoma of the prostate regardless of tumor size, anatomical distortion, and organ mobility.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- A M Syed
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Long Beach Memorial Medical Center, 2801 Atlantic Avenue, Long Beach, CA 90806-1737, USA.
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|