Advances in head and neck reconstruction

Reconstructive flap surgery in head and neck cancer patients: an interdisciplinary view of the challenges encountered by radiation oncologists in postoperative radiotherapy

Background

Major advances have been made in reconstructive surgery in the last decades to reduce morbidity in head and neck cancer. Flaps are now present in 80% of patients with oral cavity cancer to cover anatomic, functional, and cosmetic needs. However, gaps in interdisciplinary innovation transfer from surgery to postoperative radiotherapy (poRT) remain challenging. We aimed to provide an interdisciplinary view of the challenges encountered by radiation oncologists in planning head and neck postoperative radiotherapy.

Methods

A systematic and critical review was conducted to address areas of optimization in surgery and radiology that may be relevant to poRT.

Results

Despite extensive surgical literature on flap techniques and salvage surgery, 13 retrospective series were identified, where flap outcomes were indirectly compared between surgery alone or poRT. These low-evidence studies suggest that radiotherapy accelerates flap atrophy, fibrosis, and osteoradionecrosis and deteriorates functional outcomes. Preliminary evidence suggests that tumor spread occurs at the flap-tissue junction rather than in the flaps. One prospective 15-patient study showed 31.3% vs. 39.2% flap volume reduction without or with poRT. In an international consensus, experts recognized the needs for optimized flap-sparing poRT against flap-related functional deterioration and bone damage. CT, MRI, and PET-CT modalities show potential for the delineation of the junction area between native tissues and flap for flap segmentation and to characterize flap-specific changes quantitatively and correlate them with patterns of relapse or complications.

Conclusion

Flap management in poRT is insufficiently documented, but poRT seems to damage flaps. Current gaps in knowledge underscore the need for prospective flap assessment and interdisciplinary trials investigating flap morbidity minimization by flap-sparing poRT planning.

Folded Radial Forearm Free Flap for the Reconstruction of Total Soft Palate Defects: Operative Technique

The surgical plan to reconstruct the palate must be carefully prepared given the morphological peculiarity of the soft palate forming both the roof of the mouth and the floor of the nasal cavity. This article focuses on the use of folded radial forearm free flaps to manage isolated defects of the soft palate in the absence of tonsillar pillar involvement.

Methods

Three patients affected by squamous cell carcinoma of the palate underwent resection of the soft palate and immediate reconstruction with a folded radial forearm free flap.

Results

All three patients showed good short-term morphological-functional outcomes as far as swallowing, breathing, and phonation were concerned.

Conclusions

The folded radial forearm free flap seems to be an efficacious way to manage localized defects of the soft palate, given the positive outcomes of the three patients treated, and in accordance with other authors. In general, the radial forearm free flap was confirmed to be a versatile solution for those intraoral defects of the soft tissue requiring a limited quantity of volume as in the case of the soft palate.

Airway management following head and neck microvascular reconstruction: is tracheostomy mandatory?

OBJECTIVES

Airway management following maxillofacial microvascular reconstruction is a fundamental part of the perioperative management. In oral cavity microvascular reconstruction, the airway is potentially compromised by airway edema, flap edema or bulkiness, hematoma formation, or upper airway sequelae from surgery. Classical teaching advocates elective tracheostomy in patients undergoing maxillofacial free flap reconstruction, while others keep patients intubated overnight (delayed extubation). The optimal method for perioperative airway management is still debated. This study aim was to evaluate the morbidity associated with elective tracheostomy in patients undergoing maxillofacial microvascular reconstruction and to recognize those patients who can avoid elective tracheostomy.

METHODS

Retrospective review of patients who underwent maxillofacial microvascular free flap reconstruction, between November 1^st 2010 and October 31^st 2019 in our center.

RESULTS

One-hundred and nine patients underwent microvascular reconstruction in the maxillofacial region. Sixty-one patients underwent an elective tracheostomy upon the primary surgery. Forty-eight patients were left intubated overnight. Seven patients underwent a late tracheostomy which was performed upon a neck re-exploration for postoperative complications, except for one patient which was due to failed extubation attempt. Patients who didn't receive an elective tracheostomy were younger and had a shorter duration of postoperative hospitalization. Seven patients suffered from tracheostomy- related complications, all of them underwent elective tracheostomy and none were from the late tracheostomy group.

CONCLUSIONS

Our results suggest, the routine use of elective tracheostomy in maxillofacial microvascular free flap reconstruction is unnecessary. Elective tracheostomy should be considered on case-to-case basis.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 4

International assessment of interobserver reproducibility of flap delineation in head and neck carcinoma

Background: Several reports have suggested that radiotherapy after reconstructive surgery for head and neck cancer (HNC), could have deleterious effects on the flaps with respect to functional outcomes. To predict and prevent toxicities, flap delineation should be accurate and reproducible. The objective of the present study was to evaluate the interobserver variability of frequent types of flaps used in HNC, based on the recent GORTEC atlas.Materials and methods: Each member of an international working group (WG) consisting of 14 experts delineated the flaps on a CT set from six patients. Each patient had one of the five most commonly used flaps in HNC: a regional pedicled pectoralis major myocutaneous flap, a local pedicled rotational soft tissue facial artery musculo-mucosal (FAMM) (2 patients), a fasciocutaneous radial forearm free flap, a soft tissue anterolateral thigh (ALT) free flap, or a fibular free flap. The WG's contours were compared to a reference contour, validated by a surgeon and a radiologist specializing in HNC. Contours were considered as reproducible if the median Dice Similarity Coefficient (DSC) was > 0.7.Results: The median volumes of the six flaps delineated by the WG were close to the reference contour value, with approximately 50 cc for the pectoral, fibula, and ALT flaps, 20 cc for the radial forearm, and up to 10 cc for the FAMM. The volumetric ratio was thus close to the optimal value of 100% for all flaps. The median DSC obtained by the WG compared to the reference for the pectoralis flap, the FAMM, the radial forearm flap, ALT flap, and the fibular flap were 0.82, 0.40, 0.76, 0.81, and 0.76, respectively.Conclusions: This study showed that the delineation of four main flaps used for HNC was reproducible. The delineation of the FAMM, however, requires close cooperation between radiologist, surgeon and radiation oncologist because of the poor visibility of this flap on CT and its small size.

Recommendations for postoperative radiotherapy in head & neck squamous cell carcinoma in the presence of flaps: A GORTEC internationally-reviewed HNCIG-endorsed consensus

INTRODUCTION

Head and neck reconstructive surgery using a flap is increasingly common. Best practices and outcomes for postoperative radiotherapy (poRT) with flaps have not been specified. We aimed to provide consensus recommendations to assist clinical decision-making highlighting areas of uncertainty in the presence of flaps.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

Radiation, medical, and surgical oncologists were assembled from GORTEC and internationally with the Head and Neck Cancer International Group (HNCIG). The consensus-building approach covered 59 topics across four domains: (1) identification of postoperative tissue changes on imaging for flap delineation, (2) understanding of tumor relapse risks and target volume definitions, (3) functional radiation-induced deterioration, (4) feasibility of flap avoidance.

RESULTS

Across the 4 domains, international consensus (median score ≥ 7/9) was achieved only for functional deterioration (73.3%); other consensus rates were 55.6% for poRT avoidance of flap structures, 41.2% for flap definition and 11.1% for tumor spread patterns. Radiation-induced flap fibrosis or atrophy and their functional impact was well recognized while flap necrosis was not, suggesting dose-volume adaptation for the former. Flap avoidance was recommended to minimize bone flap osteoradionecrosis but not soft-tissue toxicity. The need for identification (CT planning, fiducials, accurate operative report) and targeting of the junction area at risk between native tissues and flap was well recognized. Experts variably considered flaps as prone to tumor dissemination or not. Discrepancies in rating of 11 items among international reviewing participants are shown.

CONCLUSION

International GORTEC and HNCIG-endorsed recommendations were generated for the management of flaps in head and neck radiotherapy. Considerable knowledge gaps hinder further consensus, in particular with respect to tumor spread patterns.

Malignant tumors of the hard palate: Report of 4 cases and review of the literature

INTRODUCTION

Cancer of the hard palate is a fairly rare malignant tumor. Different histological types have been described in the hard palate, and that can affect its different structures. Diagnosis is based on biopsy with histological examination and possibly on immunohistochemical markers to confirm the diagnosis and exclude other diagnostic hypotheses. The aim of this study was to determine histopathologic, clinical and therapeutic characteristics of malignant tumors of the hard palate.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

A retrospective review of 4 patients who underwent Surgical resection by trans oral approach was performed for different histological types of malignant tumors of the hard palate. These included squamous cell carcinoma (case1 and case 2), mucosal melanoma (case 3), and adenocarcinoma (case 4).

RESULTS

The T stage was analyzed for all cases. Two cases were classified as T2 stage with a tumor size between 2 and 4 cm and the two others, given the extension to the maxillary and nasal cavity were classified as T4a. Cervical lymph node metastasis was found in three patients.

DISCUSSION

Surgical resection is the treatment of choice for malignant tumors of the hard palate. There is a variety of surgical procedures that can be used via a trans oral approach. Reconstruction of palatal defects with a prosthesis is sufficient, whereas larger defects will require a local, regional or even microvascular free tissue flap. The differences between these surgical techniques are presented, and indications are discussed.

CONCLUSION

The therapeutic management for malignant tumors of the hard palate is essentially surgical, with or without postoperative radiotherapy, discussed on a case-by-case basis. Survival rate depends on several factors, including early diagnosis, histological characteristic and appropriate management.

Failure of pedicled flap reconstruction in the head and neck area: A case report of a bilateral subclavian artery stenosis

INTRODUCTION

Pedicled flap reconstruction still plays an essential role in head and neck surgery as an alternative to free grafts. Two standard methods are the pectoralis major and the deltopectoral flap, which are generally characterized by their reliable perfusion. This case describes bilateral arteriosclerosis of the subclavian artery as a possible cause of flap failure.

PRESENTATION OF CASE

We report on a 65-year-old patient with a multilevel carcinoma of the right pharynx. Due to the unique patient history, a free flap reconstruction was not possible. After resection of the primary, we performed reconstruction with a pedicled pectoralis major flap.

DISCUSSION

Postoperatively, we observed necrosis of the pectoralis major flap. Secondary defect reconstructions were performed with a deltopectoral flap first from the right and then, in the case of necrosis, from the left side. Stenosing arteriosclerotic plaques of the subclavian artery on both sides were the cause of flap failure.

CONCLUSION

Preoperative angiography of the subclavian artery is not a standard diagnostic procedure in the surgical planning of pedicled flap reconstruction in the head and neck region. In exceptional cases, we recommend angiographic imaging of the supplying vessels to make a more precise flap selection and avoid complications.

Closed-suction compared with Penrose drainage after free flap reconstruction in the head and neck

Microsurgical free flaps are common in head and neck reconstruction, and their techniques and outcomes have continuously improved during the past decades. However, there are variations in practice among surgeons between the use of closed-suction drainage systems and Penrose drains. The proponents of Penrose drains propose that the negative pressure generated by the closed-suction drainage system may harm the microvascular anastomosis. We know of no previous studies that have compared the two drains for microvascular free flap reconstruction, so our aim was to compare them in a single-centre, retrospective review of all patients who had microvascular free flap reconstruction of the head and neck region in our department between 1 November 2010 and 1 September 2017. During this period 84 patients had 87 free flap reconstructions in the head and neck, 43 of which had Penrose, and 44 closed-suction, drainage. We compared the number of complications between the groups including haematomas, seromas, wound infections, anastomostic thrombosis, anastomotic revision, and need for re-exploration. There were no significant differences between the groups, despite a trend toward fewer negative explorations in the closed-suction group. There were no differences in complications between suction and passive drainage systems after microvascular free flaps, which suggests that closed suction drainage could be safely used after free flap reconstruction in the head and neck.

Health-Related Quality of Life following Reconstruction for Common Head and Neck Surgical Defects

BACKGROUND

Improved understanding and management of health-related quality of life represents one of the greatest unmet needs for patients with head and neck malignancies. The purpose of this study was to prospectively measure health-related quality of life associated with different anatomical (head and neck) surgical resections.

METHODS

A prospective analysis of health-related quality of life was performed in patients undergoing surgical resection with flap reconstruction for stage II or III head and neck malignancies. Patients completed the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Core Quality-of-Life Questionnaire-30 and the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Head and Neck Cancer Module-35 preoperatively, and at set postoperative time points. Scores were compared with a paired t test.

RESULTS

Seventy-five patients were analyzed. The proportion of the cohort not alive at 2 years was 53 percent. Physical, role, and social functioning scores at 3 months were significantly lower than preoperative values (p < 0.05). At 12 months postoperatively, none of the function or global quality-of-life scores differed from preoperative levels, whereas five of the symptom scales remained below baseline. At 1 year postoperatively, maxillectomy, partial glossectomy, and oral lining defects had better function and fewer symptoms than mandibulectomy, laryngectomy, and total glossectomy. From 6 to 12 months postoperatively, partial glossectomy and oral lining defects had greater global quality of life than laryngectomies (p < 0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

Postoperative health-related quality of life is associated with the anatomical location of the head and neck surgical resection. Preoperative teaching should be targeted for common ablative defects, with postoperative expectations adjusted appropriately. Because surgery negatively impacts health-related quality of life in the immediate postoperative period, the limited survivorship should be reviewed with patients.

CLINICAL QUESTION/LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Therapeutic, IV.

Refinements and restoring contour in head and neck reconstruction

BACKGROUND

To date head and neck reconstructions of oncological defects have concentrated on primarily filling the defect to achieve primary wound healing, secondly restore function and lastly cosmesis. This paper describes a refinement of existing free tissue transfer techniques for improvement of contour, function and aesthetics.

METHODS

A retrospective review of 38 patients operated on by one surgeon at St Vincent's, Royal Melbourne and Western Hospitals over a 3-year period was conducted. Data were collected on patient demographics, tumour details, nature of the defect, type of reconstructive procedure, nature of additional tissue used, radiotherapy, complications and outcome.

RESULTS

We present refinements in using de-epithelialized skin paddles, flexor hallucis longus, and rectus and vastus lateralis muscle in order to achieve optimal reconstruction. Free tissue transfer refinements are discussed in anterolateral thigh, fibula, rectus and anteromedial thigh free flaps. The average defect size and volume of neck dissection prior to reconstruction is presented. A variation of radical, modified radical and selective neck dissections were required for oncological staging and clearance. Rare and minor associated complications are discussed. Post-operative radiotherapy treatment was used in the majority of patients with preoperative adjuvant therapy required in some salvage cases. All patients achieved primary wound healing post-operatively with no salivary leaks, flap failures or exposure of neck vessels.

CONCLUSIONS

Supplementary microsurgical tissue transfer of de-epithelialized skin, vastus lateralis, flexor hallucis longus and rectus muscles is a valuable option for restoring contour, aesthetics and vessel protection post-radiotherapy.

Microsurgical free flaps: Controversies in maxillofacial reconstruction

Reconstructive microsurgery for oral and maxillofacial (OMF) defects is considered as a niche specialty and is performed regularly only in a handful of centers. Till recently the pectoralis major myocutaneous flap (PMMC) was considered to be the benchmark for OMF reconstruction. This philosophy is changing fast with rapid advancement in reconstructive microsurgery. Due to improvement in instrumentation and the development of finer techniques of flap harvesting we can positively state that microsurgery has come of age. Better techniques, microscopes and micro instruments enable us to do things previously unimaginable. Supramicrosurgery and ultrathin flaps are a testimony to this. Years of innovation in reconstructive microsurgery have given us a reasonably good number of very excellent flaps. Tremendous work has been put into producing some exceptionally brilliant research articles, sometimes contradicting each other. This has led to the need for clarity in some areas in this field. This article will review some controversies in reconstructive microsurgery and analyze some of the most common microvascular free flaps (MFF) used in OMF reconstruction. It aims to buttress the fact that three flaps-the radial forearm free flap (RFFF), anterolateral thigh flap (ALT) and fibula are the ones most expedient in the surgeon's arsenal, since they can cater to almost all sizeable defects we come across after ablative surgery in the OMF region. They can thus aptly be titled as the workhorses of OMF reconstruction with regard to free flaps.

Perioperative management of antithrombotic medication in head and neck reconstruction-a retrospective analysis of 137 patients

PURPOSE

Various protocols exist to prevent thrombosis after free flap surgery in the head and neck. This study reviews the outcome and incidence of perioperative complications in patients undergoing head and neck reconstruction, simply using subcutaneous low-molecular-weight heparin.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A total of 137 free tissue transfers performed between 2007 and 2010 were reviewed. All patients received a general thrombosis prophylaxis with subcutaneous low-molecular-weight enoxaparin. No aspirin, dextran, or additional antithrombotic medication was administered.

RESULTS

Overall flap survival was 97.1%. A total of 3 complete and 1 partial flap loss occurred, all due to venous thrombosis. Five cases of venous congestion were successfully revised.

CONCLUSION

The free flap survival rate using simple subcutaneous heparin seems to be equivalent to other management regimens. Therefore, we suggest that no additional antithrombotic treatment is needed for patients who undergo head and neck reconstruction with free tissue transfer.

[Oropharynx and hypopharynx reconstruction. What have we learnt?]

INTRODUCTION AND OBJECTIVES

Oropharyngeal and hypopharyngeal reconstructions require significant human and technical resources. This study analysed our reconstruction program over the last 13 years.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

Retrospective study in a tertiary reference centre.

RESULTS

Forty-three reconstruction procedures, of which 67.4 % (29/43) were microvascular (radial forearm 17, rectus abdominis 10, scapular 1, jejunum 1) and 42.6% (14/43) myocutaneous (pectoralis major 13, latissimus dorsi 1). Of these reconstructions, 83% (37/43) were for oropharyngeal defects and 17% (6/43) for hypopharyngeal defects, with 70% Stage iv (30/43), 26% Stage iii (11/43) and 4% (2/43) Stage ii. Mean Hospital stay was 54 days. Complications were present in 74.4% (32/43), salivary fistula being the most frequent (62.5%; 20/32). Ischemic necrosis was present in 20% (6/29) of the microvascular flaps. One microvascular flap was performed every 5.5 months, and one myocutaneous every 11.1 months. Previous radiotherapy and salvage surgery did not significantly increase the rate of complications.

CONCLUSIONS

Reconstruction of pharyngeal defects is a challenging and demanding task, one that is great when everything runs perfectly and disastrous when failure takes place, mainly for the patient. Disciplines related with head and neck reconstruction should create multidisciplinary teams to increase experience, particularly in centres where the number of patients available makes it difficult to get the expertise and confidence this surgery demands for accomplishing the objectives of patient satisfaction and functional restoration.

Periosteum-guided prefabrication of vascularized bone of clinical shape and volume

BACKGROUND

Large craniofacial skeletal defects require complex reconstruction. Vascularized tissue transfer is the current standard in treatment, but these operations are technically difficult and associated with donor-site morbidity. Guided flap prefabrication offers a technique for endogenously engineering vascularized composite tissues with complex three-dimensional structure. This study evaluates the relationship between implantation time and tissue structure for generating tissues of clinically relevant volume and structure.

METHODS

Twenty skeletally mature domestic sheep were implanted with poly(methyl methacrylate) chambers designed to mimic the size and shape of the mental protuberance of the mandible. Each chamber was filled with morcellized bone graft and implanted with the open face apposed to the cambium layer of the rib periosteum. Chambers were harvested at 3, 6, 9, 12, and 24 weeks, and the tissue inside the chambers was analyzed for shape conformation to chamber geometry, gross tissue volume, and bone histomorphometric parameters.

RESULTS

Histologically, active endochondral, direct, and appositional bone formation was observed. Calcified tissue area and new bone formation increased for each time point up to 12 weeks of implantation. The tissues formed maintained volumetric and geometrical structure consistent with the chamber up to 9 weeks after implantation. Significant decreases in total volume and agreement with chamber geometry were observed at 12 and 24 weeks.

CONCLUSIONS

Periosteum-guided tissue prefabrication was found to be an effective means of engineering three-dimensional vascularized bone of clinical size and shape. The optimal duration of incubation before significant volume loss occurs is 9 weeks in this large-animal model.

Radical ablative surgery and radial forearm free flap (RFFF) reconstruction for patients with oral or oropharyngeal cancer: postoperative outcomes and oncologic and functional results

CONCLUSIONS

Radical ablative surgery and radial forearm free flap (RFFF) reconstruction provide promising oncologic and functional results in patients with oral or oropharyngeal cancer.

OBJECTIVES

To assess the postoperative outcomes and the oncologic and functional results, with their main predictive factors, after radical ablative surgery and RFFF reconstruction for patients with oral or oropharyngeal cancer.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Between 2000 and 2006, we prospectively analyzed the postoperative, oncologic and functional outcomes of all previously untreated patients who underwent this type of surgery.

RESULTS

A total of 132 patients were enrolled in this study. There were three RFFF failures. The rate of surgical complications was 20%. The 5-year locoregional control and overall survival rates were 68% and 52%, respectively. Advanced age, high comorbidity index, elevated overall stage and tumoral involvement of the inner part of the cheek were correlated with a lower overall survival rate. A good functional result was obtained for oral diet, speech, mouth opening and aesthetic outcome in 87%, 80%, 86% and 88% of the patients, respectively. High comorbidity index, large flap surface, radiotherapy and tumoral involvement of the mobile tongue were significant predictors of poorer functional or aesthetic outcomes.

Head and neck reconstruction with free flaps: a report on 213 cases

The aim of this retrospective study is to review the experience of our institution in performing microvascular head and neck reconstruction between 2000 and 2004. During this period, 213 free flaps, including 146 radial forearm free flaps, 60 fibular flaps and 7 scapular flaps, were performed. Free flap success rate and complications were reported. The pre-treatment factors influencing these results were subsequently analyzed. Functional and aesthetic outcomes were evaluated by the same clinician. There were 14 free flap failures, giving an overall free flap success rate of 93.4%. Salvage surgery for recurrent cancer was the only factor correlated with a higher risk of free flap failure (P = 0.0004). The local complication rate was 20.9%. High level of comorbidity (P = 0.009), salvage surgery for recurrent cancer (P = 0.03) and hypopharyngeal surgery (P = 0.002) were associated with a higher risk of local complications. An unrestricted oral diet and an intelligible speech were recovered by respectively 76 and 88% of the patients. Microvascular free flaps represent an essential and reliable technique for head neck reconstruction and allow satisfactory functional results.

Tissue engineering in head and neck reconstructive surgery: what type of tissue do we need?

Craniofacial tissue loss due to congenital defects, disease or injury is a major clinical problem. The head and neck region is composed of several tissues. The most prevalent method of reconstruction is autologous grafting. Often, there is insufficient host tissue for adequate repair of the defect side, and extensive donor site morbidity may result from the secondary surgical procedure. The field of tissue engineering has the potential to create functional replacements for damaged or pathologic tissues.