The effect of oral antiplatelet agents on tissue plasminogen activator-mediated thrombolysis in a rabbit model of thromboembolic stroke

Amelioration of Cerebral Ischemic Injury by a Synthetic Seco-nucleoside LMT497

Recently, we reported that the A3 adenosine receptor (A3AR) agonist LJ529 (2-chloro-N(6)-(3-iodobnzyl)-5'-N-methylcarbamoyl-4'-thioadenosine) reduces cerebral ischemic injury via inhibition of recruitment of peripheral inflammatory cells into ischemic brain lesion. A3AR agonists, however, are known to possess anti-platelet activity, which may deter the combination therapy with tissue plasminogen activator for the therapy of cerebral ischemic stroke. Thus, the present study investigates the neuroprotective/anti-ischemic effect of a synthetic seco-nucleoside, LMT497 ((S)-2-((R)-1-(2-chloro-6-(3-iodobenzylamino)-9H-purin-9-yl)-2-hydroxyethoxy)-3-hydroxy-N-methylpropanamide) with little anti-platelet activity. LMT497 neither showed A3AR binding activity nor anti-platelet activity. In our present study LMT497 significantly attenuated the injury/death of cortical neurons exposed to oxygen-glucose deprivation (OGD) followed by re-oxygenation (R). LMT497 significantly reduced the ascending cellular level of reactive oxygen species under ischemic conditions by increasing the superoxide dismutase (SOD) levels. LMT497 also inhibited the migration of microglia which mediates inflammatory responses in ischemia. In rats subjected to middle cerebral artery occlusion (MCAO, 1.5 h) followed by reperfusion, LMT497 largely reduced brain infarction volume, and edema, and improved neurological score. Therapeutic efficacy of LMT497 was obtained by twice treatments even at 10 h and 18 h after the onset of ischemia. Collectively, LMT497 could be a therapeutic drug candidate with a wide therapeutic time window for the treatment of cerebral ischemic stroke.

Antiplatelet Therapy Prasugrel: A Novel Platelet ADP P2Y12 Receptor Antagonist

Novel adenosine diphosphate (ADP) P2Y12 antagonists, including prasugrel, ticagrelor, cangrelor and elinogrel, are in various phases of clinical development. These ADP P2Y12 antagonists have advantages over clopidogrel ranging from faster onset to greater and less variable inhibition of platelet function. Novel ADP P2Y12 antagonists are under investigation to determine whether their use can result in improved antiplatelet activity, faster onset of action, and/or greater antithrombotic effects than clopidogrel, without an unacceptable increase in hemorrhagic or other side effects. Prasugrel (CS-747; LY-640315), a novel third-generation oral thienopyridine, is a specific, irreversible antagonist of the platelet ADP P2Y12 receptor. Preclinical and early phase clinical studies have shown prasugrel to be characterized by more potent antiplatelet effects, lower interindividual variability in platelet response, and faster onset of activity compared to clopidogrel. Recent findings from large-scale phase III testing showed prasugrel to be more efficacious in preventing ischemic events in patients with acute coronary syndrome (ACS) undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI); however, this is achieved at the expense of an increased risk of bleeding. Prasugrel provides more rapid and consistent platelet inhibition than clopidogrel.

Antiplatelet therapies: drug interactions in the management of vascular disorders

Antiplatelet drugs represent a key class of drugs that are of proven value in arterial thromboembolic disorders. There is a need for effective, safe antiplatelet agents or their combinations to provide predictable therapeutic benefit, dosage flexibility, and unique pharmacologic profiles, such as rapid onset in acute thrombotic states, as well as sustained antiplatelet effects in chronic platelet-activating states (e.g., post-stent placement). Aspirin, clopidogrel, or their combination have shown improved clinical outcomes in certain unique settings, and the search for additional antiplatelet agents is ongoing. Current studies suggest that combination antiplatelet therapy with existing agents is best considered a use-adapted strategy, with the greatest clinical benefit of combination therapy realized in acute, platelet-activating, and prothrombotic states.

Effect of clopidogrel on tissue-plasminogen activator-induced in vitro thrombolysis of feline whole blood thrombi

OBJECTIVE

To determine if clopidogrel enhanced the thrombolytic rate of tissue-plasminogen activator (t-PA) on an in vitro feline whole blood thrombosis model.

ANIMALS

9 purpose-bred cats.

PROCEDURE

Blood obtained from cats before (baseline) and after treatment with clopidogrel (75 mg, p.o., q 24 h for 3 days) was anticoagulated with sodium citrate (9:1 volume-to-volume ratio) to which 1 microCi of I125-fibrinogen was added. Thrombi were formed by the addition of calcium chloride and bovine thrombin. Thrombi were placed into autologous plasma to which 0.1 mg of t-PA was added. Plasma samples were collected at different time points to determine the amount of released I125-fibrin split products. Thrombolytic rates were calculated by determining the time to 25%, 50%, and 75% thrombolysis (t25, t50, and t75, respectively). Confidence intervals for t25, t50, and t75 at baseline were compared with those after treatment.

RESULTS

There were no significant differences in thrombolytic rates between values obtained at baseline and after clopidogrel treatment (t25, 18.0 vs 18.5 minutes; t50, 63.3 vs 65.6 minutes; and t75, 163.0 vs 170.1 minutes, respectively).

CONCLUSIONS AND CLINICAL RELEVANCE

Clopidogrel did not have an effect on the rate of thrombolysis of feline whole blood thrombi induced by t-PA in this in vitro model.

Combining antiplatelet and thrombolytic therapies for stroke

Pharmacological therapy for acute nonhaemorrhagic stroke has become a reality over the last 5 years. Mechanistically, both thrombolytic (tissue plasminogen activator and urokinase) and antiplatelet (aspirin) monotherapy have demonstrated efficacy. However, unintended actions limit the extent of clinical improvement in each circumstance. For example, in addition to excess bleeding, tissue plasminogen activator therapy has been associated with complement activation, neuronal toxicity and laminin degradation, while aspirin may reduce nitric oxide synthase activity and cerebral blood flow. Attention is now directed toward improving the therapeutic index for each class of agents. Generally, while thrombolytic therapy is focused on developing agents with greater fibrin specificity and safety (that is, a reduction in intracranial haemorrhage rate), the development of antiplatelet agents is primarily focused on achieving greater potency. The latter is being investigated by combining agents with different mechanisms (aspirin and dipyridamole, aspirin and clopidogrel) as well as agents designed to block the glycoprotein IIb/IIIa receptor, the final common pathway for platelet aggregation. Thus, combination therapy using both thrombolytic and antiplatelet agents will further attempt to improve the therapeutic index by increasing potency and improving the safety profile. Anecdotal case studies support the merits of this approach and are consistent with the data reported for myocardial ischaemia and interventional strategies. It is anticipated that drug therapy directed at both thrombolytic and antiplatelet targets will ultimately result in a widened therapeutic window that will allow acute stroke therapy to be administrated to a much greater number of patients than is currently possible.

The effect of vasodilators on aspirin-induced antagonism of t-PA thrombolysis

Although i.v. t-PA has proven successful in reducing neurologic deficits in acute ischemic stroke, the disadvantages of a narrow therapeutic time window and the failure of thrombolysis in more than 50% of patients treated have necessitated an examination of adjuvant therapies to improve the rate of thrombolysis. Experimentally, the combination of aspirin therapy with t-PA has resulted in a paradoxical antagonism of thrombolysis. Reversal of this antagonism with nitric oxide (NO) donors suggested that aspirin may inhibit/ antagonize NO-related mechanisms. Using this rabbit model of thromboembolic stroke, this hypothesis is now expanded to compare two clinically relevant anti-hypertensive agents, atenolol (NO-dependent) and hydralazine (NO-independent), for their ability to improve t-PA-mediated clot lysis following aspirin pre-treatment. Thirty rabbits (10 per group) were pre-treated with aspirin (20mg kg(-1), i.v.) and then randomized to receive either vehicle, atenolol (20 microg kg(-1) h(-1), i.v.) or hydralazine (10 microg kg(-1) min(-1), i.v.) beginning 30 min following autologous clot embolization. All rabbits then received t-PA (6.3 mg kg(-1), i.v.) beginning 1 h after embolization, with completion of the protocol 4 h after embolization. Aspirin therapy reduced regional cerebral blood flow (rCBF) from 82.8m +/- 4.7 to 62.5 +/- 6.6 (n = 30; p = 0.0005). In the aspirin control group only 30% (3 of 10) rabbits demonstrated complete clot lysis, whereas the combined atenolol (60%) and hydralazine (70%) groups experienced a clot lysis rate of 65% (13 of 20 rabbits), similar to clot lysis rates previously observed with t-PA alone. In a separate series of experiments, all agents able to reverse aspirin antagonism of thrombolysis demonstrated an improvement in rCBF, suggesting a common mechanism for this diverse group of agents in reversing aspirin's antagonism of thrombolysis.

Thrombolytics: drug interactions of clinical significance

Thrombolytic agents activate plasminogen and induce a systemic fibrinolytic and anticoagulant state. Interaction of fibrinolysis with coagulation and platelet aggregation might be important for synergistic interactions with other antiplatelet or anticoagulant drugs. Thrombolytic agents are most often used in patients with coexisting cardiovascular medication, including various antihypertensives, beta-blocking agents, nitrates and aspirin (acetylsalicylic acid). In acute coronary syndromes, anticoagulants and antiplatelet compounds such as clopidogrel or glycoprotein IIb/IIIa receptor antagonists might be given. Inducers or inhibitors of the cytochrome P450 system are not reported to affect the pharmacokinetics of any thrombolytic agent. Since the elimination of the recombinant plasminogen activators saruplase and alteplase is dependent on liver blood flow, drugs affecting hepatic blood flow could theoretically affect the hepatic clearance of these agents. In fact, a reduction in thrombolytic activity has only been demonstrated for alteplase with nitroglycerin (glyceryl trinitrate). Pharmacodynamic interactions occur more often. The additive and beneficial effect of aspirin as concomitant therapy to thrombolysis has been demonstrated without excessive bleeding rates. No data are available on the interaction between ticlopidine or clopidogrel and thrombolytic agents in humans. Anticoagulation by heparin concomitantly with thrombolysis improves the patency rate of the occluded coronary vessel, but bleeding complications are seen more frequently. Although there has been no controlled study on the interaction between oral anticoagulants and thrombolytic agents, patients with myocardial infarction who were taking an oral anticoagulant before admission seem to be at higher risk for intracranial haemorrhage during thrombolytic therapy. Currently, no recommendations can be given for possible dose adjustment of thrombolytic therapy in patients receiving antiplatelet comedication. For comedication with heparin, it has been advised to monitor activated partial thromboplastin time frequently and to avoid values >2.5-fold normal. Patients receiving thrombolytic treatment should be monitored frequently for bleeding and the physician should be aware of any comedication exerting antiplatelet (e.g. aspirin, clopidogrel and ticlopidine) or anticoagulant (e.g. warfarin) effects.

Evaluating the efficacy of citicoline in embolic ischemic stroke in rats: neuroprotective effects when used alone or in combination with urokinase

The combination of thrombolysis with neuroprotection, because of different mechanisms, would be expected to show better results when used after onset of focal ischemia. In this study we report our experience with the neuronal protective effects of citicoline alone and in combination with urokinase in a model of focal ischemia. Both medications were injected 2 h after onset of a focal occlusion of the middle cerebral artery (MCA) in rats. Focal ischemia was produced with embolization of a clot into the origin of the MCA. This produces a large infarction involving the cortex and the basal ganglia. Animals were observed for neuronal deficts at 2 and 24 h after surgery and were sacrificed 72 h after onset of ischemia. Saline-treated animals showed a large infarction involving the cerebral cortex and basal ganglion in most animals (volume 33.1 +/- 9.7%). Animals treated with citicoline alone were divided in two groups. The first group of animals were treated with a single injection (300 mg/kg, ip) of the medication 2 h after the arterial occlusion. The second group was treated with the active medication intermittently (3 x 300 mg/kg, ip) over a 72-h period. There was a significant decrease in the neuronal damage in the cortex in the animals treated with citicoline (single dose, 20.9 +/- 9.7%, P = 0.01; intermittent injection, 18.9 +/- 11.4%, P < 0.008). The last experiment evaluated the usefulness of the combination of citicoline with intraarterial urokinase. The combination showed significantly more protection than with urokinase or citicoline alone (volume 13.6 +/- 9.1%, P < 0.001). We conclude from our experiments that citicoline may offer significant neuronal protection that may be further enhanced with the addition of a thrombolytic agent.

Stroke: antithrombin versus antiplatelet therapy

The success of thrombolytic therapy for acute stroke has demonstrated that neurologic outcome can be improved with timely treatment. However, the severely restricted use of thrombolytics has reinforced the need to develop alternative and complementary therapies. Antithrombin and antiplatelet agents represent promising therapeutic approaches for stroke management. Antiplatelet therapy has modestly improved outcome in both acute stroke (aspirin) and in secondary stroke prevention (aspirin with or without dipyridamole; adenosine receptor antagonists), although bleeding and other adverse events associated with antithrombin therapy have largely negated their potential benefit. These findings have prompted innovative solutions to the pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic challenges that are crucial to advancing these strategies for acute, primary and secondary stroke therapy. Currently, inhibitors of the platelet surface glycoprotein IIb/IIIa (GP IIb/IIIa, fibrinogen) receptor are being examined in clinical trials while antithrombin therapies focus on thrombin antagonists and inhibitors as well as inhibitors of Factor Xa. Further advances in stroke treatment will include combination therapies. Additionally, the successful design of future drug therapies will result from a more complete understanding of the activity of these agents not only on platelet function and the coagulation cascade, but also for their effects on the endothelium and within the brain parenchyma. The sum of these activities will allow for the maintenance of cerebral blood flow, blood-brain barrier integrity and neuronal function.

Antiplatelet therapy in acute cerebral ischemia

BACKGROUND

Improved recognition of stroke signs and symptoms has paralleled the development of pharmacological strategies that may be examined to reduce stroke mortality and morbidity. Presently, tissue plasminogen activator is the only therapy that significantly improves outcome in acute stroke, with no agent demonstrating a significant reduction in mortality.

SUMMARY OF REVIEW

Antiplatelet agents are a heterogenous class of drugs that have been successfully used for more than 2 decades in secondary stroke prevention. These agents include aspirin, with or without dipyridamole, and more recently, the adenosine antagonists ticlopidine and clopidogrel. However, studies of the use of antiplatelet agents within 48 hours of the ictus have examined only aspirin. Only 1 study, the Multicentre Acute Stroke Trial-Italy (MAST-I), entered patients within 6 hours of the ictus. These data suggest that an improvement in mortality may be related to the speed of administration. No significant adverse events were noted with early antiplatelet monotherapy. However, MAST-I did note a significant increase in early mortality in patients receiving aspirin plus streptokinase, a finding not adequately explained by an increase in the intracranial hemorrhage rate.

CONCLUSIONS

The use of antiplatelet therapy in acute stroke, clinical or experimental, has only recently received attention. It is likely that the use of antiplatelet agents for acute stroke therapy will be less restrictive than that currently seen for thrombolytics. Future studies should include an examination of those agents that have previously demonstrated efficacy in secondary stroke prevention, most notably, aspirin. The recognition that all platelet stimuli share a final common pathway that is dependent on the surface glycoprotein IIb/IIIa (fibrinogen) receptor has resulted in the development of various agents which block this receptor and are currently the focus for clinical trials. The role of nitric oxide in stroke therapy will depend on minimizing the hypotensive side effects of this agent. Stroke models are needed to provide preliminary data on the efficacy of antiplatelet therapy, especially as relates to the interaction of antiplatelet agents with thrombolytics.

Aspirin use and incident stroke in the cardiovascular health study. CHS Collaborative Research Group

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE

Randomized clinical trials testing aspirin in relatively low-risk, middle-aged people have consistently shown small increases in stroke associated with aspirin use. We analyzed the relationship between the regular use of aspirin and incident ischemic and hemorrhagic stroke among people aged 65 years or older participating in the Cardiovascular Health Study.

METHODS

We conducted a multivariate analysis of incident stroke rates in a prospectively assessed, observational cohort of 5011 elderly people followed for a mean of 4.2 years.

RESULTS

Participants had a mean age of 72 years, and 58% were women. Twenty-three percent used aspirin frequently, and 17% used aspirin infrequently at study entry. Frequent aspirin use was associated with an increased rate of ischemic stroke compared with nonusers (relative risk= 1.6; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.2 to 2.2; P=0.001). After adjustment for other stroke risk factors, women who used aspirin frequently or infrequently at study entry had a 1.8-fold (95% CI, 1.2 to 2.8) and 1.6-fold (95% CI, 0.9 to 3.0) increased risk of ischemic stroke, respectively (P<0.01, test for trend), compared with nonusers. In men, aspirin use was not statistically significantly associated with stroke risk. Findings were similar when aspirin use in the years before the incident stroke was used in the modeling. Aspirin use at entry was also associated with a 4-fold (95% CI, 1.6 to 10.0) increase in risk of hemorrhagic stroke for both infrequent and frequent users of aspirin (P=0.003).

CONCLUSIONS

Aspirin use was associated with increased risks of ischemic stroke in women and hemorrhagic stroke overall in this elderly cohort, after adjustment for other stroke predictors. The possibility exists of confounding by reasons for aspirin use rather than cause and effect. Whether regular aspirin use increases stroke risk for elderly people without cardiovascular disease can only be determined by randomized clinical trials.

Nitric oxide reverses aspirin antagonism of t-PA thrombolysis in a rabbit model of thromboembolic stroke

Randomized trials of thrombolytic therapy in stroke have reported an improvement in neurologic outcome; however, the addition of aspirin has resulted in a significant increase in mortality and antagonism of clot lysis in clinical and animal studies, respectively. This finding is in contradistinction to the known synergy in mortality reduction for aspirin and thrombolytics in myocardial infarction. It is hypothesized that aspirin antagonism of clot lysis is related to inhibition of nitric oxide (NO) and may be reversed by providing a source of NO. Twenty rabbits were treated with aspirin (20 mg/kg, i.v.) prior to internal carotid clot embolization. One-half hour following embolization, rabbits were randomized to receive vehicle (n = 5), the NO precursor L-arginine (300 mg/kg, i.v. bolus at 0.5 and 2.5 h postembolus; n = 5), or a nitric oxide donor (nitroprusside, 1 mg/kg/h, i.a., or nitroglycerin, 10 microg/kg/min, i.v., n = 5 each agent). Tissue plasminogen activator (t-PA) (6.3 mg/kg) was administered from 1 to 3 h after embolization. Lysis of the tin-tagged clot was followed with serial X rays and gross examination. No rabbit in the control group experienced complete clot lysis. However, 2 of 5 rabbits in the L-arginine group and 6 of 10 rabbits in the nitric oxide donor (nitroprusside and nitroglycerin) groups noted complete clot lysis (P < 0.05, Fisher exact test). Thus, administration of an NO donor (nitroglycerin or nitroprusside) and, to a lesser extent L-arginine, reversed aspirin's antagonism of t-PA thrombolysis. This study may help explain the discrepant results seen with aspirin and thrombolytics.