Hemihypoglossal nerve transfer in brachial plexus repair: technique and results

Direct Hemi-Hypoglossal Nerve and Hypoglossal Nerve for Suprascapular Nerve/Proximal Brachial Plexus Neurotization: A Cadaveric Feasibility Study

Introduction Partial restoration of shoulder function is important in upper brachial plexus lesions, and the suprascapular nerve is often the target for such neurotization procedures. Although there is an extensive history of peripheral nerve surgeons using the hypoglossal nerve for various local nerve transfers, some have reported using this nerve as a donor for upper brachial plexus grafting procedures. We discuss our anatomical findings for the use of a direct hypoglossal to suprascapular nerve transfer. Materials and methods Fifteen adult cadavers (30 separate sides) were dissected to reveal the hypoglossal nerve in the neck and the supraclavicular brachial plexus in the supraclavicular region. On 15 sides, the hypoglossal nerve was dissected anteriorly to the midline, cut, and transposed toward the supraclavicular region in half of the dissections. On the remaining sides, the nerve was hemisected longitudinally into two equal parts, and the cut inferior portion also swung inferiorly toward the supraclavicular region. The cut end of the hypoglossal nerve was brought toward the proximal suprascapular nerve, the fifth (C5) and sixth (C6) cervical nerve roots, and the upper trunk. Measurements included the length and diameter of the cervical portion of the hypoglossal nerve and the diameter of the suprascapular nerve. Results The mean diameter and length of the hypoglossal nerve were 2.1 millimeters (mm) and 72.8 mm, respectively. The mean diameter of the proximal suprascapular nerve was 2.7 mm. Successful, tension-free transposition to the C5 and C6 nerve roots was achieved on all sides. The average extra length of the hypoglossal nerve for a C5 root transposition was 8 mm and 5.2mm for a C6 root transposition. The distal hypoglossal nerve reached the upper trunk on all but two sides (6.7%). The distal hypoglossal nerve reached the proximal suprascapular nerve on all but four sides (13.3%). Of the 87% of sides (n=26) where the hypoglossal nerve reached the proximal suprascapular nerve, 58% of these (n=15) required some manipulation of the suprascapular nerve from its origin at the upper trunk. This technique resulted in a mean additional length to the suprascapular nerve of 35 mm. No differences were found between the completely cut hypoglossal nerves and hemisected nerves in regard to working length. Conclusions To our knowledge, the use of the hypoglossal nerve as a transpositional graft for direct suprascapular nerve neurotization has not been previously described. Based on our study, we propose that the hypoglossal nerve, or hemi-hypoglossal nerve, should be considered as a donor nerve to restore suprascapular nerve function in the majority of patients. Additionally, the hypoglossal nerve may be transferred to the C5 and C6 roots and upper trunk of the brachial plexus for direct neurotization.

Clinical applications of end-to-side neurorrhaphy: an update

End-to-side neurorrhaphy constitutes an interesting option to regain nerve function after damage in selected cases, in which conventional techniques are not feasible. In the last twenty years, many experimental and clinical studies have been conducted in order to understand the biological mechanisms and to test the effectiveness of this technique, with contrasting results. In this updated review, we consider the state of the art about end-to-side coaptation, focusing on all the current clinical applications, such as sensory and mixed nerve repair, treatment of facial palsy, and brachial plexus injuries and painful neuromas management.

The medial cord to musculocutaneous (MCMc) nerve transfer: a new method to reanimate elbow flexion after C5-C6-C7-(C8) avulsive injuries of the brachial plexus--technique and results

The aim of this paper is to report on our ample experience with the medial cord to musculocutaneous (MCMc) nerve transfer. The MCMc technique is a new type of neurotization which is able to reanimate the elbow flexion in multilevel avulsive injuries of the brachial plexus provided that at least the T1 root is intact. A series of 180 consecutive patients, divided into four classes according to the quality of hand function, is available for a long-term follow-up after brachial plexus surgery. The patients enrolled for the study have in common a brachial plexus palsy showing multiple cervical root avulsive injuries at two (C5-C6), three (C5-C6-C7) and four (C5-C6-C7-C8) levels. The reinnervation of the musculocutaneous nerve is obtained via an end-to-end transfer from two donor fascicles located in the medial cord. The selected fascicles are those directed principally to the flexor carpi radialis, ulnaris and, to a lesser degree, the flexor digitorum profundus. Under normal anatomic conditions, they are located in the medial cord, and their site corresponds to the inverted V-shaped bifurcation between the internal contribution of the median nerve and the ulnar nerve. The technique has no failure and no complications when the hand shows a normal wrist and finger flexion and a normal intrinsic function. In case of suboptimal conditions of the hand, the technique has proved technically more challenging, but still with 67% satisfactory results. In the four-root avulsive injuries, however, this method shows its limitations and an alternative strategy should be preferred when possible. EMG analysis shows a reinnervation in both the biceps and the brachialis muscles, explaining the high quality of the observed results. Moreover, this technique theoretically offers the possibility of a "second attempt" at a more distal level in case of failure of the first surgery. This procedure is quick, safe, extremely effective and easily feasible by an experienced plexus surgeon. The ideal candidate is a patient harbouring a C5-C6 avulsive injury of the upper brachial plexus with a normally functioning hand.

Platysma motor branch transfer in brachial plexus repair: report of the first case

Background

Nerve transfers are commonly employed in the treatment of brachial plexus injuries. We report the use of a new donor for transfer, the platysma motor branch.

Methods

A patient with complete avulsion of the brachial plexus and phrenic nerve paralysis had the suprascapular nerve neurotized by the accessory nerve, half of the hypoglossal nerve transferred to the musculocutaneous nerve, and the platysma motor branch connected to the medial pectoral nerve.

Results

The diameter of both the platysma motor branch and the medial pectoral nerve was around 2 mm. Eight years after surgery, the patient recovered 45° of abduction. Elbow flexion and shoulder adduction were rated as M4, according to the BMC. There was no deficit after the use of the above-mentioned nerves for transfer. Volitional control was acquired for independent function of elbow flexion and shoulder adduction.

Conclusion

The use of the platysma motor branch seems promising. This nerve is expendable; its section led to no deficits, and the relearning of motor control was not complicated. Further anatomical and clinical studies would help to clarify and confirm the usefulness of the platysma motor branch as a donor for nerve transfer.

Nerve transfers for severe brachial plexus injuries: a review

Nerve transfer procedures are increasingly performed for repair of severe brachial plexus injury (BPI), in which the proximal spinal nerve roots have been avulsed from the spinal cord. The procedure essentially involves the coaption of a proximal foreign nerve to the distal denervated nerve to reinnervate the latter by the donated axons. Cortical plasticity appears to play an important physiological role in the functional recovery of the reinnervated muscles. The author describes the general principles governing the successful use of nerve transfers. One major goal of this literature review is to provide a comprehensive survey on the numerous intra- and extraplexal nerves that have been used in transfer procedures to repair the brachial plexus. Thus, an emphasis on clinical outcomes is provided throughout. The second major goal is to discuss the role of candidate nerves for transfers in the surgical management of the common severe brachial plexus problems encountered clinically. It is hoped that this review will provide the treating surgeon with an updated list, indications, and expected outcomes involving nerve transfer operations for severe BPIs.