Time to complete mixing for the measurement of glomerular filtration rate from single bolus plasma 51Cr-EDTA clearance

Estimating Analytical Errors of Glomerular Filtration Rate Measurement

BACKGROUND

Few studies are available on how to optimize time points for sampling and how to estimate effects of analytical uncertainty when glomerular filtration rate (GFR) is calculated.

METHODS

We explored the underlying regression mathematics of how analytical variation of a kidney filtration marker affects 1-compartment, slope-and-intercept GFR calculations, using 2 or 3 time points following a bolus injection, and used this to examine the results from 731 routine 3-point iohexol plasma clearance measurements.

RESULTS

GFR calculations inflated analytical uncertainty if the time points were taken too late after the bolus injection and too close after each other. The uncertainty in GFR calculation was, however, the same as the analytical uncertainty if optimal time points were used. The middle of the 3 samples was of little value. The first sample should be taken as early as possible after the distribution phase. Sampling before the patient specific half-life of the kidney filtration marker resulted in an exponential error inflation whereas no error inflation was seen when sampling occurred later than 2 half-lives. Theoretical GFR uncertainty could be lowered 2.6-fold if individually optimized time points for sampling had been used in our 731 clearance measurements. Using Taylor expansions to approximate the moments of transformed random variables, the uncertainty of an individual GFR measurement could be calculated in a simple enough way to be applicable by laboratory software.

CONCLUSIONS

We provide a theoretical foundation to select patient-optimal time points that may both limit errors and allow calculation of GFR uncertainty.

Investigating current practices in renal function measurement and carboplatin dosing in children with cancer - a UK perspective

Renal function-based carboplatin dosing is a well-accepted practice in pediatric oncology. However, the accuracy of this approach is only as precise as the method of kidney function measurement, most commonly involving determination of glomerular filtration rate (GFR). Recent work by the Children's Oncology Group has raised concerns over nuclear medicine-based methodologies used to calculate GFR across US clinical centers. Current practices of GFR measurement, methods used to calculate carboplatin dosage and the utility of therapeutic drug monitoring were investigated in 21 UK primary pediatric oncology treatment centers through a questionnaire-based study. Information obtained was compared to results previously published in 2008 following a similar survey. In relation to GFR measurement, the main changes observed were a shift toward a greater number of samples being taken following tracer administration and an increase in number of centers using the Brochner-Mortensen correction factor. In relation to the use of renal function assessment data to inform dosing, EDTA elimination half-life in conjunction with body weight was used to calculate carboplatin dose in 18/21 (86%) centers, with uncorrected GFR and body weight utilized in 9/21 (43%) centers. A total of 14/21 (67%) centers utilize therapeutic drug monitoring approaches to carboplatin treatment in defined patient groups including neonates and infants. Results suggest that while GFR measurement across UK centers is relatively consistent, some uncertainties remain. In addition, for patient sub-populations where there are concerns over the potential for marked inter-patient variability in carboplatin exposures, adaptive dosing approaches are now well established.