Use of synthetic mesh for the entire abdominal wall after TRAM flap transfer

A DIEP Dive into Patient Risk Factors for Hernia and Bulge Development: A Meta-regression

BACKGROUND

 This meta-regression aims to investigate risk factors for abdominal hernia and bulge in patients undergoing deep inferior epigastric perforator (DIEP) flaps and the effect of prophylactic mesh placement on postoperative complications.

METHODS

 A systematic search was conducted in July of 2022 in alignment with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses guidelines. Seventy-four studies published between 2000 and 2022 met the inclusion criteria. Sixty-four studies were included in the analysis for bulge and 71 studies were included in the analysis for hernia. Meta-regressions were run on the proportion of patients experiencing hernia or bulge to assess for patient risk factors and the role of prophylactic mesh placement. Proportions were transformed using the Freeman-Tukey double arcsine method.

RESULTS

 The average rates of hernia and bulge after DIEP flaps were found to be 0.18% and 1.26%, respectively. Increased age (β = 0.0059, p = 0.0117), prior abdominal surgery (β = 0.0008, p = 0.046), and pregnancy history (β = -0.0015, p = 0.0001) were significantly associated with hernia. Active smoking (β = 0.0032, p = 0.0262) and pregnancy history (β = 0.0019, p < 0.0001) were significantly associated with bulge. Neither the perforator vessel laterality nor the number of perforator vessels harvested had any association with hernia or bulge. Prophylactic mesh placement was not associated with hernia or bulge.

CONCLUSION

 Understanding the comorbidities associated with hernia or bulge following DIEP flap breast reconstruction, such as advanced age, prior abdominal surgery, pregnancy history, and active smoking status, allows surgeons to proactively identify and educate high-risk patients. Future studies may further explore whether prophylactic mesh placement offers patients any benefit.

Postoperative Abdominal Bulge and Hernia Rates in Patients Undergoing Abdominally Based Autologous Breast Reconstruction: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

ABSTRACT

Bulge and hernia may occur after abdominally based breast reconstruction. The purpose of this study is to provide an estimate of the effects that the type of flap used for breast reconstruction (ie, transverse rectus abdominis muscle [TRAM] vs muscle-sparing [MS]-2 TRAM vs DIEP) has on the postoperative development of both abdominal bulge and abdominal hernia, taking into consideration the method of donor site closure (ie, with mesh vs without mesh), based on the available literature. Twenty-eight studies met the inclusion criteria and were included in the systematic review. From these, 9 studies were comparative and suitable for meta-analysis. The results showed that, for unilateral breast reconstructions, there was no statistically significant difference in hernia/bulge rates in the following techniques: MS-2 TRAM flap without mesh, MS-2 TRAM flap with mesh, and DIEP flap without mesh, and they showed significantly lower hernia/bulge rates compared with TRAM flap without mesh, and TRAM flap with mesh, whereas for bilateral reconstructions, there was no statistically significant difference in hernia/bulge rates in the following techniques: MS-2 TRAM flaps with mesh and DIEP flaps without mesh, and they showed significantly lower hernia/bulge rates compared with TRAM flaps without mesh, TRAM flaps with mesh, and MS-2 TRAM flaps without mesh.

Experimental Investigation on the Tissue Response Induced by Face-Lifting Mesh Suspension Thread in Rats

Background

Face-lifting procedures are often performed to hide the effects of aging. Thread-lifting, a minimally invasive technique for the correction of facial aging, has become increasingly popular, and various materials for the procedure have been developed.

Objective

This study compared tissue responses to two types of threading sutures placed under rat skin: polypropylene (PP) monofilament mesh suspension thread (a novel face-lifting material) and polydioxanone (PDO) barbed thread.

Methods

Eight rats each were assigned to the PP monofilament mesh suspension, PDO barbed thread, and control groups. Tissue reactions were evaluated 28 days after subcutaneous loading of the materials.

Results

Significant increases in tensile strength and the mean area occupied by collagen fibers were evident in skin loaded with PDO barbed thread and PP monofilament mesh suspension thread compared to control skin (p<0.05). Compared to sites loaded with PDO barbed thread, those loaded with PP monofilament mesh suspension thread showed a significant increase in the number of collagen fibers and a lower grade of inflammation (p<0.05).

Conclusion

PP monofilament mesh suspension thread has skin-rejuvenating effects comparable to those of PDO barbed thread, but induces a less severe inflammatory response. This indicates that it is a safe and effective material for use in thread-lifting procedures on aging skin.

Gelfoam Interposition Minimizes Risk of Fistula and Postoperative Bleeding in Modified-Furlow Palatoplasty

Failure to accomplish a tension-free, watertight closure predisposes the palatoplasty patient to fistula formation. Perioperative bleeding also places the patient at risk for adverse airway events (AAE). This study introduces the incorporation of a hemostatic gelatin sponge (Gelfoam) into layered palatoplasty to minimize adverse postoperative bleeding and fistula formation. A retrospective chart review was performed to identify subjects who underwent Furlow palatoplasty with insertion of Gelfoam from 2010 to 2015. Exclusion criteria include age >3 years, prior palate surgery, <30-day follow-up, immunosuppressive state, and diagnosis of Treacher-Collins or Apert Syndrome. Demographic data include age, sex, cleft laterality, prior surgeries, Veau classification, Pierre Robin status, and tracheostomy dependence. Primary outcome was fistula formation. Secondary outcomes included perioperative metrics and AAE.One hundred subjects met criteria, 45% female. Average age was 14.6 months. Subjects with syndromes comprised 28%, with 16% diagnosed with Pierre Robin. Two subjects were tracheostomy-dependent. Prior cleft and mandibular procedures were performed in 55%. Isolated palatal defects were seen in 46%, unilateral lip and palate in 41%, and bilateral lip and palate in 13%. The majority of defects were Veau II and III (35% and 34%, respectively). Adverse airway events occurred in 2%, one of which resulted in reintubation. One subject (1%) was found to have a postoperative fistula.The incorporation of Gelfoam in the modified-Furlow palatoplasty results in a low rate of oronasal fistula (1%) and low perioperative risk of AAE. Further prospective comparison of this method to others will be the focus of future work.

A Multicenter Noncomparative Clinical Study on Midface Rejuvenation Using a Nonabsorbable Polypropylene Mesh: Evaluation of Efficacy and Safety

Background

Facial rejuvenation can be achieved using a variety of techniques. Since minimally invasive procedures for face lifting have become popular because of their convenience and short operating time, numerous minimally invasive surgical procedures have been developed. In this study, a nonabsorbable polypropylene mesh is introduced as a new face lifting instrument, with the nasolabial fold as the main target area. In this paper, we report the efficacy and safety of a polypropylene mesh in midface rejuvenation.

Methods

Thirty-three subjects with moderate-to-severe nasolabial folds were enrolled from two medical institutions for a noncomparative single-sample study. A mesh was inserted above the superficial muscular aponeurotic system layer, reaching the nasolabial folds through a temporal scalp incision. After 3 weeks, the temporal end of the mesh was pulled to provide a lifting effect. Then, the mesh was fixed to the deep temporal fascia using nonabsorbable sutures. To evaluate efficacy, we compared the scores on the Wrinkle Severity Rating Scale and a visual analog scale for patient satisfaction between the baseline and 7 weeks postoperatively. In addition, we evaluated safety based on the incidence of adverse events.

Results

The treatment was deemed effective at improving wrinkles in 23 of 28 cases, and patient satisfaction improved significantly during the study period. There were seven cases of skin or subcutaneous tissue complications, including edema and erythema, but there were no suspected serious adverse events.

Conclusions

Face lifting using a nonabsorbable mesh can improve nasolabial folds without serious adverse effects. Thus, this technique is safe and effective for midface rejuvenation.

Technique for Minimizing Donor-site Morbidity after Pedicled TRAM-Flap Breast Reconstruction: Outcomes by a Single Surgeon's Experience

Background:

Breast reconstruction with pedicled transverse rectus abdominis myocutaneous (TRAM) flap can result in significant abdominal wall donor-site morbidity. We present our technique of transversely dividing the anterior fascia and rectus abdominis combined with reinforcement above the arcuate line for closure of the anterior abdominal wall defect to prevent contour deformities performed by a single senior surgeon and compare these results with those of our prior series.

Methods:

We described our new technique of closure of the abdominal wall defect and retrospectively performed the comparison between the results of pedicled TRAM flaps using the new closure technique and those of 420 pedicled TRAM flaps from our 2003 publication in terms of abdominal bulging and hernia.

Results:

Sixty-seven pedicled TRAM flaps in 65 patients were compared with 420 pedicled TRAM flaps of the 2003 series. The new technique was associated with 5 partial TRAM flap necroses (8%). There was no total flap loss with the new technique. The median follow-up period was 13 months (range, 4–36 months). There were no instances of abdominal hernia and bulge during follow-up in the new series. Compared with the previous 2003 series, the new technique was superior in terms of occurrence of abdominal wall hernia or bulging.

Conclusions:

We are still performing pedicled TRAM flap for autologous breast reconstruction. Using the technique of transversely dividing the anterior fascia and rectus abdominis combined with reinforcement above the arcuate line can reduce the occurrence of abdominal bulging and hernia.

Does the use of an acellular dermal graft in abdominal closure after rectus flap harvest impact the occurrence of post-operative hernia?

IMPORTANCE

Patients with rectus free flap harvest extending below the arcuate line are predisposed to postoperative hernia formation. As such, many authors have advocated the use of closure adjuncts to increase the integrity of the closure and prevent hernia or abdominal wall bulging.

SETTING

Busy level 1 public trauma center in metropolitan Fort Worth, Texas

INTERVENTIONS

Following harvest of the rectus free flap, 48 patients underwent primary closure; 24 of these patients had defects extending below the arcuate line. Forty patients were closed with an acellular dermal graft; 22 of these patients had defects extending below the arcuate line.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE

Postoperative hernia formation and local infection rate were examined in a minimum follow-up period of 1 year.

RESULTS

Regardless of closure method, no hernias were observed in the postoperative period. Using an unpaired t test and an alpha value of 0.05, there was no statistically significant difference in the infection rate between the two groups.

CONCLUSION

Following rectus abdominis myocutaneous free flap harvest, the use of an acellular dermal graft in abdominal wall closure may not be of any further advantage in the prevention of hernia.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Retrospective (Level III).

Cholecystectomy after breast reconstruction with a pedicled autologous tram flap. Types of surgical access

The number of breast reconstruction procedures has been increasing in recent years. One of the suggested treatment methods is breast reconstruction with a pedicled skin and muscle TRAM flap (transverse rectus abdominis muscle – TRAM). Surgical incisions performed during a cholecystectomy procedure may be located in the areas significant for flap survival. The aim of this paper is to present anatomical changes in abdominal walls secondary to pedicled skin and muscle (TRAM) flap breast reconstruction, which influence the planned access in cholecystectomy procedures. The authors present 2 cases of cholecystectomy performed due to cholelithiasis in female patients with a history of TRAM flap breast reconstruction procedures. The first patient underwent a traditional method of surgery 14 days after the reconstruction due to acute cholecystitis. The second patient underwent a laparoscopy due to cholelithiasis 7 years after the TRAM procedure. In both cases an abdominal ultrasound scan was performed prior to the operation, and surgical access was determined following consultation with a plastic surgeon. The patient who had undergone traditional cholecystectomy developed an infection of the postoperative wound. The wound was treated with antibiotics, vacuum therapy and skin grafting. After 7 weeks complete postoperative wound healing and correct healing of the TRAM flap were achieved. The patient who had undergone laparoscopy was discharged home on the second postoperative day without any complications. In order to plan a safe surgical access, it is necessary to know the changes in the anatomy of abdominal walls following a pedicled TRAM flap breast reconstruction procedure.

The management of abdominal contour defects following TRAM flap breast reconstruction

BACKGROUND

Incisional hernia can develop following breast reconstruction with abdominal tissue regardless of technique, and the management is often challenging.

OBJECTIVES

The authors characterize hernias following transverse rectus abdominis musculocutaneous (TRAM) flap procedures and evaluate outcomes of different strategies for repair.

METHODS

All patients who underwent repair of a TRAM-related hernia or bulge between 2003 and 2011 at a single institution were retrospectively reviewed. A minimum of 2 years' follow-up was required for inclusion in this series. Outcomes of different techniques for repair were compared and risk factors for hernia recurrence identified.

RESULTS

Forty-three patients underwent repair of a TRAM-related hernia or bulge, most often with mesh (74.4%, n=32). At a mean overall follow-up of 5.2 years, 9 patients (20.9%) developed recurrent hernia or bulge. Compared to primary suture closure, the use of mesh was protective against recurrence (odds ratio, 0.05; 95% confidence interval, 0.00-0.65; P=.02), with the best results observed with fascial closure and underlay mesh reinforcement.

CONCLUSIONS

Incisional hernia following TRAM flap breast reconstruction can be a challenging problem. Attention to surgical technique and the use of mesh minimize the risk of recurrence.

Reconstruction of Complex Abdominal Wall Defects

INTRODUCTION

Reconstruction of large abdominal wall defects not amenable to primary closure remains a challenging problem. These defects result from trauma, previous surgery, infection and tumour resection. The primary objectives of abdominal wall reconstructions are to protect abdominal contents and provide functional support. The abdominal wall reconstruction aims at providing basic component parts, i.e. skin, soft tissue and fascia. For large soft tissue defects, pedicled or free flap closure can be used. In clean wounds, fascial replacement is accomplished with synthetic mesh provided there is adequate soft tissue coverage.

METHODS

We treated a total of 20 consecutive patients with complex abdominal wall defects utilizing various reconstructive procedures. There were 15 males (75%) and 5 females (25%). The aetiology included dehiscence of laparotomy wounds in eight (40%), following ablative surgery for malignant tumours in seven (35%), trauma in three (15%) and congenital defects in two (10%) cases. The reconstructive procedures consisted of onlay prolene mesh in seven (35%), Gore-Tex (PTFE) dual mesh both as inlay and onlay in five (25%), facial partition release technique in three (15%), inlay prolene mesh covered with omentum and split skin graft in two (10%), inlay prolene mesh covered with expanded skin in two (10%), and Gore-Tex dual mesh covered with latissimus dorsi myocutaneous flap in one (5%) case. Postoperatively none developed mesh infection or extrusion. Three patients with malignant aetiology received postoperative radiotherapy. During follow up, one patient developed ventral hernia cephalad to the repair and one died due to recurrence of abdominal wall malignancy.

CONCLUSION

The reconstruction of an abdominal wall defect requires a comprehensive plan of preoperative and post operative care of the patient and aims toward restoration of abdominal structural integrity by a variety of procedures. The use of new biomaterials and tissue expanders provides reliable and durable abdominal wall closure along with good aesthetic results.

Double-mesh technique for correction of abdominal hernia following mammary reconstruction carried out with bipedicled TRAM flap and the primary closing of the donor area by using a single polypropylene mesh

BACKGROUND

Mammary reconstruction by using the transverse myocutaneous flap of the abdominal straight muscle (TRAM) is still an option well accepted in many parts of the world. However, bipedicled TRAM flaps are associated with greater morbidity of the abdominal donor area. The aim of this study was to describe an efficient technique for correcting the delayed defects of the abdominal wall following mammary reconstruction carried out with bipedicled TRAM flaps by using two polypropylene prostheses overlapped in different anatomical planes.

METHODS

At Hospital Estadual Sumaré at Universidade Estadual de Campinas, 18 women who underwent unilateral mammary reconstruction with bipedicled TRAM flaps and immediate fixation of two rectangular flaps of polypropylene mesh on the donor area were assessed. Later on, three patients (16.7%) presented with deformity of the anterolateral abdominal wall in the donor area. Each of these herniations was corrected by fixing two polypropylene meshes in different anatomical planes: the first mesh, which was bigger and preperitoneal, was fixed from the costal borders until the pubis; the second mesh was fixed from the external oblique muscle to the contralateral external oblique muscle, remaking the median line.

RESULTS

All patients were followed up for at least 18 months, without any signs of relapse, abdominal asymmetry, or chronic pain and with satisfactory functional results.

CONCLUSION

The correction of delayed deformities of the abdominal wall after mammary reconstruction with bipedicled TRAM flaps using double mesh was carried out in an effective and secure way, providing an interesting surgical option for mastologists and plastic and general surgeons.

Biomechanical analysis of sutures used for mesh fixation in the donor area after removal of the rectus abdominis muscle

BACKGROUND

The use of synthetic mesh for abdominal wall closure after removal of the rectus abdominis is established but not standardised. This study compares two forms of mesh fixation: a simple suture, which fixes the mesh to the edges of the defect on the anterior rectus abdominis fascia; and total fixation, which incorporates the fasciae of the internal oblique, external oblique and transverse muscles in the suture, anchoring the mesh in the position of the removed muscle.

METHOD

A total of 16 fresh cadavers were dissected. Two sutures were compared: simple and total. Three different sites were analysed: 5 cm above, 5 cm below and at the level of the umbilicus. The two sutures compared were tested in each region using a standardised technique. All sutures were performed with nylon 0, perpendicular to the linea alba. Each suture was secured to a dynamometer, which was pulled perpendicularly towards the midline until the rupture of the aponeurosis. 'Rupture resistance' was measured in kilogram force. The mean among the groups was compared using the paired Student's t-test to a significance level of 1% (p<0.01).

RESULTS

The mean rupture resistance of the total suture was 160% higher than that of the simple suture.

CONCLUSION

The total suture includes the external oblique, internal oblique and transverse fasciae, which are multi-directional, and creates a much higher resistance when compared with the simple suture. Total suture may reduce the incidence of bulging and hernias of the abdominal wall after harvesting the rectus abdominis muscle, but comparative clinical studies are necessary.

Factors associated with hernia and bulge formation at the donor site of the pedicled TRAM flap

The purpose of this study was to evaluate the correlation between risk factors and hernia or bulge formation at the donor site of the transverse rectus abdominis myocutaneous (TRAM) flap. A retrospective study was conducted between September 2005 and December 2008 in 206 patients who underwent breast reconstruction with pedicled TRAM flap. Eight (3.9%) of these patients had abdominal wall hernia and 26 (12.6%) had abdominal bulging. The incidence of hernia was significantly higher (P < 0.05) among patients with body mass index (BMI) >/= 30 kg/m(2) (hernia incidence, 15.0%) than that among patients with BMI <30 kg/m(2) (hernia incidence, 3.2%), while the incidence of abdominal bulge was significantly lower (P < 0.05) among patients with BMI >/= 30 kg/m(2) (abdominal bulge incidence, 5.0%) than that among patients with BMI >/= 30 kg/m(2) (abdominal bulge incidence, 19.1%). Therefore, obesity was identified as a risk factor for abdominal wall hernia. It was also found that the use of mesh to reinforce the abdominal wall significantly reduced (P < 0.025) the incidence of hernia (use of mesh (hernia incidence, 2.5%) versus non-mesh (hernia incidence, 5.9%)) and abdominal bulge (use of mesh (abdominal bulge incidence, 9.9%) versus non-mesh (abdominal bulge incidence, 17.3%)) among the patients.

Extended mesh repair with external oblique muscle reinforcement for abdominal wall contour abnormalities following TRAM flap

Many patients undergoing reconstructive surgery after mastectomy opt for reconstruction with the transverse rectus abdominis myocutaneous (TRAM) flap. Among the morbidities related to TRAM flap reconstruction is the development of abdominal wall contour abnormalities, including bulges or hernias. Several repair techniques at the flap abdominal wall donor site have been described for use at the time of flap harvest in an attempt to reduce the risk of such abdominal wall complications. For patients that develop abdominal wall contour abnormalities, numerous reconstructive options have been reported, with mixed results. Ten patients were identified as having abdominal wall contour abnormalities after a TRAM flap and underwent an extended mesh repair with external oblique muscle reinforcement. The mesh was secured to the bony landmarks of the lower abdomen and the abdominal wall fascia. All patients achieved complete resolution of abdominal wall bulging. In the follow-up period, no recurrences, infections, or seromas were noted. One patient, who failed an earlier repair at the inferior abdominal wall, reported symptoms consistent with a scar neuroma. Symptoms were treated successfully with gabapentin and a nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drug. We propose a novel and reliable method of lower abdominal wall reconstruction for patients with post-TRAM flap abdominal wall contour abnormalities. This technique incorporates the use of a large Marlex mesh reinforced with bilateral external oblique muscle flaps. We report a series of 10 patients who have achieved resolution of their symptoms and have regained a natural, flat-appearing abdominal wall contour.

The "limited rectus sheath incisions" technique for DIEP flaps using preoperative CT angiography

The abdominal wall donor site has become popularized for autologous breast reconstruction, with low donor site morbidity one of its key attributes. Further improvements in donor site outcomes have been facilitated through muscle sparing techniques, such as the use of the deep inferior epigastric artery (DIEA) perforator (DIEP) flap, and the use of modifications to closing the rectus sheath following muscular dissection, such as the use of endoscopic techniques and the use of mesh. We describe a new and unique method for potentially minimizing donor site damage during DIEP flap harvest: the "limited rectus sheath incisions" technique. This approach is only possible in select cases, the choice of which can be aided with the use of preoperative computed tomography angiography (CTA). In select patients, there may be an extended segment of DIEA that does not give any musculocutaneous perforators, and thus does not require open exposure. In such cases, limited incision to the rectus sheath may be made: one to access the periumbilical perforators and a separate incision to access the pedicle near its origin on the external iliac artery. This incision may then be made in a muscle-splitting fashion, in the line of external oblique fibers. This approach may reduce damage to the anterior rectus sheath, and may contribute to improving donor site morbidity. (c) 2009 Wiley-Liss, Inc. Microsurgery, 2009.

Use of the anterior rectus sheath for abdominal wall reconstruction: a study in cadavers

Our aim was to evaluate the amount of tension present after incision and undermining of the anterior rectus sheaths and the external oblique muscles in 20 fresh adult cadavers. Resistance to traction of the anterior and posterior rectus sheaths towards the midline was measured at three stages of dissection: before any aponeurotic undermining; after incision and undermining of the anterior rectus sheaths; and after incision and undermining of the external oblique muscles associated with the previous dissection. Significance of differences was assessed using non-parametric tests. There was a significant reduction in tension in the anterior and posterior sheaths on both levels after each stage of dissection. The incision and undermining of the anterior rectus sheaths and the external oblique muscles promoted a progressive reduction in tension at the aponeurotic edges of the abdominal wall.

Laparoscopic mesh repair of transverse rectus abdominus muscle and deep inferior epigastric flap harvest site hernias

INTRODUCTION

The transverse rectus abdominus muscle (TRAM) flap is one of the treatment options for breast reconstruction. TRAM flap reconstruction donor site herniation rates range from 1% to 8.8%. Traditionally, these hernias were treated by an open primary repair with or without the addition of onlay mesh. We report laparoscopic approach to treat TRAM and deep inferior epigastric perforator flap (DIEP) harvest site hernias with mesh.

CASES

We treated 5 patients, 4 from TRAM and 1 from DIEP flap harvest site hernias during the period of October 2003 to January 2006. Two of these patients underwent previous open mesh repair with recurrence. All of these patients underwent laparoscopic hernia repair using polytetrafluoroethylene dual mesh. Follow-up ranged 6 to 31 months without any recurrences.

CONCLUSIONS

Laparoscopic mesh repair of ventral hernias located at TRAM and DIEP flap harvest sites can be performed safely and with a low rate of recurrence.

The Efficacy of Bilateral Lower Abdominal Free Flaps for Unilateral Breast Reconstruction

BACKGROUND

In large-breasted women, those with midline abdominal scars, or those with scant abdominal tissue, a unipedicled lower abdominal flap may be insufficient for breast reconstruction. In these circumstances, bipedicled flaps may best satisfy the reconstructive requirements, but outcomes with bilateral free flaps for unilateral breast reconstruction are generally lacking.

METHODS

A retrospective review of patients in whom two vascular pedicles/flaps were used to simultaneously reconstruct a single breast was used to assess operative outcomes.

RESULTS

Forty patients (80 flaps) for whom two free tissue transfers were used to simultaneously reconstruct a single breast were identified. The majority of patients had a native breast cup size of C or larger. The flaps used included the superficial inferior epigastric artery (SIEA) flap (n = 29; 36 percent), the transverse rectus abdominis musculocutaneous (TRAM) flap (n = 9; 11 percent), the muscle-sparing TRAM flap (n = 15; 19 percent), and the deep inferior epigastric perforator (DIEP) flap (n = 27; 34 percent). Flaps were paired in a variety of configurations, most commonly using a muscle-sparing TRAM flap in conjunction with a DIEP flap or an SIEA flap. Recipient vessels included a combination of the internal mammary and thoracodorsal vessels and the pedicles of combined flaps (turbocharged). There were no flap losses. Two flaps required reexploration for microsurgical anastomotic revision, and both were successfully salvaged. Isolated fat necrosis was encountered in only three of 80 flaps.

CONCLUSIONS

This study suggests that bilateral, bipedicled, abdominal free flaps for unilateral breast reconstruction can be used safely with a high degree of success. These combined flaps provide for enhanced vascular perfusion of the lower abdominal flap territory, allowing for harvest of larger volumes of tissue for reconstruction.

Revision in Autologous Breast Reconstruction: Principles and Approach

As breast reconstruction has an aesthetic endpoint, secondary surgical intervention is an integral part of this process. This article examines revision in autologous breast reconstruction from the perspective of clinical priority. The authors examine challenges they may be faced in autologous breast reconstructions and suggest surgical approaches toward their resolution.

[Abdominal hernias resulting from abdominal flap harvest]

The anatomic characteristics of the anterior abdominal wall allow the harvesting of various types of flaps, some of them with considerable volume. These flaps are used mainly for reconstruction of the female breast, thoracic wall, and perineal or ilioinguinal region. Even though general donor site morbidity is low, hernias and "bulging" can occur due to the harvest of muscle and fascia, which leads to a weakening of the abdominal wall. Hernias and bulging appear mostly after harvest of classic flap types, which include removal of the rectus abdominis muscle. Further refinements of these flaps, i.e. microvascular flaps, in particular perforator flaps, lead to a marked reduction in donor site morbidity. In the following overview, the problem of abdominal wall weakening as a result of flap harvest is discussed and possible therapeutic options are elucidated.

Use of Regenerative Human Acellular Tissue (AlloDerm) to Reconstruct the Abdominal Wall following Pedicle TRAM Flap Breast Reconstruction Surgery

BACKGROUND

Harvest of transverse rectus abdominis musculocutaneous (TRAM) flaps for breast reconstruction leaves a variable defect in the anterior rectus fascia. Inadequate closure of the defect could lead to the development of hernia or abdominal wall bulging. Various techniques have been developed to reduce the incidence of hernia and abdominal wall bulging. The authors describe a novel technique of using a regenerative human acellular matrix (AlloDerm) as a fascial substitute in closing the defect.

METHODS

Fifty-four consecutive patients who opted for pedicle TRAM flap procedures for breast reconstruction postmastectomy were scheduled for donor-site repair with the use of AlloDerm. AlloDerm was placed interpositionally as an inlay graft to mimic the anterior rectus fascia.

RESULTS

Hernia or infection did not develop in any of the patients. There was a greater incidence of seroma and bulging among the first 18 patients, with eight seromas (44.4 percent) and six bulges (33.3 percent). When the technique was ameliorated in the next 36 patients, there was a reduction in the incidence of seromas (16.7 percent, p = 0.03) and bulges (16.7 percent, p = 0.17). Of the three patients who experienced wound dehiscence, partial AlloDerm exposure occurred in two, but was resolved without further consequences. Biopsy specimens of AlloDerm, obtained 12 and 14 months after TRAM donor-site repair, showed full tissue integration. The cell density, vasculature, and collagen orientation in the biopsies were consistent with abdominal fascia tissue.

CONCLUSION

Based on these results, the authors recommend the use of AlloDerm as an alternative option for abdominal fascia closure after TRAM flap harvest for breast reconstruction.

Laparoscopic Repair for Recurrent Abdominal Wall Hernia After TRAM Flap Breast Reconstruction

BACKGROUND

The transverse rectus abdominis musculocutaneous (TRAM) flap is an appealing option for women choosing between various breast reconstructive techniques as it results in an autologous reconstructed breast that is soft and mimics a natural breast. Despite these benefits, there are complications with this procedure, such as pain at the donor site, longer scars, and most frequently the occurrence of abdominal wall hernia or bulge, which has been reported in up to 20%-40% of patients.

METHODS

In this case report, we share our experience with 2 patients who had multiple open hernia repairs, 5 between the 2 of them, after their TRAM flap surgery. Each of these 5 repairs was performed with a Prolene mesh overlay, but not one lasted for more than 6 months. After reviewing our patients' records and our surgical options, we decided to proceed with laparoscopic repair of their recurrent hernias.

RESULTS

The patients are now at postoperative follow-up of 12 months and 15 months, with no evidence of recurrence.

DISCUSSION

Laparoscopic surgery has many benefits, such as shorter hospitalization and decreased pain. For our patients, it also resulted in a more beneficial and longer-lasting repair. We believe that this is partly due to the mechanics of the repair, which allows the abdominal contents to buttress the mesh against the abdominal wall. In addition, we believe that this technique reinforces the posterior sheath, which may not be accomplished in an open repair. This is important as most hernias after TRAM flap surgery occur below the arcuate line. From our experience with these 2 patients, we now advocate the use of laparoscopic repair as a treatment option for those who present with recurrent abdominal wall hernia or bulge after their TRAM flap surgery and believe with more experience it will become a first-line treatment.

Mesh assisted direct closure of bilateral TRAM flap donor sites

The pedicled transverse rectus abdominis myocutaneous (TRAM) flap remains a popular choice for patients requesting breast reconstruction. Criticism of all techniques that harvest the rectus abdominis muscle centre on abdominal wall weakness.[Dulin WA, Avila RA, Verheyden CN, Grossman L. Evaluation of abdominal wall strength after TRAM flap surgery. Plast Reconstr Surg 2004; 113: 1662-1665] Primary fascial closure of the donor site has been shown to reduce abdominal wall weakness and the subsequent risk of hernia and bulge. [Mizgala CL, Hartrampf CR Jr, Bennett GK. Abdominal function after pedicled TRAM flap surgery. Clin Plast Surg 1994; 21: 255-272]2 Primary fascial closure of all uni-lateral and most bilateral muscle preserving TRAM flap donor sites is possible. In a series of 23 bilateral TRAM flaps, excessive abdominal tension prevented direct fascial closure of the donor site in seven. Using a technique that includes muscle preservation, muscle relaxation and mesh assistance; tensionfree, direct fascial closure was achieved in all. The mesh buttress supports the rectus sheath during closure and provides long term shape and stability.

Mesh lift: a new procedure for long-lasting results in brow lift surgery

BACKGROUND

Prevention of recurrent eyebrow ptosis is the greatest challenge in brow lift surgery today. In this article, the author describes a new surgical procedure to provide long-lasting results in brow lift surgery.

METHODS

Over 7 years, this new technique was used in 37 patients. Except for four, all patients were women aged 22 to 57 years. In this procedure, a polypropylene mesh strap is used as a suspender to maintain the elevated position of the eyebrow. The mesh suspender is placed in a subgaleal tunnel that is created between a limited temporal scalp incision and a classic upper blepharoplasty incision. The distal end of the mesh is sutured to the undersurface of the upper orbital part of the orbicularis oculi muscle, and the proximal end is fixed to the periosteum at the temporal region after a desired eyebrow position is obtained by traction of the mesh suspender superolaterally.

RESULTS

The polypropylene mesh was tolerated well in all patients. No complication related to foreign body reaction was encountered. During 6 months to 4 years of follow-up, none of the patients experienced recurrent eyebrow ptosis. The long-term results revealed a long-lasting, almost permanent eyebrow elevation in all patients.

CONCLUSIONS

This new technique seems to be useful in prevention of recurrent eyebrow ptosis following brow lift surgery. The author suggests that, after its integration with reoperative tissue, the mesh suspender becomes an artificial suspensory aponeurosis that provides stable fixation to maintain the elevated position of the eyebrow. This is considered to be the main reason for the excellent long-lasting results obtained in the current clinical study.

Closure of Abdominal Wall Defects Using Acellular Dermal Matrix

BACKGROUND

After some abdominal surgical procedures, the abdominal wall defect may be too large for closure by tension-free approximation of the wound margins because of tissue loss or swelling of the abdominal viscera. A variety of absorbable and nonabsorbable prosthetic materials have been used for emergency abdominal wall reconstruction. Of these materials, polytetrafluoroethylene (PTFE) sheets have proved to be the most efficacious.

METHODS

This study compared the efficacy of allogenic acellular dermal matrix (ADM) and PTFE as prosthetic materials for wound closure in rats with surgical, full-thickness, 2 x 3-cm abdominal wounds. Healing was studied among animals with and those without experimentally induced peritonitis for 21 days after surgery.

RESULTS

Acellular dermal matrix became vascularized and incorporated into the wound bed and was partially or fully epithelialized without the need for skin grafting. As a result, little superficial bleeding was seen, and ADM effectively closed the wounds even in the presence of peritonitis. Wounds treated with ADM also showed a significant reduction in wound area (sterile:p < 0.001; contaminated:p < 0.05). In contrast, PTFE temporarily closed the wounds, but was not incorporated into them. It consequently evoked the formation of extensive underlying granulation tissue that showed significant superficial bleeding when the PTFE was removed. Very limited wound contraction occurred in PTFE-treated wounds, and some instances of evisceration and fistula formation were observed. Wounds treated with both types of material showed significant amounts of adhesion to visceral organs underlying the wound site.

CONCLUSIONS

Acellular dermal matrix exhibits a number of favorable features relative to PTFE for closing sterile or contaminated full-thickness abdominal wall defects.

Small intestinal submucosa in abdominal wall repair after TRAM flap harvesting in a rat model

The strength of porcine small intestinal submucosa in abdominal wall repair after transverse rectus abdominis myocutaneous flap harvesting was examined in a rat model. Changes in the levels of selected molecular markers of inflammation after small intestinal submucosa implantation were also studied. Eighty-three rats were divided into three groups. In experimental group I, an abdominal wall defect created by removal of the rectus abdominis muscle was repaired with placement of a 1.5 x 5-cm2 patch of small intestinal submucosa. In experimental group II, the muscle defect was repaired with a combination of small intestinal submucosa patch placement and fascial closure. In the control group, the defect was repaired with direct fascial closure. At postoperative times of 3 days, 2 weeks, 1 month, and 2 months, the muscle tissues adjacent to the abdominal wall repair site were subjected to biopsies for assessment of inflammation markers. Full-thickness sections of the abdominal wall from the repair site in each animal were removed for tensile strength testing and histological examinations. The results demonstrated that interleukin-6 and interferon-gamma levels were increased in the two experimental, small intestinal submucosa-treated groups at 3 days and 2 weeks postoperatively. The results of mechanical testing demonstrated that the average tensile strength of the repaired abdominal wall in the repair model with combined small intestinal submucosa placement and fascial repair was significantly greater than the values for repairs with fascial closure or small intestinal submucosa placement alone. The use of small intestinal submucosa placement in combination with fascial repair can significantly improve the strength of the repaired abdominal wall after transverse rectus abdominis myocutaneous flap harvesting.

Successful closure of abdominal wall hernias using the components separation technique

The "components separation" technique involves separating the layers of the abdominal wall to allow midline advancement. The purpose of the study was to compare the success rate of the components repair versus other methods. Repair methods included components separation (n = 11), mesh (n = 15), primary (n = 21), TFL grafts (n = 5), TFL or latissimus flaps (n = 4), and rectus turnover (n = 4). The results were: 16 of 60 hernias recurred, with significant risk factors being body mass index (BMI) greater than 30 kg/m2 (p = 0.04), wound infection or breakdown (p < 0.03), and possibly concurrent colostomy or enterocutaneous fistula repair (p = 0.11). Only one of 11 hernias recurred using the components methods, four of 15 recurred using mesh repairs, three of 21 recurred using primary repairs, four of five recurred using TFL grafts, two of four recurred using TFL/latissimus flaps, and two of four recurred using rectus turnovers. There were 19 complications (infection or wound breakdown), with risk factors being smoking (p = 0.002) and possibly BMI greater than 30 kg/m2 (p = 0.08). The results suggest that the components separation method is a viable option for repair of complex abdominal wall hernias without the use of distant flaps or grafts.

Rotation flap of the anterior rectus abdominis sheath for hernia prevention in TRAM breast reconstruction

Prevention of hernia or bulge of the abdominal wall after TRAM breast reconstruction has been a challenge for the reconstruction surgeon. Different techniques have been described to avoid this complication. The use of anterior rectus abdominis sheath (ARAS) for the repair of various abdominal wall hernias has been well described in the literature and is the basis of the authors' technique. The authors present the use of ARAS flap in TRAM breast reconstruction. It is a simple and safe technique using autologous tissues for hernia or bulge prevention.

Drains and seromas in TRAM flap breast reconstruction

Surgeons who perform transverse rectus abdominis musculocutaneous (TRAM) flaps have differing opinions about how many drains are required in the breast and abdomen to prevent seroma. The authors therefore decided to review their experience to determine whether the number of drains influenced the incidence of seroma. All patients who underwent breast reconstruction using TRAM or deep inferior epigastric perforator flaps at The University of Texas M. D. Anderson Cancer Center from January 1, 1995 to June 20, 2000 and whose charts could be retrieved were included in the study. The number of drains used was correlated with the presence or absence of seroma and wound infection in both the abdomen and the breast. Significance was analyzed using the Chi-squared and Fisher's exact tests. There were 608 patients and 768 reconstructive procedures in this series (160 reconstructions were bilateral). Of patients who had only one drain in the abdomen, seroma developed in 9 patients (7.1%), whereas of those having two drains in the abdomen, seroma developed in only 10 patients (2.1%) (p = 0.006). Also, of patients who had only one drain in the breast, seroma developed in the breast in 47 patients (9.1%), and in those with two drains, seroma developed in only 11 patients (4.3%) (p = 0.02). There were no significant differences in the infection rate in either the breast or the abdomen, although the trends favored a lower infection risk when two drains were used. The authors found that using two drains in both the abdomen and the breast can reduce the risk for seroma without increasing the risk for infection. This study supports the use of two drains in both the breast (one each beneath the TRAM flap and in the axilla) and abdomen (beneath the abdominoplasty flap) for patients undergoing breast reconstruction using the TRAM flap.

Contour abnormalities of the abdomen after transverse rectus abdominis muscle flap breast reconstruction: a multifactorial analysis

Contour abnormalities of the abdomen after transverse rectus abdominis muscle (TRAM) flap breast reconstruction occur with all methods of flap elevation and include lower and upper abdominal laxity, epigastric fullness, and hernia. This study is a retrospective analysis of 101 women comparing the many variables that may contribute to an abnormal contour. Statistical analysis comparing the free, pedicled, unilateral, bilateral, muscle-sparing, and non-muscle-sparing flaps was completed using logistic regression. Associated factors, including diabetes mellitus, tobacco use, use of mesh, and prior abdominal operations, were incorporated. Abnormal abdominal contour was present in 13 of 101 women and included 16 specific abnormalities. These included upper abdominal bulge in three women, lower abdominal bulge in eight, and epigastric fullness in five. No woman developed a hernia. Bifactorial analysis demonstrated a significant increase in abnormal contour for the pedicled, bilateral, and non-muscle-sparing TRAM groups when compared with their countervariable groups (free, unilateral, and muscle-sparing TRAM, respectively; p < 0.05). Multifactorial analysis demonstrated a significant increase in abnormal contour in two subgroups (p < 0.05). An analysis of associated factors demonstrated a significant increase in abnormal contour for the bilateral TRAM in the presence of a prior lower midline incision (p < 0.05).

Contour abnormalities of the abdomen after breast reconstruction with abdominal flaps: the role of muscle preservation

The purpose of the present study was to determine whether contour abnormalities of the abdomen after breast reconstruction with abdominal flaps are related to the harvest of the rectus abdominis muscle. Abdominal contour was analyzed in 155 women who had breast reconstruction with abdominal flaps; 108 women had free transverse rectus abdominis muscle (TRAM) flaps, 37 had pedicled TRAM flaps, and 10 had deep inferior epigastric perforator (DIEP) flaps. The reconstruction was unilateral in 110 women and bilateral in 45 women. Three methods of muscle-sparing were used; they are classified as preservation of the lateral muscle, preservation of the medial and lateral muscle, or preservation of the entire muscle. One of these three methods of muscle-sparing was used in 91 women (59 percent) and no muscle-sparing was used in 64 women (41 percent). Postoperative contour abnormalities occurred in 15 woman and included epigastric fullness in five, upper bulge in three, and lower bulge in 10. One woman experienced two abnormalities, one woman experienced three, and no woman developed a hernia. Of these abnormalities, 11 occurred after the free TRAM flap, seven after the pedicled TRAM flap, and none after the DIEP flap. Bilateral reconstruction resulted in 11 abnormalities in nine women, and unilateral reconstruction resulted in seven abnormalities in six women. chi2 analysis of the free and pedicled TRAM flaps demonstrates that muscle-sparing explains the observed differences in upper bulge and upper fullness (p = 0.02), with a trend toward significance for lower bulge (p = 0.06). chi2 analysis of the free TRAM and DIEP flaps does not explain the observed difference in abnormal abdominal contour. Analysis of muscle-sparing and non-muscle-sparing methods demonstrates that the observed difference between the techniques is only explained for a lower bulge after the bilateral free TRAM flap (p = 0.04).

Treatment of difficult TRAM flap hernias using intraperitoneal synthetic mesh application

The authors report the successful repair of large lower abdominal hernia defects after transverse rectus abdominis muscle (TRAM) flap breast reconstruction in 11 patients using a technique of intraperitoneal application of synthetic polypropylene (Prolene) mesh anchored to the peritoneal surface of the abdominal wall tissues. Five of these patients had previously failed hernia repairs after a unipedicle TRAM flap breast reconstruction employing the onlay mesh technique, with two of the patients having undergone three previous hernia repairs. The other six patients had developed large hernias after bipedicle TRAM flap reconstruction without previous mesh supplementation of the abdominal wall repair. After their successful hernia repairs, all of the patients healed without difficulty and demonstrated no sign of recurrence in an 8 to 36-month follow-up. Each patient returned to her activity level before breast reconstruction.