Accurate, firm stabilization using external pins: a proposal for closed reduction of unfavorable nasal bone fractures and their simple classification

Outcomes of Closed versus Open Rhinoplasty: A Systematic Review

Open and closed rhinoplasty are two main approaches to perform nasal modifications. According to current literature, there is no current consensus among plastic surgeons and otolaryngologists on which technique is preferred in terms of aesthetic result, complications, and patient satisfaction. This study uses published research to determine whether open or closed rhinoplasty leads to superior patient outcomes. Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines for systematic reviews were followed and a literature search was conducted in four databases based on our search strategy. Articles were then imported into COVIDENCE where they underwent primary screening and full-text review. Twenty articles were selected in this study after 243 articles were screened. There were 4 case series, 12 retrospective cohort studies, 1 prospective cohort study, 1 case–control, and 2 outcomes research. There were three cosmetic studies, eight functional studies, and nine studies that included both cosmetic and functional components. Sixteen studies utilized both open and closed rhinoplasty and four utilized open rhinoplasty. Both techniques demonstrated high patient and provider satisfaction and no advantage was found between techniques. Based on available studies, we cannot conclude if there is a preference between open or closed rhinoplasty in terms of which technique leads to better patient outcomes. Several studies determined that open rhinoplasty and closed rhinoplasty leads to comparative patient satisfaction. To make outcome reporting more reliable and uniform among studies, authors should look to utilize the Nasal Obstruction and Septoplasty Effectiveness scale and the Rhinoplasty Outcome Evaluation.

Intranasal Bolsters: A Novel Technique for Nasal Bone Stabilization

Nasal bone stabilization, in the setting of comminuted nasal fracture or surgical osteotomy, represents a challenging surgical experience. Postoperative shifting of osseous fragments may result in compromised outcomes in an otherwise well-performed procedure. Although prior studies have reported nasal bone fixation with implementation of wires, plates, or halos, these techniques are often difficult to employ routinely. Herein, the authors describe a novel and facile technique for the maintenance of unstable nasal bones using customized intranasal bolsters.

Closed and Open Reduction of Nasal Fractures

AIM

The objective of this review was to determine the different types of surgical intervention in the management of nasal bone fractures, the outcomes, and complications associated with each intervention.

METHODS

A search was conducted using the PubMed and Cochrane Database of Systematic Review databases from January 1, 1997 until September 9, 2017. The search strategy was constructed using the Population Intervention Comparison Outcome framework with keywords related to nasal fracture and its treatment. Two sets of independent researchers performed the analysis. Qualitative analysis was performed using the Methodological Index for Non-Randomized Studies and National Institute for Clinical Excellence methodology for randomized controlled trial checklists.

RESULTS

The 4276 titles were obtained from PubMed database alone. Exclusion was made based on the title, abstract and full-text analysis. Finally, 23 papers were included and analyzed. Of the 23 papers, 13 (56.5%) were retrospective record review, 2 (8.7%) were randomized clinical trial or a randomized study and 8 case series (34.8%). 16 (69.6%) studies addressed closed reduction, 3 studies (13%) on open reduction and 4 studies (17.4%) addressed both open and closed reduction. The main focus in the outcome in all studies was accuracy of the anatomical reduction of the nasal bones. Three studies (13.0%) reported restoration of function such as breathing comfort or release in respiratory obstruction and another 3 (13.0%) addressed both cosmetic and breathing outcomes. Residual deformity was the most described complications in the studies (30.4%). In general, most of the studies were not of high quality as they lacked in some key elements in the Methodological Index for Non-Randomized Studies checklist.

CONCLUSION

Both closed and open reduction provided good outcomes in cosmetic and breathing. Septoplasty is recommended to be performed simultaneously with fracture reduction.

Fractures of the Nasal Bones: Is External Splinting Really Warranted?

BACKGROUND

It has been advocated that reduction of nasal bone fractures should be followed by internal packing and/or external splinting. Despite the ample literature concerning the advantages and limitations of various splint types, the necessity and effectiveness of external splinting has not been well documented.

OBJECTIVE

To present the authors' experience and review the literature on treatment of nasal bone fractures, focusing on the indications and effectiveness of external splinting following closed reduction.

STUDY DESIGN

Retrospective analysis and literature review.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Medical records of all patients, treated at the Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery of the "KAT" General Hospital of Attica between January 2010 and December 2016 for facial trauma including nasal bone fractures, were retrospectively reviewed. Patient demographic data, fracture type, applied treatment, complications, and final outcome were registered.

RESULTS

A total of 77 patients (58 males; 19 females) were included in the study. The age range was 18 to 65 years (mean, 37.8). Closed reduction without external splinting was performed in 63 patients and open reduction with internal fixation in 6; 8 severely comminuted fractures were treated with closed reduction and external splinting. The mean follow-up was 4.8 months. All severely comminuted fractures presented complications.

CONCLUSIONS

External splinting following closed reduction of nasal bone fractures should not be used routinely but only in selected patients with severe comminution. Since the pertinent literature is inconclusive on the indications and effectiveness of external splinting, randomized controlled studies are warranted to fully elucidate the issue.

Correction of Nasal Fractures

Nasal fractures are the most frequently fractured facial bone from blunt facial trauma resulting in a significant number of patients seeking treatment. Proper evaluation and treatment in the acute setting can minimize secondary surgeries, lower overall health care costs, and increase patient satisfaction. Nasal fracture management, however, varies widely between surgeons. The open treatment of isolated nasal fractures is a particularly controversial subject. This review seeks to describe the existing literature in isolated nasal fracture management.

External fixation of unstable, "flail" nasal fractures

Nasal bone fractures are the most common among facial fractures. Usually these are adequately treated with closed reduction and internal and/or external stabilization with splints. However, there are clinical situations where the nasal bones are severely displaced, the nasal septum fractured and displaced, or there are external drape lacerations which preclude the use of nasal splints. If the nasal bones are reducible but unstable we consider them "flail" and in this case transmucosal, endonasal Kirschner wires are used for dorsal support until sufficient healing occurs. The technique is simple, quick, and predictable and causes minimal discomfort to the patients.

Proposed method for closed reduction of impacted nasal bone fractures using a Kirschner wire and a C-arm

PURPOSE

Closed reduction is commonly used for the treatment of nasal bone fractures. If the fracture is impacted, accurate reduction is difficult. Therefore open reduction is often required.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Between January 2010 and December 2011, we used a Kirschner wire and a C-arm intraoperatively for accurate closed reduction of impacted nasal bone fractures.

RESULTS

During the follow-up period of 4 weeks to 6 months, all patients had satisfactory cosmetic results.

CONCLUSIONS

The effectiveness of open reduction was obtained without noticeable scarring with our method of closed reduction using a Kirschner wire and a C-arm.

Nasal bone clip: a novel approach to nasal bone fixation

BACKGROUND

Nasal bone fracture is a common injury, but its repair can be unexpectedly difficult. To date, intranasal gauze packing has been used to support the nasal bone in position and to maintain contact between the mucosa of the septum and the cartilage. This gauze packing, however, has a tendency to shift, resulting in an inflammatory response characterized by a foul odor until removal, which detracts from the comfort of the patient. We developed a novel device, the nasal bone clip (NBC), which provides a satisfactory nasal airway and improved comfort.

METHODS

A 1.2-mm Kirschner wire and a small piece of hydrocolloid wound dressing are used. The single wire is bent into a double-curved shape, after which each of the 2 tips is curled with pliers. The end of the wire in the nasal passage is covered with a piece of wound dressing to protect the mucosa. After reduction, the external portion of the wire is inserted on the surface of the splint.

RESULTS

The NBC was applied in 14 cases: 12 instances of fresh fractures and 2 of old fractures; there were 8 men and 6 women; their mean age was 19.9 years. Complications were not observed; moreover, no patients exhibited problems during the treatment.

CONCLUSIONS

The advantages of the NBC are that all materials are available in the operating room or outpatient department, it is low cost, it is readily installable and detachable, it affords superior support for gauze packing, it provides effective external splinting with intranasal support, it never disturbs the nasal airway, and it offers comfort.

Repair of nasal complex fractures and the need for secondary septo-rhinoplasty

PURPOSE

This study was undertaken to evaluate the efficacy of closed reduction of nasal fractures and determine the incidence of the need for post-traumatic septo-rhinoplasty in the management of residual nasal deformities.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Medical records of all patients with nasal fractures evaluated and treated by the Division of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery at the University of Florida Health Science Center, Jacksonville, FL between January 2001 and October 2004 were retrospectively evaluated. Out of a total of 344 patients, 50 patients met the inclusion criteria. Forty-four patients (group A) underwent closed reduction of nasal bones and septum along with a septoplasty if needed within 2 weeks of initial injury. Six patients (group B) could not tolerate any surgical intervention because of multisystem injury or comorbidities. All 50 patients were then followed up in the Division of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery to determine overall efficacy of the initial treatment modality, as well as the need for secondary post-traumatic septo-rhinoplasty. Group A was then further subdivided into groups A1 and A2. Group A1 consisted of patients who underwent a closed reduction of their nasal complex fracture without a residual deformity or the need for a secondary post-traumatic septo-rhinoplasty. Group A2 consisted of patients who underwent a closed reduction of their nasal complex fracture and developed a secondary nasal deformity significant enough to require a septo-rhinoplasty.

RESULTS

The follow-up period ranged from 1 week to 12 months. Nine patients in group A were lost to follow-up. Patients in group A1 (31 patients) were pleased with their results and did not require a secondary surgery. Four patients developed a post-traumatic nasal deformity requiring a post-traumatic septo-rhinoplasty (group A2). All patients in group B required post-traumatic septo-rhinoplasty.

CONCLUSION

Closed reduction of nasal fractures appears to be an effective method of treatment as long as careful attention is paid to the key regions in the nasal complex, including the septum at the initial time of treatment. Ideal results are obtained when surgery is performed within 2 weeks of initial injury. Factors such as timing of surgery, the status of the nasal septum, delay in treatment, and other associated injuries may influence the overall result.

Treatment of saddle type nasal fracture using Kirschner wire fixation of nasal septum

For nasal fracture presenting saddle nose deformity, the nasal septum was fixed with the frontal process of the maxillary bone by Kirschner wire. Good results were confirmed with computed tomography, and there was no secondary deformity. This method is easy and provided a firm support for nasal septum. By burying Kirschner wire under the skin, it can be left intact for sufficient time, without disruption of daily life.