Comparison of two dose-response techniques to study the pancreatic secretory response to intraduodenal tryptophan in the absence and presence of the M1-receptor antagonist telenzepine

Multiple roles for cholinergic signaling in pancreatic diseases

Cholinergic nerves are widely distributed throughout the human body and participate in various physiological activities, including sensory, motor, and visceral activities, through cholinergic signaling. Cholinergic signaling plays an important role in pancreatic exocrine secretion. A large number of studies have found that cholinergic signaling overstimulates pancreatic acinar cells through muscarinic receptors, participates in the onset of pancreatic diseases such as acute pancreatitis and chronic pancreatitis, and can also inhibit the progression of pancreatic cancer. However, cholinergic signaling plays a role in reducing pain and inflammation through nicotinic receptors, but enhances the proliferation and invasion of pancreatic tumor cells. This review focuses on the progression of cholinergic signaling and pancreatic diseases in recent years and reveals the role of cholinergic signaling in pancreatic diseases.

Control of pancreatic exocrine secretion via muscarinic receptors: which subtype(s) are involved? A review

The present report gives an overview of the experimental, pharmacological and molecular investigations that have been undertaken during the past two decades to characterize and identify the muscarinic receptor subtype(s) involved in the cholinergic control of pancreatic exocrine secretion in humans and different animal species. The results published in the literature clearly indicate that both M1 and M3 receptors contribute to the regulation of pancreatic enzyme secretion, although contradictory conclusions have been drawn from secretory studies using specific M1 and M3 receptor antagonists in vivo and in vitro. Binding studies using specific M1 and M3 receptor antagonists have supported the existence of both M1 and M3 receptors on pancreatic acinar cells, which was confirmed by the demonstration of specific mRNA for both receptor subtypes in rat pancreatic acinar cells. In addition, experimental evidence exists that nonacinar (possibly presynaptic) M1 receptors also contribute to the control of pancreatic enzyme secretion. The role of the different muscarinic receptor subtypes in the control of pancreatic fluid and bicarbonate output, however, still needs to be clarified. Future research should cover the evaluation of the relative contribution of the different receptor subtypes to the regulation of pancreatic exocrine function, the localization of the receptors involved as well as possible species differences.

Telenzepine-sensitive muscarinic receptors on rat pancreatic acinar cells

To identify the muscarinic subtype present on the rat pancreatic acinar cell, we examined the effects of different muscarinic receptor antagonists on amylase secretion and proteolytic zymogen processing in isolated rat pancreatic acini. Maximal zymogen processing required a concentration of carbachol 10- to 100-fold greater (10(-3) M) than that required for maximal amylase secretion (10(-5) M). Although both secretion and conversion were inhibited by the M3 antagonist 4-diphenylacetoxy-N-methyl-piperidine (4-DAMP) (50% inhibition approximately 6 x 10(-7) M and 1 x 10(-8) M, respectively), the most potent inhibitor was the M1 antagonist telenzepine (50% inhibition approximately 5 x 10(-10) M and 1 x 10(-11) M, respectively). Pirenzepine, another M1 antagonist, and the M2 antagonist methoctramine did not reduce amylase secretion or zymogen processing in concentrations up to 1 x 10(-5) M. Analysis of acinar cell muscarinic receptor by PCR revealed expression of both m1 and m3 subtypes. The pancreatic acinar cell has a distinct pattern of muscarinic antagonist sensitivity (telenzepine >> 4-DAMP > pirenzepine) with respect to both amylase secretion and zymogen conversion.

Pancreatic bicarbonate response to intraduodenal tryptophan in dogs: role of muscarinic M1-receptors and cholecystokinin

CONCLUSIONS

In dogs, 1. Activation of cholecystokinin-receptors is needed for an adequate pancreatic bicarbonate response to secretin; 2. Cholinergic nerve fibers ending on M1-receptors are probably of little or no importance for the bicarbonate response to secretin in the given dose; 3. The bicarbonate response to tryptophan, given with a secretin background, is controlled by cholinergic M1-fibers and by cholecystokinin; 4. M1-fibers mainly mediate the bicarbonate response to low loads of tryptophan, whereas cholecystokinin controls the response to low and high loads of tryptophan; and 5. Both mediators interact in a synergistic manner.

METHODS

In six conscious dogs with chronic gastric and duodenal fistulas, we compared the action of the M1-receptor antagonist telenzepine (20.25-81.0 nmol/kg/h), the cholecystokinin-receptor antagonist L-364,718 (0.025-0.1 mg/kg/h), and combinations of both on the pancreatic bicarbonate response to graded loads of intraduodenal tryptophan (0.37-10.0 mmol/h), given against a background of secretin (20.5 pmol/kg/h).

RESULTS

Secretin significantly (p < 0.05) stimulated the pancreatic bicarbonate output above basal levels. All doses of L-374,718, but not telenzepine, significantly decreased the bicarbonate response to secretin by up to 64%. Additional administration of telenzepine together with L-364,718 had no further inhibitory effect on the secretin-stimulated bicarbonate output as compared to L-364,718 given alone. All loads of tryptophan significantly increased the bicarbonate output over that seen with secretin alone (= incremental bicarbonate response to tryptophan). Telenzepine significantly decreased the incremental bicarbonate response to the two lower loads (0.37-1.1 mmol/h) of tryptophan (by 82-124%); L-364,718 decreased the incremental bicarbonate response to all loads of tryptophan (by 50-118%). The incremental bicarbonate output, as well as the 180-min integrated bicarbonate response to all loads of tryptophan, were abolished by all combinations of both antagonists.