Admission screening for hepatitis B surface antigen in a university hospital

Risk of occupational infection with blood-borne pathogens in operating and delivery room settings

Surveillance data and case reports substantiate that health care workers are at risk for occupationally acquired infection with blood-borne pathogens. The risk of transmission of blood-borne pathogens to a health care worker depends on the prevalence of blood-borne pathogen infection among patients, the likelihood of transmission of infection per blood contact, and the nature and frequency of occupational blood contacts. In surgical and obstetrical settings, blood contact varies with occupation, specialty, procedures performed, and precautions used. Many contacts appear to be preventable by changes in technique or instrument design and by use of protective barriers. Studies are needed to assess the impact of such interventions.

Hepatitis B virus infection and health care workers

Hepatitis B virus (HBV) infection is the major occupational risk of health care workers, among whom HBV infection risk is 2 to 10-fold elevated above that of the general population. Risk is most clearly related to the degree of direct contact with human blood and body fluids, and to frequency of traumatic exposures in the workplace. Most exposures result from unsuspected asymptomatic HBV carriers, who represent 1 to 2% of hospitalized patients. Risk of HBV infection also varies with the frequency of HBV carriers in the patient population. In the USA, the annual number of new cases has been constant over the last decade, despite a 50% overall increase in acute HBV disease. Control of HBV in the work setting is based on universal precautions for exposure to human blood or body fluids, and hepatitis B vaccination. Increased attention to these recommendations appears to be reducing this problem in the USA.

Hepatitis B: a case for prenatal screening of all patients

Evaluation of a mass screening program to detect hepatitis B surface antigen in the obstetric population of Shands Hospital, University of Florida in Gainesville, from January 1, 1983, through December 31, 1985, was undertaken. Prevalence of hepatitis B surface antigen seropositivity was 0.54%. Review of medical records revealed that 67% of patients with positive hepatitis B surface antigen screens had no risk factors identifiable by routine prenatal history. Although all patients were screened on admission to the hospital, the results of the immunoassay were not available in time for staff to institute isolation procedures for the laboring mother or unwashed neonate. In 82% of the cases, treatment of neonates occurred later than 12 hours after delivery (the current Centers for Disease Control recommendation). It is recommended that prenatal screening of all patients with a hepatitis B surface antigen immunoassay be done by 34 weeks' gestation where the patient population is of predominantly low socioeconomic status to ensure appropriate isolation and timely neonatal immunoprophylaxis.

Serologic survey for markers of hepatitis B infection in dermatologists

A serologic survey for markers of hepatitis B virus (HBV) infection was conducted in 593 dermatologists. Serologic evidence for previous infection was found in 15.4%, indicating that dermatologists are an at-risk population comparable to many other specialties of medicine. Dermatologists with a history of blood transfusion, tattoo, and homosexuality had an increased prevalence of serologic markers for HBV. The type of practice, extent of surgery, and glove-wearing practices did not correlate with HBV serologic markers.

Hepatitis B exposure in emergency medical personnel. Prevalence of serologic markers and need for immunization

To assess the occupational risk of hepatitis B infection in emergency medical personnel, a seroepidemiologic survey of 87 emergency medical technicians and paramedics was conducted. Serologic markers indicating exposure to hepatitis B virus were detected in 18 percent. The prevalence of markers was associated with race (p = 0.006), with a relative risk of 3.5 (95 percent confidence interval 1.42 to 8.63) for nonwhites. Seropositivity was not associated with age, sex, previous clinical hepatitis, or blood transfusion. There was a suggestion that duration of employment as an emergency medical technician was related to the prevalence of hepatitis B markers (p = 0.11). Efforts to control the risk of hepatitis B infection in this profession are complicated by unique problems with post-exposure prophylaxis and uncontrolled exposure to blood. Immunization with hepatitis B vaccine would be the optimal strategy to reduce infection in this high-risk occupation.