Use of the exercise treadmill to measure baseline functional status and surgical outcome in patients with severe lumbar spinal stenosis

Validity of outcome measures used in randomized clinical trials and observational studies in degenerative lumbar spinal stenosis

It is unclear whether outcome measures used in degenerative lumbar spinal stenosis (DLSS) have been validated for this condition. Cross-sectional analysis of studies for DLSS included in systematic reviews (SA) and meta-analyses (MA) indexed in the Cochrane Library. We extracted all outcome measures for pain and disability. We assessed whether the studies provided external references for the validity of the outcome measures and the quality of the validation studies. Out of 20 SA/MA, 95 primary studies used 242 outcome measures for pain and/or disability. Most commonly used were the VAS (n = 69), the Oswestry Disability Index (n = 53) and the Zurich Claudication Questionnaire (n = 22). Although validation references were provided in 45 (47.3%) primary studies, only 14 validation studies for 9 measures (disability n = 7, pain and disability combined n = 2) were specifically validated in a DLSS population. The quality of the validation studies was mainly poor. The Zurich Claudication Questionnaire was the only disease specific tool with adequate validation for assessing treatment response in DLSS. To compare results from clinical studies, outcome measures need to be validated in a disease specific population. The quality of validation studies need to be improved and the validity in studies adequately cited.

Moving toward better health: exercise practice is associated with improved outcomes after spine surgery in people with degenerative lumbar conditions

Background:

Recovery and rehabilitation following surgery can take many months. Understanding what patients can do to facilitate recovery would be beneficial for spinal surgeons. This study sought to evaluate the impact of exercise practice, before and after surgery, on long-term outcomes of spine surgery in a robust clinical sample.

Methods:

This prospective longitudinal cohort study included adult patients undergoing spinal surgery for degenerative spinal conditions. Patients were administered a survey that included preoperative and postoperative exercise practices and the following patient-reported outcome measures: the physical component score (PCS) and mental component score (MCS) of the Medical Outcomes Study 36-Item Short Form Survey (Rand-36), the Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) score, the Numeric Rating Scale (NRS) score for pain and the Patient-Reported Outcome Measurement Information System (PROMIS) Pain Interference Short Form score. Random effects models investigated the relationship of exercise, follow-up time and their interaction in predicting each patient-reported outcome measure over time, with and without sociodemographic covariates.

Results:

There were 168 patients in the study sample with up to 12 months of follow-up data. Analysis revealed modest significant main effects of exercise on PCS, MCS, ODI and PROMIS scores and main effects of time on all outcomes. The exercise-by-time interaction was significant in predicting the trajectories of the ODI and MCS scores. When full models were adjusted for education and employment status, interaction effects were no longer significant, but exercise main effects remained significant for ODI score.

Conclusion:

Patients who engage in exercise before and after spine surgery have better mental health and spine-specific recovery trajectories than those who do not. All health care providers should encourage patients to exercise while they are waiting for surgery within preoperative limitations and as soon as they are able after surgery and to continue this over the long term.

Differences in Functional Treadmill Tests in Patients With Adult Symptomatic Lumbar Scoliosis Treated Operatively and Nonoperatively

STUDY DESIGN

Prospective longitudinal cohort.

OBJECTIVES

The aim of this study was to determine whether functional treadmill testing (FTT) demonstrates differences between patients treated operatively and nonoperatively for adult symptomatic lumbar scoliosis (ASLS).

SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA

ASLS has become increasingly prevalent as the population ages. ASLS can be accompanied by neurogenic claudication, leading to difficulty walking. FTT may provide a functional tool to evaluate patients with ASLS.

METHODS

One hundred and eighty-seven patients who underwent nonoperative (n = 88) or operative treatment (n = 99) of ASLS with complete baseline and 2-year post-treatment FTTs and concurrent patient-reported outcomes were identified. FTT parameters included maximum speed, time to onset of symptoms, distance ambulated, time ambulated, and Back and Leg pain severity before and after testing.

RESULTS

At baseline, patients treated operatively reported worse post-FTT back pain (4.39 vs. 3.45, P = 0.032) than those treated nonoperatively, despite similar ODI, SRS-22 Pain and Activity domain scores. Mean time ambulated (+2.15 vs. -1.20 P = 0.001), pre-FTT back pain (+0.19 vs. -1.60, P < 0.000) and leg pain (+0.25 vs. -0.54, P = 0.024) improved in the operative group but deteriorated in the nonoperative group. On the 2-year follow-up FTT, both groups showed improvement in post-FTT back pain (-0.53 vs. -2.64, P < 0.000) and leg pain (-0.13 vs. -1.54, P = 0.001) severity but the improvement was statistically significantly greater in the operative compared to the nonoperative group.

CONCLUSION

FTT results at baseline were worse in patients treated operatively than those treated non-operatively. FTT may be a useful adjunct to assess treatment outcomes in patients with ASLS and may help surgeons counsel patients regarding expectations 2 years after operative or nonoperative treatment for ASLS. At 2-year follow-up, time ambulated deteriorated in patients treated nonoperatively but improved in patients treated operatively. Although both groups showed improvement in post-FTT Back and Leg pain at 2 years, the improvement was greater in the operative compared to the nonoperative group.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

2.

Objective measures of functional impairment for degenerative diseases of the lumbar spine: a systematic review of the literature

BACKGROUND CONTEXT

The accurate determination of a patient's functional status is necessary for therapeutic decision-making and to critically appraise treatment efficacy. Current subjective patient-reported outcome measure (PROM)-based assessments have limitations and can be complimented by objective measures of function.

PURPOSE

To systematically review the literature and provide an overview on the available objective measures of function for patients with degenerative diseases of the lumbar spine.

STUDY DESIGN/SETTING

Systematic review of the literature.

METHODS

The Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines were followed. Two reviewers independently searched the PubMed, Web of Science, EMBASE, and SCOPUS databases for permutations of the words "objective," "assessment," "function," "lumbar," and "spine" including articles on human subjects with degenerative diseases of the lumbar spine that reported on objective measures of function, published until September 2018. Risk of bias was not assessed. No funding was received. The authors report no conflicts of interest.

RESULTS

Of 2,389 identified articles, 82 were included in the final analysis. There was a significant increase of 0.12 per year in the number of publications dealing with objective measures of function since 1989 (95% CI 0.08-0.16, p<.001). Some publications studied multiple diagnoses and objective measures. The United States was the leading nation in terms of scientific output for objective outcome measures (n=21; 25.6%), followed by Switzerland (n=17; 20.7%), Canada, Germany, and the United Kingdom (each n=6; 7.3%). Our search revealed 21 different types of objective measures, predominantly applied to patients with lumbar spinal stenosis (n=67 publications; 81.7%), chronic/unspecific low back pain (n=28; 34.2%) and lumbar disc herniation (n=22; 26.8%). The Timed-Up-and-Go test was the most frequently applied measure (n=26 publications; 31.7%; cumulative number of reported subjects: 5,181), followed by the Motorized Treadmill Test (n=25 publications; 30.5%, 1,499 subjects) and with each n=9 publications (11.0%) the Five-Repetition Sit-To-Stand test (955 subjects), as well as accelerometry analyses (336 subjects). The reliability and validity of many of the less-applied objective measures was uncertain. There was profound heterogeneity in their application and interpretation of results.

CONCLUSIONS

Clinical studies on patients with lumbar degenerative diseases increasingly employ objective measures of function, which offer high potential for improving the quality of outcome measurement in patient-care and research. This review provides an overview on available options. Our findings call for an agreement and standardization in terms of test selection, conduction and analysis to facilitate comparison of results across cohorts.

PROSPERO REGISTRATION NUMBER

CRD42019122622.

Decompression surgery improves gait quality in patients with symptomatic lumbar spinal stenosis

BACKGROUND CONTEXT

We aimed to fully understand the extent of limitations associated with symptomatic lumbar spinal stenosis (LSS) and the functional outcome of its treatment, including not only function during daily activities (eg, using the 6-minute walk test [6MWT]) but also the quality of function that should be objectively assessed.

PURPOSE

This study was performed to test the hypothesis that the Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) score, the walking distance during the 6MWT (6-minute walking distance [6MWD]), and gait quality (spatiotemporal parameters and gait asymmetry) will improve postoperatively and achieve normal values; to determine if changes in gait parameters correlate with changes in Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) score; and to ascertain if patients' gait quality will diminish during the 6MWT, reflected by changes in gait parameters during the 6MWT.

STUDY DESIGN/SETTING

This is a prospective observational study with intervention.

PATIENT SAMPLE

The sample comprised patients with symptomatic LSS.

OUTCOME MEASURES

The ODI score, gait quality (spatiotemporal and asymmetry), and walking performance (walking distance during the 6MWT) were the outcome measures.

METHODS

Patients with symptomatic LSS were analyzed on the day before surgery and 10 weeks and 12 months postoperatively. Functional disability in daily life was assessed by the ODI. Spatiotemporal and kinematic gait parameters were recorded with an inertial sensor system during the 6MWT, and the 6MWD was determined. Gait asymmetry was defined as 100*|right-left|/(0.5*(|right+left|)).

RESULTS

The ODI decreased by 17.9% and 23.9% and 6MWD increased by 21 m and 26 m from baseline to 10-week and 12-month follow-up, respectively. Gait quality did not change during the 6MWT at any assessment or between assessments. Compared with the control group, patients walked less during the 6MWT, and gait quality differed between patients and the control group at baseline and 10-week follow-up but not at 12-month follow-up. Change in gait quality explained 39% and 73% of variance in change in ODI from baseline to 10-week and to 12-month follow-up, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

Changes in gait quality explained a large portion of variance in changes in the ODI, indicating that patients with symptomatic LSS perceive their compromised gait quality as functional limitations. Gait data obtained by instrumented gait analysis contain information on gait quality that can be helpful for evaluating functional limitations in patients with LSS, the outcome of decompression surgery, and the development of patient-specific rehabilitation regimens.

Lumbar spinal stenosis: symptoms, diagnosis and treatment (meta-analysis of literature data)

Lumbar spinal stenosis is a disease in which degenerated discs, ligamentum flavum, facet joints, while aging, lead to a narrowing of the space around the neurovascular structures of the spine. This article presents a meta-analysis of literature data on epidemiology, causes, pathogenesis, diagnosis and various types of treatment of lumbar spinal stenosis.

Preliminary Results of Relationship between Preoperative Walking Ability and Magnetic Resonance Imaging Morphology in Patients with Lumbar Canal Stenosis: Comparison between Trefoil and Triangle Types of Spinal Stenosis

Study Design

Cross-sectional.

Purpose

To examine the relationship between magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) morphology stenosis grades and preoperative walking ability in patients with lumbar canal stenosis (LCS).

Overview of Literature

No previous study has analyzed the correlation between MRI morphology stenosis grades and walking ability in patients with LCS.

Methods

This prospective study included 98 consecutive patients with LCS who were candidates for surgery. Using features identified in T2-weighted axial magnetic, stenosis type was determined at the maximal stenosis level, and only trefoil and triangle stenosis grade types were considered because of sufficient sample size. Intraobserver and interobserver reliability were assessed by calculating weighted kappa coefficients. Symptom severity was evaluated via the Japanese Orthopedic Association Back Pain Evaluation Questionnaire (JOABPEQ). Walking ability was assessed using the Self-Paced Walking Test (SPWT) and JOABPEQ subscales. Demographic characteristics, SPWT scores, and JOABPEQ scores were compared between patients with trefoil and triangle stenosis types.

Results

The mean patient age was 58.1 (standard deviation, 8.4) years. The kappa values of the MRI morphology stenosis grade types showed a perfect agreement between the stenosis grade types. The trefoil group (n=53) and triangle group (n=45) showed similar preoperative JOABPEQ subscale scores (e.g., low back pain, lumbar function, and mental health) and were not significantly different in age, BMI, duration of symptoms, or lumbar stenosis levels (all p>0.05); however, trefoil stenosis grade type was associated with a decreased walking ability according to the SPWT and JOABPEQ subscale scores.

Conclusions

These findings suggest preoperative walking ability is more profoundly affected in patients with trefoil type stenosis than in those with triangle type stenosis.

Management of lumbar spinal stenosis

Lumbar spinal stenosis (LSS) affects more than 200,000 adults in the United States, resulting in substantial pain and disability. It is the most common reason for spinal surgery in patients over 65 years. Lumbar spinal stenosis is a clinical syndrome of pain in the buttocks or lower extremities, with or without back pain. It is associated with reduced space available for the neural and vascular elements of the lumbar spine. The condition is often exacerbated by standing, walking, or lumbar extension and relieved by forward flexion, sitting, or recumbency. Clinical care and research into lumbar spinal stenosis is complicated by the heterogeneity of the condition, the lack of standard criteria for diagnosis and inclusion in studies, and high rates of anatomic stenosis on imaging studies in older people who are completely asymptomatic. The options for non-surgical management include drugs, physiotherapy, spinal injections, lifestyle modification, and multidisciplinary rehabilitation. However, few high quality randomized trials have looked at conservative management. A systematic review concluded that there is insufficient evidence to recommend any specific type of non-surgical treatment. Several different surgical procedures are used to treat patients who do not improve with non-operative therapies. Given that rapid deterioration is rare and that symptoms often wax and wane or gradually improve, surgery is almost always elective and considered only if sufficiently bothersome symptoms persist despite trials of less invasive interventions. Outcomes (leg pain and disability) seem to be better for surgery than for non-operative treatment, but the evidence is heterogeneous and often of limited quality.

Gait behaviors as an objective surgical outcome in low back disorders: A systematic review

BACKGROUND

Objective motor performance measures, especially gait assessment, could improve evaluation of low back disorder surgeries. However, no study has compared the relative effectiveness of gait parameters for assessing motor performance in low back disorders after surgery. The purpose of the current review was to determine the sensitive gait parameters that address physical improvements in each specific spinal disorder after surgical intervention.

METHODS

Articles were searched with the following inclusion criteria: 1) population studied consisted of individuals with low back disorders requiring surgery; 2) low back disorder was measured objectively using gait assessment tests pre- and post-surgery. The quality of the selected studies was assessed using Delphi consensus, and meta-analysis was performed to compare pre- and post-surgical changes.

FINDINGS

Thirteen articles met inclusion criteria, which, almost exclusively, addressed two types of spinal disorders/interventions: 1) scoliosis/spinal fusion; and 2) stenosis/decompression. For patients with scoliosis, improvements in hip and shoulder motion (effect size=0.32-1.58), energy expenditure (effect size=0.59-1.18), and activity symmetry of upper-body muscles during gait were present after spinal fusion. For patients with spinal stenosis, increases in gait speed, stride length, cadence, symmetry, walking smoothness, and walking endurance (effect size=0.60-2.50), and decrease in gait variability (effect size=1.45) were observed after decompression surgery.

INTERPRETATION

For patients with scoliosis, gait improvements can be better assessed by measuring upper-body motion and EMG rather than the lower extremities. For patients with spinal stenosis, motor performance improvements can be captured by measuring walking spatio-temporal parameters, gait patterns, and walking endurance.

A Randomized, Double-blind, Placebo-Controlled Crossover Trial of Oxymorphone Hydrochloride and Propoxyphene/Acetaminophen Combination for the Treatment of Neurogenic Claudication Associated With Lumbar Spinal Stenosis

STUDY DESIGN

Randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, single-dose crossover study.

OBJECTIVE

To test the analgesic efficacy of oxymorphone hydrochloride (OH) and propoxyphene/acetaminophen (PA) for patients with neurogenic claudication associated with lumbar spinal stenosis.

SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA

Although opioids are often prescribed for neurogenic claudication, no randomized controlled studies support their efficacy for this condition. Patients with neurogenic claudication are generally excluded from clinical trials or included with patients who have nonspecific chronic low back pain, yielding a heterogeneous study population with very different pathophysiologies and clinical presentations.

METHODS

Participants received a single dose of each of the 3 treatments in random order. Treatments were separated by at least 3-day washout periods. The primary outcome variable was the time to first treadmill walking-induced moderate pain (≥4 out of 10 on a Numeric Rating Scale) (Tfirst) assessed 90 minutes after treatment administration. Secondary outcome measures included patient global assessment of low back pain, Roland-Morris Disability Questionnaire, Modified Brief Pain Inventory-Short Form, Oswestry Disability Index, and Swiss Spinal Stenosis Questionnaire.

RESULTS

The study was prematurely terminated because of the removal of PA from the US market. Twenty-four patients were randomized; 21 completed all 3 treatment periods. There were no significant differences among the treatment groups with respect to the median Tfirst (OH-placebo: median [98.3% confidence limits]=-0.25 min [-6.54, 5.00]; PA-placebo: 0.02 min [-7.65, 4.90]; OH-PA: -0.27 min [-5.56, 6.66]).

CONCLUSION

This trial failed to demonstrate a benefit of OH or PA in patients experiencing neurogenic claudication. Considering the potential negative side effects of chronic opioid use, additional research is necessary to evaluate the efficacy of sustained opioid treatment specifically for neurogenic claudication.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

2.

Is the sedimentation sign associated with spinal stenosis surgical treatment effect in SPORT?

STUDY DESIGN

Subgroup analysis of the lumbar spinal stenosis (LSS) without degenerative spondylolisthesis diagnostic cohort of the Spine Patient Outcomes Research Trial multicenter randomized clinical trial with a concurrent observational cohort.

OBJECTIVE

To determine if sedimentation sign on magnetic resonance image can help with LSS treatment decisions.

SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA

LSS is one of the most common reasons for surgery in the US elderly, but there is a dearth of reliable diagnostic tools that give a clear indication for surgery. Recent studies have suggested that positive sedimentation sign on magnetic resonance image may be a possible prognostic indicator.

METHODS

All patients with LSS in both the randomized and observational cohorts had imaging-confirmed stenosis, were surgical candidates, and had neurogenic claudication for at least 12 weeks prior to enrollment. Patients were categorized as "mild," "moderate," or "severe" according to stenosis severity. Of the 654 patients with LSS enrolled in Spine Patient Outcomes Research Trial, complete T2-weighted axial and sagittal digitized images of 115 patients were available for retrospective review. An independent orthopedic spine surgeon evaluated these deidentified Digital Imaging and Communications in Medicine files for the sedimentation sign.

RESULTS

Sixty-six percent (76/115) of patients were found to have a positive sedimentation sign. Those with a positive sedimentation sign were more likely to have stenosis at L2-L3 (33% vs. 10% P=0.016) or L3-L4 76% vs. 51%, P=0.012), and to have severe (72% vs. 33%, P<0.0001) central stenosis (93% vs. 67% P<0.001) at 2 or more concurrent levels (57% vs. 18%, P=0.01). In multivariate models, the surgical treatment effect was significantly larger in the positive sedimentation sign group for Oswestry Disability Index (-16 vs. -7; P=0.02).

CONCLUSION

A positive sedimentation sign was associated with a small but significantly greater surgical treatment effect for Oswestry Disability Index in patients with symptomatic LSS, after adjusting for other demographic and imaging features. These findings suggest that positive sedimentation sign may potentially be a useful adjunct to help guide an informed treatment choice regarding surgery for LSS.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

2.

Double-blind, randomized, controlled, crossover trial of pregabalin for neurogenic claudication

Objectives:

To test the effects of pregabalin on the induction of neurogenic claudication.

Methods:

This study was a randomized, double-blind, active placebo-controlled, 2-period, crossover trial. Twenty-nine subjects were randomized to receive pregabalin followed by active placebo (i.e., diphenhydramine) or active placebo followed by pregabalin. Each treatment period lasted 10 days, including a 2-step titration. Periods were separated by a 10-day washout period, including a 3-day taper phase after the first period. The primary outcome variable was the time to first moderate pain symptom (Numeric Rating Scale score ≥4) during a 15-minute treadmill test (T_first). Secondary outcome measures included pain intensity at rest, pain intensity at the end of the treadmill test, distance walked, and validated self-report measures of pain and functional limitation including the Roland-Morris Disability Questionnaire, modified Brief Pain Inventory–Short Form, Oswestry Disability Index, and Swiss Spinal Stenosis Questionnaire.

Results:

No significant difference was found between pregabalin and active placebo for the time to first moderate pain symptom (difference in median T_first = −1.08 [95% confidence interval −2.25 to 0.08], p = 0.61). In addition, none of the secondary outcome measures of pain or functional limitation were significantly improved by pregabalin compared with active placebo.

Conclusions:

Pregabalin was not more effective than active placebo in reducing painful symptoms or functional limitations in patients with neurogenic claudication associated with lumbar spinal stenosis.

Classification of evidence:

This study provides Class I evidence that for patients with neurogenic claudication, compared with diphenhydramine, pregabalin does not increase the time to moderate pain during a treadmill test.

Comparison between walking test and treadmill test for intermittent claudication associated with lumbar spinal canal stenosis

PURPOSE

To clarify the priorities of the walking test and the treadmill test for intermittent claudication of lumbar canal stenosis.

METHODS

The study population comprised 45 subjects, with a mean age of 72.6 years. An investigator walked with the subjects during the walking test or watched the subjects walking on the treadmill machine in the treadmill test.

RESULTS

The pain scales became significantly worse after the walking test. Ten patients who were diagnosed as root symptom type or cauda equine symptoms were subsequently diagnosed as mixed type by the walking test. The numbers of patients who experienced muscle weakness that was not revealed at rest were eight with the walking test and seven with the treadmill test. The numbers of patients who experienced sensory disturbance that was not observed at rest were seven with the walking test and two with the treadmill test.

CONCLUSIONS

The walking test detected significantly more symptoms that were not detected at rest than the treadmill test.

Improving treadmill performance in patients with lumbar stenosis: evaluation of a custom angle load reduction device

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this study was to evaluate a custom angle load reduction rolling walker to determine the relationship between flexion and load reduction on walking performance in patients with lumbar spinal stenosis.The hypothesis was that walking performance in patients with lumbar spinal stenosis would be significantly improved using the Oliver Static Measuring Apparatus device compared with unaided treadmill walking.

DESIGN

Fifteen patients with symptomatic neurogenic intermittent claudication caused by lumbar spinal stenosis were recruited at a Veterans Affairs Medical Center. This study used a cross-sectional design with two random-order treadmill conditions: (1) spinal flexion and unloading and (2) level walking. Primary outcome measures included initiation time of first symptoms, total walking time, spinal flexion angle, and unloading force. Secondary measures included baseline pain, fatigue, and disability severity.

RESULTS

The participants' initiation time of symptoms and total walking time were significantly greater with the use of the Oliver Static Measuring Apparatus compared with the unaided walking trial. The participants with increased baseline pain, fatigue, and disability severity had decreased walking performance for the unaided condition but not for the Oliver Static Measuring Apparatus condition.

CONCLUSIONS

The results show that spinal flexion is important for pain reduction in lumbar spinal stenosis. The Oliver Static Measuring Apparatus device used in this study was shown to be effective and immediate in significantly increasing total walking time and prolonging the onset of neurogenic intermittent claudication symptoms while ambulating.

Does the presence of the nerve root sedimentation sign on MRI correlate with the operative level in patients undergoing posterior lumbar decompression for lumbar stenosis?

BACKGROUND CONTEXT

Recent research describes the use of a nerve root sedimentation sign to diagnose lumbar spinal stenosis (LSS). The lack of sedimentation of the nerve roots (positive sedimentation sign) to the dorsal part of the dural sac is the characteristic feature of this new radiological parameter.

PURPOSE

To demonstrate how the nerve root sedimentation sign compares with other more traditional radiological parameters in patients who have been operated for LSS.

STUDY DESIGN/SETTING

A retrospective chart and image review.

PATIENT SAMPLE

Preoperative magnetic resonance images (MRIs) were reviewed from 71 consecutive operative patients who presented with LSS and received spinal decompression surgery from 2006 to 2010.

OUTCOME MEASURES

Preoperative T2-weighted MRIs were reviewed for each patient.

METHODS

One hundred thirty-four vertebral levels from L1 to L5 were measured for: sedimentation sign, cross-sectional area (CSA) and anterior/posterior (A/P) diameter of the dural sac, thickness of the ligamentum flavum, and Fujiwara grade of facet hypertrophy. Radiological measurements were made using Surgimap 1.1.2.169 software (Nemaris, Inc., New York, NY, USA). Statistical analyses were performed using the SPSS 17.0 statistical software (SPSS Inc., Chicago, IL, USA). Significance was demonstrated using unpaired t tests and chi-squared tests. Study funding was departmental. There were no study-specific conflicts of interest-associated biases.

RESULTS

A positive sedimentation sign was determined in 120 operated levels (89.5%), whereas 14 levels (10.5%) had no sign (negative sedimentation sign). The mean CSA and A/P diameter were 140.62 mm(2) (standard deviation [SD]=53) and 11.76 mm (SD=3), respectively, for the no-sign group; the mean CSA and A/P diameter were 81.87 mm(2) (SD=35) and 8.76 mm (SD=2.2), respectively, for the sedimentation sign group (p<.001). We found that 60% of levels with Fujiwara Grade A facet hypertrophy did not have a sedimentation sign, whereas 86.3% of levels with Grade B, 93.2% of levels with Grade C, and 100.0% of levels with Grade D did have a sedimentation sign (p<.001).

CONCLUSIONS

The sedimentation sign is a new measurement tool that can enable physicians to objectively assess and quantify spinal stenosis. The sign is most often present in patients who have clinically significant lumbar stenosis and require surgery.

Military rank and the symptoms of lumbar disc herniation in young Korean soldiers

OBJECTIVE

There are many factors associated with the symptom presentation of lumbar disc herniation (LDH). However, there are only few reports regarding the clinical feature of LDH in military medicine. The objective of this study is to determine the factors that affected the symptoms of LDH in young Korean soldiers.

METHODS

One hundred thirty male soldiers, diagnosed with LDH, were enrolled in this study. They were divided into four groups, according to their military ranks: private, private first class, corporal, and sergeant. The visual analog scale for low back pain (VAS-LBP), the VAS for leg pain (VAS-LP), and the Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) were evaluated. The education level and military rank were also reviewed and their relationship with the degree of symptoms was investigated.

RESULTS

The mean age for the male subjects enrolled was 20.7 ± 1.2. The mean VAS-LBP, VAS-LP, and ODI were 6.6% ± 1.7%, 7.1% ± 1.9%, and 46.0% ± 16.3%, respectively. There was no statistically significant relationship between the degree of symptoms and the radiologic findings. However, the military rank had an inverse correlation with the VAS scores and the ODI (P < 0.05).

CONCLUSION

Our data showed that the military rank was associated with the symptom presentation of LDH and reflected the characteristics of military life.

Hip-spine syndrome

The incidence of symptomatic osteoarthritis of the hip and degenerative lumbar spinal stenosis is increasing in our aging population. Because the subjective complaints can be similar, it is often difficult to differentiate intra- and extra-articular hip pathology from degenerative lumbar spinal stenosis. These conditions can present concurrently, which makes it challenging to determine the predominant underlying pain generator. A thorough history and physical examination, coupled with selective diagnostic testing, can be performed to differentiate between these clinical entities and help prioritize management. Determining the potential benefit from surgical intervention and the order in which to address these conditions are of utmost importance for patient satisfaction and adequate relief of symptoms.

Relationship between ambulatory performance and self-rated disability in patients with lumbar spinal stenosis

STUDY DESIGN

A cross-sectional study.

OBJECTIVE

To identify the relationship between performance measures derived from accelerometry and subjective reports of pain, disability, and health in patients with lumbar spinal stenosis (LSS).

SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA

Accelerometers have emerged as a measure of performance, providing the ability to characterize the pattern and magnitude of real-life activity, and sedentarism. Pain and loss of function, particularly ambulation, are common in LSS. The extent to which pain, perceived disability, and self-rated health relate to performance in patients with LSS is not well known.

METHODS

Data regarding self-reported pain, disability (Oswestry Disability Index, Roland-Morris Disability Questionnaire, and Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand), and health (36-Item Short Form Health Survey [SF-36]) were collected from patients with LSS (n = 33). Physical activity, ambulation, and inactivity performance measures were derived from 7-day accelerometer records. Correlation and stepwise regression were used.

RESULTS

The physical function subscale of the SF-36, a non-pathology-specific outcome, had the best overall correlation to physical activity and ambulation (average r = 0.53) compared with pain (average r = 0.32) and disability (average r = -0.45) outcomes. Stepwise regression models for performance were predominantly single-variable models (4 of 8 models); pain was not selected as a predictor. A second non-pathology-specific outcome, the Disabilities of Arm Shoulder and Hand, improved the prediction of performance in 5 of 8 models.

CONCLUSION

Subjective measures of pain and disability had limited ability to account for real-life performance in patients with LSS. Future research is required to identify determinants of performance in patients with LSS because barriers to activity may not be disease-specific.

Predictors of walking performance and walking capacity in people with lumbar spinal stenosis, low back pain, and asymptomatic controls

OBJECTIVE

To examine predictors of community walking performance and walking capacity in people with lumbar spinal stenosis (LSS), compared with people with low back pain and asymptomatic control subjects.

DESIGN

Retrospective analysis.

SETTING

University spine program.

PARTICIPANTS

Participants (N=126; 50 LSS, 44 low back pain, 32 asymptomatic control subjects) aged 55 to 80 years were studied.

INTERVENTIONS

Not applicable.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

Seven-day community walking distance measured by pedometer (walking performance) and a 15-minute walking test (walking capacity). All participants had lumbosacral magnetic resonance imaging, electrodiagnostic testing, and a history and physical examination, including a history of pain and neurologic symptoms, a straight leg raise test, and tests for directional symptoms, reflexes, strength, and nerve tension signs. The study questionnaire included demographic information, a history of back/leg pain, and questions about walking, exercise frequency, and pain level, as well as the standardized Quebec Back Pain Disability Scale.

RESULTS

Body mass index (BMI), pain, age, and female sex predicted walking performance (r(2)=.41) and walking capacity (r(2)=.41). The diagnosis of LSS itself had no clear relationship with either walking variable. Compared with the asymptomatic group, LSS participants had significantly lower values for all walking parameters, with the exception of stride length, while there was no significant difference between the LSS and low back pain groups.

CONCLUSIONS

BMI, pain, female sex, and age predict walking performance and capacity in people with LSS, those with low back pain, and asymptomatic control subjects. While pain was the strongest predictor of walking capacity, BMI was the strongest predictor of walking performance. Average pain, rather than leg pain, was predictive of walking performance and capacity. Obesity and pain are modifiable predictors of walking deficits that could be targets for future intervention studies aimed at increasing walking performance and capacity in both the low back pain and LSS populations.

Quantification of walking ability in subjects with neurogenic claudication from lumbar spinal stenosis--a comparative study

BACKGROUND CONTEXT

Walking limitations caused by neurogenic claudication (NC) are typically assessed with self-reported measures, although objective evaluation of walking using motorized treadmill test (MTT) or self-paced walking test (SPWT) has periodically appeared in the lumbar spinal stenosis (LSS) literature.

PURPOSE

This study compared the validity and responsiveness of MTT and SPWT for assessing walking ability before and after common treatments for NC.

STUDY DESIGN

Prospective observational cohort study.

PATIENT SAMPLE

Fifty adults were recruited from an urban spine center if they had LSS and substantial walking limitations from NC and were scheduled to undergo surgery (20%) or conservative treatment (80%).

OUTCOME MEASURES

Walking times, distances, and speeds along with the characteristics of NC symptoms were recorded for MTT and SPWT. Self-reported measures included back and leg pain intensity assessed with 0 to 10 numeric pain scales, disability assessed with Oswestry Disability Index, walking ability assessed with estimated walking times and distances, and NC symptoms assessed with the subscales from the Spinal Stenosis Questionnaires.

METHODS

Motorized treadmill test used a level track, and SPWT was conducted in a rectangular hallway. Walking speeds were self-selected, and test end points were NC, fatigue, or completion of the 30-minute test protocol. Results from MTT and SPWT were compared with each other and self-reported measures. Internal responsiveness was assessed by comparing changes in the initial results with the posttreatment results and external responsiveness by comparing walking test results that improved with those that did not improve by self-reported criteria.

RESULTS

Mean age of the participants was 68 years, and 58% were male. Neurogenic claudication included leg pain (88%) and buttock(s) pain (12%). Five participants could not safely perform MTT. Walking speeds were faster and distances were greater with SPWT, although the results from both tests correlated with each other and self-reported measures. Of the participants, 72% reported improvement after treatment, which was confirmed by significant mean differences in self-reported measures. Motorized treadmill test results did not demonstrate internal responsiveness to change in clinical status after treatment but SPWT results did, with increased mean walking times (6 minutes) and distances (387 m). When responsiveness was assessed against external criterion, both SPWT and MTT demonstrated substantial divergence with self-reported changes in clinical status and alternative outcome measures.

CONCLUSIONS

Both MTT and SPWT can quantify walking abilities in NC. As outcome tools, SPWT demonstrated better internal responsiveness than MTT, but neither test demonstrated adequate external responsiveness. Neither test should be considered as a meaningful substitution for disease-specific measures of function.

Clinical validation study to measure the performance of the Nerve Root Sedimentation Sign for the diagnosis of lumbar spinal stenosis

Lumbar spinal stenosis is a common degenerative disorder of the spine in elderly patients that can be effectively treated with decompression surgery in some patients. Radiological findings in the diagnostic work-up of the patients do not always correlate well with clinical symptoms, and guidance about when to proceed to surgery is inconsistent. The recently described Nerve Root Sedimentation Sign in magnetic resonance scans has been shown to discriminate well between selected patients with and without lumbar spinal stenosis, but the performance of this new test, when used in a broad patient population, is not yet known. We describe the design of a single-centre retrospective chart review to assess the clinical validity of the Sedimentation Sign by evaluating its association with health outcomes in patients with suspected lumbar spinal stenosis. The Sedimentation Sign will be cross-classified with decisions for surgery based on existing tests and patient outcomes in follow-up examinations at 24months. The results will be used to estimate: i) how well the Sedimentation Sign can distinguish between patients that do or do not benefit from surgery, and ii) the concordance between the Sedimentation Sign and existing tests to explore its possible value as a triage test. This study design will provide data to estimate the potential benefits and harms of using the Sedimentation Sign to guide surgical decisions. The observed proportion of discordant test results will help inform the design of future randomised controlled trials of the Sedimentation Sign.

Efficacy of exercise and ultrasound in patients with lumbar spinal stenosis: a prospective randomized controlled trial

Objective: To assess the effectiveness of therapeutic exercises alone and in combination with a single physical agent — ultrasound — in patients with lumbar spinal stenosis.

Design: Randomized, prospective, controlled trial.

Setting: Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, University Hospital.

Subjects: Forty-five patients presenting with symptoms of neurological claudication and magnetic resonance image-proven lumbar spinal stenosis were assigned to one of three groups: ultrasound plus exercise group (group 1, n =15), sham ultrasound plus exercise group (group 2, n= 15) and no exercise — no treatment group (control group, n = 15).

Interventions: Stretching and strengthening exercises for lumbar, abdominal, leg muscles as well as low-intensity cycling exercises were given as therapeutic exercises. Ultrasound was applied with 1 mHz, 1.5 W/cm2 intensity, in continuous mode on the back muscle for 10 minutes in group 1 while ultrasound on/off mode was applied in group 2.

Main outcome measures: Before and after a three-week period, all subjects were evaluated by pain, disability, functional capacity and consumption of analgesic.

Results: Thirty-two of the participants were women and 13 were men, with an average age of 53.2 ± 12.68 years (range 25—82 years). After a three-week treatment period, leg pain decreased in group 1 (—1.47 ± 3.02) and group 2 (—2.47 ± 3.75) compared with the control group (P<0.05). Disability score decreased in group 1 (—3.94 ± 7.20) and group 2 (—7.80 ± 10.26) compared with control group (P<0.05). We did not find any statistically significant difference between groups 1 and 2 (P>0.05). The amount of analgesic consumption is significantly less in the group with ultrasound application compared to that in the control group (P<0.05).

Conclusion: The results of our study suggest that therapeutic exercises are effective for pain and disability in patients with lumbar spinal stenosis and that addition of ultrasound to exercise therapy lowers the analgesic intake substantially.

Nerve root sedimentation sign: evaluation of a new radiological sign in lumbar spinal stenosis

STUDY DESIGN

Retrospective case-referent study.

OBJECTIVE

To assess whether the new sedimentation sign discriminates between nonspecific low back pain (LBP) and symptomatic lumbar spinal stenosis (LSS).

SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA

In the diagnosis of LSS, radiologic findings do not always correlate with clinical symptoms, and additional diagnostic signs are needed. In patients without LSS, we observe the sedimentation of lumbar nerve roots to the dorsal part of the dural sac on supine magnetic resonance image scans. In patients with symptomatic and morphologic central LSS, this sedimentation is rarely seen. We named this phenomenon "sedimentation sign" and defined the absence of sedimenting nerve roots as positive sedimentation sign for the diagnosis of LSS.

METHODS

This study included 200 patients. Patients in the LSS group (n = 100) showed claudication with or without LBP and leg pain, a cross-sectional area <80 mm, and a walking distance <200 m; patients in the LBP group (n = 100) had LBP, no leg pain, no claudication, a cross-sectional area of the dural sac >120 mm, and a walking distance >1000 m. The frequency of a positive sedimentation sign was compared between the 2 groups, and intraobserver and interobserver reliability were assessed in a random subsample (n = 20).

RESULTS

A positive sedimentation sign was identified in 94 patients in the LSS group (94%; 95% confidence interval, 90%-99%) but none in the LBP group (0%; 95% confidence interval, 0%-4%). Reliability was kappa = 1.0 (intraobserver) and kappa = 0.93 (interobserver), respectively. There was no difference in the detection of the sign between segmental levels L1-L5 in the LSS group.

CONCLUSION

A positive sedimentation sign exclusively and reliably occurs in patients with LSS, suggesting its usefulness in clinical practice. Future accuracy studies will address its sensitivity and specificity. If they confirm the sign's high specificity, a positive sedimentation sign can rule in LSS, and, with a high sensitivity, a negative sedimentation sign can rule out LSS.

Lumbar spinal stenosis: prognostic factors for bilateral microsurgical decompression using a unilateral approach

OBJECTIVE

We describe a prospective cohort study that investigated the effectiveness of microsurgical bilateral decompression using unilateral laminotomy for lumbar spinal stenosis and assessed the factors influencing the outcome.

METHODS

A total of 165 consecutive patients underwent decompression for lumbar spinal stenosis. They were divided into 3 age groups: A (<65 years), B (65-75 years), and C (>75 years). Further classification was performed according to body mass index (BMI): BMI 1 (<26), BMI 2 (26-30), and BMI 3 (>30), anesthesiological risk factors (American Society of Anesthesiologists), and the number of levels decompressed. The outcome was monitored by an independent observer at 1 week, 3 months, and 1 year after surgery. The following parameters were evaluated: pain (visual analog scale and analgesic consumption), functional improvement (Neurogenic Claudication Outcome Score), and walking performance, defined as walking distance x speed (treadmill).

RESULTS

One week after surgery, pain decreased in 85.9% of patients, and a comparison of the pre- and postoperative use of analgesics showed that 38% of nonopioid use and 74% of opioid use were discontinued, whereas nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drug consumption increased 13%. One year after surgery, pain remained decreased in 83.9% of patients, Neurogenic Claudication Outcome Score increased in 90.3% of patients, and walking performance improved in 92.2% of patients. BMI greater than 30 was the only negative prognostic factor for pain reduction (P = 0.012) and Neurogenic Claudication Outcome Score improvement (P = 0.019). Surprisingly, patients who underwent multilevel decompression benefitted more from surgery than those who underwent single-level decompression.

CONCLUSION

Microsurgical bilateral decompression using unilateral laminotomy is an effective surgical option for lumbar spinal stenosis, even in high-risk patients with multilevel stenosis.

Step activity monitoring in lumbar stenosis patients undergoing decompressive surgery

Symptomatic degenerative central lumbar spinal stenosis (LSS) is a frequent indication for decompressive spinal surgery, to reduce spinal claudication. No data are as yet available on the effect of surgery on the level of activity measured with objective long-term monitoring. The aim of this prospective, controlled study was to objectively quantify the level of activity in central LSS patients before and after surgery, using a continuous measurement device. The objective data were correlated with subjective clinical results and the radiographic degree of stenosis. Forty-seven patients with central LSS and typical spinal claudication scheduled for surgery were included. The level of activity (number of gait cycles) was quantified for 7 consecutive days using the StepWatch Activity Monitor (SAM). Visual analogue scales (VAS) for back and leg pain, Oswestry disability index and Roland-Morris score were used to assess the patients' clinical status. The patients were investigated before surgery and 3 and 12 months after surgery. In addition, the radiographic extent of central LSS was measured digitally on preoperative magnetic resonance imaging or computed tomography. The following results were found preoperatively: 3,578 gait cycles/day, VAS for back pain 5.7 and for leg pain 6.5. Three months after surgery, the patients showed improvement: 4,145 gait cycles/day, VAS for back pain 4.0 and for leg pain 3.0. Twelve months after surgery, the improvement continued: 4,335 gait cycles/day, VAS for back pain 4.1 and for leg pain 3.3. The clinical results and SAM results showed significant improvement when preoperative data were compared with data 3 and 12 months after surgery. The results 12 months after surgery did not differ significantly from those 3 months after surgery. The level of activity correlated significantly with the degree of leg pain. The mean cross-sectional area of the spinal canal at the central LSS was 94 mm(2). The radiographic results did not correlate either with objective SAM results or with clinical outcome parameters. In conclusion, this study is the first to present objective data on continuous activity monitoring/measurements in patients with central LSS. The SAM could be an adequate tool for performing these measurements in spine patients. Except for leg pain, the objective SAM results did not correlate with the clinical results or with the radiographic extent of central LSS.

Degenerative spondylolisthesis in patients with neurogenic claudication effects functional performance and self-reported quality of life

STUDY DESIGN

The effect of degenerative spondylolisthesis on functional performance and self reported quality of life in patients with lumbar spinal stenosis was compared to patients with lumbar spinal stenosis and no degenerative spondylolisthesis.

OBJECTIVE

To define the relationship degenerative spondylolisthesis shares with functional performance and self reported quality of life in patients with symptomatic lumbar spinal stenosis.

SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA

Neurogenic claudication is a clinical syndrome that reflects symptoms caused by anatomic spinal stenosis. This condition limits functional status and impacts overall health satisfaction. Degenerative spondylolisthesis is one cause of spinal stenosis and is present to different degrees in patients with neurogenic claudication.

METHODS

Thirty-eight women and 39 men diagnosed with lumbar spinal stenosis and neurogenic claudication were prospectively enrolled in the study. All underwent routine, screening side-lying, lateral flexion and extension radiographs. The evaluation included a shuttle walking test, as well as patient self-assessment using the Swiss Spinal Stenosis Questionnaire, and Short Form 36.

RESULTS

The overall walking distance did not differ based on the presence of degenerative spondylolisthesis. No correlation between magnitude of deformity and decreased walking distance was identified. Men walked on average 231.3 m (SD: 159.2) and women walked 251.3 m (SD: 138.4). No statistical difference was noted between men and women and their walking ability (P < 0.56). The Swiss Spinal Stenosis Questionnaire and the Short Form 36 were both strongly correlated with decreased walking ability (P < 0.05).

CONCLUSION

The presence and magnitude of degenerative spondylolisthesis does not correlate with decreased functional capacity. The Swiss Spinal Stenosis Questionnaire and Short Form 36 are accurate in defining the functional status of a patient. Comprehensive evaluation of patients with symptomatic lumbar spinal stenosis using functional assessment and self-assessment questionnaires are helpful in determining the severity of a patient's disability. Plain radiographs may be valuable adjuncts for surgical decision-making, but are not useful in quantifying the degree to which a patient is impaired.

A criterion measure of walking capacity in lumbar spinal stenosis and its comparison with a treadmill protocol

STUDY DESIGN

Measurement (validity) study.

OBJECTIVE

To develop and examine reproducibility of a criterion measure of walking capacity for use with lumbar spinal stenosis (LSS) patients, and use this criterion to examine the validity of a treadmill test for the same purpose.

SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA

To date, there is no criterion measure of walking capacity advocated for use with LSS populations. Treadmill tests of walking have become more common in LSS literature and research, yet there is insufficient evidence to support the use of these tests as valid outcome measures. Therefore, our aim was to develop a criterion measure and to examine the validity of a treadmill protocol for the measurement of walking capacity in LSS.

METHODS

A criterion measure of walking capacity in LSS, the self-paced walking test (SPWT) was developed and its test-retest reproducibility examined. Validity of a treadmill test was then examined using the criterion measure for comparison.

RESULTS

The SPWT was found to be highly reproducible with a test-retest intraclass correlation coefficient of 0.98 for total distance walked, in a sample of subjects diagnosed with LSS (n = 33). Although the treadmill test was found to be highly correlated with the SPWT (r = 0.88), 89% of 45 subjects walked further during the SPWT than on the treadmill. Mean walking distances for the SPWT and treadmill test were 987.3 +/- 913.9 m and 611.3 +/- 666.0 m respectively, resulting in a significant difference (P < 0.05) between SPWT and treadmill tests.

CONCLUSION

The SPWT is presented as a feasible and reproducible criterion measure of walking capacity for use with LSS patients. Although a strong relationship was demonstrated between the treadmill protocol and the SPWT, a systematic bias was observed with patients walking significantly further in the SPWT (36% in mean).

Effectiveness of physical therapy and epidural steroid injections in lumbar spinal stenosis

STUDY DESIGN

Randomized single-blind controlled trial.

OBJECTIVE

We aimed to compare the effects of epidural steroid injections and physical therapy program on pain and function in patients with lumbar spinal stenosis (LSS).

SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA

LSS is one of the most common degenerative spinal disorders among elderly population. Initial treatment of this disabling painful condition is usually conservative including analgesics, nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs, exercise, physical therapy, or epidural steroid injections. Owing to lack of sufficient data concerning the effectiveness of conservative treatment in LSS, we aimed to compare the effectiveness of epidural steroid injections and physical therapy program in a randomized controlled manner.

METHODS

A total of 29 patients diagnosed as LSS were randomized into 3 groups. Group 1 (n = 10) received an inpatient physical therapy program for 2 weeks, group 2 (n = 10) received epidural steroid injections, and group 3 (n = 9) served as the controls. All study patients additionally received diclofenac and a home-based exercise program. The patients were evaluated at baseline, 2 weeks, 1 month, 3 months, and 6 months after treatment by finger floor distance, treadmill walk test, sit-to-stand test, weight carrying test, Roland Morris Disability Index, and Nottingham Health Profile.

RESULTS

Both epidural steroid and physical therapy groups have demonstrated significant improvement in pain and functional parameters and no significant difference was noted between the 2 treatment groups. Significant improvements were also noted in the control group. Pain and functional assessment scores (RMDI, NHP physical activity subscore) were significantly more improved in group 2 compared with controls at the second week.

CONCLUSION

Epidural steroid injections and physical therapy both seem to be effective in LSS patients up to 6 months of follow-up.

The diagnostic value of a treadmill test in predicting lumbar spinal stenosis

Lumbar spinal stenosis is a frequent indication for spinal surgery. The predictive quality of treadmill testing and MRI for diagnostic verification is not yet clearly defined. Aim of the current study was to assess correlations between treadmill testing and MRI findings in the lumbar spine. Twenty-five patients with lumbar spinal stenosis were prospectively examined. Treadmill tests were performed and the area of the dural sac and neuroforamina was examined with MRI for the narrowest spinal segment. VAS and ODI were used for clinical assessment. The median age of the patients was 67 years. In the narrowest spinal segment the median area of the dural sac was 91 mm(2). The median ODI was 66 per cent. The median walking distance in the treadmill test was 70 m. The distance reached in the treadmill test correlated with the area of the dural sac (Spearman's rho = 0.53) and ODI (rho = -0.51), but not with the area of the neuroforamina and VAS. The distance reached in the treadmill test predicts the grade of stenosis in MRI but has a limited diagnostic importance for the level of clinical symptoms in lumbar spinal stenosis.

Loading is more effective than posture in lumbar spinal stenosis: a study with a treadmill equipment

The objective of this study was to assess the correlation between neurogenic intermittent claudication (NIC) in LSS and different positions as well as loading status, using the treadmill device. The study was a prospective clinical trial on lumbar spinal stenosis (LSS) using a treadmill equipment. The study population comprised of 80 LSS patients with a mean age of 61. The equipment included a treadmill, unloading station and loading vests. The patients were instructed to walk in five different positions. The initiation time of symptoms and total walking time were recorded. The examination was stopped after 20 min or at the onset of severe symptoms. In order to obtain pretest demographic data on subjects, visual analog scale, Roland-Morris questionnaire, pain disability index, and Beck depression index were used. The initiation time of symptoms (ITS) and total walking time (TWT) were measured during the test. Unloading provided a longer and loading a shorter ITS and TWT. Decline or incline positions did not affect ITS or TWT. The changes in posture had no correlation with the appearance of symptoms in LSS patients with NIC on a treadmill in this study, rather ITS and TWT were determined by axial loading and unloading.

F wave studies of neurogenic intermittent claudication in lumbar spinal stenosis

OBJECTIVE

Lumbar spinal stenosis (LSS) may result in neurogenic claudication (NC), which is thought to be a result of transient ischemia during exercise. In this study we evaluated the changes in F wave studies before and immediately after walking stress in patients with NC.

DESIGN

Twenty-six patients with LSS who had signs and symptoms of NC and 20 healthy volunteers were included in this study. Routine motor and sensory nerve conduction studies and tibial F wave studies were performed in both groups. Immediately after walking stress test, tibial F wave studies were repeated. Exercise treadmill protocol was used for ambulation. Time to first symptoms and total ambulation time were recorded.

RESULTS

After completion of the baseline electrophysiological examination, a walking stress test was performed using a treadmill, and 16 patients (61.5%) experienced neurogenic claudication during the trial. The mean time to first symptoms was 2.0 +/- 3.5 mins (minimum = 0, maximum = 14). In the control group 18 subjects (90%) completed the trial without any symptoms, and 2 (10%) subjects had to stop at an average of 10 mins because of generalized fatigue. Within 5 mins after the walking stress test, tibial F wave studies were repeated in both groups. There were significant increases in F latency values bilaterally in the patient group (P = 0.001 for both sides) but not in control subjects (P = 0.435 for right side and P = 0.122 for left side).

CONCLUSION

Our data suggest that F wave studies after walking stress test provide more information for the diagnosis of NC.

Comparison of the predictive value of myelography, computed tomography and MRI on the treadmill test in lumbar spinal stenosis

To date, there have been no prospective, objective studies comparing the accuracy of the MRI, myelo-CT and myelography. The purpose of this study is to compare the diagnostic and predictive values of MRIs, myelo-CTs, and myelographies. Myelographies with dynamic motion views, myelo-CTs, MRIs and exercise treadmill tests were performed in 35 cases. The narrowest AP diameter of the dural sac was measured by myelography. At the pathologic level, dural cross-sectional area (D-CSA) was calculated in the MRI and Myelo-CT. The time to the first symptoms (TAF) and the total ambulation time (TAT) were measured during the exercise treadmill test and used as the standard in the comparison of correlation between radiographic parameters and walking capacity. The mean D-CSA by CT was 58.3 mm(2) and 47.6 mm(2) by MRI. All radiographic parameters such as AP diameters and D-CSA have no correlation to TAF or TAT (p > 0.05). Our data showed no statistically significant differences in the correlation of the patients' walking capacity to the severity of stenosis as assessed by myelography, myelo-CT and MRI.

Relationship between ambulation and obesity in older persons with and without low back pain

CONTEXT

For obese older persons, ambulation is both functionally important and a means of weight control. The relationship between weight and ambulation is not known in this population. Also, the extent to which pain interferes with ambulation is not studied.

OBJECTIVE

To examine the relationship between obesity and ambulation, and to determine the effect of pain and body mass index (BMI) on ambulation in older persons.

DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS

Retrospective study of 82 older persons, ages 55-79 y, some with no back pain recruited from the community, others with back pain or spinal stenosis recruited from a magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) scanner as part of a larger university study of spinal stenosis.

OUTCOME MEASURES

Age, Visual Analog Scales for pain, BMI, patient diagnosis (no pain, mechanical back pain, and spinal stenosis), walking velocity and stride length on a 15-min laboratory ambulation test, and 1-week community ambulation measured with a pedometer (steps, distance, and energy expenditure).

RESULTS

BMI had a significant inverse relationship with ambulatory measurements in terms of the distance walked, steps taken, and walking velocity. Pain severity and pain category also had a significant inverse relationship with these measures. A negative correlation was observed between pain and obesity, although the relationship was statistically nonsignificant.

DISCUSSION

Obese older people walked less than the nonobese older people. Pain was associated with decreased ambulation. Clinicians who intend to encourage increased ambulation in older obese persons should consider possible barriers posed by musculoskeletal pain.

Nonsurgical management of patients with lumbar spinal stenosis: a literature review and a case series of three patients managed with physical therapy

This article critically reviews the available literature regarding nonsurgical management for lumbar spinal stenosis (LSS) and presents a case series of three patients managed with manual physical therapy. This case series uses a well-defined, impairment-based, noninvasive, outpatient treatment program for patients with LSS and provides patient-centered, long-term outcome information. The outpatient treatment program focuses on patients' individualized, prioritized impairments identified on initial examination, and emphasizes manual physical therapy techniques targeting each patient's impairments, specific exercises to either reinforce the manual physical therapy treatment or strengthen specific muscles, and a walking program. The results demonstrate that patients with LSS can make significant gains in disability, symptoms, and function in relatively short periods of time and that these gains can be maintained for up to 18 months. Under this physical therapy program, patients experienced significant improvements, and the potential adverse effects of invasive therapies or pharmacologic management strategies, which often are included in other "nonsurgical" treatment programs, were avoided.

A comprehensive study of patients with surgically treated lumbar spinal stenosis with neurogenic claudication

BACKGROUND

The relationship between objective measurements and subjective symptoms of patients with spinal stenosis and the degree of narrowing of the spinal canal is not clear. The purpose of this study was to evaluate patients undergoing surgery for lumbar spinal stenosis and intermittent neurogenic claudication with functional testing, quantitative imaging, and patient self-assessment.

METHODS

Sixty-two patients with lumbar spinal stenosis and neurogenic claudication were prospectively enrolled in the study. All underwent preoperative magnetic resonance imaging and/or computed tomography myelography, and all were treated with decompressive surgery and were followed for a minimum of two years. The evaluation included treadmill and bicycle exercise tests as well as patient self-assessment with use of the Oswestry Disability Index and a visual analog pain scale preoperatively and postoperatively.

RESULTS

Preoperatively fifty-eight (94%) of the patients had a positive result (provocation of symptoms) on the treadmill test and twenty-seven (44%) had a positive result on the bicycle test, whereas postoperatively six and twelve, respectively, had positive results. The mean preoperative scores on the Oswestry Disability Index and visual analog pain scale were 58.4 and 7.1, respectively. Postoperatively, these scores decreased to 21.1 and 2.3, respectively, and both decreases were significant (p < 0.05). Forty-seven (76%) of the patients were seen to have central stenosis on the preoperative imaging studies; forty-one of them had a cross-sectional area of the dural tube of <100 mm (2) at at least one level and twelve had a cross-sectional area of <100 mm (2) at at least two levels.

CONCLUSIONS

A positive treadmill test was consistent with a diagnosis of spinal stenosis and neurogenic claudication in >90% of the patients preoperatively. Following surgical decompression of the lumbar spinal stenosis, more functional improvement was demonstrated by the treadmill test than by the bicycle test. The scores on the Oswestry Disability Index and visual analog pain scale also improved postoperatively. The severity of central canal narrowing at a single level does not appear to limit the postoperative improvement in either functional ability or patient self-assessment. Patients with multilevel central stenosis were, on the average, older and walked a shorter distance preoperatively and postoperatively, although the improvement in their postoperative self-assessment scores was similar to that of patients with single-level stenosis.

The reliability of the Shuttle Walking Test, the Swiss Spinal Stenosis Questionnaire, the Oxford Spinal Stenosis Score, and the Oswestry Disability Index in the assessment of patients with lumbar spinal stenosis

STUDY DESIGN

The Shuttle Walking Test (SWT), the Swiss Spinal Stenosis (SSS) Questionnaire, the Oxford Claudication Score (OCS), and the Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) were administered to patients with lumbar spinal stenosis and neurogenic claudication.

OBJECTIVE

To determine reliability of the SWT, the SSS (Q1-12), the OCS, and the ODI in lumbar spinal stenosis assessment.

SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA

Reliability data for exercise tests in lumbar spinal stenosis are lacking.

METHODS

To determine reliability, 32 clinic patients with lumbar spinal stenosis were assessed twice, with 1 week between assessments. Retrospective data from 17 patients assessed before surgery and 18 months after surgery for lumbar spinal stenosis were used to investigate the use of reliability in a clinical setting.

RESULTS

Test-retest reliability in terms of the intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) was 0.92 for the SWT, 0.92 for the SSS, 0.83 for the OCS and 0.89 for the ODI. The mean percentage scores were 51 for the SSS, 45 for the OCS, and 40 for the ODI. To achieve 95% certainty of change between assessments for a single patient, the SSS would need to change by 15, the OCS by 20, and the ODI by 16. The mean SWT was 150 m, with a change of 76 m required for 95% confidence. Cronbach's alpha was 0.91 for the SSS, 0.90 for the OCS, and 0.89 for the ODI. The change in ODI correlated most strongly with patient satisfaction after surgery (rho = 0.80; P < 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

Fluctuations in a patient's symptoms result in wide individual confidence intervals. Performance on the SSS, OCS, and ODI questionnaires are broadly similar, the most precise being the condition-specific SSS. The SWT gives a snapshot of physical function, which is acceptable for group analysis. Use of the SWT for individual assessment after surgery is feasible.

How does neuropathophysiology affect the signs and symptoms of spinal disease?

A complex relationship exists between back pain and the presence of spinal disease. Particularly in chronic situations, back pain and its behavioural and emotional consequences are as likely to reflect the influence of psychosocial factors as any underlying spinal pathology. Nevertheless, physical factors are clearly important and it is significant that whereas in normal discs only the outer third of the annulus fibrosus is innervated, a much more extensive innervation develops in the presence of degeneration. Inflammation, as evidenced by leukocyte infiltration and expression of inflammatory mediators, is associated with disc degeneration and serves to alter the neural responses resulting in local and referred pain. It is probable that similar inflammatory processes, as well as direct root compression, contribute to radicular symptoms following disc herniation. An appreciation of these mechanisms encourages the search for novel treatments and permits a more rational and effective use of existing strategies for relieving pain.

Functional mobility performance in an elderly population with lumbar spinal stenosis

OBJECTIVES

To compare the functional mobility (FM) of elderly apparently healthy (AH) subjects and patients with lumbar spinal stenosis (LSS) and to evaluate the reliability and validity of the FM tests.

DESIGN

Using the test-retest paradigm, FM performance was assessed in AH subjects. A single FM assessment was conducted on a group of LSS subjects. Between-group performance comparisons were made with the AH subjects and the LSS patients.

SETTING

Orthopedic clinical practice (LSS subjects) and university laboratory (AH subjects).

PARTICIPANTS

Fifty-seven patients seen in an orthopedic clinical practice for LSS and 96 AH subjects who were volunteers identified from among participants of The Lifelong Learning Society at Florida Atlantic University.

INTERVENTIONS

Treadmill walk (TW) test (at 53.6 m/min, 1% increase in grade per min) until 70% of the predicted maximum heart rate was achieved or associated pain made participation uncomfortable. Three trials each of a sit-to-stand (SS, rise from chair as quickly as possible without using arms) and a weight-carrying (WC, walk 20 m as quickly as possible for time carrying 10% of the body weight evenly distributed in hand-held weights) test. The AH group repeated all tests on a separate day.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

Time to walk treadmill, stand from sitting position, walk 20 meters, and analysis of variance between groups.

RESULTS

Significant between-group differences were found for the TW, SS, and WC tests. Test-retest r values of .839 for the TW, .848 for the SS, and .833 for the WC were observed.

CONCLUSIONS

The AH group demonstrated greater FM than the LSS group. The performance disparity between groups may suggest context validity, while the AH groups test-retest stability reflects reliability.

Disorders in trunk rotation during walking in patients with low back pain: a dynamical systems approach

OBJECTIVE

(1) To introduce an evaluation tool for the assessment of walking disorders in low back pain patients. (2) To investigate whether walking patterns in low back pain patients are different from those of control subjects.

DESIGN

Relative phase measures of movement coordination are applied in the assessment of trunk function in a small group of patients with non-specific low back pain and in control subjects.

BACKGROUND

Normal subjects change the coordination of pelvic and thoracic rotations from an in-phase to an out-of-phase pattern with increasing walking speed. Low back pain patients may have a reduced ability to counter rotate pelvis and thorax at higher walking speeds (from 1.0 m/s onwards) as a result of hyperstable coordination patterns.

METHODS

Six patients with non-specific low back pain and six healthy control subjects walked on a treadmill at comfortable walking speeds and during a systematic variation of the treadmill velocity. Coordination of arm and leg movements as well as of pelvic and thoracic rotations was analyzed using a relative phase algorithm.

RESULTS AND CONCLUSIONS

The comfortable walking speed was reduced in the patient group. In contrast to the control subjects, four of the six patients were not able to establish an out-of-phase coordination pattern between thorax and pelvis at higher walking speeds. This coincided with an increased stability of movement coordination, indicating guarded behavior. In addition, an increased asymmetry between the phase-relations of left and right side of the body was found in some of the patients.

Test-retest reproducibility of the exercise treadmill examination in lumbar spinal stenosis

OBJECTIVE

To provide further validation of the treadmill test by assessing its "test-retest" reproducibility.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

In this prospective study, 28 patients with severe lumbar spinal stenosis underwent exercise treadmill testing, first at a walking speed of 1.2 mph and then at the patient's preferred walking speed. All patients had a second treadmill examination or "retest." No treatment intervention was performed between the initial test and the retest. Time to first symptoms (TFS) and total ambulation time (TAT) were measured. Differences between the baseline examination and the retest examination were assessed by using the concordance correlation coefficient (CCC) as well as graphically.

RESULTS

There was good reproducibility between baseline test and retest results for all 4 end points: 1.2 mph, TFS (CCC = 0.90); 1.2 mph, TAT (CCC = 0.89); preferred walking speed, TFS (CCC = 0.98); and preferred walking speed, TAT (CCC = 0.96). The median difference between trials was not significantly different from zero for any of the 4 outcomes.

CONCLUSIONS

Exercise treadmill testing has good test-retest reproducibility. There was no learning phenomenon associated with the test procedure. The study further validates the clinical utility of exercise treadmill testing in patients with lumbar spinal stenosis and neurogenic claudication.

Prospective functional evaluation of the surgical treatment of neurogenic claudication in patients with lumbar spinal stenosis

A prospective evaluation of patients with lumbar spinal stenosis undergoing operative treatment was performed using treadmill-bicycle functional testing as well as Oswestry and Visual Analog Pain scales for self-assessment. Thirty-two patients undergoing spinal stenosis decompression with and without a concomitant spinal fusion were prospectively evaluated, preoperatively and a minimum of 2 years postoperatively. Surgical treatment was demonstrated to produce significant improvement in walking ability, and to a lesser degree, in the ability to bicycle 2 years postoperatively. Improvement in patient function demonstrated on the Oswestry questionnaire correlated with decreased pain observed on the Visual Analog Pain scale. The treadmill-bicycle test appears to be a useful tool for the differential diagnosis of neurogenic claudication and may be used as an objective test of postoperative outcome.

Lumbar spinal stenosis: conservative or surgical management?: A prospective 10-year study

STUDY DESIGN

A cohort of 100 patients with symptomatic lumbar spinal stenosis, characterized in a previous article, were given surgical or conservative treatment and followed for 10 years.

OBJECTIVES

To identify the short- and long-term results after surgical and conservative treatment, and to determine whether clinical or radiologic predictors for the treatment result can be defined.

SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA

Surgical decompression has been considered the rational treatment. However, clinical experience indicates that many patients do well with conservative treatment.

METHODS

In this study, 19 patients with severe symptoms were selected for surgical treatment and 50 patients with moderate symptoms for conservative treatment, whereas 31 patients were randomized between the conservative (n = 18) and surgical (n = 13) treatment groups. Pain was decisive for the choice of treatment group. All patients were observed for 10 years by clinical evaluation and questionnaires. The results, evaluated by patient and physician, were rated as excellent, fair, unchanged, or worse.

RESULTS

After a period of 3 months, relief of pain had occurred in most patients. Some had relief earlier, whereas for others it took 1 year. After a period of 4 years, excellent or fair results were found in half of the patients selected for conservative treatment, and in four fifths of the patients selected for surgery. Patients with an unsatisfactory result from conservative treatment were offered delayed surgery after 3 to 27 months (median, 3.5 months). The treatment result of delayed surgery was essentially similar to that of the initial group. The treatment result for the patients randomized for surgical treatment was considerably better than for the patients randomized for conservative treatment. Clinically significant deterioration of symptoms during the final 6 years of the follow-up period was not observed. Patients with multilevel afflictions, surgically treated or not, did not have a poorer outcome than those with single-level afflictions. Clinical or radiologic predictors for the final outcome were not found. There were no dropouts, except for 14 deaths.

CONCLUSIONS

The outcome was most favorable for surgical treatment. However, an initial conservative approach seems advisable for many patients because those with an unsatisfactory result can be treated surgically later with a good outcome.

Use of patient-centered function and symptom rating systems in spinal disorders

The criteria for assessing patients with disorders of the lumbar spine have historically been subjective and variable. This situation has led to uncertainty about diagnostic criteria, operative indications, and surgical outcome. In an effort to improve the evaluation process, various patient-centered function and symptom rating systems, including questionnaires and functional tests, have recently been developed. This report reviews several of these rating systems and their role in the assessment of patients with back-related symptoms.