Intraoperative electromyography during thoracolumbar spinal surgery

Improved Selectivity in Eliciting Evoked Electromyography Responses With High-Resolution Spinal Cord Stimulation

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES

As spinal cord stimulation (SCS) offers a therapy for increasing numbers of patients with chronic pain and spinal cord injury, it becomes increasingly important to better understand its somatotopy. In this prospective study, we investigate whether high-resolution SCS (HR-SCS) offers improved selectivity assessed through elicitation of evoked electromyography (EMG) responses as compared with commercial paddle leads.

METHODS

Vertical tripole configurations were used to elicit EMG responses in both types of paddles placed for standard-of-care indications between T6 and T10. In HR-SCS, evoked EMG responses in lower extremity/abdominal muscle groups were monitored at 6 to 8 mediolateral sites. All commercial paddle columns were tested. Percentage change in the maximum root mean square value was calculated at a group level. Heat maps were generated to identify responders for each muscle group. Responders were considered patients who had a >50% change in root mean square over baseline.

RESULTS

We demonstrated significantly greater motor responses across medial and lateral contacts and greater responder rates consistently at the T6 and T9 levels with HR-SCS as compared with commercial paddles in 18 patients. Distal muscle groups (gastrocnemius and tibialis anterior) and proximal muscle groups (biceps femoris and quadriceps) were selectively activated at both levels.

CONCLUSION

We demonstrate that HR-SCS has greater selectivity in eliciting evoked EMG responses in an intraoperative setting. HR-SCS offers recruitment of muscle groups at lateral contacts concurrently with medial contacts. We provide data that HR-SCS may provide higher spatial resolution, which has the potential to allow for personalization of care and treatment of pain syndromes/symptoms which to date have not been effectively treated.

The effect of hydroxyapatite on titanium pedicle screw resistance: an electrical model

BACKGROUND CONTEXT

Intraoperative detection of a pedicle wall breach implicitly reduces surgical risk, but the reliability of intraoperative neuromonitoring has been contested. Hydroxyapatite (HA) has been promulgated to increase pedicle screw resistance and negatively influence the accuracy of electromyography.

PURPOSE

The primary purpose of this experiment is to evaluate the effect of HA on pedicle screw electrical resistance using a controlled laboratory model.

STUDY DESIGN

Controlled laboratory study.

METHODS

Stimulation of pedicle screws was performed in normal saline (0.9% NaCl). The experimental group included 8 HA coated (HAC) pedicle screws and matched manufacturer control pedicle screws without HAC (Ti6Al4V). All screws were stimulated at 5, 10-, 15-, 20-, and 25-mm submersion depths. Circuit current return was recorded, and pedicle screw electrical resistance was calculated according to Ohm's Law. Data were assessed for normality and variance. Mann-Whitney U and Kruskal-Wallis tests compared groups with Bonferroni correction for multiple testing. Effect size is reported with 95% confidence intervals (95CI). p values <.05 were considered significant.

RESULTS

Current return was detected for all screws (N=24) following subclinical 8.5 µA stimulation at 5, 10-, 15-, 20-, and 25-mm submersion depths (N=144). The effect estimate of HA on pedicle screw electrical resistance is -0.07 (-0.17 to 0.01 95CI). The estimated effect of HA on pedicle screw electrical resistance did not differ across manufacturers. Electrical resistance values were inversely related to submersion depth. Electrical resistance values were lower in the experimental group at 10 mm (p=.04), 15 mm (p=.04), and 25 mm (p=.02) submersion depths. The HA effect ranged from -0.03 to -0.08 as submersion depth varied.

CONCLUSIONS

We found no evidence that HA increased pedicle screw electrical resistance in a matched manufacturer control laboratory model. Electrical stimulation of pedicle screws may be reliable for pedicle breach detection in the presence of HA. Future research should investigate if laboratory findings translate to clinical practice and confirm that electrical stimulation of pedicle screws is a reliable method to detect pedicle breach in the presence of HA.

EMG monitoring

While most neurophysiologists are familiar with electromyography (EMG) for the purpose of clinical diagnostics, this technique also has a long tradition for neuro-monitoring. In short, intra-operative use of EMG can be divided into stimulated EMG on the one hand and monitoring of the free-running EMG and its spontaneous activity on the other hand. Methods for utilization of stimulated EMG are covered elsewhere in this book. This chapter focuses on the monitoring of spontaneous, or, more correctly, "surgically evoked" EMG. The history and underlying physiologic principles of intra-operative EMG are covered in this chapter as well as a detailed overview of the methodology. Building up from the basis of this background, we describe examples of how EMG can be used to help in intra-operative detection of adverse events and also in the prediction of postoperative outcomes. In the opinion of the authors, EMG should not be used as a "standalone" technique in contemporary neuro-monitoring. Most of its significant potential may be realized when it is used in a complementary way together with other modalities, mainly motor evoked potentials. Bearing this in mind, we sketch out how such a complementary setup may be used for improved neuro-monitoring.

Intraoperative Monitoring for Cauda Equina Tumors: Surgical Outcomes and Neurophysiological Data Accrued Over 10 Years

OBJECTIVE

Cauda equina tumors affect the peripheral nervous system, and the validities of triggered electromyogram (tEMG) and intraoperative neurophysiologic monitoring (IOM) are unclear. We sought to evaluate the accuracy and relevance of tEMG combined with IOM during cauda equina tumor resection.

METHODS

Between 2008 and 2018, an experienced surgeon performed cauda equina tumor resections using tEMG at a single institution. A cauda equina tumor was defined as an intradural-extramedullary or intradural-extradural tumor at the level of L2 or lower. The clinical presentation, extent of resection, pathology, recurrence, postoperative neurological outcomes, and intraoperative tEMG mapping and IOM data were retrospectively analyzed.

RESULTS

One hundred three patients who underwent intraoperative tEMG were included; 38 underwent only tEMG (tEMG-only group), and 65 underwent a combination of tEMG and multimodal IOM (MIOM group). There were no significant differences between the neurologic outcomes, extents of resection, or recurrence rates of the 2 groups. No significant therapeutic benefit was observed; however, the accuracy of intraoperative predetection improved with the combination of IOM and tEMG (accuracy: tEMG-only group, 86.8%; MIOM group, 92.3%). When the involved rootlet was resected despite the positive tEMG result, motor function worsened in 3 of 8 cases. The sensitivity and specificity of tEMG were 37.5% and 94.7%, respectively.

CONCLUSION

tEMG is an essential adjunctive surgical tool for deciding on and planning for rootlet resection. If the tEMG finding is negative, complete resection, involving the rootlet, may be safe. The accuracy may be further improved by using a combination of tEMG and IOM.

Diagnostic Accuracy of Thresholds Less Than or Equal to 8 mA in Pedicle Screw Testing During Lumbar Spine Procedures to Predict New Postoperative Lower Extremity Neurological Deficits

STUDY DESIGN

Retrospective observational study.

OBJECTIVE

It has been shown that pedicle screw stimulation thresholds less than or equal to 8 mA yield a very high diagnostic accuracy of detecting misplaced screws in spinal surgery. In our study, we determined clinical implications of low stimulation thresholds.

SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA

Posterior lumbar spinal fusions (PSF), using pedicle screws, are performed to treat many spinal pathologies, but misplaced pedicle screws can result in new postoperative neurological deficits.

METHODS

Patients with pedicle screw stimulation testing who underwent PSF between 2010 and 2012 at the University of Pittsburgh Medical Center (UPMC) were included in the study. We evaluated the sensitivity, specificity, and diagnostic odds ratio (DOR) to determine how effectively low pedicle screw responses predict new postoperative lower extremity neurological deficits.

RESULTS

One thousand one hundred seventy nine eligible patients underwent 8584 pedicle screw stimulations with lower extremity somatosensory evoked potentials (LE SSEP) monitoring for lumbar fusion surgery. One hundred twenty one of these patients had 187 pedicle screws with a stimulation response at a threshold less than or equal to 8 mA. Smoking had a significant correlation to pedicle screw stimulation less than or equal to 8 mA (P = 0.012). A threshold of less than or equal to 8 mA had a sensitivity/specificity of 0.32/0.90 with DOR of 4.34 [1.83, 10.27] and an area under the ROC curve (AUC) of 0.61 [0.49, 0.74]. Patients with screw thresholds less than or equal to 8 mA and abnormal baselines had a DOR of 9.8 [95% CI: 2.13-45.17] and an AUC of 0.73 [95% CI: 0.50-0.95].

CONCLUSION

Patients with pedicle screw stimulation thresholds less than or equal to 8 mA are 4.34 times more likely to have neurological clinical manifestations. Smoking and LE deficits were shown to be significantly correlated with pedicle screw stimulation thresholds less than or equal to 8 mA. Low stimulation thresholds result in a high specificity of 90%. Pedicle screw stimulation less than or equal to 8 mA can serve as an accurate rule in test for postoperative neurological deficit, warranting reevaluation of screw placement and/or replacement intraoperatively.Level of Evidence: 3.

Diagnostic accuracy of perioperative electromyography in the positioning of pedicle screws in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis treatment: a cross-sectional diagnostic study

Background

To investigate in the conventional techniques of the pedicle screws using triggered screw electromyography (t-EMG), considering different threshold cutoffs: 10, 15, 20 25 mA, for predicting pedicle screw positioning during surgery of the adolescent with idiopathic scoliosis (AIS).

Methods

Sixteen patients (4 males, 12 females, average age 16.6 years) were included, with an average curve magnitude of 50 degrees and placement of 226 pedicle screws. Each screw was classified as “at risk for nerve injury” (ARNI) or “no risk for nerve injury” (NRNI) using CT and the diagnostic accuracy of EMG considering different threshold cutoffs (10,15, 20 and 25 mA) in the axial and Sagittal planes for predicting screw positions ARNI was investigated.

Results

The EMG exam accuracy, in the axial plane, 90.3% screws were considered NRNI. In the sagittal plane, 81% pedicle screws were considered NRNI. A 1-mA decrease in the EMG threshold was associated with a 12% increase in the odds of the screw position ARNI. In the axial and sagittal planes, the ORs were 1.09 and 1.12, respectively. At every threshold cutoff evaluated, the PPV of EMG for predicting screws ARNI was very low in the different threshold cutoff (10 and 15); the highest PPV was 18% with a threshold cutoff of 25 mA. The PPV was always slightly higher for predicting screws ARNI in the sagittal plane than in the axial plane. In contrast, there was a moderate to high NPV (78–93%) for every cutoff analyzed.

Conclusions

EMG had a moderate to high accuracy for positive predicting value screws ARNI with increase threshold cutoffs of 20 and 25 mA. In addition, showed to be effective for minimizing false-negative screws ARNI in the different threshold cutoffs of the EMG in adolescent with idiopathic scoliosis (AIS).

Use of motor evoked potentials during lateral lumbar interbody fusion reduces postoperative deficits

BACKGROUND CONTEXT

Intraoperative neurophysiological monitoring (IONM) has gained rather widespread acceptance as a method to mitigate risk to the lumbar plexus during lateral lumbar interbody fusion (LLIF) surgery. The most common approach to IONM involves using only electromyography (EMG) monitoring, and the rate of postoperative deficit remains unacceptably high. Other test modalities, such as transcranial electric motor-evoked potentials (tcMEPs) and somatosensory-evoked potentials, may be more suitable for monitoring neural integrity, but they have not been widely adopted during LLIF. Recent studies have begun to examine their utility in monitoring LLIF surgery with favorable results.

PURPOSE

This study aimed to evaluate the efficacy of different IONM paradigms in the prevention of iatrogenic neurologic sequelae during LLIF and to specifically evaluate the utility of including tcMEPs in an IONM strategy for LLIF surgery.

STUDY DESIGN/SETTING

A non-randomized, retrospective analysis of 479 LLIF procedures at a single institution over a 4-year period was conducted. During the study epoch, three different IONM strategies were used for LLIF procedures: (1) surgeon-directed T-EMG monitoring ("SD-EMG"), (2) neurophysiologist-controlled T-EMG monitoring ("NC-EMG"), and (3) neurophysiologist-controlled T-EMG monitoring supplemented with MEP monitoring ("NC-MEP").

PATIENT SAMPLE

The patient population comprised 254 men (53.5%) and 221 women (46.5%). Patient age ranged from a minimum of 21 years to a maximum of 89 years, with a mean of 56.6 years.

OUTCOME MEASURES

Physician-documented physiological measures included manual muscle test grading of hip-flexion, hip-adduction, or knee-extension, as well as hypo- or hyperesthesia of the groin or anterolateral thigh on the surgical side. Self-reported measures included numbness or tingling in the groin or anterolateral thigh on the surgical side.

METHODS

Patient progress notes were reviewed from the postoperative period up to 12 months after surgery. The rates of postoperative sensory-motor deficit consistent with lumbar plexopathy or peripheral nerve palsy on the surgical side were compared between the three cohorts.

RESULTS

Using the dependent measure of neurologic deficit, whether motor or sensory, patients with NC-MEP monitoring had the lowest rate of immediate postoperative deficit (22.3%) compared with NC-EMG monitoring (37.1%) and SD-EMG monitoring (40.4%). This result extended to sensory deficits consistent with lumbar plexopathy (pure motor deficits being excluded); patients with NC-MEP monitoring had the lowest rate (20.5%) compared with NC-EMG monitoring (34.3%) and SD-EMG monitoring (36.9%). Additionally, evaluation of postoperative motor deficits consistent with peripheral nerve palsy (pure sensory deficits being excluded) revealed that the NC-MEP group had the lowest rate (5.7%) of motor deficit compared with the SD-EMG (17.0%) and NC-EMG (17.1%) cohorts. Finally, when assessing only those patients whose last follow-up was greater than or equal to 12 months (n=251), the rate of unresolved motor deficits was significantly lower in the NC-MEP group (0.9%) compared with NC-EMG (6.9%) and SD-EMG (11.0%). A comparison of the NC-MEP versus NC-EMG and SD-EMG groups, both independently and combined, was statistically significant (>95% confidence level) for all analyses.

CONCLUSIONS

The results of the present study indicate that preservation of tcMEPs from the adductor longus, quadriceps, and tibialis anterior muscles are of paramount importance for limiting iatrogenic sensory and motor injuries during LLIF surgery. In this regard, the inclusion of tcMEPs serves to compliment EMG and allows for the periodic, functional assessment of at-risk nerves during these procedures. Thus, tcMEPs appear to be the most effective modality for the prevention of both transient and permanent neurologic injury during LLIF surgery. We propose that the standard paradigm for protecting the nervous system during LLIF be adapted to include tcMEPs.

Utility of Intraoperative Neuromonitoring for Lumbar Pedicle Screw Placement Is Questionable: A Review of 9957 Cases

STUDY DESIGN

A retrospective database study.

OBJECTIVE

The goal of this study was to (1) evaluate the trends in the use of electromyography (EMG) for instrumented posterolateral lumbar fusions (PLFs) in the United States and (2) assess the risk of neurological injury following PLFs with and without EMG.

SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA

Neurologic injuries from iatrogenic pedicle wall breaches during screw placement are known complications of PLFs. The routine use of intraoperative neuromonitoring (ION) such as EMG during PLF to improve the accuracy and safety of pedicle screw implantation remains controversial.

METHODS

A retrospective review was performed using the PearlDiver Database to identify patients who had PLF surgery with and without EMG for lumbar disorders from years 2007 to 2015. Patients undergoing concomitant interbody fusions or spinal deformity surgery were excluded. Demographic trends and risk of neurological injuries were assessed.

RESULTS

During the study period, 2007 to 2015, 9957 patients underwent PLFs. Overall, EMG was used in 2495 (25.1%) of these patients. There was a steady increase in the use of EMG from 14.9% in 2007 to 28.7% in 2009, followed by a steady decrease to 21.9% in 2015 (P < 0.0001). The risk of postoperative neurological injuries following PLFs was 1.35% (134/9957) with a risk of 1.36% (34/2495) with EMG and 1.34% (100/7462) without EMG (P = 0.932). EMG is used most commonly for PLFs in the Southern part of the United States.

CONCLUSION

In this retrospective national database review, we found that there was a steady increase in the routine use of EMG for PLFs followed by a steady decline. Regional differences were observed in the utility of EMG for PLFs. The risk of neurological complications following PLF in the absence of spinal deformity is low and the routine use of EMG for PLF may not decrease the risk.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

4.

ELECTROMYOGRAPHY AND INSTRUMENTATION IN PATIENTS WITH IDIOPATHIC SCOLIOSIS

ABSTRACT Objective: The objective of this study is to relate the use of intraoperative electromyography with surgical time, proper placement of screws, type of curve and time spent per screw in idiopathic scoliosis correction surgery in a group of surgeons from Belo Horizonte. This study used the database of protocol evaluation of patients operated in the service, and separately analyzed the results of motor and somatosensory potentials. Methods: Retrospective study of 80 patients undergoing surgery for correction of idiopathic scoliosis between December 2008 and January 2015. A single group of Belo Horizonte spine surgeons performed the intraoperative electromyographic (EMG) monitoring. EMG was performed with stimulation of pedicle screws in patients undergoing instrumentation with pedicle screws as fixation elements. Results: The sample consisted of 85% females (mean age 17 years) and 37.5% of cases had classification type 1AN of Lenke. Of the total surgical cases, 60% had EMG changes. Of the total cases analyzed, 66.3% were true positives for the result. Conclusion: Intraoperative monitoring with EMG is a very important tool for the surgical treatment of patients with scoliosis undergoing instrumentation with pedicle screws. It enables to check if the screw is located on the correct path, helping to decrease the error rate and providing corrections to the surgical approach through a change of strategies. Moreover, it contributes to decrease the time to screw positioning and the total surgical time.

The influence of depth of anesthesia on motor evoked potential response during awake craniotomy

OBJECTIVE

Motor evoked potentials (MEPs) are a critical indicator for monitoring motor function during neurological surgery. In this study, the influence of depth of anesthesia on MEP response was assessed.

METHODS

Twenty-eight patients with brain tumors who underwent awake craniotomy were included in this study. From a state of deep anesthesia until the awake state, MEP amplitude and latency were measured using 5-train electrical bipolar stimulations on the same site of the precentral gyrus each minute during the surgery. The depth of anesthesia was evaluated using the bispectral index (BIS). BIS levels were classified into 7 stages: < 40, and from 40 to 100 in groups of 10 each. MEP amplitude and latency of each stage were compared. The deviation of the MEP measurements, which was defined as a fluctuation from the average in every BIS stage, was also considered.

RESULTS

A total of 865 MEP waves in 28 cases were evaluated in this study. MEP amplitude was increased and latency was decreased in accordance with the increases in BIS level. The average MEP amplitudes in the > 90 BIS level was approximately 10 times higher than those in the < 40 BIS level. Furthermore, the average MEP latencies in the > 90 BIS level were 1.5–3.1 msec shorter than those in the < 60 BIS level. The deviation of measured MEP amplitudes in the > 90 BIS level was significantly stabilized in comparison with that in the < 60 BIS level.

CONCLUSIONS

MEP amplitude and latency were closely correlated with depth of anesthesia. In addition, the deviation in MEP amplitude was also correlated with depth of anesthesia, which was smaller during awake surgery (high BIS level) than during deep anesthesia. Therefore, MEP measurement would be more reliable in the awake state than under deep anesthesia.

Positioning of pedicle screws in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis using electromyography

<sec><title>OBJECTIVE:</title><p> To analyze the occurrence of poor positioning of pedicle screws inserted with the aid of intraoperative electromyographic stimulation in the treatment of Adolescent Idiopathic Scoliosis (AIS).</p></sec><sec><title>METHODS:</title><p> This is a prospective observational study including all patients undergoing surgical treatment for AIS, between March and December 2013 at a single institution. All procedures were monitored by electromyography of the inserted pedicle screws. The position of the screws was evaluated by assessment of postoperative CT and classified according to the specific AIS classification system.</p></sec><sec><title>RESULTS:</title><p> Sixteen patients were included in the study, totalizing 281 instrumented pedicles (17.5 per patient). No patient had any neurological deficit or complaint after surgery. In the axial plane, 195 screws were found in ideal position (69.4%) while in the sagittal plane, 226 screws were found in ideal position (80.4%). Considering both the axial and the sagittal planes, it was observed that 59.1% (166/281) of the screws did not violate any cortical wall.</p></sec><sec><title>CONCLUSION:</title><p> The use of pedicle screws proved to be a safe technique without causing neurological damage in AIS surgeries, even with the occurrence of poor positioning of some implants.</p></sec>

Patient-centered care model in IONM: a review and commentary

Both remote monitoring and nearby/available care models depend on waveform telemetry (a limited form of telemedicine) during intraoperative neurophysiological monitoring (IONM). These dominant models neither mandate preoperative patient contact nor assume co-practitioner collegiality. This review and commentary argues in favor of a routine, normative relationship between the patient and the IONM physician/professional (IONM-P). Similarly, normal collegial relations should be established and maintained over time between the IONM-P and fellow co-practitioners (the proceduralist and the anesthesiologist). This professional practice "upgrade" places the IONM-P in a much stronger bioethical position among peers (and third party reviewers of the field and its practices). This "upgrade" also improves the likelihood that correct context-driven decisions will be made by the co-practitioners (IONM-P, proceduralist, and anesthesiologist) during complex multimodality monitoring. Most current models of IONM can be accommodated by readily available telemedicine-mediated videoconferencing. Several lines of argument are used to support this "patient-centered care model" of IONM.

A CT-based study investigating the relationship between pedicle screw placement and stimulation threshold of compound muscle action potentials measured by intraoperative neurophysiological monitoring

PURPOSE

Neurophysiological monitoring aims to improve the safety of pedicle screw placement, but few quantitative studies assess specificity and sensitivity. In this study, screw placement within the pedicle is measured (post-op CT scan, horizontal and vertical distance from the screw edge to the surface of the pedicle) and correlated with intraoperative neurophysiological stimulation thresholds.

METHODS

A single surgeon placed 68 thoracic and 136 lumbar screws in 30 consecutive patients during instrumented fusion under EMG control. The female to male ratio was 1.6 and the average age was 61.3 years (SD 17.7). Radiological measurements, blinded to stimulation threshold, were done on reformatted CT reconstructions using OsiriX software. A standard deviation of the screw position of 2.8 mm was determined from pilot measurements, and a 1 mm of screw-pedicle edge distance was considered as a difference of interest (standardised difference of 0.35) leading to a power of the study of 75 % (significance level 0.05).

RESULTS

Correct placement and stimulation thresholds above 10 mA were found in 71 % of screws. Twenty-two percent of screws caused cortical breach, 80 % of these had stimulation thresholds above 10 mA (sensitivity 20 %, specificity 90 %). True prediction of correct position of the screw was more frequent for lumbar than for thoracic screws.

CONCLUSION

A screw stimulation threshold of >10 mA does not indicate correct pedicle screw placement. A hypothesised gradual decrease of screw stimulation thresholds was not observed as screw placement approaches the nerve root. Aside from a robust threshold of 2 mA indicating direct contact with nervous tissue, a secondary threshold appears to depend on patients' pathology and surgical conditions.

Non-invasive high voltage electrical stimulation as a monitoring tool of nerve root function in lumbosacral surgery

OBJECTIVE

To verify the safety and clinical use of non-invasive high-voltage electrical stimulation (HVES) in patients with compressive radiculopathy. To test the feasibility of HVES to survey nerve root function during lumbosacral surgery.

METHODS

In 20 patients undergoing lumbosacral surgery for degenerative spinal diseases, compound muscle action potentials (CMAPs) evoked by maximal HVES were bilaterally recorded throughout surgery from L3 to S2 radicular territories. A preliminary study was performed in awake patients to rule out detrimental effects caused by HVES.

RESULTS

Preoperative study confirmed the safety of HVES. Unexpectedly, a transient but significant remission of pain was observed after root stimulation. Intraoperative monitoring (IOM) was accomplished in all patients. HVES never hindered surgical procedures and never caused mechanical damage within the operatory field. In 4 patients acute, highly focal and reversible conduction failure was promptly detected by HVES in radicular territories congruent with the root manipulated at that moment.

CONCLUSIONS

HVES is a safe and sensitive tool to monitor nerve root function in lumbosacral surgery.

SIGNIFICANCE

The method is based on the assumption that any acute conduction failure occurring during surgery can be immediately and unambiguously detected by HVES if root stimulation is supramaximal and delivered rostral to the surgical level.

Intraoperative decrease in amplitude of somatosensory-evoked potentials of the lower extremities with interbody fusion cage placement during lumbar fusion surgery

STUDY DESIGN

A retrospective analysis was performed.

OBJECTIVE

To characterize neurophysiological data of patients who had a decrease in amplitude of somatosensory-evoked potentials (SSEP) of the lower extremities secondary to interbody fusion cage placement during lumbar fusion surgery with no alert of the electromyography (EMG).

SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA

The most consistently used and studied modalities of neurophysiological monitoring during spine surgery are SSEPs, motor-evoked potentials (MEPs), and EMG. In general, it is accepted that MEPs along with SSEPs are used to detect spinal cord injury and EMGs are used to detect nerve root injury.

METHODS

The medical records of a consecutive series of 115 patients who had undergone a transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (TLIF) procedure in which SSEPs, MEPs, and EMGs were utilized for neurophysiological monitoring were retrospectively reviewed.

RESULTS

One hundred fifteen cases of TLIF procedures were reviewed. The follow-up was 2 years after the last procedure. A total of 5 cases that demonstrated intraoperative SSEP changes were found. The age range for these cases was from 39 to 81 years (mean age, 61 yr). All 5 patients developed SSEP changes that were secondary to interbody fusion cage placement. All 5 cases demonstrated reversal of the SSEP changes to baseline after removal of the interbody cage. Three of these cases had no new postoperative neurological findings. However, given that these 3 cases of SSEP change were associated with a surgical event that improved secondary to an intervention (in this case removal of the interbody cage), those cases were classified as presumed positive. Two of the 5 cases were in fact associated with a new postoperative neurological deficit.

CONCLUSION

To our knowledge this study demonstrates the first reported SSEP alerts that were associated with a posterior lumbar interbody cage placement without a corresponding EMG alert.

Neurophysiologic monitoring of the spinal accessory nerve, hypoglossal nerve, and the spinomedullary region

This review of hypoglossal nerve, spinal accessory nerve, and spinomedullary region intraoperative monitoring details pertinent central and extramedullary anatomy, an updated understanding of proper free-run EMG recording methods and recent developments in stimulation technique and instrumentation. Mapping and monitoring the floor of the fourth ventricle, especially the vagal/hypoglossal trigone region, are emphasized. Although cranial nerve transcranial electrical motor evoked potential recordings can afford appreciation of corticobulbar/corticospinal tract function and secure a more dependable measure of proximate extramedullary somatoefferents, the sometimes difficult implementation and the, as yet, unresolved alert criteria of these recordings demand critical appraisal. Nearby and intimately associated cardiochronotropic and barocontrol neural networks are described; their better understanding is recommended as an important adjunct to "routine" neural monitoring. Finally, an Illustrative case is presented to highlight the many strengths and weaknesses of "state of the art" lower cranial nerve/spinomedullary region monitoring.

Ability of electromyographic monitoring to determine the presence of malpositioned pedicle screws in the lumbosacral spine: analysis of 2450 consecutively placed screws

Object

Pedicle screws provide efficient stabilization along all 3 columns of the spine, but they can be technically demanding to place, with malposition rates ranging from 5% to 10%. Intraoperative electromyographic (EMG) monitoring has the capacity to objectively identify a screw breaching the medial pedicle cortex that is in proximity to a nerve root. The purpose of this study is to describe and evaluate the authors' 7-year institutional experience with intraoperative EMG monitoring during placement of lumbar pedicle screws and to determine the clinical utility of intraoperative EMG monitoring.

Methods

The authors retrospectively studied 2450 consecutive lumbar pedicle screws placed in 418 patients from June 2002 through June 2009. All screws were inserted using a free-hand technique and anatomical landmarks, stimulated at 10.0 mA, and evaluated with CT scanning within 48 hours postoperatively. Medial pedicle screw breach was defined as having greater than 25% of the screw diameter extend outside of the pedicle, as confirmed on CT scanning or intraoperatively by a positive EMG response indicating a medial breach. The sensitivity and specificity of intraoperative EMG monitoring in detecting the presence of a medial screw breach was evaluated based on the following definitions: 1) true positive (a positive response to EMG stimulation confirmed as a breach intraoperatively or on postoperative CT scans); 2) false positive (positive response to EMG stimulation confirmed as a correctly positioned screw on postoperative CT scans); 3) true negative (no response to EMG stimulation confirmed as a correctly positioned screw on postoperative CT scans); or 4) false negative (no response to EMG stimulation but confirmed as a breach on postoperative CT scans).

Results

One hundred fifteen pedicle screws (4.7%) showed positive stimulation during intraoperative EMG monitoring. At stimulation thresholds less than 5.0, 5.0–8.0, and > 8.0 mA, the specificity of a positive response was 99.9%, 97.9%, and 95.9%, respectively. The sensitivity of a positive response at these thresholds was only 43.4%, 69.6%, and 69.6%, respectively. At a threshold less than 5.0 mA, 91% of screws with a positive EMG response were confirmed as true medial breaches. However, at thresholds of 5.0–8.0 mA or greater than 8.0 mA, a positive EMG response was associated with 89% and 100% false positives (no breaches), respectively.

Conclusions

When using intraoperative EMG monitoring, a positive response at screw stimulation thresholds less than 5.0 mA was highly specific for a medial pedicle screw breach but was poorly sensitive. A positive response to stimulation thresholds greater 5.0 mA was associated with a very high rate of false positives. The authors' experience suggests that pedicle screws showing positive stimulation below 5.0 mA warrants intraoperative investigation for malpositioning while responses at higher thresholds are less reliable at accurately representing a medial breach.

Recording triggered EMG thresholds from axillary chest wall electrodes: a new refined technique for accurate upper thoracic (T2-T6) pedicle screw placement

This study was aimed at evaluating the sensitivity and safety of a new technique to record triggered EMG thresholds from axillary chest wall electrodes when inserting pedicle screws in the upper thoracic spine (T2-T6). A total of 248 (36.6%) of a total of 677 thoracic screws were placed at the T2-T6 levels in 92 patients with adolescent idiopathic scoliosis. A single electrode placed at the axillary midline was able to record potentials during surgery from all T2-T6 myotomes at each side. Eleven screws were removed during surgery because of malposition according to intraoperative fluoroscopic views. Screw position was evaluated after surgery in the remaining 237 screws using a CT scan. Malposition was detected in 35 pedicle screws (14.7%). Pedicle medial cortex was breached in 24 (10.1%). Six screws (2.5%) were located inside the spinal canal. Mean EMG threshold was 24.44 ± 11.30 mA in well-positioned screws, 17.98 ± 8.24 mA (p < 0.01) in screws violating the pedicle medial cortex, and 10.38 ± 3.33 mA (p < 0.005) in screws located inside the spinal canal. Below a threshold of 12 mA, 33.4% of the screws (10/30) were malpositioned. Furthermore, 36% of the pedicle screws with t-EMG stimulation thresholds within the range 6-12 mA were malpositioned. In conclusion, assessment of upper thoracic pedicle screw placement by recording tEMG at a single axillary electrode was highly reliable. Thresholds below 12 mA should alert surgeons to suspect screw malposition. This technique simplifies tEMG potential recording to facilitate safe placement of pedicle screws at upper thoracic levels.

Electromyographic monitoring and its anatomical implications in minimally invasive spine surgery

STUDY DESIGN

Literature review.

OBJECTIVE

The objective of this article is to examine current intraoperative electromyography (EMG) neurophysiologic monitoring methods and their application in minimally invasive techniques. We will also discuss the recent application of EMG and its anatomic implications to the minimally invasive lateral transpsoas approach to the spine.

SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA

Minimally invasive techniques require that the same goals of surgery be achieved, with the hope of decreased morbidity to the patient. Unlike standard open procedures, direct visualization of the anatomy is decreased. To increase the safety of minimally invasive spine surgery, neurophysiological monitoring techniques have been developed.

METHODS

Review of the literature was performed using the National Center for Biotechnology Information databases using PUBMED/MEDLINE. All articles in the English language discussing the use of intraoperative EMG monitoring and minimally invasive spine surgery were reviewed. The role of EMG monitoring in special reference to the minimally invasive lateral transpsoas approach is also described.

RESULTS

In total, 76 articles were identified that discussed the role of neuromonitoring in spine surgery. The majority of articles on EMG and spine surgery discuss the use of intraoperative neurophysiological monitoring (IOM) for safe and accurate pedicle screw placement. In general, there is a paucity of literature that pertains to intraoperative EMG neuromonitoring and minimally invasive spine surgery. Recently, EMG has been used during minimally invasive lateral transpsoas approach to the lumbar spine for interbody fusion. The addition of EMG to the lateral approach has contributed to decrease the complication rate from 30% to less than 1%.

CONCLUSION

In minimally invasive approaches to the spine, the use of EMG IOM might provide additional safety, such as percutaneous pedicle screw placement, where visualization is limited compared with conventional open procedures. In addition to knowledge of the anatomy and image guidance, directional EMG IOM is crucial for safe passage through the psoas muscle during the minimally invasive lateral retroperitoneal approach.

Monitoração intraoperatória com teste de estimulação eletromiográfica dos instrumentais de pacientes submetidos à correção cirúrgica de escoliose idiopática

OBJETIVO: apresentar a metodologia empregada na monitoração neurofisiológica de pacientes submetidos a tratamento para correção de escoliose idiopática com instrumentação cirúrgica, utilizando parafusos pediculares torácicos e lombares. MÉTODOS: foram estudados, retrospectivamente, 32 prontuários de pacientes operados no Serviço de Cirurgia da Coluna Vertebral do Instituto da Coluna,Jundiaí, São Paulo, entre os anos de 2004 e 2008. A idade variou de 11 a 18 anos, e a maioria era do sexo feminino (93,75%). RESULTADOS: verificou-se que em seis pacientes houve relação entre a incidência de positividade no teste com estimulação eletromiográfica dos instrumentais e mau posicionamento dos parafusos pediculares, sem evidências de complicações após correção dos mesmos. CONCLUSÃO: os resultados confirmam a eficácia da monitoração intraoperatória.

Intraoperative neurophysiological monitoring during spine surgery: a review

Spinal surgery involves a wide spectrum of procedures during which the spinal cord, nerve roots, and key blood vessels are frequently placed at risk for injury. Neuromonitoring provides an opportunity to assess the functional integrity of susceptible neural elements during surgery. The methodology of obtaining and interpreting data from various neuromonitoring modalities-such as somatosensory evoked potentials, motor evoked potentials, spontaneous electromyography, and triggered electromyography-is reviewed in this report. Also discussed are the major benefits and limitations of each modality, as well as the strength of each alone and in combination with other modalities, with regard to its sensitivity, specificity, and overall value as a diagnostic tool. Finally, key clinical recommendations for the interpretation and step-wise decision-making process for intervention are discussed. Multimodality neuromonitoring relies on the strengths of different types of neurophysiological modalities to maximize the diagnostic efficacy in regard to sensitivity and specificity in the detection of impending neural injury. Thorough knowledge of the benefits and limitations of each modality helps in optimizing the diagnostic value of intraoperative monitoring during spinal procedures. As many spinal surgeries continue to evolve along a pathway of minimal invasiveness, it is quite likely that the value of neuromonitoring will only continue to become more prominent.

Relative efficacy of transcranial motor evoked potentials, mechanically-elicited electromyography, and evoked EMG to assess nerve root function during sustained retraction in a porcine model

STUDY DESIGN

This is an animal experiment using transcranial motor evoked potentials (TcMEP), mechanically elicited electromyography (EMG), and evoked EMG during spinal nerve root retraction in a pig model.

OBJECTIVE

To compare the sensitivity of these 3 electrophysiological measures for a constant retraction force applied to an isolated lumbar nerve root for a specific duration of time.

SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA

The incidence of nerve root injury during lumbar spine surgery ranges from 0.2% to 31%. Direct retraction of spinal nerve roots may cause these injuries, but the amount and duration of force that may safely be applied is not clear. Using an established porcine model, we examined the changes occurring to multimyotomal TcMEPs, mechanically elicited EMGs, and evoked EMGs during continuous retraction of a nerve root at a constant force applied over 10 minutes.

METHODS

TcMEP, mechanically elicited EMG, and evoked EMG responses were recorded from the tibialis anterior (TA) muscle in 10 experiments. The dominant root innervating the TA was determined with evoked EMG; preretraction TcMEP and nerve root stimulation threshold (NRT) was obtained. The dominant root was retracted at 2 Newton (N) for 10 minutes. TcMEP trials were elicited every minute during retraction. NRT was measured immediately after retraction. TcMEP and NRT were measured after 10 minutes of recovery. RESULTS.: During the 10 minutes of retraction at 2 N, the amplitude of the TA muscle progressively decreased in all trials in a highly significant curvilinear fashion. The mean TcMEP amplitude decreased 59% +/- 14% from baseline values. The mean NRT after 10 minutes of retraction at 2 N rose to 1.8 +/- 0.7 mA (P < 0.01 vs. baseline). The NRT increase after retraction strongly correlated with the decrease in motor evoked potentials amplitude in the TA (R = 0.90, P < 0.001). EMG activity was variable; tonic EMG was observed in only 2 nerve roots (20%).

CONCLUSION

Three electrophysiologic methods were used intraoperatively to assess neural function during retraction of a single nerve root. Retraction produced consistent changes in TcMEPs and evoked EMG. These 2 methods show promise for assessing the limits on the force and duration of nerve root retraction during spine surgery. Mechanically elicited EMG was not sensitive to the amount and duration of nerve root retraction.

Electrophysiologic monitoring in neurosurgery

Electrophysiologic techniques have become common in the neurosurgical operating room. This article reviews the methods used for mapping neural structures or monitoring during surgery. Mapping methods allow identification of target structures for surgery, or for identifying structures to allow avoidance or plot safe pathways to deeper structures. Monitoring methods allow for surgery on nearby structures to warn of encroachment, thereby reducing unwanted injury.

Automated intraoperative EMG testing during percutaneous pedicle screw placement

BACKGROUND

EMG screw testing has been shown to be sensitive and reliable in open spinal instrumentation cases. However, there is little evidence to show its applicability to percutaneous screw placement.

PURPOSE

To demonstrate the utility of EMG testing in percutaneous techniques, where lack of direct visualization poses an added risk to nerve injury.

STUDY DESIGN

Summary of intraoperative EMG results during percutaneous pedicle screw placement.

METHODS

Percutaneous pedicle screws were placed in twenty patients (22 levels, 88 pedicles). The initial fluoroscopically-guided k-wires and the subsequent taps were insulated and stimulated via an automated EMG system. Low threshold values prompted repositioning of the pedicle trajectory.

RESULTS

Four (5%) k-wires induced EMG thresholds less than 10mA, prompting repositioning. One was repositioned without improvement, but with improvement upon tapping. One k-wire with very low threshold (3mA) was repositioned with an improved result (13mA). In 78 pedicles (89%) the tap threshold was greater than the k-wire.

CONCLUSIONS

EMG testing helps to identify suboptimal screw trajectories, allowing for early adjustment and confirmation of improved placement. Tapping often improved thresholds, perhaps by compressing the bone and creating a denser, more insulative pedicle wall. EMG testing may improve the safety of percutaneous screw techniques, where the pedicle cannot be visually inspected.

The effects of isoflurane and propofol on intraoperative neurophysiological monitoring during spinal surgery

OBJECTIVES

To compare the effects of isoflurane and propofol on intraoperative neurophysiological monitoring (IONM) during spinal surgery.

METHODS

Thirty-five patients were randomly assigned to receive isoflurane (n = 17) or propofol (n = 18) anesthesia. Somatosensory evoked potentials (SEPs) following posterior tibial nerve stimulation were recorded before induction as baselines. Isoflurane concentrations and propofol infusions were adjusted to obtain four pre-determined BIS ranges: 65-55, 55-45, 45-35 and 35-25. For each range, a stable state was maintained for at least 10 min to perform IONM. The SEP latency P40 and amplitude P40-N50, the onset latency and amplitude of transcranial motor evoked potentials (tcMEPs), and threshold intensity of triggered electromyographic activity (EMG) following pedicle screw stimulation were statistically analyzed.

RESULTS

Compared with baseline values, P40 latency increased and P40-N50 amplitude decreased after anesthesia with isoflurane or propofol. Isoflurane caused a dose-dependent depression of SEPs, but propofol did not. TcMEPs were recordable and stable in all patients receiving propofol in each BIS range, but only recordable in 10 (58.8%) receiving isoflurane with BIS >55, and 3 (17.8%) with BIS <55. No difference was noted in triggered EMG.

CONCLUSIONS

Isoflurane inhibited IONM more than propofol. Propofol is recommended for critical spinal surgery, particularly when motor pathway function is monitored.

Intraoperative electromyography

Intraoperative electromyography (EMG) provides useful diagnostic and prognostic information during spine and peripheral nerve surgeries. The basic techniques include free-running EMG, stimulus-triggered EMG, and intraoperative nerve conduction studies. These techniques can be used to monitor nerve roots during spine surgeries, the facial nerve during cerebellopontine angle surgeries, and peripheral nerves during brachial plexus exploration and repair. However, there are a number of technical limitations that can cause false-positive or false-negative results, and these must be recognized and avoided when possible. The author reviews these basic electrophysiologic techniques, how they are applied to specific surgical situations, and their limitations.

Intraoperative electromyographic monitoring during periacetabular osteotomy

Periacetabular osteotomy has become the procedure of choice in many centers for the treatment of symptomatic hip dysplasia. Intraoperative real-time nerve monitoring has been advocated during acetabular fracture repair and complex total hip arthroplasties to prevent iatrogenic sciatic nerve injury. To the authors' knowledge there is no information concerning the use of intraoperative electromyographic monitoring during periacetabular osteotomy. The purpose of the current study was to investigate the use of intraoperative continuous electromyographic monitoring during periacetabular osteotomy in a relatively large consecutive series of patients as a mechanism to prevent nerve injury during surgery and as a prognostic indicator of neurologic function after periacetabular osteotomy. From September 1992 to July 1999, 140 consecutive periacetabular osteotomies were done in 127 patients at the authors' institution. There were 96 females and 31 males, with an average age of 32 years at the time of surgery. All patients had intraoperative electromyographic monitoring of femoral and sciatic innervated muscles. All patients were followed up for a minimum of 1 year, until complete resolution of neurologic deficits, or both. Thirty-six patients (26%) had abnormal electromyographic activity recorded during surgery. Seven patients (5%) had peroneal nerve deficits postoperatively including extensor hallucis longus and tibialis anterior weakness with loss of sensation in the first web space. Abnormal electromyographic activity was observed intraoperatively in five of the seven patients with postoperative deficits. Six of the seven injuries resolved completely. One patient with intraoperative electromyographic activity (0.7%) had a postoperative foot drop that persisted for greater than 1 year. There were no femoral, tibial, or obturator nerve deficits observed. Electromyographic monitoring appears to provide prediction of postoperative neurologic deficit.

A new method for detecting pedicular wall perforation during pedicle screw insertion

STUDY DESIGN

Sensitivity, specificity, and predictive value analyses of a method that can be used to detect pedicular wall perforation during pedicle screw insertion were assessed.

OBJECTIVE

To determine the accuracy of observing the fatty material expelled during pedicle screw insertion for detecting pedicular wall perforations.

SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA

Although many methods for safe and accurate insertion of a pedicle screw are described, the rates of misplacement still are high, and complications may occur from improper placement of pedicle screws. Computer-assisted insertion techniques are reported to be very accurate, but these techniques are not yet commonly available.

METHODS

In this study, 74 pedicle screw insertions were observed for the material expelled after drilling for the pedicle screw. The outflows of blood and fatty particles were recorded separately. The position of the pedicle screws after surgery was verified by computed tomography. The specificity, sensitivity, positive and negative predictive values, and kappa statistics were assessed.

RESULTS

Visible fatty particles were observed during 51 pedicle screw insertions. The histologic analysis showed that the fatty particles were coming from the bone marrow of the corpus. For the observation of fatty particles in detecting perforations along the pedicle screw pathway, the specificity was 98%, the sensitivity 73%, the positive predictive value 84%, the negative predictive value 95%, and the kappa statistic 0.74.

CONCLUSIONS

The observation of fatty particles in the blood that comes out after drilling for the pedicle screw may indicate that there is no perforation along the pedicle screw pathway. The observation is easy to perform and does not require any special instruments. Therefore, it can be used alone or in combination with other methods to improve the accuracy of pedicle screw insertion.

The use of evoked EMG in detecting misplaced thoracolumbar pedicle screws

STUDY DESIGN

Experimental study performed using an animal model.

OBJECTIVES

To determine if EMG responses generated by the electrical stimulation of thoracolumbar pedicle screws could be used to predict the screw position.

SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA

Evoked EMG has been used successfully to predict pedicle screw position in the lumbar spine. No data have been published on its effectiveness in the thoracic spine.

METHODS

A total of 91 screws were inserted into the pedicles from T8 to L2 in six sheep. Monitoring electrodes were placed into transversus abdominus at three levels, the lower two intercostal spaces, and into psoas. A constant voltage stimulus was applied to a probe inserted into each pedicle, and then to each pedicle screw after it had replaced the probe. The threshold voltage required to evoke EMG activity in the relevant myotome was noted. After monitoring the position of each screw was determined by gross dissection.

RESULTS

EMG responses in abdominal and intercostal muscles were successfully evoked by thoracic pedicle screw stimulation. Of the 91 screws, 50 were within the pedicle and required an average voltage of 15.12 V to stimulate an EMG response, compared with the 41 misplaced screws that had an average voltage of 7.63 V (P < 0.0001). Using a threshold of 10 V the technique has a sensitivity of 94% and a specificity of 90%.

CONCLUSION

Electrical stimulation of pedicle screws and EMG recording in abdominal and leg muscles in sheep provide a reliable indication of pedicle screw position. This technique can be directly applied to human thoracolumbar surgery, but differences in pedicle size would mean that new threshold voltage criteria would need to be established.

Spinal cord and nerve root monitoring during surgical treatment of lumbar stenosis

The author describes application of intraoperative neurophysiologic monitoring to surgical treatment of lumbar stenosis. Benefits of somatosensory and motor evoked potential studies during surgical correction of spinal deformity are well known and documented. Free-running and evoked electromyographic studies during pedicle screw implantation is an accepted practice at many institutions. However, the functional integrity of spinal cord, cauda equina, and nerve roots should be monitored throughout every stage of surgery including exposure and decompression. Somatosensory evoked potentials monitor overall spinal cord function. Intraoperative electromyography provides continuous assessment of motor root function in response to direct and indirect surgical manipulation. Electromyographic activities observed during exposure and decompression of the lumbosacral spine included complex patterns of bursting and neurotonic discharge. In addition, electromyographic activities at distal musculature were elicited by impacting a surgical instrument or graft plug against bony elements of the spine. All electromyographic events provided direct feedback to the surgical team and were regarded as a cause for concern. Simultaneously monitored evoked potential and electromyographic studies protect spinal cord and nerve roots during seemingly low-risk phases of a surgical procedure when neurologic injury may occur and the patient is placed at risk for postoperative myelopathy or radiculopathy.

The effect of neuromuscular blockade on pedicle screw stimulation thresholds

STUDY DESIGN

Nerve root stimulation thresholds were studied relative to the level of neuromuscular blockade in patients undergoing lumbar decompression surgery.

OBJECTIVES

To determine what levels of intraoperative neuromuscular blockade can be used during pedicle screw stimulation.

BACKGROUND DATA

Previous studies of intraoperative pedicle screw stimulation thresholds have failed to determine the effect of neuromuscular blockade on the stimulation threshold.

METHODS

Twenty-one roots in 10 patients undergoing lumbar decompression surgery were studied at different levels of neuromuscular blockade. Ninety-five nerve root thresholds were determined relative to level of blockade.

RESULTS

Neuromuscular blockade below 80% provides nerve root thresholds similar to thresholds without blockade.

CONCLUSIONS

Neuromuscular blockade should be less than 80% when using pedicle screw electrical stimulation testing.

Neurophysiologic response to intraoperative lumbosacral spinal manipulation

BACKGROUND

Although the mechanisms of spinal manipulation are poorly understood, the clinical effects are thought to be related to mechanical, neurophysiologic, and reflexogenic processes. Animal studies have identified mechanosensitive afferents in animals, and clinical studies in human beings have measured neuromuscular responses to spinal manipulation. Few, if any, studies have identified the basic neurophysiologic mechanisms of spinal manipulation in human beings or animals.

OBJECTIVES

The purpose of this clinical investigation was to determine the feasibility of obtaining intraoperative neurophysiologic recordings and to quantify mixed-nerve root action potentials in response to lumbosacral spinal manipulation in a human subject undergoing lumbar spinal surgery.

METHODS

An L4-L5 laminectomy was performed in a 62-year-old man. Short-duration (<0.1 ms) mechanical force, manually assisted spinal manipulative thrusts (150 N) were delivered to the lumbosacral spine with an Activator II Adjusting Instrument. With the spine exposed, spinal manipulative thrusts were delivered internally to the L5 mammillary process, L5-S1 joint, and the sacral base with various force vectors. This protocol was repeated by contacting the skin overlying respective anatomic landmarks. Mixed-nerve root recordings were obtained from gas-sterilized platinum bipolar hooked electrodes attached to the S1 nerve root at the level of the dorsal root ganglion during the spinal manipulative thrusts and during a 30-second baseline period during which no spinal manipulative thrusts were applied.

RESULTS

During the active trials, mixed-nerve root action potentials were observed in response to both internal and external spinal manipulative thrusts. Differences in the amplitude and discharge frequency were noted in response to varying segmental contact points and force vectors, and similarities were noted for internally and externally applied spinal manipulative thrusts. Amplitudes of mixed-nerve root action potentials ranged from 200 to 2600 mV for internal thrusts and 800 to 3500 mV for external thrusts.

CONCLUSIONS

Monitoring mixed-nerve root discharges in response to spinal manipulative thrusts in vivo in human subjects undergoing lumbar surgery is feasible. Neurophysiologic responses appeared sensitive to the contact point and applied force vector of the spinal manipulative thrust. Further study of the neurophysiologic mechanisms of spinal manipulation in humans and animals is needed to more precisely identify the mechanisms and neural pathways involved.

The usefulness of electrical stimulation for assessing pedicle screw placements

The purpose of this study was to further establish the efficacy of pedicle screw stimulation as a monitoring technique to avoid nerve root injury during screw placement. The study population consisted of 662 patients in whom 3,409 pedicle screws were placed and tested by electrical stimulation. If stimulation resulted in a myogenic response at a stimulation intensity of 10 mA or less, the placement of the screw was inspected. Inspection was necessary for 3.9% of the screw placements in 15.4% of the study population. None of the patients in the study experienced any new postoperative neurologic deficits. These findings provide guidelines for the interpretation of stimulation data and support the use of this technique as an easy, inexpensive, and quick method to reliably assess screw placements and protecting neurological function.