The use of evoked EMG in detecting misplaced thoracolumbar pedicle screws

Effects of anode position on pedicle screw testing during lumbosacral spinal fusion surgery

OF BACKGROUND DATA

Pedicle screws are commonly placed with lumbar/lumbosacral fusions. Triggered electromyography (tEMG), which employs the application of electrical current between the screw and a complementary anode to determine thresholds of conduction, may be utilized to confirm the safe placement of such implants. While previous research has established clinical thresholds associated with safe screw placement, there is variability in clinical practice of anode placement which could lead to unreliable measurements.

PURPOSE

To determine the variance in pedicle screw stimulation thresholds when using four unique anode locations (ipsilateral/contralateral and paraspinal/gluteal relative to tested pedicle screws).

STUDY DESIGN

Prospective cohort study. Tertiary medical center.

PATIENT SAMPLE

Twenty patients undergoing lumbar/lumbosacral fusion with pedicle screws using tEMG OUTCOME MEASURES: tEMG stimulation return values are used to assess varied anode locations and reproducibility based on anode placement.

METHODS

Measurements were assessed across node placement in ipsilateral/contralateral and paraspinal/gluteal locations relative to the screw being assessed. R² coefficients of correlation were determined, and variances were compared with F-tests.

RESULTS

A total of 94 lumbosacral pedicle screws from 20 patients were assessed. Repeatability was verified using two stimulations at each location for a subset of the screws with an R² of 0.96. Comparisons between the four anode locations demonstrated R² values ranging from 0.76 to 0.87. F-tests comparing thresholds between each anode site demonstrated all groups not to be statistically different.

CONCLUSION

The current study, a first-of-its-kind formal evaluation of anode location for pedicle screw tEMG testing, demonstrated very strong repeatability and strong correlation with different locations of anode placement. These results suggest that there is no need to change the side of the anode for testing of left versus right screws, further supporting that placing an anode electrode into gluteal muscle is sufficient and will avoid a sharp ground needle in the surgical field.

A practical method for real-time detection of pedicle wall breaching during funneling

BACKGROUND

A reliable, real-time method for the detection of pedicle wall breaching during funnelling in spine deformity surgery could be accessible to any surgeon assisted with neuromonitoring.

METHODS

Fifty-six consecutive patients (1066 pedicles), who were submitted to spinal deformity surgery from December 2013 to July 2015 were included in the study group. A control group of 13 consecutive patients (226 pedicles) with spinal deformity surgery were operated on from January to December 2013 and were excluded from finder stimulation. In the study cohort, continuous stimulation during funnelling was delivered via a finder and subsequently a compound muscle action potential (CMAP) threshold was determined. Following funnelling, manual inspection of the pedicular internal walls was performed. The CMAP thresholds were compared with the results of palpation to determine the sensitivity and specificity of the technique for detecting pedicular breaching. To cover common ranges of damage, the medial and lateral breaches were compared and the concave-apical breaches compared to the non-apical or convex-apical breaches. In addition, a pedicle screw test was estimated for all patients.

RESULTS

ROC analysis showed 9 mA cut-off to have a sensitivity of 88.0% and a specificity of 89.5% for predicting pedicular breaching, with an area under the curve of 0.92 (95% confidence interval 0.90-0.94; P < 0.001). Using 9 mA threshold as an alert criterion, funnelling at the concave-apical pedicles showed significantly more true and false positive alerts and fewer true negative alerts when compared with the non-apical and convex-apical pedicles (P < 0.001). Medial breaches had significantly lower stimulation thresholds than lateral breaches (P < 0.001). Thresholds of screw-testing were significantly higher for study than for control-patients (P = 0.002).

CONCLUSIONS

Finder stimulation has a considerably higher sensitivity and specificity for prediction of pedicular breaching, most prominent for medial breaches. Screw-testing displayed significantly better results in patients undergoing the finder stimulation technique, as compared with the control group. The main advantages of our method are its high safety level and low cost, which may be critical in less affluent countries.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

III.

Correlation between Single-pulse and Pulse-train stimulation during Neuromonitoring of Thoracic Pedicle Screws in Scoliosis Surgery

BACKGROUND

The use of thoracic pedicle screws (TPS) during scoliosis surgery entails an inherent risk of neurological deficit. Triggered electromyography (t-EMG) is an accurate neuromonitoring test for the detection of malpositioned TPS. However, single-pulse t-EMG (SP t-EMG) stimulation has shown variable capability for detecting medial pedicle breaches while pulse-train t-EMG (PT t-EMG) could be more accurate. The aim is to analyze the correlation between SP t-EMG and PT t-EMG.

METHODS

Retrospective study including 20 patients of scoliosis correction with 294 TPS placed. A total of 588 tests with both SP t-EMG and PT t-EMG were performed, analyzed, and compared. The results of both t-EMG techniques were stratified into three different groups according to threshold obtained: Group 1 (≤6 mA), Group 2 (6.1 - 11.9 mA) and Group 3 (=12 mA). Generalized Linear Model was performed to analyze the correlation between the methods.

RESULTS

SP t-EMG elicited response in 5 screws (1.7%) at ≤ 6 mA; 28 screws (9.5%) at 6.1 - 11.9 mA; and 261 screws (88.8%) at =12 mA. PT t-EMG elicited response in 16 screws (5.4%) at ≤6 mA; 30 screws (10.2%) at 6.1 - 11.9mA; and 248 screws (84.4%) at =12 mA. There is a strong positive and significant association between SP t-EMG and PT t-EMG with a decrease ratio of 2% (95% CI: 1% to 3%).

CONCLUSIONS

SP t-EMG and PT t-EMG stimulation techniques had similar results when the stimuli were applied the TPS, but PT t-EMG may have better efficacy in low-threshold group.

Mapping of the Spinal Sensorimotor Network by Transvertebral and Transcutaneous Spinal Cord Stimulation

Transcutaneous stimulation is a neuromodulation method that is efficiently used for recovery after spinal cord injury and other disorders that are accompanied by motor and sensory deficits. Multiple aspects of transcutaneous stimulation optimization still require testing in animal experiments including the use of pharmacological agents, spinal lesions, cell recording, etc. This need initially motivated us to develop a new approach of transvertebral spinal cord stimulation (SCS) and to test its feasibility in acute and chronic experiments on rats. The aims of the current work were to study the selectivity of muscle activation over the lower thoracic and lumbosacral spinal cord when the stimulating electrode was located intravertebrally and to compare its effectiveness to that of the clinically used transcutaneous stimulation. In decerebrated rats, electromyographic activity was recorded in the muscles of the back (m. longissimus dorsi), tail (m. abductor caudae dorsalis), and hindlimb (mm. iliacus, adductor magnus, vastus lateralis, semitendinosus, tibialis anterior, gastrocnemius medialis, soleus, and flexor hallucis longus) during SCS with an electrode placed alternately in one of the spinous processes of the VT12-VS1 vertebrae. The recruitment curves for motor and sensory components of the evoked potentials (separated from each other by means of double-pulse stimulation) were plotted for each muscle; their slopes characterized the effectiveness of the muscle activation. The electrophysiological mapping demonstrated that transvertebral SCS has specific effects to the rostrocaudally distributed sensorimotor network of the lower thoracic and lumbosacral cord, mainly by stimulation of the roots that carry the sensory and motor spinal pathways. These effects were compared in the same animals when mapping was performed by transcutaneous stimulation, and similar distribution of muscle activity and underlying neuroanatomical mechanisms were found. The experiments on chronic rats validated the feasibility of the proposed stimulation approach of transvertebral SCS for further studies.

Transabdominal Motor Action Potential Monitoring of Pedicle Screw Placement During Minimally Invasive Spinal Procedures: A Case Study

Precise pedicle screw placement is a critical skill during minimally invasive spinal surgeries but can pose various challenges. Techniques such as electromyography (EMG) have been traditionally utilized for this purpose but have several shortcomings. Transabdominal motor action potential (TaMAP) has been examined as a possible effective neuromonitoring alternative and is hypothesized to provide important data on symptomatic malpositioned pedicle screws. The current study seeks to determine whether TaMAP may be an advantageous technique in the neuromonitoring of percutaneous pedicle screw placement during minimally invasive spinal procedures. The methodology involved recording TaMAP signals at the outset and the conclusion of spinal surgical procedures in human participants, for which comparisons were made of pre- and post-operative data. Results revealed that TaMAP signals remained stable during accurate pedicle screw placement and degraded during a case of inaccurate placement, for which initial misplaced hardware altered the depolarization threshold and resulted in substantial signal alteration. These results suggest that TaMAP, which is stable, repeatable, and reflects real-time information, can potentially be used as a reliable and more precise indication of accuracy in pedicle screw placement during spinal surgeries. This is the first TaMAP study conducted in human participants.

Feasibility of Endoscopic Inspection of Pedicle Wall Integrity in a Live Surgery Model

Background

Perforations of the pedicle wall during cannulation can occur with experienced surgeons. Direct endoscopic visualization has not been used to inspect pedicles previously due to bone bleeding obscuring the camera visualization. The hypothesis of this study was that endoscopic visualization of pedicle wall integrity was technically feasible and would enable identification of clinically significant pedicle breaches.

Methods

A live porcine model was used. Eight lumbar pedicles were cannulated. Clinically significant breaches were created. An endoscope was introduced and was used to inspect the pedicles.

Results

All lumbar pedicles were endoscopically visible at a systolic pressure of 100 mm Hg. Clinically relevant anatomic structures and iatrogenic pathology, such as medial, lateral, and anterior breaches, were identified. There were no untoward events resulting from endoscopic inspection of the pedicle endosteal canal.

Conclusions

Endoscopic inspection of lumbar pedicles was safe and effective. The findings on endoscopic inspection corresponded with the ball-tip probe palpation techniques. Additional techniques, such as selection between 2 tracts, was possible with the endoscopic technique.

Neuromonitoring in Spinal Deformity Surgery: A Multimodality Approach

STUDY DESIGN

Literature review.

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this study was to provide an overview of the available intraoperative monitoring techniques and the evidence around their efficacy in vertebral column resection.

METHODS

The history of neuromonitoring and evolution of the modalities are reviewed and discussed. The authors' specific surgical techniques and preferred methods are outlined in detail. In addition, the authors' experience and the literature regarding vertebral column resection and surgical mitigation of neurologic alarms are discussed at length.

RESULTS

Risk factors for signal changes have been identified, including preoperative neurologic deficit, severe kyphosis, increased curve magnitude, and significant cord shortening. Even though no evidence-based treatment algorithm exist for signal changes, strategies are discussed that can help prevent alarms and address them appropriately.

CONCLUSION

Through implementation of multimodal intraoperative monitoring techniques, potential neurologic injuries are localized and managed in real time. Intraoperative monitoring is a valuable tool for improving the safety and outcome of spinal deformity surgery.

Localization of the trunk muscles using musculoskeletal ultrasound guidance for pedicle screw stimulation during spine surgery

The precise placement of recording electrodes at the relevant myotome is mandatory while performing pedicle screw stimulation (PSS) during spine surgery; however, their placement at trunk muscles is challenging. This study aimed to determine whether ultrasound guidance is useful for trunk muscle localization for PSS during spine surgery. A retrospective clinical study was conducted from a prospective database. Eighty-four patients eligible for spine surgery were recruited. Ultrasound was used to localize the intercostal, rectus abdominis, and internal oblique and psoas muscles if pedicle screw placement was performed at T3 to L1. After the operation, patients were examined for any new neurological deficits related to this procedure, and computed tomography was performed to check screw position if indicated. Four to 22 pedicle screws were used for spinal fixation. The threshold of stimulus to obtain a compound muscle action potential ranged from 1.29 to >20mA during PSS. Six of our patients sustained new postoperative deficits, and only one case was related directly to pedicel screw misplacement. Loss of motor evoked potential (MEP) over both the lower limbs was noted during pedicle screw placement, and the stimulus threshold during PSS were 1.29mA at the left T9 and 3.8mA at the right T5 level. MEP remained absent at the end of surgery despite removal of those two screws. The patient woke with significant weakness in both lower limbs (muscle power 0/0) and voiding difficulty. Fortunately, he regained walking ability 4.5months later after intensive rehabilitation therapy.

The Indian Basket Trick: a case of delayed paraplegia with complete recovery, caused by misplaced thoracic pedicle screw

Introduction

Pedicle screw fixation allows purchase of all three spinal columns without encroaching into the spinal canal improving fracture fixation, as well as deformity correction. Fortunately, neurologic injury associated with pedicle screw malposition is rare.

Case presentation

A 19-year-old boy was surgically treated for severe right thoracic scoliosis associated with a Chiari Type 1 malformation and a C6 to T7 syringomyelia. Six months after the initial surgery, the patient was referred to our institution after three weeks of gait disturbances and repeated falls. Imaging showed the gross misplacement of the left T5 pedicle screw, which crossed the center of the vertebral canal. The initial surgery used a freehand technique of pedicle screw insertion, with anteroposterior and lateral postoperative X-ray control. During the surgery, no SEP modifications were noted during pedicle screw placement. However, after insertion of the second rod and scoliosis correction by posterior translation technique, SEP responses decreased considerably. Revision surgery was performed to remove the misplaced screw. During the first three months after screw removal, repeated clinical examinations showed progressive recovery of the neurological deficits. Gait and bladder functions were normal six months after screw removal, and clinical signs of spasticity disappeared. SEP explorations performed at final follow-up showed similar responses to those performed before the initial surgery for scoliosis correction

Discussion and evaluation

Neurologic injury associated with pedicle screw malposition is rare. In early or delayed neurological status worsening, intraoperative or postoperative imaging must be done to detect pedicle screw misplacement. In the current case, thanks to cobalt-chromium and titanium use, MRI and CT scan allowed good visualization of the spinal canal and spinal cord. Experimental studies have shown that neurophysiological monitoring of the spinal cord does not detect moderate compression. In that way, neurophysiological monitoring is an all-or-nothing technique which can misdiagnose early stage of spinal cord injuries. Major penetration of the spinal canal by pedicle screw may conduct to hardware removal.

Conclusions

In early or delayed neurological status worsening, intraoperative or postoperative imaging must be done to detect pedicle screw misplacement. In the current case, thanks to cobalt-chromium and titanium use, MRI and CT scan allowed good visualization of the spinal canal and spinal cord. Major penetration of the spinal canal by pedicle screw may conduct to hardware removal.

Combined muscle motor and somatosensory evoked potentials for intramedullary spinal cord tumour surgery

PURPOSE

To evaluate whether intraoperative neurophysiologic monitoring (IONM) with combined muscle motor evoked potentials (mMEPs) and somatosensory evoked potentials is useful for more aggressive and safe resection in intramedullary spinal cord tumour (IMSCT) surgery.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We reviewed data from consecutive patients who underwent surgery for IMSCT between 1998 and April 2012. The patients were divided into two groups based on whether or not IONM was applied. In the monitored group, the procedures were performed under IONM using 75% muscle amplitude decline weaning criteria. The control group was comprised of patients who underwent IMSCT surgery without IONM. The primary outcome was the rate of gross total excision of the tumour on magnetic resonance imaging at one week after surgery. The secondary outcome was the neurologic outcome based on the McCormick Grade scale.

RESULTS

The two groups had similar demographics. The total gross removal tended to increase when intraoperative neurophysiologic monitoring was used, but this tendency did not reach statistical significance (76% versus 58%; univariate analysis, p=0.049; multivariate regression model, p=0.119). The serial McCormick scale score was similar between the two groups (based on repeated measure ANOVA).

CONCLUSION

Our study evaluated combined IONM of trans-cranial electrical (Tce)-mMEPs and SEPs for IMSCT. During IMSCT surgery, combined Tce-mMEPs and SEPs using 75% muscle amplitude weaning criteria did not result in significant improvement in the rate of gross total excision of the tumour or neurologic outcome.

Neuromonitoring with pulse-train stimulation for implantation of thoracic pedicle screws: a blinded and randomized clinical study. Part 1. Methods and alarm criteria

Object

Reports of the accuracy of existing neuromonitoring methods for detecting or preventing medial malpositioning of thoracic pedicle screws have varied widely in their claimed effectiveness. The object of this study was to develop, test, and validate a novel neuromonitoring method for preventing medial malpositioning of pedicle screws in the thoracic spine during surgery.

Methods

This is a prospective, blinded and randomized study using a novel combination of input (4-pulse stimulus trains delivered within the pedicle track) and output (evoked electromyography from leg muscles) to detect pedicle track trajectories that—once implanted with a screw—would cause that screw to breach the pedicle's medial wall and encroach upon the spinal canal. For comparison, the authors also used screw stimulation as an input and evoked electromyogram from intercostal and abdominal muscles as output measures. Intraoperative electrophysiological findings were compared with postoperative CT scans by multiple reviewers blinded to patient identity or intraoperative findings.

Results

Data were collected from 71 patients, in whom 802 screws were implanted between the T-1 and L-1 vertebral levels. A total of 32 screws ended up with screw threads encroaching on the spinal canal by at least 2 mm. Pulse-train stimulation within the pedicle track using a ball-tipped probe and electromyography from lower limb muscles correctly predicted all 32 (100%) of these medially malpositioned screws. The combination of pedicle track stimulation and electromyogram response from leg muscles proved to be far more effective in predicting these medially malpositioned screws than was direct screw stimulation and any of the target muscles (intercostal, abdominal, or lower limb muscles) we monitored. Based on receiver operating characteristic analysis, the combination of 10-mA (lower alarm) and 15-mA stimulation intensities proved most effective for detection of pedicle tracks that ultimately gave rise to medially malpositioned screws. Additional results pertaining to the impact of feedback of these test results on surgical decision making are provided in the companion report.

Conclusions

This novel neuromonitoring approach accurately predicts medially malpositioned thoracic screws. The approach could be readily implemented within any surgical program that is already using contemporary neuromonitoring methods that include transcranial stimulation for monitoring motor evoked potentials.

Intraoperative Neurophysiological Changes Induced by Thoracic Pedicle Screws Intentionally Placed Within the Spinal Canal: An Experimental Study in Pigs

STUDY DESIGN

Experimental study, OBJECTIVES: To document and analyze the neurophysiological changes during spinal cord monitoring when thoracic pedicle screws are intentionally placed within the spinal canal.

SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA

Although the rate of misplaced screws is relatively high, few patients have neurological impairment. This suggests that a significant degree of medullary displacement and/or compression is necessary to produce neurophysiological changes.

METHODS

The spinal cord of 3 experimental pigs was surgically exposed at 3 different levels (T11, T9, and T6). Two pedicle screws were placed within the spinal canal at each vertebral level under direct vision. One was placed on the lateral edge of the dural sac, causing only a slight cord displacement; a second screw was placed in the middle of the spinal canal, producing marked displacement of the neural structures. During the procedure, neurophysiological monitoring of the spinal cord was performed.

RESULTS

No neurophysiological changes were observed in any screws placed at the lateral edge of the dural sac for 20 minutes after screw placement. When the screws were placed in the center of the spinal canal, neurophysiological changes occurred with a mean latency of 10.1 ± 2.1 minutes, and at 11.6 ± 1.9 minutes there was complete loss of the spinal cord evoked potentials in all cases. After these centered screws were removed, evoked potentials began to recover, with a latency of 9.7 ± 3.0 minutes in 7 of 9 cases.

CONCLUSIONS

Neurophysiological monitoring of the spinal cord does not detect moderate compression even 20 minutes after neural compression. Only thoracic pedicle screws provoking marked displacement of the spinal cord were able to cause delayed neurophysiological changes leading to loss of spinal cord evoked potentials, which in 22% of cases did not recover after the pedicle screw was removed.

Valor predictivo de la estimulación eléctrica de los tornillos pediculares torácicos en la mal posición medial de los mismos en la instrumentación de cirugía de columna

OBJETIVO: Demostrar si la técnica de estimulación eléctrica permite la detección de la mal posición medial de los tornillos pediculares torácicos. RESULTADOS: Se analizaron 421 tornillos torácicos. Tuvimos alertas a la estimulación en 25 (5,93%) de los casos. A todos los pacientes se les realizó radiografía posoperatoria demostrando 22 tornillos (5,2%) medializados. Realizamos TAC en 17 pacientes (37%), con ningún tornillo en posición 1 y 10 tornillos en posición 2 (8,5%). Se consideraron tornillos medializados los que tenían respuesta positiva a estimulación inferior a 6 mA. CONCLUSIONES: la estimulación eléctrica nos ha permitido reducir el riesgo de posición medial de los tornillos torácicos, minimizando además el uso de radiografía intraoperatoria.

Safe pedicle screw placement in thoracic scoliotic curves using t-EMG: stimulation threshold variability at concavity and convexity in apex segments

STUDY DESIGN

A cross-sectional study of nonconsecutive cases (level III evidence).

OBJECTIVE

In a series of young patients with thoracic scoliosis who were treated with pedicle screw constructs, data obtained from triggered electromyography (t-EMG) screw stimulation and postoperative computed tomographic scans were matched to find different threshold limits for the safe placement of pedicle screws at the concavity (CC) and convexity (CV) of the scoliotic curves. The influence of the distance from the medial pedicle cortex to the spinal cord on t-EMG threshold intensity was also investigated at the apex segment.

SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA

Whether the t-EMG stimulation threshold depends on pedicle bony integrity or on the distance to neural tissue remains elusive. Studying pedicle screws at the CC and CV at the apex segments of scoliotic curves is a good model to address this issue because the spinal cord is displaced to the CC in these patients.

METHODS

A total of 23 patients who underwent posterior fusions using 358 pedicle thoracic screws were reviewed. All patients presented main thoracic scoliosis, with a mean Cobb angle of 58.3 degrees (range, 46-87 degrees). Accuracy of the screw placement was tested at surgery by the t-EMG technique. During surgery, 8 screws placed at the CC showed t-EMG threshold values below 7 mA and were carefully removed. Another 25 screws disclosed stimulation thresholds within the range of 7 to 12 mA. After checking the screw positions by intraoperative fluoroscopy, 15 screws were removed because of clear signs of malpositioning. Every patient underwent a preoperative magnetic resonance imaging examination, in which the distances from the spinal cord to the pedicles of the concave and convex sides at 3 apex vertebrae were measured. Postoperative computed tomographic scans were used in all patients to detect screw malpositioning of the final 335 screws.

RESULTS

According to postoperative computed tomographic scans, 44 screws (13.1%) showed different malpositions: 40 screws (11.9%) perforated the medial pedicle wall, but only 11 screws (3.2%) were completely inside the spinal canal. If we considered the 23 screws removed during surgery, the true rate of misplaced screws increased to 18.7%. In those screws that preserved the pedicle cortex (well-positioned screws), EMG thresholds from the CC showed statistically significantly lower values than those registered at the CV of the deformity (21.1 ± 8.2 vs 23.9 ± 7.7 mA, P < 0.01). In the concave side, t-EMG threshold values under 8 mA should be unacceptable because they correspond to screw malpositioning. Threshold values above 14 mA indicate an accurate intrapedicular position with certainty. At the convex side, threshold values below 11 mA always indicate screw malpositioning, and values above 19 mA imply accurate screw placement. At the 3 apex vertebrae, the average pedicle-spinal cord distance was 2.2 ± 0.7 mm at the concave side and 9.8 ± 4.3 mm at the convex side (P < 0.001). In well-positioned screws, a correlation between pedicle-dural sac distance and t-EMG threshold values was found at the concave side only (Pearson r = 0.467, P < 0.05). None of the patients with misplaced screws showed postoperative neurological impairment.

CONCLUSION

Independent of the screw position, average t-EMG thresholds were always higher at the CV in the apex and above the apex regions, presuming that the distance from the pedicle to the spinal cord plays an important role in electrical transmission. The t-EMG technique has low sensitivity to predict screw malpositioning and cannot discriminate between medial cortex breakages and complete invasion of the spinal canal.

Electromyographic thresholds after thoracic screw stimulation depend on the distance of the screw from the spinal cord and not on pedicle cortex integrity

BACKGROUND CONTEXT

Present studies concerning the safety and reliability of neurophysiological monitoring during thoracic pedicle screw placement remain inconclusive, and therefore, universally validated threshold levels that confirm osseous breakage of the instrumented pedicles have not been properly established.

PURPOSE

The objective of this work was to analyze whether electromyographic (EMG) thresholds, after stimulation of the thoracic pedicle screw, depend on the distance between the neural structures and the screws. The modifier effect of different interposed tissues between a breached pedicle and neural structures was also investigated.

STUDY DESIGN

This experimental study uses a domestic pig model.

METHODS

Electromyographic thresholds were recorded after the stimulation of 18 thoracic pedicle screws that had been inserted into five experimental animals using varying distances between each screw and the spinal cord (8 and 2 mm). Electromyographic thresholds were also registered after the medial pedicle cortex was broken and after different biological tissues were interposed (blood, muscle, fat, and bone) between the screw and the spinal cord.

RESULTS

Mean EMG thresholds increased to 14.1±5.5 mA for screws with pedicle cortex integrity that were placed 8 mm away from the dural sac. After the medial pedicle cortex was broken and without varying the distance of the screw to the dural sac, the mean EMG thresholds were not appreciably changed (13.6±6.3 mA). After repositioning the screw at a distance of 2 mm from the spinal cord and after medial cortical breach of the pedicle, the mean threshold significantly slowed to 7.4±3.4 mA (p<.001). When the screw was placed in contact with the spinal dural sac, even lower EMG thresholds were registered (4.9±1.9, p<.001). Medial pedicle cortex rupture and the interposition of different biological tissues in experimental animals did not alter the stimulation thresholds of the thoracic pedicle screws.

CONCLUSIONS

In the experimental animals, the observed electrical impedance depended on the distance of screws from the neural structures and not on the integrity of the pedicle cortex. The screw-triggered EMG technique did not reliably discriminate the presence or absence of bone integrity after pedicle screw placement. The response intensity was not related to the type of interposed tissue.

The contribution of an electronic conductivity device to the safety of pedicle screw insertion in scoliosis surgery

STUDY DESIGN

Retrospective, controlled clinical study.

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the contribution of an electronic conductivity device (ECD) to the safety of pedicle screw insertion in pediatric scoliosis surgery.

SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA

The implantation of pedicle screws in spinal deformity correction surgery has evolved into the currently predominant fixation technique. Methodologies for optimizing placement of pedicle screws are fluoroscopy, electromyography, and intraoperative image-based navigation. A hand-held ECD was recently introduced.

METHODS

Pedicle screw insertion was analyzed in 248 pediatric scoliosis patients (idiopathic, congenital, neuromuscular, syndromatic). Group I included 150 procedures without the aid of the ECD and group II included 98 ECD-aided procedures. The two groups were matched by age, sex, etiology, Cobb angle, and surgical criteria. Data on screw position and concomitant neuromonitoring alarms were compared. Group I consisted of patients operated with both the hybrid construct and pedicle screw instrumentation, while group II consisted of patients operated solely with pedicle screws. Both groups were operated on by a single surgeon with the same neurophysiologic methodology. Clinically relevant misplaced pedicle screws were established by intraoperative monitoring alarms concomitant with pedicle screw insertion.

RESULTS

A total of 1270 pedicle screw placements were analyzed in group I and compared with 1400 pedicle screw placements in group II. Neuromonitoring alarms concomitant with screw placement occurred in 10 procedures in group I (6.6%) compared with 3 in group II (3.0%). The contribution of the electronic device to reducing the number of neurophysiologic alarms was significant (P = 0.048, Fisher exact test). Nine of the 13 monitoring alarms (69%) were associated with implantation adjacent to the apex of the spinal curve.

CONCLUSION

The use of an ECD significantly reduced the incidence of clinically relevant misplaced screws in a variety of scoliosis patients, thereby increasing the safety of pedicle screw implantation.

Recording triggered EMG thresholds from axillary chest wall electrodes: a new refined technique for accurate upper thoracic (T2-T6) pedicle screw placement

This study was aimed at evaluating the sensitivity and safety of a new technique to record triggered EMG thresholds from axillary chest wall electrodes when inserting pedicle screws in the upper thoracic spine (T2-T6). A total of 248 (36.6%) of a total of 677 thoracic screws were placed at the T2-T6 levels in 92 patients with adolescent idiopathic scoliosis. A single electrode placed at the axillary midline was able to record potentials during surgery from all T2-T6 myotomes at each side. Eleven screws were removed during surgery because of malposition according to intraoperative fluoroscopic views. Screw position was evaluated after surgery in the remaining 237 screws using a CT scan. Malposition was detected in 35 pedicle screws (14.7%). Pedicle medial cortex was breached in 24 (10.1%). Six screws (2.5%) were located inside the spinal canal. Mean EMG threshold was 24.44 ± 11.30 mA in well-positioned screws, 17.98 ± 8.24 mA (p < 0.01) in screws violating the pedicle medial cortex, and 10.38 ± 3.33 mA (p < 0.005) in screws located inside the spinal canal. Below a threshold of 12 mA, 33.4% of the screws (10/30) were malpositioned. Furthermore, 36% of the pedicle screws with t-EMG stimulation thresholds within the range 6-12 mA were malpositioned. In conclusion, assessment of upper thoracic pedicle screw placement by recording tEMG at a single axillary electrode was highly reliable. Thresholds below 12 mA should alert surgeons to suspect screw malposition. This technique simplifies tEMG potential recording to facilitate safe placement of pedicle screws at upper thoracic levels.

The reliability of the ball-tipped probe for detecting pedicle screw tract violations prior to instrumenting the thoracic and lumbar spine

STUDY DESIGN

Cadaveric.

OBJECTIVE

To determine the confidence with which surgeons should rely on a flexible ball-tipped probe to detect pedicle breeches in the thoracic and lumbar spine.

SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA

The reliability of a ball-tipped probe for detecting cortical violations of the pedicle tract has not been studied among fellowship-trained surgeons.

METHODS

A total of 134 pedicles were randomized to have pedicle screw tracts with one of six possible options: no violation, anterior, superior, inferior, medial, or lateral violations. Five fellowship-trained spine surgeons examined each pedicle, using a standard flexible ball-tipped probe on three nonsequential occasions. The percentage of correctly identified violations, sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, and negative predictive value were calculated for the surgeons as a group and individually. The Cohen kappa coefficient was used to assess the accuracy of the observers and the interobserver and intraobserver agreement. Finally, we analyzed our results by spinal region to see whether this impacted the surgeons' ability to detect a pedicle violation.

RESULTS

The surgeons were able to correctly identify 81% of intact pedicles, 39% of superior, 68% of medial, 74% of lateral, 62% of anterior, and 50% of inferior violations. The sensitivity varied considerably by breech location and surgeon with a range of 18% to 85%. Positive predictive value for each breech location ranged from 12% to 20%. The specificity was 81% and negative predictive value 98% overall. The intraobserver reliability was moderate and interobserver reliability was low in this series. The ability to detect a pedicle violation was significantly better in the lower thoracic region (T6-T12) than in other areas of the spine.

CONCLUSION

The standard ball-tipped probe was much less reliable than expected. This technique can be used to confirm an intact pedicle but has an unacceptably high false-positive rate and should be used with caution. Our study suggests that overconfidence in pedicle probing might be dangerous.

Reliability of Triggered EMG for Prediction of Safety during Pedicle Screw Placement in Adolescent Idiopathic Scoliosis Surgery

Study Design

We performed a prospective study to evaluate the reliability of using triggered electromyography (EMG) for predicting pedicle wall breakthrough during the placement of pedicle screw in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis surgery.

Purpose

We wanted to correlate pedicle wall breakthrough with the triggered EMG threshold of stimulation and the postoperative computed tomography (CT) findings.

Overview of Literature

Pedicle wall breakthrough has been reported to be difficult to evaluate by radiographs. Triggered EMG had been found to be a more sensitive test to detect this breakthrough.

Methods

Seven patients who underwent the insertion of 103 pedicle screws were evaluated. The triggered EMG activity was recorded from several muscles depending on the level of screw placement. The postoperative CT scans were read by a spine surgeon who was a senior fellow in orthopedics, and a musculoskeletal radiologist.

Results

The mean age at surgery was 12.6 years (range, 11 to 17 years). The preoperative mean Cobb angle was 54.7° (range, 45 to 65°). There were 80 thoracic screws and 23 lumbar screws. All the screws had stimulation thresholds of ≥ 6 mA, except 3 screws with the stimulation threshold of < 6 mA. Ten screws (9.7%) showed violation of the pedicle wall on the postoperative CT scans. Five screws penetrated medially and another five penetrated laterally. No postoperative neurologic complications were noted in any of the seven patients.

Conclusions

Measuring the stimulation threshold of triggered EMG helps to assess the pedicle screw placement. Pedicle screws that had stimulation threshold of ≥ 6 mA were safe, with 90.3% reliability, as was assessed on the postoperative CT scans.

Recording diffusion responses from contralateral intercostal muscles after stimulus-triggered electromyography: refining a tool for the assessment of thoracic pedicle screw placement in an experimental porcine model

STUDY DESIGN

A new stimulus-triggered electromyography (EMG) test for detecting stimulus diffusion to contralateral intercostal muscles during thoracic pedicle screw placement was assessed in a porcine model.

OBJECTIVE

To determine if electromyographic thresholds in the intercostal muscles of both sides of the thorax could discriminate thoracic pedicle screw malpositions with and without neural contact at different aspects of the spinal cord and nerve roots.

SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA

There is controversy about the value of triggered EMG stimulation for aiding precise insertion of thoracic pedicle screws. A universally validated threshold that confirms screw malposition has not been established. Diffusion of EMG responses to the contralateral intercostal muscles has not previously been investigated.

METHODS

Nine domestic pigs weighing 60 to 75 kg had 108 pedicle screws placed bilaterally in the thoracic spine from T8-T13. Before spine instrumentation, neural structures were stimulated in 4 animals under direct vision at different anatomic locations from T9-T12. Recording electrodes were placed over the right and left intercostal muscles. Increasing stimulus intensity was applied until muscle response was detected at the contralateral side (EMG diffusion phenomenon). After this first experiment, the thoracic spine was instrumented in all 9 animals. Screws were placed in the pedicle in different positions, the anatomic intrapedicular location and within the spinal canal, with and without contact with the neural elements.

RESULTS

Response thresholds to direct nerve root stimulation were significantly lower than those obtained by stimulation of the dorsal aspect of the spinal cord (0.44 +/- 0.22 mA vs. 1.38 +/- 0.71 mA, P < 0.01). However, a 14-fold stimulation intensity (6.50 +/- 0.29 mA) was necessary to obtain diffusion of the EMG response to the opposite (left) side if the right nerve root was stimulated. A 2-fold increment (3.17 +/- 0.93 mA) elicited diffusion of the EMG responses to the contralateral side when stimulation was applied to the dorsal aspect of the spinal cord. EMG recordings of the 108 stimulated screws showed a significant decrease in the EMG response when the screw was in contact with the spinal cord (2.72 +/- 1.48 mA; P < 0.01) compared with that found when the pedicle track was intact (mean: 5.01 +/- 1.89 mA). Screws violating the medial wall of the pedicle, but not touching neural tissues, responded to slightly lower intensities than well-positioned screws, but this was not statistically significant (3.91 +/- 1.39 mA vs. 4.89 +/- 1.30 mA, P > 0.05).

CONCLUSION

Stimulus-triggered EMG can identify screws that violate the medial pedicle wall if they are in contact with neural tissues. EMG thresholds could not discriminate screws that violated the medial pedicle wall without neural contact from screws with accurate intraosseous placement. However, recording EMG potentials at the contralateral intercostal muscles (stimulus diffusion phenomenon) proved to be a reliable method for identifying the neural structures at risk.

Accuracy and safety of pedicle screw placement in neuromuscular scoliosis with free-hand technique

It is a retrospective analytic study of 1,009 transpedicular screws (689 thoracic and 320 lumbosacral), inserted with free-hand technique in neuromuscular scoliosis using postoperative CT scan. The aim of paper was to determine the accuracy and safety of transpedicular screw placement with free-hand technique in neuromuscular scoliosis and to compare the accuracy at different levels in such population. All studies regarding accuracy and safety of pedicle screw in scoliosis represent idiopathic scoliosis using various techniques such as free-hand, navigation, image intensifier, etc., for screw insertion. Anatomies of vertebrae and pedicle are distorted in scoliosis, hence accurate and safe placement of pedicle screw is prerequisite for surgery. Between 2004 and 2006, 37 consecutive patients, average age 20 years (9-44 years), of neuromuscular scoliosis were operated with posterior pedicle screw fixation using free-hand technique. Accuracy of pedicle screws was studied on postoperative CT scan. Placement up to 2 mm medial side and 4 mm lateral side was considered within-safe zone. Of the 1,009 screws, 273 screws were displaced medially, laterally or on the anterior side showing that 73% screws (68% in thoracic and 82.5% in lumbar spine) were accurately placed within pedicle. Considering the safe zone, 93.3% (942/1009, 92.4% in thoracic and 95.3% in lumbar spine) of the screws were within the safe zone. Comparing accuracy according to severity of curve, accuracy was 75% in group 1 (curve <90 degrees ) and 69% in group 2 (curve >90 degrees) with a safety of 94.8 and 91.2%, respectively (P = 0.35). Comparing the accuracy at different thoracic levels, it showed 67, 64 and 72% accuracy in upper, middle and lower thoracic levels with safety of 96.6, 89.2 and 93.1%, respectively, exhibiting no statistical significant difference (P = 0.17). Pedicle screw placement in neuromuscular scoliosis with free-hand technique is accurate and safe as other conditions.

Pulse-train stimulation for detecting medial malpositioning of thoracic pedicle screws

STUDY DESIGN

Thoracic pedicle screw location and the current needed to stimulate adjacent neural tissue was evaluated using brief, high-frequency pulse trains and monitoring electromyography (EMG) from muscles in the lower limbs.

OBJECTIVE

To establish a safe and reliable method for detecting medial malpositioning of pedicle screws placed in the thoracic spine during instrumentation and fusion.

SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA

Neurophysiologic studies for testing thoracic pedicle screw placement used single-pulse stimulation and monitored EMG from thoracic-innervated muscles. We propose that with this approach, stimulation fails to activate lower motor neurons innervated by spinal cord axons, such that medial malplacement of screws will go largely undetected.

METHODS

EMG was monitored from multiple lower-limb muscles. Pedicle tracks were created free-hand, using a curved pedicle finder. A ball-tipped probe-insulated along its shaft-was used to palpate the walls of the pedicle tracks. During probing, constant-current, high-frequency 4-pulse stimulus trains were delivered through the ball tip, and the minimum current (i.e., threshold) needed to evoke EMG was determined for each pedicle track. The threshold current for stimulation through each screw was also determined. Postoperative serial computed tomography scans of all implanted thoracic and L1 screws were rated with respect to screw position and the pedicle wall.

RESULTS

A total of 116 screws were implanted in 7 subjects. Two pedicle tracks were redirected during surgery because of particularly low thresholds to stimulation. Definite medial defects were found in 19 screws, 18 of which were detected by the experimental technique. For these screws, the average threshold to probe stimulation of their associated pedicle tracks was 7.9 +/- 4.6 mA, much lower than current thresholds for less medially placed pedicle tracks. Stimulation of these screws resulted in high thresholds (19.8 +/- 5.3 mA) when a response was evoked at all; stimulating 8 of these 19 medially malpositioned screws failed to elicit any lower-limb EMG at considerably higher (25 or 30 mA) stimulus intensities.

CONCLUSION

This preliminary study supports the hypothesis that high-frequency stimulus pulse trains areeffective at detecting defects in the medial wall of pedicles in the thoracic spine during instrumentation, thereby improving on techniques using single-pulse stimulus protocols.

Using triggered electromyographic threshold in the intercostal muscles to evaluate the accuracy of upper thoracic pedicle screw placement (T3-T6)

STUDY DESIGN

A prospective clinical study of high thoracic pedicle screws monitored with triggered electromyographic (EMG) testing.

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the sensitivity of recording intercostal muscle potentials to assess upper thoracic screw placement.

SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA

Triggered EMG testing from rectus muscle recordings, which are innervated from T6 to T12, has identified medially placed thoracic pedicle screws. No clinical study has correlated an identical technique with the intercostal muscle for upper pedicle screws placed in the upper thoracic spine (T3-T6).

METHODS

A total of 311 high thoracic screws were placed in 50 consecutive patients. Screws were placed from T3 to T6 and were evaluated using an ascending method of stimulation until a compound muscle action potential was obtained from the intercostal muscles. Screw position was then evaluated using computed tomography and results were compared with evoked EMG threshold values.

RESULTS

Fifteen screws (5%) showed penetration on postoperative computed tomography scans. Eleven screws showed medial cortical breakthrough (3.6%), 6 had stimulation thresholds <or=6 mA, and 5 had stimulation thresholds between 6 and 10 mA. Stimulation values for all breached screws decreases 60% to 65% from their mean. Four screws (1.3%) showed lateral cortical breakthrough with stimulation thresholds >20 mA. Of the 296 screws with thresholds between 6 and 20 mA, 285 (91%) were within the vertebra. No postoperative neurologic complications were noted in any of the 50 patients.

CONCLUSION

In this series, cortical violation is highly unlikely in patients whose stimulation threshold lies between 6 and 20 mA with values 60% to 65% decreased from the mean (98% negative predictive value). Although verification of screw placement should not depend solely on stimulation thresholds, pedicle screw stimulation provides rapid and useful intraoperative information on screw placement during procedures involving the use of thoracic pedicle screws.

Correlation between low triggered electromyographic thresholds and lumbar pedicle screw malposition: analysis of 4857 screws

STUDY DESIGN

A retrospective analysis of 1078 spinal surgical procedures with lumbar pedicle screw placement at a single institution.

OBJECTIVE

Based on previously established normative values, triggered electromyographic stimulation (TrgEMG) was re-examined to evaluate its efficacy in determining screw malposition.

SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA

Threshold values for confirmation of intraosseous placement of pedicle screws with EMG stimulation is controversial.

METHODS

TrgEMG threshold values for 4857 pedicle screws placed from L2 to S1 from 1996 to 2005 were analyzed. An ascending method of constant current stimulation was applied to each pedicle screw to obtain a compound muscle action potential (CMAP) from lower extremity myotomes. Previously determined threshold value normative data from a published clinical series of 233 screws were as follows: 0 to 4 mA, high likelihood of pedicle wall breach; 4 to 8 mA, possible pedicle wall breach; >8 mA, no pedicle wall defect.

RESULTS

A total of 7.74% (376 of 4857) of all screws tested had threshold values <8.0 mA. A total of 19.1% (72 of 376) of these were <4.0 mA: 54% (39 of 72) were repositioned (26) or removed (13) while the remaining 33 screws were left in place following repalpation. A total of 80.9% (304 of 376) had thresholds between 4 and 8 mA: 17.4% (53) were repositioned (38) or removed (15). Nine screws had thresholds of <or=2.8 mA and were either repositioned or removed following confirmation of a medial wall breach. A total of 74.5% (280 of 376) of all screws with thresholds <8.0 mA were verified as correctly placed by repalpation/radiography and therefore left in place.

CONCLUSION

The probability of a medial breach pedicle screw detected by triggered EMG stimulation increases with decreasing triggered EMG thresholds: 0.31% for >8.0 mA, 17.4% for 4.0 to 8.0 mA, 54.2% for <4.0 mA, and 100% for <2.8 mA. At 2.8 mA, triggered EMG has a specificity of 100%, with sensitivity of 8.4%; at 4.0 mA, specificity of 99% and sensitivity of 36%; and at 8.0 mA, 94% specificity and 86% sensitivity. TrgEMG is an adjunct technique and should always be used in conjunction with palpation and radiography to optimize safe pedicle screw placement.

Pedicle screw placement accuracy: a meta-analysis

STUDY DESIGN

A meta-analysis of the published literature was conducted specifically looking at accuracy and the postoperative methods used for the assessment of pedicle screw placement in the human spine.

OBJECTIVES

This study specifically aimed to identify postoperative methods used for pedicle screw placement assessment, including the most common method, and to report cumulative pedicle screw placement study statistics from synthesis of the published literature.

SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA

Safety concerns have driven specific interests in the accuracy and precision of pedicle screw placement. A large variation in reported accuracy may exist partly due to the lack of a standardized evaluation method and/or the lack of consensus to what, or in which range, is pedicle screw placement accuracy considered satisfactory.

METHODS

A MEDLINE search was executed covering the span from 1966 until 2006, and references from identified papers were reviewed. An extensive database was constructed for synthesis of the identified studies. Subgroups and descriptive statistics were determined based on the type of population, in vivo or cadaveric, and separated based on whether the assistance of navigation was employed.

RESULTS

In total, we report on 130 studies resulting in 37,337 total pedicle screws implanted, of which 34,107 (91.3%) were identified as accurately placed for the combined in vivo and cadaveric populations. The most common assessment method identified pedicle screw violations simply as either present or absent. Overall, the median placement accuracy for the in vivo assisted navigation subgroup (95.2%) was higher than that of the subgroup without the use of navigation (90.3%).

CONCLUSIONS

Navigation does indeed provide a higher accuracy in the placement of pedicle screws for most of the subgroups presented. However, an exception is found at the thoracic levels for both the in vivo and cadaveric populations, where no advantage in the use of navigation was found.

Monitoring of the Brain and Spinal Cord

IOM has become commonly used by many surgeons to enhance their intraoperative decision making and reduce the morbidity and mortality of selected procedures. The ability to perform these tests rests on the anesthesiologist's ability to provide the patient with an anesthetic plan that provides comfort and monitoring. When events occur, the anesthesiologist's knowledge and ability to manipulate the patient's physiologic condition become integral to the decision making. A good understanding of the neural anatomy, impact of physiology, and anesthetic medications can allow effective IOM and good team decision making when changes in IOM occur.

Intraoperative Monitoring of Segmental Spinal Nerve Root Function with Free-Run and Electrically-Triggered Electromyography and Spinal Cord Function with Reflexes and F-Responses

BACKGROUND CONTEXT

Orthodromic ascending somatosensory evoked potentials and antidromic descending neurogenic somatosensory evoked potentials monitor spinal cord sensory function. Transcranial motor stimulation monitors spinal cord motor function but only activates 4-5% of the motor units innervating a muscle. Therefore, 95-96% of the motor spinal cord systems activating the motor units are not monitored. To provide more comprehensive monitoring, 11 techniques have been developed to monitor motor nerve root and spinal cord motor function. These techniques include: 1. neuromuscular junction monitoring, 2. recording free-run electromyography (EMG) for monitoring segmental spinal nerve root function, 3. electrical stimulation to help determine the correct placement of pedicle screws, 4. electrical impedance testing to help determine the correct placement of pedicle screws, 5. electrical stimulation of motor spinal nerve roots, 6. electrical stimulation to help determine the correct placement of iliosacral screws, 7. recording H-reflexes, 8. recording F-responses, 9. recording the sacral reflex, 10. recording intralimb and interlimb reflexes and 11. recording monosynaptic and polysynaptic reflexes during dorsal root rhizotomy.

OBJECTIVE

This paper is the position statement of the American Society of Neurophysiological Monitoring. It is the practice guideline for the intraoperative use of these 11 techniques.

METHODS

This statement is based on information presented at scientific meetings, published in the current scientific and clinical literature, and presented in previously-published guidelines and position statements of various clinical societies.

RESULTS

These 11 techniques when used in conjunction with somatosensory and transcranial motor evoked potentials provide a multiple-systems approach to spinal cord and nerve root monitoring.

CONCLUSIONS

The techniques reviewed in this paper may be helpful to those wishing to incorporate these techniques into their monitoring program.

Intraoperative somatosensory evoked potentials to facilitate peripheral nerve release

PURPOSE

The significance of intraoperative somatosensory evoked potentials (SSEP) monitoring is well known during spinal surgery. This technology could be beneficial during peripheral nerve surgery as well. In order to illustrate potential applications, two cases of successful peripheral nerve release demonstrated by on-line, intraoperative, SSEP are reported. Clinical and technical features: The first case presents a complex brachial plexus lesion involving two mixed sensory-motor nerves: median and ulnar. The second case involved an entrapment neuropathy of the lateral femoral cutaneous nerve, a pure sensory nerve (meralgia paresthetica). For each patient we elicited specific peripheral nerve SSEP (recorded using bipolar cephalic montage) by stimulating each nerve independently. In each case, during difficult nerve dissection and after having excluded other possible factors of intraoperative SSEP variations, an increase of the SSEP amplitude was observed, and later correlated with favourable patient clinical outcome.

CONCLUSIONS

Two cases demonstrate that intraoperative SSEP monitoring may provide an effective tool to guide surgical dissection during peripheral nerve release. This technique has potentially beneficial clinical applications and warrants further investigation.

Anesthetic Management for Pediatric Spinal Fusion: Implications of Advances in Spinal Cord Monitoring

Currently, the detection of emerging injury through intraoperative neurologic monitoring is the best way to prevent neurologic injury. This requires a team approach that includes the anesthesiologist, neurophysiologist, and surgeon. The monitoring modalities available for the patient must be considered in planning the anesthetic management. In addition, intraoperative care for the patient requires an ongoing attention to how the anesthetic drugs affect spinal cord monitoring.

Probing for thoracic pedicle screw tract violation(s): is it valid?

BACKGROUND

Preparation of the thoracic pedicle screw tract is a critical step prior to the placement of screws. The ability to detect pedicle wall violation(s) by probing prior to insertion of thoracic pedicles screws, however, has not been studied. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the inter- and intraobserver agreement and the accuracy in detecting thoracic pedicle screw tract violation(s) among surgeons at various levels of training.

METHODS

With use of a straightforward trajectory, under direct visualization, 108 thoracic pedicle screw tracts (54 cadaveric thoracic vertebrae) were prepared in a standard fashion, followed by tapping with a 4.5-mm cannulated tap. A deliberate pedicle violation was randomly created by an independent investigator in either the anterior, the medial, or the lateral wall in 65 pedicles. Following this, four blinded, independent surgeons at various levels of training probed the specimens on three separate occasions to determine if a breach was present (1,296 discrete data points). Surgeon findings were then recorded as breach present or absent and, if present, breach location. The Cohen kappa correlation coefficient (kappa a) and 95% confidence interval were used to assess the accuracy of the observers and the inter- and intraobserver agreement.

RESULTS

The mean accuracy over three iterations, the validity in detecting the breach location, and the intraobserver agreement varied by level of training and experience, with the most experienced observer (observer 1) scoring the best and the least experienced observer (observer 4) scoring the worst. The three most senior surgeons had good intraobserver agreement. Interobserver agreement was low between the four observers.

CONCLUSIONS

An observer's ability to accurately detect the presence or absence of a pedicle tract violation and the breach location, if present, is dependent on the surgeon's level of training. Probing the pedicle tract prior to placement of pedicle screws in the thoracic spine is likely a learned skill that improves with repetition and experience.

Free hand pedicle screw placement in the thoracic spine: is it safe?

STUDY DESIGN

A retrospective study.

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the safety of a free hand technique of pedicle screw placement in the thoracic spine at a single institution over a 10-year experience.

SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA

Thoracic pedicle screw fixation techniques are still controversial for thoracic deformities because of possible complications including neurologic.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Three hundred ninety-four consecutive patients who underwent posterior stabilization utilizing 3204 transpedicular thoracic screws by 2 surgeons from 1992 to 2002 were analyzed. The mean age was 27 + 10 years (range 5 + 3-87 + 0 years) at the time of surgery. Etiologic diagnoses were: scoliosis in 273, kyphosis in 53, other spinal disease in 68. Pedicle screws were inserted using a free hand technique similar to that used in the lumbar spine in which anatomic landmarks and specific entry sites were used to guide the surgeon. A 2-mm tip pedicle probe was carefully advanced free hand down the pedicle into the body. Careful palpation of all bony borders (floor and four pedicle walls) was performed before and after tapping. Next, the screw was placed, followed by neurophysiologic (screw stimulation with rectus abdominus muscle recording) and radiographic (anteroposterior and lateral) confirmation. An independent spine surgeon using medical records and roentgenograms taken during treatment and follow-up reviewed all the patients.

RESULTS

The number of the screws inserted at each level were as follows (total n = 3204): T1, n = 13; T2, n = 60; T3, n = 192; T4, n = 275; T5, n = 279; T6, n = 240; T7, n = 230; T8, n = 253; T9, n = 259; T10, n = 341; T11, n = 488; T12, n = 572. Five hundred seventy-seven screws inserted into the deformed thoracic spine were randomly evaluated by thoracic computed tomography scan to assess for screw position. Thirty-six screws (6.2%) were inserted with moderate cortical perforation, which meant the central line of the pedicle screw was out of the outer cortex of the pedicle wall and included 10 screws (1.7%) that violated the medial wall. There were no screws (out of the entire study group of 3204) with any neurologic, vascular, or visceral complications with up to 10 years follow-up.

CONCLUSIONS

The free hand technique of thoracic pedicle screw placement performed in a step-wise, consistent, and compulsive manner is an accurate, reliable, and safe method of insertion to treat a variety of spinal disorders, including spinal deformity.

Can triggered electromyograph thresholds predict safe thoracic pedicle screw placement?

STUDY DESIGN

A prospective clinical study of thoracic pedicle screws monitored with triggered electromyographic testing.

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the sensitivity of recording rectus abdominis triggered electromyographs to assess thoracic screw placement.

SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA

Triggered electromyographic testing from lower extremity myotomes has identified medially placed lumbar pedicle screws. Higher thresholds indicate intraosseous placement because of increased resistance to current flow. Lower thresholds correspond to compromised pedicles with potential for nerve impingement. No clinical study has correlated an identical technique with rectus muscle recordings, which are innervated from T6 to T12.

METHODS

A total of 677 thoracic screws were placed in 92 consecutive patients. Screws placed from T6 and T12 were evaluated using an ascending method of stimulation until a compound muscle action potential was obtained from the rectus abdominis. Threshold values were compared both in absolute terms and also in relation to other intrapatient values.

RESULTS

Screws were separated into three groups: Group A (n = 650 screws) had thresholds >6.0 mA and intraosseus placement. Group B (n = 21) had thresholds <6.0 mA but an intact medial pedicle border on reexamination and radiographic confirmation. Group C (n = 6) had thresholds <6.0 mA and medial wall perforations confirmed by tactile and/or visual inspection. Thus, 3.9% (27 of 677) of all screws had thresholds <6.0 mA. Only 22% (6 of 27) had medial perforation. Group B screws averaged a 54% decrease from the mean as compared with a 69% decrease for Group C screws (P = 0.0160). There were no postoperative neurologic deficits or radicular chest wall complaints.

CONCLUSION

To assess thoracic pedicle screw placement, triggered electromyographic thresholds <6.0 mA, coupled with values 60-65% decreased from the mean of all other thresholds in a given patient, should alert the surgeon to suspect a medial pedicle wall breach.