Evaluation of fluorescence polarization immunoassay for determination of cyclosporin in plasma

Drug-drug interaction after single oral doses of the furanocoumarin methoxsalen and cyclosporine

Furanocoumarins increase the bioavailability of drugs that are CYP3A4 substrates. A possible interaction of methoxsalen with cyclosporine was evaluated in 12 healthy volunteers following oral administration of 40 mg methoxsalen, 200 mg cyclosporine, or a combination of both in a randomized crossover study. Methoxsalen increased area under the plasma concentration-time curve (AUC) and peak plasma concentration (Cmax) of cyclosporine by 29% (range, -20% to 172%; P < .05) and 8% (range, -10% to 26%; P < .05), respectively, compared to cyclosporine alone. The AUC geometric means ratio (95% confidence interval) for cyclosporine plus methoxsalen/cyclosporine alone was 1.14 (1.02, 1.27), and treatments were therefore not bioequivalent. Methoxsalen causes a clinically significant interaction with cyclosporine in some susceptible individuals. The reasons for susceptibility and the clinical implications for chronic cyclosporine administration have not been established. Caution is recommended in combination therapy, and more frequent monitoring of cyclosporine plasma levels and clinical monitoring is advised.

Effects of pentoxifylline on renal function and blood pressure in cardiac transplant recipients: a randomized trial

BACKGROUND

The current success of cardiac transplantation is in part attributable to the development of effective immunosuppressive agents such as cyclosporine. However, concern remains regarding the potential for cyclosporine-induced nephrotoxicity. Animal studies and early reports of renal protective effects of pentoxifylline in bone marrow transplant recipients prompted a randomized trial in cardiac transplant recipients.

METHODS

Twenty-nine patients were randomized to receive pentoxifylline 400 mg p.o. t.i.d. or matching placebo for 1 year after cardiac transplantation. Renal function was assessed preoperatively and at 1, 6, and 12 months postoperatively. Glomerular filtration rate and renal plasma flow were measured with iothalamate and para-aminohippurate, respectively. Serum creatinine was also measured. Ambulatory blood pressure monitoring after withdrawal of antihypertensives for 3 days was performed 12 months postoperatively.

RESULTS

Twenty-seven patients completed the study. Glomerular filtration rate rose between 1 and 6 months after transplantation, presumably due to the reduction in goal cyclosporine level in that period, and then fell modestly between 6 and 12 months, presumably due to ongoing nephrotoxic effects of cyclosporine. No difference in glomerular filtration rate or creatinine was seen between pentoxifylline and placebo groups at any interval. Renal plasma flow increased modestly between baseline and 6 months in the pentoxifylline group, but not in the placebo group, and then fell between 6 and 12 months. Serum creatinine increased between baseline and 6 months in both groups, apparently due to increased body weight. Results of 18-hr ambulatory blood pressure monitoring obtained 1 year after transplantation was not different between groups.

CONCLUSIONS

Renal function declines only modestly in the first year after cardiac transplantation. Pentoxifylline did not attenuate this process and had no effect on blood pressure. The modest decline in renal function may be related to current immunosuppressive strategies.

Effect of assay methodology on pharmacokinetic differences between cyclosporine Neoral® and Sandimmune® formulations

The new oral formulation of cyclosporine (CsA), Neoral® (CsA-N), results in increased area under the curve (AUC) and decreased intra- and interindividual variation in blood concentrations and other pharmacokinetic (PK) parameters when compared with the current Sandimmune® (CsA-S) formulation. The present study examines the effect of assay methodology on variability in blood concentrations and PK parameters for renal transplant patients receiving CsA-N and CsA-S and whether this variation is reduced with CsA-N. The results show that interindividual variations in PK parameters for patients receiving CsA-N were less than those for patients receiving CsA-S. Both blood concentrations and dose of CsA better correlated with abbreviated (4-h) AUC after administration of CsA-N. For both CsA-S and CsA-N, blood concentrations at 4 h postdose exhibited the best correlation with AUC. All samples were analyzed by three common procedures: HPLC, RIA, and fluorescence polarization immunoassay (FPIA). There were no significant differences observed in blood concentrations or PK parameters obtained from FPIA and RIA. HPLC results, however, were lower because of specificity of this method for the parent drug. The assay methodology did not have an effect on interindividual variability, indicating that the cross-reactivity of metabolites in commonly used immunoassays for CsA does not contribute to the PK variability observed in renal transplant patients.

A prospective study of cyclosporine concentration in relation to its therapeutic effect and toxicity after renal transplantation

1. Cyclosporine (CsA) concentrations in plasma and whole blood were monitored prospectively in 66 consecutive kidney transplant recipients for 6 months after transplantation or until graft loss. Immunosuppression was based on treatment with CsA and prednisolone in 27 patients and CsA, azathioprine and prednisolone in 39 patients. 2. Whole blood and plasma samples (separated at 37 degrees C) were collected 10-12 h after CsA dosage twice weekly over the first 3 months and thereafter once weekly. CsA concentrations were measured by high pressure liquid chromatography (h.p.l.c.) in plasma, by specific and non-specific monoclonal radioimmunoassays (r.i.a.) in whole blood, and by polyclonal r.i.a. and polyclonal fluorescence polarization immunoassay (f.p.i.a.) in whole blood and plasma. 3. There were no differences between the treatment schedules regarding graft or patient survival, occurrence of acute rejection, nephrotoxicity or infection. 4. CsA concentrations were significantly lower at the time of acute rejection than one week earlier based on all of the analytical methods used except f.p.i.a. 5. The lowest CsA concentration, recorded during the first month after transplantation, was significantly lower in patients with than in patients without experience of acute rejection episodes when the CsA concentrations were measured by polyclonal r.i.a. in whole blood and plasma and by specific and non-specific monoclonal r.i.a. in whole blood, but not by h.p.l.c. in plasma or polyclonal f.p.i.a. in whole blood or plasma. 6. The highest CsA concentration recorded during the second post-transplantation month, was higher in patients with acute nephrotoxicity than in those without nephrotoxicity when CsA was measured by specific monoclonal r.i.a. in whole blood (471 +/- 409 ng ml-1 vs 327 +/- 150 ng ml-1, P less than 0.05), but not by the other methods. 7. The mean plasma h.p.l.c. concentration of CsA measured by h.p.l.c. during the first month after transplantation was significantly higher in patients who suffered from systemic infection than in patients who did not (116 +/- 70 ng ml-1 vs 82 +/- 52 ng ml-1; P less than 0.05). 8. Thus, significant relationships between CsA concentrations and clinical events were apparent using assay methods specific for CsA as well as using polyclonal r.i.a., but not using polyclonal f.p.i.a. When h.p.l.c. was used, however, plasma drug concentrations were often below the limit of determination. Our results suggest that specific analysis of CsA in whole blood allows the best distinction between patients who respond favourably and less favourably to treatment with CsA.

Analytical evaluation of TDx cyclosporine and metabolites fluorescence polarization immunoassay and comparison with the Cyclo-Trac RIA kit

The fluorescence polarization immunoassay (FPIA) developed by Abbott Laboratories (TDx system) for the determination of cyclosporine in plasma was evaluated using whole blood as the analytical sample. The coefficients of variation for the within-run and between-run precision ranged from 3.7 to 5.7% and from 5.5 to 7.3%, respectively, for cyclosporine controls ranging in concentration from 200 to 1500 ng/ml. The detection limit was seen to be 26 ng/ml. We used specimens from renal transplant patients who received cyclosporine to compare the TDx assay with the RIA method (Incstar Cyclo-Trac). There was a good correlation between FPIA and RA results (r = 0.91; TDx = 1.29 RIA + 39.13; n = 88). It was concluded that the FPIA is an acceptable and rapid method for patient cyclosporine analysis in whole blood samples. In therapeutic drug monitoring this method offers advantages over the RIA procedure.