Therapeutic drug monitoring of phenytoin in patients with the acquired immunodeficiency syndrome

Therapeutic Drug Monitoring of Antiepileptic Drugs in Epilepsy: A 2018 Update

BACKGROUND

Antiepileptic drugs (AEDs) are the mainstay of epilepsy treatment. Since 1989, 18 new AEDs have been licensed for clinical use and there are now 27 licensed AEDs in total for the treatment of patients with epilepsy. Furthermore, several AEDs are also used for the management of other medical conditions, for example, pain and bipolar disorder. This has led to an increasingly widespread application of therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM) of AEDs, making AEDs among the most common medications for which TDM is performed. The aim of this review is to provide an overview of the indications for AED TDM, to provide key information for each individual AED in terms of the drug's prescribing indications, key pharmacokinetic characteristics, associated drug-drug pharmacokinetic interactions, and the value and the intricacies of TDM for each AED. The concept of the reference range is discussed as well as practical issues such as choice of sample types (total versus free concentrations in blood versus saliva) and sample collection and processing.

METHODS

The present review is based on published articles and searches in PubMed and Google Scholar, last searched in March 2018, in addition to references from relevant articles.

RESULTS

In total, 171 relevant references were identified and used to prepare this review.

CONCLUSIONS

TDM provides a pragmatic approach to epilepsy care, in that bespoke dose adjustments are undertaken based on drug concentrations so as to optimize clinical outcome. For the older first-generation AEDs (carbamazepine, ethosuximide, phenobarbital, phenytoin, primidone, and valproic acid), much data have accumulated in this regard. However, this is occurring increasingly for the new AEDs (brivaracetam, eslicarbazepine acetate, felbamate, gabapentin, lacosamide, lamotrigine, levetiracetam, oxcarbazepine, perampanel, piracetam, pregabalin, rufinamide, stiripentol, sulthiame, tiagabine, topiramate, vigabatrin, and zonisamide).

Therapeutic drug monitoring of antiepileptic drugs by use of saliva

Blood (serum/plasma) antiepileptic drug (AED) therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM) has proven to be an invaluable surrogate marker for individualizing and optimizing the drug management of patients with epilepsy. Since 1989, there has been an exponential increase in AEDs with 23 currently licensed for clinical use, and recently, there has been renewed and extensive interest in the use of saliva as an alternative matrix for AED TDM. The advantages of saliva include the fact that for many AEDs it reflects the free (pharmacologically active) concentration in serum; it is readily sampled, can be sampled repetitively, and sampling is noninvasive; does not require the expertise of a phlebotomist; and is preferred by many patients, particularly children and the elderly. For each AED, this review summarizes the key pharmacokinetic characteristics relevant to the practice of TDM, discusses the use of other biological matrices with particular emphasis on saliva and the evidence that saliva concentration reflects those in serum. Also discussed are the indications for salivary AED TDM, the key factors to consider when saliva sampling is to be undertaken, and finally, a practical protocol is described so as to enable AED TDM to be applied optimally and effectively in the clinical setting. Overall, there is compelling evidence that salivary TDM can be usefully applied so as to optimize the treatment of epilepsy with carbamazepine, clobazam, ethosuximide, gabapentin, lacosamide, lamotrigine, levetiracetam, oxcarbazepine, phenobarbital, phenytoin, primidone, topiramate, and zonisamide. Salivary TDM of valproic acid is probably not helpful, whereas for clonazepam, eslicarbazepine acetate, felbamate, pregabalin, retigabine, rufinamide, stiripentol, tiagabine, and vigabatrin, the data are sparse or nonexistent.

Mini-series: II. clinical aspects. clinically relevant CYP450-mediated drug interactions in the ICU

BACKGROUND

In the critically ill, multiple drug therapies for acute and chronic conditions are often used at the same time and adverse drug events occur frequently. Many pharmacological and disease-related factors, e.g. altered renal and hepatic function, catecholamine-related circulatory changes, altered drug volume of distribution, enteral versus parenteral feeding and morbid obesity, along with concomitant multiple drug regimens may account for the wide inter-individual variability in drug exposure and response in critically ill patients and for the high risk for drug-drug interactions to occur. The practicing intensivist must remain aware of the major mechanisms for drug-drug interactions, among which the drug-metabolizing enzyme inhibitory or induction potential of associated chemical entities are paramount. Metabolism-based drug-drug interactions are largely due to changes in levels of drug-metabolizing enzymes caused by one drug, leading to changes in the systemic exposure clearance of another. Among the numerous drug-metabolizing enzymes identified to date, the activity of cytochrome P450s (CYP450) is a critical determinant of drug clearance and appears to be involved in the mechanism of numerous clinically relevant drug-drug interactions observed in critically ill patients.

DISCUSSION

This manuscript will cover a practical overview of clinically relevant CYP450-mediated drug-drug interactions. Medications frequently used in the intensive care unit such as benzodiazepines, immunosuppressive agents, opioid analgesics, certain anticonvulsants, the azoles and macrolides have the potential to interact with CYP450-mediated metabolism and may lead to toxicity or therapeutic failure.

Usefulness of monitoring free (unbound) concentrations of therapeutic drugs in patient management

Drugs are bound to various serum proteins in different degrees and only unbound or free drug is pharmacologically active. Although free drug concentration can be estimated from total concentration, for strongly bound drugs, prediction of free level is not always possible. Conditions like uremia, liver disease and hypoalbuminemia can lead to significant increases in free drug resulting in drug toxicity even if the concentration of total drug is within therapeutic range. Drug-drug interactions may also lead to a disproportionate increase in free drug concentrations. Elderly patients may have increased free drug concentrations due to hypoalbuminemia. Elevated free phenytoin concentrations have also been reported in patients with AIDS and pregnancy. Currently free drug concentrations of anticonvulsants such as phenytoin, carbamazepine and valproic acid are widely measured in clinical laboratories. Newer drugs such as mycophenolic acid mofetil and certain protease inhibitors are also considered as candidates for monitoring free drug concentration.

Increased adverse drug reactions to antimicrobials and anticonvulsants in patients with HIV infection

OBJECTIVE

To review the incidence, signs, symptoms, and mechanisms of adverse drug reactions (ADRs) to sulfonamides, anticonvulsants, and antimycobacterial medications among people with HIV.

DATA SOURCES

Searches of MEDLINE/PubMed (1980-November 2005) and National Library of Medicine Meeting Abstracts (1989-November 2005), as well as hand searches of journals and abstracts, were conducted to identify primary literature. Reference lists were reviewed to identify additional relevant reports.

STUDY SELECTION AND DATA EXTRACTION

Relevant articles and abstracts, particularly of in vitro experiments and clinical studies, were compiled and reviewed.

DATA SYNTHESIS

ADRs, especially in HIV-infected patients, are a cause for concern. Sulfonamides, anticonvulsants, and antimycobacterial drugs are commonly used to prevent and treat complications of HIV, including seizures and opportunistic infections. Patients with HIV have a much greater rate of ADRs to these drug classes, including severe and life-threatening hypersensitivity reactions. Several mechanisms of these ADRs have been postulated. Sulfamethoxazole and anticonvulsant hypersensitivity may involve the increased formation and decreased detoxification of reactive metabolites. The mechanisms for the marked increase in hypersensitivity ADRs to antimycobacterial drugs may be related to an altered immune profile in patients infected with both tuberculosis and HIV.

CONCLUSIONS

ADRs to antimicrobial and anticonvulsant therapy cause markedly increased morbidity and mortality in HIV-positive patients. Further research involving the interaction between HIV and the increased ADRs to these drugs is required.

Classical Michaelis-Menten and system theory approach to modeling metabolite formation kinetics

When single doses of drug are administered and kinetics are linear, techniques, which are based on the compartment approach and the linear system theory approach, in modeling the formation of the metabolite from the parent drug are proposed. Unlike the purpose-specific compartment approach, the methodical, conceptual and computational uniformity in modeling various linear biomedical systems is the dominant characteristic of the linear system approach technology. Saturation of the metabolic reaction results in nonlinear kinetics according to the Michaelis-Menten equation. The two compartment open model with Michaelis-Menten elimination kinetics is theorethicaly basic when single doses of drug are administered. To simulate data or to fit real data using this model, one must resort to numerical integration. A biomathematical model for multiple dosage regimen calculations of nonlinear metabolic systems in steady-state and a working example with phenytoin are presented. High correlation between phenytoin steady-state serum levels calculated from individual Km and Vmax values in the 15 adult epileptic outpatients and the observed levels at the third adjustment of phenytoin daily dose (r=0.961, p<0.01) were found.

Clinical utility of free drug monitoring

Most drugs are bound to serum proteins to a various degree. Only unbound or free drug is pharmacologically active. Usually total drug is measured for therapeutic monitoring because there is equilibrium between bound and free drugs, and concentration of free drug can be predicted from total drug concentration. However, under certain conditions this equilibrium is disturbed and the measured free drug concentration can be significantly higher than expected from total drug concentrations, especially for strongly protein-bound drugs. In such case a patient may experience drug toxicity even if the total drug concentration is within the therapeutic range. Conditions like uremia, liver disease and hypoalbuminemia can lead to significant increases in free drug concentration. Therefore, monitoring free phenytoin and free valproic acid is recommended in these patients. Drug-drug interactions can also lead to a disproportionate increase in free drug concentration. One strongly protein-bound drug can significantly displace another strongly protein-bound drug if both drugs share the same binding site. Several over-the-counter pain medications such as salicylate, naproxen, and ibuprofen can cause significant displacement of both phenytoin and valproic acid from albumin binding site. Interestingly, such interactions are absent in uremic patients. Elderly patients may have increased free phenytoin or valproic acid due to hypoalbuminemia. Elevated free phenytoin concentrations have also been reported in patients with AIDS. Although digoxin is 25% bound to protein, monitoring free digoxin is useful in patients with elevated endogenous digoxin-like immunoreactive substances or in patients overdosed with digoxin and being treated with digibind. Monitoring free digoxin can also eliminate interference of Chinese medicines Chan Su and Danshen in serum digoxin measurement by certain immunoassays. However, free drug monitoring is not a routine procedure in clinical laboratories due to technical difficulties and lack of established reference ranges for free drugs.

Seizures in HIV-seropositive individuals: epidemiology and treatment

Seizures are a relatively common occurrence in patients with HIV infection. They may be a result of HIV infection of the CNS or a manifestation of an opportunistic infection. Because seizures are likely to recur in patients infected with HIV and because they are a poor prognostic indicator, it is generally recommended that all HIV-seropositive patients experiencing a first seizure without a recognisable and reversible cause be treated. Clinicians faced with treating seizures in HIV-seropositive patients often encounter a therapeutic dilemma since few data exist in this area. In selecting appropriate anticonvulsant therapy, clinicians must consider both therapy-compromising drug-drug and drug-disease interactions. Ideal anticonvulsants for this setting are those that do not effect viral replication, have limited protein binding and have no effects on the cytochrome P450 system, such as gabapentin, topiramate and tiagabine. Unless the benefits outweigh the risks, valproic acid (sodium valproate) should be avoided as it has been shown to stimulate HIV replication. Since few data exist, controlled trials examining pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic interactions between anticonvulsants and antiretrovirals are needed. Until such time, clinicians caring for these patients should examine existing data carefully and employ vigilant monitoring.

Pharmacokinetic and other drug interactions in patients with AIDS

A variety of medications are used in treating patients infected with the human immunodeficiency virus (HIV). These medications are used to control viremia and to prevent and treat opportunistic infections. An individual is often required to take numerous drugs at the same time and thus clinicians are confronted with potential drug interactions, some of which are significant. Three different groups of anti-HIV drugs are used to treat patients. These groups include nucleoside reverse transcription inhibitors, non-nucleoside reverse transcription inhibitors, and protease inhibitors. This article reviews the most relevant drug interactions that occur during the treatment of HIV-infected patients with traditional and also alternative drugs. The role of therapeutic drug monitoring in the routine management of HIV-infected patients is discussed.

Protease inhibitor-induced carbamazepine toxicity

Neurologic manifestations of HIV infection are quite diverse and can develop into seizures. Because new drug therapies have been developed, it is important to know the interactions between antiretroviral and antiepileptic agents. A 36-year-old patient with HIV developed a set of progressive left hemiparesis and secondarily generalized partial seizures related to progressive multifocal leukoencephalopathy. Phenytoin and carbamazepine were necessary to control the seizures. Instead of diverse antiretroviral therapies, the viral load was increased. Protease inhibitors (ritonavir and saquinavir) were added to the treatment and the patient developed progressive ataxia related to carbamazepine toxicity. Carbamazepine was discontinued and the patient remained asymptomatic. The patient was diagnosed with carbamazepine toxicity related to the introduction of ritonavir. Ritonavir is a potent inhibitor of hepatic cytochrome P450, mainly the CYP3A4 isoform. Carbamazepine is metabolized by this subsystem. Ritonavir acted as a CYP3A4 inhibitor, diminishing carbamazepine metabolism and provoking an increase in serum levels and clinical toxicity. We present a case of interaction between ritonavir and carbamazepine. Interaction between antiepileptic and antiretroviral agents is an emergent problem caused by the increasing association of the two therapies. We recommend strict monitoring of serum antiepileptic drug (AED) levels to avoid toxicity and inadequate seizure control.

The use of valproic acid in HIV-positive patients

OBJECTIVE

To review the use of valproic acid in HIV-positive patients.

DATA SOURCES

Clinical literature was accessed through a MEDLINE search (January 1966-November 1998). Key search terms included HIV, AIDS, seizures, valproic acid, and glutathione.

DATA SYNTHESIS

Patients with HIV often develop neurologic manifestations; therefore, valproic acid may be considered in the management of this population. It has been demonstrated that valproate may increase viral burden by potentiating replication. An evaluation of studies addressing the use of valproic acid in HIV-positive patients was conducted.

CONCLUSIONS

The potential for valproate-induced increases in viral replication exists. Although further studies are warranted, clinicians should exercise caution when using valproate in HIV-positive patients.

Review and comparison of advanced-generation macrolides clarithromycin and dirithromycin

We reviewed English-language clinical studies, abstracts, and review articles identified from MEDLINE searches from January 1966-August 1998, and bibliographies of identified articles to compare advanced-generation macrolides dirithromycin and clarithromycin and their use for respiratory tract infections. Both agents have superior adverse effect profiles compared with erythromycin, the original macrolide. Both have broad antibacterial coverage, but clarithromycin usually has a lower MIC90 to susceptible organisms than dirithromycin; for most isolates this difference is not clinically significant. Clarithromycin has better in vitro coverage of Haemophilus influenzae, but this activity varies with formation of its bioactive metabolite, 14-hydroxyclarithromycin. Neither agent is ideal for H. influenzae eradication. The agents differ markedly in terms of pharmacokinetics, pharmacodynamics, metabolism, and cost, and thus with respect to drug interaction profiles and dosages. Dirithromycin's drug interaction profile is markedly better than clarithromycin's. Clarithromycin is dosed twice/day; dirithromycin's pharmacokinetics allow once/day dosing. Dirithromycin is less expensive with regard to both cost/day and cost/treatment regimen. Clarithromycin has been studied and approved for administration to children. In adults with respiratory tract infections who are receiving drugs that would interact with clarithromycin, and in those with renal dysfunction with or without coexisting hepatic dysfunction, dirithromycin appears to be superior in terms of safety and equivalent to clarithromycin in terms of efficacy.

Elevated free phenytoin and free valproic acid concentrations in sera of patients infected with human immunodeficiency virus

Seizures are common in patients infected with human immunodeficiency virus (HIV). Phenytoin and valproic acid are common anticonvulsants, and both drugs are strongly bound to serum albumin. Because patients infected with HIV are often on polytherapy, using homeopathic medicines, and may also have hypoalbuminemia, elevated free drug concentrations may occur in these patients. The authors prepared one serum pool from patients infected with HIV but receiving no bactrim and the other pool from HIV patients receiving bactrim. They supplemented both HIV pools and normal pool (diluted with 0.9% saline to mimic albumin concentration of HIV pools) with a known concentration of phenytoin or valproic acid. After incubation at 37 degrees C for 3 hours, they measured free phenytoin and free valproic acid concentrations in the protein free ultrafiltrates using fluorescence polarization immunoassays. The total drug concentrations in original sera were measured by microparticle enzyme immunoassays. None of the patients had any significant liver or renal disease. The aliquots of HIV pools and normal pool were supplemented with the same concentration of phenytoin or valproic acid. The concentration of free phenytoin and free valproic acid were significantly elevated in patients with HIV (mean = 2.52, SD = 0.11 micrograms/ml for phenytoin; mean = 41.5, SD = 1.5 micrograms/ml for valproate) compared to controls (mean = 1.50, SD = 0.0 7 micrograms/ml for phenytoin; mean = 19.9, SD = 0.5 micrograms/ml for valproate). The concentrations of both free phenytoin and valproic acid were further elevated in patients prepared in the HIV pool who were receiving bactrim (mean = 2.81, SD = 0.09 micrograms/ml for phenytoin; mean = 44.0, SD = 1.1 micrograms/ml for valproate), but when normal serum pool was supplemented with 4.4 mg/dl of bactrim (concentration of bactrim in HIV pool) and supplemented with the same concentration of phenytoin or valproic acid, the observed free concentrations were much lower (mean = 1.65, SD = 0.05 micrograms/ml for phenytoin; mean = 26.1, SD = 1.4 micrograms/ml for valproate). This indicates that hypoalbuminemia and bactrim concentrations do not account for the observed free drug concentrations in patients with HIV. The authors also observed elevated free phenytoin and valproic acid in sera from three individual patients with AIDS compared to normals (normal serum diluted with 0.9% saline to mimic the albumin concentration of serum collected from a patient with HIV and then both specimens supplemented with the same concentration of phenytoin or valproic acid.

Macrolide antibacterials. Drug interactions of clinical significance

Macrolide antibiotics can interact adversely with commonly used drugs, usually by altering metabolism due to complex formation and inhibition of cytochrome P-450 IIIA4 (CYP3A4) in the liver and enterocytes. In addition, pharmacokinetic drug interactions with macrolides can result from their antibiotic effect on microorganisms of the enteric flora, and through enhanced gastric emptying due to a motilin-like effect. Macrolides may be classified into 3 different groups according to their affinity for CYP3A4, and thus their propensity to cause pharmacokinetic drug interactions. Troleandomycin, erythromycin and its prodrugs decrease drug metabolism and may produce drug interactions (group 1). Others, including clarithromycin, flurithromycin, midecamycin, midecamycin acetate (miocamycin; ponsinomycin), josamycin and roxithromycin (group 2) rarely cause interactions. Azithromycin, dirithromycin, rikamycin and spiramycin (group 3) do not inactivate CYP3A4 and do not engender these adverse effects. Drug interactions with carbamazepine, cyclosporin, terfenadine, astemizole and theophylline represent the most frequently encountered interactions with macrolide antibiotics. If the combination of a macrolide and one of these compounds cannot be avoided, serum concentrations of concurrently administered drugs should be monitored and patients observed for signs of toxicity. Rare interactions and those of dubious clinical importance are those with alfentanil and sufentanil, antacids and cimetidine, oral anticoagulants, bromocriptine, clozapine, oral contraceptive steroids, digoxin, disopyramide, ergot alkaloids, felodipine, glibenclamide (glyburide), levodopa/carbidopa, lovastatin, methylprednisolone, phenazone (antipyrine), phenytoin, rifabutin and rifampicin (rifampin), triazolam and midazolam, valproic acid (sodium valproate) and zidovudine.