Hepatitis C--its prevalence in end-stage renal failure patients and clinical course after kidney transplantation

Current state of kidney transplantation in patients with HIV, hepatitis C, and hepatitis B infection

Human immunodeficiency virus (HIV), hepatitis C (HCV), and hepatitis B (HBV) are common chronic viral infections in the end-stage kidney disease (ESKD) patient population that were once considered relative contraindications to kidney transplantation. In this review, we will summarize the current state of kidney transplantation in patients with HIV, HCV, and HBV, which is rapidly evolving. HIV+ patients enjoy excellent outcomes in the modern transplant era and may have new transplant opportunities with the use of HIV+ donors. Direct-acting antivirals for HCV have substantially changed the landscape of care for patients with HCV infection. HBV+ patients now have excellent patient and allograft survival with HBV therapy. Currently, kidney transplantation is a safe and appropriate treatment for the majority of ESKD patients with HIV, HCV, and HBV.

Long-term Patient and Graft Survival of Kidney Transplant Recipients With Hepatitis C Virus Infection in the United States

BACKGROUND

Hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection is common among kidney transplant (KTx) recipients. However, the impact of HCV infection on long-term graft and recipient survival after KTx from large-scale data remains to be determined.

METHODS

We used the Organ Procurement and Transplantation Network database to identify all adults undergoing KTx in 2004 to 2006 in the United States. A propensity score was created to match each HCV-positive recipient with an HCV-negative control for unbiased comparisons. Survival analysis was conducted to evaluate recipient and death-censored graft survival.

RESULTS

Out of 33 357 adult primary KTx recipients, 1470 (4.4%) were HCV-positive: 1364 HCV-positive and -negative pairs were selected by propensity score matching. Based on multivariable regression models, HCV is associated with a higher risk of death (hazard ratio [HR], 1.50; 95% confidence interval [95% CI], 1.28-1.75) and graft failure (HR, 1.26; 95% CI, 1.08-1.47). Infection was a more common cause of death in HCV-positive patients than in HCV-negative recipients (HR, 1.64; 95% CI, 1.12-2.42). The incidence of death due to liver failure was 0.23% per year among HCV-positive recipients, whereas no HCV-negative recipients died from liver failure. Graft failure due to recurrent disease was higher in HCV-positive than in HCV-negative recipients (HR, 2.00; 95% CI, 1.06-3.78).

CONCLUSION

HCV infection is associated with decreased long-term recipient and graft survival. Future studies are needed to examine whether recently available, safe, and effective antiviral therapy improves the long-term clinical outcome in these patients.

Hepatitis C virus infection in end-stage renal disease and kidney transplantation

Liver disease secondary to chronic hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection is an important cause of morbidity and mortality in patients with end-stage renal disease (ESRD) on renal replacement therapy and after kidney transplantation (KT). Hemodialytic treatment (HD) for ESRD constitutes a risk factor for bloodborne infections because of prolonged vascular access and the potential for exposure to infected patients and contaminated equipment. Evaluation of HCV-positive/ESRD and HCV-positive/KT patients is warranted to determine the stage of disease and the appropriateness of antiviral therapy, despite such treatment is challenging especially due to tolerability issues. Antiviral treatment with interferon (IFN) is contraindicated after transplantation due to the risk of rejection, and therefore, treatment is recommended before KT. Newer treatment strategies of direct-acting antiviral agents in combination are revolutionizing HCV therapy, as a result of encouraging outcomes streaming from recent studies which report increased sustained viral response, low or no resistance, and good safety profiles, including preservation of renal function. KT has been demonstrated to yield better outcomes with respect to remaining on HD although survival after KT is penalized by the presence of HCV infection with respect to HCV-negative transplant recipients. Therefore, an appropriate, comprehensive, easily applicable set of clinical practice management guidelines is necessary in both ESRD and KT patients with HCV infection and HCV-related liver disease.

Can aminotransferase-to-platelet ratio index and other non-invasive markers effectively reduce liver biopsies for renal transplant evaluation of hepatitis C virus-positive patients?

BACKGROUND

Advanced fibrosis or cirrhosis is still regarded as a contraindication for kidney transplantation alone by most centers. The value of aminotransferase to platelet ratio index (APRI) and other non-invasive markers has been less studied in hepatitis C virus (HCV)-positive patients with concurrent end-stage renal disease to predict hepatic fibrosis. Can these be used to effectively decrease the number of biopsies done in these patients being evaluated for transplantation?

METHODS

Our study population included 255 patients with liver biopsy data. All patient information was collected and reviewed from medical records. The diagnostic accuracy of the predictive models was analyzed by calculating sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value and negative predictive value.

RESULTS

The variables associated with F3-F4 were aspartate aminotransferase (P = 0.007), bilirubin (P ≤ 0.001), platelet count (P = 0.01) and APRI (P ≤ 0.001). The use of any one laboratory abnormality to predict liver biopsy scores did not show high positive predictive values (22.6-72.7%). Having abnormal liver findings or cirrhosis on imaging was associated with high specificities (92.0-97.8%) but low sensitivities (31.4-42.9%). Using APRI levels of ≥0.40 and ≤0.95 as an indication for liver biopsy, 50% of patients with F3-F4 would have correctly avoided having a biopsy. However, 33% of patients with F3-F4 would have been mislabeled and not be indicated for biopsy.

CONCLUSIONS

Our data suggest that there may not currently be a simple and sufficiently accurate non-invasive test to replace liver biopsy in renal transplant workup for HCV-positive patients. The risks outweigh the benefits when it comes to using non-invasive markers like the APRI.

Usefulness of liver biopsy in anti-hepatitis C virus antibody-positive and hepatitis C virus RNA-negative kidney transplant recipients

BACKGROUND

Some guidelines recommend a liver biopsy to all anti-hepatitis C virus (HCV) antibody-positive kidney transplant (KT) recipients. However, in the case of HCV RNA-negative KT recipients, the benefit of a liver biopsy is unclear. We examined the usefulness of a liver biopsy for anti-HCV antibody-positive and HCV RNA-negative patients by analyzing the hepatic histologic findings and clinical outcomes.

METHODS

A total of 30 anti-HCV antibody-positive patients who underwent liver biopsy before KT at Asan Medical Center were retrospectively recruited. The patients were divided into two groups based on HCV RNA positivity: 17 patients were positive and 13 patients were negative. Histologic evidence of hepatic inflammation and fibrosis was assessed using the METAVIR score, and clinical outcomes, including mortality, graft loss, and progression of liver disease, were compared.

RESULTS

The mean histologic activity scores for inflammation and fibrosis for the HCV RNA-positive and HCV RNA-negative groups were significantly different (inflammation score 1.11 ± 0.85 vs. 0.46 ± 0.51; P=0.01 and fibrosis score 1.05 ± 1.24 vs. 0.15 ± 0.37; P=0.01, respectively). The overall rates of mortality and graft loss were not significantly different between the two groups. Progression of liver disease was noted in the HCV RNA-positive group only.

CONCLUSION

The HCV RNA-negative group showed no evidence of liver disease progression. Neither did they show any histologic evidence of liver inflammation and fibrosis before KT. Therefore, it appears that liver biopsy is not necessary in anti-HCV antibody-positive and HCV RNA-negative KT recipients.

Hepatitis C virus and nonliver solid organ transplantation

: Hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection is common in solid organ allograft recipients and is a significant cause of morbidity and mortality after transplantation, so effective management will improve outcomes. In this review, we discuss the extent of the problem associated with HCV infection in donors and kidney, heart, and lung transplant candidates and recipients and recommend follow-up and treatment.Patients with end-stage kidney disease without cirrhosis and selected patients with early-stage cirrhosis can be considered for kidney transplant alone. In HCV-infected kidney allograft recipients, the progression of fibrosis should be evaluated serially by Fibroscan or serologic measures of fibrosis. Transplantation of kidneys from HCV-positive donors should be restricted to HCV-positive recipients as it is associated with a reduced time waiting for a graft and does not affect posttransplant outcomes. Hepatitis C virus antiviral therapy should be considered for all HCV-RNA-positive kidney transplant candidates, irrespective of the baseline liver histopathology. Protease inhibitors have yet to be fully evaluated in patients with renal dysfunction and in the transplant population. As these agents may cause anemia in patients with normal renal function, tolerability may be a problem in patients with end-stage kidney disease.The impact of HCV infection on survival in heart and lung transplantation is unclear. Because of the shortage of organs, few HCV-infected patients are accepted for transplantation.Universal use of nucleic acid amplification testing (NAT) for the screening of potential organ donors should be reserved to high-risk donors. Assays that quantify HCV core antigen may become more cost-effective than NAT for the screening of potential organ donors.

Efficacy and safety of treatment of hepatitis C virus infection in renal transplant recipients

AIM: To assess the efficacy and safety of combined pegylated interferon and ribavirin therapy in hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection in renal transplant recipients.

METHODS: This is a retrospective chart review of post renal transplant patients who were positive for anti-HCV and HCV-RNA, and who have received treatment with combination of pegylated interferon and ribavirin between October 2003 and December 2008. Only patients with stable graft function and absence of evidence of cirrhosis and who received the therapy for continuous 48 wk were included. Nineteen patients (13 male and 6 female) were identified and included. The patient’s complete blood count, liver and kidney profile, and calculated glomerular filtration rate (GFR) were monitored every 6-8 wk while on treatment. HCV-RNA was tested at 12 wk for early virological response, at 48 wk for end of treatment response (ETR), and then retested at 24, and 48 wk after completion of therapy for sustained virological response (SVR). Liver biopsies were obtained before treatment from all patients and graft kidney biopsies were performed as required.

RESULTS: Of the entire cohort, 9 patients (47.4%) showed an ETR and 8 had SVR (42.1%). Of the 8 patients with abnormal alanine aminotransferase (ALT) levels at baseline, 78.9% had their ALT normalized (including the virological non responders). ALT was normal in all responders at the end of therapy and at 24 wk post therapy (100%). Only one patient (5.3%) developed an increase in creatinine and decline in GFR from baseline towards the end of treatment. This patient’s kidney biopsy revealed borderline rejection. There was no impact on response by HCV-genotype, initial HCV RNA load, age or sex of the patient or duration post transplant before commencement of therapy. All patients tolerated treatment in the same way as non-transplant with no unusual or increased occurrence of side effects.

CONCLUSION: The combination of pegylated interferon and ribavirin is effective in suppressing HCV-RNA, with a low risk of graft rejection or failure in HCV infected renal transplant recipients.

Hepatitis C and kidney transplantation

Hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection is relatively common among patients with end-stage kidney disease (ESKD) on dialysis and kidney transplant recipients. HCV infection in hemodialysis patients is associated with an increased mortality due to liver cirrhosis and hepatocellular carcinoma. The severity of hepatitis C-related liver disease in kidney transplant candidates may predict patient and graft survival after transplant. Liver biopsy remains the gold standard in the assessment of liver fibrosis in this setting. Kidney transplantation, not haemodialysis, seems to be the best treatment for HCV+ve patients with ESKD. Transplantation of kidneys from HCV+ve donors restricted to HCV+ve recipients is safe and associated with a reduction in the waiting time. Simultaneous kidney/liver transplantation (SKL) should be considered for kidney transplant candidates with HCV-related decompensated cirrhosis. Treatment of HCV is more complex in hemodialysis patients, whereas treatment of HCV recurrence in SLK recipients appears effective and safe.

Chronic viral hepatitis in kidney transplantation

Chronic hepatitis B virus (HBV) or hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection in potential kidney transplant candidates-once considered absolute contraindications to kidney transplantation-no longer creates overt barriers to transplantation. Advances in the medical management of HBV and HCV infection have created opportunities for a substantial number of patients to be effectively treated with antiviral therapy before transplantation. For HBV infection, a number of new drugs enable clearance of the virus with minimal adverse effects and drug resistance. Pretransplantation antiviral therapy is advisable for patients with HCV infection, but adverse effects are common and viral eradication remains challenging. Regardless of viral clearance, pretransplant patients without bridging fibrosis (as confirmed by liver biopsy) or clinical stigmata of cirrhosis should be considered for kidney transplantation as survival is superior when compared to treatment with dialysis, and progression of liver disease is unlikely. For patients with advanced liver disease, simultaneous liver-kidney transplantation is an important consideration. These treatment advances further increase the burden of organ donor shortage; however, organs from deceased donors with chronic HBV or HCV infection could be efficiently allocated to certain individuals with a viral infection of the same type to increase the pool of available transplant organs.

Comorbidities associated with the increasing burden of hepatitis C infection

BACKGROUND

Hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection is implicated in an increasing number of liver transplantations, hospitalizations and healthcare costs.

AIMS

We present an updated assessment of comorbidities associated with HCV in comparison to the general US population.

METHODS

Cross-sectional retrospective review of data from 800 patients with HCV evaluated between January 1998 and November 2007. Patient data were prospectively collected using a standardized questionnaire completed at the first encounter and was compared with general US epidemiological data. Odds ratios and 95% confidence intervals (CI) are reported.

RESULTS

HCV conferred a 44% (CI 1.16-1.78) and 25% (CI 1.01-1.54) increased risk of diabetes (12.5 vs. 7.3-8.4%; P=0.001) and obesity (23.9 vs. 19.8-33.1%; P=0.041), respectively, compared with the US population. Human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) (5.3 vs. 0.3%; P<0.001) and end-stage renal disease (ESRD) (4.5 vs. 0.2%; P<0.001) were 16- and 13-fold more prevalent in HCV. Interestingly, HCV bestowed 90% decreased odds (CI 0.09-0.15) for hyperlipidaemia (12.3 vs. 53.2-56.1%; P<0.001). The HCV population had a higher prevalence of significant alcohol consumption (41.5 vs. 4.7%; P<0.001), current smoking (57.7 vs. 18.8-20.8%; P<0.001), drug use (46.8 vs. 14.6-15.6%; P<0.001), incarceration (6.6 vs. 2.7%; P<0.001) and tattoos (20.3 vs. 14%; P=0.011), as well as chronic fatigue (44.6 vs. 11.3-19%; P<0.001) and depression (29.3 vs. 5.0-10.3%; P<0.001).

CONCLUSION

HCV poses an increasing healthcare burden associated with increased prevalence of diabetes, obesity, HIV, ESRD, maladaptive lifestyle habits and poor quality of life. Practitioners should be cognizant of these trends in order to appropriately manage these comorbidities.

Impact of hepatitis B and C virus infections on kidney transplantation: a single center experience

OBJECTIVE

The impacts of hepatitis C virus (HCV) and hepatitis B virus (HBV) infections on patient and renal graft survivals are controversial. This study sought to evaluate the effects of pretransplantation HCV and HBV infections on renal transplant patients and their grafts at our center.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

We retrospectively examined 1224 renal transplantations performed between 1992 and 2006, including 28 HBsAg positive; 64, anti-HCV; 9, anti-HCV plus HBsAg positive; and 1123, negative for anti-HCV and HBsAg. The mean posttransplantation follow-up was 5.6 +/- 4.1 years.

RESULTS

The prevalences of HBV infection were 6.2% in 1994 and 2.3% in 2006 and those of HCV infection were 6.8% in 1998 and 5.2% in 2006. The rejection rate was higher among HBV+ (46.4%) and HCV+ (40.6%) groups than the negative groups (31.5%), but it was not significant. There were no significant differences in patient and graft survivals among the groups. The major cause of patient death was liver failure among patients with concomitant HBV+ and HCV+ infections and cardiovascular disease among HCV+ and negative patients.

CONCLUSIONS

There has been a decrease in the prevalence of recipients with hepatitis virus infections over the last 15 years. Patient and graft survivals were not affected by HCV or HBV infection.

The acquisition time of infection: a determinant of the severity of hepatitis C virus-related liver disease in renal transplant patients

BACKGROUND

The aim of this study was to compare the clinical and histopathological course of HCV infection acquired before and during or after renal transplantation.

METHODS

According to HCV status, 197 RT patients were divided into three groups. At the time of RT, anti-HCV antibody was positive in 47 patients (pre-RT HCV group). In 27 patients, in whom anti-HCV negative at the time of RT, anti-HCV and/or HCV RNA was found to be positive following an ALT elevation episode after RT (post-RT HCV group). Both anti-HCV and HCV RNA were negative at all times in remaining 123 patients (control group).

RESULTS

Liver biopsy was performed in 31 of 47 patients in pre-RT and 24 of 27 in post-RT HCV group after RT. Duration of follow-up was similar in all groups with a mean of 7.1 +/- 4.0 yr. Ascites and encephalopathy were seen in only post-RT HCV group (22%). Histological grade (6.5 +/- 2.7 vs. 4.1 +/- 1.4) and stage (2.0 +/- 1.5 vs. 0.8 +/- 0.8) was significantly severe in post-RT HCV group (p < 0.01). Three patients died due to liver failure in post-RT HCV group.

CONCLUSIONS

HCV infection acquired during or after RT shows a severe and rapidly progressive clinicopathological course, which is significantly different from pre-transplant anti-HCV positive patients.

Hepatitis C and renal transplantation: a review on historical aspects and current issues

Chronic liver disease has a significant impact on the survival of renal transplant recipients with an incidence rate of 4-38%. Approximately, 8-28% of renal transplant recipients die due to chronic liver disease. Hepatitis C seems to be the leading cause of chronic liver disease in kidney recipients. Hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection has a wide range of prevalence (2.6-66%) among renal transplant recipients living in different countries with great genotype diversity in different parts of the world. Nowadays, antiviral drugs are used for the management of hepatitis C. Because of graft-threatening effects of some antiviral drugs used in HCV-infected renal transplant recipients, we specifically focused on HCV treatment after renal transplantation. Treatment of post-renal transplantation chronic liver disease with INF and ribavirin remains controversial. Anecdotal reports on post-renal transplantation hepatitis C demonstrate encouraging findings. This review summarises the most current information on diagnosis, treatment, prognosis, complications as well as the new aspects of treatment in HCV-infected renal transplant recipients. HCV belongs to the family of Flaviviridae, genus Hepacivirus.

Hepatitis C virus infection and kidney transplantation: predictors of patient and graft survival

BACKGROUND

The effect of hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection on patients undergoing kidney transplantation (KTx) is uncertain. This study aimed to evaluate the outcomes of our HCV+/end-stage renal disease (ESRD) patient population based on the therapeutic option including KTx or continuation in dialysis.

METHODS

KTx performed at Virginia Commonwealth University Hospital between January 2000 and December 2004 were tracked prospectively. Forty-three out of a total of 394 KTx patients included in the analysis were HCV+. A group of 52 contemporaneous HCV+/ESRD patients listed, but never transplanted, was also analyzed. HCV-negative transplanted patients were used as the control group.

RESULTS

Patient survival posttransplantation was 81.4% and 68.5% at 1 and 3 years in the HCV+ group, and 97.1% and 92.9% at 1 and 3 years in the HCV- group, respectively (P=0.001). Graft survival was 81.2% and 64.1% at 1 and 3 years in the HCV+ group, and 93.2% and 84.1% at 1 and 3 years posttransplantation in the HCV- group (P=0.01). Univariate analysis identified Knodell score as a predictor of mortality in HCV+ patients (P=0.04). Cox proportional hazards multivariate analysis identified deceased donor (P=0.02), previous kidney transplant (P=0.007), pretransplant diabetes (P=0.05), and Knodell Score (P=0.012) as predictors of patient mortality. Patient survival was superior in HCV+ patients undergoing KTx versus remaining on dialysis.

CONCLUSIONS

Patients with ESRD/HCV+ benefit from KTx without achieving the excellent survival of HCV-/ESRD patients. Liver biopsy is a useful tool to identify advanced liver disease at pretransplantation time.

The kidney transplant recipient with hepatitis C infection: pre- and posttransplantation treatment

Liver disease secondary to chronic hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection is an important cause of morbidity and mortality in dialysis patients and kidney transplant recipients. Evaluation of patients with chronic HCV infection is warranted to determine stage of disease and the need for HCV therapy. Although combination therapy with interferon (IFN) plus ribavirin is the standard of care for chronic HCV infection, IFN monotherapy is recommended in dialysis patients because ribavirin is contraindicated in the presence of renal failure. The goals of pretransplantation HCV therapy are to decrease the risk for progression of HCV-associated liver disease, stabilize renal function in patients with HCV-related glomerulopathy, and prevent development of HCV-associated renal disease after transplantation. Posttransplantation HCV therapy is generally not recommended because of concerns regarding risk for precipitating acute rejection; however, antiviral therapy may be indicated to treat HCV-related glomerulopathy or prevent progression of chronic hepatitis C in patients with more advanced stages of fibrosis. When treatment is required, restored renal function allows use of combination therapy with IFN and ribavirin. Limitations of current HCV therapy include lack of tolerability and suboptimal response rates. New antiviral agents that can be used in dialysis patients (e.g., ribavirin alternatives) and in the posttransplantation setting (e.g., IFN alternatives) are needed to improve outcomes in these populations.

Hepatitis C in transplant recipients of solid organs, other than liver

Hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection is prevalent in candidates for, and recipients of, solid organ transplants. HCV infection can lead to diminished patient and allograft survival in the long-term in recipients of kidney transplants. Outcomes in recipients of other solid organ transplants (lung, heart, small bowel, pancreas, pancreas-kidney) are not well established. Large, well-designed, prospective studies are needed to answer these questions. Interferon therapy for HCV before transplantation can lead to improved outcomes. Therefore, transplant candidates should be considered for and offered interferon therapy before embarking on organ transplantation. Posttransplant interferon therapy can be complicated by acute allograft rejection and is not recommended, except with advanced liver disease.

Impact of hepatitis C virus on renal transplantation: association with poor survival

Data concerning the effect of hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection on the long-term outcome of patient and allograft survival are conflicting. We performed a retrospective study including all renal transplant recipients who underwent the procedure at our center between July 1983 and December 2004. We compared HCV-positive (n = 155) versus HCV-negative (n = 1044) recipients for the prevalence of anti-HCV, patient/donor characteristics, and graft/patient survival. The prevalence of HCV-positive patients was 12%. The anti-HCV positive recipients displayed a longer time on dialysis (P < .001), more blood transfusions prior to transplant (P < .001), and a higher number of previous transplants (P < .001). There were no differences in the incidence of acute rejection between the two groups. Patient (P = .006) and graft survival (P = .012) were significantly lower in the HCV-positive than the HCV-negative group. Graft survival censored for patient death with a functioning kidney did not differ significantly between HCV-positive and HCV-negative recipients (P = .083). Death from infectious causes was significantly higher among the HCV-positive group (P = .014). We concluded that HCV infection had a significant detrimental impact on patient and renal allograft prognosis. Death from infectious causes was significantly more frequent among HCV-positive than the non-HCV population.

Is alanine aminotransferase a good marker of histologic hepatic damage in renal transplant patients with hepatitis C virus infection?

INTRODUCTION

Renal transplant (RTx) patients with hepatitis C frequently show normal levels of alanine aminotransferase (ALT) and the significance of ALT in this group has not been established.

AIM

To determine the value of ALT as a marker of histologic hepatic damage in RTx patients with hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

HCV-RNA-positive RTx patients with a liver biopsy were analyzed regarding staging and the grading of periportal and lobular necroinflammatory activity. Spearman's correlation coefficient was used to determine the correlation between ALT and histologic variables. Sensitivity, specificity and positive and negative predictive values (PPV and NPV) of ALT in the detection of septal fibrosis and interface hepatitis, and/or confluent necrosis were calculated.

RESULTS

Fifty-three patients (32 men, 60%), with a mean age of 42 +/- 10 yr and time since transplant of 5 +/- 4 yr were included. Only 27 (51%) patients showed elevated ALT levels, which were associated with septal fibrosis (p = 0.001), interface hepatitis (p < 0.001) and confluent necrosis (p = 0.05). A correlation was observed between ALT and staging (r = 0.50, p < 0.001), periportal necroinflammatory activity (r = 0.59, p < 0.001) and lobular necroinflammatory activity (r = 0.50, p < 0.001). The sensitivity, specificity, PPV and NPV of ALT were 92, 61, 41 and 96%, respectively, for the detection of septal fibrosis, and 87, 77, 74 and 88% for the detection of interface hepatitis and/or confluent necrosis.

CONCLUSION

ALT is a good marker of histologic hepatic lesion in HCV-infected RTx patients and, therefore, liver biopsy can be avoided in patients with persistently normal ALT.

Hepatitis C virus infection in renal transplant patients: a comparative study with immunocompetent patients

The behavior of hepatitis C in states of immunodeficiency is poorly understood and it is still unclear whether the characteristics of hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection in renal transplant patients differ from those observed in immunocompetent subjects. The aim of this study was to compare the biochemical and histologic characteristics of chronic HCV infection between renal transplant and immunocompetent patients. Forty-one HCV-RNA-positive renal transplant patients and 41 immunocompetent controls matched for gender, age at infection and time of infection were included in the study. The groups were compared regarding laboratory and histologic variables. Renal transplant patients showed lower alanine aminotransferase (ALT) levels (p = 0.005) and higher levels of gamma-glutamyltransferase (p = 0.003), alkaline phosphatase (p < 0.001), and direct bilirubin (p < 0.001) when compared with controls. Histologic analysis revealed less intense portal (p < 0.001) and periportal (p = 0.046) inflammatory infiltrate in renal transplant patients but a larger proportion of cases with confluent necrosis (p = 0.043). No difference in the presence of septal fibrosis, hepatic steatosis, bile duct injury and siderosis was observed. However, there was a difference in the presence of lymphoid aggregates, which were less frequent in the renal transplant group (p < 0.001). In conclusion, the characteristics of hepatitis C in renal transplant patients differ from that observed in immunocompetent patients. In renal transplant patients, HCV infection is biochemically characterized by lower ALT levels and higher frequency of cholestasis. Regarding histology, despite lower frequency of lymphoid aggregates and less intense portal/periportal inflammatory infiltrate, a greater lobular damage was observed. The impact of these differences on the progression of fibrosis remains to be established.

Lack of Impact of Hepatitis C Virus Coinfection in End-Stage Renal Disease Patients With Hepatitis B Virus Infection

INTRODUCTION

Hepatitis B virus (HBV) and hepatitis C virus (HCV) coinfection results in more severe forms of liver disease in nonuremic patients; however, the impact of HCV coinfection is not clearly known in end-stage renal disease (ESRD) patients with HBV infection. We sought to determine the impact of HCV coinfection in HBV-infected ESRD patients.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

The HBsAg-positive ESRD patients evaluated between March 1999 and May 2003 were divided into two groups: group B, HBV infection alone, and group BC, HBV-HCV coinfection (anti-HCV-positive). Both groups were compared regarding epidemiological, laboratory, and histological findings. A liver biopsy was obtained in cases with evidence of viral replication and/or elevated alanine aminotransferase.

RESULTS

One hundred patients (73% men) with mean age of 42 +/- 11 years (55 patients in group B and 45 in group BC) were studied. Comparison between groups showed a difference in time on hemodialysis and duration of infection, which were higher in group BC (P < .001 and P = .001, respectively) and in history of blood transfusion, which was also more frequent in group BC (P = .04). Liver biopsies, obtained from 15 patients in group B and 28 patients in group BC, showed no difference in frequency of septal fibrosis (60% in group B vs 48% in group BC, P = .46) or interface hepatitis (73% vs 71%, P = .99).

CONCLUSIONS

HBV-HCV coinfection was related to a longer time on hemodialysis, longer duration of infection, and history of blood transfusion. Contrary to nonuremic patients, HCV coinfection was not associated with more severe forms of liver disease in ESRD patients.

The impact of hepatitis c virus viremia on renal graft and patient survival: a 9-year prospective study

BACKGROUND

The impact of hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection on long-term patient and renal graft survival is controversial.

METHODS

We prospectively followed up for approximately 9 years 133 hepatitis B surface antigen (HBsAg)-negative successive renal transplant recipients for whom HCV RNA polymerase chain reaction (PCR) results were available before transplantation. We compared graft and patient survival rates and causes of death and graft failure in PCR-positive and PCR-negative transplant recipients. Cox proportional hazards models were used to detect the impact of HCV infection on patient and graft survival. We also studied posttransplantation hepatic function and graft performance.

RESULTS

HCV RNA was detected in sera of 87 patients (65%). Univariate and multivariate analyses did not show an increased risk for death or graft failure in viremic compared with nonviremic transplant recipients. However, HCV-infected transplant recipients with chronic alanine aminotransferase level elevations had increased risks for death (odds ratio, 3.7; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1 to 13.7) and graft failure (odds ratio, 3; 95% CI, 1.4 to 6.7) compared with viremic transplant recipients with persistently normal liver function test results and noninfected patients. Five viremic and no nonviremic transplant recipients died of liver disease. HCV viremic transplant recipients had significantly greater frequencies of biochemical chronic liver disease, proteinuria, and biopsy-proven chronic allograft nephropathy (CAN) compared with noninfected transplant recipients.

CONCLUSION

HCV infection per se has no adverse effect on long-term renal graft and patient survival. However, HCV-infected transplant recipients with abnormal liver function have inferior survival rates. HCV infection in renal transplants is associated with greater rates of proteinuria and CAN.

Characteristics of hepatitis C in renal transplant candidates

GOALS

To characterize hepatitis C in renal transplant candidates and to compare hepatitis C-related liver disease between patients with end-stage renal disease (ESRD) and well-matched control subjects without renal disease.

BACKGROUND

Hepatitis C is common in dialysis patients and can cause morbidity and mortality in renal transplant recipients. Patients with advanced hepatitis C often are excluded from renal transplantation.

STUDY

Forty-six renal transplant candidates and 46 control subjects matched for age, sex, and race without renal disease were included. Demographic, laboratory, and histologic data were compared between patients with ESRD and control subjects.

RESULTS

Alanine aminotransferase levels were significantly lower in patients with ESRD (p < 0.001). Hepatitis C virus RNA levels were similar between groups. Patients with ESRD had less inflammatory activity (p < 0.001) and a lower proportion of bridging fibrosis or cirrhosis (13%) than control subjects (30%, p = 0.043). Clinical and laboratory features did not predict histologic grade or stage of hepatitis C in patients with ESRD. Two complications of percutaneous liver biopsy occurred per three diagnoses of cirrhosis in patients with ESRD. No complications occurred with transjugular liver biopsy in this group.

CONCLUSIONS

Patients with ESRD had less severe hepatitis C than did control subjects. Clinical measurements did not predict histologic findings in renal transplant candidates. Transjugular liver biopsy should be considered to stage hepatitis C in renal transplant candidates due to the risk of percutaneous biopsy in uremic patients.

Impact of hepatitis B and C on graft loss and mortality of patients after kidney transplantation

BACKGROUND

Mortality or graft loss after renal transplantation might be influenced by hepatitis virus infection.

METHODS

Sera from time of transplantation of 927 renal transplant recipients were tested for hepatitis C (HCV) and hepatitis B virus (HBV) in order to investigate the impact of hepatitis virus infection on graft loss and mortality over an observation period of 20 yr.

RESULTS

One hundred and twenty three of 927 patients were HCV positive, 30 patients HBV positive and seven patients HBV and HCV positive. The observation period was 9.2 +/- 4.4 yr. Mortality was significantly higher in patients with hepatitis B (p = 0.0005), as well as in patients with concomitant B and C hepatitis (p < 0.0001) and in those who acquired HCV infection after transplantation (n = 30, p = 0.0192) compared with non-infected patients. Patients with replicating HBV infection (HBeAg positive) had the worst prognosis (p < 0.0001). In the multivariate analysis the presence of HBeAg (p < 0.0001), patients' age (p < 0.0001) and HCV infection after transplantation (p = 0.0453) were predictors for death. Graft survival was significantly shorter in patients with concomitant hepatitis B and C (p = 0.0087) as well as in HBeAg positive patients (p = 0.002). HCV infection or HBs antigenemia did not have a significant impact on graft survival compared with non-infected patients.

CONCLUSION

HCV infection after transplantation is associated with a high mortality whereas chronic HCV infection before trans plantation does not have a significant impact on mortality. Patients with replicating HBV infection or concomitant HBV and HCV infection have a high risk of graft loss and mortality.

Hepatitis C virus infection and renal transplantation

With the success of organ transplantation, liver disease has emerged as an important cause of morbidity and mortality of renal transplant (RT) recipients. Numerous studies performed during the 1990s have shown that hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection is the leading cause of chronic liver disease among RT recipients. The transmission of HCV by renal transplantation of a kidney from an HCV-infected organ donor has been shown unequivocally. Liver biopsy is essential in the evaluation of liver disease of RT recipients, and histological studies have shown that HCV-related liver disease after renal transplantation is progressive. The outcome of HCV-related liver disease is probably more aggressive in RT recipients than immunocompetent individuals. Various factors can affect the progression of HCV in the RT population: coinfection with hepatitis B virus, time of HCV acquisition, type of immunosuppressive treatment, and concomitant alcohol abuse. The role of virological features of HCV remains unclear. The natural history of HCV infection after renal transplantation is under evaluation; however, recent surveys with long follow-ups have documented adverse effects of HCV infection on patient and graft survival in RT recipients. Use of renal grafts from HCV-infected donors in recipients with HCV infection does not appear to result in a greater burden of liver disease, at least for a short period. The association between HCV and de novo or recurrent glomerulonephritis after RT has been hypothesized and is an area of avid research. Reported studies do not support interferon (IFN) treatment for RT recipients with chronic hepatitis C because of the frequent occurrence of graft failure, and information on the use of other types of IFN or combined therapy (IFN plus ribavirin or amantadine) is not yet available in the RT population.

Gastrointestinal and hepatic disorders in end-stage renal disease and renal transplant recipients

Gastrointestinal and hepatic disorders are commonly associated with end-stage renal disease, hemodialysis, and renal transplantation. Recent studies indicate that the prevalence of dyspepsia, ulcer disease, and Helicobacter pylori gastritis is not significantly different from the general population. Bleeding from angiodysplasia, however, is more common in chronic renal failure, as is gastroparesis. The prevalence of chronic hepatitis B has been dramatically reduced among hemodialysis patients since the advent of universal precautions. Response rates to hepatitis B vaccine in noninfected patients, however, are lower in these individuals. Chronic hepatitis C is found in 20% to 25% of HD patients worldwide and accounts for approximately 1% of all infected individuals. Levels of alanine aminotransferase and aspartase aminotransferase are often within normal limits but may be elevated compared with a patient's preinfection levels. Dialysis has been shown to reduce the level of hepatitis C virus viremia. Treatment is similar to non-renal failure patients, although interferon is generally not used in renal transplant recipients owing to concerns of graft failure.

Histopathological features of hepatitis C in renal transplant candidates [see comment]

BACKGROUND

Although hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection is common in renal transplant candidates, its clinical significance remains unclear in this population. Little detailed information is available about the histological severity of HCV infection in these patients. We evaluated the liver biopsy features of chronic HCV in a large population of renal transplant candidates and investigated associations between histopathological changes and host- and virus-related factors.

METHODS

Thirty-seven patients seropositive for anti-HCV with chronic renal failure (CRF) referred to UCLA Medical Center for kidney or kidney/liver transplantation during the period 1992-1997 were included. HCV genotype and viral load were measured. A multivariate analysis by logistic regression model was performed: age, gender, race, HCV load and genotype, CRF level, aspartate and alanine aminotransferase activity, duration of HCV infection, underlying nephropathy, and alcohol abuse were independent variables; liver histology score was assumed a dependent variable.

RESULTS

Liver disease was present in all HCV-infected patients. Logistic regression analysis revealed that histological damage was (P = 0.0017) independently associated with the CRF level; the severity of liver disease, as shown by univariate analysis, being significantly higher in CRF patients not requiring dialysis than among dialysis population. All patients on dialysis showed mild or moderate necroinflammatory activity; the majority (22/28 = 79%) of these individuals had fibrosis, three (3/28 = 11%) dialysis patients had established cirrhosis. Thirty-one (84%) of 37 patients were tested by polymerase chain reaction, 25 (81%) patients had detectable HCV RNA in serum, the mean HCV load among viremic patients was 10.9x10(5) copies/ ml. The most frequent HCV genotypes were la (8/24 = 33%) and 1b (7/24 = 29%), followed by genotype 2b (3/24 = 12%).

CONCLUSIONS

Pathological changes on liver biopsy were observed in all HCV-infected patients awaiting renal transplantation. The severity of histologic damage observed on liver biopsy was less in dialysis than predialysis CRF patients. All dialysis patients had mild or moderate necroinflammatory activity; fibrosis was frequent with 11% of them having cirrhosis. The HCV viral load was rather low; no relationship between liver histology changes and virological features of HCV or aminotransferase activity was apparent. Further studies with repeat liver biopsies after kidney transplantation to observe the evolution of HCV-related liver disease after immunosuppressive therapy are indicated. We suggest including liver biopsy in the evaluation of the HCV-infected renal transplant candidate.

Complex management issues: management of HCV in the atypical patient

Some patients with chronic hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection demonstrate atypical features of presentation and clinical course. These features may be due to direct or indirect effects of the underlying HCV infection or may be part of a separate clinical syndrome. Patients that can be categorized as 'atypical' include immunosuppressed individuals (hypogammaglobulinaemic, co-infected with human immunodeficiency virus, recipients of solid organ or haematopoietic cell transplants, those with associated disease requiring chronic immunosuppressive therapy and patients with chronic renal failure on haemodialysis) as well as patients with various extra-hepatic (HCV-associated mixed cryoglobulinaemia, membranoproliferative glomerulonephritis etc) or autoimmune manifestations. Since many of these patients have been excluded from the large trials evaluating the efficacy of interferon-alpha alone or in combination with ribavirin, data regarding management are limited. In this chapter, the available information regarding the treatment of these patients is reviewed and the frequently encountered therapeutic dilemmas discussed. Finally, some reasonable therapeutic approaches are suggested while the need for controlled studies for these groups of patients is emphasized.

Chronic hepatitis C infection in patients with end stage renal disease: characterization of liver histology and viral load in patients awaiting renal transplantation

OBJECTIVES

Hepatitis C virus (HCV) is common in patients with end stage renal disease (ESRD) awaiting renal transplantation (RT). However, few data are available on the liver histology and viral titer in these patients relative to patients with HCV and normal renal function. The aims of this study were to assess liver histology, quantitative HCV-RNA titer, and alanine aminotransferase (ALT) levels in patients with ESRD awaiting RT, and to identify clinical predictors of histological progression to advanced bridging fibrosis and/or cirrhosis.

METHODS

A total of 50 consecutive patients (mean age 42 yr, 62% male) with ESRD and HCV, who were awaiting RT, underwent liver biopsy. Two HCV populations, one with persistently normal ALT and another with elevated ALT, both with normal renal function, served as controls. HCV-RNA titer was assessed by quantitative PCR.

RESULTS

Of the patients with ESRD, 94% had normal ALT. Log HCV RNA titer was significantly higher in patients with ESRD (5.8+/-0.3) than in either normal ALT (5.4+/-0.1) or elevated ALT (5.3+/-0.1) controls (p < 0.05). Knodell Histological Activity Index (HAI) in patients with ESRD was similar to that observed in control patients with normal ALT (4.8+/-0.4 vs 4.9+/-0.4) but significantly less (p < 0.05) than that observed in control patients with elevated ALT (8.4+/-0.5). The percentage of patients with bridging fibrosis or cirrhosis was similar in patients with ESRD and controls with persistently normal ALT (22% vs 13%) but significantly less (p < 0.001) than that observed in control patients with elevated ALT (48%). No significant differences in ALT, HCV-RNA titer, duration on hemodialysis, or time from first possible exposure was observed between ESRD patients with advance fibrosis (n = 11) and those with mild disease (n = 39).

CONCLUSIONS

Our data suggest that liver biopsy is necessary to exclude significant liver pathology in patients with HCV and ESRD, and to help define those patients in whom interferon treatment might be helpful.

The impact of azathioprine on chronic viral hepatitis in renal transplantation: a long-term, single-center, prospective study on azathioprine withdrawal

BACKGROUND

In transplanted patients, viral hepatitis progresses to chronic liver disease and patient's death after many years of transplantation. Also, it is well known that azathioprine (AZA) is harmful to the liver of these patients. However, it is unclear whether a low dose of AZA still represents a threat to the viral liver disease.

METHODS

A total of 79 patients with hepatitis C, B, or both, transplanted between 1973 and 1990, were grouped according to whether they had AZA either withdrawn from the immunosuppressive regimen [group (G) I, n=45] or a dosage reduction only (group II, n=34). The decision to remove or to keep AZA was restricted to the patient's doctor. Patients records were reviewed by April 1997.

RESULTS

After an equal time of follow-up, after the AZA changing (64+/-26 vs. 58+/-29 months), patients in GI showed a significant decrease in the serum liver parameters when compared to baseline [alanine aminotransferase (ALT): P=0.001; gamma-glutamyl transferase (gamma-GT): P=0.001 and total bilirubin: P=0.002], whereas in GII only ALT decreased (P=0.04) although gamma-GT and total bilirubin did not. Compared to baseline, serum creatinine (SCr) increased only in GI (P=0.001) but, at last follow-up, did not differ from GII. The intention-to-perform liver biopsies was equal in GI and GII (16 vs. 14) but the hystological findings of severe chronic liver disease (either chronic active hepatitis or cirrhosis) were more frequent in GII (P=0.004). Death with a functioning graft was much more frequent in GII than in GI (P=0.001). Infection and cirrhosis were more common as a cause of death in GII than in GI.

CONCLUSIONS

The use AZA is harmful to renal transplantation patients with both chronic hepatitis C and B and, therefore, should be avoided. AZA withdrawal, but not dose adjustments, diminishes the serum liver enzymes and the progression rate of the chronic viral liver disease as well as the rate of death secondary to infection and cirrhosis.

Blood-borne virus infections in dialysis units--a review

Hepatitis outbreaks in haemodialysis unit patients and staff were reported in the late 1960s. In 1972, the Rosenheim report in the UK established guidelines which included routine tests for hepatitis B surface antigen and isolation facilities for dialysing patients with hepatitis B virus which resulted in a dramatic fall in cases of hepatitis. However, since these guidelines were introduced, other blood-borne viruses, notably HCV and HIV have been discovered, and failures of infection control practices still lead to outbreaks of HBV in haemodialysis units. The prevalence of HCV in dialysis patients varies considerably throughout the world, with reported prevalence ranging from 3.9% to 71%. The number of blood transfusions and the length of time on dialysis have consistently been associated with HCV prevalence. Several reports provide evidence of patient-to-patient HCV transmission with environmental blood contamination the most significant factor in intra-unit transmission. There is no evidence that HCV has been transmitted by re-use of dialysis machines but being dialysed next to an HCV positive patient is associated with a significant risk of HCV acquisition. Several studies have shown that dialysing HCV positive patients in a separate unit or in a defined sector of a dialysis unit significantly reduces nosocomial HCV infection. HGV is prevalent in dialysis units where there is evidence of transmission to patients but no evidence of associated symptoms. HIV is infrequently transmitted in dialysis units and several units treating many HIV-positive patients have shown no evidence of transmission. Careful attention needs to be paid to infection control procedures and regular virological testing.

Hepatitis C virus infection in dialysis: a continuing problem

Patients on chronic dialysis are at increased risk of acquiring parenterally transmitted hepatitis viruses from blood product transfusions or nosocomial transmission in hemodialysis units, and biochemical abnormalities in liver function are seen in 10-44% of patients on chronic hemodialysis. In the past, hepatitis B virus (HBV) was the major cause of parenterally transmitted viral hepatitis in dialysis patients, and the remaining cases were attributed to non-A, non-B hepatitis (NANBH). The discovery of the hepatitis C virus (HCV) has shed light on the cause and clinical course of NANBH in patients on dialysis. The current debate is focused on strategies to reduce the transmission of HCV among dialysis patients and to lessen the consequences of liver disease among patients already infected.

Comparison of clinical features and liver histology in hepatitis C-positive dialysis patients and renal transplant recipients

OBJECTIVE

Liver biopsies in hepatitis C virus (HCV)-positive end stage renal disease (ESRD) patients before or after renal transplantation were compared to study the effect of transplant-related immunosuppression.

METHODS

In this prospective study all patients on the active transplant list and all patients with functioning renal transplants at our hospital were tested for HCV antibody (ELISA-2) over a 30-month period. HCV infection was confirmed by polymerase chain reaction in most patients. All HCV-positive patients were asked to undergo liver biopsy without regard to serum transaminase levels. Patients were interviewed, examined, and had detailed chart review. By protocol, liver histology was evaluated according to stage and inflammatory activity in a blinded fashion.

RESULTS

There were 129 HCV-antibody-positive patients, of 795 tested. Sixty-seven agreed to liver biopsy. Of these, 22 patients had never been transplanted and 45 had received transplants. Mean transplant duration before biopsy was 41.2 months (range, 1-204 months). Transplant patients had significantly longer duration of ESRD and estimated duration of HCV infection than patients not transplanted. Dialysis patients had significantly more portal inflammatory activity and lymphoid follicles on biopsy whereas transplant patients had more piecemeal necrosis and steatosis. However, the total histological activity score and stage were similar between groups. Multivariate analysis confirmed the association between transplant and steatosis. But independent variables including transplant duration, HCV infection duration, and ESRD duration were not correlated with histological findings.

CONCLUSION

Renal transplantation may not be associated with an increased risk of progressive liver disease in HCV-positive patients, compared with ESRD patients receiving chronic dialysis. Long-term studies with serial liver biopsies are needed to resolve this issue.

Impact of hepatitis B and C virus on kidney transplantation outcome

The impact of hepatitis B (HBV) and C (HCV) on patient survival after kidney transplantation is controversial. The aims of this study were (1) to assess the independent prognostic values of HBsAg and anti-HCV in a large renal transplant population, (2) to compare infected patients with noninfected patients matched for factors possibly associated with graft and patient survival, and (3) to assess the prognostic value of biopsy-proven cirrhosis. Eight hundred thirty-four transplanted patients were included: 128 with positive HBsAg (group I), 216 with positive anti-HCV (group II), and 490 without serological markers of HBV and HCV (group III). Fifteen percent and 29% of patients were HBsAg-positive and anti-HCV-positive, respectively. Ten-year survivals of group I (55 +/- 6%) and group II (65 +/- 5%) were significantly lower than survival of group III (80 +/- 3%, P <.001). At 10 years, among overall patients with HCV screening (n = 834), four variables had independent prognostic values in patient survival: age at transplantation (P <.0001), year of transplantation (P =.02), biopsy-proven cirrhosis (P =.03), and presence of HCV antibodies (P =.02). In the case control study, comparison of infected patients with their matched control patients showed that age at transplantation (P <.05), HBsAg (P =.005), and anti-HCV (P =.005) were independent prognostic factors. HCV, biopsy-proven cirrhosis, and age are independent prognostic factors of 10-year survival in patients with kidney grafts. The case-control study showed that anti-HCV and HBsAg were independently associated with patient and graft survivals. In infected patients, a routine liver histological analysis would improve selection of patients for renal transplantation.

Donor hepatitis C virus status does not adversely affect short-term outcomes in HCV+ recipients in renal transplantation

BACKGROUND

Recipient hepatitis C virus (HCV) seropositivity has been associated with inferior outcomes in renal transplantation (RTx). We sought to determine whether donor HCV+ status influenced the incidence of rejection, liver dysfunction, and graft survival in HCV+ recipients.

METHODS

We reviewed 44 HCV+ recipients (R+) receiving RTx from HCV+ (D+) and HCV- (D-) donors between February 1991 and September 1996. All patients were followed to the end of the study period (mean=36 months, range=12-60 months). We compared the R+ group with a demographically matched cohort of 44 HCV- recipients (R-).

RESULTS

Of the 44 R+, 25 (57%) had a total of 48 rejection episodes. Among the 44 R-, 32 (73%) had 58 rejection episodes (P>0.1). Within the R+ group, 28 were D+/R+; of these 14 (50%) had 27 rejection episodes, whereas among the 16 D-/R+, 11 (68%) had 21 rejection episodes (P>0.3). Graft and patient survival was similar in both the groups (86.4% and 91%, respectively). Liver dysfunction was slightly increased in the R+ group (4/44 vs. 0/44, P>0.1), with one death due to liver failure in this group.

CONCLUSION

Donor HCV+ status had no influence on outcomes in HCV+ recipients after kidney transplantation in the short term. The incidence of rejection, graft loss, and mortality was comparable between the D+/R+ and D-/R+ groups. Furthermore, rejection, graft loss, and death were identical in R+ and R-groups throughout the 5-year study period. We therefore conclude that HCV+ recipients can safely receive kidney transplants without concern about donor HCV status or fear of adverse events from their own HCV+ status.